Skip to main content

NBT BANCORP INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 27, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 27, 2026

NBTB$52.83-0.3%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-28.

0001140361-25-006528

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-27.

0001140361-26-007179

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 92 previous paragraphs and 72 current paragraphs.

62 unchanged; 10 reworded; 0 added; 20 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 37 previous and 26 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Removed paragraphs (20)

Previous report

Risks Related to the Merger with Evans

Previous report

The market price of the Company’s common stock may decline as a result of the Merger and the market price of the Company’s common stock after the consummation of the Merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the price of the Company’s common stock before the Merger.

Previous report

The market price of the Company’s common stock may decline as a result of the Merger if the Company does not achieve the perceived benefits of the Merger or the effect of the Merger on the Company’s financial results is not consistent with the expectations of financial or industry analysts.

Previous report

In addition, the consummation of the Merger will result in the combination of two companies that currently operate as independent companies. The business of the Company and the business of Evans differ. As a result, while the Company expects to benefit from certain synergies following the Merger, the Company may also encounter new risks and liabilities associated with these differences. Following the Merger, shareholders of the Company and Evans will own interests in a combined company operating an expanded business and may not wish to continue to invest in the Company, or for other reasons may wish to dispose of some or all of the Company’s common stock. If, following the effective time of the Merger, large amounts of the Company’s common stock are sold, the price of the Company’s common stock could decline.

Previous report

Further, the results of operations of the Company and the market price of the Company’s common stock after the Merger may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of each of the Company and Evans and the market price of the Company’s common stock. Accordingly, the Company’s historical market prices and financial results may not be indicative of these matters for the Company after the Merger.

Previous report

The Company and Evans can mutually agree to terminate the Merger Agreement at any time before the Merger has been completed, and either company can terminate the Merger Agreement if:

Previous report

In addition, the Company may terminate the Merger Agreement if:

Previous report

Failure to complete the Merger could negatively impact the stock price of the Company and its future business and financial results.

Previous report

Completion of the Merger is subject to the satisfaction or waiver of a number of conditions. The Company cannot guarantee when or if these conditions will be satisfied or that the Merger will be successfully completed. The consummation of the Merger may be delayed, the Merger may be consummated on terms different than those contemplated by the Merger Agreement, or the Merger may not be consummated at all. If the Merger is not completed, the ongoing business of the Company may be adversely affected, and the Company will be subject to several risks, including the following:

Previous report

In addition, if the Merger is not completed, the Company may experience negative reactions from the financial markets and from its customers and employees. The Company also could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or to enforcement proceedings commenced against the Company to perform its obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, the Company cannot assure its stockholders that the risks described above will not materialize and will not materially affect the Company’s business and financial results or the stock price of the Company.

Previous report

The integration of the Company and Evans will present significant challenges and expenses that may result in the combined business not operating as effectively as expected, or in the failure to achieve some or all of the anticipated benefits of the transaction.

Previous report

The benefits and synergies expected to result from the proposed Merger will depend in part on whether the operations of Evans can be integrated in a timely and efficient manner with those of the Company. The Company will face challenges and costs in consolidating its functions with those of Evans, and integrating the organizations, procedures and operations of the two businesses. The integration of the Company and Evans will be complex and time-consuming, and the management of both companies will have to dedicate substantial time and resources to it. These efforts could divert management’s focus and resources from serving existing customers or other strategic opportunities and from day-to-day operational matters during the integration process. Failure to successfully integrate the operations of the Company and Evans could result in the failure to achieve some of the anticipated benefits from the transaction, including cost savings and other operating efficiencies, and the Company may not be able to capitalize on the existing relationships of Evans to the extent anticipated, or it may take longer, or be more difficult or expensive than expected to achieve these goals. This could have an adverse effect on the business, results of operations, financial condition or prospects of the Company and/or the Bank after the transaction.

Previous report

Unanticipated costs relating to the Merger could reduce the Company’s future earnings per share.

