CENTERPOINT ENERGY INC
For the period ended Mar 31, 2025. Filed Apr 24, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2025 · Filed Apr 24, 2025
CNP$40.66+1.7%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-10-28.
0001130310-24-000115
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRecent EventsCertain Factors Affecting Future EarningsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-04-24.
0001130310-25-000079
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRecent EventsCertain Factors Affecting Future EarningsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 197 previous paragraphs and 151 current paragraphs.
79 unchanged; 53 reworded; 18 added; 63 removed; 2 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 21 previous and 18 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (18)
Current report
Equity Distribution Agreement. In April 2025, CenterPoint Energy entered into forward sale agreements with counterparties relating to 3,277,764 shares and 680,902 shares of Common Stock at an initial forward price of $36.29 and $36.72, respectively. For additional information, see Note 15 and Note 16 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Current report
Acquisition of Posey Solar. On March 7, 2025, SIGECO acquired 100% of the equity interests in Posey Solar, which was constructing a 191 MW solar array in Posey County, Indiana, for approximately $357 million. For information about this transaction, see Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Current report
•a decrease in net income of $55 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
Current report
•an increase in net income of $15 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to the favorable impact of accrued income tax benefits offset in other segments. This increase was partially offset by $14 million associated with increased borrowing costs.
Current report
For information about Houston Electric’s TEEEF, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Current report
The Registrants will monitor the 89th Texas Legislature for legislation that may impact their businesses.
Current report
Following feedback from customers, external experts and other stakeholders, including elected officials and local agencies, Houston Electric filed a revised SRP with the PUCT on January 31, 2025 for review and approval. The SRP proposes to invest approximately $5.75 billion over a three-year period from 2026 to 2028 for transmission and distribution infrastructure, information technology and cybersecurity assets and event response capability. This plan proposes 39 resiliency-enhancing measures and a microgrid pilot program to be implemented over the three-year period. The SRP has an estimated capital cost of approximately $5.54 billion and an estimated operations and maintenance expense of approximately $211 million. Approximately $2.17 billion of such cost is for transmission-related investments, and approximately $3.58 billion is for distribution-related investments. Intervenor testimony was filed on April 8, 2025, and PUCT staff testimony was filed on April 15, 2025. All parties have agreed to mediation led by the State Office of Administrative Hearings on April 29, 2025. Houston Electric’s rebuttal is due by May 1, 2025. A hearing on the merits is scheduled for May 12, 2025 through May 14, 2025 and a decision from the PUCT is anticipated in the third quarter of 2025.
Current report
Ohio Gas Rate Case. CEOH filed its Application and Standard Filing Requirement in October 2024 and the related testimony in November 2024. The filing seeks a revenue requirement increase of approximately $100 million based on a requested return on equity of 10.4% and an equity percentage of 45.87%. The need for a rate increase was primarily driven by continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system. A final order is expected no sooner than the first quarter of 2026.
Current report
In 2025, the U.S. government has announced and, in certain cases, rescinded, multiple tariffs on several foreign jurisdictions and imports into the United States. For example, in March 2025, the U.S. government imposed a 25% tariff on steel imports, and in April 2025, the U.S. government announced a baseline tariff of 10% on products imported from all countries and an additional individualized reciprocal tariff on the countries with which the United States has the largest trade deficits, including China. Increased tariffs by the United States have led, and may continue to lead, to the imposition of retaliatory tariffs or other measures taken by foreign jurisdictions, which may in turn lead to additional tariffs imposed or measures taken by the United States. Additionally, the announcement and rescission of tariffs on foreign jurisdictions has increased uncertainty regarding the ultimate effect of the tariffs on economic conditions. Current uncertainties about tariffs and their effects on trading relationships may affect the Registrants’ ability to access the capital markets, contribute to inflation in the markets in which the Registrants operate, increase commodity cost volatility, impact availability of goods and materials, or otherwise negatively impact the global supply chain. The Registrants are continuing to monitor the economic effects of such announcements and developments, as well as the Registrants’ ability to mitigate their related impacts, but costs and other effects associated with the tariffs remain uncertain.
Current report
There has been increasing attention at the local, state and international levels to the issue of climate risk. There has been a recent shift, however, in climate policy at the federal level in the United States. On January 20, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement, which will take effect on January 27, 2026. Additionally, in January 2025, President Trump signed a series of executive orders that, among other things, (i) call upon the EPA to submit a report on the continuing applicability of its endangerment finding for GHGs under the Clean Air Act and issue guidance on the “social cost of carbon” to consider whether such metric should be eliminated, (ii) direct federal executive departments and agencies to initiate a regulatory freeze for certain rules that have not taken effect, pending review by the newly appointed agency head, (iii) temporarily halt certain federal government agencies from issuing approvals, permits and loans for wind projects pending the completion of certain assessments and reviews and (iv) pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the IRA and the Infrastructure Investments and Jobs Act. In response to the series of executive orders, on March 12, 2025, the EPA announced 31 regulatory actions, including the reconsideration of certain regulations and standards under the Clean Air Act and other air-related rules such as the 2009 endangerment finding authorizing the EPA to regulate GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act, the mandatory GHG Reporting Program, GHG emissions limits for the oil and gas sector adopted by the prior administration, and the rules regulating GHG emissions from new gas-fired combustion turbines and existing coal, oil and gas-fired steam generating units. On March 14, 2025, President Trump signed a Joint Resolution of Disapproval under the Congressional Review Act to prohibit the IRA’s waste methane emissions charge rules, which were finalized in November 2024, from taking effect.
Current report
Recent changes in the U.S. presidential administration and significant expected increases in electric demand, as announced by organizations such as ERCOT and MISO, have shifted the energy landscape in the United States. Since taking office, President Trump has issued a series of executive orders and presidential memoranda that seek to increase investment in fossil fuel infrastructure, including by directing all heads of federal agencies to identify and begin the processes to suspend, revise or rescind all agency actions that are determined to be unduly burdensome on the identification, development or use of domestic energy resources, with particular attention to oil, natural gas, hydropower, biofuels, critical mineral and nuclear energy resources. This shift in federal domestic energy policy has resulted in uncertainty with respect to the scope and speed of future renewable generation infrastructure development and the role that existing renewable generation will play in support of the U.S. energy grid. The long-term impacts of this domestic energy policy shift are uncertain, including with respect to impacts on the regulatory framework relating to the development of, and consequently the availability of, alternative energy sources (such as private solar, microturbines, fuel cells, energy-efficient buildings and energy storage devices). Additionally, it is unclear whether, and if so how, the new domestic energy policy, including the potential suspension, revision or rescission of regulations restricting emissions (including methane emissions), will affect consumers’ and companies’ energy use, adoption of alternative energy sources or decisions to expand their facilities, including natural gas facilities.
