VOTING ROADMAP
| | Proposal 1: Election of Directors Proposal (see page 12) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH DIRECTOR NOMINEE | | | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each director nominee. These individuals bring a range of relevant experiences and overall diversity of perspectives that is essential to good governance and leadership of our company. See pages 12 – 18 for further information. | | |
|---|
OUR DIRECTOR NOMINEES
| | | | RICHARD R. GREEN | |
| | Director Since: 2025 Independent Director | | | Committee(s): Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair); Audit; Compensation | |
|---|
| | Dr. Green brings to the Board his extensive professional and executive background and his particular knowledge and experience in the complex and rapidly changing field of technology for broadband communications services, which contributes to our company’s evaluation of technological initiatives and challenges and strengthens the Board’s collective qualifications, skills and attributes. | | |
|---|
| | | | JEDD GOULD | |
| | Director Since: 2025 Independent Director | | | Committee(s): Audit | |
|---|
| | Mr. Gould brings to the board in-depth knowledge relating to the intersection of media and advertising, as well as familiarity with local Alaska media, which broadens the Board’s qualifications and skills. | | |
|---|
CURRENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS AT A GLANCE
BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS
| | Effective Independent Oversight | | | | Strong Governance Practices | |
|---|
| | • Separate Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer • 67% of our directors are independent • Executive sessions of independent directors held without the participation of management • and nominating and corporate governance committees Independent directors chair the audit, compensation | | | | • Succession planning • Stockholder access to the director nomination process • Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which are published online • Directors have unabridged access to senior management and other company employees | |
|---|
| | Effective Independent Oversight | | | | Strong Governance Practices | |
|---|
| | • Ability to engage with independent consultants or advisors • No compensation committee interlocks or compensation committee engagement in related party transactions in 2025 | | | | • Anonymous “whistleblowing” channels for any concerns • Well-established risk oversight process | |
|---|
| | Proposal 2: Auditors Ratification Proposal (see page 28) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL | | | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this proposal because KPMG LLP is an independent firm with few ancillary services and reasonable fees, and has significant industry and financial reporting expertise. See pages 28 – 29 for further information. | | |
|---|
| | Proposal 3: Say-on-Pay Proposal (see page 31) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL | | | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the say-on-pay proposal because the compensation structure is aligned with our ultimate goal of appropriately motivating our executives to increase long-term company value. See page 31 for further information. | | |
|---|
| | Proposal 4: Say-on-Frequency Proposal (see page 32) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL | | | 3 YEARS | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends that stockholders vote in favor of the 3 YEARS frequency option with respect to the frequency with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on the compensation paid to our named executive officers. See pages 32 – 33 for further information. | | |
|---|
| | Proposal 5: Articles Amendment Proposal (see page 34) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL | | | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this proposal because it is expected to better align with recent changes to Nevada law and promote efficiency for the company by allowing for expedited trials for internal actions without the need for jury selection, instructions and deliberation or the additional time needed to explain complex corporate concepts to individuals with only a lay understanding. See pages 34 – 35 for further information. | | |
|---|
| | Proposal 6: Adjournment Proposal (see page 36) | | |
|---|
| | OUR BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THIS PROPOSAL | | | |
|---|
| | The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR this proposal because it will allow the company to permit further solicitation of proxies if necessary or appropriate. See page 36 for further information. | | |
|---|
| | 4 / 2026 PROXY STATEMENT | |
|---|
