Skip to main content

HOPE BANCORP INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 26, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2024 · Filed Feb 26, 2025

HOPE$13.36+1.4%Stored close · as of Nov 9, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-28.

0001128361-24-000006

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-26.

0001128361-25-000010

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 74 previous paragraphs and 78 current paragraphs.

60 unchanged; 14 reworded; 4 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (4)

Current report

Changes in U.S. trade policies, including the imposition of tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, may adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The current Presidential Administration has signaled that tariffs and retaliatory tariffs, as well as other trade restrictions, may be imposed against U.S. trading partners. In response to tariffs, foreign countries have implemented, or may implement, retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods. Historically, tariffs have led to increased trade and political tensions. Political tensions as a result of trade policies could reduce trade volume, investment, technological exchange, and other economic activities between major international economies, resulting in a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets. It may also cause the prices of our customers’ products to increase, which could reduce demand for such products, or reduce our customers' margins, and adversely impact their revenues, financial results, and ability to service debt. This in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, to the extent changes in the political environment have a negative impact on us, or on the markets in which we operate our business, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted in the future. At this time, it remains unclear what the U.S. government or foreign governments will or will not do with respect to additional tariffs that may be imposed or international trade agreements and policies.

Current report

•costs and unpredictability of stockholder litigation in connection with acquisitions;

Current report

The development and use of artificial intelligence (“AI”) presents risks and challenges that may adversely impact the Company’s business. The Company may develop or incorporate AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products in the future. In addition, the Company’s third-party (or fourth-party) vendors, clients, or counterparties may have developed or in the future may develop AI technology in certain business processes, services, or products. The development and use of AI presents a number of risks and challenges to the Company’s business. The legal and regulatory environment relating to AI is uncertain and rapidly evolving, both in the U.S. and internationally, and includes regulatory schemes targeted specifically at AI as well as provisions in intellectual property, privacy, consumer protection, employment, and other laws applicable to the use of AI. These evolving laws and regulations could require changes in the Company’s implementation of AI technology and increase the Company’s compliance costs and the risk of non-compliance. AI models, particularly generative AI models, may produce output or take action that is incorrect, that reflects biases included in the data on which they are trained, that results in the release of private, confidential, or proprietary information, that infringes on the intellectual property rights of others, or that is otherwise harmful. In addition, the complexity of many AI models makes it difficult to understand why they are generating particular outputs. This limited transparency increases the challenges associated with assessing the proper operation of AI models, understanding, and monitoring the capabilities of the AI models, reducing erroneous output, eliminating bias, and complying with regulations that require documentation or explanation of the basis on which decisions are made. Further, the Company may rely on AI models developed by third parties, and, to that extent, would be dependent in part on the manner in which those third parties develop and train their models, including risks arising from the inclusion of any unauthorized material in the training data for their models and the effectiveness of the steps these third parties have taken to limit the risks associated with the output of their models, matters over which the Company may have limited visibility. Any of these risks could expose the Company to liability or adverse legal or regulatory consequences and harm the Company’s reputation and the public perception of its business or the effectiveness of its security measures.

Current report

We cannot predict whether or in what form any other proposed regulations or statutes will be adopted or the extent to which our business may be affected by any new regulation or statute. These changes become less predictable, yet more likely to occur, following the transition of power from one presidential administration to another. Any such changes could subject our business to additional costs, limit the types of financial services and products we may offer and increase the ability of non-banks to offer competing financial services and products, among other things. Moreover, the turnover of the presidential administration is expected to result in certain changes in the leadership and senior staffs of the federal banking agencies. Such changes are likely to impact the rulemaking, supervision, examination and enforcement priorities and policies of the agencies. In addition, changes in key personnel at the agencies that regulate such banking organizations, including the federal banking agencies, may result in differing interpretations of existing rules and guidelines and potentially different enforcement priorities than previously. The potential impact of any changes in agency personnel, policies, priorities, and interpretations on the financial services sector, including us, cannot be predicted.
Reworded paragraphs (14)

Previous wording

We have a high level of loans secured by real estate collateral. A downturn in the real estate market may seriously impair our loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 64% of our loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by various types of commercial real estate (excluding 1-4 family residential mortgage loans). A slowdown in the economy is often accompanied by declines in the value of real estate, which may have a material and adverse effect on our net income and capital levels.

