NVIDIA CORP
For the period ended Jun 26, 2024. Filed May 14, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Jun 26, 2024 · Filed May 14, 2024
Contents
PROXY SUMMARY
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement carefully before voting.
2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
| Date and time: | Wednesday, June 26, 2024 at 9:00 a.m. Pacific Daylight Time |
|---|---|
| Location: | Virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/NVDA2024 |
| Record date: | Stockholders as of April 29, 2024 are entitled to vote |
| Admission to meeting: | You will need your Control Number to attend the 2024 Meeting |
Voting Matters and Board Recommendations
A summary of the 2024 Meeting proposals is below. Every stockholder’s vote is important. Our Board urges you to vote your shares FOR Proposals 1, 2, and 3. Our Board has elected not to make a voting recommendation with respect to Proposal 4.
| Matter · Page · Board Recommends · Vote Required for Approval · Effect of Abstentions · Effect of Broker Non-Votes | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Management Proposals: | ||||||
| 1 | Election of twelve directors | 15 | FOR each director nominee | More FOR than AGAINST votes | None | None |
| 2 | Advisory approval of our executive compensation | 42 | FOR | Majority of shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this matter | Against | None |
| 3 | Ratification of the selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2025 | 65 | FOR | Majority of shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this matter | Against | N/A (1) |
| Stockholder Proposal: | ||||||
| 4 | Simple Majority Vote | 68 | No voting recommendation | Majority of shares present, in person or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on this matter | Against | None |
(1) Because this is a routine proposal, there are no broker non-votes.
Election of Directors (Proposal 1)
The following table provides summary information about each director nominee:
| Name · Age · Director Since · Independent · Financial Expert (1) · Committee Membership · Other Public Company Boards | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert K. Burgess | 66 | 2011 | ü | ü | CC | ||
| Tench Coxe | 66 | 1993 | ü | CC | 1 | ||
| John O. Dabiri | 44 | 2020 | ü | CC | |||
| Persis S. Drell | 68 | 2015 | ü | NCGC | |||
| Jen-Hsun Huang | 61 | 1993 | |||||
| Dawn Hudson | 66 | 2013 | ü | ü | CC Chairperson | 1 | |
| Harvey C. Jones | 71 | 1993 | ü | ü | AC, CC, NCGC (2) | ||
| Melissa B. Lora | 61 | 2023 | ü | ü | AC | 1 | |
| Stephen C. Neal(Lead Director) | 75 | 2019 | ü | NCGC Chairperson | |||
| A. Brooke Seawell | 76 | 1997 | ü | ü | AC Chairperson | 1 | |
| Aarti Shah | 59 | 2020 | ü | AC, CC (3) | 1 | ||
| Mark A. Stevens | 64 | 2008 | (4) | ü | AC, NCGC | ||
(1) Qualified as an AC financial expert.
(2) Mr. Jones will serve on the CC until the 2024 Meeting. After the 2024 Meeting, he will serve on the AC and continue to serve on the NCGC.
(3) Dr. Shah will serve on the CC and continue to serve on the AC after the 2024 Meeting.
(4) Previously served as a member of our Board from 1993 until 2006.
Recent Refreshment, Board Demographics, and Nominee Qualifications
Our director nominees exhibit a variety of competencies, professional experience, and backgrounds, and contribute diverse viewpoints and perspectives to our Board. While the Board benefits from the experience and institutional knowledge that our longer-serving directors bring, it has also brought in new perspectives and ideas through the appointment ofthree new directors since 2020. The Board also regularly rotates committee membership and chairpersons to promote a diversity of viewpoints on the Board committees.
The Board and the NCGC continue to seek highly qualified women and individuals from underrepresented groups to include in the initial pool of potential director nominees, as discussed below under Director Qualifications and Nomination of Directors. The Board’s commitment to achieving a diverse and inclusive membership is demonstrated by our director nominees. Four of our directors are women and three are ethnically and/or racially diverse. Our three newest members enhance the Board’s gender, ethnic, and/or racial diversity.
Mark L. Perry and Michael G. McCaffery are not seeking re-election and their Board service will end on the date of the 2024 Meeting. Effective as of the date of the 2024 Meeting, the size of our Board will be reduced to 12 members.
Nominee Demographics
Nominee Skills, Competencies, and Attributes
Below are the skills, competencies, and attributes that our NCGC and Board consider important for our directors to have, considering our current business and future market opportunities, and the director nominees who possess them:
| Senior Leadership & Operations Experience | Industry & Technical | Financial /Financial Community | Governance & Public Company Board | Emerging Technologies & Business Models | Marketing, Communications & Brand Management | Regulatory, Legal & Risk Management | Human Capital Management Experience | Diversity | |
| Burgess | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coxe | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||
| Dabiri | ü | ü | ü | ||||||
| Drell | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||
| Huang | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü |
| Hudson | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||
| Jones | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||
| Lora | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||
| Neal | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||
| Seawell | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ||||
| Shah | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | ü | |
| Stevens | ü | ü | ü | ü | |||||
Corporate Governance Highlights
Our Board is committed to strong corporate governance to promote the long-term interests of the Company and our stockholders. We seek a collaborative approach to stockholder issues that affect our business and to ensure that our stockholders see our governance and executive pay practices as well-structured. In the Fall of 2023, we contacted our top institutional stockholders, representing an aggregate ownership of 31%, to gain insights into their views on corporate sustainability practices, and diversity and inclusion.
Highlights of our corporate governance practices include:
| ü All Board members independent, except for our CEOü Independent Lead Directorü Proxy accessü Declassified Boardü Majority voting for directorsü Active Board oversight of enterprise risk and risk managementü Stockholders can call a special meeting | ü 75% or greater attendance by each Board member at meetings of the Board and applicable committeesü Independent directors frequently meet in executive sessionsü At least annual Board and committee self-assessments ü Annual stockholder outreach, including Lead Director participationü Stock ownership guidelines for our directors and NEOs |
|---|
Advisory Approval of Executive Compensation for Fiscal 2024 (Proposal 2)
We are asking our stockholders to cast a non-binding vote, also known as “say-on-pay,” to approve our NEOs’ compensation. The Board believes that our compensation policies and practices are effective in achieving our goals of paying for performance; providing competitive pay so that we may attract and retain a high-caliber executive team; aligning our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders to create long-term value; and achieving simplicity and transparency with our compensation program. The Board and our stockholders have approved holding our “say-on-pay” votes annually.
Executive Compensation Highlights
Our executive compensation program is designed to pay for performance. We utilize compensation elements that align our NEOs’ interests with those of our stockholders to create long-term value. Our NEOs’ compensation is heavily weighted toward performance-based, “at-risk” variable cash and long-term equity awards that are only earned if the Company achieves pre-established corporate financial metrics, subject to caps on maximum payout. For the last several years, over 90% of our CEO’s and over 50% of our other NEOs’ target pay has been performance-based and at-risk, and 100% of our CEO’s equity awards have been in the form of PSUs.
To motivate our NEOs to focus on operational efficiencies and providing value-added products, the CC provided our executives with an opportunity to earn Additional SY PSUs if we achieved (i) Fiscal 2024 Non-GAAP Operating Income at or above Base Compensation Plan and (ii) a Fiscal 2024 Non-GAAP Gross Margin goal. In light of an increasingly complex macroeconomic environment, the CC set (a) Base Compensation Plan goals close to actual performance for Fiscal 2023 and (b) Stretch Compensation Plan goals at levels that would require year-over-year growth, representing extremely strong financial performance to further align corporate performance and executive pay.
Financial Performance and Link to Executive Pay
As described further in our CD&A, a significant portion of our executive pay opportunities are tied to the achievement of financial measures that drive business value and contribute to our long-term success. The table below shows our goals for the applicable periods that were completed at the end of Fiscal 2024 and their respective impact on our executive pay.
| PERFORMANCE GOALS | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable Cash Plan · SY PSUs · MY PSUs | ||||||
| Fiscal 2024 Revenue | Payout as a % of Target Opportunity | Fiscal 2024 Non-GAAP Operating Income (1) | Shares Eligible to Vest as a % of Target Opportunity | Fiscal 2022 to 2024 3-Year Relative TSR | Shares Eligible to Vest as a % of Target Opportunity | |
| Threshold | $20.0 billion | 20% | $4.6 billion | 20% | 25th percentile | 25% |
| Base Compensation Plan | $26.0 billion | 100% | $9.4 billion | 100% | 50th percentile | 100% |
| Stretch Compensation Plan | $29.5 billion | 200% | $11.9 billion | CEO 150% Other NEOs 200%Additional 50% possible for all NEOs (2) | 75th percentile | CEO 150% Other NEOs 200% |
| PERFORMANCE ACHIEVEMENT AND PAYOUTS | ||||||
| Variable Cash Plan · SY PSUs · MY PSUs | ||||||
| Performance Achievement for Period Ended Fiscal 2024 (3) | $60.9 billion revenue | $37.1 billion Non-GAAP Operating Income (1)For Additional SY PSUs only, 73.8% Non-GAAPGross Margin (1) | 99th percentile 3-year TSR relative to S&P 500 | |||
| Payout as % of Target Opportunity | 200% | With Additional SY PSUs, CEO 200%Other NEOs 250% | CEO 150%Other NEOs 200% | |||
(1) See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures below in our CD&A for a reconciliation between the non-GAAP financial measures and GAAP results.
(2) Contingent upon the Company achieving (a) Fiscal 2024 Non-GAAP Operating Income at Base Compensation Plan of $9.4 billion or more and (b) Fiscal 2024 Non-GAAP Gross Margin of 68.5% or more.
(3) See Performance Metrics and Goals for Executive Compensation below in our CD&A for a description and further discussion of revenue, Non-GAAP Operating Income, Non-GAAP Gross Margin, and 3-year relative TSR.
Ratification of Selection of PwC as our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for Fiscal 2025 (Proposal 3)
Although not required, we are asking our stockholders to ratify the AC’s selection of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for Fiscal 2025 because we believe it is a matter of good corporate practice. If our stockholders do not ratify the selection, the AC will reconsider the appointment, but may nevertheless retain PwC. Even if the selection is ratified, the AC may select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of NVIDIA and our stockholders.
Stockholder Proposal: Simple Majority Vote (Proposal 4)
A stockholder is asking our Board to take steps to replace the supermajority voting provisions in our Charter and Bylaws with a simple majority standard. The proposal is advisory only, and our Board does not recommend a vote either for or against the proposal. Approval of the proposal would not, by itself, implement a majority voting standard, and our Board and our stockholders would need to take subsequent action to replace the supermajority voting provisions in our Charter and Bylaws with a simple majority standard.
Corporate Sustainability
NVIDIA invents computing technologies that improve lives and address global challenges. Our goal is to integrate sound CS principles and practices into every aspect of the Company. This proxy statement covers the following CS topics:
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.