Current report
(1)Includes a portion of the proceeds from the sale of CERC Corp.’s Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses.
Current report
On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses for approximately $1.2 billion, subject to adjustment as set forth in the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement, including adjustments based on net working capital, regulatory assets and liabilities and capital expenditures at closing. The transaction closed on March 31, 2025. On March 7, 2025, SIGECO acquired 100% of the equity interests in Posey Solar, which is constructing a 191 MW solar array in Posey County, Indiana, for approximately $357 million. For further information, see Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Current report
•increased costs of certain goods, materials or services due to tariffs or trade restrictions imposed by the U.S. government, the imposition of retaliatory tariffs or other measures, and any effect on trading relationships between the United States and other countries;
Removed paragraphs (63)
Previous report
Various federal, state and local governmental and regulatory agencies and other entities, such as the Texas Governor’s office, the Texas Legislature and the PUCT, have called for or are conducting inquiries and investigations into Hurricane Beryl, the efforts made by Houston Electric to prepare for, and respond to, this event, including the electric service outage issues, and the procurement of temporary generation units. Moreover, additional governmental and regulatory agencies and other entities may conduct such inquiries and investigations, as well. Texas Lieutenant Governor Patrick has publicly urged the PUCT to hold Houston Electric, rather than ratepayers, responsible for paying $800 million, which was the amount the PUCT had previously approved Houston Electric to recover from ratepayers pursuant to Texas legislation passed after the 2021 Winter Storm Event relating to emergency responsiveness and the leasing of temporary generation units. On August 12, 2024, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton opened an investigation to evaluate CenterPoint Energy’s conduct during Hurricane Beryl. There are significant uncertainties around these inquiries and investigations and potential results and consequences, including whether any financial penalties will be assessed or changes to Houston Electric’s system, service territories, operations and/or regulatory treatment will result therefrom.
Previous report
Houston Electric announced an initial hurricane preparedness and response action plan to the PUCT on July 25, 2024 to enhance the resiliency of the electric system through various investments. Following a meeting with Texas Governor Abbott on August 1, 2024, Houston Electric publicly committed to accelerating its previously announced initial hurricane preparedness and response action plan. Additionally, Houston Electric announced that it was withdrawing both its base rate application and its application for approval of its transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT in order to focus on addressing the impacts of Hurricane Beryl in its service territory and accelerating preparedness and resiliency efforts for the remaining storm season. The withdrawal of the system resiliency plan was granted by the PUCT. Subsequently, intervenors filed a motion to challenge the withdrawal of the base rate proceeding. On August 16, 2024, the ALJ issued an order denying the requested withdrawal of the base rate proceeding, leaving the base rate proceeding abated. Houston Electric filed an appeal of the ALJ’s order to the PUCT, and on October 15, 2024, PUCT commissioners voted to consider the merits of Houston Electric’s appeal at the PUCT’s open meeting scheduled for November 14, 2024. The PUCT’s decision on the withdrawal of the base rate proceeding is expected in the fourth quarter of 2024. CenterPoint Energy cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.
Previous report
On August 5, 2024, Houston Electric announced the launch of its GHRI. Subsequently, Houston Electric announced the completion of core resiliency actions as part of the first phase of its GHRI, which included certain vegetation management and pole installation goals. In September 2024, Houston Electric announced the launch of the second phase of its GHRI, which included a series of resiliency plans to install new poles, manage higher-risk vegetation and install certain automated devices prior to the start of the 2025 hurricane season as part of its efforts to strengthen grid resiliency, improve public and customer communications and strengthen local, community and emergency partnerships. Houston Electric also announced a longer-term proposal for approximately $5 billion in resiliency investment from 2026 to 2028. Houston Electric intends to include this longer-term proposal in a new transmission and distribution system resiliency plan that is expected to be filed with the PUCT on or before January 31, 2025 following feedback from customers, external experts, elected officials, local agencies and other stakeholders. Additionally, Houston Electric announced its proposal to forego approximately $110 million of profit related to its storm hardening and TEEEF efforts, which would be represented by (1) Houston Electric not seeking to recover approximately $70 million in incremental storm hardening expenses incurred in connection with accelerated operational activities after
Previous report
Hurricane Beryl; and (2) Houston Electric not filing, beginning in 2028, for approximately $40 million in anticipated equity profit associated with load-shed orientated TEEEF leased by Houston Electric through the remaining regulatory life of the leases in 2032 as new dispatchable generation is likely to come online in the state of Texas as a result of the Texas Energy Fund.
Previous report
For more information regarding regulatory impacts and the term loan facility to fund certain costs related to the May 2024 Storm Events and litigation related to Hurricane Beryl, see Notes 6, 11 and 13 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below.
Previous report
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $3 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
Previous report
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $2 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to $9 million of higher state income taxes, $7 million associated with corporate operating expenses, and $6 million associated with increased borrowing costs . The decrease is partially offset by $26 million of income allocated to holders of Series A Preferred Stock in the third quarter of 2023 prior to the redemption of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in September 2023 as discussed in Note 18 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous report
Nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2023
Previous report
Income available to common shareholders increased $96 million primarily due to the following items:
Previous report
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $31 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
Previous report
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $64 million for the Natural Gas reportable segment, as further discussed below; and
Previous report
•an increase in income available to common shareholders of $63 million for Corporate and Other, primarily due to $50 million of income allocated to holders of Series A Preferred Stock in the nine months ended September 30, 2023 prior to the redemption of all outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock in September 2023 as discussed in Note 18 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements, a loss on sale of $12 million and current tax expense of $33 million related to divestiture of Energy Systems Group recorded in the nine months ended June 30, 2023 further discussed in Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements, as well as $19 million due to remeasurement of deferred income tax balances recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2023. The increase is partially offset by $29 million associated with increased borrowing costs, $9 million of higher state income taxes, and $7 million associated with corporate operating expenses.
