Armata Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
For the period ended Jun 30, 2026. Filed Aug 12, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2026 · Filed Aug 12, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-13.
0001104659-26-060333
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-06-30; filed 2026-08-12.
0001104659-26-094907
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 118 previous paragraphs and 129 current paragraphs.
63 unchanged; 48 reworded; 15 added; 4 removed; 3 previous and 3 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 20 previous and 26 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (15)
Current report
A statistically significant increase in clinical response rate was observed at TOC for AP-SA02 (day 12) in AP-SA02 treated subjects (88%; 21/24) versus placebo (58%; 7/12) (p = 0.047) as assessed by blinded site investigators, and 83% (20/24) in the AP-SA02 group versus 58% (7/12) in the placebo group as assessed by the blinded CEAC. At TOC for BAT and at EOS, 100% of the AP-SA02 treated subjects had clinically responded (p = 0.017) versus 75% of placebo subjects; 25% of placebo subjects were considered non-responsive due to either relapse or treatment failure, consistent with the non-responder rate reported in the literature for recent Phase 3 trials. Supporting the investigator assessment, clinical outcome was assessed by the CEAC, who agreed that subjects who received placebo had a 78% and 75% clinical response rate at TOC with BAT and at EOS, respectively, while 100% of the subjects who received AP-SA02 clinically responded (p = 0.025: TOC BAT; p = 0.020: EOS). To assess the potential impact of unavailable clinical response assessments in the Phase 2a study due to participant withdrawal, loss to follow-up, death, or uncompleted study visits, the Company conducted two exploratory sensitivity analyses among all 42 randomized participants who received at least one dose of AP-SA02 or placebo. Under the two boundary assumptions, participants without an assessable clinical response at a given timepoint were classified either as all responders or as all non-responders. In both analyses, clinical response rates favored AP-SA02 over placebo at Day 12, test of cure following completion of best antibiotic therapy (TOC for BAT), and end of study (EOS), with responder rates for AP-SA02 exceeding those for placebo by 15.4 to 28.2 percentage points. When unavailable assessments were classified as all responders, the differences at TOC for BAT and EOS remained statistically significant (p=0.03). The other comparisons were not statistically significant but consistently favored AP-SA02. Under the assumption that all unavailable assessments were non-responses, the placebo failure rate at TOC for BAT and EOS was approximately 54%, compared with an average failure rate of approximately 32% reported in prior complicated S. aureus bacteremia trials. Conversely, when all unavailable assessments were classified as responses, the placebo failure rate was approximately 15%, below the rate reported in those prior trials. Taken together, these exploratory analyses suggest that the unavailable assessments did not change the direction of the overall finding: clinical response rates were higher with AP-SA02 than with placebo at every assessed timepoint under both assumptions.
Current report
On May 5, 2026, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to AP-SA02. Fast Track designation is intended to facilitate the development and expedite the review of investigational therapies that treat serious conditions and fill an unmet medical need. The designation provides for more frequent interactions with the FDA regarding all aspects of a designated drug’s clinical development program, supporting a more efficient path to registration. Fast Track designation also allows for rolling review of a Biologics License Application (BLA), meaning completed sections may be submitted and reviewed on an ongoing basis rather than waiting for the full application. Additionally, Fast Track-designated programs may also be eligible for Accelerated Approval and Priority Review if supported by clinical data at the time of BLA submission, further supporting a faster path to potential approval and patient access.
Current report
On July 20, 2026, the Company announced significant clinical, regulatory, manufacturing and operational progress:
Current report
Collectively, these milestones support the Company’s planned initiation of its pivotal Phase 3 superiority study (described below), designed to support a future BLA for AP-SA02.
Current report
December 2025 At the Market Offering
Current report
August 2025 Credit Agreement
Current report
Research and development expenses increased by $1.2 million, from $6.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $7.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026.
Current report
Research and development expenses increased by $1.9 million, from $11.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026.
Current report
Clinical trial costs decreased by $1.1 million, from $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, to $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $1.0 million decrease in SA trial costs.
Current report
Clinical trial costs decreased by $1.1 million, from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, to $0.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $1.4 million decrease in SA trial costs partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in AP-PA02 NCFB trial costs.
Current report
Other external research and development costs increased by $0.9 million from $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase in materials purchases for manufacturing runs.
Current report
Personnel-related costs, including employee payroll and related expenses, increased by $1.2 million, from $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $3.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in stock-based compensation, mainly related to option grants issued after the second quarter of 2025.
Current report
Facilities and overhead costs increased by $0.6 million, from $4.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $5.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase in lab equipment maintenance costs and depreciation expense.
Current report
General and administrative expenses were $8.7 million and $5.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase of $2.8 million is primarily related to an increase in stock-based compensation, mainly related to option grants issued after the second quarter of 2025, legal fees, and incentive compensation.
Current report
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we estimated the fair value of the Convertible Loan using an as-converted valuation methodology, assuming a 100% probability of conversion and valuing the common shares issuable upon conversion based on our common stock price as of the measurement dates.
Removed paragraphs (4)
Previous report
Waxman market exclusivity. Further, the QIDP designation makes AP-SA02 eligible for Fast Track status, which provides an opportunity for more frequent meetings and communication with the FDA, priority and rolling review, leading to potential accelerated approval of its BLA. As of the date of this filing, the Company has submitted to the FDA a request for Fast Track Designation for AP-SA02.
Previous report
December 2025 Sales Agreement
Previous report
Research and development expenses increased by $0.7 million, from $5.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $6.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026.
Previous report
On July 29, 2024, we amended the MTEC Agreement and increased the amount of the award by $5.3 million to a total of $21.6 million. We will recognize grant and award revenue from the third quarter of 2024 until the full amount of the amended award is utilized.
Reworded paragraphs (48)
Previous wording
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) is traded on the NYSE American exchange under the symbol “ARMP.” We are headquartered in Los Angeles, California, and we have a research and development facility (the “McConnell Facility”) to support advancing phage products from discovery to the clinic. The facility is also equipped with approximately 10,000 square feet of licensed current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) drug manufacturing suites enabling the production, testing and release of clinical trial material.
Current wording
Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the “Common Stock”) is traded on the NYSE American under the symbol “ARMP.” We are headquartered in Los Angeles, California, and we have a research and development facility (the “McConnell Facility”) to support advancing phage products from discovery to the clinic. The facility is also equipped with approximately 10,000 square feet of licensed current good manufacturing practice (“cGMP”) drug manufacturing suites enabling the production, testing and release of clinical trial material.
