Farmland Partners Inc.

Previous wording

Our primary strategic objective is to utilize our position as a leading institutional acquirer, owner and manager of high-quality farmland located in agricultural markets throughout North America to deliver strong risk adjusted returns to investors through a combination of cash dividends and asset appreciation. As of December 31, 2024, we owned farms with an aggregate of approximately 93,500 acres in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas and West Virginia. In addition, as of December 31, 2024, we owned land and buildings for four agriculture equipment dealerships in Ohio leased to Ag Pro under the John Deere brand and served as property manager for approximately 48,300 acres of farmland, including farms in Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Ohio and South Carolina. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 60% of our portfolio (by value) was used to grow primary crops, such as corn, soybeans, wheat, rice and cotton, and approximately 40% was used to produce specialty crops, such as almonds, pistachios, citrus, avocados, strawberries, and edible beans. We believe our portfolio gives investors the economic benefit of increasing global food demand in the face of growing scarcity of high-quality farmland and will continue to reflect the approximate allocation of U.S. agricultural output between primary crops and animal protein (whose production relies principally on primary crops as feed), on one hand, and specialty crops, on the other.

Current wording

Our primary strategic objective is to utilize our position as a leading institutional acquirer, owner and manager of high-quality farmland located in agricultural markets throughout North America to deliver strong risk adjusted returns to investors through a combination of cash dividends and asset appreciation. As of December 31, 2025, we owned farms with an aggregate of approximately 71,600 acres in Arkansas, California, Colorado, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Missouri, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas and West Virginia. In addition, as of December 31, 2025, we owned land and buildings for four agriculture equipment dealerships in Ohio leased to Ag Pro under the John Deere brand. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 60% of our portfolio (by value) was used to grow primary crops, such as corn, soybeans, wheat, rice and cotton, and approximately 40% was used to produce specialty crops, such as almonds, pistachios, citrus, avocados, strawberries, and edible beans. We believe our portfolio gives investors the economic benefit of increasing global food demand in the face of growing scarcity of high-quality farmland and will continue to reflect the approximate allocation of U.S. agricultural output between primary crops and animal protein (whose production relies principally on primary crops as feed), on one hand, and specialty crops, on the other.

Previous wording

In addition, under the FPI Loan Program, we make loans to third-party farmers (both tenant and non-tenant) and landowners to provide financing for property acquisitions, working capital requirements, operational farming activities, farming infrastructure projects and for other farming, agricultural and other real estate related projects.

Current wording

In addition, under the FPI Loan Program, we make loans to landowners with whom we have established relationships and third-party farmers (both tenant and non-tenant) to provide financing for business operations, property acquisitions, working capital requirements, operational farming activities, farming infrastructure projects and non-farming business needs.

Previous wording

FPI was incorporated in Maryland on September 27, 2013, and is the sole member of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, which is a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 27, 2013. All of FPI’s assets are held by, and its operations are primarily conducted through, the Operating Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2024, FPI owned 97.5% of the Common units and none of the Series A preferred units. See “Note 9—Stockholders’ Equity and Non-controlling Interests” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the non-controlling interests.

Current wording

FPI was incorporated in Maryland on September 27, 2013, and is the sole member of the sole general partner of the Operating Partnership, which is a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on September 27, 2013. All of FPI’s assets are held by, and its operations are primarily conducted through, the Operating Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries. As of December 31, 2025, FPI owned 98.1% of the Common units and none of the Series A preferred units. See “Note 9—Stockholders’ Equity and Non-controlling Interests” within the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding the non-controlling interests.

Previous wording

During 2024, we completed dispositions consisting of 54 properties in the Corn Belt, Delta and South, High Plains and Southeast regions. We received $312.0 million in aggregate consideration, and recognized an aggregate gain on sale of $54.1 million, including $2.1 million in connection with properties sold in 2023 for which the gain was deferred.

Current wording

During 2025, we completed dispositions consisting of 60 properties in the Corn Belt, Delta and South, High Plains and West Coast regions. We received $90.2 million in aggregate consideration, including $2.1 million in seller financing, and recognized an aggregate net gain on sale of $34.9 million. The 60 property dispositions include 23 properties that were exchanged for the redemption and cancellation of 31,000 Series A preferred units (see “Exchange of Properties for Series A Preferred Units” below for more information).