Previous report
(1)This change is primarily related to the receipt of proceeds at CenterPoint Energy and CERC from the Texas securitization program in 2023. For further details, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous report
For further information about the February 2021 Winter Storm Event, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous report
Indiana Electric Securitization of Generation Retirements (CenterPoint Energy)
Previous report
For further information about the issuance of SIGECO Securitization Bonds, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous report
On July 5, 2022, Indiana Electric entered into a BTA to acquire a 130 MW solar array in Pike County, Indiana through a special purpose entity for a capped purchase price. A CPCN for the project was filed with the IURC on July 29, 2022. On September 21, 2022, an agreement in principle was reached resolving all the issues between Indiana Electric and OUCC. The Stipulation and Settlement agreement was filed on October 6, 2022 and a settlement hearing was held on November 1, 2022. On January 11, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the settlement agreement authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase and acquire the Pike County solar project through a BTA and approved the estimated cost. The IURC also designated the project as a clean energy project under applicable Indiana regulations, approved the proposed levelized rate and associated ratemaking and accounting treatment. Due to inflationary pressures, the developer disclosed that costs exceeded the agreed upon levels in the BTA. After negotiations, Indiana Electric and the developer were not able to agree upon updated pricing. As a result, on February 27, 2024, Indiana Electric provided notice that it was exercising its right to terminate the BTA, which terminated all further obligations of Indiana Electric with respect to the project.
Previous report
In June 2022, F.B. Culley Unit 3, an Indiana Electric coal-fired electric generation unit with an installed generating capacity of 270 MW, experienced an operating issue relating to its boiler feed pump turbine. The unit returned to service in March 2023. In testimony filed September 13, 2023, the OUCC and an intervenor that represents industrial customers filed testimony with the IURC alleging that Indiana Electric did not act prudently which led to the unplanned outage and recommended disallowances between $21 million to $27 million. On July 3, 2024, the IURC issued an order finding Indiana Electric acted reasonably and prudently with respect to the events that gave rise to the Culley Unit 3 outage and, in addition, did not approve the intervenors proposed disallowance. The order is now final and non-appealable.
Previous report
Space City Solar Transmission Interconnection Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Previous report
On December 17, 2020, Houston Electric filed a CCN with the PUCT for approval to build a 345 kV transmission line in Wharton County, Texas connecting the Hillje substation on Houston Electric’s transmission system to the planned 610 MW Space City Solar Generation facility being developed by third-party developer EDF Renewables. In November 2021, the PUCT approved a route that was estimated to cost $25 million and issued a final order on January 12, 2022. There have been project delays due to supply chain constraints in the developer acquiring solar panels. Houston Electric substantially completed construction in the fall of 2023, and the transmission line is expected to be energized shortly after the generation facility is complete, which is anticipated to occur in the first half of 2025.
Previous report
Kilgore Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Previous report
On August 30, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Chambers County, Texas that will loop the existing 138 kV Chevron to Langston circuit number 86 on Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Kilgore substation. On March 7, the PUCT issued a final order approving a route that was estimated to cost $60 million, including substation costs. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Kilgore substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors. Completion of construction and energization of the line and substation is anticipated to occur in the second quarter of 2026.
Previous report
Mill Creek Transmission Project (CenterPoint Energy and Houston Electric)
Previous report
On November 17, 2023, Houston Electric filed a CCN application with the PUCT for approval to build a 138 kV double circuit transmission line in Harris and Montgomery counties, Texas that will connect Houston Electric’s transmission system to Houston Electric’s planned Mill Creek substation. The actual capital costs of the project, including the transmission line and the planned Mill Creek substation, will depend on actual land acquisition costs, construction costs, and other factors and have been estimated to be $62 million to $98 million, based on an amended CCN application filed by Houston Electric on February 26, 2024 and subsequent errata filed on May 9, 2024. On October 24, 2024, the PUCT heard oral arguments and indicated that they will issue a decision on this project on November 14, 2024.
Previous report
Houston Electric and CERC are also reviewing legislation passed in 2023 and associated PUCT rulemaking projects, including the following pieces of legislation that became law during the 88th Texas Legislature, including:
Previous report
•House Bill 1500 became effective on September 1, 2023 and continues the functions of the PUCT, the Office of Public Utility Counsel, and ERCOT through 2029. This bill also includes an amendment that clarifies the use cases under which TDUs may lease and operate temporary generation during “significant” power outages;
Previous report
•House Bill 2263 became effective on June 12, 2023 and authorizes LDCs to offer programs to promote energy conservation and to recover costs prudently incurred to implement such programs under Railroad Commission authority;
Previous report
•House Bill 2555 became effective on June 13, 2023 and allows an electric utility to file a transmission and distribution system resiliency plan with the PUCT and associated cost recovery to enhance its system through hardening, modernization, undergrounding certain lines, lightning mitigation measures, flood mitigation measures, information technology, cybersecurity, physical security, vegetation management and wildfire mitigation. On January 18, 2024, the PUCT issued an Order adopting its Resiliency Plan Rule (16 Tex. Admin. Code § 25.62);
Previous report
•Senate Bill 947 became effective on September 1, 2023 and creates severe criminal offenses for intentional damage to critical infrastructure facilities that create extended power outages;
Previous report
•Senate Bill 1015 became effective on June 18, 2023 and allows utilities to file the DCRF twice a year, on any day the PUCT is open (at least 185 days after filing a full base rate proceeding) and setting an administrative approval timeline of 60 days;
Previous report
•Senate Bill 1016 became effective on May 5, 2023 and requires the PUCT to presume that all employee compensation and benefits are reasonable and necessary when establishing a utility’s rates if based upon market compensation studies issued within the last three years; it includes exceptions for utility officer incentives that are based on financial metrics. Certain incentive compensation that is in-line with market studies will be presumed reasonable and recoverable; and
Previous report
•Senate Bill 1076 became effective on June 2, 2023 and moves the timeline for the PUCT to approve CCN for transmission projects to 180 days after the date of filing, rather than the first anniversary of the day it was filed.