Previous wording
We see bacteriophages as a potentially safer and effective alternative to antibiotics and an essential response to the growing bacterial resistance to current classes of antibiotics. Bacteriophages or “phages” have a powerful and highly differentiated mechanism of action that enables binding to and killing of specific targeted bacteria while uniquely preserving the normal human microbiome or “healthy bacteria”. This is in direct contrast to traditional broad-spectrum antibiotics which can alter the human microbiome increasing susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens, such asClostridium difficile. We believe that phages represent a promising means to effectively treat bacterial infections as an alternative to broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially for patients with bacterial infections resistant to current standard of care therapies, including the multidrug-resistant or “superbug” strains of bacteria. We are a leading developer of clinical-stage phage therapeutics of high purity and potency, and believe we are uniquely positioned to address the growing worldwide threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.
Current wording
We view bacteriophages as a potentially safer and more effective critical future alternative to antibiotics and a core response to the growing bacterial resistance to current classes of antibiotics. Bacteriophages or “phages” have a powerful mechanism of action highly differentiated from all current antibiotics, that enables binding to and killing of specific targeted bacteria while uniquely preserving the normal human microbiome or “healthy bacteria”. This is in direct contrast to traditional broad-spectrum antibiotics which can alter the human microbiome increasing susceptibility to opportunistic pathogens, such asClostridium difficile. There have been significant advances in understanding the importance of preserving our gut microbiome which is substantially altered by broad-spectrum antibiotics, uniquely positioning phage therapy as a novel precision-targeted antibacterial treatment. We believe that phages represent a promising means to effectively treat bacterial infections as an alternative to broad-spectrum antibiotics, especially for patients with bacterial infections resistant to current standard of care therapies, including the multidrug-resistant or “superbug” strains of bacteria. We are a leading developer of clinical-stage phage therapeutics of high purity and potency, and believe we are uniquely positioned to address the growing worldwide threat of antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections.
Previous wording
We are combining our proprietary approach and expertise in identifying, characterizing and developing both naturally occurring and engineered bacteriophages with our proprietary phage-specific host-engineered cGMP manufacturing capabilities to advance a clinical pipeline of high-quality bacteriophage product candidates. We believe that we are uniquely advancing two distinct clinical candidates, referred to as AP-PA02 and AP-SA02, targeting two different bacterial pathogens with the potential to treat chronic pulmonary disease complicated by bacterial infection as well as acute systemic bacterial infection. To date, we have completed three critical Phase 2 randomized, double-blind,
Current wording
that we are uniquely advancing two distinct clinical candidates, referred to as AP-PA02 and AP-SA02, targeting two different bacterial pathogens with the potential to treat chronic pulmonary disease complicated by bacterial infection as well as acute systemic bacterial infection. To date, we have completed three critical Phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trials. We have combined our clinical data with rigorous and innovativein vitro science to extend our knowledge of phage biology enabling continued enhancement ofin vivo phage function.
Previous wording
Importantly, we have improved our manufacturing processes, which significantly increases phage titers and purity, and improves production efficiency. Aligned with these improvements, we have been able to reproducibly produce high titer and high purity phages with lot-to-lot consistency, configuring our phage platform for full commercialization with the goal of ensuring commercial viability of our current and future phage product candidates across a variety of potential use cases.
Current wording
Importantly, we have improved our manufacturing processes, which significantly increases phage titers and purity, and improves production efficiency. Aligned with these improvements, we have been able to reproducibly produce high titer and high purity phages with lot-to-lot consistency, configuring our phage platform for full commercialization with the goal of ensuring commercial viability of our current and future phage product candidates across a variety of potential use cases. Our demonstrated ability to reproducibly produce high titer functional phages of the highest purity allows us to administer our phages intravenously opening up a future of potential broad use across direct injection into privileged and closed spaces.
Previous wording
Our first phage candidate, inhaled AP-PA02, is focused primarily on the treatment of chronic pulmonary infections due toPseudomonas aeruginosa (“P. aeruginosa”). On October 14, 2020, we received the approval to proceed from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) for our Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for AP-PA02. In the first quarter of 2023, we announced positive topline results from the completed “SWARM-P.a.” study – a Phase 1b/2a, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of inhaled AP-PA02 in subjects with cystic fibrosis (“CF”) and chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosainfection. Data indicate that AP-PA02 was well-tolerated with a treatment emergent adverse event profile similar to placebo. Pharmacokinetics findings confirm that AP-PA02 can be effectively delivered to the lungs through nebulization with minimal systemic exposure, with single ascending doses and multiple ascending doses resulting in a proportional increase in exposure as measured in induced sputum. AP-PA02 exposures were generally consistent across subjects. Additionally, bacterial levels ofP. aeruginosain the sputum measured at several timepoints suggest improvement in bacterial load reduction for subjects treated with AP-PA02 at the end of treatment as compared to placebo after ten days of dosing. In addition, a correlation was seen between increasing phage dose (higher AP-PA02 exposures) and reduction in the bacterial load, supporting the biologic plausibility of a bacterial specific mechanism of action and creating the opportunity for phage as a therapeutic alternative to inhaled antibiotics. This study was supported by the CFF, which granted us a Therapeutics Development Award of $5.0 million. The total amount of the CFF Award was recognized through December 2023, and the final payment was received in 2024. Following the promising Phase 1b/2a results of favorable safety and tolerability profile and plausible mechanism of action, an additional confirmatory Phase 2 trial was initiated in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (“NCFB”) patients with similar chronic pulmonary disease with infections due toP. aeruginosa.
Current wording
Our first phage candidate, inhaled AP-PA02, is focused primarily on the treatment of chronic pulmonary infections due toPseudomonas aeruginosa (“P. aeruginosa”). On October 14, 2020, we received the approval to proceed from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) for our Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for AP-PA02. In the first quarter of 2023, we announced positive topline results from the completed “SWARM-P.a.” study – a Phase 1b/2a, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose and multiple ascending dose clinical trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of inhaled AP-PA02 in subjects with cystic fibrosis (“CF”) and chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosainfection. Data indicate that AP-PA02 was well-tolerated with a treatment-emergent adverse event profile similar to placebo. Pharmacokinetic findings confirm that AP-PA02 can be effectively delivered to the lungs through nebulization with minimal systemic exposure, with single ascending doses and multiple ascending doses resulting in a proportional increase in exposure as measured in induced sputum. AP-PA02 exposures were generally consistent across subjects. Additionally, bacterial levels ofP. aeruginosain the sputum measured at several timepoints suggest improvement in bacterial load reduction for subjects treated with AP-PA02 at the end of treatment as compared to placebo after ten days of dosing. In addition, a correlation was seen between increasing phage dose (higher AP-PA02 exposures) and reduction in the bacterial load, supporting the biologic plausibility of a bacterial specific mechanism of action and creating the opportunity for phage as a therapeutic alternative to inhaled antibiotics. This study was supported by the CFF, which granted us a Therapeutics Development Award of $5.0 million. The total amount of the CFF Award was recognized through December 2023, and the final payment was received in 2024. Following the promising Phase 1b/2a results of a favorable safety and tolerability profile and a plausible mechanism of action, an additional confirmatory Phase 2 trial was initiated in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (“NCFB”) patients with similar chronic pulmonary disease with infections due toP. aeruginosa.