Current wording

We have a high level of loans secured by real estate collateral. A downturn in the real estate market may seriously impair our loan portfolio. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 63% of our loan portfolio consisted of loans secured by various types of commercial real estate (excluding 1-4 family residential mortgage loans). A slowdown in the economy is often accompanied by declines in the value of real estate, which may have a material and adverse effect on our net income and capital levels.

Previous wording

Our commercial loan and commercial real estate loan portfolios expose us to risks. Charge-offs on commercial and commercial real estate loans may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios. The payment experience on commercial real estate loans that are secured by income producing properties are typically dependent on the successful operation of the related property tenants and thus, may subject us to adverse conditions in the real estate market or to the general economy. The collateral securing these loans typically cannot be liquidated as easily as residential real estate. If we foreclose on these loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than residential properties because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral.

Current wording

Our commercial loan and commercial real estate loan portfolios expose us to risks. Charge-offs on commercial and commercial real estate loans may be larger on a per loan basis than those incurred with our residential or consumer loan portfolios. The payment experience on commercial real estate loans that are secured by income producing properties are typically dependent on the successful operation of the related property tenants and thus, may subject us to adverse conditions in the real estate market or to the general economy. The collateral securing these loans typically cannot be liquidated as easily as residential real estate. If we foreclose on these loans, our holding period for the collateral typically is longer than for residential properties because there are fewer potential purchasers of the collateral.

Previous wording

In addition, with respect to commercial real estate loans, federal and state banking regulators have expressed concerns about weakness in the commercial real estate market. As a result, banking regulators are examining commercial real estate lending activity with heightened scrutiny and may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans to implement more stringent underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of allowances for losses and capital levels as a result of commercial real estate lending growth and exposures. Because a significant portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial real estate loans, the banking regulators may require us to maintain higher levels of capital than we would otherwise be expected to maintain, which could limit our ability to leverage our capital and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

In addition, with respect to commercial real estate loans, federal and state banking regulators have expressed concerns about weakness in the commercial real estate market. As a result, banking regulators are examining commercial real estate lending activity with heightened scrutiny and may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loan growth or exposure to implement more stringent underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of allowances for losses and capital levels. Because a significant portion of our loan portfolio is comprised of commercial real estate loans, the banking regulators may require us to maintain higher levels of capital than we would otherwise be expected to maintain, which could limit our ability to leverage our capital and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Previous wording

Our allowance for credit losses may not cover our actual loan losses. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be paid timely or at all or that the value of any collateral supporting a loan will be insufficient to cover our outstanding exposure. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, we maintain an allowance for credit losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. If our actual credit losses exceed the amount we have allocated for estimated current expected credit losses, our business will be adversely affected. We attempt to limit the risk that borrowers will fail to repay loans by carefully underwriting our loans, but losses nevertheless occur in the ordinary course of business operations. We create allowances for estimated credit losses through provisions that are recorded as reductions in income in our accounting records. We base these allowances on estimates of the following:

Current wording

Our allowance for credit losses may not cover our actual loan losses. As a lender, we are exposed to the risk that the principal of, or interest on, a loan will not be paid timely, or at all, or that the value of any collateral supporting a loan will be insufficient to cover our outstanding exposure. In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”), we maintain an allowance for credit losses to provide for loan defaults and non-performance. If our actual credit losses exceed the amount we have allocated for estimated current expected credit losses, our business will be adversely affected. We attempt to limit the risk that borrowers will fail to repay loans by carefully underwriting our loans, but losses nevertheless occur in the ordinary course of business operations. We create allowances for estimated credit losses through provisions that are recorded as reductions in income in our accounting records. We base these allowances on estimates of the following:

Previous wording

Increases in the level of our problem assets, occurrence of operating losses or a failure to comply with requirements of the agencies which regulate us may result in regulatory actions against us which may materially and adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock. The DFPI, the FDIC, and the FRB each have authority to take actions to require that we comply with applicable regulatory capital requirements, cease engaging in what they perceive to be unsafe or unsound practices or make other changes in our business. Among others, the corrective measures that such regulatory authorities may take include requiring us to enter into informal or formal agreements regarding our operations, the issuance of cease and desist orders to refrain from engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, removal of officers and directors and the assessment of civil monetary penalties. See Item 1 “Business – Supervision and Regulation” for a further description of such regulatory powers.