Previous report
The Natural Gas Innovation Act was passed by the Minnesota legislature in June 2021 with bipartisan support. This law establishes a regulatory framework to enable the state’s investor-owned natural gas utilities to provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions and advancing the state’s clean energy future. The maximum allowable cost for an innovation plan will start at 1.75% of the utility's revenue in the state and could increase to 4% by 2033, subject to review and approval by the MPUC. Specifically, the Natural Gas Innovation Act allows a natural gas utility to submit an innovation plan for approval by the MPUC which could propose the use of renewable energy resources and innovative technologies such as:
Previous report
•renewable natural gas (produces energy from organic materials such as wastewater, agricultural manure, food waste, agricultural or forest waste);
Previous report
•renewable hydrogen gas (produces energy from water through electrolysis with renewable electricity such as solar);
Previous report
•energy efficiency measures (avoids energy consumption in excess of the utility’s existing conservation programs); and
Previous report
•innovative technologies (reduces or avoids GHG emissions using technologies such as carbon capture).
Showing the first 40 of 63 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Reworded paragraphs (53)
Previous wording
On February 19, 2024, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., entered into the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement to sell its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses. The transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2025. For further information, see Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Current wording
Divestiture of Louisiana and Mississippi Natural Gas Businesses. On March 31, 2025, CenterPoint Energy, through its subsidiary CERC Corp., completed the sale of its Louisiana and Mississippi natural gas LDC businesses for approximately $1.2 billion, subject to adjustment as set forth in the LAMS Asset Purchase Agreement, including adjustments based on net working capital, regulatory assets and liabilities and capital expenditures at closing. For information about this transaction, see Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of our consolidated operations, see “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K.
Previous wording
Income available to common shareholders for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023 was as follows:
Current wording
Net income for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024 was as follows:
Previous wording
(1)Includes energy performance contracting and sustainable infrastructure services through Energy Systems Group before June 30, 2023, the date of the sale of Energy Systems Group, unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense, intercompany eliminations and the reduction of income allocated to preferred shareholders before September 1, 2023, the date of the redemption of all of the outstanding shares of the Series A Preferred Stock.
Current wording
(1)Includes unallocated corporate costs, interest income and interest expense and intercompany eliminations.
Previous wording
Income available to common shareholders decreased $63 million primarily due to the following items:
Current wording
Net income decreased $53 million primarily due to the following items:
Previous wording
•a decrease in income available to common shareholders of $64 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
Current wording
•a decrease in net income of $13 million for the Electric reportable segment, as further discussed below;
Previous wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K.
Previous wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2023 as well as for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023 by major income statement caption for CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
Current wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 by major income statement caption for CenterPoint Energy’s Electric reportable segment:
Previous wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Natural Gas,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K.
Current wording
For information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Natural Gas,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K.
Previous wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2023 as well as for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023 by major income statement caption for CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
Current wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 by major income statement caption for CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas reportable segment:
Previous wording
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For more information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of Houston Electric’s business, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
Houston Electric’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its single reportable segment. Houston Electric’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for electricity. Houston Electric’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates Houston Electric charges, debt service costs, income tax expense, Houston Electric’s ability to collect receivables from REPs and Houston Electric’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For more information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations of Houston Electric’s business, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Electric Generation, Transmission and Distribution,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K and in Part II, Item 1A of this combined Form 10-Q.
Previous wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2023 as well as for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023 by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
Current wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 by major income statement caption for Houston Electric:
Previous wording
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For more information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations for CERC’s business, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Natural Gas,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K.
Current wording
CERC’s CODM views net income as the measure of profit or loss for its single reportable segment. CERC’s results of operations are affected by seasonal fluctuations in the demand for natural gas. CERC’s results of operations are also affected by, among other things, the actions of various federal, state and local governmental authorities having jurisdiction over rates CERC charges, debt service costs and income tax expense, CERC’s ability to collect receivables from customers and CERC’s ability to recover its regulatory assets. For more information regarding factors that may affect the future results of operations for CERC’s business, see “Risk Factors — Risk Factors Affecting Operations — Natural Gas,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Regulatory, Environmental and Legal Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Financial, Economic and Market Risks,” “— Risk Factors Affecting Safety and Security Risks” and “— General and Other Risks” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K.
Previous wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2023 as well as for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023 by major income statement caption for CERC:
Current wording
The following table provides variance explanations for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024 by major income statement caption for CERC:
Previous wording
For information on other developments, factors and trends that may impact the Registrants’ future earnings, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings” in Item 7 of Part II and “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K, and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” and “Risk Factors” in this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For information on other developments, factors and trends that may impact the Registrants’ future earnings, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Certain Factors Affecting Future Earnings” in Item 7 of Part II and “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K, and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” in this combined Form 10-Q.
Previous wording
The following table summarizes the net cash provided by (used in) operating, investing and financing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023:
Current wording
The following table summarizes the Registrants’ cash flows by category during the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024:
Previous wording
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023:
Current wording
Operating Activities. The following items contributed to increased (decreased) net cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024:
Previous wording
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023:
Current wording
Investing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024:
Previous wording
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2023:
Current wording
Financing Activities. The following items contributed to (increased) decreased net cash provided by (used in) financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2025 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2024:
Previous wording
The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, storm restoration costs, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures (other than expenditures associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl) are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure. These capital expenditures are anticipated to enhance reliability and safety, increase resiliency and expand our systems through value-added projects. Substantial capital expenditures are also expected for restoration costs associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, as further described below. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Common Stock and interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for the remainder of 2024 include the following:
Current wording
The liquidity and capital requirements of the Registrants are affected primarily by results of operations, capital expenditures, storm restoration costs, debt service requirements, tax payments, working capital needs and various regulatory actions. Capital expenditures (other than expenditures associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl) are expected to be used for investment in infrastructure. These capital expenditures are anticipated to enhance reliability and safety, increase resiliency and expand our systems through value-added projects. In addition to dividend payments on CenterPoint Energy’s Common Stock and interest payments on debt, the Registrants’ principal anticipated cash requirements for the remainder of 2025 include the following:
Previous wording
(1)Excludes expenditures for the restoration costs associated with the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl.
Current wording
(1)Excludes expenditures for the restoration costs associated with the May 2024 Storm Events.
Previous wording
The Registrants expect that anticipated cash needs for the remainder of 2024 will be met with borrowings under their credit facilities, proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, anticipated cash flows from operations, and, with respect to CenterPoint Energy and CERC, proceeds from commercial paper. Issuances of debt securities in the capital markets, funds raised in the commercial paper markets, term loans and additional credit facilities may not, however, be available on acceptable terms.
Current wording
The Registrants expect that anticipated cash needs for the remainder of 2025 will be met with available cash flow from operations, as well as cash flows from financing (such as incremental bond issuances including securitization, borrowings under credit facilities, commercial paper issuances or other sources) and investing activities (such as proceeds from divestitures). Such activities may include the issuance of securities in the capital markets as well as proceeds from divestitures. The issuance of securities in the capital markets and borrowings under additional credit facilities and term loans may not, however, be available on acceptable terms. The Registrants may also, from time to time, redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire their outstanding debt securities through open market purchases, tender offers or pursuant to the terms of such securities.
Previous wording
For more information regarding the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, see Notes 6, 11 and 13 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements as well as “Recent Events” in Part I, Item 2 and “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For more information regarding the May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous wording
Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy as discussed in Note 11 and guarantees as discussed in Note 13(b) to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Current wording
Other than Houston Electric’s general mortgage bonds issued as collateral for tax-exempt long-term debt of CenterPoint Energy as discussed in Note 9 and guarantees as discussed in Note 11(c) to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements, the Registrants have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Previous wording
For additional information about Hurricane Beryl, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements as well as “Recent Events” in Part I, Item 2 and “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For additional information about Hurricane Beryl, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous wording
For additional information about the May 2024 Storm Events, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements as well as “Recent Events” in Part I, Item 2 and “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this combined Form 10-Q.
Current wording
For additional information about the May 2024 Storm Events, see Note 6 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous wording
On February 23, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to purchase the Posey Solar project. On October 27, 2021, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the Posey Solar project through a BTA to acquire its solar array assets for a fixed purchase price and approved recovery of costs via a levelized rate over the anticipated 35-year life. Due to community feedback and rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Indiana Electric, along with Arevon, the developer, announced plans in January 2022 to downsize the Posey Solar project to 191 MW. Indiana Electric collaboratively agreed to the scope change, and on February 1, 2023, Indiana Electric entered into an amended and restated BTA that is contingent on further IURC review and approval. On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve the amended BTA. With the passage of the IRA, Indiana Electric can now pursue PTCs for solar projects. Indiana Electric requested that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. On September 6, 2023 the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN. The Posey Solar project is expected to be placed in service in 2025 and recovered through base rates.
Current wording
On February 7, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to approve an amended BTA to purchase the 191 MW Posey Solar project. With the passage of the IRA, Indiana Electric can now pursue PTCs for solar projects. Indiana Electric requested that project costs, net of PTCs, be recovered in rate base rather than a levelized rate, through base rates or the CECA mechanism, depending on which provides more timely recovery. On September 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN. On March 7, 2025, SIGECO completed the acquisition of Posey Solar from Arevon for a purchase price of approximately $357 million. Subsequent to the acquisition, and pursuant to the Posey Solar Merger Agreement, Posey Solar was merged into SIGECO. The Posey Solar project is expected to be placed in service in the second quarter of 2025 and recovered through base rates. For further information, see Note 3 to the Interim Condensed Financial Statements.
Previous wording
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility with installed capacity of 200 MWs through a BTA, consistent with its 2019/2020 IRP that calls for up to 300 MWs of wind generation. The wind project is located in MISO’s Central Region. Indiana Electric received approval from the IURC to recover the costs of the wind facility via the CECA mechanism, which is expected to be placed in service by the end of 2026. On June 6, 2023 the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, thereby authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the wind generating facility. However, as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, Indiana Electric has not entered into any definitive agreement relating to this wind energy generating facility, and it is not certain that a definitive agreement will be entered into at all.
Current wording
On January 10, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC to acquire a wind energy generating facility with installed capacity of 200 MWs through a BTA, consistent with its 2019/2020 IRP that calls for up to 300 MWs of wind generation. The wind project is located in MISO’s Central Region. Indiana Electric received approval from the IURC to recover the costs of the wind facility via the CECA mechanism, which is expected to be placed in service by the end of 2026. On June 6, 2023, the IURC issued an order approving the CPCN, thereby authorizing Indiana Electric to purchase the wind generating facility. However, as of the date of the filing of this combined Form 10-Q, Indiana Electric has not entered into any definitive agreement relating to this wind energy generating facility, and it is not certain that a definitive agreement will be entered into at all.
Previous wording
Indiana Electric also sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25 year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera LLC and Indiana Electric were compelled to renegotiate terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2026.
Current wording
Indiana Electric sought approval in February 2021 for a 100 MW solar PPA with Clenera LLC in Warrick County, Indiana. The request accounted for increased cost of debt related to this PPA, which provides equivalent equity return to offset imputed debt during the 25-year life of the PPA. In October 2021, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar PPA but denied the request to preemptively offset imputed debt in the PPA cost. Due to rising project costs caused by inflation and supply chain issues affecting the energy industry, Clenera LLC and Indiana Electric were compelled to renegotiate terms of the agreement to increase the PPA price. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs are requested to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Warrick County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays and estimated interconnection cost increases, Indiana Electric and Clenera LLC have entered into discussions regarding the future of the project, which is expected to result in the termination of the PPA.
Previous wording
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased. The increase was largely driven by escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the 2021 PPA with certain modifications. On February 22, 2023, the IURC approved the Knox County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection delays, the project in-service date will be delayed from 2024 to 2026. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs were approved to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA with Oriden. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Vermillion County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2026.