Previous wording
On February 22, 2022, Armata announced that it had received from the FDA the approval to proceed for our IND application for AP-PA02, in a second indication, NCFB. On December 19, 2024, Armata announced encouraging results from the completed “Tailwind” study – a Phase 2 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, phage kinetics, and efficacy of inhaled AP-PA02 in subjects with NCFB and chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosa infection. Data indicated that inhaled AP-PA02 provides a durable reduction ofP. aeruginosa in the lung, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. The Tailwind study was conducted in two cohorts running in parallel: subjects in one cohort (cohort A) received inhaled AP-PA02 as monotherapy, while subjects in another cohort (cohort B) received inhaled AP-PA02 in combination with inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment. Subjects in both cohorts were dosed at home by nebulization with study drug administered every 12 hours for 10 days and were followed for approximately four weeks after receiving their last dose of study drug. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction inP. aeruginosa colony forming units (“CFUs”) in lung sputum at one week following completion of dosing (day 17) compared to baseline. Per the statistical analysis plan, efficacy analysis of each independent cohort showed no significant difference between subjects treated with AP-PA02 and placebo due to small numbers of subjects in each
Current wording
On February 22, 2022, Armata announced that it had received from the FDA approval to proceed with our IND application for AP-PA02, in a second indication, NCFB. On December 19, 2024, Armata announced encouraging results from the completed “Tailwind” study – a Phase 2 multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety, phage kinetics, and efficacy of inhaled AP-PA02 in subjects with NCFB and chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosa infection. Data indicated that inhaled AP-PA02 provides a durable reduction ofP. aeruginosa in the lung, with a favorable safety and tolerability profile. The Tailwind study was conducted in two cohorts running in parallel: subjects in one cohort (cohort A) received inhaled AP-PA02 as monotherapy, while subjects in another cohort (cohort B) received inhaled AP-PA02 in combination with inhaled anti-pseudomonal antibiotic treatment. Subjects in both cohorts
Previous wording
cohort. Notably, a post-hoc intent-to-treat analysis (n=33 active and n=15 placebo; all subjects from both cohorts) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction ofP. aeruginosa CFUs in the lung at day 17 (AP-PA02 vs. placebo; P=0.05). The reduction inP. aeruginosa CFUs persisted two weeks following completion of dosing with AP-PA02 when compared with placebo at day 24 (AP-PA02 vs. placebo; P=0.015). Additionally, paired analysis ofP. aeruginosa CFU density at baseline compared to day 10 (P=0.03), day 11 (P=0.01), day 17 (P=0.003) and day 24 (P=0.018) was significant in the AP-PA02-treated cohort. We believe the data suggest that AP-PA02 alone is as effective as the combination therapy of phage and antibiotics in reducingP. aeruginosa CFUs in the lung. Additionally, approximately one-third of subjects treated with phage monotherapy exhibited at least a 2-log CFU reduction inP. aeruginosa compared to no reduction in placebo treated subjects. Safety data indicate that inhaled AP-PA02 was well-tolerated with treatment-emergent adverse events mild and self-limiting. There was one possibly related serious adverse event that was linked to an acute pulmonary event requiring hospitalization that was responsive to antibiotics. We believe the safety and tolerability of AP-PA02 offers a promising profile for treating chronically infected NCFB patients.
Current wording
were dosed at home by nebulization with study drug administered every 12 hours for 10 days and were followed for approximately four weeks after receiving their last dose of study drug. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction inP. aeruginosa colony-forming units (“CFUs”) in lung sputum at one week following completion of dosing (day 17) compared to baseline. Per the statistical analysis plan, efficacy analysis of each independent cohort showed no significant difference between subjects treated with AP-PA02 and placebo due to small numbers of subjects in each cohort. Notably, a post-hoc intent-to-treat analysis (n=33 active and n=15 placebo; all subjects from both cohorts) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction ofP. aeruginosa CFUs in the lung at day 17 (AP-PA02 vs. placebo; P=0.05). The reduction inP. aeruginosa CFUs persisted two weeks following completion of dosing with AP-PA02 when compared with placebo at day 24 (AP-PA02 vs. placebo; P=0.015). Additionally, paired analysis ofP. aeruginosa CFU density at baseline compared to day 10 (P=0.03), day 11 (P=0.01), day 17 (P=0.003) and day 24 (P=0.018) was significant in the AP-PA02-treated cohort. We believe the data suggest that AP-PA02 alone is as effective as the combination therapy of phage and antibiotics in reducingP. aeruginosa CFUs in the lung. Additionally, approximately one-third of subjects treated with phage monotherapy exhibited at least a 2-log CFU reduction inP. aeruginosa compared to no reduction in placebo-treated subjects. Safety data indicate that inhaled AP-PA02 was well-tolerated with treatment-emergent adverse events mild and self-limiting. There was one possibly related serious adverse event that was linked to an acute pulmonary event requiring hospitalization that was responsive to antibiotics. We believe the safety and tolerability of AP-PA02 offers a promising profile for treating chronically infected NCFB patients.
Previous wording
Results from the Phase 2 Tailwind study demonstrate the potential of Armata’s high-purity phage cocktail, AP-PA02, as a new monotherapy treatment alternative for chronic pulmonary disease caused byP. aeruginosa infection, including drug-resistant bacteria, and indicate the potential for phage therapy to reduce reliance on chronic antibiotic use. The Phase 2 Tailwind study represents the second successful clinical trial for AP-PA02, Armata’s lead pulmonary candidate, which was first evaluated in people with cystic fibrosis in the Phase 1b/2a SWARM-P.a.trial that completed in 2023. We believe the learnings on dose-schedule regimens gained from the two completed Phase 2 studies position us to define a safe and promising biologic correlation for a Phase 3 definitive trial to evaluate inhaled AP-PA02 as an alternative to antibiotics in chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosainfection.
Current wording
Results from the Phase 2 Tailwind study demonstrate the potential of Armata’s high-purity phage cocktail, AP-PA02, as a new monotherapy treatment alternative for chronic pulmonary disease caused byP. aeruginosa infection, including drug-resistant bacteria, and indicate the potential for phage therapy to reduce reliance on chronic antibiotic use. The Phase 2 Tailwind study represents the second successful clinical trial for AP-PA02, Armata’s lead pulmonary candidate, which was first evaluated in people with cystic fibrosis in the Phase 1b/2a SWARM-P.a.trial that was completed in 2023. We believe the learnings on dose-schedule regimens gained from the two completed Phase 2 studies position us to define a safe and promising biologic correlation for a Phase 3 definitive trial to evaluate inhaled AP-PA02 as an alternative to antibiotics in chronic pulmonaryP. aeruginosainfection.
