PLATINUM GROUP METALS LTD
For the period ended May 31, 2024. Filed Jul 11, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What a company based outside the US has published at home or sent to its shareholders. It is how many foreign companies share results and news between annual reports.
May 31, 2024 · Filed Jul 11, 2024
Use the contents to explore the available documents and sections.
Contents
EX-99.2 · Notes:
Notes:
(1) 4E elements are platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold.
(2) Cut-offs for mineral resources were established by a QP after a review of potential operating costs and other factors.
(3) Conversion factor used for kilograms ("kg") to ounces ("oz") is 32.15076.
(4) A 5% and 7% geological loss was applied to the measured/indicated and inferred mineral resources categories, respectively.
(5) The mineral resources are classified in accordance with NI 43-101. Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability and inferred mineral resources have a high degree of uncertainty.
(6) The mineral resources are provided on a 100% Project basis, inferred and indicated categories are separate and the estimates have an effective date of September 4, 2019.
PLATINUM GROUP METALS LTD. (A Development Stage Company)Supplementary Information and MD&AFor the period ended May 31, 2024
(7) Mineral resources were completed by Mr. CJ Muller of CJM Consulting.
(8) Mineral resources were estimated using kriging methods for geological domains created in Datamine from 441 mother holes and 583 deflections. A process of geological modelling and creation of grade shells using indicating kriging was completed in the estimation process.
(9) The mineral resources may be materially affected by metal prices, exchange rates, labour costs, electricity supply issues or many other factors detailed in the Company's 2023 AIF.
(10) The data that formed the basis of the mineral resources estimate are the drill holes drilled by Platinum Group as project operator, which consist of geological logs, drill hole collars surveys, downhole surveys and assay data. The area where each layer was present was delineated after examination of the intersections in the various drill holes.
(11) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
Proven Mineral Reserve Estimate at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off, effective September 4, 2019, on 100% Project basis
| Proven Mineral Reserve Estimate at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt · Pd · Rh · Au · 4E · Cu · Ni · 4E Metal | ||||||||||
| Zone | Tonnes | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | Kg | Moz |
| T Zone | 3,963,694 | 1.02 | 1.84 | 0.04 | 0.73 | 3.63 | 0.13 | 0.07 | 14,404 | 0.463 |
| F Central | 17,411,606 | 0.94 | 2.18 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.31 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 57,738 | 1.856 |
| F South | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
| F North | 16,637,670 | 0.85 | 2.03 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.09 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 51,378 | 1.652 |
| F Boundary North | 4,975,853 | 0.97 | 2.00 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.18 | 0.10 | 0.22 | 15,847 | 0.509 |
| F Boundary South | 5,294,116 | 1.04 | 2.32 | 0.05 | 0.18 | 3.59 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 19,020 | 0.611 |
| F Zone Total | 44,319,244 | 0.92 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.25 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 143,982 | 4.629 |
| Waterberg Project Total | 48,282,938 | 0.93 | 2.10 | 0.05 | 0.20 | 3.28 | 0.09 | 0.19 | 158,387 | 5.092 |
Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off, effective September 4, 2019, on 100% Project basis
| Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt · Pd · Rh · Au · 4E · Cu · Ni · 4E Metal | ||||||||||
| Zone | Tonnes | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | Kg | Moz |
| T Zone | 12,936,870 | 1.23 | 2.10 | 0.02 | 0.82 | 4.17 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 53,987 | 1.736 |
| F Central | 52,719,731 | 0.86 | 1.97 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.02 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 158,611 | 5.099 |
| F South | 15,653 ,961 | 1.06 | 2.03 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 3.29 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 51,411 | 1.653 |
| F North | 36,984,230 | 0.90 | 2.12 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.23 | 0.09 | 0.20 | 119,450 | 3.840 |
| F Boundary North | 13,312,581 | 0.98 | 1.91 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 3.11 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 41,369 | 1.330 |
| F Boundary South | 7,616,744 | 0.92 | 1.89 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 2.98 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 22,737 | 0.731 |
| F Zone Total | 126,287,248 | 0.91 | 2.01 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 3.12 | 0.08 | 0.18 | 393,578 | 12.654 |
| Waterberg Project Total | 139,224,118 | 0.94 | 2.02 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 3.22 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 447,564 | 14.390 |
Proven & Probable Mineral Reserve Estimate at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off, effective September 4, 2019, on 100% Project basis
| Total Estimated Mineral Reserve at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt · Pd · Rh · Au · 4E · Cu · Ni · 4E Metal | ||||||||||
| Zone | Tonnes | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | Kg | Moz |
| T Zone | 16,900,564 | 1.18 | 2.04 | 0.03 | 0.80 | 4.05 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 68,391 | 2.199 |
PLATINUM GROUP METALS LTD. (A Development Stage Company)Supplementary Information and MD&AFor the period ended May 31, 2024
| Total Estimated Mineral Reserve at 2.5 g/t 4E cut-off | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt · Pd · Rh · Au · 4E · Cu · Ni · 4E Metal | ||||||||||
| Zone | Tonnes | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (g/t) | (%) | (%) | Kg | Moz |
| F Central | 70,131,337 | 0.88 | 2.02 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 3.09 | 0.07 | 0.18 | 216,349 | 6.956 |
| F South | 15,653,961 | 1.06 | 2.03 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 3.29 | 0.04 | 0.13 | 51,411 | 1.653 |
| F North | 53,621,900 | 0.88 | 2.09 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 3.18 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 170,828 | 5.492 |
| F Boundary North | 18,288,434 | 0.98 | 1.93 | 0.05 | 0.17 | 3.13 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 57,216 | 1.840 |
| F Boundary South | 12,910,859 | 0.97 | 2.06 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 3.23 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 41,756 | 1.342 |
| F Zone Total | 170,606,492 | 0.91 | 2.04 | 0.05 | 0.15 | 3.15 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 537,560 | 17.283 |
| Waterberg Project Total | 187,507,056 | 0.94 | 2.04 | 0.05 | 0.21 | 3.24 | 0.09 | 0.18 | 605,951 | 19.482 |
Notes:
(1) The estimated mineral reserves have an effective date of September 4, 2019.
(2) A 2.5 g/t 4E stope cut-off grade was used for mine planning for the T Zone and the F Zone mineral reserves estimate. The cut-off grade considered April 2018 metal spot prices.
(3) Tonnes and grade estimates include planned dilution, geological losses, external overbreak dilution, and mining losses.
(4) 4E elements are platinum, palladium, rhodium and gold.
(5) Numbers may not add due to rounding.
The Waterberg Project financial performance has been estimated both at Spot Prices and at Three Year Trailing Prices as set out in the table below. The long-term real US$/Rand exchange rate for the Spot Price scenario is set at 15.00, which is based on an intra-day traded spot rate as of September 4, 2019. The US$/Rand exchange rates for the Three-Year Trailing Price scenario, is based on Bloomberg's nominal consensus forward-curve as at June 2019, which translates into a long-term real US$/Rand rate of 15.95. The price deck assumptions for each scenario are tabled below.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.