Current wording

Increases in the level of our problem assets, occurrence of operating losses or a failure to comply with requirements of the agencies that regulate us may result in regulatory actions against us, which may materially and adversely affect our business and the market price of our common stock. The DFPI, the FDIC, and the FRB each have authority to take actions to require that we comply with applicable regulatory capital requirements, cease engaging in what they perceive to be unsafe or unsound practices or make other changes in our business. Among others, the corrective measures that such regulatory authorities may take include requiring us to enter into informal or formal agreements regarding our operations, the issuance of cease and desist orders to refrain from engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, removal of officers and directors, or the assessment of civil monetary penalties. See Item 1 “Business – Supervision and Regulation” for a further description of such regulatory powers.

Previous wording

Changes in interest rates affect our profitability. The interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, and deposit taking activities is a significant market risk to us and our business. We derive our income mainly from the difference or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities. In general, the wider the spread, the more net interest income we earn. When market rates of interest change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities will fluctuate. This can cause decreases in our spread and can greatly affect our income. In addition, interest rate fluctuations can affect how much money we may be able to lend. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in minimizing the potentially adverse effects of changes in interest rates.

Current wording

Changes in interest rates affect our profitability. The interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, and deposit taking activities is a significant market risk to us and our business. We derive our income mainly from the difference or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest bearing liabilities. In general, the wider the spread, the more net interest income we earn. When market interest rates change, the interest we receive on our assets and the interest we pay on our liabilities will fluctuate. This can cause decreases in our spread and can greatly affect our income. In addition, interest rate fluctuations can affect how much money we may be able to lend. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in minimizing the potentially adverse effects of changes in interest rates.

Previous wording

We are exposed to the risks of natural disasters. A significant portion of our operations are concentrated in Southern California, which is an earthquake and fire prone region. A major earthquake or fire may result in material loss to us. A significant percentage of our loans are and will be secured by real estate. Many of our borrowers may suffer uninsured property damage, experience interruption of their businesses or lose their jobs after an earthquake or fire. Those borrowers might not be able to repay their loans, and the collateral for such loans may decline significantly in value. Unlike a bank with operations that are more geographically diversified, we are vulnerable to greater losses if an earthquake, fire, flood, mudslide or other natural catastrophe occurs in Southern California.

Current wording

We are exposed to the risks of natural disasters. A significant portion of our operations are concentrated in Southern California, which is an earthquake and fire prone region. A major earthquake or fire in the Greater Los Angeles Area may result in material loss to us. A significant percentage of our loans are and will be secured by real estate. Our borrowers may suffer uninsured property damage, experience interruption of their businesses or lose their jobs after an earthquake or fire. Those borrowers might not be able to repay their loans, and the collateral for such loans may decline significantly in value. Unlike a bank with operations that are more geographically diversified, we are vulnerable to greater losses if an earthquake, fire, flood, mudslide, or other natural catastrophe occurs in Southern California. The Greater Los Angeles Area fires in early 2025 did not have material impact to the Company or its borrowers.

Previous wording

We may experience adverse effects from acquisitions. We have acquired other banking companies and bank offices in the past, and will consider additional acquisitions as opportunities arise. If we do not adequately address the financial and operational risks associated with acquisitions of other companies, we may incur material unexpected costs and disruption of our business. Future acquisitions may increase the degree of such risks.

Current wording

We may experience adverse effects from acquisitions. We have acquired other banking companies and bank offices in the past, and will consider additional acquisitions as opportunities arise. For example, on April 26, 2024, we entered into a merger agreement with Territorial Bancorp Inc. See Item 1 “Business-Business Overview” and Note 24 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information about our pending merger with Territorial Bancorp Inc. If we do not adequately address the financial and operational risks associated with acquisitions of other companies, we may incur material unexpected costs and disruption of our business. Future acquisitions may increase the degree of such risks.

