Medalist Diversified REIT, Inc.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 2, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 2, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-27.
0001558370-25-001807
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-02.
0001104659-26-022253
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 223 previous paragraphs and 286 current paragraphs.
98 unchanged; 83 reworded; 95 added; 35 removed; 7 previous and 10 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 37 previous and 49 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (95)
Current report
Risks Related to our Strategic Transition and Termination of our REIT Status
Current report
Risks Related to our Capital Allocation and Investment Strategy
Current report
Risks Related to our Delaware Statutory Trust (DST) Program
Current report
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry and Real Estate Held in our Legacy Portfolio and through our DST Program
Current report
Risks Related to our REIT Status Through December 31, 2025
Current report
Risks Related to our Operations and Internal Controls
Current report
Risks Related to our Public Company Status and the Ownership of our Common Stock
Current report
Risks Related to our Strategic Transition and Termination of our REIT Status
Current report
We may not successfully execute our strategic repositioning.
Current report
We are in the process of repositioning our business from a traditional equity REIT model toward our DST Program and a more capital allocation–focused structure, which includes monetizing certain legacy real estate assets, developing fee-based business lines, managing an investment portfolio, and evaluating potential strategic transactions. The successful execution of this repositioning depends on a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control, including market conditions, access to capital, regulatory considerations, and the availability of attractive investment opportunities.
Current report
Our repositioning strategy may require significant management attention and operational focus, and we may encounter unforeseen challenges, delays, or costs in implementing our plans. There can be no assurance that our strategic initiatives will generate anticipated returns, enhance stockholder value, or improve our financial performance. If we are unable to successfully execute our repositioning strategy, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and the market price of our common stock could be adversely affected.
Current report
We are seeking to maximize stockholder value by exploring strategic alternatives. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in executing a strategic transaction.
Current report
We are actively considering strategic alternatives in an effort to unlock and maximize stockholder value. We may not be able to identify or consummate a suitable transaction and do not currently have any commitments relating to any transactions. We may not be able to successfully implement a strategic transaction we pursue, and even if we determine to pursue one or more strategic transactions, we may be unable to do so on acceptable financial terms and any such transaction may not improve the market price of our common stock. Pursuing a strategic opportunity is subject to risks, including those outlined herein, and if we are unsuccessful in consummating a strategic transaction, our business could be materially adversely affected.
Current report
Our ability to dispose of certain of our legacy real estate assets on favorable terms is subject to real estate market conditions, capital markets availability, buyer demand, interest rate levels, and other factors beyond our control.
Current report
As part of our strategic repositioning, we intend to continue monetizing certain legacy real estate assets. Our ability to dispose of these properties on favorable terms is subject to real estate market conditions, capital markets availability, buyer demand, interest rate levels, and other factors beyond our control.
Current report
We may be unable to sell properties at or above their carrying values, which could result in impairment charges or realized losses. In addition, the timing of dispositions may be delayed due to market conditions or transaction complexities, which could reduce our ability to redeploy capital in a timely manner. During the disposition process, properties may experience leasing challenges, increased operating costs, or deferred capital expenditures, which could adversely affect their value.
Current report
Furthermore, as properties are sold, we will reduce or eliminate the recurring rental income associated with those assets. If we are unable to replace that income with earnings from treasury investments, fee-based activities, or other strategic initiatives on a timely basis, our revenues and cash flows may decline during the transition period.
Current report
We intend to remain a publicly traded company following our strategic transition, which requires us to continue to incur substantial general and administrative expenses
Current report
We intend to remain a publicly traded company following our strategic transition, which requires us to continue to incur substantial general and administrative expenses, including costs associated with SEC reporting, internal controls, audit and legal fees, NASDAQ listing requirements, director and officer insurance, and other governance-related expenses.
Current report
As we monetize real estate assets and reposition our business, our recurring rental revenues may decline before new income streams from treasury investments, fee-based businesses, or strategic transactions are fully developed. During this transition period, our fixed public company costs may represent a higher percentage of revenue, which could result in operating losses or reduced profitability. If we are unable to align our cost structure with our evolving revenue base, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Current report
Our obligations to pay income taxes may increase beginning in 2026, which will result in a reduction to our earnings, and could have negative consequences to us.
Current report
We revoked our REIT election and become a taxable corporation effective January 1, 2026, which will result in a higher provision for federal and state income taxes, which could impair our ability to satisfy our financial obligations and negatively impact the price of our securities. Further, federal and state income tax rates could increase in the future, exacerbating these risks. We can provide no assurance that federal or state income tax rates will not increase in the future.
Current report
We may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of revoking our REIT election and becoming a taxable corporation effective January 1, 2026, or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected, if at all, or may not offset the costs of revoking our REIT election and becoming a taxable corporation.
Current report
We believe that revoking our REIT election and becoming a taxable corporation will, among other things, provide us with greater flexibility to invest in non-real estate assets, have concentrated ownership, and use our free cash flows as we will no longer be required to operate under the REIT rules. However, we may not find non-real estate assets worth investing in or the amount of our free cash flows may not meet our expectations, which may reduce, or eliminate, the anticipated benefits of the transition from a REIT to a taxable corporation. Our failure to achieve the anticipated benefits of the transition from a REIT to a taxable corporation at all, or in a timely manner, or a failure of any benefits realized to offset its costs, could negatively affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or the market price of our common stock.
Current report
Our revocation of our REIT election will change the tax treatment of our dividends.
Current report
Distributions by a REIT are generally taxable to stockholders as ordinary income (subject to certain deductions available to non-corporate taxpayers), whereas distributions by a C-corporation are generally treated as dividends taxable at applicable qualified dividend rates to the extent of current or accumulated earnings and profits. In addition, we will become subject to corporate-level federal and state income taxes on our taxable income, which may reduce the amount of cash available for reinvestment or distribution.
Current report
The change in tax status may affect the after-tax return profile of an investment in our common stock for certain stockholders, including those that previously invested in us specifically for REIT-related tax characteristics. The transition may also result in taxable events to stockholders depending on their individual circumstances. Any such changes could influence investor demand for our shares and affect the trading price of our common stock. Stockholders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the consequences of the revocation of our REIT election.
Current report
We may not be able to fully utilize our NOL and NCL carryforwards, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Current report
We record an asset for the future tax benefits from unused U.S. federal and state net operating losses (“NOLs”) and net capital losses (“NCLs”). Federal and state taxing bodies often place limitations on NOL and NCL carryforward benefits. As a result, we may not be able to utilize our NOLs or NCLs.
Current report
In general, under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, a corporation that undergoes an ownership change is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change NOLs and NCLs to offset future taxable income and net capital gain income. An “ownership change” occurs if 5% shareholders increase their collective ownership of the aggregate amount of the outstanding shares of our company
Current report
by more than 50 percentage points looking back over the relevant testing period. The determination of whether an ownership change has occurred or will occur is complicated and depends on changes in percentage stock ownership among shareholders. Based on our knowledge of our stock ownership, we do not believe that an ownership change has occurred since our losses were generated. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Sections 382 and 383 of the Code. As a result, no assurance can be provided as to whether an ownership change has occurred or will occur in the future.
Current report
In addition, there is also a risk that a future statutory or regulatory changes could limit our ability to offset future income tax liabilities with NOLs or NCLs. For these reasons, we may not be able to utilize a material portion of our NOLs and NCLs, which could potentially result in increased future tax liabilities to us and could adversely affect our results of operations.
Current report
Preserving the ability to use our NOLs and NCLs may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities.
Current report
Limitations imposed by Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code may discourage us from, among other things, repurchasing our stock or issuing additional stock to raise capital or to acquire businesses or assets. Accordingly, our desire to preserve our NOLs and NCLs may cause us to forgo otherwise attractive opportunities.
Current report
Our strategic transition could impact market perception of our publicly traded stock.
Current report
Our transition from an equity REIT to a DST Program and capital allocation–focused public company represents a significant shift in our business model and investment profile. Investors may have difficulty evaluating our company during this transition period, particularly as we monetize legacy real estate assets, deploy capital into treasury and other short-duration investments, develop fee-based businesses such as our DST platform, and evaluate potential strategic transactions. Our financial results during this period may be less predictable and may not be comparable to our historical operating results as a REIT.
Current report
In addition, certain investors that focus on REITs or income-oriented investments may choose to reduce or eliminate their holdings following our revocation of REIT status. Changes in our stockholder base, uncertainty regarding the timing and execution of our strategic initiatives, or differing views regarding our long-term capital allocation strategy could result in increased volatility in the trading price of our common stock. If the market does not perceive our strategic transition as value-enhancing, our stock price and access to capital could be adversely affected.
Current report
Risks Related to our Capital Allocation and Investment Strategy
Current report
We may be unable to execute our strategic framework, which contemplates the potential acquisition of operating businesses, investment platforms, or other assets that we believe may enhance stockholder value.
Current report
The success of our acquisition strategy that contemplates the potential acquisition of operating businesses or other assets depends on our ability to identify suitable targets, negotiate favorable terms, complete transactions efficiently, and integrate acquired operations effectively.
Showing the first 40 of 95 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (35)
Previous report
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry and Investments in Real Estate
Previous report
Risks Related to Taxes and Our Taxation as a REIT
Previous report
We utilize, and intend to continue to utilize, leverage, which may limit our financial flexibility in the future.
Previous report
Risks Related to the Real Estate Industry and Investments in Real Estate
Previous report
Risks Related to Taxes and Our Taxation as a REIT
Previous report
Our failure to qualify as a REIT would result in higher taxes and reduced cash available for stockholders.
Previous report
REIT distribution requirements could adversely affect our liquidity.
Previous report
In order to maintain our REIT status and to meet the REIT distribution requirements, we may need to borrow funds on a short-term basis or sell assets, even if the then-prevailing market conditions are not favorable for these borrowings or sales. To qualify as a REIT, we generally must distribute to our stockholders at least 90% of our REIT taxable income each year, excluding capital gains. In addition, we will be subject to corporate income tax to the extent we distribute less than 100% of our REIT taxable income including any net capital gain. We intend to make distributions to our stockholders to comply with the requirements of the Code for REITs and to minimize or eliminate our corporate income tax obligation to the extent consistent with our business objectives. Our cash flows from operations may be insufficient to fund required distributions as a result of differences in timing between the actual receipt of income and the recognition of income for federal income tax purposes, or the effect of non-deductible capital expenditures, the creation of reserves or required debt service or amortization payments. The insufficiency of our cash flows to cover our distribution requirements could have an adverse impact on our ability to raise short- and long-term debt or sell equity securities in order to fund distributions required to maintain our REIT status. In addition, we will be subject to a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which distributions paid by us in any calendar year are less than the sum of 85% of our ordinary income, 95% of our capital gain net income and 100% of our undistributed income from prior years.
Previous report
Further, amounts distributed will not be available to fund investment activities. We expect to fund our investments by raising equity capital and through borrowings from financial institutions and the debt capital markets. If we fail to obtain debt or equity capital in the future, it could limit our ability to grow, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of our common stock.
Previous report
In particular, we must ensure that at the end of each calendar quarter, at least 75% of the value of our assets consists of cash, cash items, government securities and qualified real estate assets. The remainder of our investment in securities (other than government securities, securities of Taxable REIT Subsidiaries (“TRSs”) and qualified real estate assets) generally cannot include more than 10% of the
Previous report
outstanding voting securities of any one issuer or more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. In addition, in general, no more than 5% of the value of our assets (other than government securities, securities of TRSs and qualified real estate assets) can consist of the securities of any one issuer, and no more than 20% of the value of our total assets can be represented by the securities of one or more TRSs. If we fail to comply with these requirements at the end of any calendar quarter, we generally must correct the failure within 30 days after the end of the calendar quarter or qualify for certain statutory relief provisions to avoid losing our REIT qualification and suffering adverse tax consequences. As a result, we may be required to liquidate otherwise attractive investments. These actions could have the effect of reducing our income and amounts available for distribution to our stockholders.
Previous report
Even if we remain qualified as a REIT, we may be subject to certain federal, state and local taxes on our income and assets, including taxes on any undistributed income, tax on income from some activities conducted as a result of a foreclosure, and state or local income, property and transfer taxes. In addition, any TRS in which we own an interest will be subject to regular corporate federal, state and local taxes. Any of these taxes would decrease cash available for distributions to stockholders.
Previous report
The stock ownership restrictions of the Code for REITs and the 3.6% stock ownership limits in our charter may inhibit market activity in our capital stock and restrict our business combination opportunities.