Previous wording
Based on clinical findings with our intravenously administeredS. aureus phage product candidate AP-SA02 (described below), and the approach that the Company’sP. aeruginosa phage cocktails are formulated with the same high potency and purity standards, we are exploring preclinical development of an intravenously administeredP. aeruginosa phage cocktail for the treatment of acute ventilator-associated pneumonia (“VAP”) and other severe and difficult-to-treat infections caused by antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistantP. aeruginosa. Recognizing the distinct physiology of acute hospitalized pneumonia compared to chronic respiratory infections such as CF and NCFB, we are developing a novel phage cocktail specifically for acute bacterial pneumonia and have leveraged our extensiveP. aeruginosa clinical isolate collection and phage library to identify AP-PA03 as a potential clinical candidate for this indication. Contingent upon securing sufficient funding, we may at the appropriate time in the future file an IND application in order to initiate clinical development of AP-PA03 for the treatment of VAP.
Current wording
Based on clinical findings with our intravenously administeredS. aureus phage product candidate AP-SA02 (described below), and the approach that the Company’sP. aeruginosa phage cocktails are formulated with the same high potency and purity standards, we are exploring preclinical development of an intravenously administeredP. aeruginosa phage cocktail for the treatment of acute ventilator-associated pneumonia (“VAP”) and other severe and difficult-to-treat infections caused by antibiotic-resistant and multidrug-resistantP. aeruginosa. Recognizing the distinct physiology of acute hospitalized pneumonia compared to chronic respiratory infections such as CF and NCFB, we are developing a novel phage cocktail specifically for acute bacterial pneumonia and have leveraged our extensiveP. aeruginosa clinical isolate collection and phage library to identify AP-PA03 as a potential clinical candidate for this indication. Contingent upon securing sufficient funding, we may, at the appropriate time in the future, file an IND application in order to initiate clinical development of AP-PA03 for the treatment of acute pneumonia caused byP. aeruginosa.
Previous wording
A statistically significant increase in clinical response rate was observed at TOC for AP-SA02 (day 12) in AP-SA02 treated subjects (88%; 21/24) versus placebo (58%; 7/12) (p = 0.047) as assessed by blinded site investigators, and 83% (20/24) in the AP-SA02 group versus 58% (7/12) in the placebo group as assessed by the blinded CEAC. At TOC for BAT and at EOS, 100% of the AP-SA02 treated subjects had clinically responded (p = 0.017) versus 25% of placebo subjects considered non-responsive due to either relapse or treatment failure, consistent with the non-responder rate reported in the literature for recent Phase 3 trials. Of note, the clinical response with AP-SA02 occurred regardless of whether subjects were infected with Methicillin-sensitiveS. aureus (“MSSA”) or MRSA. All subjects infected with MRSA and treated with AP-SA02 and BAT cleared their infection by TOC for BAT with no evidence of relapse through EOS, as compared to the relapse rate of BAT alone as noted above. Supporting the investigator assessment, clinical outcome was assessed by the CEAC, who agreed that subjects who received placebo had a 22% and 25% non-responder rate at TOC with BAT and at EOS, respectively, while 100% of the subjects who received AP-SA02 clinically responded (p = 0.025: TOC BAT; p = 0.020: EOS).
Current wording
Of note, the complete clinical response with AP-SA02 occurred regardless of whether subjects were infected with Methicillin-sensitiveS. aureus (“MSSA”) or MRSA. All subjects infected with MRSA and treated with AP-SA02 and BAT cleared their infection by TOC for BAT with no evidence of relapse through EOS, as compared to the relapse rate of BAT alone.
Previous wording
Additionally, and consistent with the clinical response rate, patients treated with AP-SA02 showed trends toward rapid normalization of key predictors of mortality and complications in SAB including C-reactive protein and interleukin-10, shorter time to negative blood culture, quicker time to resolution of signs and symptoms at the infection site, shorter intensive care unit and hospital utilization.
Current wording
Additionally, and consistent with the clinical response rate, patients treated with AP-SA02 showed trends toward rapid normalization of key predictors of mortality and complications in SAB including C-reactive protein and interleukin-10, shorter time to negative blood culture, quicker time to resolution of signs and symptoms at the infection site, and shorter intensive care unit and hospital utilization.
Previous wording
Clinical efficacy was observed independent of the BAT utilized, in that all patients responded despite receiving different classes of antibiotics. The active and placebo arms were well-matched for antibiotics utilized. The clinical response rate also occurred independent of the site of infection, which were well-matched between the active and placebo arms, and were diverse ranging from endocarditis, to osteomyelitis, to septic joints, to deep wounds, and pneumonia. Moreover, phages in AP-SA02 administered systemically by IV push, were able to hone to the site of infection, bind to, penetrate and kill the target bacteria, enabling phage progeny to exit the burst bacteria and reenter the intravascular space including further target any remaining local bacteria. Phage are not able to continue to exist and replicate once all target bacteria have been killed.
Current wording
Clinical efficacy was observed independent of the BAT utilized, in that all patients responded despite receiving different classes of antibiotics. The active and placebo arms were well-matched for antibiotics utilized. The clinical response rate also occurred independent of the site of infection, which were well-matched between the active and placebo arms, and were diverse ranging from endocarditis, to osteomyelitis, to septic joints, to deep wounds, and pneumonia. Moreover, phages in AP-SA02 administered systemically by IV push, were able to home in on the site of infection, bind to, penetrate and kill the target bacteria, enabling phage progeny to exit the burst bacteria and reenter the intravascular space including further target any remaining local bacteria. Phages are not able to continue to exist and replicate once all target bacteria have been killed.
Previous wording
Findings from the Phase 1b/2a study, including the favorable safety and tolerability profile of AP-SA02, inform the design of a larger definitive efficacy study to demonstrate superiority of AP-SA02 in treating complicated SAB. In January 2026, the Company announced the conclusion of an End-of-Phase 2 (“EOP2”) meeting written response from the FDA. The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) division, upon reviewing our detailed EOP2 meeting package, confirmed that the safety and efficacy data from our Phase 2a diSArm study support advancement to Phase 3. The FDA provided critical guidance on key elements of the Phase 3 clinical study design, which will assess the superiority of AP-SA02 over the current standard of care for the treatment of complicatedS. aureus bacteremia. The FDA provided comments on Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (“CMC”) which we are aligning with our existing Phase 3 manufacturing and quality strategy. The FDA also included recommendations for the future Biologics License Application (“BLA”). As of the date of this filing, we are continuing to address many of the clinical and CMC comments from the FDA.
Current wording
Findings from the Phase 1b/2a study, including the favorable safety and tolerability profile of AP-SA02, inform the design of a larger definitive efficacy study to demonstrate superiority of AP-SA02 in treating complicated SAB. In January 2026, the Company announced the conclusion of an End-of-Phase 2 (“EOP2”) meeting written response from the FDA. The FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (“CBER”) division, upon reviewing our detailed EOP2 meeting package, confirmed that the safety and efficacy data from our Phase 2a diSArm study support advancement to Phase 3. The FDA provided critical guidance on key elements of the Phase 3 clinical study design, which will assess the superiority of AP-SA02 over the current standard of care for the treatment of complicatedS. aureus bacteremia. The FDA provided comments on Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (“CMC”) which we are aligning with our existing Phase 3 manufacturing and quality strategy. The FDA also included recommendations for the future Biologics License Application (“BLA”).
Previous wording
On February 20, 2026, under Section 505E of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the FDA designated AP-SA02 for intravenous use as a Qualified Infectious Disease Product Designation (“QIDP”) for adjunct treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistantS. aureus. To achieve QIDP designation, a drug candidate must be intended to treat serious or life-threatening infections, particularly those caused by bacteria and fungi that are resistant to treatment, or that treat qualifying resistant pathogens identified by the FDA. The QIDP designation makes AP-SA02 eligible to benefit from certain incentives for the development of new antibacterials provided under the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (“GAIN”) Act, including an additional five-year extension of Hatch-
Current wording
On February 20, 2026, under Section 505E of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the FDA designated AP-SA02 for intravenous use as a Qualified Infectious Disease Product Designation (“QIDP”) for adjunct treatment of complicated bacteremia caused by methicillin-sensitive or methicillin-resistantS. aureus. To achieve QIDP designation, a drug candidate must be intended to treat serious or life-threatening infections, particularly those caused by bacteria and fungi that are resistant to treatment, or that treat qualifying resistant pathogens identified by the FDA. The QIDP designation makes AP-SA02 eligible to benefit from certain incentives for the development of new antibacterials provided under the Generating Antibiotic Incentives Now (“GAIN”) Act, including an additional five-year extension of Hatch-Waxman market exclusivity.
Previous wording
On June 15, 2020, we entered into an agreement (the “MTEC Agreement”) with the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (“MTEC”), pursuant to which we received a $15.0 million award and entered into a multi-year program administered by the U.S. Department of Defense (the “DoD”) through MTEC and managed by the Naval Medical Research Command – Naval Advanced Medical Development with funding from the Defense Health Agency and Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program. On September 29, 2022, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $1.3 million to $16.3 million and extend the term into the second half of 2024. On July 29, 2024, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $5.3 million to $21.6 million and extend the term into the third quarter of 2025. On April 29, 2025, we received $4.65 million of additional non-dilutive award funding through MTEC, thereby increasing the total MTEC award to $26.2 million, and the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to September 30, 2025. On July 2, 2025, the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to March 31, 2026. On March 26, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to September 30, 2026. This award has been used to partially fund the Phase 1b/2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AP-SA02 for the treatment of adults with complicatedS. aureusbacteremia (the “diSArm” study), and to support activities related to the EOP2 meeting with the FDA.
Current wording
On June 15, 2020, we entered into an agreement (the “MTEC Agreement”) with the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (“MTEC”), pursuant to which we received a $15.0 million award and entered into a multi-year program administered by the U.S. Department of War (the “DoW”) through MTEC and managed by the Naval Medical Research Command – Naval Advanced Medical Development with funding from the Defense Health Agency and Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program. On September 29, 2022, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $1.3 million to $16.3 million and extend the term into the second half of 2024. On July 29, 2024, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $5.3 million to $21.6 million and extend the term into the third quarter of 2025. On April 29, 2025, we received $4.65 million of additional non-dilutive award funding through MTEC, thereby increasing the total MTEC award to $26.2 million, and the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to September 30, 2025. On July 2, 2025, the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to March 31, 2026. On March 26, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to September 30, 2026. On June 22, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $2.5 million to $28.7 million. This award has been used to partially fund the Phase 1b/2a, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose escalation study to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AP-SA02 for the treatment of adults with complicatedS. aureusbacteremia (the “diSArm” study), and to support activities related to the EOP2 meeting with the FDA, as well as to support activities related to the Company’s continued preparation and readiness for its planned Phase 3 clinical study.
Previous wording
The current proposed Phase 3 clinical study design, which incorporates feedback from the Company’s EOP2 meeting with the FDA, is intended to assess the superiority of AP-SA02 administered as an adjunct to 4–6 weeks of BAT for the treatment of adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia. The trial will evaluate clinical response at 7 days post BAT and/or 28 days post BAT as the primary study endpoint, and defined as resolution of all baseline signs and symptoms of bacteremia and negative blood cultures. Secondary endpoints include clinical response at day 14 (TOC), time to hospital discharge, microbiologic eradication evidenced by two consecutive negative blood cultures, andS. aureus-specific and all-cause mortality at day 14, 7 days post BAT and/or 28 days post BAT. The study is expected to enroll approximately 450 patients in a 2:1 randomization, powered to detect a 15% absolute improvement with 90% power at a 0.05 alpha level, and is designed to provide safety data from approximately 300 AP-SA02-treated subjects (receiving the full 7-day course and followed for 28 days post-BAT) to support a potential BLA. Safety and healthcare resource impact analyses will be included.
Current wording
The current proposed Phase 3 clinical study design, which incorporates feedback from the Company’s EOP2 meeting with the FDA, is intended to assess the superiority of AP-SA02 administered as an adjunct to 4–6 weeks of BAT for the treatment of adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia. The trial will evaluate clinical response at 7 days post BAT and/or 28 days post BAT as the primary study endpoint, and defined as resolution of all baseline signs and symptoms of bacteremia and negative blood cultures. Secondary endpoints include clinical response at day 14 (TOC) and time to sustained microbiological eradication. Tertiary endpoints include hospital utilization days,S. aureus-specific mortality at day 14, 7 days post BAT, and 28 days post BAT, health resource utilization, MRSA specific clinical response, participant self-assessment of improvement, and the impact of full AP-SA02 exposure on the primary and secondary endpoints. The study is expected to enroll approximately 450 patients in a 2:1 randomization, powered to detect a 15% absolute improvement with 95% power at a 0.05 alpha level, and is designed to provide safety data from approximately 300 AP-SA02-treated subjects (receiving the full 7-day course and followed for 28 days post-BAT) to support a potential BLA.
Previous wording
The Company believes that, if clinical superiority of AP-SA02 is demonstrated in the Phase 3 registrational study in adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia, it is plausible the Phase 3 safety and efficacy data may potentially drive changes to infectious disease clinical treatment guidelines, requiring the use of AP-SA02 with antibiotics as new standard of care. With demonstration of superiority and following a potential initial approval of AP-SA02 in adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia, the Company believes there may be additional development opportunities for AP-SA02, including use as adjunct therapy with shorter antibiotic treatment durations, and evaluation of AP-SA02 as a potential front-line therapy. Moreover, a potential future bridging study may support label expansion, including expanding into adults with uncomplicatedS. aureus bacteremia, and a potential opportunity to expand into the pediatric population given the high titer formulation of AP-SA02 enables administration at small volume doses.