Current wording
On August 25, 2021, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 185 MW of solar power, under a 15-year PPA, from Oriden, which is developing a solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, and 150 MW of solar power, under a 20-year PPA, from Origis, which is developing a solar project in Knox County, Indiana. On May 4, 2022, the IURC issued an order approving Indiana Electric to enter into both PPAs. In March 2022, when the results of the MISO interconnection study were completed, Origis advised Indiana Electric that the costs to construct the solar project in Knox County, Indiana had increased. The increase was largely driven by escalating commodity and supply chain costs impacting manufacturers worldwide. In August 2022, Indiana Electric and Origis entered into an amended PPA, which reiterated the terms contained in the 2021 PPA with certain modifications. On February 22, 2023, the IURC approved the Knox County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection delays, the project in-service date will be delayed from 2024 to 2026. On January 17, 2023, Indiana Electric filed a request with the IURC to amend the previously approved PPA with Oriden with certain modifications. Revised purchase power costs were approved to be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the amended PPA with Oriden. On May 30, 2023, the IURC approved the Vermillion County solar amended PPA; however, due to MISO interconnection study delays, the developer disclosed the project in-service date would be delayed to 2028. As of March 31, 2025, Indiana Electric and Oriden had entered into additional discussions regarding the future of the solar project in Vermillion County, Indiana, which is expected to result in the termination of the PPA.
Previous wording
On May 1, 2024, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 147 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Knox County, IL. The facility is targeted to be in operation in early 2026. Indiana Electric expects a decision from the IURC in the fourth quarter of 2024. If Indiana Electric’s request is approved, the purchase power costs will be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA.
Current wording
On April 14, 2025, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 170 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Tama County, Iowa. The facility is targeted to be in operation by the fourth quarter of 2025. Indiana Electric expects a decision from the IURC in the fourth quarter of 2025. If Indiana Electric’s request is approved, the power purchase costs will be recovered through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA.
Previous wording
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The estimated $334 million turbine facility is being constructed at the previous site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and is expected to provide a combined output of 460 MW. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana Electric’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5 mile pipeline will be constructed and operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. The period to challenge FERC’s certificate in a federal district court expired on February 20, 2023. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. The facility is targeted to be operational by mid-year 2025. Recovery of the proposed natural gas combustion turbines and regulatory asset is included in the forecasted test year in the Indiana Electric rate case, which was filed with the IURC on December 5, 2023.
Current wording
On June 17, 2021, Indiana Electric filed a CPCN with the IURC seeking approval to construct two natural gas combustion turbines to replace portions of its existing coal-fired generation fleet. On June 28, 2022, the IURC approved the CPCN. The estimated $334 million turbine facility is being constructed at the previous site of the A.B. Brown power plant in Posey County, Indiana and is expected to provide a combined output of 460 MW. Indiana Electric received approval for depreciation expense and post in-service carrying costs to be deferred in a regulatory asset until the date Indiana Electric’s base rates include a return on and recovery of depreciation expense on the facility. A new approximately 23.5 mile pipeline is constructed and operated by Texas Gas Transmission, LLC to supply natural gas to the turbine facility. FERC granted a certificate to construct the pipeline on October 20, 2022. On January 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit affirmed the FERC’s order granting the certificate. Indiana Electric granted its contractor a full notice to proceed to construct the turbines on December 9, 2022. It is expected that 230 MW of the facility will be operational in the second quarter of 2025, and, due to a transformer manufacturing issue, that the remaining 230 MW of the facility will be operational in the third quarter of 2025. On February 6, 2025, the EPC contractor for Indiana Electric’s proposed natural gas combustion turbines provided a notice to Indiana Electric that the EPC contractor was identifying the impacts of the proposed tariffs on the project and intended to seek an equitable adjustment to the contract price for the project. Indiana Electric received approval from the IURC on February 3, 2025, to recover for each combustion turbine by adjusting base rates as they are placed in service.
Previous wording
CenterPoint Energy’s current and future solar projects have been impacted by delays and/or increased costs. The potential delays and inflationary cost pressures communicated from the developers of our solar projects have been primarily due to (i) unavailability of solar panels and other uncertainties related to DOC anti-dumping and countervailing duties investigation(s), (ii) the December 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on solar modules and other products manufactured in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and (iii) persistent general global supply chain and labor availability issues. On May 15, 2024, based on a petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, the DOC announced the initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. On October 1, 2024, the DOC’s preliminary countervailing duty determination affirmed the petition and established preliminary duty rates. The DOC is expected to issue a preliminary antidumping determination in the fourth quarter of 2024 with final determinations expected in the first quarter of 2025. These impacts could result in cost increases for certain projects, and such impacts may require that we seek additional regulatory review and approvals. Additionally, significant changes to project costs and schedules as a result of these factors could impact the viability of the projects. For more information regarding potential delays, cancellations and supply chain disruptions, see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K.
Current wording
CenterPoint Energy’s current and future solar projects have been impacted by delays and/or increased costs. The potential delays and inflationary cost pressures communicated from the developers of our solar projects have been primarily due to (i) unavailability of solar panels and other uncertainties related to DOC antidumping and countervailing duties investigation(s), (ii) the December 2021 Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act on solar modules and other products manufactured in China’s Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region and (iii) persistent general global supply chain and labor availability issues. On May 15, 2024, based on a petition filed by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, the DOC announced the initiation of antidumping and countervailing duty investigations of silicon photovoltaic cells from Cambodia, Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam. On October 1, 2024, the DOC’s preliminary countervailing duty determination affirmed the petition and established preliminary duty rates. Subsequently, on November 29, 2024, the DOC announced its preliminary affirmative determination in the antidumping investigation and established preliminary dumping rates. On April 21, 2025, the DOC announced its final affirmative determinations in the antidumping and countervailing duty investigations, determining that imports of silicon photovoltaic cells from the aforementioned countries are being dumped into the U.S. market and receiving countervailable subsidies. The International Trade Commission (the “ITC”) has until June 2, 2025 to make its final injury determination. If the ITC makes an affirmative country-specific final injury determination, the DOC will impose certain duty rates on imports of silicon photovoltaic cells from the aforementioned countries. Furthermore, in 2025, the U.S. government has announced and, in certain cases, rescinded, multiple tariffs on several foreign jurisdictions and imports into the United States. Increased tariffs by the United States have led, and may continue to lead, to the imposition of retaliatory tariffs or other measures taken by foreign jurisdictions, which may in turn lead to additional tariffs imposed or measures taken by the United States. These tariffs, as well as new legislation, tariffs, bans, retaliatory trade measures or related governmental action, have already, and may continue to, further negatively impact the supply of solar panels. In addition to supply reductions, these or similar duties, legislation, tariffs, bans and other measures have and may in the future also put upward pressure on prices of these solar energy products, which may reduce our ability to acquire these items in a timely and cost-efficient manner. These impacts have resulted, and may continue to result in, cost increases for certain projects, and such impacts may require that we seek additional regulatory review and approvals. Additionally, significant changes to project costs and schedules as a result of these factors …
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous wording
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS, ECA, CECA and TDSIC), its cost of service adjustments (e.g., RSP and RRA), its decoupling mechanism (e.g., decoupling and SRC), and its energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECR, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR).
Current wording
The Registrants are routinely involved in rate change applications before state regulatory authorities. Those applications include general rate cases, where the entire cost of service of the utility is assessed and reset. In addition, Registrants are periodically involved in proceedings to adjust its capital tracking mechanisms (e.g., CSIA, DCRF, DRR, GRIP, TCOS, ECA, CECA and TDSIC), its decoupling mechanism (e.g., decoupling and SRC), and its energy efficiency cost trackers (e.g., CIP, DSMA, EECRF, EEFC and EEFR).
Previous wording
Minnesota Rate Case. On November 1, 2023, CERC filed an application with the MPUC requesting an adjustment to delivery charges in 2024 and 2025 for the natural gas business in Minnesota. The requested increase is approximately 6.5% or $85 million for 2024 and an additional approximately 3.7% or $52 million for 2025. The need for a rate change is primarily driven by the continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflects a proposed 10.3% ROE on a 52.5% equity ratio. Interim rates for 2024 of $69 million, subject to refund, were implemented as of January 1, 2024. A request for interim rates of $33 million for 2025 was filed on September 30, 2024 and decision on 2025 interim rates is expected in the fourth quarter of 2024. A pretrial and settlement conference is scheduled for December 16, 2024 and the anticipated decision date of the rate case is July 1, 2025.
Current wording
Minnesota Gas Rate Case. On November 1, 2023, CERC filed an application with the MPUC requesting an adjustment to delivery charges in 2024 and 2025 for the natural gas business in Minnesota. The requested increase is approximately 6.5% or $85 million for 2024 and an additional approximately 3.7% or $52 million for 2025. The need for a rate change is primarily driven by continuing investment in the safety and reliability of the natural gas system, including new Intelis natural gas meters that feature an integrated safety shutoff valve, changes to depreciation rates that better reflect the actual life and salvage characteristics of assets, and changes in other costs to serve customers. The request reflects a proposed 10.3% ROE on a 52.5% equity ratio. Interim rates for 2024 of $69 million, subject to refund, were implemented as of January 1, 2024. A request for interim rates of $33 million for 2025 was filed on September 30, 2024, approved at the December 3, 2024 hearing and approved by an order issued December 20, 2024. A unanimous settlement agreement was filed on November 25, 2024. The settlement provided for an increase of $60.8 million for 2024 and an additional $42.7 million for 2025. The parties agreed to an overall cost of capital of 7.07% for 2024 and 2025. The ALJ filed a report on February 13, 2025 recommending that the MPUC approve the settlement agreement. As required by the December 20, 2024 order, the difference between 2024 interim rates and the settled amount of $60.8 million was refunded to customers in March 2025. Exceptions to the ALJ report were filed on April 18, 2025. The anticipated decision date of the rate case is July 1, 2025.
Previous wording
Houston Electric Rate Case. On March 6, 2024, Houston Electric filed an application with the PUCT requesting authority to change rates and charges for electric transmission and distribution service. The requested increase is approximately $17 million (1%) for retail customers and $43 million (6.6%) for wholesale transmission service, excluding TCRF and rate case expenses. Texas law mandates that electric utilities file a base rate proceeding no later than every four years from the date of their last base rate proceeding final order. Houston Electric’s most recent base rate proceeding order was approved by the PUCT on March 9, 2020, in Docket No. 49421. Therefore, Houston Electric was required to file its next base rate proceeding no later than March 9, 2024. The need for a rate increase is primarily driven by the continuing investment that has been made to support customer growth and to bolster the safety and reliability of Houston Electric’s transmission and distribution system. The request reflects a proposed 10.4% ROE and a 45% equity ratio. Errata testimony was filed to correct minor errors included in the initial filing which reduced the requested increase to $56 million compared to current rates. Intervenor and PUCT staff testimony was filed in June 2024. Rebuttal testimony was due on July 12, 2024 and Houston Electric filed rebuttal testimony from 13 witnesses that covered issues other than operations; however, due to their significant operational responsibilities associated with Houston Electric’s emergency operations plan and response to Hurricane Beryl, an extension was requested (and granted) for the operations witnesses. A hearing on the merits was scheduled to start in late July 2024. On July 17, 2024, Houston Electric filed an unopposed motion to abate the pending deadlines in order to provide additional time to facilitate the continued settlement discussions; the motion was granted on the same day. On August 1, 2024, Houston Electric announced that it was withdrawing its base rate application with the PUCT requesting authority to change rates and charges for electric transmission and distribution service in order to focus on addressing the impacts of Hurricane Beryl in its service territory and accelerating preparedness and resiliency efforts for the remaining storm season. Intervenors filed a motion to challenge the withdrawal of the base rate proceeding. PUCT staff and the Office of Public Utility Counsel filed a letter in support of such withdrawal. On August 16, 2024, the ALJ issued an order denying the requested withdrawal of the base rate proceeding, leaving the base rate proceeding abated. On August 23, 2024, Houston Electric filed an appeal of the ALJ’s order to the PUCT. On September 12, 2024, the PUCT issued an order extending the time to act on Houston Electric’s appeal. On October 24, 2024, the PUCT heard oral arguments on the appeal and indicated that they will decide the appeal on November 14, 2024.
Current wording
Houston Electric Rate Case. On March 6, 2024, Houston Electric filed an application with the PUCT requesting authority to change rates and charges for electric transmission and distribution service. The requested increase was approximately $17 million (1%) for retail customers and $43 million (6.6%) for wholesale transmission service, excluding TCRF and rate case expenses. The need for a rate increase was primarily driven by continuing investment that has been made to support customer growth and to bolster the safety and reliability of Houston Electric’s transmission and distribution system. The request reflected a proposed 10.4% ROE and a 45% equity ratio. Errata testimony was filed to correct minor errors included in the initial filing which reduced the requested increase to $56 million compared to then-current rates. Houston Electric reached a settlement agreement with certain parties and submitted the agreement to the PUCT on January 29, 2025. The settlement reflects a $47 million reduction in annual revenues and a 9.65% ROE and a weighted average cost of capital of 6.606% based upon an as-filed 4.29% cost of debt, an agreed ROE of 9.65% and an agreed regulatory capital structure of 56.75% long-term debt and 43.25% equity. A final order approving the settlement agreement was issued by the PUCT on March 13, 2025.
