CYPHERPUNK TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Previous report

We have recently shifted a portion of our business strategy towards a focus on our digital asset treasury strategy, and we may be unable to successfully implement this new strategy.

Previous report

We have shifted a portion of our business strategy towards our digital asset treasury strategy, including potential investments in Zcash (ZEC). There is no assurance that we will be able to successfully implement this new strategy or operate ZEC-related activities at the scale or profitability currently anticipated. This strategic shift requires specialized employee skillsets and operational, technical and compliance infrastructure to support ZEC and related activities. This also requires that we implement different security protocols and treasury management practices. Further, there is ongoing scrutiny and limited formal guidance from regulatory agencies, including Nasdaq and the SEC, with respect to the treatment of public company digital asset treasury strategies. There is no assurance that we will be able to execute this strategy by building out the needed infrastructure within the timeframe that we currently anticipate. Errors by key management or our third party service providers could result in significant loss of funds and reduced rewards. As a result, our shift towards our digital asset treasury strategy could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Previous report

Our shift towards our digital asset treasury strategy requires substantial changes in our day-to-day operations and exposes us to significant operational risks.

Previous report

Our shift towards our digital asset treasury strategy exposes us to significant operational risks. The Zcash ecosystem is rapidly evolving, with frequent upgrades and protocol changes that may require significant adjustments to our operational setup. The Zcash upgrades and protocol changes may require that we incur unanticipated costs and could cause temporary service disruptions. We may also need to employ third-party service providers in our operations, which may introduce risks outside of our control, including significant cybersecurity risks. Any of these operational risks could materially and adversely affect our ability to execute our digital asset treasury strategy, prevent us from realizing positive returns and severely hurt our financial condition.

Previous report

ZEC is a highly volatile digital asset, and fluctuations in the price of ZEC may adversely influence our financial results and the market price of our listed securities.

Previous report

We plan to use a significant portion of capital in our treasury to purchase ZEC, a digital asset. The price of ZEC has been subject to dramatic price fluctuations and is highly volatile. In the twelve months ended November 7, 2025, ZEC has traded between approximately $26.14 and $736.51.

Previous report

Any increase or decrease in the fair value of ZEC will require us to recognize unrealized gains or losses, which could be material to our financial results for the applicable reporting period, which may create significant volatility in our reported earnings. Any decrease in reported earnings or increased volatility of such earnings could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our securities. In addition, the application of generally accepted accounting principles in the United States with respect to digital assets remains uncertain in some respects, and any future changes in the manner in which we account for our ZEC holdings could have a material adverse effect on our financial results and the market price of our securities.

Previous report

In addition, if investors view the value of our securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our ZEC holdings, the price of ZEC may significantly influence the market price of our securities. ZEC is a highly volatile asset. Our financial results and the market price of our listed securities would be adversely affected, and our business and financial condition would be negatively impacted, if the price of ZEC decreased substantially, including as a result of:

Previous report

In addition, the stock market and the markets for both digital asset-influenced and technology companies have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies in those markets. In particular, future trading prices in our securities may reflect market dynamics that are not connected to valuation methods commonly associated with operating companies in similar industries or with companies engaged predominantly in passive investments in digital assets or other commodities, such as exchange-traded products (“ETPs”). Equity market capitalizations of other such companies are often in excess of stockholders’ equity calculated in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and in excess of valuations that might traditionally be expected based on their operating performances, cash flows and net assets. Investors may therefore be unable to assess the value of our common stock or evaluate the risks of an investment in our company using traditional or commonly used enterprise valuation methods. We cannot predict how these dynamics may evolve over time, or whether or how long they may last. These market and industry factors may significantly harm the market price of our listed securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Previous report

The price of our listed securities has been and is likely to continue to be volatile, and with the adoption of our new digital asset treasury strategy, we expect to see additional volatility in our stock price. In addition, if investors view the value of our listed securities as dependent upon or linked to the value or change in the value of our ZEC holdings, the price of ZEC may significantly influence the market price of our listed securities. The price of ZEC has historically been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile.

Previous report

We have limited experience in investing in and managing the ownership of digital assets, and we rely on an affiliate of Winklevoss Capital, Gemini Space Sciences LLC, for the trading execution and custody of our ZEC, and we will not have direct control over our digital assets held through such custodian.

Previous report

We have limited experience in investing in and managing the ownership of digital assets, such as ZEC. We are reliant on an affiliate of Winklevoss Capital, Gemini Space Sciences LLC (“Gemini”), for the trading execution by which we acquire ZEC and to serve as the custodian for our ZEC on its regulated exchange and wallet storage system. As a result, our ZEC holdings will be concentrated with a single custodian, and we rely solely on its proprietary storage system and wallet infrastructure, security infrastructure, financial reporting, and software systems for our ZEC holdings. In Gemini’s structure to support trading, customer digital assets are pooled together, and Gemini relies on an internal customer ledger to maintain the segregated customer digital asset ownership. Gemini’s Omnibus Wallet Structure is made up of a set of online (i.e., “Hot”) and offline (e.g., “Cold”) wallets (or “storage tiers”), with Gemini responsible for managing the movement of digital assets between the online and offline storage tiers. While we have agreements governing Gemini’s activities relating to our account, we have limited influence over its actual performance.

Previous report

ZEC is controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public key and private key(s) relating to the local or online digital wallet in which ZEC is held. While the Zcash blockchain ledger requires a public key relating to a digital wallet to be published when used in a transaction, private keys must be safeguarded and kept private in order to prevent a third party from accessing ZEC held in such wallet. To the extent the private key(s) for a digital wallet are lost, destroyed, or otherwise compromised and no backup of the private key(s) is accessible, neither we nor our custodians will be able to access ZEC held in the related digital wallet.

Previous report

Furthermore, we cannot provide assurance that the digital wallets at Gemini will not be compromised as a result of a cyberattack. ZEC and the Zcash blockchain ledger, as well as other digital assets and blockchain technologies, have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. The failure of Gemini to successfully carry out its contractual duties, trading instructions, safeguard our ZEC, or maintain its internal systems and processes could have a material adverse effect on our ZEC holdings, digital asset treasury strategy, financial condition, and business operations.

Previous report

Moreover, our agreements with Gemini might terminate for a variety of reasons, and if we need to enter into alternative custody arrangements, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative custodians or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional custodians for digital assets involves additional cost, custody risk, and requires management time and focus. While we will conduct due diligence on our custodians and any exchanges or platforms we may use, there can be no assurance that such diligence will uncover all risks, including operational deficiencies, hidden vulnerabilities or legal noncompliance. In addition, there is risk during any transition period when a new custodian would commence services to safeguard our ownership of our digital assets. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter challenges in the custody of our digital assets and that those challenges will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and prospects, and results of operations.

Previous report

Additionally, our use of custodians, such as Gemini, exposes us to the risk that the ZEC that the custodian holds on our behalf could be subject to bankruptcy, receivership or similar insolvency proceedings, and we could be treated as a general unsecured creditor of the custodian, inhibiting our ability to exercise ownership rights with respect to such ZEC. A series of recent high-profile bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions and other events relating to companies operating in the digital asset industry, the closure or liquidation of certain financial institutions that provided lending and other services to the digital assets industry, and the filing and subsequent settlement of a civil fraud lawsuit have highlighted the counterparty risks applicable to owning and transacting in digital assets. These bankruptcies, closures, liquidations and other events have likely negatively impacted the adoption rate and use of digital assets. Additional bankruptcies, closures, liquidations, regulatory enforcement actions or other events involving participants in the digital assets industry in the future may further negatively impact the adoption rate, price, and use of digital assets, limit the availability to us of financing collateralized by such assets, or create or expose additional counterparty risks. Any loss associated with such bankruptcy, receivership or similar insolvency proceedings is unlikely to be covered by any insurance coverage we may maintain related to our ZEC. Even if we are able to prevent our digital assets from being considered the property of a custodian’s bankruptcy estate as part of an insolvency proceeding, it is possible that we would still be delayed or may otherwise experience difficulty in accessing our digital assets held by the affected custodian during the pendency of the insolvency proceedings. Any such outcome could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the market price of our listed securities. The legal framework governing digital asset ownership and rights in custodial or insolvency contexts remains uncertain and continues to evolve, which could result in unexpected losses, protracted recovery processes or adverse treatment in insolvency proceedings.

Previous report

Any insurance that may cover losses of our ZEC holdings may cover none or only a small fraction of the value of the entirety of our ZEC holdings, and there can be no guarantee that such insurance will be maintained as part of the custodial services we have or that such coverage will cover losses with respect to our ZEC.

Previous report

Because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions, we may inadvertently and without knowledge, directly or indirectly, engage in transactions with or for the benefit of prohibited persons under U.S. or foreign sanctions laws.

Previous report

We are subject to the rules enforced by the Office of Foreign Asset Control (“OFAC”), including prohibitions on conducting direct or indirect business with persons named on, or owned by persons named on, OFAC’s various sanctions lists, including the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons list. We are also prohibited from direct or indirect dealings with persons located in, organized in, or nationals of, jurisdictions subject to U.S. embargos, and may be prohibited from dealing with persons in other jurisdictions subject to targeted U.S. sanctions. U.S. sanctions compliance obligations apply to transactions in digital assets and U.S. sanctions authorities have in recent years directed significant attention to sanctions compliance in the digital asset industry. Because of the pseudonymous nature of blockchain transactions and decentralized applications, we may inadvertently and without knowledge, directly or indirectly, engage in transactions with or for the benefit of prohibited persons. Civil liability for OFAC sanctions violations is typically regarded as “strict liability” violations, meaning we may be held responsible for transacting with prohibited parties even if we have no knowledge that a particular counterparty is a prohibited person under the OFAC sanctions regulations. In addition, we may be subject to non-U.S. economic sanctions laws and regulations to the extent we conduct activity within the jurisdiction of other sanctions regimes, including those of the European Union and United Kingdom.

Previous report

OFAC and other governmental authorities have significant discretion in the interpretation and enforcement of sanctions laws and regulations. Moreover, economic sanctions laws and regulations continue to evolve, often with little or no notice, which could raise operational or compliance challenges. If it is determined that we have transacted with prohibited persons, even inadvertently, this could result in substantial reputational harm, fines or penalties, and costs associated with governmental inquiries and investigations. Any or all of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, operations or financial condition.

Previous report

The cryptography used to enhance the privacy of transactions on the Zcash network is new and could ultimately fail, or could be used to facilitate illicit activities, and businesses that facilitate transactions in ZEC may be at increased risk of criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having services cut off, which could negatively affect the price of ZEC and the value of our listed securities.

Previous report

The Zcash network uses zk-SNARKs, which provide additional layers of confidentiality to transactions on the Zcash network by protecting the amount and the recipient in ZEC transactions. This cryptography is new and could ultimately fail, resulting in less privacy than believed or no privacy at all, and could adversely affect one’s ability to complete transactions on any such digital asset network or otherwise adversely interfere with the integrity of the relevant blockchain. Digital asset networks have in the past been, and may continue to be, used to facilitate illicit activities. Because ZEC is a privacy-preserving digital asset, it is also subject to certain types of attacks that may go undetected. For example, on February 5, 2019, the team behind ZEC announced that it discovered a vulnerability in its zk-SNARK implementation on March 1, 2018 that was subsequently patched in connection with a network upgrade called “Sapling” in October 2018.

Previous report

Moreover, law enforcement agencies and other market participants have often relied on the transparency of blockchains to facilitate investigations and comply with laws, such as anti-money laundering and economic sanctions laws. Because of the privacy-enhancing features of the Zcash network, law enforcement agencies and other market participants may have less visibility into transaction-level data, which may encourage bad actors to misuse the Zcash network for such illicit purposes. As a result, businesses that facilitate transactions in ZEC may be at increased risk of potential criminal or civil lawsuits, or of having banking or other services cut off if there is a concern that these features interfere with the performance of anti-money laundering duties and economic sanctions checks. Since 2019, ZEC, along with several other privacy tokens including Monero, Dash, and Horizen have been delisted from multiple exchanges. Although these digital asset trading platforms did not disclose the reasons for such delisting, and some digital asset trading platforms subsequently relisted ZEC, it is believed that they were the result of the privacy-enhancing features of the digital assets, and there is a risk that other digital asset trading platforms may remove ZEC from their platforms as a result of these concerns. Other service providers of such businesses may also cut off services if there is a concern that the Zcash network is being used to facilitate crime. Any of the aforementioned occurrences could increase regulatory scrutiny of the Zcash network and/or adversely affect the price of ZEC, the attractiveness of the Zcash network and an investment in our listed securities.

Previous report

If we, Gemini or our respective third-party service providers experience a security breach or cyberattack and unauthorized parties obtain access to our ZEC, or if our access to our wallets holding ZEC is lost or destroyed, or other similar circumstances or events occur, we may lose some or all of our ZEC and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Previous report

We expect that substantially all of the ZEC we acquire will be held in custody accounts at Gemini. Security breaches and cyberattacks are of particular concern with respect to digital assets, including ZEC. ZEC and other blockchain-based digital assets and the entities that provide services to participants in the Zcash ecosystem have been, and may in the future be, subject to security breaches, cyberattacks, or other malicious activities. For example, in October 2021, it was reported that hackers exploited a flaw in the account recovery process and stole from the accounts of at least 6,000 customers of the Coinbase exchange, although the flaw was subsequently fixed and Coinbase reimbursed affected customers. Similarly, in November 2022, hackers exploited weaknesses in the security architecture of the FTX Trading digital asset exchange and reportedly stole over $400 million in digital assets from customers.

Previous report

A successful security breach or cyberattack could result in:

Previous report

Further, any actual or perceived data security breach or cybersecurity attack directed at other companies with digital assets or companies that operate in the digital asset ecosystem, regardless of whether we are directly impacted, could lead to a general loss of

Previous report

confidence in the broader Zcash ecosystem or in the use of the Zcash network to conduct financial transactions, which could negatively impact us.

Previous report

Attacks upon systems across a variety of industries, including industries related to digital assets such as Zcash, are increasing in frequency, persistence and sophistication and, in many cases, are being conducted by sophisticated, well-funded and organized groups and individuals, including state actors. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized, improper or illegal access to systems and information (including personal data and digital assets), disable or degrade services, or sabotage systems are constantly evolving, may be difficult to detect quickly and often are not recognized or detected until after they have been launched against a target. These attacks may occur on our systems or those of our third-party service providers or partners. We may experience breaches of our security measures due to human error, malfeasance, insider threats, system errors or vulnerabilities or other irregularities. In particular, we expect that unauthorized parties will attempt to gain access to our systems and facilities, as well as those of our partners and third-party service providers, through various means, such as hacking, social engineering, phishing and fraud. Threats can come from a variety of sources, including criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage and insiders. In addition, certain types of attacks could harm us even if our systems are left undisturbed. For example, certain threats are designed to remain dormant or undetectable, sometimes for extended periods of time, or until launched against a target and we may not be able to implement adequate preventative measures. Further, there has been an increase in such activities due to the increase in work-from-home arrangements. The risk of cyberattacks could also be increased by cyberwarfare in connection with the ongoing Russia-Ukraine and Israel-Hamas conflicts, or other future conflicts, including potential proliferation of malware into systems unrelated to such conflicts. Any future breach of our operations or those of others in the Zcash ecosystem, including third-party services on which we rely, could materially and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Previous report

A disruption of the Internet may affect the operation of the blockchain networks, which may adversely affect the digital asset industry and an investment in the Company.

Previous report

Blockchain networks rely on the Internet. A significant disruption of Internet connectivity could disrupt blockchain networks’ functionality until such disruption is resolved. A disruption in the Internet could adversely affect an investment in the Company. In particular, some variants of digital assets have experienced a number of denial-of-service attacks, which have led to temporary delays in block creation and digital asset transfers.

Previous report

Digital assets are also susceptible to border gateway protocol hijacking (“BGP hijacking”). Such an attack can be a very effective way for an attacker to intercept traffic in route to a legitimate destination. BGP hijacking impacts the way different nodes and miners are connected to one another to isolate portions of them from the remainder of the network, which could lead to a risk of the network allowing double-spending and other security issues. If BGP hijacking occurs on any blockchain network, participants may lose faith in the security of digital assets, which could affect digital asset value and consequently the value of our common stock.

Previous report

Any Internet failures or Internet connectivity-related attacks that impact the ability to transfer ZEC could have a material adverse effect on the price of ZEC and the value of an investment in our company.

Previous report

The irreversibility of digital asset transactions exposes us to risks of theft, loss and human error, which could negatively impact our business.

Previous report

Digital asset transactions are not, from an administrative perspective, reversible without the consent and active participation of the recipient of the transaction or, in theory, control or consent of a majority of the processing power on that digital asset network. Once a transaction has been verified and recorded in a block that is added to the blockchain, an incorrect transfer of digital assets or a theft of digital assets generally will not be reversible, and we may not be capable of seeking compensation for any such transfer or theft.

Previous report

Although we plan to regularly transfer digital assets to or from vendors, consultants and service providers, it is possible that, through computer or human error, or through theft or criminal action, such assets could be transferred in incorrect amounts or to unauthorized third parties.

Previous report

To the extent we are unable to seek a corrective transaction to identify the third party which has received our digital assets through error or theft, we will be unable to revert or otherwise recover the impacted digital assets, and any such loss could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous report

We face significant risks relating to disruptions, forks, 51% attacks, hacks, network disruptions, or other adverse events or other compromises to blockchain networks, which could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Previous report

Blockchain networks are maintained by decentralized networks of participants, and as such are susceptible and vulnerable to a variety of risks, including disruptions, security breaches, and fundamental technical issues. Blockchain networks are vulnerable to attacks by malicious actors who gain control of a significant portion of the network’s mining hash rate, a scenario commonly referred to as a 51% attack. In such an event, the attacker could double-spend transactions, reverse previously confirmed transactions, or otherwise disrupt the normal operations of the network. Successful 51% attacks have historically undermined trust in affected blockchain networks and could materially decrease the value of digital assets.

Previous report

Additionally, forks, or splits in the underlying protocol may occur when participants fail to reach consensus on proposed upgrades or changes. Forks can lead to the creation of duplicate networks, confusion among market participants, dilution of the original network’s value and disruption of the network’s operations. Hard forks, in particular, can materially and adversely impact the perceived stability and value of digital assets, leading to reduced demand and price declines.