Previous report

The Company has incurred substantial legal, accounting, financial advisory and other Merger-related costs, and management has devoted considerable time and effort in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is not completed, the Company will bear certain fees and expenses associated with the Merger without realizing the benefits of the Merger. If the Merger is completed, the Company expects to incur substantial expenses in connection with integrating the business, operations, network, systems, technologies, policies and procedures of the two companies. The fees and expenses may be significant and could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations.

Previous report

The Company believes that it has reasonably estimated the likely costs of integrating the operations of the Company and Evans, and the incremental costs of operating as a combined company. However, it is possible that unexpected transaction costs such as taxes, fees or professional expenses or unexpected future operating expenses such as increased personnel costs or increased taxes, as well as other types of unanticipated adverse developments, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the combined company. If unexpected costs are incurred, the Merger could have a dilutive effect on the Company’s EPS. In other words, if the Merger is completed, the EPS of the Company’s common stock could be less than anticipated or even less than if the Merger had not been completed.

Previous report

Estimates as to the future value of the combined company are inherently uncertain.

Previous report

Any estimates as to the future value of the combined company, including estimates regarding the EPS of the combined company, are inherently uncertain. The future value of the combined company will depend upon, among other factors, the combined company’s ability to achieve projected revenue and earnings expectations and to realize the anticipated synergies, all of which are subject to the risks and uncertainties described in these risk factors.

Previous report

Following the Merger, the Company may not continue to pay dividends at or above the rate currently paid.

Previous report

Following the Merger, the Company’s stockholders may not receive dividends at the same rate that they did as stockholders of the Company prior to the Merger for various reasons, including the following:

Previous report

The Company’s stockholders will have no contractual or other legal right to dividends that have not been declared by the Board.
Reworded paragraphs (10)

Previous wording

The Company’s success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in upstate New York, northeastern Pennsylvania, southern New Hampshire, western Massachusetts, Vermont, southern Maine, central and northwestern Connecticut and the specific local markets in which the Company operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Company provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in the upstate New York areas of Norwich, Syracuse, Oneonta, Amsterdam-Gloversville, Albany, Binghamton, Utica-Rome, Plattsburgh, Glens Falls, Hudson Valley and Ogdensburg-Massena, the northeastern Pennsylvania areas of Scranton and Wilkes-Barre, Berkshire County, Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, Vermont, southern Maine and central and northwestern Connecticut. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for the Company’s products and services as well as the ability of the Company’s customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of the Company’s deposit funding sources.

Current wording

The Company’s success depends primarily on the general economic conditions in upstate New York, northeastern Pennsylvania, southern New Hampshire, western Massachusetts, Vermont, southern Maine, central and northwestern Connecticut and the specific local markets in which the Company operates. Unlike larger national or other regional banks that are more geographically diversified, the Company provides banking and financial services to customers primarily in the upstate New York areas of Norwich, Albany, Amsterdam-Gloversville, Binghamton, Buffalo, Glens Falls, Hudson Valley, Ogdensburg-Massena, Oneonta, Plattsburgh, Rochester, Syracuse and Utica-Rome, the northeastern Pennsylvania areas of Scranton and Wilkes-Barre, Berkshire County, Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, Vermont, southern Maine and central and northwestern Connecticut. The local economic conditions in these areas have a significant impact on the demand for the Company’s products and services as well as the ability of the Company’s customers to repay loans, the value of the collateral securing loans and the stability of the Company’s deposit funding sources.

Previous wording

Our branch locations and our customers’ properties may be adversely impacted by flooding, wildfires, high winds and other effects of severe weather conditions that may be caused or exacerbated by climate change. These events can force property closures, result in property damage and/or result in delays in expansion, development or renovation of our properties and those of our customers. Even if these events do not directly impact our properties or our customers’ properties, they may impact us and our customers through increased insurance, energy or other costs. In addition, changes in laws or regulations, including federal, state or city laws, relating to climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our branch locations and/or our customers’ properties.

