Predictive Oncology Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 13, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 13, 2025
AGPU$6.73+11.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-14.
0001171843-25-003182
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-13.
0001171843-25-005375
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 9 previous paragraphs and 19 current paragraphs.
3 unchanged; 5 reworded; 11 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (11)
Current report
On June 9, 2025, we received a letter from the Staff notifying us that because the Company had not regained compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement, the Staff determined to delist the Company’s securities from The Nasdaq Capital Market. On June 11, 2025, we submitted a hearing request to Nasdaq’s Hearings Panel (the “Panel”), which stayed the suspension of the Company’s securities and the filing of the Form 25-NSE pending the Panel’s decision. On June 12, 2025, we were notified that the Panel agreed to consider our appeal at an oral hearing, which the Panel scheduled for July 17, 2025. The Panel has discretion to take actions as prescribed by Nasdaq Listing Rule 5815(c)(1) including, but not limited to, granting an exception to the continued listing standards for a period not to exceed 180 days from the date of the Notice.
Current report
On July 8, 2025, we received a letter from the Staff indicating that the bid price for our common stock had closed below $1.00 per share for 30 consecutive business days, and that the Company is therefore not in compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. The notification had no immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s common stock. The Company has a period of 180 calendar days, or until January 5, 2026, to regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. We intend to continue actively monitoring the bid price for our common stock and will consider available options to resolve the deficiency and regain compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement.
Current report
On July 17, 2025, we attended an oral hearing with the Panel, where we presented plans for coming into compliance with the continued listing standards, which include, but are not limited to, continued sales of common stock pursuant to our at-the-market offering, sales of common stock pursuant to the SEPA, expanding availability of our live cell ChemoFx drug response assay and business collaborations, as well as a potential reverse stock split. We also requested an exception from the continued listing standards through December 8, 2025, to provide us the ability to evidence compliance with the standards.
Current report
On July 23, 2025, we were notified by Nasdaq that the Panel had granted our request for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market pursuant to an extension through December 8, 2025, to demonstrate compliance with all continued listing requirements, including the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement and Bid Price Requirement. We are pursuing several actions to timely satisfy the terms of the Panel’s decision; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so.
Current report
On August 7, 2025, we filed a preliminary proxy statement with the SEC for a special meeting of stockholders seeking, among other things, stockholder approval for (i) a reverse stock split of our outstanding common stock at a ratio of 1-for-15 and (ii) the issuance of up to $10 million of our common stock pursuant to the SEPA in order for us to sell to Yorkville shares in excess of the Exchange Cap. We intend to file a definitive proxy statement and hold the special meeting as soon as is practicable.
Current report
In an attempt to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s Minimum Bid Price Requirement, we have determined to pursue and conduct a 1-for-15 reverse stock split, the impact of which on the future market price of our common stock and our ability to maintain the listing of our common stock on Nasdaq will be uncertain.
Current report
We have determined to pursue and conduct a 1-for-15 reverse stock split in an attempt to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s Minimum Bid Price Requirement; however, we cannot assure stockholders that the proposed reverse stock split will be approved by stockholders, sufficiently increase our stock price, or be completed before Nasdaq commences delisting procedures related to the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. The effect of a reverse stock split on our stock price cannot be predicted with any certainty, and the history of reverse stock splits for other companies, including those in our industry, is varied, particularly since some investors may view a reverse stock split negatively. It is possible that our stock price after a reverse stock split will not increase in the same proportion as the reduction in the number of shares outstanding, causing a reduction in our overall market capitalization. Further, even if we implement a reverse stock split, our stock price may decline due to various factors, including our future performance and general industry, market and economic conditions. This percentage decline, as an absolute number and as a percentage of our overall market capitalization, may be greater than would occur in the absence of a reverse stock split.
Current report
In addition, a reverse stock split may decrease the liquidity of our common stock and result in higher transaction costs. The liquidity of our common stock may be negatively impacted by the reduced number of shares outstanding after a reverse stock split, which would be exacerbated if the stock price does not increase following the reverse stock split. In addition, a reverse stock split would increase the number of stockholders owning “odd lots” of fewer than 100 shares, trading in which generally results in higher transaction costs. Accordingly, a reverse stock split may not achieve the desired results of increasing marketability and liquidity.
Current report
The implementation of a reverse stock split would not have an effect on the actual or intrinsic value of our business or a stockholder’s proportional ownership interest (subject to the treatment of fractional shares). However, should the overall value of our common stock decline after a reverse stock split, then the actual or intrinsic value of shares held by stockholders will also proportionately decrease as a result of the overall decline in value.
Current report
We are pursuing alternatives to obtain additional funding for our business and to avoid delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market, which could change the nature of our business and your investment.
Current report
We continue to evaluate alternatives to obtain additional funding to maintain our future operations and to regain and maintain continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market. These alternatives could include transactions that result in a change to our business operations, capital or ownership structure, including those that make the continuation of the SEPA no longer necessary or advisable, or a transaction that results in our common stock no longer being listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market (notwithstanding our current intention to regain and maintain such listing), such as a merger or acquisition. The decision to pursue and enter into any such transaction will be made by management and our Board of Directors based on determinations of what is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. Depending on alternatives that may be pursued, and the timing of any such actions, the focus and nature of our business could ultimately be different than it is currently or at the time of investors’ purchases of shares, we may not be able to successfully implement any such alternatives, and investors purchasing shares may experience a decline in the value of their shares or lose their investment entirely.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
We may not be able to regain compliance. Even if we are able to regain compliance, we may subsequently fail to meet the requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq, and in either case, we may be delisted.
Reworded paragraphs (5)
Previous wording
As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2025, except as described below.
Current wording
As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, there have been no material changes to our risk factors from those disclosed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, filed with the SEC on March 31, 2025, other than as set forth below.
Previous wording
In May 2022 and again in September 2024, we received letters from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq (the “Staff”) informing us that because the closing bid price for our common stock listed on Nasdaq was below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, we did not comply with the minimum closing bid price requirement for continued listing under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), requiring a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). In both instances, we were able to regain compliance, first by conducting a 20-for-1 reverse stock split, which significantly increased our stock price, and then because since January 3, 2025, our stock price began trading above the minimum requirement, including as a result of our announcement of the proposed merger with Renovaro.
Current wording
On May 13, 2022, we received a letter from the Listing Qualifications Department of Nasdaq (the “Staff”) informing us that because the closing bid price for our common stock listed on Nasdaq was below $1.00 for 30 consecutive trading days, we did not comply with the minimum closing bid price requirement for continued listing under Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), requiring a minimum bid price of $1.00 per share (the “Minimum Bid Price Requirement”). The letter stated that we had 180 days, or until November 9, 2022, to regain compliance by maintaining a closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days. This deadline was subsequently extended by Nasdaq to May 8, 2023. On April 23, 2023, we effected a 20-for-1 reverse stock split to cure this deficiency. As a result, our stock price increased significantly, and we regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. After a subsequent decline in our stock price, on September 19, 2024, we received another letter from the Staff informing us that we did not meet the Minimum Bid Price Requirement. The letter stated that we had 180 days, or until March 18, 2025, to regain compliance by maintaining a closing bid price of at least $1.00 for a minimum of 10 consecutive trading days. We regained compliance with the Minimum Bid Price Requirement, as our stock price began trading above the minimum requirement.
Previous wording
On November 20, 2024, we received a letter from the Staff notifying us that we were not in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement for continued listing as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) (the “Stockholders’ Equity Requirement”), because our stockholders’ equity of $1,966,969, as reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024, was below the required minimum of $2.5 million, and because, as of the date of the notice, we did not meet either of the alternative compliance standards, relating to market value of listed securities of at least $35 million or net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years. Under Nasdaq rules and as specified in the notice, we had until Monday, January 6, 2025 to submit to Nasdaq a plan to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. We submitted our plan on January 6, 2025, citing the proposed merger with Renovaro, and after the Company’s decision to discontinue discussions with Renovaro, on April 10, 2025, submitted an update to Nasdaq that summarized fundraising activities during the three months ended March 31, 2025, the discontinuation of discussions with Renovaro, and options being considered by the Company to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement.
Current wording
On November 20, 2024, we received a letter from the Staff notifying us that we were not in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirement for continued listing as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(b)(1) (the “Stockholders’ Equity Requirement”), because our stockholders’ equity of $1,966,969, as reported in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2024, was below the required minimum of $2.5 million, and because, as of the date of the notice, we did not meet either of the alternative compliance standards, relating to market value of listed securities of at least $35 million or net income from continuing operations of $500,000 in the most recently completed fiscal year or in two of the last three most recently completed fiscal years. Under Nasdaq rules and as specified in the notice, we had until Monday, January 6, 2025 to submit to Nasdaq a plan to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. If our plan to regain compliance is accepted, Nasdaq may grant an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Notice for the Company to evidence compliance. We submitted our plan on January 6, 2025, citing the Company’s proposed merger with Renovaro, and requested a 180-day extension to regain compliance with the Stockholders’ Equity Requirement. In response, the Nasdaq requested upon execution, or by no later than March 1, 2025, a copy of the definitive merger documentation and a detailed timeline to complete the merger. On February 28, 2025, the Company notified the Staff that the Company continues to progress in discussions with Renovaro to finalize the merger. The Company also notified the Staff of the Extension Agreement entered into with Renovaro on February 28, 2025, which extended the outside termination date from February 28, 2025, to March 31, 2025. As a result of the termination of negotiations with Renovaro, we were unable to complete the previously submitted plan.
Previous wording
As previously disclosed, the letter of intent with Renovaro regarding a proposed merger transaction expired by its terms on March 31, 2025, and on April 3, 2025, our Board of Directors notified Renovaro of our decision to discontinue discussions regarding the proposed merger. On May 8, 2025, Renovaro filed a lawsuit alleging a breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We do not believe Renovaro’s claims have merit and intend to vigorously contest the lawsuit. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the merits, litigation can be costly and time-consuming for the Company. The diversion of management’s attention, the costs of defense and the possibility of an adverse decision could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Current wording
As previously disclosed, the letter of intent with Renovaro regarding a proposed merger transaction expired by its terms on March 31, 2025, and on April 3, 2025, our Board of Directors notified Renovaro of our decision to discontinue discussions regarding the proposed merger. On May 8, 2025, Renovaro filed a lawsuit alleging a breach of contract and the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. We do not believe Renovaro’s claims have merit and intend to continue to vigorously contest the lawsuit. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the merits, litigation can be costly and time-consuming for the Company. The diversion of management’s attention, the costs of defense and the possibility of an adverse decision could negatively impact the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
In addition to the foregoing risks, and the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the risks included in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 before making an investment decision. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment.
Current wording
In addition to the information set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the reader should carefully consider the risks included in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, before making an investment decision. Our business could be harmed by any of these risks. The trading price of our common stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment.