Titan Mining Corp
For the period ended Jul 7, 2026. Filed Jul 7, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What a company based outside the US has published at home or sent to its shareholders. It is how many foreign companies share results and news between annual reports.
Jul 7, 2026 · Filed Jul 7, 2026
Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.
Contents
EX-99.1 · PROGRAM OVERVIEW
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
The Company has completed a targeted characterization sampling program across six underground ore bodies within the Empire State Mines zinc Mineral Resource Estimate to evaluate the potential for germanium as a recoverable by-product element. Three samples were collected from within the defined mineralized domain of each ore body and analyzed for germanium. Additionally, five samples were collected by auger sampling of the upper horizon of the Number 4 Tailings, and two auger samples were collected from the upper horizons of the Edwards Tailings.
Table 1 summarizes germanium assay results by ore body. Table 2 summarizes germanium assay results from the Company's historic tailings facilities.
Table 1: Zinc Mineral Resource Estimate and Germanium Assay Results by Ore Body
| Zinc MREˆ | Germanium Sample Assay Results² | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ore Body / Zone | MRECategoryˆ | Resource(000 st)ˆ | ZnGrade(%)ˆ | Sample A(ppm)² | Sample B(ppm)² | Sample C(ppm)² |
| Upper Mahler (MWD) | Indicated | 142.1 | 16.95 | 32.3 ppm | 30.4 ppm | 26.1 ppm |
| Inferred | 306.8 | 15.52 | ||||
| Lower Mahler (LMA) | Measured | 104.3 | 19.51 | 81.1 ppm | 14.3 ppm | 11.4 ppm |
| Indicated | 389.2 | 19.44 | ||||
| Inferred | 608.4 | 16.32 | ||||
| New Fold | Measured | 111.4 | 19.71 | 49.7 ppm | 22.2 ppm | 8.7 ppm |
| Indicated | 218.4 | 17.04 | ||||
| Inferred | 354.3 | 17.39 | ||||
| N2D | Measured | 66.1 | 9.61 | 20.6 ppm | 14.0 ppm | 5.0 ppm |
| Indicated | 115.8 | 10.98 | ||||
| Inferred | 598.2 | 9.37 | ||||
| Mud Pond Apron | Indicated | 98.3 | 13.86 | 18.1 ppm | 6.2 ppm | 4.6 ppm |
| Inferred | 128.5 | 12.3 | ||||
| Mud Pond Main | Indicated | 42.1 | 10.21 | 85.6 ppm | 74.2 ppm | 4.5 ppm |
| Inferred | 555.9 | 10.54 | ||||
Zinc Mineral Resource Estimates are sourced from the Empire State Mines NI 43-101 Technical Report, effective December 1, 2025, prepared by Donald R. Taylor, MSc., PG, SME Registered Member #4029597. Mr. Taylor is a director of the Company and is not independent of the Company within the meaning of NI 43-101. Tonnages are reported in US short tons, rounded to the nearest hundred short tons. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. Inferred Mineral Resources are considered too speculative geologically to have economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to be categorized as Mineral Reserves, and there is no certainty that Inferred Mineral Resources will be converted to Measured or Indicated categories through continued exploration.
Germanium values represent individual assay results from characterization samples collected within the defined mineralized domain of each ore body. Samples were analyzed using the method described in the Quality Assurance and Quality Control section of this release. These values are exploratory in nature and do not constitute a mineral resource estimate for germanium. There has been insufficient sampling to define a representative germanium grade for any ore body, and these results must not be applied to any resource tonnage to derive a contained metal quantity. It is uncertain whether further exploration will result in germanium being delineated as a mineral resource or recoverable as an economic by-product credit. Germanium assay results have been reviewed and approved by Matthew Melnyk, CPG #11540, Titan’s VP Geology and Exploration, a Qualified Person as defined by NI43-101. Mr. Melnyk is not independent of the Company within the meaning of NI 43-101 and has not reviewed or approved any mineral resource estimate referenced herein.
Table 2: Historic Tailings Facilities - Internal Estimates and Germanium Assay Results
| Tailings Facility Information³ | Germanium Assay Results in ppm² | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TailingsFacility | EstimatedTonnage(st)³ | Basis of Estimate³ | SampleA | SampleB | SampleC | SampleD | SampleE |
| Number 4 Tails | ~18,824,000 | Internal engineering estimate (Kilbourne PEA) | 31.3 ppm | 25.8 ppm | 22.5 ppm | 21.4 ppm | 18.1 ppm |
| Edwards Tails | ~4,970,000 | Historical mill production records | 44.7 ppm | 30.1 ppm | - | - | - |
Tailings tonnage figures are internal engineering estimates only. They have not been verified by drilling, bulk density testing, or formal resource estimation and do not constitute mineral resources under NI 43-101 or any other reporting standard. The Number 4 Tails tonnage is derived from Kilbourne project engineering studies. The Edwards Tails tonnage is derived from historical mill production records.
Edwards Tails: Two samples collected. Results should not be interpreted as representative of the full tailings facility.
See footnote 2 above for full germanium assay methodology disclosure and QP attribution statement. The same disclosure applies to both Table 1 and Table 2 germanium results.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.