SONOCO PRODUCTS CO
For the period ended Apr 17, 2024. Filed Mar 15, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 17, 2024 · Filed Mar 15, 2024
Contents
Pay Versus Performance
officer, and becoming the Chief Financial Officer would vest on a pro rata basis in the event of a qualifying termination in connection with a change in control and would vest on a pro rata basis upon death or disability subject to approval of the Committee. Unvested RSUs that comprise 40% of the NEOs annual LTI grant would vest on a pro-rata basis in cases of retirement, provided NEO is age 60 or older with a minimum of 5 years of service. The retirement provision does not apply to Special RSU grants, as they would be forfeited.
(3)
Premiums paid by the Company on behalf of officers for executive term life insurance policies, as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” will be continued for 6 months post-employment.
PAY RATIO
As required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Sonoco is providing the following information about the relationship of the median of the annual total compensation of all Sonoco employees except the CEO, and the annual total compensation of the CEO. Using an analytical and statistical sampling, the median employee for the total global employee population of 22,501 as of December 31, 2023 was determined. To identify the median employee, “base pay” was used as a consistently applied compensation measure. To determine estimated median base pay, recorded base salary for salaried employees and annual base pay for hourly employees was established by multiplying each employee’s hourly rate by their scheduled hourly work week. A valid statistical sampling approach was utilized to identify employees who were expected to be paid within a +/- 5% range of that value. From this group an employee who was reasonably representative of the median employee was selected. Mr. Coker’s total compensation for purposes of the pay ratio calculation was $8,594,298. For 2023, the ratio of CEO pay to median employee pay is 125:1. The median employee’s Summary Compensation Table total compensation was $68,962 after including $13,249 in employer-provided health and welfare benefits and $3,571 in retirement contributions for the median employee. An amount of $13,249 in employer-provided health and welfare benefits for the CEO was included in the ratio calculation, which is not included in the Summary Compensation Table.
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”
The following table shows the past three fiscal years’ total compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) as set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table,” the compensation actually paid to our NEOs, the company’s total shareholder return (TSR), the combined TSR of our selected peer group, our Net Income, and our Base EBITDA.
| · (a) · · · (b) · · · (c) · · · (d) · · · (e) · · · (f) · · · (g) · · · (h) · · · (i) · · · (j) · · · (k) · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| · · · · Summary Compensation Table Total for First PEO(1) · · · Summary Compensation Table Total for Second PEO(2) · · · Compensation actually paid to First PEO(3)(4) · · · Compensation actually paid to Second PEO(2)(4) · · · Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs(3) · · · Average Compensation actually paid for Non-CEO NEOs(3) · · · Value of initial Fixed $100 Investment based on: · · · · · · · · · · · · · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| · Year · · · TSR(5) · · · Peer Group TSR(6) · · · Net Income(000s) · · · Base EBITDA(7)(000s) · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2023 | | | | $8,538,593 | | | | | | | | | | | $4,755,985 | | | | | | | | | | | $2,178,332 | | | | | $1,898,091 | | | | | $103.03 | | | | | $118.91 | | | | | $474,959 | | | | | $1,049,857 | | | ||||||||
| | 2022 | | | | | 9,794,049 | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,284,414 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,725,992 | | | | | | 3,254,066 | | | | | | 108.05 | | | | | | 110.49 | | | | | | 466,980 | | | | | | 1,147,809 | | |
| | 2021 | | | | | 6,618,454 | | | | | | | | | | | | 9,843,147 | | | | | | | | | | | | 2,476,273 | | | | | | 3,575,707 | | | | | | 99.75 | | | | | | 134.41 | | | | | | (82,711) | | | | | | 758,033 | | |
| | 2020 | | | | | 6,815,923 | | | | | $1,934,105 | | | | | | 5,088,280 | | | | | $(2,271,154) | | | | | | 2,530,532 | | | | | | 1,557,308 | | | | | | 99.24 | | | | | | 121.14 | | | | | | 207,241 | | | | | | 789,735 | | | ||
(1)
The first PEO is Mr. Coker who was appointed as CEO effective February 1, 2020.
(2)
The second PEO is Mr. Tiede, who retired as the Company’s CEO effective February 1, 2020.
(3)
The Other NEO’s for each applicable year are:
64 • Sonoco 2024 Proxy Statement
| Year | | | Non-CEO NEOs | |
| 2023 | | | Robert R. Dillard, Rodger D. Fuller, John M. Florence, Jr., James A. Harrell, III | |
| 2022 | | | Robert R. Dillard, Rodger D. Fuller, John M. Florence, Jr., James A. Harrell, Julie C. Albrecht | |
| 2021 | | | Julie C. Albrecht, Rodger D. Fuller, John M. Florence, Jr., Jeffery S. Tomaszewski, | |
| 2020 | | | Julie C. Albrecht, Rodger D. Fuller, John M. Florence, Jr., James A. Harrell, III | |
(4)
The SEC rules require that certain adjustments be made to the Summary Compensation Table totals to determine compensation actually paid, as reported in the Pay versus Performance table above. The following table details the applicable adjustments that were made to determine compensation actually paid:
| Year · · · Executive · · · Reported Summary Compensation Table Total · · · Reported Value of Equity Awards · · · Reported Change in the Actuarial Present Value of Pension Benefits · · · Pension Benefit Adjustments · · · Year End Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted that are Unvested in the year · · · Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Equity Awards · · · Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Equity Awards Granted and Vested in the Year · · · Year over Year Change in Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested in the Year · · · Fair Value at the End of the Prior Year of Equity Awards that Failed to Meet Vesting Conditions in the Year · · · Value of Dividends or other Earnings Paid on Stock or Option Awards not Otherwise Reflected in Fair Value or Total Compensation · · · Compensation Actually paid · | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | | | First PEO | | | | $8,538,593 | | | | | $(6,876,983) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | $3,929,477 | | | | | $(725,784) | | | | | $76,924 | | | | | $(263,750) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | $77,508 | | | | | $4,755,985 | | | ||||||||
| | Avg NEO | | | | | 2,178,332 | | | | | | (1,350,697) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 763,944 | | | | | | (82,854) | | | | | | 17,671 | | | | | | 368,713 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 2,982 | | | | | | 1,898,091 | | | ||
| 2022 | | | First PEO | | | | | 9,794,049 | | | | | | (6,205,527) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 10,779,308 | | | | | | 581,110 | | | | | | 55,444 | | | | | | 1,205,478 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 74,552 | | | | | | 16,284,414 | | |
| | Avg NEO | | | | | 2,725,992 | | | | | | (1,256,896) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 1,845,762 | | | | | | 144,056 | | | | | | 18,035 | | | | | | 484,261 | | | | | $(708,330) | | | | | | 1,186 | | | | | | 3,254,066 | | | |||
| 2021 | | | First PEO | | | | | 6,618,454 | | | | | | (4,038,338) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 6,190,509 | | | | | | 996,078 | | | | | | 38,276 | | | | | | (22,559) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 60,727 | | | | | | 9,843,147 | | |
| | Avg NEO | | | | | 2,476,273 | | | | | | (1,141,733) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 1,731,455 | | | | | | 506,431 | | | | | | 7,286 | | | | | | (8,536) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 4,531 | | | | | | 3,575,707 | | | ||
| 2020 | | | First PEO | | | | | 6,815,923 | | | | | | (4,020,436) | | | | | $(1,018,274) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 3,636,584 | | | | | | (196,412) | | | | | | 20,306 | | | | | | (216,127) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 66,716 | | | | | | 5,088,280 | | | |
| | Second PEO | | | | | 1,934,105 | | | | | | (42,259) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | (173,277) | | | | | | 42,259 | | | | | | (893,944) | | | | | | (3,138,038) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | (2,271,154) | | | ||
| | Avg NEO | | | | | 2,530,532 | | | | | | (963,934) | | | | | | (506,939) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 734,433 | | | | | | (116,406) | | | | | | 5,077 | | | | | | (126,593) | | | | | | 0 | | | | | | 1,138 | | | | | | 1,557,308 | | | ||
(5)
The amounts reported in this column reflect the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock for each of the last three fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, assume an investment of $100 on December 31, 2020, and the reinvestment of any dividends.
(6)
The peer group used in this disclosure, the Dow Jones Container and Packaging Index, is the same peer group used in the Stock Performance Graph in Part II, Item 5 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.
(7)
Base EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure which begins with Base operating profit, which excludes tax and interest and then adds back deductions for the cost of depreciation and amortization, adjusted for unbudgeted EBITDA related to acquisitions and divestitures in a given year. Base operating profit and Base EBITDA are non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation on how Base operating profit was calculated is provided in Appendix 1. As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” Base EBITDA is one of the key metrics used to determine payout under the Company’s Performance-based Annual Cash Incentive program.
Financial Performance Measures
As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. The metrics that the Company uses for both the long-term and short-term incentive awards are selected based on an objective of incentivizing the NEOs to increase shareholder value. The most important financial performance measures used by the Company to link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
Base EBITDA;
Base EPS;
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC); and
Operating Cash Flow.
ANALYSIS OF THE INFORMATION PRESENTED IN THE PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE TABLE
As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a variable pay-for-performance philosophy. While the
Sonoco 2024 Proxy Statement • 65
Company utilizes several performance measures to align executive compensation with Company performance, all of those Company measures are not presented in the Pay versus Performance table. Moreover, the Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K) for a particular year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the Company is providing the following descriptions of the relationships between information presented in the Pay versus Performance table.
CUMULATIVE TSR OF THE COMPANY VERSUS THE PEER GROUP
| | As shown in the graph below, the Company’s cumulative TSR over the four-year period presented in the table was 3.03%, while the cumulative TSR of the peer group presented for this purpose, the Dow Jones Container and Packaging Index, was 18.91% over the three years presented in the table. | | | COMPANY TSR VERSUS PEER GROUP | |
|---|
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID VERSUS CUMULATIVE TSR
As shown in the graph below, the CEO’s compensation actually paid (CAP) and the other NEOs’ average (CAP) amounts align with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the three years presented in the table.
| | The relative alignment of compensation actually paid with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the period presented is because a significant portion of the compensation actually paid to Mr. Coker and to the other NEOs is comprised of equity awards. As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company targets approximately 72% of Mr. Coker’s and 54% of the other NEO’s total target compensation awarded to be comprised of equity awards, including restricted stock units and performance-based restricted stock units. The CAP for Mr. Tiede, the former CEO, who retired in February 2020, has been excluded from this graph. | | | COMPENSATION ACTUAL PAID VS. COMPANY TSR | |
|---|
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID VERSUS NET INCOME
As shown in the graph below, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Coker and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s other NEOs as a group is generally aligned with the Company’s net income in the years 2020 and 2023. The Net Loss in 2021 is largely attributable to one-time pension settlement charges of $538.7 million being recognized in 2021. While the Company does not use net income as
66 • Sonoco 2024 Proxy Statement a performance measure in the overall executive compensation program, the measure of net income is correlated with the measure of Base EBITDA, which the Company uses when setting goals for the Company’s Performance-based Annual Cash Incentive program.
| | COMPENSATION PAID VS. NET INCOME | | | As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company targets that approximately 15% and 20% of the value of total compensation awarded to Mr. Coker and the other NEOs, respectively, consists of amounts determined under the Company Performance-based Annual Cash Incentive program. The CAP for Mr. Tiede, the former CEO, who retired in February 2020, has been excluded from this graph. | |
|---|
COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID VERSUS BASE EBITDA
As shown in the graph below, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. Coker and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s other NEOs as a group is generally aligned with the Company’s Base EBITDA over the three years presented in the table. As described above, Base EBITDA, which begins with base operating profit (“Base operating profit”), which excludes tax and interest and then adds back deductions for the cost of depreciation and amortization, adjusted for unbudgeted EBITDA related to acquisitions and divestitures in a given year. A reconciliation on how Base Operating Profit is calculated can be found in Appendix 1. While the Company uses numerous financial performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance, the Company has determined that Base EBITDA is one of the metrics which best represents the Company’s success.
As described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation—Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company targets that approximately 15% and 20% of the value of total compensation awarded to Mr. Coker
COMPENSATION PAID VS. BASE EBITDA
and the other NEOs, respectively, consists of amounts determined under the Company Performance-based Annual Cash Incentive program. The decrease in Base EBITDA in 2021 was primarily driven by the divestiture of the Display and Packaging business. The CAP for Mr. Tiede, the former CEO, who retired in February 2020, has been excluded from this graph. In 2023, Sonoco experienced a variety of challenges: Base EBITDA was negatively impacted by lower overall volumes and unfavorable metal price overlap. This was partially offset by favorable productivity and acquisitions.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE VERSUS COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID
The graphs below provide a comparison of the compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table versus compensation actually paid to Mr. Coker and average compensation actually paid to the Company’s other NEOs. The compensation for Mr. Tiede, the former CEO who retired in February 2020, has been excluded from this graph.
Sonoco believes that it is important to provide a graphic comparison that shows the different components that factor into the calculations. The compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table is based on the grant date value of equity awards granted during the applicable year and the compensation actually paid as
Sonoco 2024 Proxy Statement • 67 reported in the Pay for Performance tables is based on the fair value of equity awards granted during the applicable year and valued at year end, plus the change in value of previously granted as of year-end (or the vesting date, if earlier). In essence, the compensation actually paid reflects the fair value of all or portions of 4 years’ worth of equity awards as of specified valuation dates, while the compensation reported in Summary Compensation Table is based solely on the equity awards granted in 2023, all of which are valued based on the fair value as determined on the date of grant.
CEO: SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE VS. COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID
AVERAGE NON-CEO NEOs: SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE VS. COMPENSATION ACTUALLY PAID
68 • Sonoco 2024 Proxy Statement
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.