ITRON, INC.

The Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the effectiveness of the Company’s executive compensation program throughout the year. Details of the Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Compensation Committee’s charter, which may be accessed at our website, www.itron.com, by selecting “Investors Relations,” “Sustainability and Governance,” and then “Committee Composition.”

The Committee makes all final compensation and equity award decisions regarding our NEOs, except for the CEO, whose compensation is determined by the independent members of the full Board, based upon the recommendations of the Committee.

The Role of Management

Members of our management team attend regular Compensation Committee meetings where executive compensation, Company and individual performance, and competitive compensation levels and practices are discussed and evaluated. Only the Committee members can vote on decisions regarding NEO compensation.

The CEO reviews his recommendations pertaining to the compensation of the other NEOs with the Committee providing management input, transparency, and oversight. Approval of NEO compensation other than CEO compensation is made by the Committee. The CEO does not participate in the deliberations of the Committee regarding his own compensation. Independent members of the Board make all final determinations regarding CEO compensation.

The Role of the Independent Consultant

The Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to provide expertise on competitive pay practices, program design, and an objective assessment of any inherent risks of any programs. Pursuant to the authority granted to it under its charter, the Committee has hired FW Cook as its independent consultant. FW Cook reports directly to the Committee and does not provide any additional services to management. The Committee has conducted an independence assessment of FW Cook in accordance with SEC rules and concluded that FW Cook is independent.

The Role of Peer Companies

For some of our direct competitors who are not publicly held, or are smaller business units within a conglomerate, there is limited compensation information available. As a result, our peer companies for purposes of informing executive compensation (Peer Companies) generally consist of direct competitors for which public information is available or companies that compete for our talent, who are part of the same broad Standard & Poor’s (S&P) industry classifications of technology hardware and equipment or in software and services, and who are similar in size and scope of global operations as Itron. The Committee reviews the Peer Companies on an annual basis.

For the purpose of setting 2025 compensation, the Committee conducted an in-depth assessment of potential comparators to evaluate the degree to which the current Peer Companies are consistent with Itron’s growth and evolution. The Committee also took into consideration the broader marketplace to identify appropriate and relevant additions and removals from the current Peer Companies. As a result of this review, and in consultation with FW Cook, there were no changes to the Peer Companies for 2025:

For each of the Peer Companies, data regarding base salaries, annual incentives, and long-term incentives was obtained from their annual proxy statements and other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This data was supplemented with survey data from the Radford McLagan Compensation Database, which provides compensation market information on more than 2,400 technology companies, aggregated, and presented anonymously. The Radford Survey data was narrowed to those technology companies with revenues between $1 billion and $3 billion, similar to Itron.

With the support of FW Cook, the Committee evaluates this data for informational purposes when establishing a range of competitive compensation for our NEOs. For each NEO, the Committee determines the salary range, annual incentive target, and long-term incentive taking into consideration market data for the position being evaluated. However, market data is not the sole determinant of the Company’s practices or executive compensation levels. The Committee also considers the experience, performance, responsibilities, and contributions to the Company by each NEO when making its decisions. For the CEO, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board, and the independent members of the Board review and approve the CEO’s compensation.