Walker & Dunlop, Inc.

Previous wording

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company, and we conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our primary operating company.

Current wording

Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is a holding company, and we conduct the majority of our operations through Walker & Dunlop, LLC, our primary operating company. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we granted profit interest awards to certain non-executive employees of Walker & Dunlop, LLC to better align their incentive compensation with our goals. The profit interest awards allocate 15% of the income before taxes of a wholly owned subsidiary to these employees. The wholly owned subsidiary is focused on debt financing transactions closed by these employees and is part of our Capital Markets segment.

Previous wording

We originate and sell multifamily loans through the programs of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, and HUD, with which we have licenses and long-established relationships. We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on nearly all loans that we originate for the Agencies’ programs. We are approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender nationally, a Freddie Mac Optigo lender nationally for Conventional, Seniors Housing, Targeted Affordable Housing and Small Balance Loans, a HUD MAP lender nationally, a HUD LEAN lender nationally, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. We broker and service loans for many life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other institutional

Current wording

We originate and sell multifamily loans through the programs of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Ginnie Mae, and HUD, with which we have licenses and long-established relationships. We retain servicing rights and asset management responsibilities on nearly all loans that we originate for the Agencies’ programs. We are approved as a Fannie Mae DUS lender nationally, a Freddie Mac Optigo lender nationally for Conventional, Seniors Housing, Targeted Affordable Housing and Small Balance Loans, a HUD MAP lender nationally, a HUD LEAN lender nationally, and a Ginnie Mae issuer. We broker and service loans for many life insurance companies, commercial banks, and other institutional investors, in which cases we do not fund the loan but rather act as a loan broker. Fannie Mae recently announced that we ranked as its largest DUS lender in 2025, by loan deliveries, and Freddie Mac recently announced that we ranked as its 3 rd largest Freddie Mac lender in 2025, by loan deliveries. Our market share with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was 11.2% on a combined basis, by loan deliveries in 2025, compared to 10.7% in 2024. Additionally, we were the 5 th largest overall lender for HUD for its fiscal year ended September 30, 2025.

Previous wording

We recognize revenue when we make simultaneous commitments to originate a loan to a borrower and sell that loan to an investor. The revenues earned reflect the fair value attributable to loan origination fees, premiums on the sale of loans, net of any co-broker fees, and the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loans, net of any guaranty obligations retained. We also recognize revenue when we receive the origination fee from a brokered loan transaction. Other transaction-related sources of revenue include (i) net warehouse interest income we earn or expense we incur while the loan is held for sale, (ii) net warehouse interest income from loans held for investment while they are outstanding, (iii) sales commissions for brokering the sale of multifamily properties, and (iv) syndication and transaction-based asset management fees from our investment management activities.

Current wording

We recognize revenue when we make simultaneous commitments to originate a loan to a borrower and sell that loan to an investor. The revenues earned reflect the fair value attributable to loan origination fees, premiums on the sale of loans, net of any co-broker fees, and the fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with servicing the loans, net of any guaranty obligations retained. We also recognize revenue when we receive the origination fee from a brokered loan transaction. Other transaction-related sources of revenue include (i) net warehouse interest income we earn or expense we incur while the loan is held for sale, (ii) sales commissions for brokering the sale of multifamily and hospitality properties, and (iii) syndication and transaction-based asset management fees from our investment management activities.

Previous wording

We are currently not exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated concurrently with establishing the coupon rate for the loan. We also seek to mitigate the risk of a loan not closing. We have agreements in place with the Agencies that specify the cost of a failed loan delivery in the event we fail to deliver the loan to the investor. To protect us against such fees, we require a deposit from the borrower at rate lock that is typically more than the potential fee. The deposit is returned to the borrower only once the loan is closed. Any potential loss from a catastrophic change in the property condition while the loan is held for sale using warehouse facility financing is mitigated through property insurance equal to replacement cost. We are also protected contractually from an investor’s failure to purchase the loan. We have experienced a de minimis number of failed deliveries in our history and have incurred immaterial losses on such failed deliveries.

Current wording

We are currently not exposed to unhedged interest rate risk during the loan commitment, closing, and delivery process. The sale or placement of each loan to an investor is negotiated concurrently with establishing the coupon rate for the loan. We also seek to mitigate the risk of a loan not closing. We have agreements in place with the Agencies that specify the cost of a failed loan delivery in the event we fail to deliver the loan to the investor. To protect us against such fees, we require a deposit from the borrower at rate lock that is typically more than the potential fee. The deposit is returned to the borrower only once the loan is closed. Any potential loss from a catastrophic change in the property condition while the loan is held for sale using warehouse facility financing is mitigated through property insurance equal to replacement cost. We are also protected contractually from an investor’s failure to purchase the loan. We have experienced a de minimis number of failed deliveries in our history and have incurred insignificant losses on such failed deliveries.

Previous wording

We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original loan amount (subject to doubling or tripling if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $300 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $60 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss). For loans in excess of $300 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $300 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transactions. The full risk-sharing limit in prior years was less than $300 million. Accordingly, loans originated in those prior years were subject to risk-sharing at lower levels. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above. Our servicing fees for risk-sharing loans include compensation for the risk-sharing obligations and are substantially larger than the servicing fees we receive from Fannie Mae for loans with no risk-sharing obligations.