Previous wording

Fraudulent activity or breaches or failures of our information system controls, including those related to cybersecurity incidents, could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a financial institution, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity and security breaches, including those related to cybersecurity incidents, that may materially and adversely affect us or our clients or our third-party service providers. Fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, phishing, social engineering, and other dishonest acts. Information system breaches and other cybersecurity threats may include fraudulent or unauthorized access to systems used by us or our clients, denial or degradation of service attacks, and ransomware or other cyber-attacks. There continues to be a rise in electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches, and cyber-attacks within the financial services industry, especially in the commercial banking sector due to cyber criminals targeting commercial bank accounts. Consistent with industry trends, we have also experienced an increase in attempted electronic fraudulent activity and information system breaches in recent periods.

Current wording

Fraudulent activity or breaches or failures of our information system controls, including those related to cybersecurity incidents, could have a material adverse effect on our business. As a financial institution, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity and security breaches, including those related to cybersecurity incidents, that may materially and adversely affect us or our clients or our third-party service providers. Fraudulent activity may take many forms, including check fraud, electronic fraud, wire fraud, social engineering, and other dishonest acts. Information system breaches and other cybersecurity threats may include fraudulent or unauthorized access to systems used by us or our clients, denial or degradation of service attacks, and ransomware or other cyber-attacks. There continues to be a rise in electronic fraudulent activity, security breaches, and cyber-attacks within the financial services industry, especially in the commercial banking sector due to cyber criminals targeting commercial bank accounts. Consistent with industry trends, we have also experienced an increase in attempted electronic fraudulent activity and information system breaches in recent periods.

Previous wording

Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks. Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, investor advocacy groups, and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosure, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. Increased ESG related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our financial condition and results of operations. New government regulations could also result in new or more stringent forms of ESG oversight and expand mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure. Additionally, concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and could continue to lead to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior on their own as a result of these concerns. We, along with our customers, will need to respond to new laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. We may also face cost increases, asset value reductions, and operating process changes, among other impacts. In addition, we could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans.

Current wording

Diverse views, increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks. Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, investor advocacy groups, and other stakeholders related to their ESG practices and disclosure, especially as they relate to the environment, health and safety, diversity, labor conditions, and human rights. Increased ESG related compliance costs could result in increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with regulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to do business with certain partners, and our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, views about ESG are diverse and rapidly changing. In recent years, "anti-ESG" sentiment has gained momentum across the U.S., with several states and Congress having proposed or enacted "anti-ESG" policies, legislation, or initiatives. Recently an executive order was issued that opposes diversity and inclusion ("DEI") initiatives in the private sector. Institutional investors and proxy advisory firms have also updated or are in the process of updating their guidelines and expectations with respect to ESG and DEI initiatives. New and changing state or federal government regulations could result in additional compliance obligations, expand mandatory and voluntary reporting, diligence, and disclosure, and could result in our sustaining reputational harm, which could adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations and could have an adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock. Additionally, concerns over the long-term impacts of climate change have led and could continue to lead to governmental efforts around the world to mitigate those impacts. Consumers and businesses also may change their behavior on their own as a result of these concerns. We, along with our customers, will need to respond to new or changing laws and regulations as well as consumer and business preferences resulting from climate change concerns. We may also face cost increases, asset value reductions, and operating process changes, among other impacts. In addition, we could face reductions in creditworthiness on the part of some customers or in the value of assets securing loans.

Previous wording

As we expand outside our traditional geographic markets, we may encounter additional risks that may adversely affect us. Currently, the majority of our offices are located in California, but we also have offices in the greater New York City, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Tampa, and Seattle metropolitan areas, New Jersey, Virginia, Colorado, Georgia, and Alabama. Over time, we may seek to establish offices in other parts of the United States as well. We may encounter significant risks, including unfamiliarity with the characteristics and business dynamics of new markets, increased marketing and administrative expenses and operational difficulties arising from our efforts to attract business in new markets, manage operations in noncontiguous geographic markets, comply with local laws and regulations and effectively and consistently manage our non-California personnel and business. If we are unable to manage these risks, our operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Current wording

As we expand outside our traditional geographic markets, we may encounter additional risks that may adversely affect us. Currently, the majority of our offices are located in California, but we also have branches or loan production offices in the greater New York City area, Chicago, Houston, Dallas, Tampa, and Seattle metropolitan areas, New Jersey, Colorado, Georgia, and Alabama. Over time, we may seek to establish offices in other parts of the United States as well. We may encounter significant risks, including unfamiliarity with the characteristics and business dynamics of new markets, increased marketing and administrative expenses and operational difficulties arising from our efforts to attract business in new markets, manage operations in noncontiguous geographic markets, comply with local laws and regulations and effectively, and consistently manage our non-California personnel and business. If we are unable to manage these risks, our operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Previous wording

In addition, bank regulatory authorities have the authority to bring enforcement actions against banks and bank holding companies, including the Bank and Hope Bancorp, for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule or regulation, any condition imposed in writing by the appropriate bank regulatory agency or any written agreement with the authority. Enforcement actions against us could include a federal conservatorship or receivership for the bank, the issuance of additional orders that could be judicially enforced, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, the issuance of directives to enter into a strategic transaction, whether by merger or otherwise, with a third party, the termination of insurance of deposits, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders. In addition, as we have grown over $10 billion in assets, we are subject to enhanced CFPB examination and required to perform more comprehensive stress-testing on our business and operations.

Current wording

In addition, bank regulatory authorities have the authority to bring enforcement actions against banks and bank holding companies, including the Bank and Hope Bancorp, for unsafe or unsound practices in the conduct of their businesses or for violations of any law, rule or regulation, any condition imposed in writing by the appropriate bank regulatory agency or any written agreement with the authority. Enforcement actions against us could include a federal conservatorship or receivership for the bank, the issuance of additional orders that could be judicially enforced, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, the issuance of directives to enter into a strategic transaction, whether by merger or otherwise, with a third party, the termination of insurance of deposits, the issuance of removal and prohibition orders against institution-affiliated parties, and the enforcement of such actions through injunctions or restraining orders. In addition, as we are over $10 billion in assets, we are subject to enhanced CFPB examination and required to perform more comprehensive stress-testing on our business and operations.

Previous wording

The sales of SBA 7(a) loans results in both premium income at the time of sale and a stream of future servicing income. We may not be able to continue originating these loans or selling them in the secondary market. Furthermore, even if we are able to continue originating and selling SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market, we might not continue to realize premiums upon the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loans. When we sell the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans, we incur credit risk on the non-guaranteed portion of the loans, and if a customer defaults on the non-guaranteed portion of a loan, we share any loss and recovery related to the loan pro-rata with the SBA. If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant technical deficiencies in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded or serviced by us, the SBA may seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency from us, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Current wording

The sales of SBA 7(a) loans result in both premium income at the time of sale and a stream of future servicing income. We may not be able to continue originating these loans or selling them in the secondary market. Furthermore, even if we are able to continue originating and selling SBA 7(a) loans in the secondary market, we might not continue to realize premiums upon the sale of the guaranteed portion of these loans. When we sell the guaranteed portion of our SBA 7(a) loans, we incur credit risk on the non-guaranteed portion of the loans, and if a customer defaults on the non-guaranteed portion of a loan, we share any loss and recovery related to the loan pro-rata with the SBA. If the SBA establishes that a loss on an SBA guaranteed loan is attributable to significant technical deficiencies in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded or serviced by us, the SBA may seek recovery of the principal loss related to the deficiency from us, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Previous wording

We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutions. The recent failures of some depository institutions have raised concerns among depositors that their deposits may be at risk. While we believe the Bank is operated in a safe and sound manner, a market-wide loss of depositor confidence caused by the failures, or the perceived unsoundness, of other depository institutions could lead to deposit outflows at the Bank, potentially at levels that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.

Current wording

We may be adversely affected by the lack of soundness of other financial institutions. The failures of some depository institutions in 2023 have raised concerns among depositors that their deposits may be at risk. While we believe the Bank is operated in a safe and sound manner, a market-wide loss of depositor confidence caused by the failures, or the perceived unsoundness, of other depository institutions could lead to deposit outflows at the Bank, potentially at levels that could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.