SAGA COMMUNICATIONS INC

Previous wording

We use certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) to assess our financial performance. For example, we evaluate the performance of our markets based on “station operating income” (operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, other operating (income) expenses, and impairment of intangible assets). Station operating income is generally recognized by the broadcasting industry as a measure of performance, is used by analysts who report on the performance of the broadcasting industry, and it serves as an indicator of the market value of a group of stations. In addition, we use it to evaluate individual stations, market-level performance, overall operations and as a primary measure for incentive based compensation of executives and other members of management. Station operating income is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available to us for debt service requirements, other commitments, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. Station operating income is not a measure of liquidity or of performance in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, our results of operations presented on a GAAP basis.

Current wording

We use certain financial measures that are not calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) to assess our financial performance. For example, we evaluate the performance of our markets based on “station operating income” (operating income plus corporate general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, other operating (income) expenses, impairment of intangible assets and impairment of goodwill) and use “same station” financial information when analyzing year over year variances. Station operating income is generally recognized by the broadcasting industry as a measure of performance, is used by analysts who report on the performance of the broadcasting industry, and it serves as an indicator of the market value of a group of stations. In addition, we use it to evaluate individual stations, market-level performance, overall operations and as a primary measure for incentive-based compensation of executives and other members of management. Station operating income is not necessarily indicative of amounts that may be available to us for debt service requirements, other commitments, reinvestment or other discretionary uses. Station operating income is not a measure of liquidity or of performance in accordance with GAAP, and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, our results of operations presented on a GAAP basis. Same station financial information excludes stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period.

Previous wording

We are a media company primarily engaged in acquiring, developing and operating broadcast properties including opportunities complimentary to our core radio business including digital, e-commerce and non-traditional revenue initiatives. We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. We review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis.

Current wording

We are a media company primarily engaged in acquiring, developing and operating broadcast properties including opportunities complementary to our core radio business including digital, e-commerce and non-traditional revenue initiatives. We actively seek and explore opportunities for expansion through the acquisition of additional broadcast properties. We review acquisition opportunities on an ongoing basis.

Previous wording

Most advertising contracts are short-term and generally run for a few weeks only. The majority of our revenue is generated from local advertising, which is sold primarily by each radio market’s sales staff. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, approximately 88% and 90%, respectively, of our radio stations’ gross revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage independent advertising sales representative firms that specialize in national sales for each of our broadcast markets.

Current wording

Most advertising contracts are short-term and generally run for a few weeks only. The majority of our revenue is generated from local advertising, which is sold primarily by each radio market’s sales staff. For the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, approximately 91% and 88%, respectively, of our radio stations’ gross revenue was from local advertising. To generate national advertising sales, we engage independent advertising sales representative firms that specialize in national sales for each of our broadcast markets.

Previous wording

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year. Political revenue was significantly higher in 2024 due to the increased number of national, state, and local elections in most of our markets as compared to 2023. Our gross political revenue for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $3,263,000 and $944,000, respectively. We expect political revenue in 2025 to decrease from 2024 levels as a result of less elections in 2025 at the local, state and national levels.

Current wording

Our revenue varies throughout the year. Advertising expenditures, our primary source of revenue, generally have been lowest during the winter months, which include the first quarter of each year. Political revenue was significantly lower in 2025 due to the decreased number of national, state, and local elections in most of our markets as compared to 2024. Our gross political revenue for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 was $650,000 and $3,263,000, respectively. We expect political revenue in 2026 to increase from 2025 levels as a result of more elections in 2026 at the local, state and national levels.

Previous wording

When we acquire and/or begin to operate a station or group of stations we generally increase programming and advertising and promotion expenses to increase our share of our target demographic audience. Our strategy sometimes requires levels of spending commensurate with the revenue levels we plan on achieving in two to five years. During periods of economic downturns, or when the level of advertising spending is flat or down across the industry, this strategy may result in the appearance that our cost of operations are increasing at a faster rate than our growth in revenues, until such time as we achieve our targeted levels of revenue for the acquired station or group of stations.

Current wording

When we acquire and/or begin to operate a station or group of stations we generally increase programming and advertising and promotion expenses to increase our share of our target demographic audience. Our strategy sometimes requires levels of spending commensurate with the revenue levels we plan on achieving in two to four years. During periods of economic downturns, or when the level of advertising spending is flat or down across the industry, this strategy may result in the appearance that our cost of operations are increasing at a faster rate than our growth in revenues, until such time as we achieve our targeted levels of revenue for the acquired station or group of stations.

Previous wording

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, our Charleston, South Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Des Moines, Iowa; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; and Norfolk, Virginia markets, when combined, represented approximately 36% and 37%, respectively, of our consolidated net operating revenue. An adverse change in any of these radio markets or relative market position in those markets could have a significant impact on our operating results as a whole.

Current wording

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, our Charleston, South Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Norfolk, Virginia; and Portland, Maine markets, when combined, represented approximately 34% and 36%, respectively, of our consolidated net operating revenue. An adverse change in any of these radio markets or relative market position in those markets could have a significant impact on our operating results as a whole.

Previous wording

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the radio stations in our five largest markets when combined, represented approximately 37% and 40%, respectively, of our consolidated station operating income. The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated station operating income represented by each of these markets:

Current wording

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, the radio stations in our five largest markets when combined, represented approximately 39% and 40%, respectively, of our consolidated station operating income (loss). The following tables describe the percentage of our consolidated station operating income (loss) represented by each of these markets:

Previous wording

For the year ended December 31, 2024, consolidated net operating revenue was $112,919,000 compared with $115,504,000 for the year ended December 31,2023, a decrease of $2,585,000 or 2.2%. We had an increase of approximately $1,760,000 that was attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period, offset by a decrease of $4,345,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2023 (“same station”). The decrease in same station revenue in 2024 was due to decreases in gross local revenues of $8,868,000 partially offset by increases in gross political revenue of $2,308,000 and gross interactive or digital revenue of $1,745,000 and a decrease in agency commission of $439,000 from 2023. The most significant decreases in gross local revenue occurred in our Clarksville, Tennessee; Columbus, Ohio; Des Moines, Iowa; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin; markets partially offset by increases at our Asheville, North Carolina and Charlottesville, Virginia. The decrease in our agency commissions is due to the decrease in local agency revenue. The gross political revenue increased due to an increase in the number of national, state and local elections. The increase in gross interactive results is primarily due to an increase in our streaming and website advertising revenue.

Current wording

For the year ended December 31, 2025, consolidated net operating revenue was $107,112,000 compared with $112,919,000 for the year ended December 31,2024, a decrease of $5,807,000 or 5.1%. We had an increase of approximately $725,000 that was attributable to stations that we did not own or operate for the entire comparable period, offset by a decrease of $6,532,000 generated by stations we owned or operated for the comparable period in 2024 (“same station”). The decrease in same station revenue in 2025 was due to decreases in gross local revenues of $5,202,000, gross political revenue of $2,613,000, gross national revenue of $1,741,000 and gross non-spot revenue of $235,000 partially offset by increases in gross interactive or digital revenue of $2,603,000 and a decrease in agency commission of $985,000 from 2024. The most significant decreases in gross local revenue occurred in our Columbus, Ohio; Des Moines, Iowa; Ithaca, New York; Jonesboro, Arkansas; Keene, New Hampshire/Brattleboro, Vermont; and Norfolk, Virginia markets partially offset by an increase at our Asheville, North Carolina market. The gross political revenue decreased due to a decrease in the number of national, state and local elections. The decrease in gross national revenue is primarily due to decreases in our Charleston, South Carolina; Columbus, Ohio; Manchester, New Hampshire; Ocala, Florida; and Portland Maine, partially offset by an increase in our Norfolk, Virginia market. The increase in gross digital revenue is primarily due to an increase in our streaming, website advertising, search engine management (“SEM”) and targeted display revenue. The decrease in our agency commissions is due to the decrease in local agency revenue.

Previous wording

We generated net income of $3,460,000 ($0.55 per share on a fully diluted basis) during the year ended December 31, 2024, compared to $9,500,000 ($1.55 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31,2023, a decrease of $6,040,000. The decrease in net income is due to the decrease of operating income, described above, an increase in interest expense of $175,000, and a decrease in interest income of $394,000 partially offset by an increase in other income of $1,397,000 and a decrease in income taxes of $2,265,000. The increase in interest expense is due to an increase in debt outstanding. The decrease in interest income is related to the decrease in the amount of short-term investment accounts. The increase in other income is due to the $1,133,000 received related to the sale of an investment in BMI and $384,000 in insurance proceeds received as a result of weather-related damages. The gain on sale of investment and gain on insurance claims are recorded in other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income. The decrease in our income tax expense is due to lower income before income tax expense for the comparable period.

Current wording

We generated a net loss of $7,899,000 ($1.22 per share on a fully diluted basis) during the year ended December 31, 2025, compared to net income $3,460,000 ($0.55 per share on a fully diluted basis) for the year ended December 31,2024, a decrease of $11,359,000. The decrease in net income is due to the decrease of operating income, resulting primarily from the non-cash impairment charges described above. We also experienced an increase in interest expense of $86,000, a decrease in interest income of $143,000, a decrease in other income of $1,411,000 which were partially offset by a decrease in income taxes of $3,680,000. The increase in interest expense is due to an increase in debt outstanding. The decrease in interest income is related to the decrease in the amount of short-term investment accounts. The other income in 2025 of $105,000 is related to insurance proceeds and in 2024 it is related to $1,133,000 received related to the sale of an investment in BMI and $383,000 in insurance proceeds. The gain on gain on insurance claims are recorded in other (income) expense, net in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss). The decrease in our income tax expense is due to the net loss before income tax benefit compared to the net income before income tax expense for the comparable period.

Previous wording

On December 19, 2022, we entered into a Third Amendment to our Credit Facility, (the “Third Amendment”), which extended the maturity date to December 19, 2027, reduced the lenders to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and the Huntington National Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), established an interest rate equal to the secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) as administered by the SOFR Administrator (currently established as the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) as the interest base and increased the basis points.

Current wording

In connection with the Sale-Leaseback Transaction described in Note 16 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company entered into a Fourth Amendment (“Fourth Amendment”) to its Credit Agreement, dated as of August 18, 2015 and amended on September 1, 2017, June 17, 2018, and December 19, 2022, between the Company, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Huntington National Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., in its capacity as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (“Agent”), (i) reducing the aggregate amount of the Lender’s revolving commitments from $50,000,000 to $40,000,000, and (ii) releasing the Agent’s security interest in the GTC Assets, but not any proceeds paid for the GTC Assets or any other collateral. Previously, on December 19, 2022, we entered into a Third Amendment to our Credit Facility, (the “Third Amendment”), which extended the maturity date to December 19, 2027, reduced the lenders to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and the Huntington National Bank (collectively, the “Lenders”), established an interest rate equal to the secured overnight financing rate (“SOFR”) as administered by the SOFR Administrator (currently established as the Federal Reserve Bank of New York) as the interest base and increased the basis points.

Previous wording

Interest rates under the Credit Facility are payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to SOFR (4.49% at December 31,2024), plus 1% to 2% or the base rate plus 0% to 1%. The spread over SOFR and the base rate vary from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility will be subject to a participation fee (which is equal to the interest rate applicable to Eurocurrency Loans, as defined in the Credit Agreement) payable to each of the Lenders and a fronting fee equal to 0.25% per annum payable to the issuing bank. Under the Third Amendment, we now pay quarterly commitment fees of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Facility. We previously paid quarterly commitment fees of 0.2% to 0.3% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.

Current wording

Interest rates under the Credit Facility are payable, at our option, at alternatives equal to SOFR (3.87% at December 31,2025), plus 1% to 2% or the base rate plus 0% to 1%. The spread over SOFR and the base rate vary from time to time, depending upon our financial leverage. Letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility will be subject to a participation fee (which is equal to the interest rate applicable to Eurocurrency Loans, as defined in the Credit Agreement) payable to each of the Lenders and a fronting fee equal to 0.25% per annum payable to the issuing bank. Under the Third Amendment, we now pay quarterly commitment fees of 0.25% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Facility. We previously paid quarterly commitment fees of 0.2% to 0.3% per annum on the unused portion of the Credit Facility.

Previous wording

We had $5,000,000 debt outstanding at December 31, 2024 and no debt outstanding at December 31, 2023.

Current wording

We had $5,000,000 debt outstanding at December 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 that we borrowed in conjunction with our Lafayette acquisition.

Previous wording

We had approximately $45 million and $50 million unused borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Current wording

We had approximately $35 million and $45 million unused borrowing capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Previous wording

During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had net cash flows from operating activities of $13,772,000 and $15,379,000, respectively. We believe that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet any quarterly debt service requirements for interest and scheduled payments of principal under the Credit Facility if we borrow in the future. However, if such cash flow is not sufficient, we may be required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our obligations or dispose of one or more of our properties in order to make such scheduled payments. There can be no assurance that we would be able to effect any such transactions on favorable terms, if at all.

Current wording

During the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, we had net cash flows from operating activities of $5,464,000 and $13,772,000, respectively. We believe that cash flow from operations will be sufficient to meet any quarterly debt service requirements for interest and scheduled payments of principal under the Credit Facility if we borrow in the future. However, if such cash flow is not sufficient, we may be required to sell additional equity securities, refinance our obligations or dispose of one or more of our properties in order to make such scheduled payments. There can be no assurance that we would be able to effect any such transactions on favorable terms, if at all.

Previous wording

In February 2013, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to our Stock Buy-Back Program (the “Buy-Back Program”) to allow us to purchase up to $75.8 million of our Class A Common Stock. From the Buy-Back Program’s inception in 1998 through December 31, 2024, we have repurchased 2.2 million shares of our Class A Common Stock for $58.1 million. During the year ended December 31, 2024, approximately 21,865 shares were retained for payment of withholding taxes for $290,344 related to the vesting of restricted stock. We halted the directions for any additional buybacks under our plan in 2020. We continue to monitor economic conditions to determine if and when it makes sense to make additional buybacks under our plan.

Current wording

In March 2013, our Board of Directors authorized an increase to our Stock Buy-Back Program (the “Buy-Back Program”) to allow us to purchase up to $75.8 million of our Class A Common Stock. From the Buy-Back Program’s inception in 1998 through December 31, 2025, we have repurchased 2.4 million shares of our Class A Common Stock for $60.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately 184,000 shares were repurchased for $2,100,000 under privately negotiated transactions and approximately 35,000 shares were retained for payment of withholding taxes for $400,000 related to the vesting of restricted stock. We continue to monitor economic conditions to determine if and when it makes sense to make additional buybacks under our plan.

Previous wording

Our capital expenditures, exclusive of acquisitions, for the year ended December 31, 2024 were $3,767,000 ($4,356,000 in 2023). We anticipate capital expenditures in 2025 to be approximately $4.0 million to $4.5 million, which we expect to finance through funds generated from operations.

Current wording

Our capital expenditures, exclusive of acquisitions, for the year ended December 31, 2025 were $3,041,000 ($3,767,000 in 2024). We anticipate capital expenditures in 2026 to be approximately $3.5 million to $4.5 million, which we expect to finance through funds generated from operations.

Previous wording

During 2023, the Company’s Board of Directors declared four quarterly cash dividends and one special dividend on its Class A Common Stock. These dividends, totaling $3.00 per share and approximately $18.6 million were accrued or paid during 2023.

Current wording

During 2025, the Company’s Board of Directors declared four quarterly cash dividends on its Class A Common Stock. These dividends, totaling $1.00 per share and approximately $6.4 million were paid during 2025.

Previous wording

During 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors has declared four quarterly cash dividends and a variable dividend on its Class A Common Stock. These dividends, totaling $1.60 per share and approximately $10.0 million were paid during 2024.

Current wording

During 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors declared four quarterly cash dividends and a variable dividend on its Class A Common Stock. These dividends, totaling $1.60 per share and approximately $10.0 million were paid during 2024.

Previous wording

During 2024, we used the proceeds from our U.S. Treasury Bills to purchase additional U.S. Treasury Bills when they were up for redemption at various times through the year. We redeemed $21.7 million in U.S. Treasury Bills and purchased an additional $19.7 million in U.S. Treasury Bills. At December 2024, we have recorded $8.9 million of held-to-maturity U.S. Treasury Bills at amortized cost basis that have a fair market value of $8.9 million. Our held-to-maturity U.S. Treasury Bills all have original maturity dates ranging from March 2025 to June 2025.

Current wording

During 2025, we used the proceeds from our U.S. Treasury Bills to purchase additional U.S. Treasury Bills when they were up for redemption at various times through the year. We redeemed $18.2 million in U.S. Treasury Bills and purchased an additional $18.2 million in U.S. Treasury Bills. At December 2025, we have recorded $9.3 million of

Previous wording

Broadcast Licenses and Goodwill: As of December 31,2024, we have recorded approximately $91,497,000 in broadcast licenses and $19,229,000 in goodwill, which represents 50% of our total assets. In assessing the recoverability of these assets, we must conduct impairment testing and charge to operations an impairment expense only in the periods in which the carrying value of these assets is more than their fair value. We conduct the impairment testing of broadcast licenses and goodwill annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired.

Current wording

Broadcast Licenses and Goodwill: As of December 31,2025, we have recorded approximately $90,311,000 in broadcast licenses, which represents 45% of our total assets. In assessing the recoverability of these assets, we must conduct impairment testing and charge to operations an impairment expense only in the periods in which the carrying value of these assets is more than their fair value. We conduct the impairment testing of broadcast licenses and goodwill annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we recorded an impairment loss of $20,397,000 for broadcast licenses and goodwill. There was no impairment of broadcast licenses or goodwill in 2024.

Previous wording

We believe our estimate of the value of our broadcast licenses is a critical accounting estimate as the value is significant in relation to our total assets, and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance of our stations. These variables include but are not limited to: (1) the forecast growth rate of each radio market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6)terminal values. Changes in our estimates of the fair value of these assets could result in material future period write-downs in the carrying value of our broadcast licenses. For illustrative purposes only, during our 2024 impairment test had the fair values of each of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 10% we would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $108,000; had the fair values of each of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 20%, we would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $335,000; and had the fair value of our broadcasting licenses been lower by 30%, we would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $714,000.

Current wording

We believe our estimate of the value of our broadcast licenses is a critical accounting estimate as the value is significant in relation to our total assets, and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance of our stations. These variables include but are not limited to: (1) the forecast growth rate of each radio market, including population, household income, retail sales and other expenditures that would influence advertising expenditures; (2) market share and profit margin of an average station within a market; (3) estimated capital start-up costs and losses incurred during the early years; (4) risk-adjusted discount rate; (5) the likely media competition within the market area; and (6) terminal values. Changes in our estimates of the fair value of these assets could result in material future period write-downs in the carrying value of our broadcast licenses. As a result of our annual broadcast license impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2025, we noted that the fair value exceeded the carrying value of our broadcast license in Ithaca, New York, resulting in a $1.2 million non-cash impairment charge. For illustrative purposes only, during our 2025 impairment test had the discount rate of our broadcasting licenses that had been quantitatively tested been higher by 0.5% we would have recorded an additional broadcast license impairment of approximately $670,000.

Previous wording

Additionally, our estimate of the value of our goodwill is a critical accounting estimate and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance. We believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the estimated fair value of our goodwill, however, these estimates and assumptions are highly judgmental in nature. Our estimated fair value of our goodwill exceeds our carrying value by 22%. Actual results can be materially different from estimate and assumptions. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by the industry or by us, of if events occur or circumstances changes that would reduce the estimated fair value of our goodwill below the carrying value, we may recognize future impairment charges, the amount of which may be material. For illustrative purposes only, if the discount rate increased by 1.0%, the estimated fair value of our goodwill would only exceed our carrying value by 13%.

Current wording

Additionally, our estimate of the value of our goodwill is a critical accounting estimate and our estimate of the value uses assumptions that incorporate variables based on past experiences and judgments about future operating performance. As part of our annual goodwill impairment test in the fourth quarter of 2025, which indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit was below its carrying value, we have reduced our goodwill to zero, resulting in a $19.2 million non-cash impairment charge. The impairment was driven by lower than expected revenue growth seen in the fourth quarter of 2025 for our radio advertising revenue and the radio industry as a whole which resulted in less than favorable market projections and operating profit margins used in our annual impairment calculation performed in the fourth quarter. We believe we have made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the estimated fair value of our goodwill, however, these estimates and assumptions are highly judgmental in nature. Actual results can be

Previous wording

Tax Provisions: Our estimates of income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred tax assets and liabilities are shown in the notes to our consolidated financial statements and reflect our assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and probability of these estimates. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law or results from the final review of our tax returns by federal, state or foreign tax authorities. We use our judgment to determine whether it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation

Current wording

Tax Provisions: Our estimates of income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred tax assets and liabilities are shown in the notes to our consolidated financial statements and reflect our assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and probability of these estimates. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law or results from the final review of our tax returns by federal, state or foreign tax authorities. We use our judgment to determine whether it is more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets are reduced by valuation allowances if the Company believes it is more than likely than not that some portion or the entire asset will not be realized.