Previous report
In order to qualify as a REIT, five or fewer individuals, as defined in the Code to include specified private foundations, employee benefit plans and trusts, and charitable trusts, may not own, beneficially or constructively, more than 50% in value of our issued and outstanding stock at any time during the last half of a taxable year. Attribution rules in the Code determine if any individual or entity beneficially or constructively owns our capital stock under this requirement. Additionally, at least 100 persons must beneficially own our capital stock during at least 335 days of a taxable year. To help ensure that we meet these tests, among other purposes, our charter restricts the acquisition and ownership of shares of our capital stock.
Previous report
Our charter, with certain exceptions, authorizes our directors to take such actions as are necessary and desirable to preserve our qualification as a REIT. Unless exempted, prospectively or retroactively, by our board of directors, our charter prohibits any person from beneficially or constructively owning more than 3.6% in value of the aggregate of our outstanding shares of capital stock or 3.6% in value or number of shares, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Our board of directors may not grant an exemption from these restrictions to any proposed transferee whose ownership in excess of such thresholds does not satisfy certain conditions designed to ensure that we will not fail to qualify as a REIT. These restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply, however, if our board of directors determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT or that compliance is no longer required for REIT qualification.
Previous report
On November 4, 2022, our board of directors exempted Alfred Lee Finley from the ownership limits. In connection with that exemption, our board of directors set Mr. Finley’s ownership limit at 15.05% of our issued and outstanding common stock. On August 8, 2023, our board of directors exempted Francis P. Kavanaugh, our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of our board of directors, from the ownership limits. Our board of directors set Mr. Kavanaugh’s ownership limit at 20.00% of our issued and outstanding common stock. On December 13, 2024, our board of directors exempted Marc Carlson from the ownership limits. Our board of directors set Mr. Carlson’s ownership limit at 7.43% of our issued and outstanding common stock. On December 13, 2024, our board of directors exempted the Kramerica Trust, Dated July 24, 2015 from the ownership limits. Our board of directors set the Kramerica Trust, Dated July 24, 2015’s ownership limit at 7.43% of our issued and outstanding common stock. On December 13, 2024, our board of directors exempted C. Brent Winn, Jr., our Chief Financial Officer from the ownership limits. Our board of directors set Mr. Winn’s ownership limit at 4.90% of our issued and outstanding common stock. As of the date of this annual report, our top five stockholders, by share ownership, beneficially own 47.72% of our issued and outstanding common stock. If any of these stockholders increase their holdings, we could go over the 50% threshold which could result in our failure to qualify or preserve our status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. If this were to occur, your investment would be negatively affected.
Previous report
The maximum tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income” payable to U.S. stockholders that are taxed at individual rates is 20% (exclusive of the application of the net investment tax). Dividends payable by REITs, however, generally are not eligible for the reduced rates on qualified dividend income. However, qualified REIT dividends received by non-corporate stockholders are taxed at reduced
Previous report
rates under changes made in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. In taxable years beginning before January 1, 2026, non-corporate U.S. stockholders are entitled to a deduction of up to 20% of their qualified REIT dividends, subject to certain limitations. Nevertheless, the more favorable rates applicable to regular corporate qualified dividends could cause investors who are taxed at individual rates to perceive investments in REITs to be relatively less attractive than investments in the stocks of non-REIT corporations that pay dividends, which could adversely affect the value of the shares of REITs, including our common stock.
Previous report
We may be unable to generate sufficient revenue from operations, operating cash flow or portfolio income to pay our operating expenses, and our operating expenses could rise, diminishing our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Previous report
As a REIT, we are generally required to distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, determined without regard to the dividends paid deduction and not including net capital gains, each year to our stockholders. To qualify for the tax benefits accorded to REITs, we have and intend to continue to make distributions to our stockholders in amounts such that we distribute all or substantially all our net taxable income each year, subject to certain adjustments. However, our ability to make distributions may be adversely affected by the risk factors described herein. Our ability to make and sustain cash distributions is based on many factors, including the return on our investments, the size of our investment portfolio, operating expense levels, and certain restrictions imposed by Maryland law. Some of the factors are beyond our control and a change in any such factor could affect our ability to pay future dividends. No assurance can be given as to our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders. In the event of a downturn in our operating results and financial performance or unanticipated declines in the value of our asset portfolio, we may be unable to declare or pay quarterly distributions or make distributions to our stockholders. The timing and amount of distributions are in the sole discretion of our board of directors, which considers, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition, debt service obligations and applicable debt covenants, REIT qualification requirements and other tax considerations and capital expenditure requirements as our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time.
Previous report
Although our use of TRSs may partially mitigate the impact of meeting the requirements necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT, our ownership of and relationship with our TRSs will be limited, and a failure to comply with the limits would jeopardize our REIT qualification and may result in the application of a 100% excise tax.
Previous report
A REIT may own up to 100% of the stock of one or more TRSs. A TRS generally may hold assets and earn income that would not be qualifying assets or income if held or earned directly by a REIT. Both the subsidiary and the REIT must jointly elect to treat the subsidiary as a TRS. A corporation of which a TRS directly or indirectly owns more than 35% of the voting power or value of the stock will automatically be treated as a TRS. Overall, no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of stock or securities of one or more TRSs. In addition, the TRS rules limit the deductibility of interest paid or accrued by a TRS to its parent REIT to assure that the TRS is subject to an appropriate level of corporate taxation. The rules also impose a 100% excise tax on certain transactions between a TRS and its parent REIT that are not conducted on an arm’s-length basis.
Previous report
Any TRSs that we own will pay U.S. federal, state and local income tax on their taxable income, and their after-tax net income will be available for distribution to us but will not be required to be distributed to us. We will monitor the value of our investments in TRSs for the purpose of ensuring compliance with the rule that no more than 20% of the value of a REIT’s assets may consist of TRS securities (which is applied at the end of each calendar quarter). In addition, we will scrutinize all of our transactions with any TRSs for the purpose of ensuring that they are entered into on arm’s-length terms in order to avoid incurring the 100% excise tax described above. The value
Previous report
of the securities that we hold in TRSs may not be subject to precise valuation. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will be able to comply with the 20% REIT subsidiaries limitation or to avoid application of the 100% excise tax.
Previous report
Distributions to tax-exempt investors may be classified as unrelated business taxable income and tax-exempt investors would be required to pay tax on the unrelated business taxable income and to file income tax returns.
Previous report
Neither ordinary nor capital gain distributions with respect to our common stock nor gain from the sale of stock should generally constitute unrelated business taxable income to a tax-exempt investor. However, there are certain exceptions to this rule. In particular:
Previous report
We encourage you to consult your own tax advisor to determine the tax consequences applicable to you if you are a tax-exempt investor.
Previous report
Our charter provides that our board of directors may revoke or otherwise terminate our REIT election, without the approval of our stockholders, if it determines that it is no longer in our best interest to continue to qualify as a REIT. If we cease to qualify as a REIT, we would become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our taxable income and would no longer be required to distribute most of our taxable income to our stockholders, which may have adverse consequences on our total return to our stockholders.
Previous report
Complying with REIT requirements may limit our ability to hedge risk effectively.
Previous report
The REIT provisions of the Code may limit our ability to hedge the risks inherent to our operations. From time to time, we may enter into hedging transactions with respect to one or more of our assets or liabilities. Our hedging transactions may include entering into interest rate swaps, caps and floors, options to purchase these items, and futures and forward contracts. Any income or gain derived by us from transactions that hedge certain risks, such as the risk of changes in interest rates, will not be treated as gross income for purposes of either the 75% or the 95% income test if specific requirements are met. Such requirements include that the hedging transaction be properly identified within prescribed time periods and that the transaction either (1) hedges risks associated with indebtedness issued by us that is incurred to acquire or carry real estate assets or (2) manages the risks of currency fluctuations with respect to income or gain that qualifies under the 75% or 95% income test (or assets that generate such income). To the extent that we do not properly identify such transactions as hedges, hedge with other types of financial instruments, or hedge other types of indebtedness, the income from those transactions is not likely to be treated as qualifying income for purposes of the 75% and 95% income tests. As a result of these rules, we may have to limit the use of hedging techniques that might otherwise be advantageous, which could result in greater risks associated with interest rate or other changes than we would otherwise incur.
Previous report
A limit on the percentage of our securities a person may own may discourage a takeover or business combination, which could prevent our stockholders from realizing a premium price for their stock.
Previous report
Our charter restricts direct or indirect ownership by one person or entity to no more than 3.6% in value of the outstanding shares of our capital stock or 3.6% in number of shares or value, whichever is more restrictive, of the outstanding shares of our common stock unless exempted (prospectively or retroactively) by our board of directors. This restriction may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us, including an extraordinary transaction (such as a merger, tender offer or sale of all or substantially all of our assets) that might provide a premium price to our stockholders.
Reworded paragraphs (83)
Previous wording
Our success is dependent on our ability to make additional Investments consistent with our investment goals.
Current wording
Our success is dependent on our ability to make investments consistent with our investment goals.
Previous wording
We cannot provide prospective investors with any specific information as to the identification, location, operating histories, lease terms or other relevant economic and financial data regarding any Investments that we may make in the future. Our success is dependent on our ability to make Investments consistent with our investment goals, and a failure to do so is likely to materially and adversely affect returns to our stockholders.
Current wording
We cannot provide prospective investors with any specific information as to the types, identification, location, operating histories, lease terms or other relevant economic and financial data regarding any investments that we may make in the future. Our success is dependent on our ability to make investments consistent with our investment goals, and a failure to do so is likely to materially and adversely affect returns to our stockholders.
Previous wording
Our investment policies and strategies are very broad and permit us to invest in any type of commercial real estate, including developed and undeveloped properties, entities owning these assets or other real estate assets regardless of geographic location or property type. Our board of directors has absolute discretion in implementing these policies and strategies, subject to the restrictions on investment objectives and policies set forth in our articles of incorporation. Because you cannot evaluate our investments, an investment in our common stock may entail more risk than other types of companies. This additional risk may hinder your ability to achieve your own personal investment objectives related to portfolio diversification, risk-adjusted investment returns and other objectives.
Current wording
Our investment strategies are broad and unrestrictive. Our Board has absolute discretion in implementing these policies and strategies, subject to the restrictions on investment objectives and policies set forth in our articles of incorporation. Because you cannot evaluate our investments, an investment in our common stock may entail more risk than other types of companies. This additional risk may hinder your ability to achieve your own personal investment objectives related to portfolio diversification, risk-adjusted investment returns and other objectives.
Previous wording
Our future growth will depend upon our ability to acquire and lease properties in a competitive real estate business and to raise additional capital.
Current wording
Our future growth will depend upon our ability to raise additional capital and make investments in a competitive environment.
Previous wording
Our future growth will depend, in large part, upon our ability to acquire and lease properties and raise additional capital. In order to grow we need to continue to acquire and finance investment properties and sell non-core properties. We face significant competition with respect to our acquisition and origination of assets from many other companies, including other REITs, insurance companies, private investment funds, hedge funds, specialty finance companies and other investors. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, there is significant competition on a national, regional and local level with respect to property management services and in commercial real estate services generally, and we are subject to competition from large national and multi-national firms as well as local or regional firms that offer similar services to ours. Some of our competitors may have greater financial and operational resources, larger customer bases, and more established relationships with their customers and suppliers than we do. The competitive pressures we face, if not effectively managed, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Current wording
Our future growth will depend, in large part, upon our ability to raise additional capital and make investments that generate a return that is higher than our cost of capital. In order to grow we need to continue to sell non-core properties and acquire and finance properties suitable for our DST Program. We face significant competition with respect to our acquisition of assets from many other companies, including other REITs, insurance companies, private investment funds, hedge funds, specialty finance companies and other investors. Some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Some of our competitors may have greater financial and operational resources, larger customer bases, and more established relationships with their customers and suppliers than we do. The competitive pressures we face, if not effectively managed, may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.
Previous wording
We are presently a comparatively small company with a modest number of properties, resulting in a portfolio that lacks geographic and tenant diversity. While we intend to endeavor to grow and diversify our portfolio through additional property acquisitions, we may never reach a significant size to achieve true portfolio diversity.
Current wording
We are presently a comparatively small company with a modest number of investments, resulting in an investment portfolio that lacks diversity. While we intend to endeavor to grow and diversify our portfolio and sources of income through our DST Program, additional investments and real estate acquisitions, we may never reach a significant size to achieve true portfolio diversity.
Previous wording
If we acquire other property interests that are similarly large in relation to our overall size, our portfolio could become even more concentrated, increasing the risk of loss to stockholders if a default or other problem arises. Alternatively, property sales may reduce the aggregate amount of our property investment portfolio in value or number. As a result, our portfolio could become concentrated in larger assets, thereby reducing the benefits of diversification by geography, property type, tenancy or other measures.
Current wording
problem arises. Alternatively, property sales may reduce the aggregate amount of our property investment portfolio in value or number. As a result, our portfolio could become concentrated in larger assets, thereby reducing the benefits of diversification by geography, property type, tenancy or other measures.
Previous wording
If we cannot obtain additional capital, our ability to make acquisitions and lease properties will be limited. We are subject to risks associated with debt and capital stock issuances, and such issuances may have consequences to holders of shares of our common stock.
Current wording
If we cannot obtain additional capital, our ability to make acquisitions for our DST Program will be limited. We are subject to risks associated with debt and capital stock issuances and private placements of interests in our DST offerings, and such issuances may have consequences to holders of shares of our common stock.
Previous wording
Our ability to make acquisitions and lease properties will depend, in large part, upon our ability to raise additional capital. If we were to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity securities, we could dilute the interests of holders of shares of our common stock. Our board of directors may authorize the issuance of classes or series of preferred stock which may have rights that could dilute, or otherwise adversely affect, the interest of holders of shares our common stock.
Current wording
Our ability to make acquisitions for our DST Program will depend, in large part, upon our ability to raise additional capital. If we were to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity securities, we could dilute the interests of holders of shares of our
Previous wording
working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements, requiring the use of a portion of our cash flow from operations for the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures and general corporate requirements, and limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry.
Current wording
Further, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Such indebtedness could also have other important consequences to holders of the notes and holders of our common stock, including subjecting us to covenants restricting our operating flexibility, increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate requirements, requiring the use of a portion of our cash flow from operations for the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund working capital, acquisitions, capital expenditures and general corporate requirements, and limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and our industry.
Previous wording
The market for real estate investments is highly competitive.
Current wording
The market for real estate investments for our DST Program is highly competitive.
Previous wording
Identifying attractive real estate investment opportunities, particularly in the value-added real estate arena, is difficult and involves a high degree of uncertainty. Furthermore, the historical performance of a particular property or market is not a guarantee or prediction of the property’s or market’s future performance. There can be no assurance that we will be able to locate suitable acquisition opportunities or achieve our investment goals and objectives.
Current wording
Identifying attractive real estate investment opportunities for our DST Program is difficult and involves a high degree of uncertainty. Furthermore, the historical performance of a particular property or market is not a guarantee or prediction of the property’s or market’s future performance. There can be no assurance that we will be able to locate suitable acquisition opportunities or achieve our investment goals and objectives.
Previous wording
Because of the recent growth in demand for real estate investments, there may be increased competition among investors to invest in the same asset classes as our company. This competition may lead to an increase in the investment prices or otherwise less favorable investment terms. If this situation occurs with a particular Investment, our return on that Investment is likely to be less than the return it could have achieved if it had invested at a time of less investor competition for the Investment. For this and other reasons, we are under no restrictions concerning the timing of Investments.
Current wording
Because of the recent growth in demand for real estate investments, there may be increased competition among investors to invest in the same asset classes as our company. This competition may lead to an increase in the investment prices or otherwise less favorable investment terms. If this situation occurs with a particular real estate investment, our return on that real estate investment is likely to be less than the return it could have achieved if it had invested at a time of less investor competition for the real estate investment. For this and other reasons, we are under no restrictions concerning the timing of real estate investments.
Previous wording
Our real estate investments are subject to risks particular to real property.
Current wording
Real estate investments are subject to risks particular to real property.
Previous wording
If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce our return from an affected property or investment and reduce or eliminate our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Current wording
If any of these or similar events occur, it may reduce the return from an affected property or investment, negatively impact our ability to sell interests in the DST that holds such a real estate investment, and reduce or eliminate our ability to make distributions to stockholders.
Previous wording
There may be environmental problems associated with our properties which we were unaware of at the time of acquisition. The presence of hazardous substances may adversely affect our ability to sell real estate, including the affected property, or borrow using real estate as collateral. The presence of hazardous substances, if any, on our properties may cause us to incur substantial remediation costs, thus harming our financial condition. In addition, although our leases will generally require our tenants to operate in compliance with all applicable laws and to indemnify us against any environmental liabilities arising from a tenant’s activities on the property, we
Current wording
There may be environmental problems associated with our properties which we were unaware of at the time of acquisition. The presence of hazardous substances may adversely affect our ability to sell real estate, including the affected property, or borrow using real estate as collateral. The presence of hazardous substances, if any, on our properties may cause us to incur substantial remediation costs, thus harming our financial condition. In addition, although our leases will generally require our tenants to operate in compliance with all applicable laws and to indemnify us against any environmental liabilities arising from a tenant’s activities on the property, we nonetheless would be subject to strict liability by virtue of our ownership interest for environmental liabilities created by such tenants, and we cannot ensure the stockholders that any tenants we might have would satisfy their indemnification obligations under the applicable sales agreement or lease. The discovery of material environmental liabilities attached to such properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Previous wording
Under various U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims related to any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our security holders.
Current wording
knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require substantial expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. Certain environmental laws and common law principles could be used to impose liability for release of and exposure to hazardous substances, including asbestos-containing materials into the air, and third parties may seek recovery from owners or operators of real properties for personal injury or property damage associated with exposure to released hazardous substances. The cost of defending against claims of liability, of compliance with environmental regulatory requirements, of remediating any contaminated property, or of paying personal injury claims related to any contaminated property could materially adversely affect our business, assets or results of operations and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to our security holders.
Previous wording
We expect to primarily invest in properties as sole owner. However, we may, in our sole discretion subject to our investment guidelines, invest as a joint venture partner or co-investor in an Investment. In such event, we generally anticipate owning a controlling interest in the joint venture or co-investment vehicle. However, our joint venture partner or co-investor may have a consent or similar right with respect to certain major decisions with respect to an Investment, including a refinancing, sale or other disposition. Additionally, we may rely on our joint venture partner or co-investor to act as the property manager or developer, and, thus, our returns will be subject to the performance of our joint venture partner or co-investor. While we do not intend for these types of Investments to be a primary focus of our company, we may make such Investments in our sole discretion.
Current wording
We expect to primarily invest in properties as sole owner. However, we may, in our sole discretion, invest as a joint venture partner or co-investor in a real estate investment. In such event, we generally anticipate owning a controlling interest in the joint venture or co-investment vehicle. However, our joint venture partner or co-investor may have a consent or similar right with respect to certain major decisions with respect to a real estate investment, including a refinancing, sale or other disposition. Additionally, we may rely on our joint venture partner or co-investor to act as the property manager or developer, and, thus, our returns will be subject to the performance of our joint venture partner or co-investor. While we do not intend for these types of real estate investments to be a primary focus of our company, we may make such real estate investments in our sole discretion.
Previous wording
Adverse economic conditions may negatively affect our results of operations and, as a result, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders or to realize appreciation in the value of our Investments.
Current wording
Adverse economic conditions may negatively affect our results of operations and, as a result, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders or to realize appreciation in the value of our real estate investments.
Previous wording
Our operating results may be adversely affected by market and economic challenges, which may negatively affect our returns and profitability and, as a result, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders or to realize appreciation in the value of our Investments. These market and economic challenges include, but are not limited to, the following:
Current wording
Our operating results may be adversely affected by market and economic challenges, which may negatively affect our returns and profitability and, as a result, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders or to realize appreciation in the value of our real estate investments. These market and economic challenges include, but are not limited to, the following:
Previous wording
We may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic changes in the specific geographic areas where our Investments are concentrated.
Current wording
We may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic changes in the specific geographic areas where our real estate investments are concentrated.
Previous wording
Adverse conditions (including business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors) in the areas where our Investments are located and/or concentrated, and local real estate conditions (such as oversupply of, or reduced demand for, office, industrial, retail or multifamily properties) may have an adverse effect on the value of our Investments. A material decline in the demand or the ability of tenants to pay rent for office, industrial or retail space in these geographic areas may result in a material decline in our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Current wording
reduced demand for, office, industrial, retail or multifamily properties) may have an adverse effect on the value of our real estate investments. A material decline in the demand or the ability of tenants to pay rent for office, industrial or retail space in these geographic areas may result in a material decline in our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Previous wording
We may not be able to re-lease or renew leases at the Investments held by us on terms favorable to us or at all.
Current wording
We may not be able to re-lease or renew leases at the real estate investments held by us on terms favorable to us or at all.
Previous wording
We are subject to risks that upon expiration or earlier termination of the leases for space located at our Investments the space may not be re-leased or, if re-leased, the terms of the renewal or re-leasing (including the costs of required renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Any of these situations may result in extended periods where there is a significant decline in revenues or no revenues generated by an Investment. If we are unable to re-lease or renew leases for all or substantially all of the spaces at these Investments, if the rental rates upon such renewal or re-leasing are significantly lower than expected, if our reserves for these purposes prove inadequate, or if we are required to make significant renovations or concessions to tenants as part of the renewal or re-leasing process, we will experience a reduction in net income and may be required to reduce or eliminate distributions to our stockholders.
Current wording
We are subject to risks that upon expiration or earlier termination of the leases for space located at our real estate investments the space may not be re-leased or, if re-leased, the terms of the renewal or re-leasing (including the costs of required renovations or concessions to tenants) may be less favorable than current lease terms. Any of these situations may result in extended periods where there is a significant decline in revenues or no revenues generated by a real estate investment. If we are unable to re-lease or renew leases for all or substantially all of the spaces at these real estate investments, if the rental rates upon such renewal or re-leasing are significantly lower than expected, if our reserves for these purposes prove inadequate, or if we are required to make significant renovations or concessions to tenants as part of the renewal or re-leasing process, we will experience a reduction in net income and may be required to reduce or eliminate distributions to our stockholders.
Previous wording
We lease our properties to tenants, and we receive rents from our tenants during the terms of their respective leases. A tenant’s ability to pay rent is often initially determined by the creditworthiness of the tenant. However, if a tenant’s credit deteriorates, the tenant may default on its obligations under its lease and the tenant may also become bankrupt. The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants or other failure to pay is likely to adversely affect the income produced by our real estate investments. Any bankruptcy filings by or relating to one of our tenants could bar us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or its property, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. A tenant bankruptcy could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, we may not be able to evict the tenant solely because of such bankruptcy or failure to pay. A court, however, may authorize a tenant to reject and terminate its lease with us. In such a case, our claim against the tenant for unpaid, future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease. In addition, certain amounts paid to us within 90 days prior to the tenant’s bankruptcy filing could be required to be returned to the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. In any event, it is highly unlikely that a bankrupt or insolvent tenant would pay in full amounts it owes us under its lease. In other circumstances, where a tenant’s financial condition has become impaired, we may agree to partially or wholly terminate the lease in advance of the termination date in consideration for a lease termination fee that is likely less than the agreed rental amount. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a
Current wording
We lease our properties to tenants, and we receive rents from our tenants during the terms of their respective leases. A tenant’s ability to pay rent is often initially determined by the creditworthiness of the tenant. However, if a tenant’s credit deteriorates, the tenant may default on its obligations under its lease and the tenant may also become bankrupt. The bankruptcy or insolvency of our tenants or other failure to pay is likely to adversely affect the income produced by our real estate investments. Any bankruptcy filings by or relating to one of our tenants could bar us from collecting pre-bankruptcy debts from that tenant or its property, unless we receive an order permitting us to do so from the bankruptcy court. A tenant bankruptcy could delay our efforts to collect past due balances under the relevant leases and could ultimately preclude full collection of these sums. If a tenant files for bankruptcy, we may not be able to evict the tenant solely because of such bankruptcy or failure to pay. A court, however, may authorize a tenant to reject and terminate its lease with us. In such a case, our claim against the tenant for unpaid, future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease. In addition, certain amounts paid to us within 90 days prior to the tenant’s bankruptcy filing could be required to be returned to the tenant’s bankruptcy estate. In any event, it is highly unlikely that a bankrupt or insolvent tenant would pay in full amounts it owes us under its lease. In other circumstances, where a tenant’s financial condition has become impaired, we may agree to partially or wholly terminate the lease in advance of the termination date in consideration for a lease termination fee that is likely less than the agreed rental amount. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would have only a general unsecured claim for damages. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt entity may be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. We may recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims, which would harm our financial condition.
Previous wording
Lease defaults or terminations or landlord-tenant disputes may adversely reduce our income from our leased property portfolio.
Current wording
Lease defaults or terminations or landlord-tenant disputes may adversely reduce our income from leased properties.
Previous wording
We could be adversely affected by various facts and events related to our Investments over which we have limited or no control.
Current wording
We could be adversely affected by various facts and events related to our real estate investments over which we have limited or no control.
Previous wording
We could be adversely affected by various facts and events over which we have limited or no control, such as (i) oversupply of space and changes in market rental rates; (ii) economic or physical decline of the areas where the Investments are located; and (iii) deterioration of the physical condition of our Investments. Negative market conditions or adverse events affecting our existing or potential tenants, or the industries in which they operate, could have an adverse impact on our ability to attract new tenants, re-lease space, collect rent or renew leases, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Current wording
We could be adversely affected by various facts and events over which we have limited or no control, such as (i) oversupply of space and changes in market rental rates; (ii) economic or physical decline of the areas where the real estate investments are located; and (iii) deterioration of the physical condition of our real estate investments. Negative market conditions or adverse events affecting our existing or potential tenants, or the industries in which they operate, could have an adverse impact on our ability to attract new tenants, re-lease space, collect rent or renew leases, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Previous wording
An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds the policies on our Investments could subject us to lost capital or revenue on those properties.
Current wording
An uninsured loss or a loss that exceeds the policies on our real estate investments could subject us to lost capital or revenue on those properties.
Previous wording
Under the terms and conditions of the leases expected to be in force on our Investments, tenants are generally expected to be required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons, air, water, land or property, on or off the premises, due to activities conducted on the Investments, except for claims arising from the negligence or intentional misconduct of us or our agents. Additionally, tenants are generally expected to be required, at the tenants’ expense, to obtain and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and property damage insurance policies. Insurance policies for property damage are generally expected to be in amounts not less than the full replacement cost of the improvements less slab, foundations, supports and other customarily excluded improvements and insure against all perils of fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief and special extended perils (“all risk,” as that term is used in the insurance industry). Insurance policies are generally expected to be obtained by the tenant providing general liability coverage in varying amounts depending on the facts and circumstances surrounding the tenant and the industry in which it operates. These policies may include liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the properties and all of their appurtenant areas. To the extent that losses are uninsured or underinsured, we could be subject to lost capital and revenue on those Investments.
Current wording
and keep in full force during the term of the lease, liability and property damage insurance policies. Insurance policies for property damage are generally expected to be in amounts not less than the full replacement cost of the improvements less slab, foundations, supports and other customarily excluded improvements and insure against all perils of fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief and special extended perils (“all risk,” as that term is used in the insurance industry). Insurance policies are generally expected to be obtained by the tenant providing general liability coverage in varying amounts depending on the facts and circumstances surrounding the tenant and the industry in which it operates. These policies may include liability coverage for bodily injury and property damage arising out of the ownership, use, occupancy or maintenance of the properties and all of their appurtenant areas. To the extent that losses are uninsured or underinsured, we could be subject to lost capital and revenue on those real estate investments.
Previous wording
Acquired Investments may not meet projected occupancy.
Current wording
Acquired real estate investments may not meet projected occupancy.
Previous wording
If the tenants in an Investment do not renew or extend their leases or if tenants terminate their leases, the operating results of the Investment could be substantially and adversely affected by the loss of revenue and possible increase in operating expenses not reimbursed by the tenants. There can be no assurance that the Investments will be substantially occupied at projected rents. We will anticipate a minimum occupancy rate for each Investment, but there can be no assurance that the Investments will maintain the minimum occupancy rate or meet our anticipated lease-up schedule. In addition, lease-up of the unoccupied space may be achievable only at rental rates less than those we anticipate.
Current wording
If the tenants in a real estate investment do not renew or extend their leases or if tenants terminate their leases, the operating results of the real estate investment could be substantially and adversely affected by the loss of revenue and possible increase in operating expenses not reimbursed by the tenants. There can be no assurance that the real estate investments will be substantially occupied at projected rents. We will anticipate a minimum occupancy rate for each Investment, but there can be no assurance that the real estate investments will maintain the minimum occupancy rate or meet our anticipated lease-up schedule. In addition, lease-up of the unoccupied space may be achievable only at rental rates less than those we anticipate.
Previous wording
We could be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to Investments to which we take title.
Current wording
We could be exposed to environmental liabilities with respect to real estate investments to which we take title.
Previous wording
Federal, state and local laws impose liability on a landowner for releases or the otherwise improper presence on the premises of hazardous substances. This liability is without regard to fault for, or knowledge of, the presence of such substances. A landowner may be held liable for hazardous materials brought onto the property before it acquired title and for hazardous materials that are not discovered until after it sells the property. Similar liability may occur under applicable state law. If any hazardous materials are found within an Investment that are in violation of law at any time, we may be liable for all cleanup costs, fines, penalties and other costs. This potential liability will continue after we sell the Investment and may apply to hazardous materials present within the Investment before we acquired such Investment. If losses arise from hazardous substance contamination which cannot be recovered from a responsible party, the financial viability of that property may be substantially affected. It is possible that we will acquire an Investment with known or unknown environmental problems which may adversely affect us.
Current wording
Federal, state and local laws impose liability on a landowner for releases or the otherwise improper presence on the premises of hazardous substances. This liability is without regard to fault for, or knowledge of, the presence of such substances. A landowner may be held liable for hazardous materials brought onto the property before it acquired title and for hazardous materials that are not discovered until after it sells the property. Similar liability may occur under applicable state law. If any hazardous materials are found within a real estate investment that are in violation of law at any time, we may be liable for all cleanup costs, fines, penalties and other costs. This potential liability will continue after we sell the real estate investment and may apply to hazardous materials present within the real estate investment before we acquired such real estate investment. If losses arise from hazardous substance contamination which cannot be recovered from a responsible party, the financial viability of that property may be substantially affected. It is possible that we will acquire a real estate investment with known or unknown environmental problems which may adversely affect us.
Previous wording
Mold contamination has been linked to a number of health problems, resulting in recent litigation by tenants seeking various remedies, including damages and ability to terminate their leases. Originally occurring in residential property, mold claims have recently begun to appear in commercial properties as well. Several insurance companies have reported a substantial increase in mold-related claims, causing a growing concern that real estate owners might be subject to increasing lawsuits regarding mold contamination. No assurance can be given that a mold condition will not exist at one or more of our Investments, with the risk of substantial damages, legal fees and possibly loss of tenants. It is unclear whether such mold claims would be covered by the customary insurance policies to be obtained for us.
Current wording
Mold contamination has been linked to a number of health problems, resulting in recent litigation by tenants seeking various remedies, including damages and ability to terminate their leases. Originally occurring in residential property, mold claims have recently begun to appear in commercial properties as well. Several insurance companies have reported a substantial increase in mold-related claims, causing a growing concern that real estate owners might be subject to increasing lawsuits regarding mold contamination. No assurance can be given that a mold condition will not exist at one or more of our real estate investments, with the risk of substantial damages, legal fees and possibly loss of tenants. It is unclear whether such mold claims would be covered by the customary insurance policies to be obtained for us.
Previous wording
Significant restrictions on transfer and encumbrance of Investments are expected*.*
Current wording
Significant restrictions on transfer and encumbrance of real estate investments are expected*.*
Previous wording
The terms of any debt financing for an Investment are expected to prohibit the transfer or further encumbrance of that Investment or any interest in that Investment except with the lender’s prior consent, which consent each lender is expected to be able to withhold. The relative illiquidity of the Investments may prevent or substantially impair our ability to dispose of an Investment at times when it may be otherwise advantageous for us to do so. If we were forced to immediately liquidate some or all of our Investments, the proceeds are likely to result in a significant loss, if such a liquidation is possible at all.
Current wording
The terms of any debt financing for a real estate investment are expected to prohibit the transfer or further encumbrance of that real estate investment or any interest in that real estate investment except with the lender’s prior consent, which consent each lender is expected to be able to withhold. The relative illiquidity of the real estate investments may prevent or substantially impair our ability to dispose of a real estate investment at times when it may be otherwise advantageous for us to do so. If we were forced to immediately
Previous wording
We may be subject to the risk of liability and casualty loss as the owner of an Investment.
Current wording
We may be subject to the risk of liability and casualty loss as the owner of a real estate investment.
Previous wording
It is expected that we will maintain or cause to be maintained insurance against certain liabilities and other losses for an Investment, but the insurance obtained may not cover all amounts or types of loss. There is no assurance that any liability that may occur will be insured or that, if insured, the insurance proceeds will be sufficient to cover the loss. There are certain categories of loss that may be or may become uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as earthquakes, floods and hazardous waste.
Current wording
It is expected that we will maintain or cause to be maintained insurance against certain liabilities and other losses for a real estate investment, but the insurance obtained may not cover all amounts or types of loss. There is no assurance that any liability that may occur will be insured or that, if insured, the insurance proceeds will be sufficient to cover the loss. There are certain categories of loss that may be or may become uninsurable or not economically insurable, such as earthquakes, floods and hazardous waste.
Showing the first 40 of 83 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (10)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
If we acquire other property interests for either our DST Program or as a general investment that are similarly large in relation to our overall size, our portfolio could become even more concentrated, increasing the risk of loss to stockholders if a default or other
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
common stock. Our Board may authorize the issuance of classes or series of preferred stock which may have rights that could dilute, or otherwise adversely affect, the interest of holders of shares our common stock.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Under various U.S. federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. The costs of removal or remediation could be substantial. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Adverse conditions (including business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other factors) in the areas where our real estate investments are located and/or concentrated, and local real estate conditions (such as oversupply of, or
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Under the terms and conditions of the leases expected to be in force on our real estate investments, tenants are generally expected to be required to indemnify and hold us harmless from liabilities resulting from injury to persons, air, water, land or property, on or off the premises, due to activities conducted on the real estate investments, except for claims arising from the negligence or intentional misconduct of us or our agents. Additionally, tenants are generally expected to be required, at the tenants’ expense, to obtain
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
liquidate some or all of our real estate investments, the proceeds are likely to result in a significant loss, if such a liquidation is possible at all.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
We may finance our property acquisitions using interest-only mortgage indebtedness. During the interest-only period, the amount of each scheduled payment will be less than that of a traditional amortizing mortgage loan. The principal balance of the mortgage loan will not be reduced (except in the case of prepayments) because there are no scheduled monthly payments of principal during this period. After the interest-only period, we will be required either to make scheduled payments of amortized principal and interest or to
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
At any time, the U.S. federal income tax laws governing corporations or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended. We cannot predict when or if any new U.S. federal income tax law, regulation or administrative interpretation, or any
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Risks Related to our Financial Condition
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Volatility in global markets and changing political environments can cause fluctuations in the performance of the U.S. commercial real estate markets. Economic slowdowns of large economies outside the United States are likely to negatively impact growth of the U.S. economy. Political uncertainties both home and abroad may discourage business investment in real estate and other
Rearranged previous paragraphs (7)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Further, we may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Such indebtedness could also have other important consequences to holders of the notes and holders of our common stock, including subjecting us to covenants restricting our operating flexibility, increasing our vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions, limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Real estate investments are subject to risks particular to real property, including:
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
nonetheless would be subject to strict liability by virtue of our ownership interest for environmental liabilities created by such tenants, and we cannot ensure the stockholders that any tenants we might have would satisfy their indemnification obligations under the applicable sales agreement or lease. The discovery of material environmental liabilities attached to such properties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
general unsecured claim for damages. Any unsecured claim we hold against a bankrupt entity may be paid only to the extent that funds are available and only in the same percentage as is paid to all other holders of unsecured claims. We may recover substantially less than the full value of any unsecured claims, which would harm our financial condition.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Part of our investment strategy may involve entering into derivative or hedging contracts that could require us to fund cash payments in the future under certain circumstances, such as the early termination of the derivative agreement caused by an event of default or other
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
flow hedges on the forecasted interest payments on the debt obligation. Our objective in using interest rate caps is to limit our exposure to interest rate movements.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
litigation has often been brought against that company. Because of the potential volatility of our stock price, we may become the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.