ONEOK INC /NEW/
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 24, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 24, 2026
OKE$85.19-1.2%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-25.
0001039684-25-000036
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-24.
0001039684-26-000006
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 219 previous paragraphs and 218 current paragraphs.
153 unchanged; 60 reworded; 4 added; 6 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (4)
Current report
In addition, scrutiny regarding climate change and other ESG matters has resulted in an increased likelihood of governmental investigations, regulation, shareholder activism and private litigation by both advocates and opponents of such matters, which could increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our business. For example, while some policymakers (including certain states and the SEC under the previous administration) have adopted, or are considering adopting, requirements for the disclosure of climate risks or other information, other policymakers have sought to constrain companies’ considerations of ESG matters. Any failure to successfully navigate stakeholder expectations, including regulatory developments, may result in reputational harm, increased costs or other adverse impacts.
Current report
We engage in various efforts to respond to stakeholder expectations; however, such efforts may not have the desired effect. Many of these efforts rely on methodologies, assumptions and data (including third-party information) that are subject to varying interpretations or that continue to evolve, including in ways we cannot control. Our approach may also continue to evolve, and we cannot guarantee that our approach will align with the expectations or preferences of any particular stakeholder. For example, our emissions reduction targets depend on a range of factors, and to the extent these do not manifest or we otherwise are unable to make progress on such targets or other initiatives, we may face additional costs or be unable to meet our targets, which could negatively impact our business and reputation. Various of our business partners and other stakeholders are subject to similar expectations on ESG matters, which may exacerbate or result in additional risks.
Current report
•National Environmental Policy Act and analogous state laws that establish requirements for certain environmental analyses prior to major government actions, including discretionary permits;
Current report
Upon entering office, the new administration issued a series of executive orders that signal a shift in the United States’ energy, environmental and climate change policy. Among other directives, such executive orders: (i) direct federal agencies to identify and exercise emergency authorities to facilitate conventional energy production, transportation and refining and call for the use of emergency regulations to expedite energy infrastructure projects; (ii) promote energy explorations and production on federal lands and waters; (iii) mandate a review of existing regulations that may burden domestic energy development; and (iv) rescission of funds and programs related to the IRA and Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. We continue to assess the long-term impacts of such actions on our operations, if any. However, such actions may prompt various states and other policymakers to take more stringent action on such matters. Therefore, the net impact of any developments is difficult to predict with any certainty.
Removed paragraphs (6)
Previous report
In addition, increasing attention to climate change has resulted in an increased likelihood of governmental investigations, regulation, shareholder activism and private litigation, which could increase our costs or otherwise affect adversely our business. For example, the SEC finalized new climate change disclosure requirements in March 2024 but stayed the rules in April 2024 pending judicial review of several lawsuits filed by states, industry and environmental groups challenging the rule. It is unclear when the rules will become effective, if at all. If these or any other climate disclosure requirements become effective, we may face increased costs associated with complying with such new climate disclosure rules.
Previous report
Certain investors are increasingly focused on ESG issues, including climate change. Further, organizations that provide information to investors on corporate governance and related matters have also increased their focus on ESG issues and have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on various ESG initiatives. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to increased negative investor sentiment toward us or midstream companies in general. Due to climate change concerns, some investors may choose not to invest, or to reduce investment, in companies that explore for, produce, process, transport or sell products derived from hydrocarbons. If this negative investor sentiment increases, we may see reduced demand for our securities, which could impact our liquidity or the value of our securities. Additionally, certain large institutional lenders have announced their own policies to meet publicly announced climate commitments, which often involve commitments to shift lending activities in the energy sector to meet GHG emissions goals. As a result, certain institutional lenders may impose additional requirements on us, or decide not to lend to us, based on ESG concerns, which could adversely affect our access to capital on reasonable terms or at all and, as a result, our financial condition. To the extent financial markets view climate change and emissions of GHGs as a financial risk, this could also negatively affect our ability to access capital or cause us to receive less favorable terms and conditions in future financings.
Previous report
In 2021, we announced a companywide absolute GHG emissions reduction target of 2.2 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents from our combined Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions by 2030 for our legacy ONEOK assets. The target represents a 30% reduction in combined operational Scope 1 and location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions attributable to ONEOK assets as of Dec. 31, 2019. To the extent that the potential pathways we have identified to achieve this emissions reduction target are not available to us, or to the extent we otherwise are unable to make progress toward other ESG-related targets we may establish, we may face additional costs to meet these targets, or we may fail to meet them, which could negatively impact our business and reputation.
Previous report
We may be unable to integrate the businesses of EnLink and Medallion successfully or realize the anticipated benefits of the EnLink Acquisitions and the Medallion Acquisition (collectively, the “Recent Acquisitions”).
Previous report
The success of the Recent Acquisitions will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the anticipated benefits from combining the businesses of ONEOK, EnLink and Medallion. If the businesses are not successfully combined, the anticipated benefits of the Recent Acquisitions may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected. In addition, the integration may result in additional and unforeseen expenses and potential unknown liabilities, which could reduce the anticipated benefits of the Recent Acquisitions. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, as well as the disruption of our ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in our standards, controls, procedures and policies. Any or all of those occurrences could affect adversely the combined company’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees after the Recent Acquisitions or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the Recent Acquisitions. Integration efforts between the three companies will also divert management attention and resources. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous report
Following the EnLink Controlling Interest Acquisition, we began to integrate certain aspects of EnLink’s business and operations with ours, but EnLink has continued to operate as a separate public company. In connection with the completion of the EnLink Acquisition, EnLink ceased to operate as a separate public company, and we began full integration with our business. This integration process is expected to be subject to some or all of the aforementioned challenges many of which may be more complex as a result of having to fully integrate the EnLink business. Further, this integration process may pose additional difficulties inherent with fully integrating the EnLink business and the discontinuation of its operation as a separate public company. If we are unable to successfully execute our integration strategy, we may be unable to realize some or all of the anticipated benefits of the EnLink Acquisition which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Reworded paragraphs (60)
Previous wording
Commodity prices are subject to significant volatility. Drilling and production activity levels may vary across our geographic areas; however, a prolonged period of low commodity prices may reduce drilling and production activities across all areas. If we are not able to obtain new supplies to replace the natural decline in volumes from existing production or reductions in volumes because of competition, throughput on our gathering and transportation pipeline systems and the utilization rates of our processing and fractionation facilities would decline, which could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Commodity prices are subject to significant volatility. Drilling and production activity levels may vary across our geographic areas; however, a prolonged period of low commodity prices may reduce drilling and production activities across all areas. If we are not able to obtain new supplies to replace the natural decline in volumes from existing production or reductions in volumes because of competition, throughput on our gathering and transportation pipeline systems and the utilization rates of our processing and fractionation facilities would decline, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Our operating results may be affected adversely by unfavorable economic and market conditions.
Current wording
Our operating results may be adversely affected by unfavorable economic and market conditions.
Previous wording
Uncertainty or adverse changes in economic conditions worldwide, in the United States, or in the economic regions in which we operate, could negatively affect the crude oil and natural gas markets, resulting in reduced demand and increased price competition for our services and products, or otherwise affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Volatility in commodity prices may have an impact on many of our suppliers and customers, which, in turn, could have a negative impact on their ability to meet their obligations to us. Periods of severe volatility in equity and credit markets may disrupt our access to such markets, make it difficult to obtain financing necessary to expand facilities or acquire assets, increase financing costs and result in the imposition of restrictive financial covenants. Also, economic conditions following the COVID-19 pandemic included increased inflation. While inflation has declined since the second half of 2022, inflationary pressures have resulted in, and may continue to result in, additional increases to the cost of our materials, services and personnel, which could increase our capital expenditures and operating costs. Sustained levels of high inflation caused the Federal Reserve System and other central banks to increase interest rates, which may cause the cost of capital to increase and depress economic growth, either of which, or the combination of both, could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Uncertainty or adverse changes in economic conditions worldwide, in the United States, or in the economic regions in which we operate, could negatively affect the crude oil and natural gas markets, resulting in reduced demand and increased price competition for our services and products, or otherwise adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Volatility in commodity prices may have an impact on many of our suppliers and customers, which, in turn, could have a negative impact on their ability to meet their obligations to us. Periods of severe volatility in equity and credit markets may disrupt our access to such markets, make it difficult to obtain financing necessary to expand facilities or acquire assets, increase financing costs and result in the imposition of restrictive financial covenants. Inflationary pressures have resulted in, and may continue to result in, additional increases to the cost of our materials, services and personnel, which could increase our capital expenditures and operating costs. In addition, future tariffs, trade restrictions or retaliatory measures could further increase our input costs, lengthen delivery schedules or disrupt the availability of key components, particularly if we are unable to manage lead times for materials and equipment used in constructing capital projects or to enter into procurement agreements for long‑lead items to mitigate such risks. Sustained levels of high inflation could cause the Federal Reserve System and other central banks to increase interest rates, which could cause the cost of capital to increase and depress economic growth, either of which, or the combination of both, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
The volatility of natural gas, NGL, Refined Products and crude oil prices could affect adversely our earnings and cash flows.
Current wording
The volatility of natural gas, NGL, Refined Products and crude oil prices could adversely affect our earnings and cash flows.
Previous wording
•the occurrence of wars (such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine), the activities of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other non-OPEC oil producing countries with large production capacity, or other geopolitical conditions (including instability in the Middle East) impacting supply and demand for natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil;
Current wording
•the occurrence of wars (such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine), the activities of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and other non-OPEC oil producing countries with large production capacity, or other geopolitical conditions (including instability in the Middle East and Venezuela) impacting supply and demand for natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil;
Previous wording
•production decisions by other countries, and the failure of countries to abide by recent agreements relating to production decisions;
Current wording
•production decisions by other countries, and the failure of countries to abide by agreements relating to production decisions;
Previous wording
•public health crises, including pandemics (such as COVID-19);
Previous wording
•the effects of imports and exports on the price of natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products, crude oil and liquefied natural gas;
Current wording
•the effects of imports and exports on the price of natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products, crude oil and liquified natural gas;
Previous wording
These external factors and the volatile nature of the energy markets make it difficult to reliably estimate future prices of commodities and the impact commodity price fluctuations have on our customers and their need for our services, which could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
These external factors and the volatile nature of the energy markets make it difficult to reliably estimate future prices of commodities and the impact commodity price fluctuations have on our customers and their need for our services, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions, which could affect adversely our business and for which we may not be adequately insured.
Current wording
Our operations are subject to operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions, which could adversely affect our business and for which we may not be adequately insured.
Previous wording
Our operations are subject to all the risks and hazards typically associated with the operation of gathering, transportation and distribution pipelines, storage facilities and processing and fractionation facilities, which include, but are not limited to, leaks, pipeline ruptures, damage by third parties, the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes and the performance of facilities below expected levels of capacity and efficiency. Other operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions include adverse weather conditions (including extreme cold weather), public health crises including a pandemic (such as COVID-19), cybersecurity attacks, geopolitical events, accidents, explosions, fires, the collision of equipment with our pipeline facilities (for example, this may occur if a third party were to perform excavation or construction work near our facilities) and catastrophic events such as tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other similar events beyond our control. Similar operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions may also impact our producers or suppliers; for example, extreme cold weather can result in supply reductions from producer wellhead freeze-offs, as well as power curtailments or outages. A casualty occurrence may result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage or environmental damage. The occurrence of operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Our operations are subject to all the risks and hazards typically associated with the operation of gathering, transportation and distribution pipelines, storage facilities and processing and fractionation facilities, which include, but are not limited to, leaks, pipeline ruptures, damage by third parties, the breakdown or failure of equipment or processes and the performance of facilities below expected levels of capacity and efficiency. Other operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions include adverse weather conditions (including extreme cold weather), public health crises including a pandemic, cybersecurity attacks, geopolitical events, accidents, explosions, fires, the collision of equipment with our pipeline facilities (for example, this may occur if a third party were to perform excavation or construction work near our facilities) and catastrophic events such as tornados, hurricanes, earthquakes, floods and other similar events beyond our control. Similar operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions may also impact our producers or suppliers; for example, extreme cold weather can result in supply reductions from producer wellhead freeze-offs, as well as power curtailments or outages. A casualty occurrence may result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage or environmental damage. The occurrence of operational hazards and unforeseen interruptions could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially, and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Consequently, we may not be able to renew existing insurance policies or purchase other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Insurance proceeds may not be adequate to cover all liabilities or incurred costs and losses or lost earnings. Further, we are not fully insured against all risks inherent to our business. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Further, the proceeds of any such insurance may not be paid in a timely manner or reach the level of coverage purchased.