Current wording

We have risk-sharing obligations on substantially all loans we originate under the Fannie Mae DUS program. When a Fannie Mae DUS loan is subject to full risk-sharing, we absorb losses on the first 5% of the unpaid principal balance of a loan at the time of loss settlement, and above 5% we share a percentage of the loss with Fannie Mae, with our maximum loss capped at 20% of the original loan amount (subject to doubling or tripling if the loan does not meet specific underwriting criteria or if the loan defaults within 12 months of its sale to Fannie Mae). Our full risk-sharing is currently limited to loans up to $400 million, which equates to a maximum loss per loan of $80 million (such exposure would occur in the event that the underlying collateral is determined to be completely without value at the time of loss), updated from $300 million in the fourth quarter of 2025. For loans in excess of $400 million, we receive modified risk-sharing. We also may request modified risk-sharing at the time of origination on loans below $400 million, which reduces our potential risk-sharing losses from the levels described above if we do not believe that we are being fully compensated for the risks of the transactions. The full risk-sharing limit in prior years was less than $400 million. Accordingly, loans originated in those prior years were subject to risk-sharing at lower levels. In limited circumstances we have agreed, and may in the future agree, with Fannie Mae to increase our loss sharing up to 100% of a loan’s UPB in lieu of the risk-sharing agreement described above. Our servicing fees for risk-sharing loans include compensation for the risk-sharing obligations and are substantially larger than the servicing fees we receive from Fannie Mae for loans with no risk-sharing obligations.

Previous wording

Through WDIS, we offer property sales brokerage services to owners and developers of multifamily properties that are seeking to sell these properties. Through these property sales brokerage services, we seek to maximize proceeds and certainty of closure for our clients using our knowledge of the commercial real estate and capital markets and relying on our experienced transaction professionals. Our property sales services are offered in various regions throughout the United States and cover many major markets. We have added several property sales brokerage teams over the past few years and continue to seek to add other property sales brokers, with the goal of continuing to expand the depth and number of regions covered by our brokerage services.

Current wording

Through WDIS, we offer property sales brokerage services to owners and developers of multifamily and hospitality properties that are seeking to sell these properties. Through these property sales brokerage services, we seek to maximize proceeds and certainty of closure for our clients using our knowledge of the commercial real estate and capital markets and relying on our experienced transaction professionals. Our property sales services are offered in various regions throughout the United States and cover many major markets. We have added several property sales brokerage teams over the past few years and continue to seek to add other property sales brokers, with the goal of continuing to expand the depth and number of regions covered by our brokerage services.

Previous wording

We retain servicing rights on substantially all the loans we originate and sell and generate revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the placement fees on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees. Servicing fees set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan and are based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our Fannie Mae servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections. For loans serviced for Freddie Mac, the economic deterrent that reduces the risk of loan prepayment comes in the form of a defeasance requirement wherein the borrower is required to replace the prepaid loan with securities that offer an equivalent return.

Current wording

We retain servicing rights on substantially all the loans we originate and sell to Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and HUD, and generate revenues from the fees we receive for servicing the loans, from the placement fees on escrow deposits held on behalf of borrowers, and from other ancillary fees. Servicing fees are set at the time an investor agrees to purchase the loan and are generally paid monthly for the duration of the loan based on the unpaid principal balance of the loan. Our Fannie Mae servicing arrangements generally provide for prepayment protection in the event of a voluntary prepayment. For loans serviced for Freddie Mac, the economic deterrent that reduces the risk of loan prepayment comes in the form of a defeasance requirement wherein the borrower is required to replace the prepaid loan with securities that offer an equivalent return. We also service loans for many of the life insurance companies, conduits and private credit vehicles to which we broker loans. Our responsibilities for servicing brokered loans are limited to cashiering only, and typically earn lower servicing fees than our Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD loan servicing arrangements. For loans serviced outside of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and HUD, we typically do not have similar prepayment protections that reduce the risk of loan prepayment.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, our servicing portfolio was $135.3 billion, up 4% from December 31, 2023, which was the 7 th largest commercial/multifamily primary and master servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Mortgage Bankers’ Association’s (“MBA”) 2024 year-end survey (the “Survey”). Our servicing portfolio includes $68.2 billion of loans serviced for Fannie Mae and $39.2 billion for Freddie Mac, making us the 1 st and 6 th largest servicer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily loans in the nation, respectively, according to the

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, our servicing portfolio was $144.0 billion, up 6% from December 31, 2024, which was the 6 th largest commercial/multifamily primary and master servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Mortgage Bankers’ Association’s (“MBA”) 2025 year-end survey (the “Survey”). Our servicing portfolio includes $72.7 billion of loans serviced for Fannie Mae and $42.6 billion for Freddie Mac, making us the 1 st and 7 th largest servicer of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac multifamily loans in the nation, respectively, according to the Survey. Also included in our servicing portfolio is $11.6 billion of multifamily HUD loans, the 4 th largest HUD primary and servicing portfolio in the nation according to the Survey.

Previous wording

WDIP, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, is part of our strategy to grow and diversify the Company by growing our investment management platform. WDIP is a registered investment adviser and general partner of private commercial real estate investment funds focused on the management of debt, preferred equity, and mezzanine equity investments through private middle-market commercial real estate funds and separately managed accounts. WDIP’s current AUM of $2.3 billion primarily consist of eight sources: Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, Fund VII, Debt Fund I, and Debt Fund II (collectively, the “Funds”), and separate accounts managed for life insurance companies. AUM for the Funds and for the separate accounts consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fund raising and investment phases. AUM disclosed in this 10-K may differ from regulatory assets under management disclosed on WDIP’s Form ADV.

Current wording

WDIP is a registered investment adviser and general partner of private commercial real estate investment funds focused on the management of debt, preferred equity, and mezzanine equity investments through private middle-market commercial real estate funds and separately managed accounts. WDIP’s current AUM of $2.7 billion primarily consist of the “Funds”, separate accounts managed for life insurance companies and a preferred equity JV with a large Canadian pension fund. AUM for the Funds and for the separate accounts consists of both unfunded commitments and funded investments. Unfunded commitments are highest during the fund raising and investment phases. AUM disclosed in this 10-K may differ from regulatory assets under management disclosed on WDIP’s Form ADV.

Previous wording

WDIP typically receives management fees based on limited partner capital commitments, unfunded investment commitments, and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to Fund III, Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, and Fund VII, WDIP receives a percentage of the profits above the fund expenses and preferred return specified in the fund offering agreements.

