SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 5, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 5, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-05.
0001178913-26-003854
ITEM 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-09-30; filed 2026-11-05.
0001178913-26-005036
ITEM 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 21 previous paragraphs and 21 current paragraphs.
13 unchanged; 7 reworded; 1 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (1)
Removed paragraphs (1)
Reworded paragraphs (7)
Previous wording
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risks set forth below and the risk factors as described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Form 10-K/A”) and Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 (the “Q1 2026 Form 10-Q”). Other than the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2025 Form 10-K/A and Q1 2026 Form 10-Q.
Current wording
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the risks set forth below and the risk factors as described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2025 (the “2025 Form 10-K/A”), Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2026 (the “Q1 2026 Form 10-Q”), and Part II, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 (together with the Q1 2026 Form 10-Q, the “Prior 2026 Forms 10-Q”). Other than the risk factors set forth below, there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in the 2025 Form 10-K/A and Prior 2026 Forms 10-Q.
Previous wording
In addition, following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling, the U.S. Administration imposed a temporary import surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 122”). The surcharge was initially set at 10% ad valorem on substantially all imports, with a statutory ceiling of 15%, subject to carve-outs for certain goods (e.g., electronics and critical minerals) and products qualifying under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. The surcharge took effect on February 24, 2026, for a maximum period of 150 days. On May 7, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that the Section 122 proclamation was invalid. This ruling has been appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a temporary stay of the ruling pending resolution of the appeal. The evolving legal status and expiration of the Section 122 tariffs create additional uncertainty regarding our tariff exposure and any potential recovery of Section 122 duties paid during the quarter. If the Section 122 proclamation is ultimately held invalid and refund mechanisms are established, we may be eligible to recover some or all the Section 122 that we have paid. However, the outcome of the appeal and the availability, timing and amount of any potential refunds remain uncertain and are subject to further judicial and administrative proceedings.
Current wording
In particular, following the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling, the U.S. Administration imposed a temporary 10% import surcharge under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 122”) on substantially all imports, subject to certain exceptions. The surcharge took effect on February 24, 2026 and expired in July 2026 upon reaching the statutory 150-day limit. On May 7, 2026, the U.S. Court of International Trade held that the Section 122 proclamation was invalid and granted relief to certain plaintiffs. The U.S. Government appealed the decision, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit subsequently stayed the judgment pending resolution of the appeal. If the Section 122 proclamation is ultimately held invalid and we become entitled to refunds, we may be eligible to recover some or all of the Section 122 duties previously paid. However, our eligibility for, and the timing and amount of, any such refunds remain uncertain and may depend on further judicial and administrative proceedings.
Previous wording
Most recently, with the expiration of Section 122 tariffs, in July 2026, the U.S. Administration imposed additional tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 301”) on imports from numerous trading partners, with rates generally ranging from 10% to 12.5%, subject to specified exemptions and exceptions. These tariffs are in addition to existing duties and may apply alongside other trade measures, including Section 301 tariffs applicable to imports from China, tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, antidumping and countervailing duties, and any future tariffs or trade restrictions that may be adopted. As with the Section 122 surcharge discussed above, these Section 301 tariffs may also be subject to legal challenge, and we cannot predict the outcome of any such challenge or its effect on our tariff exposure.
Current wording
Most recently, upon the expiration of Section 122 tariffs on July 24, 2026, the U.S. Administration imposed additional tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 (“Section 301”) on imports from 60 economies in connection with the Office of the United States Trade Representative (“USTR”) investigations relating to the failure of those economies to impose and effectively enforce prohibitions on imports produced with forced labor. The measures generally impose additional duties of 10% or 12.5%, subject to country-specific treatment and specified product exclusions and exemptions. These tariffs are in addition to certain existing duties and may apply alongside other trade measures, including Section 301 tariffs applicable to imports from China, tariffs under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, antidumping and countervailing duties, and any future tariffs or trade restrictions that may be adopted. As with the Section 122 surcharge discussed above, these Section 301 tariffs may also be subject to legal challenge, and we cannot predict the outcome of any such challenge or its effect on our tariff exposure.
Previous wording
In addition, on July 28, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) updated its “Covered List,” maintained under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, to include power inverters produced in foreign countries, effective immediately and prospectively for new product authorizations. Under this action, new inverter models that do not qualify as “domestic end products” (as defined under the Buy American Act, 48 C.F.R. § 25.101(a)) are generally prohibited from receiving the FCC equipment authorizations required to import, market, or sell such products in the United States. The FCC’s order applies to new inverter models and certain equipment modifications requiring FCC equipment authorization in the future and generally does not impact products that were authorized by the FCC prior to this order. We believe that SolarEdge inverter products continue to be eligible for sale and installation under the new order. We continuously evaluate the impact of this and other trade restrictions on our business. Inability to comply with such trade restrictions would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Current wording
In addition, on July 28, 2026, the Federal Communications Commission (the “FCC”) updated its “Covered List,” maintained under the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act, to include certain power inverters produced in foreign countries, which generally prevents covered new inverter models from receiving the FCC equipment authorizations required for their importation and sale in the United States. On August 20, 2026, the FCC modified the Covered List entry for power inverters following an updated national security determination, including to exclude from the applicable restrictions certain foreign-produced power inverters that are eligible for the advanced manufacturing production credit under Section 45X of the Internal Revenue Code, as well as power inverters that qualify as domestic end products under the applicable Buy American Act standard. The FCC also revised the scope of power inverters covered by the restriction. The FCC's restrictions generally do not affect inverter models that received the applicable FCC authorization prior to July 28, 2026, although certain modifications or updates to previously authorized models may require further FCC review under the requirements then in effect. Based on the current requirements, we believe that our inverter products continue to be eligible for sale and installation in the United States. However, further changes to the Covered List or its interpretation, as well as the application of the applicable requirements to modifications or updates to previously authorized models, could affect our ability to obtain required FCC authorizations for future products. We continuously evaluate the impact of this and other trade restrictions on our business. Inability to comply with such trade restrictions would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Previous wording
We have relocated our contract manufacturing to the United States, where we now manufacture the substantial majority of our products. We continue to manufacture a minor portion of our products in Israel, at our Sella 1 facility. However, certain components and subcomponents necessary for our products continue to be sourced from suppliers outside the United States, and imports of such items may be subject to existing or future tariffs or other trade restrictions. It is unknown whether and to what extent these tariffs will remain in place or if other new laws or regulations will be adopted. In addition, retaliatory measures may be imposed by foreign governments on products exported from the United States to markets in which we sell our products.
Current wording
We have relocated our contract manufacturing to the United States, where we now manufacture the substantial majority of our products. We continue to manufacture a minor portion of our products in Israel, at our Sella 1 facility and also continue to maintain manufacturing capabilities in Vietnam. However, certain components and subcomponents necessary for our products continue to be sourced from suppliers outside the United States, and imports of such items may be subject to existing or future tariffs or other trade restrictions. It is unknown whether and to what extent these tariffs will remain in place or if other new laws or regulations will be adopted. In addition, retaliatory measures may be imposed by foreign governments on products exported from the United States to markets in which we sell our products.
Previous wording
Because our headquarters and a substantial portion of our workforce are based in Israel, these conflicts have impacted, and may continue to impact, the availability of our workforce. Some of our employees, executive officers, and directors residing in Israel are obligated to perform reserve duty in the Israeli military and are subject to being called to active duty under emergency circumstances. In the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 279 employees, or 13% of our workforce in Israel, and in the second quarter of 2026, approximately 179 employees, or 7%, were called to active reserve duty for varying periods, which adversely affected workforce availability. Additional employees may be called to reserve duty in the future.
Current wording
Because our headquarters and a substantial portion of our workforce are based in Israel, these conflicts have impacted, and may continue to impact, the availability of our workforce. Some of our employees, executive officers, and directors residing in Israel are obligated to perform reserve duty in the Israeli military and are subject to being called to active duty under emergency circumstances. In the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 279 employees, or 13% of our workforce in Israel, and in the third quarter of 2026, approximately 120 employees, or 5%, were called to active reserve duty for varying periods, which adversely affected workforce availability. Additional employees may be called to reserve duty in the future.
Previous wording
Additionally, in 2023, the Israeli government announced plans to significantly reduce the Israeli Supreme Court's judicial oversight, including reducing its ability to strike down legislation that it deems unreasonable, and plans to increase political influence over the selection of judges. Although the Israeli Supreme Court partially struck down these plans, the current government has vowed to make other changes to law that limit the powers of the Supreme Court. If such government plans are eventually enacted, they may cause operational challenges for us since we are headquartered in Israel and many of our employees are located in Israel.
Current wording
Additionally, in 2023, the Israeli government announced plans to significantly reduce the Israeli Supreme Court’s judicial oversight, including reducing its ability to strike down legislation that it deems unreasonable, and plans to increase political influence over the selection of judges. Although the Israeli Supreme Court partially struck down these plans, the government vowed to make other changes to law that limit the powers of the Supreme Court. Following the elections held in Israel on October 27, 2026, it is unclear whether these efforts will be resumed. If such plans are eventually enacted, they may cause operational challenges for us since we are headquartered in Israel and many of our employees are located in Israel.