TERAWULF INC.
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 8, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 8, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-11-10.
0001083301-25-000099
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-08.
0001083301-26-000092
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 140 previous paragraphs and 157 current paragraphs.
39 unchanged; 44 reworded; 73 added; 56 removed; 1 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 10 previous and 10 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (73)
Current report
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, HPC leasing revenue represented a majority of total revenue for the first time, reflecting the continued ramp of long-term contracted capacity at the Lake Mariner Data Campus.
Current report
The Company has undergone a deliberate strategic transition toward HPC hosting as its primary business. While TeraWulf historically operated bitcoin mining facilities and leveraged flexible compute loads to support early infrastructure development, the Company has begun to curtail and repurpose portions of this infrastructure to support HPC development, and going forward capital allocation, development activities, and operating focus are centered on HPC data center development, long-term hosting arrangements, and infrastructure supporting AI-driven compute workloads.
Current report
Our strategy is grounded in controlling infrastructure at utility scale and pairing compute-optimized facilities with reliable, long-duration power resources. By controlling land use through ownership or long-term ground leases, together with interconnection rights, electrical and cooling infrastructure, and, where appropriate, on-site generation, the Company delivers resilient, cost-efficient capacity to hyperscale and enterprise customers under multi-year hosting arrangements. These hosting arrangements are typically structured as long-term data center leases, generally ranging from 10 to 25 years, and in certain cases benefit from investment-grade credit support, enhancing the durability and finance ability of contracted revenues. These arrangements are expected to provide long-term revenue visibility and support project-level financing as the platform scales.
Current report
This infrastructure-first approach enables TeraWulf to serve Tier-1 counterparties while maintaining operational control, development flexibility, and disciplined capital allocation.
Current report
The Company’s platform is differentiated by long-term control of utility-scale infrastructure, deep in-house power and grid expertise, and a scalable development model supported by long-term, credit-enhanced customer contracts.
Current report
Strategy Execution and Capital Allocation
Current report
Management’s execution of the Company’s strategy is focused on converting advantaged infrastructure positions into long-dated, contracted HPC capacity. This includes the phased conversion of existing infrastructure, where appropriate, to support HPC workloads. This execution model emphasizes vertical integration, long-duration customer contracts supported by credit enhancement, and phased development aligned with customer deployment schedules and power availability.
Current report
A core element of this approach is infrastructure control. By retaining control over land use, interconnection rights, electrical and cooling systems, and on-site generation where appropriate, the Company is able to manage development risk, optimize capital deployment, and maintain operational oversight throughout the lifecycle of its facilities. Management believes this approach reduces execution risk relative to third-party development models and supports infrastructure-style returns.
Current report
The Company’s contracting strategy prioritizes multi-year hosting arrangements with credit-supported counterparties, which reduces exposure to commodity-driven revenue streams, including bitcoin price volatility, as the Company’s revenue mix continues to shift toward contracted HPC leasing. These arrangements provide long-dated revenue visibility, support project-level financing, and reduce cash flow volatility as the platform scales. Credit enhancement associated with certain customer contracts has been a key factor in accelerating development timelines and enabling third-party financing.
Current report
Each campus is designed for modular, multi-phase expansion. Initial phases deliver near-term contracted capacity, while subsequent phases are aligned with customer deployment schedules and infrastructure readiness, including power availability and interconnection timing. Management believes this phased approach allows the Company to scale efficiently while maintaining capital discipline.
Current report
While the Company currently derives a significant portion of its revenue from bitcoin mining, HPC hosting is now the Company’s primary growth driver and operating focus.
Current report
Strategic Transactions
Current report
Acquisition of Beowulf E&D
Current report
The acquisition materially expanded the Company’s internal capabilities across power infrastructure development, site operations, engineering, and project execution. Approximately 94 employees transitioned to the Company as part of the transaction. Management believes this acquisition strengthened operational integration and execution capability as the Company scales its HPC platform.
Current report
Cayuga Site Ground Lease
Current report
Abernathy Joint Venture
Current report
On October 27, 2025, the Company entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement governing the Abernathy Joint Venture. The Company holds a 50.1% equity interest in the joint venture. The Abernathy HPC Campus is designed for 168 MW of critical IT load, representing the full build-out of the site. The campus is 100% pre-leased to Fluidstack under a 25-year data center sublease with contractual rent escalators and options for term contraction. Lease obligations are supported by investment-grade credit enhancement provided by Google, materially strengthening the credit profile of the contracted revenues and facilitating third-party debt financing.
Current report
Management believes the Abernathy Joint Venture reflects the extension of the Company’s commercial relationship with Fluidstack, supported by continued credit enhancement from Google, to an additional site.
Current report
Hawesville Site
Current report
In February 2026, the Company entered into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for a former industrial site in Hawesville, Kentucky (the “Hawesville Site”). The Hawesville Site is a strategically located brownfield infrastructure site which includes more than 250 buildable acres with immediate access to power infrastructure, including multiple high-voltage transmission lines, an on-site energized substation, and a direct connection to the regional transmission network. We plan on constructing and operating a HPC/AI data center on the Hawesville Site and are in discussions with potential customers for the site. The Hawesville Site has up to 480 MW of gross power availability; construction is expected to commence in 2026, with a phased buildout extending through 2027, subject to site planning and permitting approvals. Hawesville is expected to further diversify the Company’s geographic footprint and support future HPC customer demand.
Current report
Operations Overview
Current report
Lake Mariner Data Campus
Current report
The Lake Mariner Data Campus is TeraWulf’s flagship HPC campus and a core component of the Company’s contracted HPC platform. The Lake Mariner Data Campus is located in Barker, New York on the site of a former coal-fired power plant that was retired and repurposed into a modern digital infrastructure campus with operations that commenced in March 2022. The site benefits from substantial existing transmission infrastructure and is designed for scalable expansion.
Current report
As of March 31, 2026, the Lake Mariner Data Campus operated 145 MW of legacy bitcoin mining capacity and had 60 MW of critical IT HPC capacity. The campus is undergoing phased expansion to support additional HPC contracted deployments with gross capacity of approximately 500 MW in the near term,a and with potential expansion to approximately 750 MW, subject to additional approvals from the NYISO. During the quarter, certain mining facilities were curtailed or repurposed to support HPC development, consistent with the Company’s strategic transition.
Current report
The Lake Mariner Data Campus is designed to support multiple hyperscale and enterprise tenants through modular, phased development and incorporates advanced liquid-cooling systems, redundant electrical architectures, and scalable mechanical and network infrastructure optimized for high-density GPU deployments.
Current report
TeraWulf operates the Lake Mariner Data Campus through its subsidiaries La Lupa Data LLC (“La Lupa”) and Akela Data LLC (“Akela”). Collectively, La Lupa and Akela represent 438 MW of contracted critical IT HPC capacity at the Lake Mariner Data Campus, with some deliveries having commenced in 2025 and others extending into 2026.
Current report
In December 2024, La Lupa entered into long-term data center lease agreements with Core42 (the “Core42 Leases”), pursuant to which we committed to deliver 60 MW of critical IT load. The Core42 Leases have an initial ten-year term with two five-year renewal options and include customary provisions governing operating standards, service levels, and expansion rights. Construction commenced in 2024 and continued into 2025 and 2026; commissioning activities commenced in 2025 with phased deliveries aligned to meet Core42’s deployment schedule. Operationally, we continue to execute on our buildout. As of March 31, 2026, we had fully delivered CB-2, representing the full contracted capacity under the Core42 Leases currently in service.
Current report
The Akela Fluidstack Leases benefit from substantial credit support provided by Google, which supports Fluidstack’s payment and performance obligations under the leases and materially enhances the credit quality and bankability of our contracted lease revenues. This credit support was a key factor in enabling efficient financing and phased development of the Akela facilities.
Current report
Abernathy HPC Campus
Current report
The Abernathy HPC Campus reflects the extension of our relationship with Fluidstack, also supported by credit enhancement from Google, to an additional site in Texas. The campus is being developed through a joint venture in which we hold a 50.1% ownership interest.
Current report
The Abernathy HPC Campus is designed for 168 MW critical IT load, representing the full build-out of the site. This capacity is fully pre-leased to Fluidstack USA III under a 25-year data center lease with built-in rent escalators and options for term contraction (the “Abernathy Fluidstack Lease” and, together with the Akela Fluidstack Leases, the “Fluidstack Leases”). Construction is proceeding in phases, with completion and delivery currently targeted for the second half of 2026.
Current report
Similar to Akela, the Abernathy Fluidstack Lease benefits from credit support from Google, which provides financial support for Fluidstack’s obligations under the sublease, materially strengthening the risk profile of our contracted revenues and facilitating third-party financing.
Current report
Regional Diversification and Platform Resilience
Current report
The development of the Abernathy HPC Campus through the Abernathy Joint Venture and the Hawesville Site provide the Company with meaningful regional diversification. By expanding its HPC platform beyond New York into the Southwest Power Pool and Mid-continent Independent System Operator regions, the Company reduces concentration risk related to power markets, regulatory frameworks, weather events, construction timelines, and operational disruptions.
Current report
Geographic diversification also helps mitigate the potential impact of localized physical security incidents, natural disasters, and certain cyber events by distributing infrastructure across multiple regions and operating environments. Management believes this diversification enhances overall platform resilience, supports customer deployment flexibility, and strengthens the Company’s ability to maintain continuity of operations across its portfolio.
Current report
Power Strategy
Current report
The Company’s power strategy emphasizes reliability, efficiency, and responsible integration with regional electric grids. The Company’s campuses are designed to operate with long-duration, cost-competitive power resources that support both customer uptime requirements and broader grid stability.
Current report
The Company’s development and operations team brings deep experience in power generation, transmission, interconnection, and large-scale energy infrastructure, which informs site selection, facility design, and day-to-day operations. This expertise enables the Company to evaluate and develop complex, power-intensive sites efficiently and to structure infrastructure solutions that support high-density, mission-critical compute. The Company believes this power and infrastructure experience provides meaningful differentiation relative to many data center developers that do not have comparable in-house energy expertise.
Current report
As part of this strategy, the Company expects to acquire and develop sites that may include on-site generation, battery storage, and other dispatchable resources, primarily to enhance reliability for mission-critical compute and to support grid operations where appropriate. These assets are intended to improve operational resilience, enable participation in ancillary services, and and support stable, long-duration power supply for compute workloads. Rather than relying on a singular energy narrative, the Company focuses on responsible facility design, efficient power utilization, and long-term infrastructure stewardship.
Current report
The Company’s primary sources of liquidity include cash on hand, cash generated from operations, sale proceeds from bitcoin, equity issuances, debt financing, and project-level financing arrangements. As of March 31, 2026, the Company had approximately $3.1 billion of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash. Capital requirements are driven primarily by HPC data center development, including significant capital expenditures associated with site development, electrical and mechanical infrastructure, and customer-specific fit-out.
Showing the first 40 of 73 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Removed paragraphs (56)
Previous report
Our primary operations are centered at the Lake Mariner Campus, strategically located on the shores of Lake Ontario. Developed on the site of a decommissioned coal-fired power plant, this expansive facility is designed for scalable growth, with 500 MW and up to 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades. Purpose-built to support both bitcoin mining and GPU-driven HPC workloads, the Lake Mariner Campus is well-positioned to meet the rising demand for compute-intensive applications. This dual-purpose strategy enhances operational efficiency, diversifies revenue streams, and strengthens our position in the evolving digital economy.
Previous report
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the Lake Mariner Campus has 245 MW of energized capacity supporting bitcoin mining infrastructure and has energized 22.5 MW of HPC leasing capacity. TeraWulf remains on track to deliver an additional 50 MW of HPC leasing capacity under its datacenter lease agreements with Core42 Holding US LLC (“Core42”), a G42 company specializing in sovereign cloud, AI infrastructure, and digital services.
Previous report
On October 27, 2025, the Company entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement (the “Abernathy Joint Venture Agreement”) with Fluidstack CS I Inc. (the “Fluidstack Member”), an affiliate of Fluidstack USA I Inc., to govern the terms of operation of FS CS I LLC (the “Abernathy Joint Venture”), which will develop and operate an HPC datacenter located in Abernathy, Texas (the “Abernathy HPC Campus”). The Abernathy HPC Campus has been engineered for phased, large-scale deployments of liquid-cooled hyperscale compute and is supported by investment-grade credit enhancement. Pursuant to the terms of the Abernathy Joint Venture Agreement, the TeraWulf Member and the Fluidstack Member will be the sole initial members of the Abernathy Joint Venture, with the TeraWulf Member owning 50.1% of the equity interests and the Fluidstack Member owning 49.9% of the equity interests as of the date of the Abernathy Joint Venture Agreement.
Previous report
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, TeraWulf derives the majority of its revenue by providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator, facilitating transaction validation of transactions on the global bitcoin network using the Company’s fleet of application-specific integrated circuit (“ASIC”) miners. While capable of mining other digital assets, the Company has no current plans to do so.
Previous report
Bitcoin, introduced in 2008, revolutionized digital finance by enabling a decentralized system for exchanging and storing value without reliance on traditional financial institutions. It operates on a public ledger known as the “blockchain,” which records every transaction transparently and securely. This decentralized structure eliminates the need for intermediaries, enhancing transaction efficiency while making the network resilient to censorship and fraud. Unlike fiat currencies, bitcoin is not controlled by any government or central bank, reinforcing its role as a scarce, independent store of value.
Previous report
Bitcoin mining is the process of validating transactions and securing the network through proof-of-work consensus, where miners solve complex cryptographic puzzles to add new blocks to the blockchain. The network is maintained by a global pool of distributed nodes, ensuring transaction integrity and preventing double-spending. Key factors influencing mining economics include computing power, energy costs, and network difficulty, with miners competing to maximize their share of the total computational power (hashrate) deployed on the bitcoin network. As more miners participate, the network difficulty adjusts dynamically every 2,016 blocks (approximately every two weeks) to maintain a consistent block creation rate.
Previous report
Bitcoin Reward Halving
Previous report
Bitcoin’s supply issuance follows a predefined halving schedule, reducing the block reward by 50% approximately every four years. This mechanism enforces a controlled supply of bitcoin, contributing to its scarcity and long-term value proposition. The total bitcoin supply is capped at 21 million coins, and halvings will continue until this limit is reached.
Previous report
The most recent halving occurred on April 19, 2024, reducing the block reward from 6.25 to 3.125 bitcoin per block. While the halving decreases the direct mining subsidy, transaction fees remain an additional source of miner revenue. This built-in supply constraint influences mining economics and often plays a role in bitcoin’s long-term price dynamics.
Previous report
The April 2024, halving intensified competition among miners and underscores the importance of our access to low-cost power and vertically integrated business model. These advantages are increasingly critical to sustaining profitability in the post-halving environment.
Previous report
Business Strategy
Previous report
TeraWulf’s business strategy centers on the development, ownership, and operation of large-scale, power-advantaged digital infrastructure serving hyperscale and enterprise HPC workloads. Our approach is differentiated by (i) majority ownership and direct control of infrastructure, (ii) development in markets with low-cost, low-carbon, long-duration power, and (iii) contracting long-term revenue streams with Tier-1 counterparties supported by investment-grade balance sheets or guarantees.
Previous report
The strategy has three foundational elements:
Previous report
Platform Control and Vertical Integration – We own and control the critical infrastructure necessary to deliver HPC leasing capacity, including land (via long-term ground leases), interconnection rights, and cooling and electrical infrastructure. Vertical control allows us to capture infrastructure returns and maintain governance authority through development and early operations.
Previous report
Long-Duration, Credit Enhanced Contracting – Our HPC arrangements are structured as long-term datacenter leases with 10 to 25-year base terms and extension and contraction options. In both of the New York Independent System Operator (‘NYISO’) (Lake Mariner) and Southwest Power Pool (“SPP”) (Abernathy) campuses, contracted revenues are further supported by Google financial backstops in support of project debt, materially strengthening the credit profile of contracted revenues.
Previous report
Scalable Multi-Phase Buildout – Each campus is designed for modular, sequential expansion. Initial phases deliver near-term contracted capacity, while additional phases are added in line with tenant deployment schedules. This allows us to convert advantaged infrastructure positions into incremental contracted capacity efficiently.
Previous report
This combination is designed to yield durable, infrastructure-style cash flows while enabling future growth as demand for compute accelerates. The Company’s platform pipeline supports 250 MW to 500 MW of additional contracted IT load per year, supplementing the 594 MW already under contract.
Previous report
Bitcoin mining remains a complementary component of the Lake Mariner Campus, leveraging the same low-cost, low-carbon infrastructure and serving as a flexible load; however, HPC is the Company’s primary growth driver and capital allocation priority.
Previous report
Our Facilities
Previous report
Strategically located in Barker, New York, on the site of a former coal-fired power plant, the Lake Mariner Campus began operations in March 2022, designed to initially to support sustainable bitcoin mining. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, the mining facilities are capable of operating 245 MW of bitcoin mining capacity. In July 2025, TeraWulf commenced its HPC leasing operations and currently has energized 22.5 MW of HPC leasing capacity at the Lake Mariner Campus.
Previous report
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we operated bitcoin mining activities as well as commenced our HPC leasing operations at the Lake Mariner Campus. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, we also operated bitcoin mining activities at the jointly owned Nautilus Cryptomine Facility located in central Pennsylvania. In October 2024, we sold our entire equity interest in Nautilus Cryptomine LLC (“Nautilus”), allowing us to consolidate operations and reinvest in future infrastructure growth.
Previous report
The Lake Mariner HPC Datacenter
Previous report
We operate the Lake Mariner HPC Datacenter through our subsidiaries La Lupa Data LLC (“La Lupa”) and Akela Data LLC (“Akela”). At the Lake Mariner HPC Datacenter, we deliver scalable, energy-efficient and environmentally responsible datacenter solutions tailored to the rapidly growing needs of artificial intelligence, machine learning and cloud computing workloads. By leveraging our engineering expertise, scalable infrastructure, and cost-efficient power models, we aim to become a premier hosting provider for enterprises requiring high-density compute capacity. Through La Lupa and Akela, we have signed 522.5 MW of HPC leasing agreements, with operations commencing in 2025 and 2026.
Previous report
In December 2024, La Lupa entered into ten-year datacenter lease agreements with Core42 (the “Core42 Leases”), pursuant to which we committed to deliver 72.5 MW of HPC hosting capacity at the Lake Mariner Datacenter for GPU compute workloads. The Core42 Leases include two five-year renewal options and we remain in discussions with Core42 regarding future capacity.
Previous report
This project accelerates our HPC hosting expansion, positioning us at the intersection of energy and digital compute infrastructure. To support this expansion, we have expanded our digital infrastructure at the site, featuring advanced liquid cooling systems and Tier 3 redundancy. This infrastructure will be optimized for high-density compute workloads, reinforcing our ability to attract hyperscale and enterprise customers. The contracted ten-year revenues for the Core42 Leases are expected to total approximately $1.1 billion.
Previous report
Fluidstack’s obligations to pay rent under each of the Fluidstack Leases begin on the delivery of the premises for each applicable Akela project and continue for a 10-year term thereafter. The Fluidstack Leases each include two five-year renewal options at the tenant’s election.
Previous report
The Bitcoin Mining Facilities
Previous report
The Nautilus Cryptomine Facility
Previous report
Located in Berwick, Pennsylvania, Nautilus was a joint venture between TeraWulf and Talen Member. Under the Nautilus joint venture agreement and prior to the sale of TeraWulf’s interests in Nautilus in October 2024, the Company held a 25% equity interest in Nautilus and Talen held a 75% equity interest, with ownership subject to adjustments based on capital contributions. Nautilus owned and operated the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, a 200 MW bitcoin mining operation situated adjacent to the 2.5 gigawatt nuclear-powered Susquehanna Station, which was the first bitcoin mining facility site powered entirely by behind-the-meter zero-carbon nuclear energy, operating under a fixed-rate power contract of 2.0 cents per kilowatt hour (“kWh”) for a five-year term, with options for two three-year renewals.
Previous report
TeraWulf began mining bitcoin at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility in the first quarter of 2023 with an allotted 50 MW of operational bitcoin mining capacity. While holding a 25% equity stake, TeraWulf’s share of mined bitcoin was determined by relative hashrate contributions. The Company had contributed approximately 1.9 EH/s of the facility’s total 5.2 EH/s capacity, representing approximately 35.7% of the total hashrate attributed to the Company. At the time of TeraWulf’s ownership, the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility deployed approximately 48,000 miners, of which 15,800 miners were attributed to TeraWulf’s contribution to utilize is 50 MW allotment.
Previous report
In October 2024, TeraWulf sold its entire equity interest in Nautilus, allowing the Company to reallocate capital toward expanding its digital infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Campus and advancing its HPC leasing strategy. As part of the transaction, Nautilus distributed to TeraWulf all of its right, title, and interest in its miners, as well as certain other related equipment.
Previous report
Bitcoin Mining - Combined Facilities
Previous report
(1) Results as of September 30, 2024 reflect hashrate of mining operations at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities and TeraWulf’s net share of hashrate produced at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility.
Previous report
(1) Results for the three and six months ended September 30, 2024 reflect hashrate of mining operations at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities and TeraWulf’s net share of hashrate produced at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility.
Previous report
(4) Excludes bitcoin earned from profit sharing associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities and includes TeraWulf’s net share of bitcoin mined at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, based on the hashrate share attributed to the Company.
Previous report
(5) Excludes energy expenses associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities and includes TeraWulf’s net share of energy expense at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, based on aggregate nameplate power consumption of deployed miners attributed to TeraWulf’s contribution to Nautilus.
Previous report
Power costs are the most significant expense in our bitcoin mining operations, accounting for 38.9% and 50.7% of the total value of bitcoin mined for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, and 49.9% and 36.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively. The increase in power costs as a percentage of bitcoin mined for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 as compared to 2024 was primarily driven by a near doubling of network difficulty and the bitcoin reward halving in April 2024, which reduced block rewards. The increase in three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 is also driven by historically high power prices in the first quarter of 2025. These impacts were partially offset by growth in our average operating hashrate and an increase in the average market value of each bitcoin mined.
Previous report
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $7.8 and $7.8, respectively, related to the planned decommissioning of MB-3 January, including all miners and infrastructure. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $0.0 million and $5.1 million, respectively, related to certain miners whose estimated useful lives were shortened due to planned replacement by April 2024.
Previous report
On October 22, 2025, TeraWulf completed a private offering of $3,200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.75% 2030 Secured Notes. The net proceeds of the 2030 Secured Notes will be used to finance a portion of the cost of the HPC buildout at the Lake Mariner Campus.
Previous report
On October 31, 2025, the Company completed a private offering of 0.000% Convertible Senior Notes due 2032 (the “2032 Convertible Notes”). The 2032 Convertible Notes were sold under a purchase agreement, dated as of October 29, 2025, entered into by and between the Company and Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., as representatives of the several initial purchasers named therein (the “Initial Purchasers”), for resale to persons reaso nably believed to be qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The aggregate principal amount of notes sold in the offering was $1,025.0 million, which includes $125.0 million aggregate principal amount of notes issued pursuant to an option to purchase additional notes granted to the Initial Purchasers under the purchase agreement, which the Initial Purchasers exercised in full on October 30, 2025 and which additional purchase was completed on October 31, 2025. The 2032 Convertible Notes were issued at a price equal to 100% of their principal amount. The net proceeds from the sale of the 2032 Convertible Notes were approximately $999.4 million after deducting the Initial Purchasers’ discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.
Showing the first 40 of 56 passages. Open the source sections for the rest.
Reworded paragraphs (44)
Previous wording
We are a vertically integrated owner and operator of digital infrastructure assets in the United States, purpose-built to support high-performance computing (“HPC”) workloads. We develop, own, and operate large-scale, low-carbon datacenter campuses anchored by long-duration, cost-efficient power resources. Our strategy is predicated on controlling infrastructure at utility scale, enabling us to serve Tier-1 counterparties through long-term hosting arrangements.
Current wording
We are a vertically integrated owner, developer, and operator of digital infrastructure assets in the United States, purpose-built to support HPC workloads, including AI, machine learning, and advanced cloud applications.
Previous wording
On May 21, 2025 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in Beowulf Electricity & Data LLC, Beowulf E&D (MD) LLC, and Beowulf E&D (NY) LLC (collectively, “Beowulf E&D”). The fair value of total consideration for the transaction was approximately $54.6 million, including $3.0 million in cash and 5.0 million shares of Common Stock issued on the Acquisition Date. The purchase agreement also includes up to $19.0 million in contingent cash payments and up to $13.0 million in additional Common Stock, subject to the achievement of key milestones related to the expansion of the Company’s datacenter business and project financing initiative. As part of the acquisition, 94 employees of Beowulf E&D, including site staff at the Lake Mariner Campus and corporate personnel, were transitioned to TeraWulf. In addition, the existing Administrative and Infrastructure Services Agreement (the “Services Agreement”) with Beowulf E&D was terminated on the Acquisition Date.
Current wording
On May 21, 2025 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired 100% of the membership interests in Beowulf Electricity & Data LLC, Beowulf E&D (NY) LLC and Beowulf E&D (MD) LLC (collectively, “Beowulf E&D”). Additional detail regarding the consideration paid and contingent consideration associated with the Beowulf E&D acquisition is included in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
Previous wording
On August 12, 2025, the Company entered into a long term ground lease for approximately 183 acres in Lansing, New York (the “Cayuga Site”). The Cayuga Site, which, upon completion of permitting and site development, has the potential to support up to 400 MW of incremental capacity. The Cayuga Site provides a second anchor location in a low-carbon region with existing interconnection and supporting infrastructure, supporting the Company’s forward pipeline for growth.
Current wording
On August 12, 2025, the Company entered into a long-term ground lease for approximately 183 acres in Lansing, New York. Upon completion of permitting and site development, the Cayuga Site has the potential for up to 400 MW of gross capacity, supporting approximately 320 MW of critical IT load. The Cayuga Site provides an additional anchor location with existing interconnection and supporting infrastructure and represents a key component of the Company’s forward development pipeline.
Previous wording
The Lake Mariner Campus sources 100% of its power from the Zone A grid, which is characterized by low-cost, low-carbon energy. Of the campus’s total power needs, 90 MW is secured under a Power Purchase Agreement with the New York Power Authority (‘NYPA”) executed in February 2022, which provides high-load factor power under a ten-year term commencing with NYPA’s initial power delivery. The Lake Mariner Campus is built for scalable expansion, with 500 MW and potentially 750 MW with targeted transmission upgrades. Its strategic location and direct access to sustainable Zone A power make it a highly attractive site for both bitcoin mining and HPC workloads.
Current wording
The Lake Mariner Data Campus sources power from the NYISO Zone A grid, which is characterized by low-cost, low-carbon energy. Of the campus’s total power needs, 90 MW is allocated under an agreement with the New York Power Authority (“NYPA”) executed in February 2022, providing high-load factor power under a ten-year term commencing with NYPA’s initial power delivery.
Previous wording
In August 2025, Akela entered into three datacenter lease agreements (the “Fluidstack Leases”) with Fluidstack USA I Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Fluidstack”), a leading AI cloud platform. Under the Fluidstack Leases, we will provide a total of more than 360 MW of critical IT load for HPC datacenter operations at the Lake Mariner Datacenter. Akela is expected to complete construction and deliver the premises to Fluidstack in three phases in 2026 (the “Lake Mariner Datacenter Expansion”). The total budgeted cost of the construction of the Lake Mariner HPC Datacenter has been financed.
Current wording
In August 2025, Akela entered into three data center lease agreements (the “Akela Fluidstack Leases”) with Fluidstack USA I Inc. (together with its affiliates, “Fluidstack”), a leading AI cloud platform. Under the Akela Fluidstack Leases, we will provide 378 MW of critical IT load at the Lake Mariner Data Campus, which represents the majority of the remaining contracted HPC capacity at the Lake Mariner Data Campus. The Akela facilities are being developed in multiple phases, with construction having commenced in 2025 and delivery expected in 2026.
Previous wording
On October 27, 2025, the Company entered into the Abernathy Joint Venture Agreement with the Fluidstack Member to govern the terms of operation of the Abernathy Joint Venture, which will develop and operate an HPC datacenter located on the Abernathy HPC Campus.
Current wording
In October 2025, we entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement (the “Abernathy Joint Venture Agreement”) with Fluidstack CS I Inc. (the “Fluidstack Member”) to govern the terms of operation of FS CS 1 LLC (the “Abernathy Joint Venture”), which will develop, lease and operate the Abernathy HPC Campus.
Previous wording
The table below presents the lease and nonlease components of HPC lease revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024:
Current wording
The table below presents the lease and nonlease components of HPC lease revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025:
Previous wording
(2) Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation) represents power costs which are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in HPC lease revenue.
Current wording
(2) Cost of revenue (exclusive of depreciation) represents power costs which are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in HPC lease revenue as well as includes costs incurred by the Company in connection with its fit-out services under the HPC Leases.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, we owned approximately 61,500 miners, with approximately 56,100 operational at our bitcoin mining facilities on the Lake Mariner Campus (the” Bitcoin Mining Facilities”) and the remainder undergoing maintenance, awaiting disposal or on standby to replace miners under repair. These miners were comprised as follows:
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, we owned approximately 54,100 miners, with approximately 35,500 operational at our bitcoin mining facilities on the Lake Mariner Data Campus (the “LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities”) and the remainder undergoing maintenance, awaiting disposal or on standby to replace miners under repair. These miners were comprised as follows:
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, our fleet of miners ranged in age from 0.4 years to 3.3 years with an average age of approximately 1.1 year. We do not have scheduled downtime for our miners and while we periodically perform unscheduled maintenance on our miners, such downtime has not been significant historically. When performing unscheduled maintenance, depending on the length of estimated repair time, we may replace a miner with a substitute miner to limit overall downtime. As of September 30, 2025, our fleet of miners at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities had a range of energy efficiency from 15.0 to 23.0 joules per terahash (“"j/th”) and an average energy efficiency of 17.5 j/th.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, our fleet of miners ranged in age from 0.9 years to 3.8 years with an average age of approximately 1.6 years. We do not have scheduled downtime for our miners and while we periodically perform unscheduled maintenance on our miners, such downtime has not been significant historically. When performing unscheduled maintenance, depending on the length of estimated repair time, we may replace a miner with a substitute miner to limit overall downtime. As of March 31, 2026, our fleet of miners at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities had a range of energy efficiency from 15.0 to 23.0 joules per terahash (“j/th”) and has an average energy efficiency of 17.2 j/th.
Previous wording
As outlined above, several factors influence our ability to mine bitcoin profitably, including bitcoin’s USD value, mining difficulty global hashrate, power costs, fleet energy efficiency, and overall datacenter efficiency. Among these, energy efficiency is a critical driver of profitability, as power costs represent the most significant direct expense in bitcoin mining. We believe we operate a highly efficient mining fleet, optimized to maximize output while minimizing energy consumption. To assess operational performance and effectiveness, the Company tracks key metrics, which we believe are also valuable to investors for evaluating our progress and benchmarking against industry peers.
Current wording
Several factors influence our ability to mine bitcoin profitably, including bitcoin’s USD value, mining difficulty, global hashrate, power costs, fleet energy efficiency, and overall data center efficiency. Among these, energy efficiency is a critical driver of profitability, as power costs represent the most significant direct expense in bitcoin mining. We believe we operate a highly efficient mining fleet, optimized to maximize output while minimizing energy consumption. To assess operational performance and effectiveness, the Company tracks key metrics, which we believe are also valuable to investors for evaluating our progress and benchmarking against industry peers.
Previous wording
(4) While nameplate at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities was 11.6 EH/s as of September 30, 2025 and was 10.0 EH/s for TeraWulf’s two facilities as of September 30, 2024, actual operational hashrate depends on a variety of factors, including (but not limited to) performance tuning to increase efficiency and maximize margin, scheduled outages (scopes to improve reliability or performance), unscheduled outages, curtailment due to participation in various cash generating demand response programs, derate of ASICS due to adverse weather and ASIC maintenance and repair.
Current wording
(3) While nameplate at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities was 10.9 EH/s and 12.2 EH/s as of March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, actual operational hashrate depends on a variety of factors, including (but not limited to) performance tuning to increase efficiency and maximize margin, scheduled outages (scopes to improve reliability or performance), unscheduled outages, curtailment due to participation in various cash generating demand response programs, derate of ASICS due to adverse weather and ASIC maintenance and repair.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, our operational hashrate represented approximately 0.7% of the total global hashrate, aligning with our share of global blockchain rewards, which as of that date, is equivalent to approximately 4.5 bitcoin mined per day. To maintain profitably, we focus on optimizing operational efficiency and cost management, ensuring that our mining rewards consistently cover direct operating expenses.
Current wording
As of March 31, 2026, our operational hashrate represented approximately 0.9% of the total global hashrate, aligning with our share of global blockchain rewards. As of that date, this translated to approximately 1 bitcoin mined per day. To maintain profitably, we focus on optimizing operational efficiency and cost management, ensuring that our mining rewards consistently cover direct operating expenses.
Previous wording
The table below presents the average cost of mining each bitcoin for bitcoin mined at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, includes the Company’s net share of bitcoin mined at the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility and the total energy cost per kWh utilized within the facilities:
Current wording
The table below presents the average cost of mining each bitcoin, including bitcoin mined at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 and the total energy cost per kWh utilized within the facilities.
Previous wording
(2) “Cost to mine one bitcoin” is a cash cost metric and does not include depreciation. Although the Company recognizes depreciation with respect to its mining assets, it does not consider depreciation in determining whether it is economical to operate its mining equipment. As a result, the Company does not consider the sunk costs or depreciation of past capital investments in its historical or forecasted breakeven analysis. If depreciation of our miner fleet were factored into the above cost of mining analysis, it would add $70,277 and $49,335 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, bringing the total “cost to mine one bitcoin” to $115,006 and $100,858 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively. If depreciation of our miner fleet were factored into the above cost of mining analysis, it would add $28,827 and $20,477 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively, bringing the total “cost to mine one bitcoin” to $59,326 and $41,873 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.
Current wording
(1) “Cost to mine one bitcoin” is a cash cost metric and does not include depreciation. Although the Company recognizes depreciation with respect to its mining assets, it does not consider depreciation in determining whether it is economical to operate its mining equipment. As a result, the Company does not consider the sunk costs or depreciation of past capital investments in its historical or forecasted breakeven analysis. If depreciation of our miner fleet were factored into the above cost of mining analysis, it would add $79,845 and $37,316 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 respectively, bringing the total “cost to mine one bitcoin” to $79,464 and $103,472 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Previous wording
(3) Computed as the weighted-average opening price of bitcoin on each respective day the mined bitcoin is earned. Excludes bitcoin earned from profit sharing associated with a bitcoin miner hosting agreement that expired in February 2024 at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities.
Current wording
(2) Computed as the weighted-average opening price of bitcoin on each respective day the mined bitcoin is earned.
Previous wording
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, we curtailed operations at the Bitcoin Mining Facilities in response to weather events, energy price spikes, and participation in demand response programs. The Company records expected payments to be received for demand response programs as a reduction in cost of revenue, which amounted to $7.4 million and $13.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, and $4.1 million and $7.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.
Current wording
Power costs are the most significant expense in our bitcoin mining operations. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company incurred gross power costs of $14.0 million and $27.4 million, respectively. In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company curtailed operations at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities in response to weather events, energy price spikes, and participation in demand response programs. The Company records expected payments to be received for demand response programs as a reduction in cost of revenue, which amounted to $14.1 million and $2.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, there were significant curtailment periods for the Company’s bitcoin mining operations due to sustained low temperatures throughout the Northeastern United States which led to significantly reduced power consumption and significantly higher demand response proceeds for the Lake Mariner Data facility resulting in a net negative realized cost of power for the period.
Previous wording
Energy prices are highly volatile, influenced by global events that can drive nationwide fluctuations in power costs. At the Lake Mariner Campus, power costs are subject to variable market rates, which can change hourly based on wholesale electricity pricing. While this introduces some unpredictability, it also provides us with the flexibility to actively manage our energy consumption, optimizing for profitability and efficiency. Energy prices are also highly sensitive to weather conditions, such as winter storms, which can increase regional power demand and drive up costs. During such events, we may curtail operations to avoid consuming power at peak rates, or we may be curtailed under demand response programs in which we participate. The average aggregate realized power prices at the Lake Mariner Campus were $0.047 and $0.059 per kWh during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, and $0.038 and $0.039 per kWh at the Lake Mariner Campus and the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.
Current wording
Energy prices are highly volatile, influenced by global events that can drive nationwide fluctuations in power costs. At the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities, power costs are subject to variable market rates, which can change hourly based on wholesale electricity pricing. While this introduces some unpredictability, it also provides us with the flexibility to actively manage our energy consumption, optimizing for profitability and efficiency. Energy prices are also highly sensitive to weather conditions, such as winter storms and polar vortices, which can increase regional power demand and drive up costs. During such events, we may curtail operations to avoid consuming power at peak rates, or we may be curtailed under demand response programs in which we participate. The average aggregate realized power prices at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities were $(0.001) and $0.081 per kilowatt hour during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Previous wording
Our management and operations teams continuously monitor market conditions to determine when and for how long to curtail operations. If curtailment is not mandated under demand response programs, we make real-time decisions to curtail mining whenever power prices exceed the value of the fixed bitcoin reward. As a result, curtailment increases when bitcoin’s value declines or energy prices rise, and decreases when bitcoin’s value appreciates or energy costs fall. These decisions are actively managed on an hour-by-hour basis to optimize profitability.
Current wording
Our management team continuously monitors market conditions to determine when and for how long to curtail operations. If curtailment is not mandated under demand response programs, we make real-time decisions to curtail mining whenever power prices exceed the value of the fixed bitcoin reward. As a result, curtailment increases when bitcoin’s value declines or energy prices rise, and decreases when bitcoin’s value appreciates or energy costs fall. These decisions are actively managed on an hour-by-hour basis to optimize profitability.
Previous wording
While our standard depreciation period for miners is four years, historically low power costs may allow for a longer actual useful life in certain circumstances. However, if depreciation were included in the cost of mining analysis, it would add $70,277 and $49,335 per bitcoin mined for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, and $28,827 and $20,477 per bitcoin mined for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $11.9 million related to a certain miner building and related miners of which the Company shortened their useful lives based on expected shutdown of operations for purposes of supporting the HPC operations. The Company did not recorded accelerated depreciation expense during the three months ended March 31, 2025. While our standard depreciation period for miners is four years, historically low power costs may allow for a longer actual useful life in certain cases. However, if depreciation were included in the cost of mining analysis, it would add $79,845 and $37,316 per bitcoin mined for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Previous wording
The Company generates revenue in the form of bitcoin by providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator to mine bitcoin and validate transactions on the global bitcoin network using miners owned by the Company. The earned bitcoin are routinely sold for U.S. dollars. The Company also previously earned revenue by providing bitcoin miner hosting services to third parties.
Current wording
The Company generates revenue in the form of bitcoin by providing hash computation services to a mining pool operator to mine bitcoin and validate transactions on the global bitcoin network using miners owned by the Company. The earned bitcoin are routinely sold for U.S. dollars.
Previous wording
In July 2025, the Company commenced its HPC leasing operations. HPC lease revenue is generated by leasing datacenter space and providing related services to our HPC customers. These leasing agreements include lease components, nonlease components (such as power delivery, physical security, maintenance), as well as non-component elements such as taxes. Under these leases, customers pay fixed payments (based on electric capacity) and variable payments on a recurring basis. HPC power costs are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in HPC lease revenue.
Current wording
In July 2025, the Company commenced its HPC leasing operations. HPC lease revenue is generated by leasing datacenter space and providing related services to our HPC customers. These leasing agreements include lease components related to the right to use datacenter space and nonlease components for power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. HPC power costs are passed through to the customer without markup and are included on a gross basis in HPC lease revenue.
Previous wording
The Company’s business strategy centers on growing revenue and profitability by enhancing the capacity and efficiency of our bitcoin mining fleet while expanding our datacenter infrastructure to support HPC leasing activities. We plan to strategically develop the infrastructure necessary for profitability of bitcoin mining while pursuing adjacent high-value HPC leasing opportunities that leverage our power utilization and digital infrastructure. We are confident that our expertise in power infrastructure and digital asset mining can be favorably applied to the design, development, and operation of large-scale datacenters. These datacenters are optimized for high-value applications such as cloud computing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. We are actively seeking opportunities to expand into these areas using our knowledge, expertise, and existing infrastructure wherever favorable market opportunities arise.
Current wording
The Company’s business strategy centers on maximizing revenue and profitability of our bitcoin mining fleet while expanding our datacenter infrastructure to support HPC leasing activities. We plan to operate infrastructure necessary for profitable bitcoin mining while pursuing high-value HPC leasing opportunities that leverage our power utilization and digital infrastructure. We are confident our expertise in power infrastructure and digital asset mining can be favorably applied to the design, development, and operation of large-scale datacenters. These datacenters are optimized for high-value applications such as cloud computing, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. We are actively seeking opportunities to expand into these areas using our knowledge, expertise, and existing infrastructure wherever favorable market opportunities arise.
Previous wording
Total revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $50.6 million and $27.1 million, respectively, representing an increase of $23.5 million. Total revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $132.6 million and $105.1 million, respectively, representing an increase of $27.5 million. These changes were a result of the factors described below.
Current wording
Total revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $34.0 million and $34.4 million, respectively, representing a decrease of $0.4 million. These changes were a result of the factors described below.
Previous wording
HPC lease revenue for the three and nine month ended September 30, 2025 was $7.2 million. In July 2025, TeraWulf commenced its HPC leasing operations and currently has energized 22.5 MW of HPC leasing capacity at the Lake Mariner Campus.
Current wording
HPC lease revenue for the three month ended March 31, 2026 was $21.0 million. In July 2025, the Company commenced its HPC leasing operations and as of March 31, 2026, had energized 60 critical IT MW of HPC leasing capacity at the Lake Mariner Data Campus.
Previous wording
Proceeds from participation in demand response programs are recorded as a reduction in cost of revenue during the period in which the underlying program occurs. These proceeds totaled $7.4 million and $13.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, respectively, as compared to $4.1 million and $7.3 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, respectively. The Company is actively expanding its participation in such programs across New York State.
Current wording
In addition, during the three months ended March 31, 2026, the Company significantly curtailed operations at the LMD Bitcoin Mining Facilities due to sustained low temperatures in upstate New York which led to significantly lower gross power costs and significantly higher demand response proceeds resulting in a net negative realized cost of power for the period. Proceeds from participation in demand response programs are recorded as a reduction in cost of revenue in the period in which the underlying program occurs. These proceeds totaled $14.1 million and $2.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The Company is actively expanding its enrollment in such available programs in New York State.
Previous wording
Depreciation for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $26.5 million and $15.6 million, respectively, an increase of $10.9 million. Depreciation for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $60.9 million and $44.9 million, respectively, an increase of $16.0 million. The increase was primarily due to the increase in mining capacity related to infrastructure constructed and placed in service between September 30, 2024 and September 30, 2025. In addition, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $7.8 million related to a certain miner building and related miners of which the Company shortened its useful life based on expected shutdown of operations for purposes of supporting the HPC operations. The increase was partially offset by (i) decrease in depreciation on certain electrical equipment and leasehold improvements related to a change in accounting estimate of useful lives in connection with the New Ground Lease in October 2024 and (ii) accelerated depreciation expense of $5.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2024 related to certain miners of which the Company shortened their estimated useful lives based on expected replacement by April 2024.
Current wording
Depreciation for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $28.5 million and $15.6 million, respectively, an increase of $12.9 million. The increase was primarily due to mining and HPC infrastructure constructed and placed in service during 2025 at the Lake Mariner Data Campus. Additionally, during the three months ended March 31, 2026 the Company recorded accelerated depreciation expense of $11.9 million related to a certain miner building and related miners of which the Company shortened their useful life based on expected shutdown of operations for purposes of supporting the HPC operations.
Previous wording
Gain on fair value of digital assets, net during the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $0.3 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Gain on fair value of digital assets, net during the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $0.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively, due to the steady increases in the price of bitcoin during the both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and September 30, 2024.
Current wording
Loss on fair value of digital assets, net during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $0.7 million and $0.9 million due to the volatility in the price of bitcoin during the three months ended March 31, 2026 as compared to decreases in the price of bitcoin during three months ended March 31, 2025.
Previous wording
Interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 was $9.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively, an increase of $9.4 million. The increase is primarily attributed to increases in amortization of debt issuance costs as noncash interest expense for the 2030 Convertible Notes and 2031 Convertible Notes of $5.9 million and stated interest of $3.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2025. The Company fully repaid the principal balance of the Term Loans ahead of maturity in July 2024.
Current wording
Interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 was $67.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively, an increase of $63.1 million. The increase is primarily attributed to increases in stated interest of $50.5 million and increase in amortization of debt issuance costs of $12.6 million related to the 2030 Secured Notes, 2031 Convertible Notes and 2032 Convertible Notes which were issued in 2025.
Previous wording
There was no income tax benefit for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024. Based upon the level of historical U.S. losses and future projections over the period in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, at this time, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the remaining deductible temporary differences, and as a result the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its gross deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.
Current wording
Income tax provision was $28,000 and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Based upon the level of historical U.S. losses and future projections over the period in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, at this time, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefits of the remaining deductible temporary differences, and as a result the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, except for a $104,000 and $76,000 deferred tax liability as of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, arising from indefinite-lived assets (e.g., tax-deductible goodwill related to the acquisition of Beowulf E&D) that cannot be used as a source of taxable income to support the realization of deferred tax assets when a full valuation allowance is in place.
Previous wording
Equity in net (loss) income of investee, net of tax was $(2.7) million and $3.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, which represents TeraWulf’s proportional share of income of Nautilus. On October 2, 2024, the Company sold its entire 25% equity interest in Nautilus to the Talen Member.
Current wording
Equity in net loss of investee, net of tax was $11.5 million and $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025,which represents TeraWulf’s proportional share of net loss of the Abernathy Joint Venture which was formed in October 2025 and has not yet commenced operations.
Previous wording
To provide investors with additional information in connection with our results as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), we disclose Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measure. This measure is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and it should not be considered as a substitute for net loss, operating loss, or any other measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Current wording
To provide investors with additional information in connection with our results as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”), we disclose Adjusted EBITDA as a non-GAAP measure. This measure is not a financial measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and it should not be considered as a substitute for net loss, operating loss, or any other measure calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
Previous wording
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss adjusted for (i) impacts of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (ii) stock-based compensation expense, amortization of right-of-use asset, related party expense settled with respect to Common Stock, which are noncash items that the Company believes are not reflective of its general business performance and for which the accounting requires management judgment, and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies; (iii) equity in net income of investee, net of tax, related to Nautilus; (iv) interest income which management believes is not reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities; (v) acquisition-related transaction costs which management believes is not reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities; and (vi) change in fair value of contingent consideration, change in fair value of warrant and derivative liabilities, loss on extinguishment of debt and loss on disposals of property, plant and equipment, which are not reflective of the Company’s general business performance. The Company’s Adjusted EBITDA also included the impact of distributions from investee received in bitcoin related to a return on the Nautilus investment, which management believes, in conjunction with excluding the impact of equity in net income of investee, net of tax, is reflective of assets available for the Company’s use in its ongoing operations as a result of its investment in Nautilus.
Current wording
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net loss adjusted for (i) impacts of interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; (ii) stock-based compensation expense, amortization of right-of-use asset and accretion of asset retirement obligations, which are non-cash items that the Company believes are not reflective of its general business performance, and for which the accounting requires management judgment, and the resulting expenses could vary significantly in comparison to other companies; (iii) equity in net loss of investee, net of tax, related to the Abernathy Joint Venture; (iv) interest income for which management believes is not reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities; (v) change in fair value of warrant liabilities, and impairment of property, plant and equipment, net, which are not reflective of the Company’s general business performance; and (vi) acquisition-related transaction costs which management believes are not reflective of the Company’s ongoing operating activities.
Previous wording
Management believes that providing this non-GAAP financial measure allows for meaningful comparisons between the Company's core business operating results and those of other companies, and provides the Company with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating its own core business operating results over different periods of time. In addition to management's internal use of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is also useful to investors and analysts in comparing the Company’s performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. Management believes the foregoing to be the case even though some of the excluded items involve cash outlays and some of them recur on a regular basis (although management does not believe any of such items are normal operating expenses necessary to generate the Company’s bitcoin related revenues). For example, the Company expects that share-based compensation expense, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, will continue to be a significant recurring expense over the coming years and is an important part of the compensation provided to certain employees, officers, directors and consultants. Additionally, management does not consider any of the excluded items to be expenses necessary to generate the Company’s bitcoin related revenue.
Current wording
Management believes that providing this non-GAAP financial measure allows for meaningful comparisons between the Company's core business operating results and those of other companies, and provides the Company with an important tool for financial and operational decision making and for evaluating its own core business operating results over different periods of time. In addition to management's internal use of non-GAAP Adjusted EBITDA, management believes that Adjusted EBITDA is also useful to investors and analysts in comparing the Company’s performance across reporting periods on a consistent basis. Management believes the foregoing to be the case even though some of the excluded items involve cash outlays and some of them recur on a regular basis (although management does not believe any of such items are normal operating expenses necessary to generate the Company’s revenues). For example, the Company expects that share-based compensation expense, which is excluded from Adjusted EBITDA, will continue to be a significant recurring expense over the coming years and is an important part of the compensation provided to certain employees, officers, directors and consultants.
Previous wording
Cash provided by financing activities from continuing operations was $806.0 million and $33.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is primarily attributed to the net proceeds from the issuance of the 2031 Convertible Notes of $975.3 million. The increase was partially offset by the purchase of capped calls of $100.6 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, the Company repurchased $33.3 million and $0 of treasury stock under the Share Repurchase Program, respectively, and paid $28.3 million and $16.8 million in taxes related to net share settlements of stock-based compensation awards, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, financing activities included $188.7 million in proceeds from issuances of Common Stock, partially offset by $139.4 million in principal repayments on long-term debt.
Current wording
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities was $100.4 million and $(51.3) million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The increase in cash provided by financing activities is primarily attributed to (i) $92.8 million of net proceeds from borrowings under the Bridge Credit Agreement, net of debt issuance costs paid, and (ii) $9.0 million of net proceeds from sales of Common Stock under the ATM Program. During the three months ended March 31, 2025, the Company repurchased $33.3 million of treasury stock under the Share Repurchase Program and paid $18.0 million in taxes related to net share settlements of stock-based compensation awards.
Previous wording
As of September 30, 2025, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $711.3 million, a working capital balance of $23.3 million, total stockholders’ equity of $247.3 million and an accumulated deficit of $867.1 million. The Company incurred a net loss of $534.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025. The Company began mining bitcoin in March 2022 and has 11.6 EH/s of operating capacity at the Lake Mariner Campus as of the date of this Quarterly Report. To date, the Company has relied primarily on proceeds from sale of bitcoin, both self-mined and distributed from the joint venture which owned the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, rent prepayments, and its issuances of debt and equity to fund its principal operations.
Current wording
The Company incurred a net loss of $427.7 million and reported cash provided by operating activities of $17.6 million for three months ended March 31, 2026. As of March 31, 2026, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $2,630.0 million, a working capital balance of $482.6 million, total TeraWulf stockholders’ deficit of $78.8 million and an accumulated deficit of $1,421.3 million. During 2025, the Company leveraged its strategic transition toward HPC leasing and execution of long-term lease agreements with Fluidstack, which benefit from substantial credit support provided by Google, to enable efficient financing and funding of the phased development of the La Lupa and Akela facilities. Prior to these developments, the Company historically relied primarily on proceeds from sales of digital assets, both self-mined and distributed from the joint venture which owned the Nautilus Cryptomine Facility, and its issuances of debt and equity to fund its principal operations.
Previous wording
In December 2024, the Company entered into long-term datacenter lease agreements (the “HPC Leases”) with a customer for specified datacenter infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Campus to support the customer’s HPC operations. In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company determined at contract inception that these agreements contained a lease, comprising lease components related to the right to use datacenter space and nonlease components for power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. Certain of the HPC Leases commenced in 2025 and the remainder of the HPC Leases are expected to commence in 2026.
Current wording
In December 2024, the Company entered into long-term datacenter lease agreements (the “HPC Leases”) with a customer for specified datacenter infrastructure at the Lake Mariner Data Campus to support the customer’s HPC operations. In accordance with ASC 842, Leases, the Company determined at contract inception that these agreements contained a lease, comprising lease components related to the right to use datacenter space and nonlease components for power delivery, physical security, and maintenance services. Certain of the HPC Leases commenced in 2025 and the remainder of the HPC Leases are expected to commence in 2026.
Previous wording
The Company has concluded that it is probable that substantially all of the payments will be collected over the term of the arrangements and recognize the total combined fixed payments under the agreements on a straight-line basis over the noncancellable term. The Company recognizes the difference between straight-line revenue recognized during the period and the lease payments due pursuant to the underlying arrangement as deferred rent liability or accrued rent receivable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Certain arrangements include options to extend the term. These extension options are not reasonably certain to be exercised and are excluded from the lease term and calculation of lease payments at lease commencement.
Current wording
The Company has concluded that it is probable that substantially all of the payments will be collected over the term of the arrangements and recognize the total combined fixed payments under the agreements on a straight-line basis over the noncancellable term. The Company recognizes the difference between straight-line revenue recognized during the period and the lease payments due pursuant to the underlying arrangement as deferred rent liability or accrued rent receivable in the consolidated balance sheets. Certain arrangements include options to extend the term. These extension options are not reasonably certain to be exercised and are excluded from the lease term and calculation of lease payments at lease commencement.
Previous wording
Payments for physical security and other routine maintenance services are included in the fixed lease payments. The lease agreements provide for variable payments for power delivery and other services. Power delivery services represent a stand-ready obligation to make power available to the customer over the coterminous lease term and have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components. Customers are charged monthly for actual power costs incurred at current utility rates and fees incurred on other services. These payments from customers for power delivery and other services are recognized as variable lease payments in accordance with the practical expedient elected. Variable lease payments are presented on a gross basis and are included in HPC lease revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Current wording
Payments for physical security and other routine maintenance services are included in the fixed lease payments. The lease agreements provide for variable payments for power delivery. Power delivery services represent a stand-ready obligation to make power available to the customer over the coterminous lease term and have the same pattern of transfer as the related operating lease components. Customers are charged monthly for actual power costs incurred at current utility rates. These payments from customers for power delivery are recognized as variable lease payments in accordance with the practical expedient elected. Variable lease payments are presented on a gross basis and are included in HPC lease revenue in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Previous wording
Digital assets consists of bitcoin earned as noncash consideration for providing hash computation services to a mining pool. Digital assets is classified as an intangible asset with indefinite useful life and presented as a current asset on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, based on the Company’s ability to sell bitcoin in a highly liquid market and its expectation to convert these holdings to cash within the next twelve months. Effective January 1, 2024, the Company early adopted ASU 2023-08, which requires digital assets to be measured at fair value each reporting period in accordance with ASC 820, with changes in fair value recognized as net income. Gains and losses from the remeasurement of digital assets are recorded in “(gain) loss on fair value of digital assets, net” within the consolidated statements of operations. Similarly, realized gains and losses from bitcoin sales - measured as the difference between the cash proceeds and the cost basis, determined on a first-in, first-out basis - are also reported within this line item.
Current wording
Digital assets consists of bitcoin earned as noncash consideration for providing hash computation services to a mining pool in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. Digital assets is classified as a current asset in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as it is highly liquid and the Company expects to sell it within the next twelve months to support operations.
Showing the first 40 of 44 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Bitcoin earned through mining activities is recorded as an adjustment in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, reconciling net loss to cash flows from operating activities. Bitcoin received as distributions-in-kind from equity investees is disclosed in supplemental noncash investing activities.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
(1) Certain of the Core42 Leases commenced in 2025 which comprised 22.5 MW of HPC lease capacity as of September 30, 2025. The remainder of the HPC Leases are expected to commence in 2026.