Previous wording
The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2023 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q:
Current wording
The table below reflects significant applications pending or completed since the Registrants’ combined 2024 Form 10-K was filed with the SEC through the date of the filing of this combined Form 10-Q:
Previous wording
Greenhouse Gas Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
Current wording
Greenhouse Gas and Climate-Related Regulation and Compliance (CenterPoint Energy)
Previous wording
On March 6, 2024, the SEC adopted final rules that require the Registrants to disclose certain climate-related information in registration statements and annual reports. The final rules require Registrants to disclose, among other things, material climate-related risks, activities to mitigate such risks and information about the Registrants’ board of directors’ oversight and management’s role in managing material climate-related risks. The final rule also requires the Registrants to provide information related to any climate-related targets or goals that are material to the Registrants’ businesses, results of operations, or financial condition. Litigation challenging the new rule was filed by multiple parties in multiple jurisdictions, which have been consolidated and assigned to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On April 4, 2024, the SEC announced that it is voluntarily delaying the implementation of the climate disclosure regulations while the U.S. Court of Appeals considers the litigation. While a majority of the reporting requirements would have been applicable to the Registrants in the fiscal year beginning in 2025, with the addition of assurance reporting for GHG inventories starting in 2029 for large accelerated filers, as of April 12, 2024, the effective date of the final rules has been delayed indefinitely and the SEC has indicated that it will publish a document in the Federal Register at the conclusion of the stay addressing a new effective date for the final rules. The Registrants continue to evaluate the impact of the final rules on their respective consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
Current wording
On March 6, 2024, the SEC adopted final rules that require the Registrants to disclose certain climate-related information in registration statements and annual reports. Litigation challenging the rules was filed by multiple parties in multiple jurisdictions, which was consolidated and assigned to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. On April 4, 2024, the SEC announced it was voluntarily delaying the implementation of the climate disclosure rules while the U.S. Court of Appeals considered the litigation, and on March 27, 2025, the SEC voted to end the defense of the rules in the litigation.
Previous wording
CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emissions goals are aligned with Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan and are expected to position Indiana Electric to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions reductions. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than TEEEF, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. For example, Minnesota has enacted the Natural Gas Innovation Act that seeksto provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions. Further, certain local government bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates. For example, Minneapolis has adopted carbon emission reduction goals in an effort to decrease reliance on natural gas. Additionally, cities in Minnesota within CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas operational footprint are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in buildings and focus on electrification. Also, Minnesota cities may consider seeking legislative authority for the ability to enact voluntary enhanced energy standards for all development projects. These initiatives could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations, and this impact could increase if other cities and jurisdictions in its service area enact similar initiatives. Further, our third-party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate change laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses.
Current wording
CenterPoint Energy’s net zero emissions goals are aligned with Indiana Electric’s generation transition plan and are expected to position Indiana Electric to comply with anticipated future regulatory requirements related to GHG emissions reductions. Houston Electric, in contrast to some electric utilities including Indiana Electric, does not generate electricity, other than through TEEEF, and thus is not directly exposed to the risk of high capital costs and regulatory uncertainties that face electric utilities that burn fossil fuels to generate electricity. Nevertheless, Houston Electric’s and Indiana Electric’s revenues could be adversely affected to the extent any resulting regulatory action has the effect of reducing consumption of electricity by ultimate consumers within their respective service territories. Likewise, incentives to conserve energy or to use energy sources other than natural gas could result in a decrease in demand for the Registrants’ services. For example, Minnesota has enacted the Natural Gas Innovation Act that seeksto provide customers with access to renewable energy resources and innovative technologies, with the goal of reducing GHG emissions. Further, certain local government bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain specified dates. For example, Minneapolis has adopted carbon emission reduction goals in an effort to decrease reliance on natural gas. Additionally, cities in Minnesota within CenterPoint Energy’s Natural Gas operational footprint are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in buildings and focus on electrification. Also, Minnesota cities may consider seeking legislative authority for the ability to enact voluntary enhanced energy standards for all development projects. These initiatives could have a significant impact on CenterPoint Energy and its operations, and this impact could increase if other cities and jurisdictions in its service area enact similar initiatives. Further, our third-party suppliers, vendors and partners may also be impacted by climate-related laws and regulations, which could impact CenterPoint Energy’s business by, among other things, causing permitting and construction delays, project cancellations or increased project costs passed on to CenterPoint Energy. Conversely, regulatory actions that effectively promote the consumption of natural gas because of its lower emissions characteristics relative to other fossil fuels would be expected to benefit CenterPoint Energy and CERC and their natural gas-related businesses. At this time, however, we cannot quantify the magnitude of the impacts from possible new regulatory actions related to GHG emissions, either positive or negative, on the Registrants’ businesses.
Showing the first 40 of 53 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
On May 1, 2024, Indiana Electric filed with the IURC seeking approval to purchase 147 MW of wind power under a 25-year PPA with an affiliate of NextEra Energy, Inc., which is developing a wind project in Knox County, Illinois. On November 6, 2024, the IURC approved the Knox County wind PPA, which provided for the recovery of the purchase power costs through the fuel adjustment clause proceedings over the term of the PPA. The facility is targeted to be in operation in early 2026.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (2)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl. Houston Electric’s service territory experienced sudden and destructive severe weather events in May 2024 that included hurricane-like winds and tornadoes. Subsequently, on July 8, 2024, Hurricane Beryl made landfall in Texas, bringing sustained winds, storm surges and torrential rain into Houston Electric’s service territory. The May 2024 Storm Events and Hurricane Beryl caused significant damage to Houston Electric’s electric delivery system and resulted in electric service interruptions peaking at an estimated 922,000 customers and more than 2.1 million customers, respectively.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Minnesota Legislation (CenterPoint Energy and CERC)