Previous wording

During 2024, we completed acquisitions consisting of four properties in the Corn Belt and Delta and South regions. Aggregate cash consideration for these acquisitions totaled $17.9 million.

Current wording

During 2025, we completed acquisitions consisting of six properties in the Corn Belt region. Aggregate consideration for these acquisitions was $7.3 million.

Previous wording

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we repurchased 2,240,295 shares of our common stock at a weighted average price of $12.25 per share. As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $55.8 million of capacity remaining under the stock repurchase plan.

Current wording

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 3,411,581 shares of our common stock at a weighted average price of $11.07 per share under our share repurchase program. As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately

Previous wording

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we reduced our overall indebtedness by $158.5 million, largely with proceeds from the asset dispositions described above, resulting in an increase in liquidity.

Current wording

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we reduced our overall indebtedness by $43.0 million, largely with proceeds from the asset dispositions described above, resulting in an increase in liquidity.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had access to liquidity of $245.8 million, consisting of $78.4 million in cash and $167.4 million in undrawn availability under our credit facilities with Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Farmer Mac Mortgage Securities Corporation (collectively, “Farmer Mac”), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), and Rutledge Investment Company (“Rutledge”) compared to cash of $5.5 million and $201.1 million in undrawn availability under our credit facilities as of December 31, 2023. For more information on our deleveraging efforts and liquidity please see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had access to liquidity of $172.9 million, consisting of $9.3 million in cash and $163.6 million in undrawn availability under our credit facilities with Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Farmer Mac Mortgage Securities Corporation (collectively, “Farmer Mac”), Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), and Rutledge Investment Company (“Rutledge”) compared to cash of $78.4 million and $167.4 million in undrawn availability under our credit facilities as of December 31, 2024. For more information on our deleveraging efforts and liquidity please see “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

Previous wording

We expect that global demand for food, driven primarily by significant increases in the gross domestic product (“GDP”) per capita and global population, will continue to be the key driver of farmland values. We expect that global demand for most crops will continue to keep pace with global population growth. We also believe that growth in global GDP per capita, particularly in developing nations, will contribute significantly to increasing demand for primary crops. As global GDP per capita increases, the composition of daily caloric intake is expected to shift away from the direct consumption of primary crops toward more fruits, vegetables and animal-based proteins, which is expected to result in increased demand for primary crops as feed for livestock. We believe that once individuals increase consumption of higher quality food, they will strongly resist returning to their former dietary habits, resulting in greater inelasticity in the demand for food. We anticipate these factors will lead to either higher crop prices and/or higher yields and, therefore, higher rental rates on our farmland, as well as sustained growth in farmland values over the long term.

Current wording

As global GDP per capita increases, the composition of daily caloric intake is expected to shift away from the direct consumption of primary crops toward more fruits, vegetables and animal-based proteins, which is expected to result in increased demand for primary crops as feed for livestock. We believe that once individuals increase consumption of higher quality food, they will strongly resist returning to their former dietary habits, resulting in greater inelasticity in the demand for food. We anticipate these factors will lead to either higher crop prices and/or higher yields and, therefore, higher rental rates on our farmland, as well as sustained growth in farmland values over the long term.

Previous wording

Ukraine and the Russian Federation represent large portions of global trade in a variety of agricultural products (e.g., 34% of global wheat exports, according to the International Food Policy Research Institute). The disruption in farming operations in Ukraine, and trade from the Black Sea region has stressed the food supply for many countries that depend on imports of agricultural products from the region, such as Egypt (wheat for food products) and China (corn for livestock).

Current wording

Despite advances in income, according to “The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025,” a report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, 2.3 billion people were facing moderate to severe food insecurity in 2024. In particular, the disruption in farming operations in Ukraine as a result of the ongoing war in Ukraine has stressed the food supply for many countries that depend on imports of agricultural products from the region, such as Egypt (wheat for food products) and China (corn for livestock).The Russian Federation is also a major exporter of fertilizers and trade restrictions have hampered the flow of fertilizers to countries dependent on imports from the Black Sea region. United States farmers, including our tenants, however, generally source fertilizers from the United States and Canada.

Previous wording

According to the World Bank Group arable land per capita has decreased by approximately 50% from 1961 to 2021, further exacerbated by international conflicts, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. Typically, additions to cropland are in areas of marginal productivity, while cropland loss, driven by urban development, tends to affect primarily highly productive areas. According to a study published in 2017 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, urban expansion is expected to take place on cropland that is 1.77 times more productive than the global average. The global supply of food is also impacted by the productivity per acre of arable land. Historically, productivity gains (measured by average crop yields) have been driven by advances in seed technology, farm equipment, irrigation techniques, and improvements in soil health, chemical nutrients and pest control. On the other hand, we expect the shortage of water in many irrigated growing regions in the United States and around the globe, often as a result of new water restrictions imposed by laws or regulations, to lead to decreased productivity on those acres.

Current wording

According to the World Bank Group, arable land per capita has decreased by approximately 50% from 1961 to 2023, which decrease has been exacerbated by international conflicts, such as the ongoing war in Ukraine. Typically, additions to cropland are in areas of marginal productivity, while cropland loss, driven by urban development, tends to affect primarily highly productive areas. According to a study published in 2017 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, urban expansion is expected to take place on cropland that is 1.77 times more productive than the global average. The global supply of food is also impacted by the productivity per acre of arable land. Historically, productivity gains (measured by average crop yields) have been driven by advances in seed technology, farm equipment, irrigation techniques, and improvements in soil health, chemical nutrients and pest control. On the other hand, we expect the shortage of water in many irrigated growing regions in the United States and around the globe, often as a result of new water restrictions imposed by laws or regulations, to lead to decreased productivity on those acres.

Previous wording

becomes available in order to allocate their fixed costs over additional acres. Our view is that rental rates for farmland are a function of farmland operators’ view of the long-term profitability of farmland, and that many farm operators will compete for farmland even during periods of decreased profitability due to the scarcity of farmland available to rent. Furthermore, because it is generally customary in the industry to provide the existing tenant with the opportunity to re-lease the land at the end of each lease term, we believe that many farm operators will rent additional land that becomes available in order to control the ability to farm that land in future periods. As a result, in our experience, many farm operators will aggressively pursue rental opportunities in their operable geographic area, even when the farmer anticipates lower profits returns or even short-term losses.

Current wording

We believe quality farmland in the United States has a near-zero vacancy rate as a result of the supply and demand fundamentals discussed above. We believe that due to the relatively high fixed costs associated with farming operations (including equipment, labor and knowledge), many farm operators choose to rent additional acres of farmland when it becomes available in order to allocate their fixed costs over additional acres. Our view is that rental rates for farmland are a function of farmland operators’ view of the long-term profitability of farmland, and that many farm operators will compete for farmland even during periods of decreased profitability due to the scarcity of farmland available to rent. Furthermore, because it is generally customary in the industry to provide the existing tenant with the opportunity to re-

Previous wording

We incur costs associated with running a public company, including, among others, costs associated with our personnel, Board of Directors, compliance, legal and accounting, due diligence and acquisitions (including, among others, travel expenses and consulting fees). Inflation in personnel costs, which is impacting many United States businesses, is also likely to impact our expenses.

Current wording

We incur costs associated with running a public company, including, among others, costs associated with our personnel, Board of Directors, regulatory compliance, legal and accounting, due diligence and acquisitions (including, among others, travel expenses and consulting fees). Inflation in personnel costs, which is impacting many United States businesses, has not significantly impacted our expenses to date.

Previous wording

While many people assume that short-term crop prices have a great impact on farm values, we believe that long-term farmer profitability and revenue per acre, expressed as crop prices multiplied by crop yield, is a much more significant driver of farm value. Crop yield trends in corn and soybeans have been steadily increasing over the last thirty years. After yields for the 2023/2024 marketing year (September 2023 to August 2024) increased slightly for both corn and soybeans compared to the previous year, the USDA projects that yields will not change significantly for the 2024/2025 marketing year (September 2024 to August 2025). Short-term crop price changes have had little effect historically on farmland values. They also have a limited impact on our rental revenue, as most of our leases provide for fixed farm rents, a common approach in agricultural markets, especially with respect to row crops. Fixed farm rent significantly simplifies the administrative requirements for the landlord and the tenant, as farmers benefit from the fundamental revenue hedging that occurs when large crop yields mitigate the effect of lower crop prices. Similarly, lower crop yields have a tendency to trigger higher crop prices and help increase revenue even when confronted by lower crop yields. Such hedging effect also limits the impact of short-term crop price changes on revenues generated by leases with a variable rent component based on farm revenues. Further risk mitigation is available to tenants, and indirectly to us, via crop insurance and hedging programs implemented by tenants. Our TRS also takes advantage of these risk mitigation programs and strategies with respect to the properties it directly operates.

Current wording

We believe that long-term farmer profitability and revenue per acre, expressed as crop prices multiplied by crop yield, is a much more significant driver of farm value than short-term crop prices. Crop yield trends in corn and soybeans have been steadily increasing over the last thirty years. For instance, after yields for the 2024/2025 marketing year (September 2024 to August 2025) increased slightly for corn and held steady for soybeans compared to the previous year, the USDA projected that yields will increase slightly for the 2025/2026 marketing year (September 2025 to August 2026). Short-term crop price changes have had little effect historically on farmland values. They also have a limited impact on our rental revenue, as most of our leases provide for fixed farm rents, a common approach in agricultural markets, especially with respect to row crops. Fixed farm rent significantly simplifies the administrative requirements for the landlord and the tenant, as farmers benefit from the fundamental revenue hedging that occurs when large crop yields mitigate the effect of lower crop prices. Similarly, lower crop yields have a tendency to trigger higher crop prices and help increase revenue even when confronted by lower crop yields. Such hedging effect also limits the impact of short-term crop price changes on revenues generated by leases with a variable rent component based on farm revenues. Further risk mitigation is available to tenants, and indirectly to us, via crop insurance and hedging programs implemented by tenants. Our TRS also takes advantage of these risk mitigation programs and strategies with respect to the properties it directly operates.

Previous wording

Crop prices are affected by many factors that can differ on a yearly basis. Weather conditions and crop diseases can create a significant risk of price volatility. Changes in government regulations and policy, fluctuations in global prosperity, fluctuations in foreign trade and export markets and eruptions of military conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and the ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, or civil unrest also impact crop prices.

Current wording

Crop prices are affected by many factors that can differ on a yearly basis. Weather conditions and crop diseases can create a significant risk of price volatility. Changes in government regulations and policy, fluctuations in global prosperity, fluctuations in foreign trade and export markets and eruptions of military conflicts, such as the war in Ukraine and other geopolitical tensions, or civil unrest also impact crop prices.

Previous wording

Most of our farming leases have lease terms of three years for row crops and up to seven years for permanent crops, pursuant to which each tenant is responsible for substantially all of the operating expenses related to the property, including maintenance, water usage and insurance. As a result, we believe that the effect on us of inflationary increases in operating expenses are borne largely by our tenants under the terms of their leases, and inflationary increases in farmer profitability generally lead to increased rents upon lease renewals, as we experienced in the most recent renewal cycle in late 2023. Furthermore, high levels of inflation prompted the Federal Reserve to increase the federal funds rate (the rate the Federal Reserve charges member banks for overnight funds) eleven times between March 2022 and July 2023, which led to a significant increase in market short- and long-term interest rates beginning in early 2022. This increase in rates has significantly increased the cost of our floating rate debt and has also significantly increased the cost of certain of our MetLife debt with interest rates that have been reset since the beginning of 2022. However, we have recently repaid most of our floating rate debt with the proceeds from dispositions. Moreover, the Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate in September, November and December 2024. We anticipate any future rate cuts will have a favorable impact on the cost of debt for the Company moving forward. However, interest rates remain high, and the Federal Reserve has most recently signaled that it will not be making rate cuts over the next several quarters.

Current wording

High levels of inflation prompted the Board of Governors of the United States Federal Reserve (the “Federal Reserve”) to increase the federal funds rate eleven times between March 2022 and July 2023, which led to a significant increase in market short- and long-term interest rates beginning in early 2022. This increase in rates significantly increased the cost of our floating rate debt and also significantly increased the cost of certain of our MetLife debt with interest rates that have been reset since the beginning of 2022. The Federal Reserve lowered the federal funds rate in September, November and December 2024 and in September, October and December 2025. We anticipate future rate cuts, if any, will have a favorable impact on the cost of debt for the Company moving forward. However, interest rates remain high relative to the recent past, and the Federal Reserve’s plans are subject to numerous uncertainties.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, $78.9 million of our outstanding indebtedness was subject to interest rates that reset before maturity (excluding our floating rate debt). There is no debt subject to interest rate resets in 2025.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, $67.8 million of our outstanding indebtedness was subject to interest rates that reset before maturity (excluding our floating rate debt), of which $26.2 million was subject to interest rates that will be reset in 2026.

Previous wording

At December 31, 2024, $11.8 million, or 5.7%, of our debt had variable interest rates, however, as stated in “Note 10—Hedge Accounting” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we have an interest rate swap with Rabobank for $11.8 million, which effectively reduces floating rate exposure to $0.0 million.

Current wording

At December 31, 2025, $4.9 million, or 3.0%, of our debt had variable interest rates, however, as stated in “Note 10—Hedge Accounting” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements, we have an interest rate swap with Rabobank for $4.9 million, which effectively reduces our floating rate exposure to $0.0 million.

Previous wording

We expect that future changes in interest rates will impact our overall operating performance by, among other things, affecting our borrowing costs and borrowing costs of our tenants. While we may seek to manage our exposure to future changes in rates through interest rate swap agreements or interest rate caps, portions of our overall outstanding debt will likely remain at floating rates or subject to interest rates that reset periodically. In addition, if interest rates begin to rise again, farmland prices may decline if the rise in real interest rates (nominal interest rates minus the inflation rate) is not accompanied by rises in the general levels of inflation. However, our business model anticipates that over time the value of our farmland will increase, as it has in the past, at a rate that is equal to or greater than the rate of inflation, which may in part offset the impact of rising interest rates on the value of our farmland, but there can be no guarantee that this appreciation will occur to the extent that we anticipate or at all.

Current wording

We expect that future changes in interest rates will impact our overall operating performance by, among other things, affecting our borrowing costs and the borrowing costs of our tenants. While we may seek to manage our exposure to future changes in rates through interest rate swap agreements or interest rate caps, portions of our overall outstanding debt will likely remain at floating rates or subject to interest rates that reset periodically. In addition, if interest rates begin to rise again, farmland prices may decline if the rise in real interest rates (nominal interest rates minus the inflation rate) is not accompanied by rises in the general levels of inflation. However, our business model anticipates that over time the value of our farmland will increase, as it has in the past, at a rate that is equal to or greater than the rate of inflation, which may in part offset the impact of rising interest rates on the value of our farmland, but there can be no guarantee that this appreciation will occur to the extent that we anticipate or at all.

Previous wording

According to the USDA Outlook for Agricultural Trade, the top three export countries from the United States were China, Mexico, and Canada. Exports to China for fiscal year 2024 (October 2023 to September 2024) were $25.7 billion, down 23% from 2023. Exports to Canada were $29.0 billion, up 3% from 2023. Exports to Mexico were $30.0 billion, up 7% from 2023. Exports to China for fiscal year 2025 (October 2024 to September 2025) are forecast to decrease to $23.3 billion. Exports to Mexico are expected to decrease slightly to $29.9 billion, while exports to Canada are expected to increase slightly to $29.2 billion.

Current wording

According to the USDA, approximately 10-20% of domestic corn production and 40-60% of domestic soybean production is exported. According to the USDA Outlook for Agricultural Trade, the top three export countries from the United States were China, Mexico, and Canada. Exports to China for fiscal year 2025 (October 2024 to September 2025) were $16.2 billion, down 37% from 2024. Exports to Canada were $28.2 billion, down 3% from 2024. Exports to Mexico were $30.4 billion, up 1% from 2024. The recent imposition by the United States of tariffs on imported goods from these trading partners may strain international trade relations and increase the risk that foreign governments will implement retaliatory tariffs on agricultural and other goods imported from the United States.

Previous wording

When allocating the purchase price of properties acquired using the relative fair value, a number of significant assumptions can be used by management. We may utilize various sources, including third-party appraisals, our own analysis of recently acquired or developed properties and existing comparable properties in our portfolio, other market data and property specific characteristics such as soil types, water availability and the existence of leases acquired with the acquisition. The allocations of purchase price are sensitive and involve a degree of uncertainty due to the nature of the

Current wording

When allocating the purchase price of properties acquired using the relative fair value, a number of significant assumptions can be used by management. We may utilize various sources, including third-party appraisals, our own analysis of recently acquired or developed properties and existing comparable properties in our portfolio, other market data and property specific characteristics such as soil types, water availability and the existence of leases acquired with the acquisition. The allocations of purchase price are sensitive and involve a degree of uncertainty due to the nature of the inputs and judgements, as well as the number, magnitude and complexity of these inputs and judgements made by management. See “Note 5—Real Estate” for additional discussion regarding acquisitions completed by the Company.

Previous wording

Assessing impairment can be complex and involves a high degree of subjectivity in determining if impairment indicators are present and in estimating the future undiscounted cash flows or the fair value of an asset. In particular, these estimates are sensitive to significant assumptions, including the estimation of future rental revenues, operating expenses, discount and capitalization rates and our intent and ability to hold the related asset, all of which could be affected by our expectations about future market or economic conditions. Assumptions are primarily subject to property-specific characteristics, especially with respect to our intent and ability to hold the related asset. While these property-specific assumptions can have a significant impact on the undiscounted cash flows or estimated fair value of a particular asset, our evaluation of the reported carrying values of long-lived assets during the current year were not particularly sensitive to external or market assumptions. During the quarter ended September 30, 2023, the Company was under contract to sell an asset for less than its carrying amount, resulting in an impairment of $3.8 million. The estimated fair value of this asset was $3.6 million. The asset was sold during the fourth quarter of 2023. During the quarter ended December 31, 2023, the Company determined that one of its assets had an estimated fair value of $9.8 million, resulting in an impairment of $2.0 million. This is considered a Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 is defined as inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value measurement. The asset was valued based upon a market assessment of similar properties. There was $0.2 million and $5.8 million of impairment recognized on real estate assets in the accompanying financial statements during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Current wording

Assessing impairment can be complex and involves a high degree of subjectivity in determining if impairment indicators are present and in estimating the future undiscounted cash flows or the fair value of an asset. In particular, these estimates are sensitive to significant assumptions, including the estimation of future rental revenues, operating expenses, discount and capitalization rates and our intent and ability to hold the related asset, all of which could be affected by our expectations about future market or economic conditions. Assumptions are primarily subject to property-specific characteristics, especially with respect to our intent and ability to hold the related asset. While these property-specific assumptions can have a significant impact on the undiscounted cash flows or estimated fair value of a particular asset, our evaluation of the reported carrying values of long-lived assets during the current year were not particularly sensitive to external or market assumptions. During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company recorded impairment in connection with certain properties in the West Coast region that the Company concluded have experienced a loss of value due to crop and water dynamics that are not recoverable in the short- or medium-term. The assets were written down to their estimated fair value. This is considered a Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 measurements are defined as inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value measurement. These assets were valued based upon a market assessment of similar properties. As a result, the Company recognized $17.8 million and $0.2 million of impairment on real estate assets in the accompanying financial statements during the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Previous wording

Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill has been reduced below its carrying value. Assessing the fair value of a reporting unit involves a high degree of subjectivity. Significant assumptions include future cash flow, discount rates and future capital requirements. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment expense is recognized. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset is below its carrying value. Assessing the fair value of the asset involves a high degree of subjectivity regarding the significant assumptions including future cash flow and the discount rate. There have been no goodwill impairments recognized in the accompanying financial statements during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023. During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded impairment of $0.6 million and $0.0 million, respectively, on intangible assets. The fair value of trade names was determined to be $1.2 million at December 31, 2024. The Company utilized the relief from royalties method to determine the present value of cash flows and the through 2049 and the present value of residual cash flows, utilizing a discount rate of 8.7% and an average long-term revenue growth rate range of 0-3% per year. This is considered a Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 is defined as inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value measurement.

Current wording

Goodwill is not amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit with goodwill has been reduced below its carrying value. Assessing the fair value of a reporting unit involves a high degree of subjectivity. Significant assumptions include future cash flow, discount rates and future capital requirements. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an impairment expense is recognized. Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset is below its carrying value. Assessing the fair value of the asset involves a high degree of subjectivity regarding the significant assumptions including future cash flow and the discount rate. In November 2025, the Company sold MWA, the Company’s auction, brokerage and third-party management business, and its subsidiaries. As a result of the sale, the Company no longer had goodwill or intangible assets as of December 31, 2025 and there were no impairments of goodwill or intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2025. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded no impairment of goodwill and an impairment of intangible assets of $0.6 million. The impairment related to a decrease in the fair value of trade names to $1.2 million as of December 31, 2024. The Company utilized the relief from royalties method to determine the present value of cash flows and the through 2049 and the present value of residual cash flows, utilizing a discount rate of 8.7% and an average long-term revenue growth rate range of 0-3% per year. This is considered a Level 3 measurement under the fair value hierarchy. Level 3 is defined as inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable, supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value measurement.

Previous wording

Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2024 was primarily affected by dispositions that occurred in 2023 and 2024, as well as higher crop sales, income from forfeited deposits, lower interest expense and lower cost of goods sold, partially offset by severance expense of $1.4 million and $2.3 million of special bonuses. The severance expense was incurred in connection with the previously announced departure of the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer as part of the Company's cost-cutting initiative.

Current wording

Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2025 was primarily affected by dispositions that occurred in 2024 and 2025, as well as higher crop sales, interest income, proceeds from a solar lease arrangement with a tenant, and lower general and administrative expense and interest expense, partially offset by lower income from forfeited deposits, higher cost of goods sold and impairment.

Previous wording

Rental income decreased $2.1 million, or 4.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, resulting primarily from dispositions that occurred in 2023 and 2024, partially offset by increased variable rent.

Current wording

Rental income decreased $11.2 million, or 23.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, resulting primarily from dispositions that occurred in 2024 and 2025, partially offset by proceeds from a solar lease arrangement with a tenant and increased variable rent.

Previous wording

Crop sales increased $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was the result of a higher volume of walnut, citrus and avocado sales on our directly operated properties.

Current wording

Crop sales increased $0.5 million, or 9.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This increase was primarily the result of accelerated revenue from walnuts due to the sale of a property and a higher volume of citrus sales on our directly operated properties.

Previous wording

Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $1.9 million, or 25.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was a result of asset dispositions in 2023 and 2024 and more assets becoming fully depreciated, partially offset by depreciable assets being placed into service.

Current wording

Depreciation, depletion and amortization decreased $1.4 million, or 25.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was a result of asset dispositions in 2024 and 2025 and a lower cost basis on assets impaired during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Property operating expenses decreased $1.3 million, or 14.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023, resulting from lower tax and insurance expense primarily due to dispositions that occurred in 2023 and 2024.

Current wording

Property operating expenses decreased $1.7 million, or 23.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, resulting primarily from lower tax, repairs and maintenance and insurance expenses, primarily due to dispositions that occurred in 2024 and 2025.

Previous wording

General and administrative expenses increased $2.8 million, or 24.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This increase was driven by a one-time severance expense of $1.4 million and $2.3 million of special bonuses during the year ended December 31, 2024, partially offset by lower compensation and travel expense. The severance expense was incurred in connection with the previously announced departure of the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer as part of the Company's cost-cutting initiative.

Current wording

General and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million, or 16.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. General and administrative expense during the year ended December 31, 2024 included a one-time severance expense of $1.4 million and special bonuses of $2.3 million while 2025 included an increase in the allowance on loans under the FPI loan program totaling $1.9 million, partially offset by lower compensation and travel expense.

Previous wording

Impairment of assets decreased $5.1 million, or 86.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. Impairment during the year ended December 31, 2023, was the result of a property classified as held for sale and written down to its estimated fair value less costs to sell, while impairment during the year ended December 31, 2024 was related to the write-down on the value of trade names associated with Murray Wise Associates, LLC and impairment of irrigation assets held for sale at year-end.

Current wording

Impairment of assets was $17.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2024. Impairment during the year ended December 31, 2025 related to certain properties on the West Coast while impairment during the year ended December 31, 2024 was related to the write-down on the value of trade names associated with Murray Wise Associates, LLC and impairment of irrigation assets held for sale at year-end..

Previous wording

Other income remained relatively flat at $0.1 million and $0.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Current wording

Other operating expenses remained relatively flat at $0.0 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Previous wording

Other revenue remained relatively flat at $6.1 million and $6.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Current wording

Income from equity method investment remained relatively flat at $0.2 million and $0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively.

Previous wording

(Income) from forfeited deposits was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to $0.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2023, due to the termination of a repurchase agreement and the retention of $1.2 million in earnest money payments.

Current wording

Gain on forfeited earnest money decreased $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024, due to the termination of a repurchase agreement and the retention of $1.2 million in earnest money payments that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2024.

Previous wording

Interest expense decreased $3.8 million, or 16.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2024 compared to the year ended December 31, 2023. This decrease was the result of lower outstanding debt primarily attributable to debt repayments totaling $239.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2024, partially offset by higher interest rates.

Current wording

Interest expense decreased $9.2 million, or 48.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2025 compared to the year ended December 31, 2024. This decrease was the result of lower outstanding debt attributable to significant debt repayments during the year ended December 31, 2025.

Previous wording

Despite cuts in the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve in September, November and December 2024, interest rates remain high, and there can be no certainty as to the occurrence, timing or magnitude of future rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. We expect to meet our liquidity needs through cash on hand, undrawn availability under our lines of credit ($167.4 million in availability as of December 31, 2024), operating cash flows, borrowings, proceeds from equity issuances and selective asset dispositions where such dispositions are deemed to be in the best interests of the Company. The Company also has an effective shelf-registration statement that it may use to issue equity or debt securities to raise capital from time to time.

Current wording

Despite cuts in the federal funds rate by the Federal Reserve in September, November and December 2024 and in September, October and December 2025, interest rates remain high relative to the recent past. We expect to meet our liquidity needs through cash on hand, undrawn availability under our lines of credit ($163.6 million in availability as of December 31, 2025), operating cash flows, borrowings, proceeds from equity issuances and selective asset dispositions where such dispositions are deemed to be in the best interests of the Company. The Company also has an effective shelf-registration statement that it may use to issue equity or debt securities to raise capital from time to time.

Previous wording

When material debt repayments are due within the following 12 months, we work with current and new lenders and other potential sources of capital sufficiently in advance of the debt maturity to ensure that all of our obligations are satisfied in a timely manner. We have a history of being able to refinance or extend our debt obligations to manage our debt maturities. Our ability to access the equity capital markets will depend on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions. We have $25.0 million in debt maturities due within the next 12 months.

Current wording

When material debt repayments are due within the following 12 months, we work with current and new lenders and other potential sources of capital sufficiently in advance of the debt maturity to ensure that all of our obligations are satisfied in a timely manner. We have a history of being able to refinance or extend our debt obligations to manage our debt maturities. Our ability to access the equity capital markets will depend on a number of factors as well, including general market conditions. We have $68.3 million in debt maturities due within the next 12 months. Of the $68.3 million in debt maturities, $67.1 million is in the process of being refinanced.

Previous wording

During the year ended December 31, 2024, we repurchased 2,240,295 shares of our common stock at a weighted average price of $12.25 per share. As of December 31, 2024, we had authority to repurchase up to an aggregate of $55.8 million in additional shares of our common stock.

Current wording

During the year ended December 31, 2025, we repurchased 3,411,581 shares of our common stock at a weighted average price of $11.07 per share under our share repurchase program. As of December 31, 2025, we had authority to repurchase up to an aggregate of $17.9 million in additional shares of our common stock.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had $78.4 million of cash and cash equivalents compared to $5.5 million at December 31, 2023.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had $9.3 million of cash and cash equivalents compared to $78.4 million at December 31, 2024.

Previous wording

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities increased by $3.3 million primarily as a result of the following:

Current wording

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by operating activities increased by $1.3 million primarily as a result of the following:

Previous wording

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities increased by $110.3 million primarily as a result of the following:

Current wording

Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities decreased by $205.4 million primarily as a result of the following: