LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORP

Previous wording

If we are found to have not satisfied the HEA or the DOE's requirements for Title IV Programs funding, one or more of our institutions, including its additional locations, could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding, which could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 81% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. If we or any of our schools fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or accrediting agency requirements, our regulators could take a variety of adverse actions against us, and our schools could be subject to, among other things, a) the loss of, or placement of material restrictions or conditions on (i) state licensure or accreditation, (ii) eligibility to participate in and receive funds under the Title IV Programs or other federal or state financial assistance programs, or (iii) capacity to grant degrees, diplomas and certificates or b) the imposition of liabilities or monetary penalties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on academic or operational initiatives, revenues or financial condition, and impose significant operating restrictions upon us. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Other Financial Assistance Programs.”

Current wording

If we are found to have not satisfied the HEA or the DOE's requirements for Title IV Programs funding, one or more of our institutions, including its additional locations, could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding, which could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 82% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, and have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. If we or any of our schools fail to comply with applicable federal, state, or accrediting agency requirements, our regulators could take a variety of adverse actions against us, and our schools could be subject to, among other things, a) the loss of, or placement of material restrictions or conditions on (i) state licensure or accreditation, (ii) eligibility to participate in and receive funds under the Title IV Programs or other federal or state financial assistance programs, or (iii) capacity to grant degrees, diplomas and certificates or b) the imposition of liabilities or monetary penalties, or a requirement to provide a letter of credit or other financial protection, any of which could have a material adverse effect on academic or operational initiatives, revenues or financial condition, and impose significant operating restrictions upon us. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Compliance with Regulatory Standards and Effect of Regulatory Violations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Other Financial Assistance Programs.”

Previous wording

If we are found not to have satisfied the DOE’s “administrative capability” requirements, or to have otherwise failed to comply with one or more DOE requirements, one or more of our institutions and its additional locations could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding. This could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 81% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs in 2023, which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. The DOE has placed all of our institutions on provisional certification based on findings in recent audits of the institutions’ Title IV compliance that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies in regulations related to DOE regulations regarding an institutions’ level of administrative capability. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”

Current wording

If we are found not to have satisfied the DOE’s “administrative capability” requirements, or to have otherwise failed to comply with one or more DOE requirements, one or more of our institutions and its additional locations could be limited in its access to, or lose, Title IV Program funding. This could adversely affect our revenue, as we received approximately 82% of our revenue (calculated based on cash receipts) from Title IV Programs in 2024, which would have a significant impact on our business and results of operations. The DOE has placed all of our institutions in provisional certification status based on findings in recent audits of the institutions’ Title IV compliance that the DOE alleges identified deficiencies in regulations related to DOE regulations regarding an institutions’ level of administrative capability. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.”

Previous wording

Congress and the DOE may make changes to the laws and regulations applicable to, or reduce funding for, Title IV Programs, which could reduce our student population, revenues or profit margin.

Current wording

Congress, the President and the DOE may make changes to the DOE or the laws and regulations applicable to, or reduce funding for, Title IV Programs, which could reduce our student population, revenues or profit margin.

Previous wording

Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. We cannot predict what, if any, legislative or other actions will be taken or proposed by Congress in connection with the reauthorization of the HEA or other such activities of Congress, although Congress recently made a change to the 90/10 Rule that will make it harder for schools like ours that are subject to the rule to comply with the rule. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Congressional Action.” Because a significant percentage of our revenues is derived from the Title IV Programs, any action by Congress or the DOE that significantly reduces funding for Title IV Programs or that limits the ability of our schools, programs, or students to receive funding through such programs or that imposes new restrictions upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues, increase our administrative costs, require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students, and require us to modify our practices in order to fully comply. In addition, current requirements for Title IV Program participation may change or the present Title IV Programs could be replaced by other programs with materially different eligibility requirements. The potential for changes that may be adverse to us and other for-profit schools like ours may increase as a result of changes in political leadership. The DOE continues to engage in a process to establish new regulations that have increased, and will continue to increase, the number and scope of regulatory requirements applicable to our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” If we cannot comply with the provisions of the HEA and the regulations of the DOE, as they may be revised, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, our revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.

Current wording

Congress periodically revises the HEA and other laws governing Title IV Programs and annually determines the funding level for each Title IV Program. We cannot predict what, if any, legislative or other actions will be taken or proposed by Congress in connection with the reauthorization of the HEA or other such activities of Congress, although Congress recently made a change to the 90/10 Rule that will make it harder for schools like ours that are subject to the rule to comply with the rule. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Congressional Action.” Similarly, the President could issue executive orders or take other actions and the DOE could establish new regulations, that could make it more difficult for our schools to operate and comply with applicable regulations. Moreover, Congress, or the President, could take action to downsize or eliminate the DOE or transfer some or all of the DOE’s authority or responsibilities to another agency or to the States. Because a significant percentage of our revenues is derived from the Title IV Programs, any action by Congress, the President, or the DOE that significantly reduces funding for Title IV Programs or that limits the ability of our schools, programs, or students to receive funding through such programs, that disrupts the operations of such programs, or that imposes new restrictions upon our business or operations could reduce our student enrollment and our revenues, increase our administrative costs, require us to arrange for alternative sources of financial aid for our students, and require us to modify our practices in order to fully comply. In addition, current requirements for Title IV Program participation may change or the present Title IV Programs could be replaced by other programs with materially different eligibility requirements. The potential for changes to the DOE or the Title IV Programs that may be adverse to us and other for-profit schools like ours may increase as a result of changes in political leadership. The DOE continues to engage in a process to establish new regulations that have increased, and will continue to increase, the number and scope of regulatory requirements applicable to our schools. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot predict the scope, timing or likelihood of future actions and changes by Congress, the President or the DOE with respect to the operations or existence of the DOE or the laws and regulations applicable to and the funding for the Title IV Programs. If we cannot comply with the provisions of the HEA and the regulations of the DOE, as they may be revised, or with the terms of an executive order or other executive action, or if the cost of such compliance is excessive, or if funding is materially reduced, or if funding is materially reduced or disrupted by changes to Title IV Programs, our revenues or profit margin could be materially adversely affected.

Previous wording

The DOE’s current Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a covered party. The current regulations also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans. The regulations regarding Borrower Defense to Repayment and regarding closed school loan discharges are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges. The implementation and enforcement of these Borrower Defense to Repayment and closed school loan discharge regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Closed School Loan Discharges.”

Current wording

The DOE’s Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish processes for borrowers to receive from the DOE a discharge of the obligation to repay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the institution or a covered party. The regulations also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans. The regulations regarding Borrower Defense to Repayment and regarding closed school loan discharges are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges. The implementation and enforcement of these Borrower Defense to Repayment and closed school loan discharge regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Closed School Loan Discharges.”

Previous wording

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and, potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications, even though we have appealed the District Court’s judgment approving the settlement.

Current wording

The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) has approved a class action settlement that could result in the granting of all borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning our institutions and, potentially, could lead to the DOE seeking recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the granted applications.

Previous wording

On June 22, 2022, the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE in federal court in California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) and the DOE announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims that the DOE has failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, it set forth a list of approximately 150 institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full.

Current wording

On June 22, 2022, the DOE and the plaintiff student loan borrowers in a class action against the DOE initiated on June 25, 2019 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) announced a proposed settlement agreement to resolve claims that the DOE had failed to timely decide Borrower Defense to Repayment applications submitted to the DOE. The proposed settlement included three categories of relief for student loan borrowers. First, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund prior loan payments to class members with loan debt associated with an institution on the list included in the settlement (which includes Lincoln institutions). The class action plaintiffs and the DOE stated that the DOE had determined that attendance at one of the listed institutions justifies presumptive relief allegedly based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the purportedly high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. Second, the proposed settlement included new procedures for the DOE to resolve pending borrower defense claims associated with other schools not on the list. Third, for any student loan borrower who submitted a borrower defense application after June 22, 2022 and before the final approval of the settlement, the proposed settlement would require the DOE to review the applications under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards and issue decisions within 36 months, or else the applications would be discharged in full. On November 16, 2022, the federal district court approved the settlement as proposed and the DOE began implementing the settlement relief while Lincoln and other parties appealed the settlement’s final approval to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On November 5, 2024, the Ninth Circuit upheld the settlement on appeal. One or more schools are expected to continue to appeal the final approval of the settlement, but Lincoln does not intend to continue participating in the appeal. As a result of this final approval, the DOE has estimated that approximately 196,000 student loan borrowers who attended one of the listed schools (including Lincoln institutions) will receive automatic student loan discharges; that another approximately 100,000 student loan borrowers who attended other schools not on the list would receive decisions under new procedures; and that approximately 250,000 student loan borrowers who submitted borrower defense applications between June 22, 2022 and November 16, 2022 would receive decisions under the DOE’s 2016 regulatory standards within 36 months or else receive automatic student loan discharges.

Previous wording

It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will be upheld on appeal, what actions the DOE might take if the settlement is upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions before the appeal is decided. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Even if the Ninth Circuit rules in our favor and if the approval of the settlement is overturned, the DOE already may have discharged by that time the loans associated with some or all of the pending applications. We have seen evidence that the DOE already may have discharged some of the loans associated with some of the pending applications, but the DOE has not furnished definitive data to us necessary to determine the extent to which applications have been granted. The DOE may or may not attempt to seek recoupment from applicable schools relating to approval of borrower defense applications. The settlement also requires the DOE to review and decide borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and before November 16, 2022 within 36 months of the final settlement date. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts relating to these applications. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider our options for challenging the legal and factual bases for such actions.

Current wording

It is not possible at this time to predict whether the settlement will continue to be upheld on appeal, what additional actions the DOE might take as the settlement continues to be upheld on appeal, or whether the DOE or other agencies might take actions against Lincoln institutions. Such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We believe the DOE already may have discharged some or all of the pending applications. See Part I, Item I. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations.”

Previous wording

On October 10, 2023, the DOE published final gainful employment regulations on October 10, 2023 which have a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and which establish rules for annually evaluating each of our educational programs based on the calculation of debt-to-earnings rates (an annual debt-to-earnings rate and a discretionary debt-to-earnings rate) and a median earnings measure under complex regulatory formulas outlined in the regulations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment.” If one or more of our educational programs were to yield debt-to-earnings rates or a median earnings measure that do not comply with regulatory benchmarks for two of three consecutive years, we would lose Title IV eligibility for each of the impacted educational programs. The regulations will also require us to provide warnings to current and prospective students for programs in danger of losing of Title IV eligibility (which could deter prospective students from enrolling and current students from continuing their respective programs). The regulations also include provisions for providing certifications and reporting data to the DOE and providing required student disclosures related to gainful employment.

Current wording

On October 10, 2023, the DOE published final gainful employment and financial value transparency regulations, which had a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and which establish rules for annually evaluating each of our educational programs based on the calculation of debt-to-earnings rates (an annual debt-to-earnings rate and a discretionary debt-to-earnings rate) and an earnings premium measure based on an evaluation of median annual earnings under complex regulatory formulas outlined in the regulations. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment.” If one or more of our educational programs were to yield debt-to-earnings rates or an earnings premium measure that do not comply with regulatory benchmarks for two of three consecutive years, we would lose Title IV eligibility for each of the impacted educational programs. The regulations will also require us to provide warnings to current and prospective students for programs in danger of losing of Title IV eligibility (which could deter prospective students from enrolling and current students from continuing their respective programs). The regulations also include provisions for providing certifications and reporting data to the DOE and providing required student disclosures related to gainful employment.

Previous wording

The DOE periodically issues new regulations and guidance that can have an adverse effect on our institutions. We cannot predict the timing and content of any new regulations or guidance that the DOE may seek to impose or whether and to what extent the DOE may issue new regulations and guidance that could adversely impact for-profit schools including our institutions. The DOE recently published new regulations on a variety of topics with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and is currently engaged in additional rulemaking processes in 2024 that are expected to result in new regulations on a broad range of topics that could adversely impact institutions including our institutions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.”

Current wording

The DOE periodically issues new regulations and guidance that can have an adverse effect on our institutions. We cannot predict the timing and content of any new regulations or guidance that the DOE may seek to impose or whether and to what extent the DOE may issue new regulations and guidance that could adversely impact for-profit schools including our institutions. The DOE recently published new regulations on a variety of topics with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 and other regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2026 and could engage in additional rulemaking processes in the future that could result in new regulations that could adversely impact institutions including our institutions. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.”

Previous wording

A proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed on provisional certification and may be subject to other enforcement measures.

Current wording

A proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed in provisional certification status and may be subject to other enforcement measures.

Previous wording

In March 2021, the ARPA amended the 90/10 Rule by treating other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV funds are currently treated in the 90/10 Rule calculation. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule.” The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 Rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. The DOE published new final 90/10 Rule regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The 90/10 Rule regulations could have a materially adverse effect on us and other schools like ours. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot be certain that the changes we make to our operations in the future to address the new 90/10 Rule regulations will succeed in maintaining our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages below required levels or that the changes will not materially impact our business operations, revenues, and operating costs. It also is possible that Congress or the DOE could amend the 90/10 Rule in the future to lower the 90% threshold, change the calculation methodology, or make other changes to the 90/10 Rule that could make it more difficult for our institutions to comply with the 90/10 Rule. If any of our institutions loses eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs, that loss would also adversely affect our students’ access to various government-sponsored student financial aid programs, and would have a significant impact on the rate at which our students enroll in our programs and on our business and results of operations.

Current wording

In March 2021, the ARPA amended the 90/10 Rule by treating other “federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV funds are currently treated in the 90/10 Rule calculation. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule.” The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 Rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. The DOE published new final 90/10 Rule regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The 90/10 Rule regulations could have a materially adverse effect on us and other schools like ours. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – 90/10 Rule” and “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.” We cannot be certain that the changes we make to our operations in the future to address the new 90/10 Rule regulations will succeed in maintaining our institutions’ 90/10 Rule percentages below required levels or that the changes will not materially impact our business operations, revenues, and operating costs. It also is

Previous wording

An institution participating in Title IV Programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been credited to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them and must return those unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of such student’s withdrawal. If the unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned, we may have to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE or may be otherwise sanctioned by the DOE, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations. Based upon the findings of an annual Title IV Program compliance audit of our Columbia and Iselin institutions, we are required to maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $600,020 to the DOE. More recently, the DOE is engaged in a negotiated rulemaking process on a number of topics including plans to amend the regulations on the requirements for institutions to return unearned Title IV funds to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them. We cannot predict the ultimate timing, content or impact of any regulations that the DOE might publish on this topic. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Return of Title IV Program Funds.”

Current wording

An institution participating in Title IV Programs must correctly calculate the amount of unearned Title IV Program funds that have been credited to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them and must return those unearned funds in a timely manner, generally within 45 days of such student’s withdrawal. If the unearned funds are not properly calculated and timely returned, we may have to post a letter of credit in favor of the DOE or may be otherwise sanctioned by the DOE, which could increase our cost of regulatory compliance and adversely affect our results of operations. Based upon the findings of an annual Title IV Program compliance audit of our Columbia and Iselin institutions, we are required to maintain a letter of credit in the amount of $600,020 to the DOE. More recently, on January 3, 2025, the DOE issued amendments to the regulations on the requirements for institutions to return unearned Title IV funds to students who withdraw from their educational programs before completing them. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Return of Title IV Program Funds.”

Previous wording

All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” The DOE typically places an institution on provisional certification following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, and may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons including, but not limited to, failure to comply with certain standards of administrative capability or financial responsibility. During the time when an institution is provisionally certified, it may be subject to adverse action with fewer due process rights than those afforded to other institutions. In addition, an institution that is provisionally certified must apply for and receive approval from the DOE for certain substantive changes including, but not limited to, the establishment of an additional location, an increase in the level of academic offerings or the addition of new programs. The DOE published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 that, among other issues, establish rules to authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions and expand existing regulations regarding administrative capability and financial responsibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Any adverse action by the DOE or increased regulatory burdens as a result of the provisional status of one of our institutions could have a material adverse effect on enrollments and our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Current wording

All of our institutions are provisionally certified by the DOE. See Part I, Item 1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” The DOE typically places an institution in provisional certification status following a change in ownership resulting in a change of control, and may provisionally certify an institution for other reasons including, but not limited to, failure to comply with certain standards of administrative capability or financial responsibility. During the time when an institution is provisionally certified, it may be subject to adverse action with fewer due process rights than those afforded to other institutions. In addition, an institution that is provisionally certified must apply for and receive approval from the DOE for certain substantive changes including, but not limited to, the establishment of an additional location, an increase in the level of academic offerings or the addition of new programs. The DOE published final regulations with a general effective date of July 1, 2024 that, among other issues, establish rules to authorize additional conditions and restrictions on provisionally certified institutions and expand existing regulations regarding administrative capability and financial responsibility. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Regulation of Federal Student Financial Aid Programs.” Any adverse action by the DOE or increased regulatory burdens as a result of the provisional certification status of one of our institutions could have a material adverse effect on enrollments and our revenues, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Previous wording

Changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.

Current wording

Changes in the executive branch of our federal government as a result of the outcome of elections or other events could result in further legislation, appropriations, executive orders, regulations and enforcement actions that could materially or adversely affect our business.

Previous wording

Our industry is subject to an intensive ongoing federal and state regulatory environment that affects our industry. The composition of federal and state executive offices, executive agencies and legislatures that are subject to change based on the results of elections, appointments and other events, may adversely impact our industry through constant changes in that regulatory environment resulting from the disparate views towards the for-profit education industry. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Any laws that are adopted that limit our or our students’ participation in Title IV Programs or in programs to provide funds for active duty service members and veterans or the amount of student financial aid for which our students are eligible, or any decreases in enrollment related to the congressional activity concerning this sector, could have a material adverse effect on our academic or operational initiatives, cash flows, results of operations, or financial condition.

Current wording

Our industry is subject to an intensive ongoing federal and state regulatory environment that affects our industry. The composition of federal and state executive offices, executive agencies and legislatures that are subject to change based on the results of elections, appointments and other events, may adversely impact our industry through constant changes in that regulatory environment resulting from the disparate views towards the for-profit education industry. See Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Scrutiny of the For-Profit Postsecondary Education Sector.” Any laws or other actions that are adopted that limit our or our students’ participation in Title IV Programs or in programs to provide funds for active duty service members and veterans or the amount of student financial aid for which our students are eligible, or any decreases in enrollment related to the congressional activity concerning this sector, could have a material adverse effect on our academic or operational initiatives, cash flows, results of operations, or financial condition.

Previous wording

Public health pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks, including the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Current wording

Public health pandemics, epidemics or outbreaks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

Previous wording

The post-secondary education market is highly competitive. We compete for students and faculty with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges and universities and other proprietary schools, many of which have greater financial resources than we do. Some traditional public and private colleges and universities, as well as other private career-oriented schools, offer programs that may be perceived by students to be similar to ours. Most public institutions are able to charge lower tuition than our schools, due in part to government subsidies and other financial resources not available to for-profit schools. Some of our competitors also have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have which may, among other things, allow our competitors to secure strategic relationships with some or all of our existing strategic partners or develop other high profile strategic relationships, or devote more resources to expanding their programs and their school network, or provide greater financing alternatives to their students, all of which could affect the success of our marketing programs. In addition, some of our competitors have a larger network of schools and campuses than we do, enabling them to recruit students more effectively from a wider geographic area. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.

Current wording

The postsecondary education market is highly competitive. We compete for students and faculty with traditional public and private two-year and four-year colleges and universities and other proprietary schools, many of which have greater financial resources than we do. Some traditional public and private colleges and universities, as well as other private career-oriented schools, offer programs that may be perceived by students to be similar to ours. Most public institutions are able to charge lower tuition than our schools, due in part to government subsidies and other financial resources not available to for-profit schools. Some of our competitors also have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have which may, among other things, allow our competitors to secure strategic relationships with some or all of the companies with which we have existing relationships or develop other high profile strategic relationships, or devote more resources to expanding their programs and their school network, or provide greater financing alternatives to their students, all of which could affect the success of our marketing programs. In addition, some of our competitors have a larger network of schools and campuses than we do, enabling them to recruit students more effectively from a wider geographic area. This strong competition could adversely affect our business.

Previous wording

Our students and their families have benefitted from historic lows on student loan interest rates in recent years. Much of the financing our students receive is tied to floating interest rates. Recently, however, student loan interest rates have been edging higher, making borrowing for education more expensive. Increases in interest rates result in a corresponding increase in the cost to our existing and prospective students of financing their education, which could result in a reduction in the number of students attending our schools and could adversely affect our results of operations and revenues. Higher interest rates could also contribute to higher default rates with respect to our students' repayment of their educational loans. Higher default rates may in turn adversely impact our eligibility for Title IV Program participation or the willingness of private lenders to make private loan programs available to students who attend our schools, which could result in a reduction in our student population.

Current wording

Our students and their families have benefitted from historic lows on student loan interest rates in prior years. Much of the financing our students receive is tied to floating interest rates. Recently, student loan interest rates have been higher, making borrowing for education more expensive. Increases in interest rates result in a corresponding increase in the cost to our existing and prospective students of financing their education, which could result in a reduction in the number of students attending our schools and could adversely affect our results of operations and revenues. Higher interest rates could also contribute to higher default rates with respect to our students' repayment of their educational loans. Higher default rates may in turn adversely impact our eligibility for Title IV Program participation or the willingness of private lenders to make private loan programs available to students who attend our schools, which could result in a reduction in our student population.

Previous wording

The consumer credit markets in the United States have recently suffered from increases in default rates and foreclosures on mortgages. Adverse market conditions for consumer and federally guaranteed student loans could result in providers of alternative loans reducing the attractiveness and/or decreasing the availability of alternative loans to post-secondary students, including students with low credit scores who would not otherwise be eligible for credit-based alternative loans. Prospective students may find that these increased financing costs make borrowing prohibitively expensive and abandon or delay enrollment in post-secondary education programs. Private lenders could also require that we pay them new or increased fees in order to provide alternative loans to prospective students. If any of these scenarios were to occur, our students’ ability to finance their education could be adversely affected and our student population could decrease, which could have a significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Current wording

The consumer credit markets in the United States have recently suffered from increases in default rates and foreclosures on mortgages. Adverse market conditions for consumer and federally guaranteed student loans could result in providers of alternative loans reducing the attractiveness and/or decreasing the availability of alternative loans to postsecondary students, including students with low credit scores who would not otherwise be eligible for credit-based alternative loans. Prospective students may find that these increased financing costs make borrowing prohibitively expensive and abandon or delay enrollment in postsecondary education programs. Private lenders could also require that we pay them new or increased fees in order to provide alternative loans to prospective students. If any of these scenarios were to occur, our students’ ability to finance their education could be adversely affected and our student population could decrease, which could have a significant impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Previous wording

Our success has depended, and will continue to depend, largely on the skills, efforts and motivation of our executive officers who generally have significant experience within the post-secondary education industry. Our success also depends in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified faculty, school directors, administrators and corporate management. Due to the nature of our business, we face significant competition in the attraction and retention of personnel who possess the skill sets that we seek. In addition, key personnel may leave us and subsequently compete against us. Furthermore, we do not currently carry "key man" life insurance on any of our employees. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other qualified and experienced personnel on acceptable terms, could have an adverse effect on our ability to operate our business efficiently and to execute our growth strategy.

Current wording

Our success has depended, and will continue to depend, largely on the skills, efforts and motivation of our executive officers who generally have significant experience within the postsecondary education industry. Our success also depends in large part upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified faculty, school directors, administrators and corporate management. Due to the nature of our business, we face significant competition in the attraction and retention of personnel who possess the skill sets that we seek. In addition, key personnel may leave us and subsequently compete against us. Furthermore, we do not currently carry "key man" life insurance on any of our employees. The loss of the services of any of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other qualified and experienced personnel on acceptable terms, could have an adverse effect on our ability to operate our business efficiently and to execute our growth strategy.

Previous wording

Our total assets include a substantial amount of goodwill. In the event that our schools do not achieve satisfactory operating results, we may be required to write-off a significant portion of the goodwill which would negatively affect our results of operations.

Current wording

Our total assets include goodwill. In the event that our schools do not achieve satisfactory operating results, we may be required to write-off a significant portion of the goodwill which would negatively affect our results of operations.

Previous wording

Our total assets reflect substantial amount of goodwill. At December 31, 2023 goodwill associated with our acquisitions decreased to approximately 3.1% from 5.0% of total assets at December 31, 2022. On at least an annual basis, we assess whether there has been an impairment in the value of goodwill. If the carrying value of the tested asset exceeds its estimated fair value, impairment is deemed to have occurred. In this event, the amount is written down to fair value. Under current accounting rules, this would result in a charge to operating earnings. Any determination requiring the write-off of a significant portion of goodwill would negatively affect our results of operations and total capitalization, which could be material. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 7 Goodwill.”

Current wording

Our total assets reflect amounts for goodwill. At December 31, 2024, goodwill associated with our acquisitions decreased to approximately 2.5% from 3.1% of total assets at December 31, 2023. On at least an annual basis, we assess whether there has been an impairment in the value of goodwill. If the carrying value of the tested asset exceeds its estimated fair value, impairment is deemed to have occurred. In this event, the amount is written down to fair value. Under current accounting rules, this would result in a charge to operating earnings. Any determination requiring the write-off of goodwill would negatively affect our results of operations and total capitalization, which could be material. See Part II. Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplemental Data - Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 7 Goodwill.”

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2023, the teaching professionals at six of our campuses are represented by unions and covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire between 2024 and 2026. Although we believe that we have good relationships with these unions and with our employees, any strikes or work stoppages by our employees could adversely impact our relationships with our students, hinder our ability to conduct business and increase costs.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2024, the teaching professionals at seven of our campuses are represented by unions and covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire between 2025 and 2027. The faculty of the Company’s Union, New Jersey campus voted to be represented through collective bargaining in 2024. Although we believe that we have good relationships with these unions and with our employees, any strikes or work stoppages by our employees could adversely impact our relationships with our students, hinder our ability to conduct business and increase costs.

Previous wording

Substantially all of our campuses are located at leased premises in various areas some of which can experience hurricanes, severe storms, floods, coastal storms, tornadoes, power outages and other severe weather events. If these events were to occur and cause damage to our campus facilities, or limit the ability of our students or faculty to participate in or contribute to our academic programs or our ability to comply with federal and state educational requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Disruptions of this kind may also result in increases in student attrition, voluntary or mandatory closure of some or all of our facilities, or our inability to procure essential supplies or travel during the pendency of mandated travel restrictions. We may not be able to effectively shift our operations due to disruptions arising from the occurrence of such events, and our business and results of operations could be affected adversely as a result. Moreover, damage to or total destruction of our campus facilities from various weather events may not be covered in whole or in part by any insurance we may have.

Current wording

All of our campuses are located at leased premises in various areas some of which can experience hurricanes, severe storms, floods, coastal storms, tornadoes, power outages and other severe weather events. If these events were to occur and cause damage to our campus facilities, or limit the ability of our students or faculty to participate in or contribute to our academic programs or our ability to comply with federal and state educational requirements, our business may be adversely affected. Disruptions of this kind may also result in increases in student attrition, voluntary or mandatory closure of some or all of our facilities, or our inability to procure essential supplies or travel during the pendency of mandated travel restrictions. We may not be able to effectively shift our operations due to disruptions arising from the occurrence of such events, and our business and results of operations could be affected adversely as a result. Moreover, damage to or total destruction of our campus facilities from various weather events may not be covered in whole or in part by any insurance we may have.

Previous wording

Our business could be negatively impacted by cyber and other security threats or disruptions.

Current wording

Our business could be negatively impacted by cybersecurity and other security threats or disruptions.

Previous wording

Our students and corporate business partners to whom we entrust confidential data, and on whom we rely to provide services, face similar threats and growing requirements, including ones for which others may seek to hold us responsible. We depend on our students, suppliers, and other business partners to implement and verify adequate controls and safeguards to protect against and report cybersecurity incidents. If they fail to deter, detect or report cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner, we may suffer financial and other harm, including to our information, operations, performance, employees and reputation.

Current wording

Our students and corporate business entities to whom we entrust confidential data, and on whom we rely to provide services, face similar threats and growing requirements, including ones for which others may seek to hold us responsible. We depend on our students, suppliers, and other business entities to implement and verify adequate controls and safeguards to protect against and report cybersecurity incidents. If they fail to deter, detect or report cybersecurity incidents in a timely manner, we may suffer financial and other harm, including to our information, operations, performance, employees and reputation.

Previous wording

Our stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, some of which are not in our control. These factors include:

Current wording

Our stock price may fluctuate significantly as a result of a number of factors, some of which are not in our control. These factors may include: