ASTEC INDUSTRIES INC
For the period ended Apr 25, 2025. Filed Mar 14, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 25, 2025 · Filed Mar 14, 2025
Contents
Elements of Our Compensation Program
35 Astec Industries, Inc. | Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement 2025
Elements of Our Compensation Program
In calendar year 2024, the principal elements of our executive compensation program, and the purposes for each element, were as follows:
| | Component | | | Objectives | | | Key Features | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Base Salary | | | Recognizes market pay information, as well as individual experience, performance and level of responsibility | | | Reasonable level of fixed compensation designed to attract and retain talent | |
| | Annual Cash Incentive | | | Motivates and establishes a strong link between pay and performance during the year | | | Variable, at risk compensation directly tied to the achievement of financial and strategic annual goals | |
| | Long-term EquityIncentive | | | Aligns management compensation with creating long-term shareholder value and retains talent through multi-year vesting; Facilitates stock ownership by employees | | | Time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs) that vest based on continued employment and satisfaction of performance goals | |
In addition to the above described key components, the Company’s executive officer compensation program also includes certain limited perquisites and executive benefits, including contributions to the Company’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) (the SERP is closed to new participants), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (“Deferred Compensation Plan”) that allows participants to defer a portion of their base salary and/or annual bonus, as well as other benefits that are generally available to all employees of the Company, including medical and 401(k) plans.
Base Salary
Base salary is the fixed component of our named executive officers’ target total direct compensation. The Compensation Committee reviews base salaries on an annual basis and increases for named executive officers, when given, historically have been intended to reflect changes in market-based compensation for similarly-situated
executives in our industry, with further increases approved by the Compensation Committee based on a subjective assessment of a number of factors as discussed above. Base salary changes for the CEO are approved by the Company’s full Board.
In determining base salaries for the non-CEO named executive officers each year, the Compensation Committee considers evaluations and recommendations provided by the Company’s CEO regarding whether adjustments to base compensation of the other named executive officers are warranted (each of whom report directly to the CEO), its own observations, and market data provided by the Committee’s independent consultant. In recommending changes to the CEO’s base salary to the full Board for approval, the Compensation Committee considers its own observations and assessments with respect to individual performance, feedback from the full Board, the CEO’s leadership of the Company and market data provided by its consultant.
After considering these factors, and discussing proposed salaries for the other named executive officers with the CEO, the Compensation Committee approved annual salaries for the named executive officers (with the indicated percentage increases), effective April 1, 2024 (or as of a later date in 2024, as indicated):
| · Executive Officer · · · Base Salaryas of 12/31/23 · · · PercentageChange · · · Base Salaryas of 12/31/24(1) · | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Mr. van der Merwe | | | | $725,000 | | | | | | 10.3% | | | | | $800,000 | | | |
| | Ms. Weyenberg(5) | | | | $492,800 | | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | |
| | Mr. Jonker(2) | | | | $250,000 | | | | | | 10.0% | | | | | $275,000 | | | |
| | Mr. Norris | | | | $415,000 | | | | | | 2.9% | | | | | $427,000 | | | |
| | Mr. Snyman | | | | $436,000 | | | | | | 3.0% | | | | | $449,000 | | | |
| | Mr. Harris(3) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | $550,000 | | |
| | Mr. Gilbert(4) | | | | | — | | | | | | — | | | | | $400,000 | | |
(1)
The base salary increases for the named executive officers were generally made to bring their compensation in line with similarly situated executives in our industry and with comparable levels of revenue responsibility, based in part on FW Cook’s compensation study and market analysis completed in Fall 2023.
(2)
Mr. Jonker was placed in the interim CFO role in the Company on March 2, 2024, and his base salary for his service in this role was set at $375,000; his base salary was subsequently decreased to $275,000 in connection with reverting to his previous role effective October 7, 2024.
(3)
Mr. Harris joined the Company on October 7, 2024, and his base salary was set at $550,000.
(4)
Mr. Gilbert joined the Company on March 25, 2024, and his base salary was set at $400,000.
(5)
Ms. Weyenberg’s employment with the Company terminated on April 30, 2024 and she did not receive an increase to her base salary for 2024.
36 Astec Industries, Inc. | Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement 2025
Changes to the base salaries for the other named executive officers were in line with market conditions.
Annual Cash Incentive Compensation
We provide annual cash incentive opportunities to motivate and reward the named executive officers for achievement of financial results and key business objectives. For calendar year 2024, the Compensation Committee continued with our annual incentive plan (AIP) in a manner largely consistent with the AIP that was in place for calendar year 2023. The primary components of the program are discussed below.