Current wording

Our branch locations and our customers’ properties may be adversely impacted by flooding, wildfires, high winds and other effects of severe weather conditions. These events can force property closures, result in property damage and/or result in delays in expansion, development or renovation of our properties and those of our customers. Even if these events do not directly impact our properties or our customers’ properties, they may impact us and our customers through increased insurance, energy or other costs. In addition, changes in laws or regulations, including federal, state or city laws, relating to climate change could result in increased capital expenditures to improve the energy efficiency of our branch locations and/or our customers’ properties.

Previous wording

Given that climate change could impose systemic risks upon the financial sector, either via disruptions in economic activity resulting from the physical impacts of climate change or changes in policies as the economy transitions to a less carbon-intensive environment, the Company may face regulatory risk of increasing focus on the Company’s resilience to climate-related risks, including in the context of stress testing for various climate stress scenarios. Ongoing legislative or regulatory uncertainties and changes regarding climate risk management and practices may result in higher regulatory, compliance, credit and reputational risks and costs.

Current wording

Ongoing legislative or regulatory uncertainties and changes regarding climate risk management and practices may result in higher regulatory, compliance, credit and reputational risks and costs.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, approximately 53% of the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial, agricultural, commercial construction and CRE loans. These types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than residential real estate loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property, the income stream of the borrowers and, for construction loans, the accuracy of the estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to residential real estate loans. Because the Company’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and industrial, agricultural, construction and CRE loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming loans. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for loan losses and/or an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. See the section captioned “Loans” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations located elsewhere in this report for further discussion related to our commercial and industrial, agricultural, construction and CRE loans.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, approximately 56% of the Company’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial, agricultural, commercial construction and CRE loans. These types of loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of non-payment and loss than residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on the successful operation of the property, the income stream of the borrowers and, for construction loans, the accuracy of the estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to residential mortgage loans. Because the Company’s loan portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and industrial, agricultural, construction and CRE loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming loans. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for loan losses and/or an increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. See the section captioned “Loans” in Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations located elsewhere in this report for further discussion related to our commercial and industrial, agricultural, construction and CRE loans.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had total assets of approximately $13.79 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act, including the Durbin Amendment, and its implementing regulations impose enhanced supervisory requirements on bank holding companies with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets. For bank holding companies with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, such requirements include, among other things:

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had total assets of approximately $16.00 billion. The Dodd-Frank Act, including the Durbin Amendment, and its implementing regulations impose enhanced supervisory requirements on bank holding companies with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets. For bank holding companies with more than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, such requirements include, among other things:

Previous wording

The EGRRCPA, which was enacted in 2018, amended the Dodd-Frank Act to raise the $10 billion stress testing threshold to $250 billion, among other things. The federal financial regulators issued final rules in 2019 to increase the threshold for these stress testing requirements from $10 billion to $250 billion, consistent with the EGRRCPA.

Current wording

The Economic Growth, Regulatory Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“EGRRCPA”), which was enacted in 2018, amended the Dodd-Frank Act to raise the $10 billion stress testing threshold to $250 billion, among other things. The federal financial regulators issued final rules in 2019 to increase the threshold for these stress testing requirements from $10 billion to $250 billion, consistent with the EGRRCPA.

Previous wording

The Company owns common stock of FHLB of New York in order to qualify for membership in the FHLB system, which enables it to borrow funds under the FHLB of New York’s advance program. The carrying value and fair value of our FHLB of New York common stock was $10.6 million as of December 31, 2024. There are 11 branches of the FHLB, including New York, which are jointly liable for the consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. To the extent that one FHLB branch cannot meet its obligations to pay its share of the system’s debt, other FHLB branches can be called upon to make the payment. Any adverse effects on the FHLB of New York could adversely affect the value of our investment in its common stock and negatively impact our results of operations.

Current wording

The Company owns common stock of FHLB of New York in order to qualify for membership in the FHLB system, which enables it to borrow funds under the FHLB of New York’s advance program. The carrying value and fair value of our FHLB of New York common stock was $13.6 million as of December 31, 2025. There are 11 branches of the FHLB, including New York, which are jointly liable for the consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. To the extent that one FHLB branch cannot meet its obligations to pay its share of the system’s debt, other FHLB branches can be called upon to make the payment. Any adverse effects on the FHLB of New York could adversely affect the value of our investment in its common stock and negatively impact our results of operations.

Previous wording

We depend upon data processing, communication systems, and information exchange on a variety of platforms and networks and over the internet to conduct business operations. In addition, we rely on the services of a variety of vendors to meet our data processing and communication needs. Although we require third party providers to maintain certain levels of security, such providers remain vulnerable to breaches, security incidents, system unavailability or other malicious attacks that could compromise sensitive information. Further, new technologies such as artificial intelligence (“AI”) may be more capable at evading safeguard measures. The risk of experiencing security incidents and disruptions, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions by organized crime, hackers, terrorists, nation-states, activists and other external parties has increased. These security incidents may result in disruption of our operations; material harm to our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common stock; misappropriation of assets; compromise or corruption of confidential information; liability for information or assets stolen during the incident; remediation costs; increased cybersecurity and insurance costs; regulatory enforcement; litigation; and damage to our stakeholder and customer relationships.

Current wording

We depend upon data processing, communication systems, and information exchange on a variety of platforms and networks and over the internet to conduct business operations. In addition, we rely on the services of a variety of vendors to meet our data processing and communication needs. Although we require third party providers to maintain certain levels of security, such providers remain vulnerable to breaches, security incidents, system unavailability or other malicious attacks that could compromise sensitive information. Further, new technologies such as AI may be more capable of evading safeguard measures. The risk of experiencing security incidents and disruptions, particularly through cyber-attacks or cyber intrusions, has generally increased as the number, intensity and sophistication of attempted attacks and intrusions by organized crime, hackers, terrorists, nation-states, activists and other external parties has increased. These security incidents may result in disruption of our operations; material harm to our financial condition, cash flows and the market price of our common stock; misappropriation of assets; compromise or corruption of confidential information; liability for information or assets stolen during the incident; remediation costs; increased cybersecurity and insurance costs; regulatory enforcement; litigation; and damage to our stakeholder and customer relationships.

Previous wording

We or our third-party providers may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products. The development and use of AI poses a number of risks and challenges to our business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, and we may be subject to increasing regulations related to our use of these technologies, including regulations related to privacy, data security, and intellectual property rights, which could expose us to legal risks. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce incorrect, biased, or misleading results, expose confidential information, or infringe on intellectual property rights. Further, we may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be subject to additional risks, including limited oversight of how these models are developed and trained and potential exposure to unauthorized data usage. If our AI models, or those developed by third parties, produce inaccurate or controversial results, we could face legal liability, regulatory scrutiny, reputational harm, or operational inefficiencies. These risks could negatively impact our business, financial results, and the perception of our security measures.

Current wording

We or our third-party providers may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products. The development and use of AI poses a number of risks and challenges to our business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, and we may be subject to increasing regulations related to our use of these technologies, including regulations related to privacy, data security, and intellectual property rights, which could expose us to legal risks. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce incorrect, biased, or misleading results, expose confidential information, or infringe on intellectual property rights. Further, we may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be subject to additional risks, including limited oversight of how these models are developed and trained and potential exposure to unauthorized data usage. If our AI models, or those developed by third parties, produce inaccurate or controversial results, we could face legal liability, regulatory scrutiny, reputational harm, or operational inefficiencies. These risks could negatively impact our business, financial results, and the perception of our security measures. The Company’s use of AI currently varies across platforms, with certain third party systems incorporating AI capabilities into routine business operations. As our adoption and internal development of AI enabled tools continues to evolve, we evaluate these technologies through our established Solutions Development Lifecycle (SDLC), which includes model validation and other risk management controls.

Previous wording

The business strategy of the Company has included and may continue to include growth through acquisition. Any acquisitions (including the acquisition of Evans) will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions. These risks may include, among other things:

Current wording

The business strategy of the Company has included and may continue to include growth through acquisition. Any acquisitions will be accompanied by the risks commonly encountered in acquisitions. These risks may include, among other things: