NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP /DE/

Previous wording

The following discussion should be read along with the financial statements included in this Form 10-K, as well as Part II, “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (MD&A) of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023 (“2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). To the extent the July 1, 2024 SDS realignment impacted the disclosures in the 2023 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we recast those prior year MD&A disclosures herein.

Current wording

The following discussion should be read along with the financial statements included in this Form 10-K, as well as Part II, “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” (MD&A) of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024 (“2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). To the extent the January 1, 2025 SSAS realignment impacted the disclosures in the 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we recast those prior year disclosures herein.

Previous wording

The conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East and threats elsewhere, particularly in the Pacific region, have increased global tensions and instability and highlighted security requirements globally, including in Europe, the Middle East and the Pacific region, as well as the U.S. These conflicts have resulted in and may continue to result in increased demand for defense products and services from allies and partner nations, particularly in those areas. For example, we have experienced an increase in demand for certain of our products and services directly and indirectly related to the conflict in Ukraine. We continue to monitor developments in these regions, but have not experienced, and do not anticipate experiencing, significant adverse financial impacts directly from the conflicts in Ukraine or the Middle East.

Current wording

The ongoing conflict in Ukraine, recent events in Venezuela and threats elsewhere, particularly in the Middle East and the Western Pacific region, have increased global tensions and instability and highlighted security requirements globally, including in Europe, the Middle East, the Pacific region and Latin America, as well as the U.S. These conflicts have resulted in and may continue to result in increased demand for defense products and services from allies and partner nations, particularly in those regions. For example, we experienced an increase in demand for certain of our products and services directly and indirectly related to the conflict in Ukraine. We continue to monitor developments in these regions, but have not experienced, and do not anticipate experiencing, significant adverse financial impacts directly from these conflicts.

Previous wording

We believe the current global security environment highlights the significant national security threats to the U.S. and its allies, and the need for strong deterrence and robust defense capabilities, and are actively evaluating both opportunities and risks associated with this environment. We believe our capabilities, particularly in space, C4ISR, missile defense, battle management, advanced weapons, strategic deterrence, and survivable aircraft and mission systems should help our customers in the U.S. and globally defend against current and future threats and, as a result, continue to allow for long-term profitable business growth.

Current wording

We believe the current global security environment, characterized by significant national security threats to the U.S. and its allies, continues to highlight the need for strong deterrence and robust defense capabilities, and we are actively evaluating both opportunities and risks associated with this environment. We believe our capabilities, particularly in space, C4ISR, air and missile defense, battle management, advanced weapons, strategic deterrence, survivable aircraft and mission systems should help our customers in the U.S. and globally defend against current and future threats and, as a result, continue to position us for long-term profitable business growth.

Previous wording

Over the past several years, the global economic environment has experienced extraordinary challenges, including inflationary pressures; widespread delays and disruptions in supply chains; business slowdowns or shutdowns; workforce challenges and labor shortfalls; and market volatility. These macroeconomic factors have contributed, and in the future could contribute, to increased costs, delays, disruptions and other performance challenges, as well as increased competing demands for limited resources to address such increased costs and other challenges, for our company, our suppliers and partners, and our customers. We continue to work to address challenges caused by the macroeconomic environment on our business. We have seen positive progress in the supply chain as on-time deliveries and quality have improved. In remaining areas of pressure, we are proactively working with our suppliers to ensure we meet our contract commitments. Although certain pockets of our business were adversely affected by the broader macroeconomic environment during the fourth quarter of 2024, the overall financial impact on our company has continued to subside.

Current wording

Over the past several years, the global economic environment has experienced challenges, including inflationary pressures; widespread delays and disruptions in supply chains; business slowdowns or shutdowns; workforce challenges and labor shortfalls; and market volatility. These macroeconomic factors can and have contributed, and could continue to contribute, to increased costs, delays, disruptions and other performance challenges, as well as increased competing demands for limited resources to address such increased costs and other challenges, for our company, our suppliers and partners, and our customers. We continue to work to address challenges to our business caused by the macroeconomic environment. We have seen progress in the supply chain as on-time deliveries and quality continue to improve. In remaining areas of pressure, we are proactively working with our suppliers to help meet our contract commitments.

Previous wording

In addition, an overall increase in interest rates in recent years has raised the cost of borrowing for governments, and if rates further increase, it could impact government spending priorities (in the U.S. and allied countries, in particular), including their demand for defense products. Economic tensions and changes in international trade policies, including higher tariffs on imported goods and materials, the imposition of retaliatory tariffs or other trade protection measures and renegotiation of free trade agreements, could also further impact the global market for defense products, services and solutions.

Current wording

In addition, although interest rates have declined over the past year, they remain elevated compared to recent years and have raised the cost of borrowing for governments. If rates increase or remain elevated, it could impact government spending priorities (in the U.S. and allied countries, in particular), including the demand for defense products. Economic tensions and changes in international trade policies, including, for example, the widespread tariffs announced since last year by the U.S. on its major trading partners, higher tariffs on imported goods and materials and actions taken in response (such as retaliatory tariffs or other trade protectionist measures or the renegotiation of free trade agreements), could also further impact the global market for defense products, services and solutions. The full impact of these governmental actions on macroeconomic conditions and on our business is uncertain, difficult to predict and depends on a number of factors, including the extent and duration of tariffs, any

Previous wording

The U.S. continues to face an uncertain and evolving political, budget and regulatory environment. In particular, it is difficult to predict the specific course of future defense budgets. Current and future requirements related to the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, threats in the Pacific region and other security priorities, as well as the macroeconomic environment, the national debt, and other domestic priorities, among other things, in the U.S. and globally, will continue to impact our customers’ budgets, spending and priorities, and our industry. The U.S. political environment may also impact defense budgets and priorities, issues related to the national debt, and

Current wording

The U.S. continues to face an uncertain and evolving political, budget and regulatory environment. In particular, it is difficult to predict the specific course of future defense budgets. Current and future requirements related to the conflict in Ukraine and threats in the Middle East, the Western Pacific and Latin America and other security priorities, as well as the macroeconomic environment, the national debt, and other domestic priorities, among other things, in the U.S. and globally, will continue to impact our customers’ budgets, spending and priorities, and our industry. The U.S. political environment may also impact defense budgets and priorities, issues related to the national debt, and government spending more broadly. We anticipate that issues related to budgetary priorities, defense spending levels and the debt ceiling will continue to be subjects of considerable debate, with a potentially significant impact on our programs and the company.

Previous wording

Annual appropriations to fund the federal government for FY 2025 have not yet been enacted. Congress continues to pass short-term continuing resolutions (CR) to fund the federal government. The most recent CR passed in December 2024 extends current funding levels until March 14, 2025. It remains uncertain when the government will approve FY 2025 appropriations, and the levels of funding FY 2025 appropriations will provide. Government operations under an extended CR could have potential impacts on our programs and new starts, in particular.

Current wording

Annual appropriations to fund the federal government for FY 2026 have not yet been enacted. On October 1, 2025, the U.S. Government entered a shutdown, which ended on November 12, 2025. The federal government is currently operating under a continuing resolution (“CR”) that extends funding for most agencies (including DoW) until January 30, 2026. It remains uncertain when the government will approve FY 2026 appropriations and what levels of funding the appropriations will provide. Government operations under an extended CR or a government shutdown could have adverse impacts on our programs and new starts, in particular, and the U.S. Government’s ability to make timely payments.

Previous wording

In 2015, the U.S. Air Force awarded Northrop Grumman the B-21 contract, which includes a base contract for engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) and five low-rate initial production (LRIP) options for a baseline total of 21 aircraft. The EMD phase of the program is largely cost type and began at contract award. The LRIP options are largely fixed price and are expected to continue to be awarded and executed through approximately the end of the decade. In addition to the five LRIP options, Northrop Grumman and the U.S. Air Force have established not to exceed (NTE) pricing for additional aircraft up to unit 40. The average NTE value for these subsequent lots is above the average unit price of the five LRIP lots, and the NTE lots include an economic price adjustment clause to help protect against certain inflationary pressures. Final terms, quantity, and pricing for these subsequent lots are not fully negotiated.

Current wording

In 2015, the U.S. Air Force awarded Northrop Grumman the B-21 contract, which includes a base contract for engineering and manufacturing development (EMD) and five low-rate initial production (LRIP) options for a baseline total of 21 aircraft. The EMD phase of the program is largely cost type and began at contract award. The LRIP options are largely fixed price and are expected to continue to be awarded and executed through approximately the end of the decade. In addition to the five LRIP options, Northrop Grumman and the U.S. Air Force have established not to exceed (NTE) pricing for additional aircraft up to unit 40. The average NTE value for these subsequent lots is above the average unit price of the five LRIP lots, and the NTE lots include an economic price adjustment clause to help protect against certain inflationary pressures. Final terms, quantity, and pricing for these subsequent lots are not fully negotiated. We are in discussions with the U.S. Air Force regarding the potential for an accelerated production rate on the program. While the ultimate outcome of these discussions remains uncertain, we currently expect any agreement to accelerate production rate would require future investment by the

Previous wording

During the fourth quarter of 2023, we recognized a projected loss of $1.56 billion across the five LRIP options. During the fourth quarter of 2024, we again reviewed our estimated profitability on the program and made no significant changes to the previously recognized loss. The company’s 2024 results reflect our current best estimate of our cost to complete the LRIP and NTE aircraft, as well as the outcome of ongoing discussions with our suppliers and our customer. If our estimated cost to complete the aircraft changes or our assumptions regarding contract performance, quantities, supplier negotiations, or funding to mitigate the impact of macroeconomic disruptions are resolved more or less favorably than what we have estimated, our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows could be materially affected.

Current wording

The company’s 2025 results reflect our current best estimate of cost to complete the LRIP and NTE aircraft, as well as the outcome of ongoing discussions with our suppliers. If our estimated cost to complete the aircraft changes, if we reach an agreement with the customer regarding an accelerated production rate, or if our assumptions regarding contract performance, quantities, supplier negotiations, or funding to mitigate the impact of macroeconomic disruptions are resolved more or less favorably than what we have estimated, our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows could be materially affected.

Previous wording

In July 2024, the Sentinel program was certified for continuation by the DoD upon completion of the Nunn-McCurdy breach review. In connection with the certification, the DoD directed that the program be restructured, including plans for infrastructure related to the command and launch segment, which was the main driver of the increased cost estimates for the Production and Deployment phases. We are partnering with our customer to establish a new program baseline as part of the restructuring activities.

Current wording

In July 2024, the Sentinel program was certified for continuation by the DoW upon completion of the Nunn-McCurdy breach review. In connection with the certification, the DoW directed that the program be restructured, including plans for infrastructure related to the command and launch segment, which was the main driver of the increased cost estimates for the Production and Deployment phases.

Previous wording

During the fourth quarter of 2024, we reviewed our estimated profitability on the Sentinel program and made no significant changes. The Sentinel EAC incorporates our best estimate of costs to complete the restructured EMD effort; however, if the outcome is more or less favorable than what we have estimated, our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows could be materially affected.

Current wording

During the fourth quarter of 2025, we reviewed our estimated profitability on the Sentinel program and made no significant changes. If our estimated cost to complete the restructured EMD effort or our expectations for achieving contract incentives are more or less favorable than what we have estimated, our financial position, results of operations and/or cash flows could be materially affected.

Previous wording

We manage and assess our business based on our performance on contracts and programs (typically larger contracts or two or more closely-related contracts). We recognize sales from our portfolio of long-term contracts as control is transferred to the customer, primarily over time on a cost-to-cost basis (cost incurred relative to costs estimated at completion). As a result, sales tend to fluctuate in concert with costs incurred across our large portfolio of contracts.

Current wording

We manage and assess our business based on our performance on contracts and programs (typically larger contracts or two or more closely-related contracts). We recognize sales from our portfolio of long-term contracts as control is transferred to the customer, primarily over time on a cost-to-cost basis (cost incurred relative to costs estimated at completion). As a result, sales tend to fluctuate in concert with costs incurred across our large portfolio of contracts. Due to the applicable FAR and CAS requirements that govern our U.S. government business, most types of costs are allocable to U.S. government contracts. As such, we do not focus on individual cost groupings (such as manufacturing, engineering and design labor, subcontractor, material, overhead and general and administrative (G&A) costs), as much as we do on total contract cost, which is the key driver of our sales and operating income.

Previous wording

In evaluating our operating performance, we primarily focus on changes in sales and operating margin rates. Where applicable, significant fluctuations in operating performance attributable to individual contracts or programs, or changes in a specific cost element across multiple contracts, are described in our analysis. Based on this approach and the nature of our operations, the discussion of results of operations below first focuses on our four segments before distinguishing between products and services. Changes in sales are generally described in terms of volume, while changes in operating margin rates are generally described in terms of performance and/or contract mix. For purposes of this discussion, volume generally refers to increases or decreases in sales or cost from production/service activity levels and performance generally refers to non-volume-related changes in profitability, which are typically described in terms of changes in net EAC adjustments. Contract mix generally refers to changes in the ratio of contract type and/or life cycle (e.g., cost-type, fixed-price, development, production, and/or sustainment).

Current wording

In evaluating our operating performance, we primarily focus on changes in sales and operating margin rates. Where applicable, significant fluctuations in operating performance attributable to individual contracts or programs, or changes in a specific cost element across multiple contracts, are described in our analysis. Based on this approach and the nature of our operations, the discussion of results of operations below first focuses on our four segments before distinguishing between products and services. Changes in sales are generally described in terms of volume, while changes in operating margin rates are generally described in terms of performance and/or contract mix. For purposes of this discussion, volume generally refers to increases or decreases in sales or cost from production/service activity levels and performance generally refers to non-volume-related changes in profitability, which are typically described in terms of changes in net EAC adjustments. Contract mix generally refers to changes in the ratio

Previous wording

For purposes of the operating results discussion below, we assess our performance using certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” or “FAS”).

Current wording

For purposes of the operating results discussion below, we assess our performance using certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP” or “FAS”), as follows:

Previous wording

2024 G&A costs as a percentage of sales decreased to 9.7 percent from 10.2 percent primarily due to higher sales.

Current wording

2025 G&A costs as a percentage of sales of 9.6 percent were comparable to the prior year.

Previous wording

For further information regarding product and service operating costs and expenses, see “Product and Service Analysis” below.

Current wording

See “Segment Operating Results” below for further information by segment. For further information regarding product and service operating costs and expenses, see “Product and Service Analysis” below.

Previous wording

The 2024 MTM benefit of $443 million was primarily driven by a 58 basis point increase in the discount rate from year end 2023, partially offset by actual net plan asset returns of 4.7 percent compared to our 7.5 percent asset return assumption.

Current wording

The 2025 MTM benefit of $527 million was primarily driven by actual net plan asset returns of 11.3 percent compared to our 7.5 percent asset return assumption, partially offset by a 15 basis point decrease in the discount rate from year end 2024.

Previous wording

The 2024 effective tax rate (ETR) increased to 16.8 percent from 12.4 percent in 2023 primarily due to the impact of the prior year B-21 charge and the MTM adjustment on our ETR. The 2024 MTM benefit increased the 2024 ETR by 0.4 percentage points, whereas the prior year B-21 charge and MTM expense collectively reduced the 2023 ETR by 3.8 percentage points. The 2024 ETR also reflects a net reduction in tax reserves largely due to a recent federal court decision, partially offset by higher interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Current wording

2025 income tax expense increased $44 million, or 5 percent, due to a higher effective tax rate (ETR) and higher earnings before income taxes. The 2025 ETR increased to 17.5 percent from 16.8 percent in 2024 primarily due to a net reduction in tax reserves in the prior year, lower research credits principally due to enactment of the OBBBA, and additional income tax expense related to nondeductible goodwill in the divested training services business. These increases were partially offset by lower interest expense on unrecognized tax benefits. The MTM benefit in both 2025 and 2024 increased each respective year’s ETR by 0.4 percentage points. See Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Previous wording

2024 net earnings increased $2.1 billion, or 103 percent, primarily due to $1.8 billion of higher operating income, an $865 million increase in our MTM benefit (expense), and a $126 million increase in the non-operating FAS pension benefit. These increases were partially offset by a $552 million increase in income tax expense, a $97 million gain

Current wording

2025 net earnings were comparable to the prior year and reflect the $141 million increase in operating income described above and an $84 million increase in our MTM benefit, partially offset by a $115 million decrease in the non-operating FAS pension benefit, $44 million of higher interest expense and a $44 million increase in income tax expense.

Previous wording

2024 diluted earnings per share increased $14.81, or 109 percent, reflecting the 103 percent increase in net earnings described above and a 3 percent reduction in weighted-average diluted shares outstanding.

Current wording

2025 diluted earnings per share increased $0.74, or 3 percent, reflecting comparable net earnings and a 2 percent reduction in weighted-average diluted shares outstanding.

Previous wording

Subsequent Realignment - Effective January 1, 2025, the company realigned the Strike and Surveillance Aircraft Solutions (SSAS) business unit from Defense Systems to Aeronautics Systems. This realignment is not reflected in the financial information contained in this report; it will be reflected in the company’s operating results beginning in the first quarter of 2025.

Current wording

Effective January 1, 2025, the company realigned the Strike and Surveillance Aircraft Solutions (SSAS) business unit from Defense Systems to Aeronautics Systems. This realignment is reflected in the financial information contained in this report.

Previous wording

(1)Represents the deferred state tax expense (benefit) associated with MTM benefit (expense) and the prior year B-21 charge, which are recorded in Unallocated corporate expense consistent with other changes in deferred state taxes.

Current wording

(1)Represents the deferred state tax expense (benefit) associated with MTM benefit (expense) and the B-21 loss provisions, which are recorded in Unallocated corporate expense consistent with other changes in deferred state taxes.

Previous wording

2024 segment operating income increased $1.8 billion, or 65 percent, primarily due to higher operating income at Aeronautics Systems, largely driven by the prior year $1.56 billion charge on the B-21 program, as well as higher operating income at Space Systems and Defense Systems. Segment operating margin rate increased to 11.1 percent reflecting higher operating margin rates at Aeronautics Systems and Space Systems, partially offset by a lower operating margin rate at Mission Systems.

Current wording

2025 segment operating income decreased $167 million, or 4 percent, primarily due to $423 million of lower operating income at Aeronautics Systems reflecting the first quarter B-21 loss provision and $71 million of lower operating income at Space Systems, partially offset by higher operating income of $229 million at Mission Systems and $155 million at Defense Systems. Segment operating margin rate decreased to 10.4 percent primarily due to the B-21 loss provision at Aeronautics Systems, partially offset by higher operating margin rates at Defense Systems, Mission Systems and Space Systems.

Previous wording

Net Estimate-At-Completion (EAC) Adjustments -We record changes in estimated contract earnings at completion (net EAC adjustments) using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. Net EAC adjustments can have a significant effect on reported sales and operating income and the aggregate amounts are presented in the table below:

Current wording

Net EAC Adjustments -We record changes in estimated contract earnings at completion (net EAC adjustments) using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting. Net EAC adjustments can have a significant effect on reported sales, operating income and margin rate.

Previous wording

Aeronautics Systems is a leader in the design, development, production, integration, sustainment and modernization of military aircraft systems for the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, other U.S. government agencies, and international customers. Major products include strategic long-range strike aircraft; tactical fighter and air dominance aircraft; airborne battle management and command and control systems; and unmanned autonomous aircraft systems, including high-altitude long-endurance (HALE) strategic intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems.

Current wording

Aeronautics Systems is a leader in the design, development, production, integration, sustainment and modernization of military aircraft systems for the U.S. Air Force, the U.S. Navy, other U.S. government agencies, and international customers. Major products include strategic long-range strike aircraft; tactical fighter and air dominance aircraft; airborne battle management and command and control systems; and uncrewed autonomous aircraft systems, including high-altitude long-endurance (HALE) strategic intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) systems.

Previous wording

Defense Systems is a leader in the design, engineering, development, integration and production of strategic deterrent systems, advanced tactical weapons, and missile defense solutions, and a provider of sustainment, modernization and training services for manned and unmanned aircraft and electronics systems for the U.S. military and a broad range of international customers. Major products and services include strategic missiles; integrated, all-domain command and control (C2) systems; precision strike weapons; advanced propulsion, including tactical solid rocket motors and high speed air-breathing and hypersonic systems; high-performance gun systems, ammunition, precision munitions and advanced fuzes; and aircraft and mission systems logistics support, sustainment, operations and modernization.

Current wording

Defense Systems is a leader in the design, engineering, development, integration and production of strategic deterrent systems, advanced tactical weapons, and missile defense solutions for the U.S. military and a broad range of international customers. Major products and services include strategic missiles; integrated, all-domain command and control (C2) systems; precision strike weapons; advanced propulsion, including tactical solid rocket motors and high speed air-breathing and hypersonic systems; high-performance gun systems, ammunition, precision munitions and advanced fuzes; and weapons integration, modernization, and sustainment.

Previous wording

2024 sales increased $271 million, or 3 percent, primarily due to a $182 million increase on Sentinel as that program continues to ramp, a $163 million increase on certain military ammunition programs, a $124 million increase on Stand-in Attack Weapon (SiAW) as the program ramps and higher volume from timing of materials and increased order quantities on the Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS) program. These increases were partially offset by a $262 million decrease due to the completion of an international training program and lower volume on the Special Electronic Mission Aircraft (SEMA) program as it nears completion.

Current wording

2025 sales increased $603 million, or 8 percent, primarily due to a $224 million increase on Sentinel as that program continues to ramp, a $185 million increase on armament programs, including military ammunition programs, a $153 million increase in sales from new awards across the IBCS program portfolio, and higher volume due to material timing on the GMLRS program. These increases were partially offset by a $192 million reduction in sales related to the divested training services business.

Previous wording

Mission Systems is a leader in advanced mission solutions and multifunction systems, primarily for the U.S. defense and intelligence community, and international customers. Major products and services include command, control, communications and computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems; radar, electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) and acoustic sensors; electronic warfare systems; advanced communications and network systems; advanced microelectronics; navigation and positioning sensors; maritime power, propulsion and payload launch systems; full spectrum cyber solutions; and intelligence processing systems.

Current wording

Mission Systems is a leader in advanced mission solutions and multifunction systems, primarily for the U.S. defense and intelligence community, and international customers. Major products and services include radar, electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) and acoustic sensors; command, control, communications and computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems; electronic warfare systems; advanced communications and network systems; advanced microelectronics; navigation and positioning sensors; maritime power, propulsion and payload launch systems; full spectrum cyber solutions; and intelligence processing systems.

Previous wording

2024 sales decreased $142 million, or 1 percent, primarily due to wind-down of work on the restricted space and NGI programs, which reduced sales by $595 million. This reduction was partially offset by a $302 million increase on Space Development Agency (SDA) satellite programs and a $130 million increase on the Habitation and Logistics Outpost (HALO) program.

Current wording

2025 sales decreased $960 million, or 8 percent, primarily due to wind-down of work on the restricted space and NGI programs, which reduced sales by $738 million, as well as a $172 million decrease for the SDA satellite programs due to the timing of materials and a $102 million decrease driven by lower volume on the SLS Booster program. These decreases were partially offset by a $168 million increase on GEM 63 and higher volume on HALO as those programs continue to ramp.

Previous wording

2023 operating income increased $48 million, or 6 percent, due to higher sales, partially offset by a lower operating margin rate. Operating margin rate decreased to 10.0 percent from 10.2 percent, primarily due to lower net EAC adjustments.

Current wording

2025 operating income decreased $71 million, or 6 percent, due to lower sales, partially offset by a higher operating margin rate. Operating margin rate increased to 11.0 percent from 10.7 percent principally due to more favorable contract mix.

Previous wording

2024 product costs were comparable to the prior year, reflecting a higher operating margin rate principally due to the prior year $1.56 billion charge on the B-21 program at Aeronautics Systems and higher EAC adjustments at Space Systems, largely driven by the HALO program.

Current wording

2025 product costs increased $1.2 billion, or 4 percent, reflecting a lower operating margin rate principally due to the $477 million loss provision recorded on the B-21 program at Aeronautics Systems in the first quarter of 2025, partially offset by higher net EAC adjustments at Defense Systems largely driven by Sentinel.

Previous wording

2023 service sales increased $313 million, or 4 percent, due to an increase in service sales at Space Systems, Mission Systems, and Aeronautics Systems. The increase was principally driven by higher restricted sales at Space Systems and Aeronautics Systems, and higher volume on restricted programs and F-35 sustainment at Mission Systems.

Current wording

2025 service sales decreased $94 million, or 1 percent, primarily due to lower restricted sales at Space Systems and lower service volume at Defense Systems due to the training services divestiture, partially offset by higher restricted sales at Mission Systems and higher volume on aircraft sustainment services at Aeronautics Systems.

Previous wording

2024 service costs were comparable to the prior year, consistent with the change in services sales described above.

Current wording

2025 service costs decreased $106 million, or 1 percent, consistent with the change in services sales described above.

Previous wording

Backlog represents the future sales we expect to recognize on firm orders received by the company and is equivalent to the company’s remaining performance obligations at the end of each period. It comprises both funded backlog (firm orders for which funding is authorized and appropriated) and unfunded backlog. Unexercised contract options and indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts are not included in backlog until the time the option or IDIQ task order is exercised or awarded. Backlog is converted into sales as costs are incurred or deliveries are made.

Current wording

(firm orders for which funding is authorized and appropriated) and unfunded backlog. Unexercised contract options and indefinite delivery indefinite quantity (IDIQ) contracts are not included in backlog until the time the option or IDIQ task order is exercised or awarded. Backlog is converted into sales as costs are incurred or deliveries are made.

Previous wording

2024 net awards totaled $50.6 billion. Significant 2024 new awards include $11.8 billion for restricted programs (primarily at Aeronautics Systems, Mission Systems, and Space Systems), $3.5 billion for the Take Charge and Move Out (TACAMO) mission, $3.5 billion for F-35 (primarily at Aeronautics Systems), $2.4 billion for E-2, $1.8 billion for Next-Gen OPIR Polar, $0.9 billion for Poland IBCS, and $0.8 billion for certain military ammunition programs.

Current wording

2025 net awards totaled $46.3 billion. Significant 2025 new awards include $14.8 billion for restricted programs (primarily at Aeronautics Systems, Space Systems, and Mission Systems), $3.3 billion for F-35 (at Mission Systems and Aeronautics Systems), $2.5 billion for GEM 63, $1.8 billion for GWS, and $1.3 billion for Virginia Class submarines.

Previous wording

We are focused on the efficient conversion of operating income into cash to provide for the company’s material cash requirements, including working capital needs, satisfaction of contractual commitments, funding of our pension and OPB plans, investment in our business through capital expenditures, and shareholder return through dividend payments and share repurchases.

Current wording

We are focused on the efficient conversion of operating income into cash to provide for the company’s material cash requirements, including working capital needs, satisfaction of contractual commitments, investment in our business through capital expenditures, funding of our pension and OPB plans, and shareholder returns.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 billion; $268 million was held outside of the U.S. by foreign subsidiaries. We expect cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operating activities, supplemented by borrowings under credit facilities, commercial paper and/or in the capital markets through our shelf registration with the SEC, if needed, to be sufficient to provide liquidity to the company in the short-term and long-term. The company has a five-year senior unsecured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $2.5 billion, and in April 2024, we renewed our one-year $500 million uncommitted credit facility. At December 31, 2024, there were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. In January 2024, we issued $2.5 billion of unsecured senior notes for general corporate purposes, including debt repayment, share repurchases and working capital.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4.4 billion; $265 million was held outside of the U.S. by foreign subsidiaries. We expect cash and cash equivalents and cash generated from operating activities, supplemented by borrowings under credit facilities, commercial paper and/or in the capital markets through our shelf registration with the SEC, if needed, to be sufficient to provide liquidity to the company in the short-term and long-term. The company has a five-year senior unsecured credit facility in an aggregate principal amount of $3.0 billion, and in April 2025, we renewed our one-year $500 million uncommitted credit facility. At December 31, 2025, there were no borrowings outstanding under these credit facilities. In May 2025, we issued $1.0 billion of unsecured senior notes for general corporate purposes, including debt repayment, share repurchases and working capital.

Previous wording

-38- order commitments to suppliers and subcontractors under U.S. government contracts. In most circumstances, our risk associated with the purchase obligations on our U.S. government contracts is limited to the termination liability provisions within those contracts. As such, we do not believe they represent a material liquidity risk to the company. At December 31, 2024, we had capital expenditure commitments of $1.5 billion, which we expect to satisfy with cash on hand. We also had provisions for uncertain tax positions of $1.4 billion, some or all of which could result in future cash payments to various taxing authorities. At this time, we are unable to estimate the timing and amount of any future cash outflows related to these uncertain tax positions.

Current wording

The company’s principal contractual commitments include purchase obligations, repayments of long-term debt and related interest, and payments under operating leases. At December 31, 2025, we had $23.9 billion of purchase obligations, approximately half of which are short-term. Purchase obligations are largely comprised of open purchase order commitments to suppliers and subcontractors under U.S. government contracts. In most circumstances, our risk associated with the purchase obligations on our U.S. government contracts is limited by the termination liability provisions within those contracts. As such, we do not believe they represent a material liquidity risk to the company. At December 31, 2025, we had capital expenditure commitments of $1.6 billion, which we expect to satisfy with cash on hand. We also had provisions for uncertain tax positions of $1.6 billion, some or all of which could result in future cash payments to various taxing authorities. At this time, we are unable to estimate the timing and amount of any future cash outflows related to these uncertain tax positions.

Previous wording

In addition to our cash position, we consider various cash flow measures in capital deployment decision-making, including cash provided by operating activities and adjusted free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure described in more detail below.

Current wording

In addition to our cash position, we consider various cash flow measures in capital deployment decision-making, including cash provided by operating activities and free cash flow, a non-GAAP measure described in more detail below.

Previous wording

2024 cash provided by operating activities increased $513 million, or 13 percent, principally due to improved trade working capital, largely driven by lower net tax payments, as well as higher net earnings.

Current wording

2024 cash provided by operating activities increased $513 million, or 13 percent, driven by $355 million lower net cash tax payments.