A target bonus opportunity is set for each named executive officer as a percentage of base salary, with the percentage varying depending on their position, based on a review of competitive market practices and internal equity considerations. For 2024, the AIP target amounts for the named executive officers were as follows:
| · Executive Officer · · · Target 2023 Incentive(% of Base Salary) · · · Target 2024 Incentive(% of Base Salary) · · · Target 2024Incentive ($) · | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Mr. van der Merwe | | | | | 100% | | | | | | 100% | | | | | $800,000 | | |
| | Ms. Weyenberg(1) | | | | | 70% | | | | | | 70% | | | | | $344,960 | | |
| | Mr. Jonker(2) | | | | | 40% | | | | | | 40% | | | | | $131,800 | | |
| | Mr. Norris | | | | | 60% | | | | | | 60% | | | | | $256,200 | | |
| | Mr. Snyman | | | | | 60% | | | | | | 60% | | | | | $269,400 | | |
| | Mr. Harris(3) | | | | | — | | | | | | 70% | | | | | $385,000 | | |
| | Mr. Gilbert(4) | | | | | — | | | | | | 50% | | | | | $200,000 | | |
(1)
Ms. Weyenberg’s employment with the Company terminated on April 30, 2024 and her award was forfeited upon her termination.
(2)
The dollar value of Mr. Jonker’s target 2024 incentive shown above is pro-rated based on his roles and respective salaries in the 2024 year. His target percentage did not change when he was appointed to interim CFO.
(3)
Mr. Harris joined the Company on October 7, 2024, and his AIP target was prorated to reflect the portion of the year he was employed by the Company.
(4)
Mr. Gilbert joined the Company on March 25, 2024, and his AIP target was prorated to reflect the portion of the year he was employed by the Company.
In order to earn any annual incentive pay for the Adjusted EBITDA metric, a plan trigger goal must be achieved. For calendar year 2024, the plan trigger goal was achieving at least 65% of a target Adjusted EBITDA goal, or $89.7 million. Assuming the plan trigger goal was achieved, actual incentive amounts that could be earned by the named executive officers for 2024 ranged from 50% (for performance at threshold levels) to a maximum of 200% (for performance above target levels) of their respective target bonus amounts, based on the level of achievement of performance goals relating to three key metrics: Adjusted EBITDA (weighted 50%), Working Capital Turnover (weighted 25%), and a non-financial metric related to the successful achievement of our enterprise resource planning implementation project milestones (weighted 25%). If the trigger goal was not achieved, then Adjusted EBITDA would not payout. Liner interpolation would be used for results falling between performance levels. Performance goals for the CEO, CFO, Group Presidents and other corporate officers relate 100% to total Company performance. We retained Adjusted EBITDA (defined below) as an AIP performance metric for calendar year 2024 because we continue to believe that it is an efficient short-term measure of operating performance, profitability and cash flow. We also retained Working Capital Turnover (defined below) as an AIP performance metric for calendar year 2024 because it is an important indicator of how efficiently we use our working capital to support our sales, which we believe is critical to our success. We included the non-financial metric — Strategy Execution — related to the successful on-time achievement of project milestones associated with our enterprise resource planning implementation project because this is a strategic initiative that is critical to the Company’s transformation.
| · Company Performance Goals and 2024 Results · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · · Weighting · · · Threshold(50%) · · · Target(100%) · · · Maximum(200%) · · · Actual 2024Results · · · Unweighted Actual Payoutas a % ofTarget · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Adjusted EBITDA(1) | | | | | 50% | | | | | $ | 110.4M | | | | | $ | 138M | | | | | $ | 165.6M | | | | | $ | 111.8M | | | | | | 52% | | |
| | Working Capital Turnover(2) | | | | | 25% | | | | 3.2 | | | 4.0 | | | 4.8 | | | 3.6 | | | | | 77% | | | ||||||||||||
| | Strategy Execution(3) | | | | | 25% | | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 200% | | | 50% | | | | | 50% | | | ||||||||||||
| | Weighted Overall Payout % (% of Target) | | | | | | | | | 50% | | | 100% | | | 200% | | | | | | | | | | | 58.1% | | | |||||||||
(1)
Adjusted EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization each excluding the effect of acquisitions completed during the year, further adjusted for gains or losses outside the normal scope of our ordinary activities including but not limited to transformation program costs, restructuring and other related charges, asset impairments, gains or losses on the sale of assets,
37 Astec Industries, Inc. | Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement 2025
transaction costs representing acquisition and integration related costs and other items of income expense, gain or loss, that, in the case of each of the foregoing are identified in the publicly filed reports.
(2)
Working capital turnover ratio is a formula that calculates how efficiently the company utilizes working capital to support sales and growth. Working capital is current assets minus current liabilities. The working capital turnover ratio is calculated as follows: annual net sales divided by the average amount of working capital during the same year.
(3)
Strategy Execution is a non-financial metric related to the successful on-time achievement of project milestones associated with our enterprise resource planning implementation project because this is a strategic initiative that is critical to the Company’s transformation.
Based on achievement on the performance goals in calendar year 2024, the Compensation Committee approved the following 2024 AIP bonus payments for the named executive officers: Mr. van der Merwe, $464,848; Mr. Harris, $52,673; Mr. Norris, $148,876; Mr. Snyman, $156,537; Mr. Gilbert, $89,724 and Mr. Jonker $76,584. As noted above, Ms. Weyenberg’s employment with the Company terminated prior to the end of calendar year 2024, and as a result, she did not earn an AIP incentive payment.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
Grants of equity-based compensation are designed to create a strong and direct link between executive officer pay and shareholder return and to enable executive officers to develop and maintain a long-term position in the Company’s common stock. For calendar year 2024, the Committee approved equity awards to key employees, including the named executive officers, consisting of time-based restricted stock units (RSUs) and performance-based restricted stock units (PSUs). RSUs comprise 50% of the 2024 annual Long-Term Incentive (“LTI”) grant value, and will vest in equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the grant date, subject to the participant’s continued employment with the Company. PSUs comprise the remaining 50% of the annual LTI grant value awarded in 2024 and can be earned in amounts between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares granted. The PSUs granted in 2024 have a single, three-year performance period and will vest and be earned on the third anniversary of the grant date. The amount of PSUs earned will be based on the level of achievement of performance goals relating to two metrics:
Adjusted ROIC is based on a three-year average that accounts for 50% of the total PSU award value. Adjusted ROIC has historically been strongly correlated to shareholder value creation and supports a disciplined approach to capital management. Adjusted ROIC is a non-GAAP financial measure that is defined as income or loss from operations less income taxes and further adjusted for gains or losses outside the normal scope of our ordinary activities including but not limited to transformation program costs, restructuring and other related charges, asset impairments, gains or losses on the sale of assets, transaction costs representing acquisition and integration related costs and other items of income expense, gain or loss, after tax and divided by average invested capital. Linear interpolation applies between these performance levels.
Total shareholder return (TSR) relative to a custom comparator accounts for the remaining 50% PSU award value. This metric has been used as a performance measure for PSU awards since 2016 and measures our stock price performance relative to a custom TSR comparator group. PSUs may be earned between 0% and 200% of the target number of shares granted based on our TSR relative to our TSR peer group, as follows: 200% of the target award is earned if our TSR is at or above the comparator group 75th percentile; 100% of the target award is earned if our TSR is at the comparator group 50th percentile; 50% of the target award is earned if our TSR is at the comparator group 25th percentile; and 0% of the target award is earned if our TSR is below the 25th percentile. Linear interpolation applies between these performance levels.
The Committee approved awards of RSUs and PSUs for each named executive officer with the intended target grant values and the number of RSUs and PSUs granted to each named executive officer being as follows:
| · · · · Time-Based RSUs · · · PSUs — Adjusted ROIC · · · PSUs — TSR · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · · TargetedAwardValue ($) · · · AwardsGranted · · · TargetedAwardValue ($) · · · AwardsGranted(at target) · · · TargetedAwardValue ($) · · · AwardsGranted(at target) · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Mr. van der Merwe | | | | | 1,075,000 | | | | | | 30,523 | | | | | | 537,500 | | | | | | 15,261 | | | | | | 537,500 | | | | | | 15,261 | | |
| | Ms. Weyenberg | | | | | 343,000 | | | | | | 9,739 | | | | | | 171,500 | | | | | | 4,870 | | | | | | 171,500 | | | | | | 4,869 | | |
| | Mr. Jonker | | | | | 65,900 | | | | | | 2,320 | | | | | | 131,800 | | | | | | 355 | | | | | | 263,600 | | | | | | 355 | | |
| | Mr. Norris | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | | 5,679 | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | | | 2,840 | | | | | | 100,000 | | | | | | 2,839 | | |
| | Mr. Snyman | | | | | 260,000 | | | | | | 7,383 | | | | | | 130,000 | | | | | | 3,691 | | | | | | 130,000 | | | | | | 3,691 | | |
| | Mr. Harris | | | | | 400,000 | | | | | | 4,145 | | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | | 2,073 | | | | | | 200,000 | | | | | | 2,072 | | |
| | Mr. Gilbert | | | | | 180,000 | | | | | | 4,747 | | | | | | 90,000 | | | | | | 2,374 | | | | | | 90,000 | | | | | | 2,373 | | |
Deferred Compensation Plan
The Deferred Compensation Plan is a nonqualified deferred compensation plan that the Company adopted effective January 1, 2021, to provide select employees, including its executive officers, with an opportunity to voluntarily defer the receipt of a portion of their base salary and/or annual cash incentive awards. The Compensation Committee believes that providing opportunities to
defer taxable income is an important part of an attractive rewards program necessary to recruit and retain qualified executive officers.
Perquisites and other Executive Benefits
Executive officers are eligible for certain perquisites and additional benefits that are not available to all employees (but are available to many management level employees), such as our SERP (the SERP is
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.