Current wording

WDIP typically receives management fees based on limited partner capital commitments, unfunded investment commitments, and funded investments. Additionally, with respect to Fund IV, Fund V, Fund VI, and Fund VII, WDIP receives a percentage of the profits above the fund expenses and preferred return specified in the fund offering agreements, referred to as “carry” or “promote”. Unrealized carry is recognized based on the estimated fair value of the underlying investments, and realized carry is recognized when an investment is repaid and capital is returned to investors in the respective fund.

Previous wording

Through WDAE, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, we are the 8 th largest tax credit syndicator in the U.S., and an affordable housing developer through various joint venture partnerships. Affordable assets under management from our LIHTC operations is part of our strategy to grow our investment management platform and to strengthen our position in the affordable housing debt, equity, and property sales sector. We manage $15.9 billion of affordable AUM and have an established tax syndication and affordable housing development platform from which we earn investment management, syndication, and other LIHTC related fees.

Current wording

Through WDAE, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, we are the 9 th largest tax credit syndicator in the U.S., as measured by the number of Affordable units under management, and an affordable housing developer through various joint venture partnerships. Affordable assets under management from our LIHTC operations is part of our strategy to grow our investment management platform and to strengthen our position in the affordable housing debt, equity, and property sales sector. We manage $15.9 billion of affordable AUM and have an established tax syndication and affordable housing development platform from which we earn investment management, syndication, and other LIHTC related fees.

Previous wording

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Current wording

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include all of the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries, and all intercompany transactions have been eliminated. During the fourth quarter of 2025, we granted profit interest awards to certain non-executive employees of Walker & Dunlop, LLC to better align their incentive compensation with our goals. The profit interest awards allocate 15% of the income before taxes of a wholly owned subsidiary to these employees. The wholly owned subsidiary is focused on debt financing transactions closed by these employees and is part of our Capital Markets segment.

Previous wording

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates based on certain judgments and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions and the use of different judgments and assumptions may have a material impact on our results. The following critical accounting estimates involve significant estimation uncertainty that may have or is reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Additional information about our critical accounting estimates and other significant accounting policies is discussed in NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements.

Current wording

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which requires management to make estimates based on certain judgments and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and affect reported amounts. The estimates and assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors management believes to be reasonable. Actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions and the use of different judgments and assumptions may have a material impact on our results. The following critical accounting estimates involve significant estimation uncertainty that may have or is reasonably likely to have a material impact on our financial condition

Previous wording

Mortgage Servicing Rights. MSRs are recorded at fair value at loan sale. The fair value at loan sale is based on estimates of expected net cash flows associated with the servicing rights and takes into consideration an estimate of loan prepayment. Initially, the fair value amount is included as a component of the derivative asset fair value at the loan commitment date. The estimated net cash flows from servicing, which includes assumptions for discount rate, placement fees on escrow accounts (“placement fees”), prepayment speeds, and servicing costs, are discounted using a discounted cash flow model at a rate that reflects the credit and liquidity risk of the MSR over the estimated life of the underlying loan. The discount rates used throughout the periods presented for all MSRs were between 8-14% and varied based on the loan type. The life of the underlying loan is estimated giving consideration to the prepayment provisions in the loan and assumptions about loan behaviors around those provisions. Our model for MSRs assumes no prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment provisions and full prepayment of the loan at or near the point when the prepayment provisions have expired. The estimated net cash flows also include cash flows related to the future earnings from placement of escrow accounts associated with servicing the loans. We include a servicing cost assumption to account for our expected costs to service a loan. The estimated placement fee rate associated with servicing the loan increases estimated cash

Current wording

Mortgage Servicing Rights. MSRs are recorded at fair value at loan sale. The fair value at loan sale is based on estimates of expected net cash flows associated with the servicing rights and takes into consideration an estimate of loan prepayment. Initially, the fair value amount is included as a component of the derivative asset fair value at the loan commitment date. The estimated net cash flows from servicing, which includes assumptions for discount rate, placement fees on escrow accounts (“placement fees”), prepayment speeds, and servicing costs, are discounted using a discounted cash flow model at a rate that reflects the credit and liquidity risk of the MSR over the estimated life of the underlying loan. The discount rates used throughout the periods presented for all MSRs were between 8-14% and varied based on the loan type. The life of the underlying loan is estimated giving consideration to the prepayment provisions in the loan and assumptions about loan behaviors around those provisions. Our model for MSRs assumes no prepayment prior to the expiration of the prepayment provisions and full prepayment of the loan at or near the point when the prepayment provisions have expired. The estimated net cash flows also include cash flows related to the future earnings from placement of escrow accounts associated with servicing the loans. We include a servicing cost assumption to account for our expected costs to service a loan. The estimated placement fee rate associated with servicing the loan increases estimated cash flows, and the estimated future cost to service the loan decreases estimated future cash flows. The servicing cost assumption has had a de minimis impact on the estimate historically. We record an individual MSR asset for each loan at loan sale.

Previous wording

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of capitalized MSRs are developed internally and are periodically compared to assumptions used by other market participants. Due to the relatively few transactions in the multifamily MSR market and the lack of significant changes in assumptions by market participants, we have experienced limited volatility in the assumptions historically and do not expect to observe significant changes in the foreseeable future, including the assumption that most significantly impacts the estimate: the discount rate. We actively monitor the assumptions used and make adjustments when market conditions change, or other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. Over the past several years, we have adjusted the placement fee rate assumption several times to reflect the current and expected future earnings rate projected for the life of the MSR as the interest rate environment has experienced significant volatility over the past several years. A 100-basis point change in the discount rate would increase or decrease the capitalized MSRs for the year ended December 31, 2024 by 3%. A 200-basis point change in the discount rate would increase or decrease the capitalized MSRs for the year ended December 31, 2024 by 5%. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.

Current wording

The assumptions used to estimate the fair value of capitalized MSRs are developed internally and are periodically compared to assumptions used by other market participants. Due to the relatively few transactions in the multifamily MSR market and the lack of significant changes in assumptions by market participants, we have experienced limited volatility in the assumptions historically and do not expect to observe significant changes in the foreseeable future, including the assumption that most significantly impacts the estimate: the discount rate. We actively monitor the assumptions used and make adjustments when market conditions change, or other factors indicate such adjustments are warranted. Over the past several years, we have adjusted the placement fee rate assumption several times to reflect the current and expected future earnings rate projected for the life of the MSR as the interest rate environment has experienced significant volatility over the past several years. A 100-basis point change in the discount rate would increase or decrease the capitalized MSRs for the year ended December 31, 2025 by 4%. A 200-basis point change in the discount rate would increase or decrease the capitalized MSRs for the year ended December 31, 2025 by 7%. These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution as they do not include interplay among assumptions.

Previous wording

Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations. This reserve liability (referred to as “allowance”) for risk-sharing obligations relates to our Fannie Mae at-risk and Freddie Mac SBL servicing portfolios and is presented as a separate liability on our balance sheets. We record an estimate of the loss reserve for the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for all loans in these servicing portfolios. For those loans that are collectively evaluated, we use the weighted-average remaining maturity method (“WARM”). WARM uses an average annual loss rate that contains loss content over multiple vintages and loan terms and is used as a foundation for estimating the collective reserves. The average annual loss rate is applied to the estimated unpaid principal balance over the contractual term, adjusted for estimated prepayments and amortization to arrive at the allowance on loans that are collectively evaluated (“CECL allowance”). We currently use one year for our reasonable and supportable forecast period (“forecast period”) as we believe forecasts beyond one year are inherently less reliable. During the forecast period we apply an adjusted loss factor based on generally available economic and unemployment forecasts and a blended loss rate from historical periods that we believe reflect the forecasts. We revert to the historical loss rate over a one-year period on a straight-line basis. Over the past couple of years, the loss rate used in the forecast period has been updated to reflect our expectations of the economic conditions over the coming year in relation to the historical period. For example, over the past two years, we updated the loss rate used in the forecast period several times within a range of 2.1 basis points to 2.4 basis points. The forecast loss rate fluctuating within a tight range reflects our relatively unchanged view of the uncertainty of the evolving macroeconomic conditions facing the multifamily sector. We made multiple revisions to the loss rate used in the forecast period in the past, and those changes have significantly impacted the CECL reserve.

Current wording

Allowance for Risk-Sharing Obligations. This reserve liability (referred to as “allowance”) for risk-sharing obligations relates to our Fannie Mae at-risk and Freddie Mac SBL servicing portfolios and is presented as a separate liability on our balance sheets. We record an estimate of the loss reserve for the current expected credit losses (“CECL”) for all loans in these servicing portfolios. For those loans that are collectively evaluated, we use the weighted-average remaining maturity method (“WARM”). WARM uses an average annual loss rate that contains loss content over multiple vintages and loan terms and is used as a foundation for estimating the collective reserves. The average annual loss rate is applied to the estimated unpaid principal balance over the contractual term, adjusted for estimated prepayments and amortization to arrive at the allowance on loans that are collectively evaluated (“CECL allowance”). We currently use one year for our reasonable and supportable forecast period (“forecast period”) as we believe forecasts beyond one year are inherently less reliable. During the forecast period we apply an adjusted loss factor based on generally available economic and unemployment forecasts and a blended loss rate from historical periods that we believe reflect the forecasts. We revert to the historical loss rate over a one-year period on a straight-line basis. Over the past couple of years, the loss rate used in the forecast period has been updated to reflect our expectations of the economic conditions over the coming year in relation to the historical period. For example, over the past two years, we updated the loss rate used in the forecast period several times within a range of 2.1 basis points to 2.3 basis points. The forecast loss rate fluctuating within a tight range reflects our relatively unchanged view of the uncertainty of the evolving macroeconomic conditions facing the multifamily sector. We made multiple revisions to the loss rate used in the forecast period in the past, and those changes have significantly impacted the CECL reserve.

Previous wording

One of the key components of a WARM calculation is the runoff rate, which is the expected rate at which loans in the current portfolio will amortize and prepay in the future based on our historical prepayment and amortization experience. We group loans by similar origination dates (vintage) and contractual maturity terms for purposes of calculating the runoff rate. We originate loans under the DUS program with various terms generally ranging from several years to 15 years; each of these various loan terms has a different runoff rate. The runoff rates applied to each vintage and contractual maturity term are determined using historical data; however, changes in prepayment and amortization behavior may significantly impact the estimate. We have not experienced significant changes in the runoff rate since we implemented CECL in 2020.

Current wording

One of the key components of a WARM calculation is the runoff rate, which is the expected rate at which loans in the current portfolio will amortize and prepay in the future based on our historical prepayment and amortization experience. We group loans by similar origination dates (vintage) and contractual maturity terms for purposes of calculating the runoff rate. We originate loans under the DUS program with various terms generally ranging from several years to 15 years; each of these various loan terms has a different runoff rate. The runoff rates applied to each vintage and contractual maturity term are determined using historical data; however, changes in prepayment and amortization

Previous wording

The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a ten-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A ten-year lookback period is used as we believe this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. As the weighted-average annual loss rate utilizes a rolling ten-year look-back period, the loss rate used in the estimate will change as loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period continue to roll off as new loss data are added. For example, in the first quarter of 2024, loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period with significantly higher losses rolled off and were replaced with more recent loss data with fewer losses, resulting in the weighted-average historical annual loss rate changing from 0.6 basis points to 0.3 basis points.

Current wording

The weighted-average annual loss rate is calculated using a ten-year look-back period, utilizing the average portfolio balance and settled losses for each year. A ten-year lookback period is used as we believe this period of time includes sufficiently different economic conditions to generate a reasonable estimate of expected results in the future, given the relatively long-term nature of the current portfolio. As the weighted-average annual loss rate utilizes a rolling ten-year look-back period, the loss rate used in the estimate will change as loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period continue to roll off as new loss data are added. For example, in the first quarter of 2024, loss data from earlier periods in the look-back period with significantly higher losses rolled off and were replaced with more recent loss data with fewer losses, resulting in the weighted-average historical annual loss rate changing from 0.6 basis points to 0.3 basis points. Our historical loss rate over the past ten years is 0.2 basis points.

Previous wording

excess of cost over the identifiable net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit to which the acquisition relates. Goodwill is recognized as an asset and is reviewed for impairment annually as of October 1. Between annual impairment analyses, we perform an evaluation of recoverability, when events and circumstances indicate that it is more-likely-than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying value. Impairment testing requires an assessment of qualitative factors to determine if there are indicators of potential impairment, followed by, if necessary, an assessment of quantitative factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount rates and other factors.

Current wording

value. Impairment testing requires an assessment of qualitative factors to determine if there are indicators of potential impairment, followed by, if necessary, an assessment of quantitative factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, whether there has been a significant or adverse change in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset and/or significant or adverse changes in cash flow projections or earnings forecasts. These assessments require management to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates about projected cash flows, discount rates and other factors.

Previous wording

Due to the sustained challenging macroeconomic conditions related to a reporting unit, our projected cash flows for this reporting unit declined, resulting in goodwill impairment during 2024 of $33.0 million or 3.7% of the aggregate goodwill balance outstanding at the time. We attributed this goodwill impairment to one of the reporting units to which the GeoPhy operations and goodwill are assigned, which is a component of the Capital Markets segment. The remaining goodwill assigned to this reporting unit as of December 31, 2024 was $80.8 million.

Current wording

In 2022, we acquired GeoPhy, a software development company focused on data analytics and product development with a specific concentration in U.S. commercial real estate. As part of the acquisition, a significant portion of the transaction proceeds were contingent upon the achievement of performance-based hurdles tied to commercial real estate transaction volumes and associated revenues from the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2025. Due to the sustained challenging macroeconomic conditions in the U.S. commercial real estate sector from the date of the acquisition through December 31, 2025, outlined more fully inOverview of Current Business Environment, our projected cash flows for this reporting unit declined, resulting in goodwill impairment during 2024 of $33.0 million or 3.7% of the aggregate goodwill balance outstanding at the time. We attributed this goodwill impairment to one of the reporting units to which the GeoPhy operations and goodwill are assigned, which is a component of the Capital Markets segment.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, our assessment of the remaining goodwill at each of our other reporting units, totaling $787.9 million, indicates they are not impaired (NOTE 7 of the consolidated financial statements details the changes in the goodwill balance).

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, our assessment of the remaining goodwill at each of our reporting units indicates they are not impaired (NOTE 9 of the consolidated financial statements details the changes in the goodwill balance).

Previous wording

The commercial real estate (CRE) market, and in particular the multifamily sector is experiencing a challenging environment shaped by elevated interest rates that are directly impacting the cost and availability of capital, slower rent growth that is impacting growth expectations and asset valuations, and macroeconomic uncertainties that are impacting overall demand for transactions. Although these factors have all shown signs of improvement throughout 2024, indicating a recovery may be underway, these factors generally negatively impacted the commercial real estate transactions market throughout 2024.

Current wording

From 2022 through the first quarter of 2025, the commercial real estate (CRE) market, and in particular the multifamily sector experienced a challenging environment shaped by elevated interest rates that directly impacted the cost and availability of capital, slower rent growth that has impacted growth expectations and asset valuations, and macroeconomic uncertainties that impacted investors’ long-term outlook and overall demand for transactions.

Previous wording

research arm, reporting national rent growth of approximately 2% in 2024, a pace that is far below the aggressive rent growth seen in 2021 and 2022. According to MSCI, in December 2024, multifamily property prices remained stable month-over-month but were down 4.2% compared to the previous year. Notably, multifamily prices have declined by 19.6% from their peak, but remain 11.9% above pre-COVID January 2020 levels.

Current wording

Zelman, our housing research business, reporting national rent growth of 1.3% in 2025. According to MSCI, in December 2025, multifamily property prices remained stable month-over-month but were down 1.3% year over year, which compares to a year over year decline of 4.2% the previous year. Notably, multifamily prices are estimated to have declined by 19.7% from peak levels in 2022 but remain 11.5% above pre-COVID January 2020 levels.

Previous wording

Despite the current headwinds, multifamily remains one of the most resilient asset classes in CRE. Market participants are adjusting to current conditions and we expect the market to continue recovering and transaction activity to continue to increase. Improving conditions in the second half of 2024 led to increased transaction volumes across nearly all aspects of our business during 2024, which surged to $39.9 billion with notable increases in Brokered (37%), GSE (11%) and property sales (11%) transaction volumes compared to last year. Consequently, our Capital Markets segment produced net income of $66.7 million in 2024, up 62% compared to 2023.

Current wording

Multifamily remains one of the most resilient asset classes in CRE. Market participants are adjusting to current conditions and we expect the market to continue recovering and transaction activity to continue to increase. Improving conditions in the second half of 2025 led to increased transaction volumes across nearly all aspects of our business during 2025, which surged to $54.8 billion with notable increases in Brokered (37%), GSE (38%) and property sales (37%) transaction volumes compared to last year. Consequently, our Capital Markets segment produced net income of $89.8 million in 2025, up 35% compared to 2024.

Previous wording

Our Servicing & Asset Management segment is not directly correlated to the transaction markets like our Capital Markets segment. This segment’s total managed portfolio of $153.7 billion as of December 31, 2024 was up 4% from December 31, 2023, and included our $135.3 billion loan servicing portfolio and our $18.4 billion of assets under management. Total revenues for the segment grew 5%, to $591.6 million, while net income decreased 5%, to $157.8 million, in 2024 compared to 2023, although net income showed signs of improvement in the fourth quarter of 2024 compared to 2023. The revenues from the servicing portfolio have benefitted from higher short-term interest rates. We hold escrow deposits on behalf of our servicing portfolio and place those deposits with large, multinational banks that earn close to Fed Funds. We expect these revenues to decline moving forward as the FOMC eventually reduces interest rates. Over the past two years, we have shifted our focus to scaling our assets under management, and in the fourth quarter of 2024 we successfully closed a first round of $200 million of equity capital for Debt Fund II from life insurance companies, pension funds, high net worth investors and Walker & Dunlop. Debt Fund II will provide our investment management team with over $500 million of levered capital to deploy into transitional multifamily assets. We expect the revenues of our investment management business to grow as capital is raised and deployed. This segment also includes the activities of WDAE, an alternative investment manager focused on affordable housing, including LIHTC syndication and joint venture development. We ranked as the eighth largest LIHTC syndicator in 2024 and continue to pursue combined LIHTC syndication and affordable housing services to generate significant long-term financing, property sales, and syndication opportunities. We expect the revenues for WDAE to remain fairly stable moving forward, as the realization revenues from our historical LIHTC investments are tied to the underlying value of the affordable assets, and we do not expect a material increase in the value of affordable assets in the near term due to the aforementioned macroeconomic challenges facing the commercial real estate sector.

Current wording

Our Servicing & Asset Management segment is not directly correlated to the transaction markets like our Capital Markets segment. This segment’s total managed portfolio of $162.6 billion as of December 31, 2025 was up 6% from December 31, 2024, and included our $144.0 billion loan servicing portfolio and our $18.6 billion of AUM. Total revenues for the segment decreased 4%, to $566.6 million, while net income decreased 46%, to $85.1 million, in 2025 compared to 2024, with net income decreasing in the fourth quarter of 2025 compared to 2024. We hold escrow deposits on behalf of our servicing portfolio and place those deposits with large, multinational banks that earn close to the Federal funds rate. Revenues from those escrow deposits have benefitted over the last several years from higher short-term interest rates, but we have begun to see declines in those revenues as the FOMC has eased monetary policy and adjusted short-term rates downward. We expect that trend to continue, but moderate, in 2026 as the FOMC may slow the pace, and rate, of interest rate reductions. We have increased our focus on scaling our assets under management, and in the fourth quarter of 2024 we successfully closed a first round of $200 million of equity capital for Debt Fund II from life insurance companies, pension funds, high net worth investors and a co-investment from Walker & Dunlop. The initial closing provided our investment management team with over $500 million of levered capital, of which approximately $490 million was deployed into transitional multifamily assets in 2025. We continue to actively raise capital for Debt Fund II, and we expect the revenues of our investment management business to grow as that capital is raised and deployed. This segment also includes the activities of WDAE, an alternative investment manager focused on affordable housing, including LIHTC syndication and joint venture development. We ranked as the ninth largest LIHTC syndicator in 2025 and continue to pursue combined LIHTC syndication and affordable housing services to generate significant long-term financing, property sales, and syndication opportunities. We expect the revenues for WDAE to remain fairly stable moving forward, as the realization revenues from our historical LIHTC investments are tied to the underlying value of the affordable assets, and we do not expect a material increase in the value of affordable assets in the near term due to the aforementioned macroeconomic challenges facing the commercial real estate sector.

Previous wording

Premiums received on the sale of a loan result when a loan is sold to an investor for more than its face value. There are various reasons investors may pay a premium when purchasing a loan. For example, the fixed rate on the loan may be higher than the rate of return required by an investor or the characteristics of a particular loan may be desirable to an investor. We do not receive premiums on brokered loans, since we do not originate the loan.

Current wording

Premiums received on the sale of a loan result when a loan is sold to an investor for more than its face value. There are various reasons investors may pay a premium when purchasing a loan. For example, the fixed rate on the loan may be higher than the rate of return required by an investor or the characteristics of a particular loan may be desirable to an investor. We do not receive premiums on brokered loans, since we are not the lender.

Previous wording

*Fair Value of Expected Net Cash Flows from Servicing, net.*Revenue related to expected net cash flows from servicing is recognized at the loan commitment date, similar to the loan origination fees, as described above. The derivative asset is recognized at fair value, which reflects the estimated fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, reduced by the estimated fair value of any guaranty obligations to be assumed. MSRs and guaranty obligations are recognized as assets and liabilities, respectively, upon the sale of the loans.

Current wording

*Fair Value of Expected Net Cash Flows from Servicing, net of Guaranty Obligation.*Revenue related to expected net cash flows from servicing is recognized at the loan commitment date, similar to the loan origination fees, as described above. The derivative asset is recognized at fair value, which reflects the estimated fair value of the expected net cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan, reduced by the estimated fair value of any guaranty obligations to be assumed. MSRs and guaranty obligations are recognized as assets and liabilities, respectively, upon the sale of the loans.

Previous wording

Servicing Fees. We service nearly all loans we originate and some loans we broker. We earn servicing fees for performing certain loan servicing functions such as processing loan, tax, and insurance payments and managing escrow balances. Servicing generally also includes asset management functions, such as monitoring the physical condition of the property, analyzing the financial condition and liquidity of the borrower, and performing loss mitigation activities as directed by the Agencies.

Current wording

Servicing Fees. We service nearly all loans we originate for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, HUD, and some loans we broker. We earn servicing fees for performing certain loan servicing functions such as processing loan, tax, and insurance payments and managing escrow balances. Servicing generally also includes asset management functions, such as monitoring the physical condition of the property, analyzing the financial condition and liquidity of the borrower, and performing loss mitigation activities as directed by the Agencies.

Previous wording

*Investment Management Fees.*We manage invested capital from third-party investors through an investment fund structure. The capital placed into the investment fund is utilized to make investments in commercial real estate investment opportunities, primarily as equity in commercial real estate operating partnerships or LIHTC-generating multifamily properties. Additionally, we may utilize the capital to fund debt financing opportunities through certain investment funds, primarily to multifamily owner-operators. We earn an investment management or asset management fee based on a contractual percentage of the invested capital. For market-rate investments, we earn and collect the investment management fees through the returns of the investment funds. For LIHTC investments, we collect the asset management fees (“AMF”) through the combination of current payments and asset dispositions. NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements provides additional details of the accounting for AMF revenues.

Current wording

*Investment Management Fees.*We manage invested capital from third-party investors through an investment fund structure. The capital placed into the investment fund is utilized to make investments in commercial real estate investment opportunities, primarily as equity in commercial real estate operating partnerships or LIHTC-generating multifamily properties. Additionally, we may utilize the capital to fund debt financing opportunities through certain investment funds, primarily to multifamily owner-operators. We earn an investment management

Previous wording

Provision (benefit) for credit losses. The provision (benefit) for credit losses consists primarily of the provision associated with our risk-sharing loans, including pre-securitized Freddie Mac SBL loans. The provision (benefit) for credit losses associated with risk-sharing loans is estimated on a collective basis when a loan is sold to Fannie Mae and is based on our current expected credit losses on the current portfolio from loan sale to maturity. When a loan is probable of default (in foreclosure) and thus collateral dependent, the loan is taken out of the collective evaluation and individually evaluated for credit losses. Our estimates of property fair value are based on appraisals, broker opinions of value, or net operating income and market capitalization rates, whichever we believe is the best estimate of the net disposition value. Also included is a provision (benefit) for loan and other credit losses related to indemnified Agency loans. Given the nature and performance of these loans, we individually evaluate these loans for credit losses as described above.

Current wording

Provision (benefit) for credit losses. The provision (benefit) for credit losses consists primarily of the provision associated with our risk-sharing loans, including pre-securitized Freddie Mac SBL loans. The provision (benefit) for credit losses associated with risk-sharing loans is estimated on a collective basis when a loan is sold to Fannie Mae and is based on our current expected credit losses on the current portfolio from loan sale to maturity. When a loan is probable of default (in foreclosure) and thus collateral dependent, the loan is taken out of the collective evaluation and individually evaluated for credit losses. Our estimates of property fair value are based on appraisals, broker opinions of value, or net operating income and market capitalization rates, whichever we believe is the best estimate of the net disposition value.

Previous wording

The “Critical Accounting Estimates” section above and NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements provide additional details of the accounting for the provision (benefit) for credit losses.

Current wording

The “Critical Accounting Estimates” section above and NOTE 2 of the consolidated financial statements provide additional details of the accounting for the provision (benefit) for credit losses associated with our at-risk servicing portfolio.

Previous wording

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include facilities costs, travel and entertainment costs, marketing costs, professional fees, losses on debt extinguishment, accretion of contingent consideration liabilities, corporate insurance premiums, software costs, and other general and administrative expenses.

Current wording

Other operating expenses. Other operating expenses include facilities costs, travel and entertainment costs, marketing costs, professional fees, accretion of contingent consideration liabilities, corporate insurance premiums, software costs, and other general and administrative expenses.

Previous wording

Income tax expense. The Company is a C-corporation subject to federal, state, and international corporate tax. Our estimated combined statutory federal, state, and international tax rate was 25.1%, 26.1%, and 26.1% for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, respectively. Except for the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform”), our combined statutory tax rate has historically not varied significantly as the only material difference in the calculation of the combined statutory tax rate from year to year is the apportionment of our taxable income amongst the various states where we are subject to taxation since our foreign operations are (i) immaterial and (ii) taxed at a rate similar to our blended federal and state tax rate. Absent additional significant legislative changes to statutory tax rates (particularly the federal tax rate), we expect low deviation from the 2024 combined statutory tax rate for future years. However, we do expect some variability in the effective tax rate going forward due to excess tax benefits recognized and limitations on the deductibility of certain book expenses as a result of Tax Reform, primarily related to executive compensation.

Current wording

Income tax expense. The Company is a C-corporation subject to federal, state, and international corporate tax. Our estimated combined statutory federal, state, and international tax rate was 25.1%, 25.1%, and 26.1% for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, respectively. Except for the effects of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Reform”), our combined statutory tax rate has historically not varied significantly as the only material difference in the calculation of the combined statutory tax rate from year to year is the apportionment of our taxable income among the various states where we are subject to taxation since our foreign operations are (i)insignificantand (ii) taxed at a rate similar to our blended federal and state tax rate. Absent additional significant legislative changes to statutory tax rates (particularly the federal tax rate), we expect low deviation from the 2025 combined statutory tax rate for future years. However, we do expect some variability in the effective tax rate going forward due to excess tax benefits and shortfalls recognized and limitations on the deductibility of certain book expenses as a result of Tax Reform, primarily related to executive compensation.

Previous wording

The increase in expenses was due to increases in personnel costs, amortization and depreciation, provision (benefit) for credit losses, other operating expenses, and lower fair value adjustments to contingent consideration liabilities, partially offset by lower goodwill impairment. Personnel costs increased, largely due to increases in variable compensation costs for our salespeople as a result of our higher transaction volumes and subjective bonus compensation due to our improved financial performance. Amortization and depreciation increased largely due to the write-off of intangible assets related to the pending sale of a portfolio of assets by our LIHTC subsidiary combined with a smaller increase inamortization of MSRs. Provision (benefit) for credit losses changed from a benefit to a provision, primarily due to provision for losses related to repurchased loans. Other operating expenses increased largely as a result of increased travel and entertainment mostly related to our all-company meeting, with no comparable activity in 2023, software costs associated with automation efforts, and expenses associated with repurchased loans. Additionally, the results for 2023 include the write off of unamortized premium from corporate debt repayment, which reduced other operating expenses, with no comparable activity in 2024. Fair value adjustments to contingent consideration decreased due to the larger adjustments in 2023 due to the challenging market conditions related to one of our reporting units that impacted the estimated fair

Current wording

The increase in expenses was due to increases in personnel costs, indemnified and repurchased loan expenses, and asset impairments and other expenses, and lower fair value adjustments to contingent consideration liabilities, partially offset by lower goodwill impairment, and a decrease in interest expense on corporate debt. Personnel costs increased, largely due to increases in variable compensation costs for our salespeople as a result of our higher transaction volumes and salaries and benefits due to higher average headcount. Indemnified and repurchased loan expenses increased due to increases in loan repurchase losses and repurchased loan operating costs. Asset impairments and other expenses increased largely due to our strategic decision to sell asset management contracts and interests in assets held within one of our affordable operating subsidiaries. The expected sales prices were below current carrying values in many instances resulting in an impairment loss. There was also an increase in write off of unamortized premium from corporate debt repayment. Interest expense on corporate debt decreased due to lower average interest rates during 2025 compared to 2024, partially offset by an increase in the balance outstanding from the refinancing of our debt. Goodwill impairment decreased due to an impairment in 2024 with no comparable activity in 2025. Fair value adjustments to contingent consideration decreased primarily due to a larger adjustment in 2024 due to the challenging market conditions related to one of our reporting units that impacted the estimated fair value of future earnout payments without a similar adjustment to the earnout for that reporting unit in 2025.

Previous wording

To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, readers should use adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, interest expense on our corporate debt, and amortization and depreciation, adjusted for provision (benefit) for credit losses, net write-offs based on the final resolution of the defaulted loans or collateral, stock-based incentive compensation charges, the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net, the write off of unamortized balance of premium associated with the repayment of a portion of our corporate debt, the gain from revaluation of a previously held equity-method investment, goodwill impairment, and contingent consideration liability fair value adjustments when the fair value adjustment is a triggering event for a goodwill impairment assessment. In cases where the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities is a trigger for goodwill impairment, the goodwill impairment is netted against the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities and included as a net number. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for adjusted EBITDA may also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges that are used to determine compliance with financial covenants.

Current wording

To supplement our financial statements presented in accordance with GAAP, we use adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. The presentation of adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for, or superior to, the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with GAAP. When analyzing our operating performance, readers should use adjusted EBITDA in addition to, and not as an alternative for, net income. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before income taxes, interest expense on our corporate debt, and amortization and depreciation, adjusted for provision (benefit) for credit losses, net write-offs based on the final resolution of the defaulted loans or collateral, loan repurchase losses, stock-based compensation, the fair value of expected net cash flows from servicing, net of guaranty obligation, the write off of unamortized balance of deferred issuance costs associated with the repayment of a portion of our corporate debt, goodwill impairment, and contingent consideration liability fair value adjustments when the fair value adjustment is a triggering event for a goodwill impairment assessment. In cases where the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities is a trigger for goodwill impairment, the goodwill impairment is netted against the fair value adjustment of contingent consideration liabilities and included as a net number. Because not all companies use identical calculations, our presentation of adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Furthermore, adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for our management’s discretionary use, as it does not reflect certain cash requirements such as tax and debt service payments. The amounts shown for adjusted EBITDA may also differ from the amounts calculated under similarly titled definitions in our debt instruments, which are further adjusted to reflect certain other cash and non-cash charges that are used to determine compliance with financial covenants.

Previous wording

We believe that adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and that adjusted EBITDA should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with net income.

Current wording

We believe that adjusted EBITDA has limitations in that it does not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP and that adjusted EBITDA should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with net income on both a consolidated and segment basis. Adjusted EBITDA is reconciled to net income as follows:

Previous wording

The increase in origination fees was primarily related to an increase in the overall debt financing volumes year over year. Servicing fees increased mainly due to an increase in the average servicing portfolio. Property sales broker fees increased largely as a result of an increase in property sales volume year over year. Investment management fees decreased primarily due to a decline in asset management fees from our LIHTC operations due to the sustained challenging market conditions. Placement fees and other interest income increased primarily as a result

Current wording

The increase in origination fees was primarily related to an increase in the overall debt financing volumes year over year. Servicing fees

Previous wording

Our cash flows from operating activities are generated from loan sales, servicing fees, placement fees, net warehouse interest income, property sales broker fees, investment management fees, research subscription fees, investment banking advisory fees, and other income, net of loan origination and operating costs. Our cash flows from operating activities are impacted by the fees generated by our loan originations and property sales, the timing of loan closings, and the period of time loans are held for sale in the warehouse loan facility prior to delivery to the investor.

Current wording

Our cash flows from operating activities are generated from loan sales, servicing fees, placement fees, net warehouse interest income (expense), property sales broker fees, investment management fees, research subscription fees, investment banking advisory fees, and other income, net of loan origination and operating costs. Our cash flows from operating activities are impacted by the fees generated by our loan originations and property sales, the timing of loan closings, and the period of time loans are held for sale in the warehouse loan facility prior to delivery to the investor.

Previous wording

We usually lease facilities and equipment for our operations. Our cash flows from investing activities also include the funding and repayment of loans held for investment, including repurchased loans, contributions to and distributions from joint ventures, purchases of equity-method investments, and the purchase of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities pledged to Fannie Mae.

Current wording

We usually lease facilities and equipment for our operations. Our cash flows from investing activities include the funding and repayment of loans held for investment, including repurchased loans, contributions to and distributions from joint ventures, purchases of equity-method investments, cash paid for acquisitions, and the purchase of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities pledged to Fannie Mae.

Previous wording

We use our warehouse loan facilities and, when necessary, our corporate cash to fund loan closings, both for loans held for sale and loans held for investment. We believe that our current warehouse loan facilities are adequate to meet our loan origination needs. Historically, we used a combination of long-term debt and cash flows from operating activities to fund large acquisitions. Additionally, we repurchase shares, pay cash dividends, make long-term debt principal payments, and repay short-term borrowings on a regular basis. We issue stock primarily in connection with the exercise of stock options and for acquisitions (non-cash transactions).

Current wording

We use our warehouse loan facilities and, when necessary, our corporate cash to fund loan closings, both for loans held for sale and loans held for investment. We believe that our current warehouse loan facilities are adequate to meet our loan origination needs. Historically, we used a combination of long-term debt and cash flows from operating activities to fund large acquisitions. Additionally, we repurchase shares, pay cash dividends, make long-term debt principal payments, and repay short-term borrowings on a regular basis. We issue stock primarily in connection with the exercise of stock options and occasionally for acquisitions (non-cash transactions).