Current wording
The Company believes that, if clinical superiority of AP-SA02 is demonstrated in the Phase 3 registrational study in adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia, it is plausible the Phase 3 safety and efficacy data may potentially drive changes to Infectious Diseases Society of America (“IDSA”) clinical treatment guidelines, requiring the use of AP-SA02 with antibiotics as new standard of care. With demonstration of superiority and following a potential initial approval of AP-SA02 in adults with complicatedS. aureus bacteremia, the Company believes there may be additional development opportunities for AP-SA02, including use as adjunct therapy with shorter antibiotic treatment durations, and evaluation of AP-SA02 as a potential front-line therapy. Moreover, a potential future bridging study may support label expansion, including expanding into adults with uncomplicatedS. aureus bacteremia, and a potential opportunity to expand into the pediatric population given the high titer formulation of AP-SA02 enables administration at small volume doses.
Previous wording
On August 1, 2022, we announced FDA approval to proceed with our IND application for AP-SA02 in a second indication, PJI withS. aureus. We had planned to initiate a Phase 1b/2a trial; however, in light of the growing concerns of both PJI and wound infections, we are considering revising the protocol to include both indications. Driven by data
Current wording
On August 1, 2022, we announced FDA approval to proceed with our IND application for AP-SA02 in a second indication, PJI withS. aureus. We had planned to initiate a Phase 1b/2a trial; however, in light of the growing concerns of both PJI and wound infections, we are considering revising the protocol to include both indications. Driven by data from the bacteremia studies, and with sufficient funding, we may in the future initiate a Phase 1b/2a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous and intra-articular AP-SA02 as an adjunct to standard of care antibiotics in adults undergoing treatment of periprosthetic joint infections and/or wound infections caused byS. aureus.
Previous wording
Department of Defense (DoD) award received through the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) and managed by the Naval Medical Research Command (NMRC) – Naval Advanced Medical Development (NAMD) with funding from the Defense Health Agency and Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.
Current wording
Department of War (DoW) award received through the Medical Technology Enterprise Consortium (MTEC) and managed by the Naval Medical Research Command (NMRC) – Naval Advanced Medical Development (NAMD) with funding from the Defense Health Agency and Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program.
Previous wording
We have incurred net losses since our inception and our operations to date have been primarily limited to research and development and raising capital. As of March 31, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $616.9 million. We currently expect to use our existing cash and cash equivalents for the focused research and development of our current product candidates and for working capital and other general corporate purposes. We anticipate that a substantial portion of our capital resources and efforts in the foreseeable future will be focused on completing the development of and seeking to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates. We do not expect to generate product revenue unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain marketing approval for at least one of our product candidates. We may also use a portion of our existing cash and cash equivalents for the potential acquisition of, or investment in, product candidates, technologies, formulations or companies that complement our business, although we have no current understandings, commitments or agreements to do so.
Current wording
We have incurred net losses since our inception, and our operations to date have been primarily limited to research and development and raising capital. As of June 30, 2026, we had an accumulated deficit of $542.7 million. We currently expect to use our existing cash and cash equivalents for the focused research and development of our current product candidates, working capital, and other general corporate purposes. We anticipate that a substantial portion of our capital resources and efforts in the foreseeable future will be focused on completing the development of and seeking to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates. We do not expect to generate product revenue unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain marketing approval for at least one of our product candidates. We may also use a portion of our existing cash and cash equivalents for the potential acquisition of, or investment in, product candidates, technologies, formulations or companies that complement our business, although we have no current understandings, commitments or agreements to do so.
Previous wording
Our existing cash and cash equivalents of $4.8 million as of March 31, 2026 will not be sufficient to enable us to complete all necessary development of any potential product candidates and fund our operations for the next 12 months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are issued. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain further funding through one or more other public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaboration, strategic financing, grants or government contract awards, licensing arrangements or other sources. Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and potential disruptions to, and volatility in, financial markets in the United States and worldwide. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on acceptable terms, we may be required to defer, reduce or eliminate significant planned expenditures, restructure, curtail or eliminate some or all of our development programs or other operations, dispose of assets, enter into arrangements that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our product candidates, technologies or potential markets, file for bankruptcy or cease operations altogether. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a loss of investment by our stockholders.
Current wording
Our existing cash and cash equivalents of $24.0 million as of June 30, 2026 will not be sufficient to enable us to complete all necessary development of any potential product candidates and fund our operations for the next 12 months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are issued. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain further funding through one or more other public or private equity offerings, debt financings, collaboration, strategic financing, grants or government contract awards, licensing arrangements or other sources. Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening global economic conditions and potential disruptions to, and volatility in, financial markets in the United States and worldwide. Adequate additional funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on acceptable terms, we may be required to defer, reduce or eliminate significant planned expenditures, restructure, curtail or eliminate some or all of our development programs or other operations, dispose of assets, enter into arrangements that may require us to relinquish rights to certain of our product candidates, technologies or potential markets, file for bankruptcy or cease operations altogether. Any of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and result in a loss of investment by our stockholders.
Previous wording
Effective April 24, 2026, Daniel B. Gilmer, Ph.D. joined our Board of Directors. Dr. Gilmer brings 20 years of experience in healthcare commercialization, management consulting, and academic research. Most recently, Dr. Gilmer led an organization at Pfizer responsible for quality and promotional review across 50+ U.S. brands, working closely with medical, legal, and regulatory subject matter experts to advise commercial stakeholders on content quality, compliance, and risk-benefit balance. Previously, from April 2022 to February 2025, Dr. Gilmer led cross-functional teams in Pfizer’s Antiviral and Diagnostics Business, where he launched PAXLOVIDTM in the United States as it received New Drug Approval from the FDA. Earlier at Pfizer, from April 2021 to April 2022, Dr. Gilmer worked in Inflammation & Immunology Commercial Development, where he helped shape strategy for a portfolio of rheumatology and immunology assets. Dr. Gilmer joined Pfizer in Research & Development in May 2019, where he contributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine-enabling operating model and R&D portfolio strategy. Dr. Gilmer is an equal co-inventor on the patent for Exebacase (also termed “CF-301” or “PlySs2”), a first-in-classStaphylococcus bacteriophage endolysin. Exebacase received Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy designations from the FDA before advancing to Phase 3 clinical trials. Dr. Gilmer has authored multiple peer-reviewed publications on phage lysins and antimicrobial resistance. Prior to joining Pfizer, Dr. Gilmer worked at McKinsey & Co. focusing on commercial growth strategies, market access, and lean manufacturing in the United States, Canada, and France. Earlier in his career, he conducted microbiology and infectious disease research at leading academic institutions and the National Institutes of Health. He has a Ph.D. in Microbiology from Rockefeller University (“RU”) and a B.S. from Howard University. As an RU alum, he serves on both the RU Board of Trustees Educational Affairs Committee and the RU Ford Center Incubator selection committee. He is a member of the New York Academy of Sciences and a term member at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Current wording
Effective April 24, 2026, Daniel B. Gilmer, Ph.D. joined our Board of Directors. On June 24, 2026, the Board appointed Dr. Gilmer to serve on the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board. Dr. Gilmer brings 20 years of experience in healthcare commercialization, management consulting, and academic research. Most recently, Dr. Gilmer led an organization at Pfizer responsible for quality and promotional review across 50+ U.S. brands, working closely with medical, legal, and regulatory subject matter experts to advise commercial stakeholders on content quality, compliance, and risk-benefit balance. Previously, from April 2022 to February 2025, Dr. Gilmer led cross-functional teams in Pfizer’s Antiviral and Diagnostics Business, where he launched PAXLOVIDTM in the United States as it received New Drug Approval from the FDA. Earlier at Pfizer, from April 2021 to April 2022, Dr. Gilmer worked in Inflammation & Immunology Commercial Development, where he helped shape strategy for a portfolio of rheumatology and immunology assets. Dr. Gilmer joined Pfizer in Research & Development in May 2019, where he contributed to Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine-enabling operating model and R&D portfolio strategy. Dr. Gilmer is an equal co-inventor on the patent for Exebacase (also termed “CF-301” or “PlySs2”), a first-in-classStaphylococcus bacteriophage endolysin. Exebacase received Fast Track and Breakthrough Therapy designations from the FDA before advancing to Phase 3 clinical trials. Dr. Gilmer has authored multiple peer-reviewed publications on phage lysins and antimicrobial resistance. Prior to joining Pfizer, Dr. Gilmer worked at McKinsey & Co. focusing on commercial growth strategies, market access, and lean manufacturing in the United States, Canada, and France. Earlier in his career, he conducted microbiology and infectious disease research at leading academic institutions and the National Institutes of Health. He has a Ph.D. in Microbiology from Rockefeller University (“RU”) and a B.S. from Howard University. As an RU alum, he serves on both the RU Board of Trustees Educational Affairs Committee and the RU Ford Center Incubator selection committee. He is a member of the New York Academy of Sciences and a term member at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Previous wording
On January 23, 2026, we entered into amendments to the credit and security agreement, dated March 12, 2025 (the “March 2025 Credit Agreement”), the credit and security agreement, dated March 4, 2024 (the “2024 Credit Agreement”), the credit and security agreement, dated July 10, 2023 (the “2023 Credit Agreement”), and the secured convertible credit and security agreement, dated January 10, 2023 (the “Convertible Credit Agreement”) with Innoviva Strategic Opportunities LLC (“Innoviva Sub”), extending the maturity dates to June 1, 2027 (collectively, the “2026 Debt Amendments”). In exchange for the 2026 Debt Amendment, we also amended certain outstanding Innoviva Sub warrants to extend their expiration dates to January 26, 2031, and amended the related voting agreement to align with the revised warrant expiration date or FDA approval, as applicable. Refer to Note 7, “Convertible Loan” and Note 8, “Term Debt”, in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.
Current wording
On January 23, 2026, we entered into amendments to the credit and security agreement, dated March 12, 2025 (the “March 2025 Credit Agreement”), the credit and security agreement, dated March 4, 2024 (the “2024 Credit Agreement”), the credit and security agreement, dated July 10, 2023 (the “2023 Credit Agreement”), and the secured convertible credit and security agreement, dated January 10, 2023 (the “Convertible Credit Agreement”) with Innoviva Strategic Opportunities LLC (“Innoviva Sub”), extending the maturity dates to June 1, 2027 (collectively, the “2026 Debt Amendments”). In exchange for the 2026 Debt Amendments, we also amended certain outstanding Innoviva Sub warrants to extend their expiration dates to January 26, 2031, and amended the related voting agreement to align with the revised warrant expiration date or FDA approval, as applicable. Refer to Note 7, “Convertible Loan” and Note 8, “Term Debt”, in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.
Previous wording
On December 1, 2025, we entered into a Capital on Demand™ Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC (“Jones”), relating to the offer and sale of shares of its common stock. In accordance with the terms of the Sales Agreement, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 from time to time subject to certain conditions, through or to Jones, acting as agent or principal.
Current wording
On December 1, 2025, we entered into the 2025 ATM with JonesTrading Institutional Services LLC (“Jones”), relating to the at-the-market offering and sale of shares of our common stock. In accordance with the terms of the 2025 ATM, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 from time to time subject to certain conditions, through or to Jones, acting as agent or principal. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we issued 338,000 shares under the 2025 ATM for net proceeds of approximately $2.4 million, after deducting commissions and other issuance costs payable by us.
Previous wording
On August 11, 2025, we entered into a credit and security agreement (the “August 2025 Credit Agreement”) for a secured term loan facility in the aggregate amount of $15.0 million (the “August 2025 Loan”) with Innoviva. The August 2025 Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 14.0% and matures on January 11, 2029. Principal and accrued interest are payable at maturity. Repayment of the August 2025 Loan is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries, and the August 2025 Loan is secured by substantially all of our and the subsidiary guarantors’ assets.
Current wording
On August 11, 2025, we entered into a credit and security agreement (the “August 2025 Credit Agreement”) for a secured term loan facility in the aggregate amount of $15.0 million (the “August 2025 Loan”) with Innoviva Sub. The August 2025 Loan bears interest at an annual rate of 14.0% and matures on January 11, 2029. Principal and accrued interest are payable at maturity. Repayment of the August 2025 Loan is guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries, and the August 2025 Loan is secured by substantially all of our and the subsidiary guarantors’ assets.
Previous wording
On March 26, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was further modified to extend the term to September 30, 2026. We will continue to recognize additional grant and award revenue until the full amount of the amended award is utilized.
Current wording
On March 26, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was modified to extend the term to September 30, 2026. On June 22, 2026, the MTEC Agreement was modified to increase the total award by $2.5 million to $28.7 million. We will continue to recognize additional grant and award revenue until the full amount of the amended award is utilized.
Previous wording
Comparison of three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Current wording
Comparison of three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Previous wording
We recognized $0.8 million and $0.5 million of grant and award revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, which represents MTEC’s share of the costs incurred for our AP-SA02 program for the treatment of SAB.
Current wording
We recognized $2.5 million and $2.2 million of grant and award revenue during the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and $3.3 million and $2.7 million during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, which represents MTEC’s share of the costs incurred for our AP-SA02 program for the treatment of SAB.
Previous wording
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Current wording
The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):
Previous wording
Other external research and development costs increased by $0.3 million from $0.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $0.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase of lab supplies related to the end-of-Phase 2 FDA meeting and engineering runs.
Current wording
Other external research and development costs increased by $0.6 million from $0.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase in materials purchases for manufacturing runs.
Previous wording
Our expenses by product and by project for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (in thousands):
Current wording
Our expenses by product and by project for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were as follows (in thousands):
Previous wording
Personnel-related costs, including employee payroll and related expenses, increased by $0.3 million, from $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $2.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The increase was primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in incentive compensation, salaries and wages, and employee benefits and a $0.1 million increase in stock-based compensation.
Current wording
Personnel-related costs, including employee payroll and related expenses, increased by $1.6 million, from $4.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 to $6.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to a $1.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, mainly related to option grants issued after the second quarter of 2025, and a $0.2 million increase in other personnel-related costs including incentive compensation, salaries and wages, and employee benefits.
Previous wording
Facilities and overhead costs increased by $0.1 million, from $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase in lab equipment maintenance costs.
Current wording
Facilities and overhead costs increased by $0.4 million, from $2.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025 to $2.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026. The increase was primarily due to an increase in lab equipment maintenance costs.
Previous wording
General and administrative expenses were $3.5 million and $3.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase of $0.2 million is primarily related to an increase in stock-based compensation expense.
Current wording
General and administrative expenses were $5.2 million and $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase of $2.6 million is primarily related to an increase in stock-based compensation, mainly related to option grants issued after the second quarter of 2025, legal fees, and incentive compensation.
Previous wording
Interest income remained consistent at $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, and related to interest earned on our money market fund investments.
Current wording
Interest income was $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and $0.1 million and $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and related to interest earned on our money market fund investments.
Previous wording
We recognized interest expense of $5.6 million and $3.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 respectively. The increase is primarily related to increased debt balances as compared to the prior year period. Interest expense related to the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs for the secured term loan facility in an aggregate amount of $25.0 million pursuant to the 2023 Credit Agreement (the “2023 Loan”), the secured term loan facility in an aggregate amount of $35.0 million pursuant to the 2024 Credit Agreement (the “2024 Loan”), the secured term loan facility in an aggregate amount of $10.0 million pursuant to the March 2025 Credit Agreement (the “March 2025 Loan”) and August 2025 Loan. Stated interest is accrued and is payable at the maturity of the 2023 Loan, 2024 Loan and March 2025 Loan in June 2027, and the August 2025 Loan in January 2029.
Current wording
We recognized interest expense of $6.6 million and $3.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, and $12.2 million and $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase is primarily related to the issuance of $15.0 million of debt in August 2025 and $25.0 million of debt in May 2026, as well as the changes in effective interest rates of the 2023 Loan, 2024 Loan, and March 2025 Loan following the 2026 Debt Amendments. These changes were primarily attributable to (i) the extension of the maturity dates from March 12, 2026 to June 1, 2027, and (ii) the reallocation of the fair value of warrants held by the creditor (Innoviva Sub) as a result of the extension of their expiration dates. Stated interest is accrued and is payable at the maturity of the 2023 Loan, 2024 Loan and March 2025 Loan in June 2027, and the August 2025 Loan and May 2026 Loan in January 2029.
Previous wording
We recognized a loss of $101.1 million and gain of $5.2 million on the change in the fair value of the Convertible Loan for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Current wording
We recognized a gain of $91.0 million and loss of $5.8 million on the change in the fair value of the Convertible Loan for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We recognized a loss of $10.0 million and $0.5 million on the change in the fair value of the Convertible Loan for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Previous wording
The Convertible Loan received from Innoviva Sub in January 2023 and amended in July 2023, November 2024, March 2025, and January 2026 is accounted for at fair value using a weighted probability of various settlement scenarios of the Convertible Loan during its term discounted to each reporting date. Conversion option scenarios are valued using an option pricing model with significant assumptions and estimates such as volatility, expected term and risk-free interest rates. Changes in fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were primarily due to fluctuations of our stock price. Refer to Note 7, “Convertible Loan”, in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.
Current wording
The Convertible Loan received from Innoviva Sub in January 2023 and amended in July 2023, November 2024, March 2025, and January 2026 was accounted for at fair value.
Previous wording
We have incurred net losses since our inception and have negative operating cash flows. Our cash and cash equivalents of $4.8 million as of March 31, 2026 will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report are issued. We plan to control our expenses and to raise additional capital through a combination of public and private equity, debt financing, strategic alliances, and grant and award arrangements. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. While management believes this plan to raise additional funds will alleviate the conditions that raise substantial doubt, these plans are not entirely within our control and cannot be assessed as being probable of occurring. We may not be able to secure additional financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms, if at all.
Current wording
We have incurred net losses since our inception and have negative operating cash flows. Our cash and cash equivalents of $24.0 million as of June 30, 2026 will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next 12 months from the date the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report are issued. We plan to control our expenses and to raise additional capital through a combination of public and private equity, debt financing, strategic alliances, and grant and award arrangements. These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. While management believes this plan to raise additional funds will alleviate the conditions that raise substantial doubt, these plans are not entirely within our control and cannot be assessed as being probable of occurring. We may not be able to secure additional financing in a timely manner or on favorable terms, if at all.
Previous wording
On December 1, 2025, we entered into the Sales Agreement with Jones, relating to the offer and sale of shares of its common stock. In accordance with the terms of the Sales Agreement, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 from time to time subject to certain conditions, through or to Jones, acting as agent or principal.
Current wording
On December 1, 2025, we entered into the 2025 ATM with Jones, relating to the offer and sale of shares of our common stock. In accordance with the terms of the 2025 ATM, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $100,000,000 from time to time subject to certain conditions, through or to Jones, acting as agent or principal. During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we issued 338,000 shares under the 2025 ATM for net proceeds of approximately $2.4 million, after deducting commissions and other issuance costs payable by us.
Showing the first 40 of 48 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (3)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
We are combining our proprietary approach and expertise in identifying, characterizing and developing both naturally occurring and engineered bacteriophages with our proprietary phage-specific host-engineered cGMP manufacturing capabilities to advance a clinical pipeline of high-quality bacteriophage product candidates. We believe
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
During the year ended December 31, 2025, we estimated the fair value of our Convertible Loan using a weighted probability model of various debt settlement scenarios during the term discounted to the reporting date. Conversion option scenarios are valued using option pricing models with assumptions and estimates such as volatility, expected term, and risk-free interest rates.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Changes in fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were primarily due to fluctuations in our stock price. Refer to Note 7, “Convertible Loan”, in our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional details.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
placebo controlled clinical trials. We have combined our clinical data with rigorous and innovativein vitro science to extend our knowledge of phage biology enabling continued enhancement ofin vivo phage function.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
from the bacteremia studies, and with sufficient funding, we may in the future initiate a Phase 1b/2a trial to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous and intra-articular AP-SA02 as an adjunct to standard of care antibiotics in adults undergoing treatment of periprosthetic joint infections and/or wound infections caused byS. aureus.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
and liabilities was primarily due to an increase of $0.6 million in accrued compensation, a decrease of $0.4 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a decrease of $0.3 million in the operating lease liability, and an increase of $0.9 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets.