United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
For the period ended May 19, 2026. Filed Apr 7, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
May 19, 2026 · Filed Apr 7, 2026
Contents
2025 Compensation Program Design
2025 Executive Compensation Overview
The following table provides information regarding the elements of our fiscal year 2025 executive compensation program.
| | Pay Element | Vehicle | Rationale and Link to Stockholder Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| FIXED | BASE SALARY | Cash | Fixed cash compensation rewards individual performance and scope of responsibility to attract and retain top talent. |
| AT RISK / PERFORMANCE-BASED | SHORT-TERMINCENTIVES | Cash | Promotes strong short-term business results by rewarding key value drivers without creating an incentive to take excessive risk.Serves as key compensation vehicle for rewarding annual results based upon our business plan for the fiscal year, helping to align pay with annual performance. |
| LONG-TERM INCENTIVES | Performance-Based RSUs (paid in shares of Common Stock)Time-based RSUs (paid in shares of Common Stock) | Performance-Based RSUs reward achievement of financial goals and other business objectives as well as retention through the three-year performance period.Equity awards provide a significant stake in the long-term financial success of United that is aligned with stockholder interests and promotes employee retention.Time-based RSUs vest one-third per year over a three-year period, which enhances retention of our NEOs, aligns with compensation practices of our peers and supports stockholder value creation. | |
| OTHER | RETIREMENT BENEFITS | 401(k) plan and excess 401(k) cash direct and cash match program | Creates shared responsibility for retirement through matching contributions. |
| PERQUISITES | Non-cash benefits, such as active flight benefits, health-related benefits and reimbursement for certain tax and financial services | Enhances retention and strengthens our relationships with our executives and generally aligns with market practice for perquisites provided to executives at similar levels at companies within the airline industry and general industry groups. |
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 93 |
Elements of 2025 Executive Compensation
Base Salary
The Committee generally reviews and approves base salaries annually in February, with the new rates effective as of April 1, and makes periodic adjustments in connection with promotions, changes in roles and/or responsibilities or to reward individual performance and promote market competitiveness. In making any such adjustments, the Committee considers individual performance, the NEO’s experience, the breadth, scope and complexity of the NEO’s role, internal pay parity, whether the NEO’s base salary is appropriately positioned relative to similarly-situated executives in our peer group, compensation tally sheets summarizing the NEO’s total target and expected actual compensation, recent compensation adjustments and the average compensation of similarly situated executives in the Company’s peer group, among other factors.
Considering these factors, the Committee determined to increase Mr. Leskinen’s base salary in order to reward Mr. Leskinen for his continued strong performance and contributions to the Company. Each other NEO’s 2025 base salary remained unchanged compared to the NEO’s 2024 base salary.
| | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| · · Base Salary (Annualized Rate) | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | | 2024(1) | | 2025(2) | | % Change | |||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Scott Kirby | | $1,200,000 | | $1,200,000 | - | % | |||
| Brett Hart | | $1,000,000 | | $1,000,000 | - | % | |||
| Torbjorn Enqvist | | $880,000 | | $880,000 | - | % | |||
| Andrew Nocella | | $808,500 | | $808,500 | - | % | |||
| Michael Leskinen | | $770,000 | | $800,000 | | 3.9% | |||
| (1) | Represents the annual base salary rate for each of the NEOs as of the end of Fiscal 2024. |
| (2) | Represents the annual base salary rate that took effect on April 1, 2025. |
Short-Term Incentive Program
The 2025 STI program was designed to sharpen management’s focus on key financial, operational and customer service objectives that are consistent with our business plan for the fiscal year, helping to align pay with annual performance. Executing on our business plan in turn allows us to achieve success that will deliver long-term stockholder value. The awards are paid in cash.
The 2025 STI program was structured with a target opportunity granted to each NEO (based on a percentage of base salary), with an entry payout equal to 50% of the target opportunity, a target payout equal to 100% of the target opportunity and a stretch (also called “maximum”) payout equal to 200% of the target opportunity. The 2025 STI awards were earned on December 31, 2025 and were paid out in March 2026 after the Committee certified performance.
The graphic below illustrates the calculation used to determine 2025 STI payouts:
| Earned Base Salary | X | STI TARGET OPPORTUNITY % | X | Performance Against Annual MEASURES | = | ACTUAL STI AWARD PAYOUT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Determined by reviewing:●Individual performance●Level of responsibility●Specialized qualifications●Experience●Internal pay parity●Internal and market-based peer group data | | Established using:●Level of responsibility●Internal and market-based peer group data●Internal pay parity●Company financial performance | | ●Relative Adjusted EBITDAR Margin (33%)●Net Promoter Score (NPS) (33%)●Operational Excellence (33%) | | ●Capped at 200% of target |
| | |
| 94 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
STI Target Opportunities
The target opportunities as a percentage of base salary for 2025 for our NEOs are shown below.
Such STI target opportunities are determined by the Committee after considering a number of factors, including the breadth, scope and complexity of the NEO’s role, whether the target annual incentive is competitive with target annual incentives for similarly situated executives in our peer group, consideration of internal pay parity and our recent and projected financial performance. In light of these factors, the Committee determined to increase the STI opportunities for each of Messrs. Enqvist, Nocella and Leskinen. The STI target opportunity for each NEO is expressed as a percentage of the executive’s base salary.
| · · · · · · · | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| · · · · · · · | |||
| · · 2025 STI Target Opportunity | |||
| · · Percentage of Base Salary | |||
| Named Executive Officer · · 2024 · · 2025 · · % Change · | |||
| · · · · · · · | |||
| Scott Kirby | 250% | 250% | —% |
| Brett Hart | 175% | 175% | —% |
| Torbjorn Enqvist | 125% | 140% | 12.0% |
| Andrew Nocella | 120% | 125% | 4.2% |
| Michael Leskinen | 120% | 125% | 4.2% |
Performance Measures Underlying the STI Program
At the beginning of the performance year, the Committee undertakes a rigorous, holistic process to establish predefined performance measures that it believes will motivate our executives appropriately to deliver the high performance that supports stockholder value creation in both the short- and long-term in accordance with our compensation philosophy. The 2025 STI program had a performance period of January 1, 2025 through December 31, 2025.
Our 2025 STI performance measures were as follows, with the metrics selected and the targets set by the Committee in February 2025. The Committee believes the performance measures selected appropriately link compensation outcomes to our business strategy in 2025, which is in part focused on maintaining a best-in-class travel experience for our customers and executing certain financial objectives that help us meet our financial guidance, which will enhance long-term value for our stockholders.
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 95 |
| 2025 MEASURE and Weighting | | What It Is | | Why It’s Important |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FY2025 Adjusted EBITDAR Margin relative to industry weighted average Adjusted EBITDAR Margin (33%) | | - Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP financial measure calculated as EBITDAR (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and aircraft rent expense) excluding operating and nonoperating special charges (credits) and unrealized (gains) losses on investments, and, as applicable, adjusted for refinery and fuel hedges.- Adjusted EBITDAR Margin is calculated as Adjusted EBITDAR divided by operating revenue. - Industry Adjusted EBITDAR Margin is calculated to reflect the difference between our Adjusted EBITDAR Margin relative to the revenue weighted average of our industry peers (excluding United) during 2025. | | A critical measure of annual profitability aligning our management’s interests with those of our stockholders; this metric focused on our profit levels as compared with that of our industry peers during 2025. Payout at the entry level required United’s performance to be above the weighted average of certain industry peers, while payout at the stretch level required United to be the leader relative to selected industry peers. |
| Operational Excellence (33%) | | Three Key Airline Operational Metrics:- 33% Customer D:00 (CD:00) (An industry reference for on-time performance that measures departures early or at the scheduled departure time.) (1)- 33% Mishandled Baggage Rate (MBR) (This metric measures the number of customer complaints for delayed, damaged or pilfered bags per total bags handled.) - 33% Seat Cancel Rate (This metric measures the number of cancelled seats divided by scheduled seats. It is a measure of passengers impacted by flight cancellations.)(1) For purpose of this metric, flights otherwise planned to arrive on-time that are intentionally delayed to hold for passenger connections are considered to be on-time departures. | | A measure of operational reliability that focuses management on ensuring reliable and top-tier operations as we expanded our network and operated the largest mainline schedule in Company history over the full year.It is aligned with the operational priorities within the Company’s business plan, key value drivers and industry benchmarks. |
| Net Promoter Score (33%) | | Based on United Customer Survey Results“How likely are you to recommend United Airlines to a friend, relative or colleague?”Stratified based on reliability, mainline/express mix, international/domestic mix and normalized to match United’s 2018 Basic Economy passenger mix.NPS has no standardized industry meaning and, therefore, is not the same as similarly titled measures presented by other companies. | | A measure of customer feedback that provides continued focus on customer satisfaction and tied to the Company’s strategic plan of positioning United to win more brand-loyal customers. |
| | |
| 96 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
2025 STI Outcomes
Threshold, target and maximum performance levels are evaluated independently by the Committee and are set to provide appropriate awards across a range of performance outcomes. In establishing performance measures and levels each year, the Committee considers, among other things: budget; operational priorities; long-term strategic plans; historical performance and external factors, including external expectations; competitive developments; the unique challenges and conditions expected for our business in the upcoming year; and the regulatory environment. The achievement of threshold, target and maximum performance levels were set by the Committee taking into account past performance and long-term plans and were established to be rigorous and challenging to attain and require strong performance and execution to achieve without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking. Consistent with our long-term focus, the STI program historically measures performance against our strategic and operational priorities during the fiscal year, rather than a fixed growth rate or an average of growth rates from prior years, to account for short-term economic and competitive conditions and anticipated strategic investments that may have adverse short-term profit implications.
The payouts for the 2025 STI program were based on an executive’s target bonus amount and the total payout percentage. Company performance results for the year led to a formulaic payout percentage of 135% of target for 2025. The calculation was based on the following performance against the performance measures shown below. To balance transparency with the need to protect competitively sensitive information, the Company has not disclosed certain specific performance targets and results, particularly those relating to detailed business and operational initiatives, where such disclosure could cause competitive harm. However, the Company believes the information provided conveys the rigor of the performance goals and the extent to which they were achieved.
| (1) | The target range for the Relative Adjusted EBITDAR Margin metric was achievement between 40-70% of the difference between the industry weighted average Adjusted EBITDAR Margin and the Adjusted EBITDAR Margin of the peer with highest Adjusted EBITDAR Margin among the select industry peers. |
| (2) | NPS has no standardized industry meaning and, therefore, is not the same as similarly titled measures presented by other companies. As noted above, the performance levels set for NPS were designed to be challenging to attain. |
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 97 |
2025 STI Payments
The actual 2025 STI awards paid to our NEOs are shown in the table below and are also included in the 2025 Summary Compensation Table under the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation column:
| EARNED BASE SALARY | X | STI BLENDED TARGET OPPORTUNITY % | X | PERFORMANCE AGAINST ANNUAL MEASURES | = | ACTUAL STI AWARD PAYOUT |
|---|
| · · · · · · · · · · · · · · | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · · · · · · · · · · · · | |||||||
| · · · · · 2025 STI · · · · · | |||||||
| · · · · · 2025 STI · · · · · · · · | |||||||
| · · Annual Base Salary · · Target · · 2025 STI Target · · Formulaic · · Final | |||||||
| Named Executive Officer · · (as of 12/31/25) · · Opportunity · · Opportunity (1) · · Payout · · Award | |||||||
| · · · · · · · · · · · · · · | |||||||
| Scott Kirby | | $1,200,000 | 250% | $3,000,000 | 135% | $4,050,000 | |
| Brett Hart | | $1,000,000 | 175% | $1,750,000 | 135% | $2,362,500 | |
| Torbjorn Enqvist | | $880,000 | 140% | $1,199,452 | 135% | $1,619,260 | |
| Andrew Nocella | | $808,500 | 125% | $1,000,657 | 135% | $1,350,887 | |
| Michael Leskinen | | $800,000 | 125% | $981,260 | 135% | $1,324,701 | |
| (1) | 2025 STI target opportunity ($) is determined based on a blended rate, which is the product of the NEO’s (x) blended 2025 STI Target Opportunity (%) and (y) blended base salary rate for 2025 (i.e., generally reflecting the lower STI and salary (as applicable) in effect prior to April 1, 2025 for 25% of the year and the STI and salary rates in effect on and after April 1, 2025 for 75% of the year). |
Long-Term Incentive Program
2025 Long-Term Incentive Program Summary
The Committee administers our LTI program with respect to our NEOs and determines, in its informed judgment and in accordance with the terms of the compensation plans, the recipients who may be granted awards, the form and amount of awards, the terms and conditions of awards (including vesting and forfeiture conditions), the timing of awards and the form and content of award agreements. Our LTI program, like our STI program, is designed to focus the efforts of our executives on key drivers of both short- and long-term success and on stockholder value creation. A significant percentage of our NEOs’ compensation is in the form of equity with three-year vesting periods, which is designed to promote retention and closely tie the interests of our NEOs to the interests of our stockholders.
In 2025, we continued to grant two types of long-term award vehicles, which each served a different purpose:
| ● | Performance-Based RSUs: we grant Performance-Based RSU awards that become earned based on the achievement of key financial goals and strategic initiatives determined based on the Company’s business plan for the fiscal year, in order to motivate management to contribute to our future success. The Committee links award payouts to the achievement of clear, preset, measurable performance measures that are designed to be appropriately rigorous and challenging to attain, require strong performance and execution to achieve, support our strategic and operational priorities and promote the creation of sustained stockholder value while at the same time taking care to not incentivize our executives to take inappropriate risk. |
|---|
When establishing our LTI program, the Committee carefully considers the design of the program, including the length of the performance period. Since 2022, when the Company returned to its practice of awarding long-term Performance-Based RSUs, the Company has utilized a structure whereby performance measures are set in one-third increments at the beginning of each year of the three-year performance periods. Over the past three years, the structure of this program has been successful for the Company in its ability to both incentivize management towards performance measures that are aligned with evolving market conditions, strategic priorities and our financial forecasts, as well as to retain our key executives. As a result, the Committee continued to employ this structure in the 2025 LTI program.
| | |
| 98 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
The three-year nature of each Performance-Based RSU grant means that in any year, a NEO can have Performance-Based RSUs relating to up to three performance periods outstanding at any time. Amounts earned for each of these one-year tranches are accrued and paid at the end of the full three-year award cycle, contingent on continued employment through this period, subject to limited exceptions. Each tranche represents the performance measures and targets established by the Committee with respect to 1/3 of the target opportunity under the Performance-Based RSUs. Given that each year’s awards have an overlapping performance period from the prior year, we believe these awards provide the right balance between short-term and long-term focus.
Performance-Based RSUs awarded in 2025 as part of our regular LTI Program are referred to herein as “2025 Performance-Based RSUs,” the Performance-Based RSUs awarded in 2024 are referred to as “2024 Performance-Based RSUs” and the Performance-Based RSUs awarded in 2023 are referred to as “2023 Performance-Based RSUs.”
| | | | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 |
| 2023PBRSU | | Year 1●Relative CASM-ex(1)●Strategic●United Next●Liquidity Condition | | Year 2●Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin(2)●Absolute Adjusted EPS(3)●Strategic●Liquidity Condition | | Year 3●Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin(2)●Absolute Adjusted EPS(3)●Strategic●Liquidity Condition | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 2024PBRSU | | Year 1●Same as above, plus relative total stockholder return (TSR) modifier over three-year performance period | | Year 2●Same as above, plus relative TSR modifier over three-year performance period | | Year 3●Performance measures determined in 2026 | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | 2025Pbrsu | | Year 1●Same as above, but excluding relative TSR modifier | | Year 2●Performance measures determined in 2026 | | Year 3●Performance measures to be determined in 2027 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) | CASM-ex (adjusted cost or operating expense per available seat mile) is a measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. CASM-ex is calculated as cost or operating expense per available seat mile excluding fuel expense, profit sharing, third-party business expenses and special charges (credits). For tranche 1 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, the relative CASM-ex metric measures the relative change in CASM-ex from 2019 compared to the industry average. |
| (2) | Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin is a measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
| (3) | Adjusted EPS is a measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 99 |
| ● | Time-Based RSUs: reward long-term Company performance, support executives’ stock ownership and align with stockholders’ interests. In addition, time-based RSUs are designed to balance performance with stability and retention of our executive leadership team by vesting ratably over three years, generally subject to continued employment requirements. Granting time-based RSUs is also consistent with our compensation peer group’s practices. |
|---|
The following table provides an overview of the key elements of our 2025 Performance-Based RSUs and Time-Based RSUs granted to our NEOs.
| Performance-Based RSUs | Time-Based RSUs | |
| Proportion of Annual Grant | PBRSUs represent 50% of each annual LTI grant at target and each tranche of PBRSUs represents one-third of the annual grant of PBRSUs | Time-based RSUs represent 50% of each annual grant |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 Measures & Weighting | Absolute Adjusted EPS: 40%Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin: 40%Strategic (three strategic initiatives related to technology): 20%Liquidity hurdle: $8 billion in liquidity at end of three-year performance period | Number of shares earned based on continued employment, the value of which increases or decreases with fluctuations in the value of Common Stock |
| Min / Max Payout(% of Target Units) | 0% / 200% | N/A |
| Vesting | Three-Year Cliff | Three-Year Ratable, with vesting occurring on an annual basis |
The following table summarizes the equity awards awarded to our NEOs in 2025. The Committee increased LTI opportunities for each of our NEOs in 2025 after consulting with Exequity and considering the competitive market data. In determining the size of the individual LTI awards granted to our NEOs in 2025 (including whether to make potential increases to 2024 levels), the Committee considered each NEO’s total pay and each individual element of pay to similarly-situated executives in our peer group; individual performance; the NEO’s experience; the breadth, scope and complexity of the NEO’s role; internal pay parity; the NEO’s total target compensation; as well as any outstanding or recently paid special awards and recent compensation adjustments, among other factors. The Committee also considered business factors, including annual financial forecasts, capital expenditure budgets and United’s annual business plan. Ultimately, the Committee determined to increase the LTI opportunities for each of our NEOs primarily in order to align the NEOs’ total target pay with the total target pay of similarly-situated executives in our peer group while ensuring that the NEOs’ total target pay primarily consists of at-risk elements designed to retain executives and support stockholder value creation.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| · · Target Grant Value · · Grant Value · · · | ||||||||||
| · · of PBRSUs · · of RSUs · · Total Target 2025 | ||||||||||
| · · Awarded in · · Granted in · · Equity Compensation | ||||||||||
| Named Executive Officer | | 2025 (1) | | 2025 | | ($)(2) | ||||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Scott Kirby | | $8,250,000 | | $8,250,000 | | $16,500,000 | | |||
| Brett Hart | | $5,125,000 | | $5,125,000 | | $10,250,000 | | |||
| Torbjorn Enqvist | | $2,332,000 | | $2,332,000 | | $4,664,000 | | |||
| Andrew Nocella | | $2,021,250 | | $2,021,250 | | $4,042,500 | | |||
| Michael Leskinen | | $1,800,000 | | $1,800,000 | | $3,600,000 | | |||
| (1) | Represents the annual RSU and Performance-Based RSU awards made in February 2025, assuming target performance for PBRSUs. The number of shares of Common Stock subject to the awards was determined by dividing the applicable value in the table by the closing stock price on the grant date and rounding down to the nearest whole unit. |
| | |
| 100 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
| (2) | The target grant values associated with the 2025 Performance-Based RSUs in this table reflect the full target value of all three regular annual tranches of such awards, despite the fact that the portions attributable to performance measures in 2026 and 2027 will not be treated as formally “granted” for purposes of the executive compensation tables following this CD&A until the performance measures for those future tranches are established. Accordingly, the target values reflected in this table differ from those of the subsequent tables, which, consistent with disclosure rules, include the value of PBRSU grants only when the performance measures for each year are established. |
2025 Performance-Based RSUs
2025 Performance-Based RSU awards have a target opportunity of 100% of the target award value and a maximum or “stretch” opportunity equal to 200% of the target award value. Payment opportunities under PBRSU awards are subject to linear interpolation between performance levels.
The primary performance measures and weights used for tranche 3 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, tranche 2 of the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs and tranche 1 of the 2025 Performance Based RSUs, are identical to each other and are set forth in the table below. The Committee chose the below three performance measures because it believed that, together, they represented an appropriate mix of financial goals and other business objectives to deliver long-term value to our stockholders, transform the customer experience, attract more brand-loyal customers and assist with achieving our financial objectives that help us meet our financial guidance. The performance metrics and goals were established based on the Company’s financial plan and operating and strategic initiatives and were designed to be challenging but attainable with strong management performance. To balance transparency with the need to protect competitively sensitive information, the Company has not disclosed certain specific performance targets and results, particularly those relating to longer-term strategic and operational initiatives, where such disclosure could cause competitive harm. However, the Company believes the information provided conveys the rigor of the performance goals and the extent to which they were achieved.
| Performance Measures | Entry(50%) | Target (100%) | Stretch (200%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute Adjusted EPS (40%) | | | |
| United’s 2025 Adjusted EPS | $7.50 | $11.50 - $13.50 | $15.50 |
| Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin (40%) | | | |
| Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin relative to the weighted average Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin of a focused set of industry peers. Achievement at the entry level required United’s performance to be greater than the industry weighted average and achievement at the stretch level required United to be the leader relative to the selected industry peers. The target range for the relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin metric was achievement between 40-70% of the difference between the industry weighted average Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin and the Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin of the peer with highest Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin among the peer group. | Greater than average | 40%-70% of range between entry and stretch levels | #1 Rank |
| STRATEGIC (20%) | | | |
| Increase mobile app usage on the day of travel | 79% of customer passenger name records (“PNRs”) | 83% of customer PNRs | 86% of customer PNRs |
| Installation of Starlink connectivity on United Express aircraft and enable new advertising channels | Complete initial installation of Starlink on UAX aircraft and enable new advertising channels | 247 UAX aircraft | 330 UAX aircraft |
| One quantitative and one qualitative indicator, each weighted equally, related to transitioning towards retiring legacy mainframe systems required for daily operations | ●60% of quantitative indicator ●Completion of pre-established qualitative indicator | ●80% of quantitative indicator●Completion of pre-established qualitative indicator | ●100% of quantitative indicator ●Completion of pre-established qualitative indicator |
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 101 |
In addition to the above performance measures for calendar year 2025, payout of the Performance-Based RSUs are contingent on the achievement of a cash liquidity hurdle ($8 billion) as of the end of the three-year performance period.
2025 Time-Based RSUs
Time-Based RSUs make up the remaining 50% of our executives’ target long-term equity incentives. Each grant of RSUs vests one-third on each of February 28, 2026, February 28, 2027 and February 28, 2028. Time-based RSUs enhance retention of our NEOs, align with compensation practices of our peers and support stockholder value creation.
2023 Performance-Based RSUs and 2024 Performance-Based RSUs
Details relating to the performance measures established in 2023 for the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs (applies to tranche 1 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, tranche 2 of the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs and tranche 3 of the 2025 Performance-Based RSUs) are set forth on pages 102 through 104 of United’s 2024 proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 12, 2024.
Details relating to the performance measures established in 2024 for the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs (applies to tranche 1 of the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs and tranche 2 of the 2025 Performance-Based RSUs) are set forth on pages 100 through 101 of United’s 2025 proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 10, 2025.
| | |
| 102 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
Payout of 2023 Performance-Based RSUs (Completed Performance Period)
Under the terms of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, 2025 represented the final year of the three-year performance period. The 2023 Performance-Based RSUs vested based on performance measures established on an annual basis during the three-year performance period commencing January 1, 2023 and ending December 31, 2025. The 2023 Performance-Based RSUs were divided into three tranches that were each weighted as 1/3 of the target 2023 Performance-Based RSUs. The 2023 Performance-Based RSUs had a continued service condition, generally requiring the NEO’s continued employment through the end of 2025 to vest.
Below is a summary of the Company’s performance results under the performance measures of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, which resulted in an overall vesting level 134% of target. The performance measures and targets were designed to be challenging to attain and require strong management performance and execution to achieve, which was ultimately reflected by the overall vesting level of 134% of target.
The awards vested at the end of 2025 and were settled in the first quarter of 2026 and are included in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2025” table.
| · · | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · Performance Measures (1) · TrancheWeighting · Entry (50%) · Target (100%) · Stretch (200%) · Actual Results · Payout(as % ofTarget) · FinalPayout(as % ofTarget) | ||||||||||
| Tranche 1 | | CASM-ex (2, 3) | 40% | Equal to industry avg | 1 to 2 pts better than industry avg | 4 pts better than industry avg | 1.97 pts better than industry avg | 100% | | |
| | Technician Hiring (4) | 13% | Target level -5% | Significantly higher than historical levels | Target level +5% | Between Target and Stretch | 160% | | ||
| | United Next Actions | 27% | (5) | (5) | (5) | (5) | 183% | | ||
| | Strategic Actions (# of actions completed) (6) | 20% | Environmental : 6People & Responsible Sourcing : 6 | Environmental : 8People & Responsible Sourcing : 7 | Environmental : 10People & Responsible Sourcing : 8 | Environmental : 9People & ResponsibleSourcing : 7 | 125% | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | 135% | |
| Tranche 2 | | Absolute Adjusted EPS (7) | 40% | $5 | $9 - $11 | $13 | $10.61 | 100% | | |
| | Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin (8) | 40% | -0.5% | +0.5% - +1.0% | 2.0% | 2.7% | 200% | | ||
| | Strategic Actions (# of actions completed) (6) | 20% | Environmental: 6People & Responsible Sourcing: 6 | Environmental: 8People & Responsible Sourcing: 7 | Environmental: 10People & ResponsibleSourcing: 8 | Environmental: 8People & Responsible Sourcing: 8 | 150% | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | 150% | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tranche 3 | | Absolute Adjusted EPS (7) | 40% | $7.50 | $11.50 - $13.50 | $15.50 | $10.62 | 89% | | |
| | Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin (8) | 40% | Greater than average | 40%-70% of range between entry and stretch levels | #1 rank | 87.0% in range | 157% | | ||
| | Strategic Action: Mobile App Usage | 6.66% | 79% of customer PNRs | 83% of customer PNRs | 86% of customer PNRs | 83% of customer PNRs | 100% | | ||
| | Strategic Action: Starlink Installation | 6.66% | Complete initial installation of Starlink on UAX aircraft and enable new advertising channels | 247 UAX aircraft | 330 UAX aircraft | 277 UAX aircraft | 136% | | ||
| | Strategic Action: Retirement of legacy mainframe system | 6.66% | 60% of quantitative factorCompletion of pre-established qualitative factor | 80% of quantitative factorCompletion of pre-established qualitative factor | 100% of quantitative factorCompletion of pre-established qualitative factor | 50% of quantitative factorCompletion of target level pre-established qualitative factor | 50% | | ||
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | 117% |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Total payout under 2023 Performance-Based RSUs (as % of target) (9) | 134% | |||||
| (1) | For a detailed description of the performance measures established in 2023 for tranche 1 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, see pages 102 through 104 of United’s 2024 proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 12, 2024. For a detailed description of the performance measures established in 2024 for tranche 2 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, see page 100 of United’s 2025 proxy statement filed with the SEC on April 10, 2025. For a detailed description of the performance measures for tranche 3 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs, see “2025 Performance-Based RSUs” above on page 101. |
| (2) | CASM-ex is a non-GAAP financial measure. CASM-ex is calculated as cost or operating expense per available seat mile excluding fuel expense, profit sharing, third-party business expenses and special charges (credits). |
| (3) | The performance measure is based on the relative change in 2023 CASM-ex from 2019 as compared with the industry average. |
| (4) | This performance measure is the number of frontline technicians hired (as a % of 4th quarter authorization). |
| (5) | Below sets forth the entry, target, stretch and actual achievement levels for each of the six United Next metrics within this performance measure for tranche 1 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs. |
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 103 |
| Metric | Entry(50%) | Target(100%) | Stretch (200%) | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Tech Ops line maintenance footprint expansion | | Significantly expand our current maintenance location footprint | Above Stretch | |
| 2. Aircraft parking position | EWR + 4 other hubs | EWR + 5 other hubs | All 7 hubs | Stretch |
| 3. Aircraft parts supply/availability | 1 pt improve | 1.25 pts improve | 1.5 pts improve | Above Stretch |
| 4. AirTop surface/air traffic mgmt. simulation model | 57% of hub departures | 75% of hub departures | 85% of hub departures | Stretch |
| 5. Leverage FAA system-wide info management | Build and test an air traffic management tool | Implementation of an enhanced air traffic management tool and the management of 50% of Ground Delay Program traffic | Implementation of an enhanced air traffic management tool and the management of 85% of Ground Delay Program traffic | Stretch |
| 6. Enhance efficiency of air traffic flow | Develop TOS capability | TOS testing 1 location | TOS in live operation | Target |
| (6) | The Compensation Committee incorporated this objective and measurable performance metric into the Company’s LTI to reflect the Company’s focus on long-term value creation for its stockholders by incentivizing management to reach various performance indicators that will assist the Company in achieving certain key commitments and initiatives relating to its environmental sustainability, people impact and responsible sourcing programs. The performance indicators were designed to be challenging but achievable with strong management performance. |
| (7) | Absolute Adjusted EPS is a measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
| (8) | Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin is a measure that is not calculated in accordance with GAAP, with relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin measured by comparing our Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin against performance of selected industry peers. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and a reconciliation of Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure. |
| (9) | Vesting of the 2023 Performance-Based RSUs was also subject to an $8 billion cash liquidity hurdle at the end of the three-year performance period, which was achieved. |
Additionally, Mr. Leskinen received a promotional PBRSU award in 2023 that vested 50% based on performance measures established in 2024 and 50% based on performance measures established in 2025, consistent with performance measures and results set forth in the table above on the rows “Tranche 2” and “Tranche 3,” respectively. This resulted in an overall vesting level of 134% of target.
Open Performance Periods
Performance under the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs and 2025 Performance-Based RSUs will be determined following the end of the three-year performance periods ending December 31, 2026 and 2027, respectively, given that certain underlying performance measures (including the liquidity condition and, for the 2024 Performance-Based RSUs, the relative TSR modifier) are still outstanding. The performance metrics and relative weights for the 2025 Performance-Based RSUs are set forth above on page 101 in the table under the heading “2025 Performance-Based RSUs.”
Performance under the remaining two tranches of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards (as described below) will be determined following the end of the annual performance periods on June 30, 2026 and June 30, 2027, respectively, given that underlying performance measures remain outstanding. The performance measures and relative weights for the remaining two tranches of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards are set forth on pages 103-104 of the Company’s 2025 Proxy Statement filed with the SEC on April 10, 2025.
Payout of Transformation Incentive Awards (Completed Performance Period)
In September 2022, the Committee approved performance-based incentive awards (the “Transformation Incentive Awards”) to each of our NEOs other than Mr. Leskinen. The Transformation Incentive Awards provided an incentive opportunity of 50% to 150% of the target opportunity (or 0% to 150% with respect to Mr. Kirby) based on the achievement of a pre-established human capital performance measure during the period January 1, 2023 through June 30, 2025, with a service-based vesting condition over a three year period beginning September 22, 2022 and ending September 22, 2025. For recipients other than Mr. Kirby, the Transformation Incentive Award vested with respect to 25% of the target opportunity on each of September 22, 2023 and September 22, 2024. Mr. Kirby’s Transformation Incentive Award did not include interim vesting dates and his Transformation Award opportunity vested on September 22, 2025.
| | |
| 104 | 2026 Proxy Statement |
In September 2025 the Committee certified performance of the Transformation Incentive Awards at 132% of the total target opportunity level based on achievement of the underlying performance measure and subsequently, based on the level of performance achieved: (i) each of Messrs. Hart, Enqvist and Nocella received the remaining portion of their award, reduced by the amounts received on the interim vesting dates, as follows: Mr. Hart—$2,870,000; Mr. Enqvist—$2,050,000; and Mr. Nocella—$1,640,000, as reflected in the “2025 Summary Compensation Table,” (ii) Mr. Kirby received the entire cash portion of his Transformation Incentive Award, which was equal to $3,960,000, as reflected in the “2025 Summary Compensation Table,” and (iii) the equity portion of Mr. Kirby’s Transformation Incentive Award vested on September 22, 2025, as reflected in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2025” table. Below is a summary of the Company’s performance results under the performance measure for the Transformation Incentive Award.
| | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Performance Measure | Entry(0% or 50%) | Target(100%) | Stretch (150%) | Actual Results |
| Annualized number of pilots hired, trained and available to fly at end of performance period (1) | 1.0x | 2.0x | 4.6x | 3.68x |
| (1) | Measured as a multiple of the average annual number of pilots hired from 2013-2018. |
Payout of First Tranche of 2024 Retention LTI Awards (Completed Performance Period)
In July 2024, the Committee awarded each of our NEOs an award of Performance-Based RSUs, which were designed to motivate, retain and reward our executive team in a period of retention vulnerabilities within the industry and incentivize our executives to maintain and drive key financial metrics (the “2024 Retention LTI Awards”). The 2024 Retention LTI Awards vested or will vest in one-third increments over three years, subject to achievement of the following performance measures:
| ● | Absolute Adjusted EPS (First Tranche and Second Tranche) — The first and second tranches of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards became earned or may become earned based on our positive Adjusted EPS during the four quarters ending June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2026, respectively, as well as continued employment through each applicable vesting date. |
| ● | Relative Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin (Third Tranche) — The third tranche of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards may become earned based on our Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin during the four quarters ending June 30, 2027 relative to the weighted average Adjusted Pre-Tax Margin of selected industry peers during the same period and is also subject to an Adjusted EPS performance measure. Continued employment through the applicable vesting date is required. |
During 2025, the Committee certified performance of the first tranche of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards. As a result of the Company’s net positive Adjusted EPS during the four quarters ending June 30, 2025 equal to $11.37, the first tranche of the 2024 Retention LTI Awards resulted in an overall vesting level of 100% of target. The first tranches vested on July 25, 2025 and were settled in shares shortly thereafter and are included in the “Option Exercises and Stock Vested for 2025” table.
Use of Adjustments in Incentive Programs
Our goal is to pay incentives based on the same underlying business trends and results that our investors are using to measure United performance. To incentivize management to make decisions that have positive, long-term impacts, even at the expense of shorter-term results, and to prevent one-time gains and losses from having too great of an impact on incentive payouts, the Committee reviews whether to adjust results under the 2025 STI program, tranches 1, 2 and 3 of the 2023 Performance-Based RSU awards, tranches 1 and 2 of the 2024 Performance-Based RSU awards, and tranche 1 of the 2025 Performance-Based RSU awards, although no such adjustment has been made as of the Record Date with respect to such awards.
| | |
|---|---|
| 2026 Proxy Statement | 105 |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.