Current wording
Premiums and deductibles for certain insurance policies can increase substantially, and, in some instances, certain insurance may become unavailable or available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Consequently, we may not be able to renew existing insurance policies or purchase other desirable insurance on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. Insurance proceeds may not be adequate to cover all liabilities or incurred costs and losses or lost earnings. Further, we are not fully insured against all risks inherent to our business. If we were to incur a significant liability for which we were not fully insured, it could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Further, the proceeds of any such insurance policies may not be paid in a timely manner or reach the level of coverage purchased.
Previous wording
We do not hedge fully against commodity price risk or interest rate risk, including commodity price changes, seasonal price differentials, product price differentials or location price differentials. This could result in decreased revenues, increased costs and lower margins, affecting adversely our results of operations.
Current wording
We do not hedge fully against commodity price risk or interest rate risk, including commodity price changes, seasonal price differentials, product price differentials or location price differentials. This could result in decreased revenues, increased costs and lower margins, adversely affecting our results of operations.
Previous wording
•the price risk related to electric costs to operate our facilities; and
Current wording
•the price risk related to electricity costs to operate our facilities; and
Previous wording
To manage the risk from market price fluctuations in natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil and electricity prices, we may use derivative instruments such as swaps, futures, forwards and options. However, we do not hedge fully against commodity price changes, and we therefore retain some exposure to market risk. Further, hedging instruments that are used to reduce our exposure to interest-rate fluctuations could expose us to risk of financial loss where we may contract for fixed-rate swap instruments to hedge variable-rate instruments and the fixed rate exceeds the variable rate. Finally, hedging arrangements for forecasted sales and purchases are used to reduce our exposure to commodity price fluctuations and may limit the benefit we would otherwise receive if market prices for natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil differ from the stated price in the hedge instrument for these commodities.
Current wording
We do not hedge fully against commodity price changes, and we therefore retain some exposure to market risk. Further, hedging arrangements for forecasted sales and purchases are used to reduce our exposure to commodity price fluctuations and may limit the benefit we would otherwise receive if market prices for natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil differ from the stated price in the hedge instrument for these commodities. Finally, hedging instruments that are used to reduce our exposure to interest-rate fluctuations could expose us to risk of financial loss where we may contract for fixed-rate swap instruments to hedge variable-rate instruments and the fixed rate exceeds the variable rate.
Previous wording
A breach of information security, including a cybersecurity attack, or failure of one or more key information technology or operational systems, or those of third parties, may affect adversely our operations, financial results or reputation.
Current wording
A breach of information security, including a cybersecurity attack, or failure of one or more key information technology or operational systems, or those of third parties, may adversely affect our operations, financial results or reputation.
Previous wording
If any of our systems is damaged, fails to function properly or otherwise becomes unavailable, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them and may experience loss or corruption of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to perform critical functions, which could affect adversely our business and results of operations. Our financial results could also be affected adversely if our operational systems fail as a result of an inadvertent error or by deliberate tampering with or manipulation of our operational systems. In addition, dependence upon automated systems may further increase the risk that operational system flaws or employee or third-party tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect.
Current wording
If any of our systems is damaged, fails to function properly or otherwise becomes unavailable, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them and may experience loss or corruption of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to perform critical functions, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our financial results could also be adversely affected if our operational systems fail as a result of an inadvertent error or by deliberate tampering with or manipulation of our operational systems. In addition, dependence upon automated systems may further increase the risk that operational system flaws or employee or third-party tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect.
Previous wording
Terrorist attacks, including cyber sabotage, aimed at our facilities could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Terrorist attacks, including cyber sabotage, aimed at our facilities could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
The United States government has issued warnings that energy assets, including our nation’s pipeline infrastructure, may be the future target of terrorist organizations or “cyber sabotage” events. For example, in May 2021, a ransomware attack on a major U.S. Refined Products pipeline forced the operator to temporarily shut down the pipeline, resulting in disruption of fuel supplies along the East Coast. Potential targets include our facilities, pipelines, databases or operating systems. A terrorist attack could create significant price volatility, disrupt our business, limit our access to capital markets or cause significant harm to our operations, including full or partial disruption to our ability to provide service to our customers. Acts of terrorism, as well as events occurring in response to or in connection with acts of terrorism, could also cause environmental repercussions that could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant reconstruction or remediation costs. The potential for an attack may subject our operations to increased risks and costs, and any such terrorist attack or cyber sabotage on our facilities, pipelines, databases of operating systems, those of our customers, or in some cases, those of other pipelines could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
The United States government has issued warnings that energy assets, including our nation’s pipeline infrastructure, may be the future target of terrorist organizations or “cyber sabotage” events. Potential targets include our facilities, pipelines, databases or operating systems. A terrorist attack could create significant price volatility, disrupt our business, limit our access to capital markets or cause significant harm to our operations, including full or partial disruption to our ability to provide service to our customers. Acts of terrorism, as well as events occurring in response to or in connection with acts of terrorism, could also cause environmental repercussions that could result in a significant decrease in revenues or significant reconstruction or remediation costs. The potential for an attack may subject our operations to increased risks and costs, and any such terrorist attack or cyber sabotage on our facilities, pipelines, databases of operating systems, those of our customers, or in some cases, those of other pipelines could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Increasing attention to ESG issues, including climate change, may impact our business.
Current wording
Scrutiny and conflicting stakeholder expectations regarding ESG issues, including climate change, may impact our business.
Previous wording
There are expectations that companies across all industries address ESG issues, including climate change. Changes in regulatory policies, public sentiment or widespread adoption of technologies that aim to address climate change through reducing GHG emissions may result in a reduction in the demand for hydrocarbon products, restrictions on their use or increased use of alternative energy sources. These changes could reduce the demand for our services, impacting our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Companies are subject to scrutiny from customers, investors, rating agencies, policymakers and other stakeholders regarding their management of ESG issues, including human capital and climate change. Changes in regulatory policies, public sentiment or widespread adoption of technologies that aim to address climate change through reducing GHG emissions may result in a reduction in the demand for hydrocarbon products, restrictions on their use or increased use of alternative energy sources. These changes could reduce the demand for our services, impacting our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Certain capital providers could restrict or impose additional scrutiny on lending and investment in the energy sector, which could adversely impact the availability or cost of capital.
Previous wording
The threat of global climate change may create physical and financial risks to our business. Some of our customers’ energy needs vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature. To the extent weather conditions may be affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in more pipelines and other infrastructure to serve increased demand. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect our financial condition through decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including damage to our assets or service interruptions. Weather conditions outside of our operating territory could also have an impact on our revenues. Severe weather impacts our operating territories primarily through hurricanes, thunderstorms, tornados, floods, freezing temperatures and snow or ice storms. To the extent the severity or frequency of extreme weather events increases, this could increase our cost of providing services, including the cost of insurance, and the availability of certain insurance coverages could decrease. We may not be able to pass on the higher costs to our customers or recover all costs related to mitigating these physical risks.
Current wording
The threat of global climate change may create physical and financial risks to our business. Some of our customers’ energy needs vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature. To the extent weather conditions may be affected by climate change, customers’ energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increased energy use due to weather changes may require us to invest in more pipelines and other infrastructure to serve increased demand. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect our financial condition through decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including damage to our assets or service interruptions. Weather conditions outside of our operating territory could also have an impact on our revenues. Severe weather impacts our operating territories primarily through hurricanes, thunderstorms, tornados, floods, freezing temperatures and snow or ice storms. To the extent the severity or frequency of extreme weather events increases, this could increase our cost of providing services, including the cost of insurance, and the availability of certain insurance coverages could decrease. We may not be able to pass on the higher costs to our customers or recover all costs related to mitigating these physical risks. We are also subject to various transition risks associated with climate change; for more information, see our risk factor titled “Scrutiny and conflicting stakeholder expectations regarding ESG issues, including climate change, may impact our business.”
Previous wording
•inflationary pressure, along with pressure that may arise from the imposition by the federal government of tariffs on non-U.S. produced construction materials, could increase our costs for construction materials or labor.
Current wording
•inflationary pressure, along with pressure that may arise from the imposition by the federal government of tariffs on non-U.S. produced construction materials, could increase our costs for construction materials, equipment or labor.
Previous wording
As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil to achieve our expected investment return, which could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
As a result, new facilities may not be able to attract enough natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil to achieve our expected investment return, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
We may not be able to accurately estimate hydrocarbon reserves and production volumes expected to be delivered to us for a variety of reasons, including the unavailability of sufficiently detailed information and unanticipated changes in producers’ expected drilling schedules. Accordingly, we may not have accurate estimates of total reserves committed to our assets, the anticipated life of such reserves or the expected volumes to be produced from those reserves. In such event, if we are unable to secure additional sources, then the volumes that we gather, process, fractionate and transport in the future could be less than anticipated. A decline in such volumes could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
We may not be able to accurately estimate hydrocarbon reserves and production volumes expected to be delivered to us for a variety of reasons, including the unavailability of sufficiently detailed information and unanticipated changes in producers’ expected drilling schedules. Accordingly, we may not have accurate estimates of total reserves committed to our assets, the anticipated life of such reserves or the expected volumes to be produced from those reserves. In such event, if we are unable to secure additional sources, then the volumes that we gather, process, fractionate and transport in the future could be less than anticipated. A decline in such volumes could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
We do not own all of the land on which certain of our pipelines and facilities are located, and we are, therefore, subject to the risk of increased costs to maintain necessary land use. We obtain the rights to construct and operate certain of our pipelines and related facilities on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of time. Our loss of these rights, through our inability to renew right-of-way contracts on acceptable terms or increased costs to renew such rights, could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
We do not own all of the land on which certain of our pipelines and facilities are located, and we are, therefore, subject to the risk of increased costs to maintain necessary land use. We obtain the rights to construct and operate certain of our pipelines and related facilities on land owned by third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of time. Our loss of these rights, through our inability to renew right-of-way contracts on acceptable terms or increased costs to renew such rights, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Product measurement adjustments occur as part of the normal operating conditions associated with our assets. The quantification and resolution of measurement adjustments are complicated by several factors including: (i) the significant quantities (i.e., thousands) of measurement equipment that we use across our systems, (ii) varying qualities of natural gas in the streams gathered and processed through our systems and the mixed nature of NGLs gathered and fractionated; and (iii) variances in measurement that are inherent in metering technologies and standards. Each of these factors may contribute to measurement adjustments that may occur on our systems, which could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Product measurement adjustments occur as part of the normal operating conditions associated with our assets. The quantification and resolution of measurement adjustments are complicated by several factors including: (i) the significant quantities (i.e., thousands) of measurement equipment that we use across our systems, (ii) varying qualities of natural gas in the streams gathered and processed through our systems and the mixed nature of NGLs gathered and fractionated; and (iii) variances in measurement that are inherent in metering technologies and standards. Each of these factors may contribute to measurement adjustments that may occur on our systems, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Our pipeline, processing, fractionation, terminal and storage assets compete with other similar assets for natural gas, NGL, Refined Products and crude oil supply delivered to the markets we serve. As a result of competition, we may have significant levels of uncontracted or discounted capacity on our assets, which could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Our pipeline, processing, fractionation, terminal and storage assets compete with other similar assets for natural gas, NGLs, Refined Products and crude oil supply delivered to the markets we serve. As a result of competition, we may have significant levels of uncontracted or discounted capacity on our assets, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
Many of our assets are designed as long-lived assets. Over time the age of these assets could result in increased maintenance or remediation expenditures and an increased risk of product releases and associated costs and liabilities. Any significant increase in these expenditures, costs or liabilities could affect adversely our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Current wording
Many of our assets are designed as long-lived assets. Over time the age of these assets could result in increased maintenance or remediation expenditures and an increased risk of product releases and associated costs and liabilities. Any significant increase in these expenditures, costs or liabilities could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Previous wording
We participate in several joint ventures. Due to the nature of some of these arrangements, each participant in these joint ventures has made substantial investments in the joint venture and, accordingly, has required that the relevant charter documents contain certain features designed to provide each participant with the opportunity to participate in the management of the joint venture and to protect its investment, as well as any other assets that may be substantially dependent on or otherwise affected by the activities of that joint venture. These participation and protective features customarily include a corporate governance structure that requires at least a majority-in-interest vote to authorize many basic activities and requires a greater voting interest (sometimes up to 100%) to authorize more significant activities. Examples of these more significant activities are large expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction or acquisition of assets, borrowing money or otherwise raising capital, transactions with affiliates of a joint-venture participant, litigation and transactions not in the ordinary course of business, among others. Thus, without the concurrence of joint-venture participants with enough voting interests, we may be unable to cause any of our joint ventures to take or not to take certain actions, even though those actions may be in the best interest of us or the particular joint venture.
Current wording
We participate in several joint ventures. Due to the nature of some of these arrangements, each participant in these joint ventures has made substantial investments in the joint venture and, accordingly, has required that the relevant charter documents contain certain features designed to provide each participant with the opportunity to participate in the management of the joint venture and to protect its investment, as well as any other assets that may be substantially dependent on or otherwise affected by the activities of that joint venture. These participation and protective features customarily include a corporate governance structure that requires at least a majority-in-interest vote to authorize many basic activities and requires a greater voting interest (sometimes up to 100%) to authorize more significant activities. Examples of activities requiring joint-venture participant approval are large expenditures or contractual commitments, the construction or acquisition of assets, borrowing cash or otherwise raising capital, transactions with affiliates of a joint-venture participant, litigation and transactions not in the ordinary course of business, among others. Thus, without the concurrence of joint-venture participants with enough voting interests, we may be unable to cause any of our joint ventures to take or not to take certain actions, even though those actions may be in the best interest of us or the particular joint venture.
Previous wording
We do not operate all of our joint-venture assets nor do we employ directly all of the persons responsible for providing administrative, operating and management services. This reliance on others to operate joint-venture assets and to provide other services could affect adversely our business and results of operations.
Current wording
We do not operate all of our joint-venture assets nor do we employ directly all of the persons responsible for providing administrative, operating and management services. This reliance on others to operate joint-venture assets and to provide other services could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Previous wording
We rely on others to provide administrative, operating and management services for certain of our joint-venture assets. We have a limited ability to control the operations and the associated costs of such operations. The success of these operations depends on a number of factors that are outside our control, including the competence and financial resources of the operator or an outsourced service provider. We may have to contract elsewhere for outsourced services, which may cost more than we are currently paying. In addition, we may not be able to obtain the same level or kind of service or retain or receive the services in a timely manner, which may impact our ability to perform under our contracts and affect adversely our business and results of operations.
Current wording
We rely on others to provide administrative, operating and management services for certain of our joint-venture assets. We have a limited ability to control the operations and the associated costs of such operations. The success of these operations depends on a number of factors that are outside our control, including the competence and financial resources of the operator or an outsourced service provider. We may have to contract elsewhere for outsourced services, which may cost more than we are currently paying. In addition, we may not be able to obtain the same level or kind of service or retain or receive the services in a timely manner, which may impact our ability to perform under our contracts and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Previous wording
Under Section 382 of the Code and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an ownership change, which is generally defined as a greater than 50 percent change in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the company’s ability to utilize U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited. We believe our historical U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes are not currently subject to a limitation as a result of an ownership change. However, it is possible that an ownership change may occur in the future, which may materially impact our ability to use our U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes to reduce U.S. federal and state taxable income. Such limitation could affect adversely our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The historical EnLink NOL carryforward acquired upon the completion of the EnLink Acquisition is expected to be subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Code.
Current wording
Under Section 382 of the Code and corresponding provisions of state law, if a corporation undergoes an ownership change, which is generally defined as a greater than 50 percent change in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the company’s ability to utilize U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes may be limited. We believe our historical U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes are not currently subject to a limitation as a result of an ownership change. However, it is possible that an ownership change may occur in the future, which may materially impact our ability to use our U.S. NOL carryforwards and other tax attributes to reduce U.S. federal and state taxable income. Such limitation could adversely affect our results of operations, financial position and cash flows. The historical EnLink NOL carryforward acquired upon the completion of the EnLink Acquisition is subject to limitations under Section 382 of the Code, however, the limitation is not material and will not have an impact on our overall ability to utilize tax attributes to reduce our future U.S. federal and state income tax obligations.
Previous wording
The FERC’s ratemaking methodologies may limit our ability to increase rates by amounts sufficient to reflect our actual cost or may delay the use of rates that reflect increased costs. The FERC’s indexing methodology is based on changes in the producer price index for finished goods combined with an index adjustment. The methodology is subject to review every five years and currently allows a pipeline to change its rates each year to a new ceiling level. When the change in the ceiling level is negative, we are generally required to reduce our rates that are subject to the FERC’s indexing methodology. The results of FERC’s last five-year review were subject to appeal at the D.C. Circuit, which vacated FERC’s orders and remanded to FERC. FERC subsequently issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking proposing to reduce the index price back down to the rehearing order price and the proposal is now pending at FERC.
Current wording
The FERC’s ratemaking methodologies may limit our ability to increase rates by amounts sufficient to reflect our actual cost or may delay the use of rates that reflect increased costs. The FERC’s indexing methodology is based on changes in the producer price index for finished goods combined with an index adjustment. The methodology is subject to review every five years and currently allows a pipeline to change its rates each year to a new ceiling level. When the change in the ceiling level is negative, we are generally required to reduce our rates that are subject to the FERC’s indexing methodology.
Previous wording
The crude oil and natural gas industries rely on supplies from nonconventional sources, such as shale and tight sands. Crude oil and natural gas extracted from these sources frequently requires hydraulic fracturing, which involves the pressurized injection of water, sand and chemicals into a geologic formation to stimulate crude oil and natural gas production. Legislation or regulations placing restrictions on exploration and production activities, including hydraulic fracturing and disposal of wastewater, could result in operational delays, increased operating costs and additional regulatory burdens on exploration and production operators. Any of these factors could reduce their production of crude oil and unprocessed natural gas and, in turn, affect adversely our revenues and results of operations by decreasing the volumes of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs gathered, treated, processed, fractionated, stored and transported on our or our joint ventures’ assets.
Current wording
The crude oil and natural gas industries rely on supplies from nonconventional sources, such as shale and tight sands. Crude oil and natural gas extracted from these sources frequently requires hydraulic fracturing, which involves the pressurized injection of water, sand and chemicals into a geologic formation to stimulate crude oil and natural gas production. Legislation or regulations placing restrictions on exploration and production activities, including hydraulic fracturing and disposal of wastewater, or curtailment of water use for industrial or mineral development activities, could result in operational delays, increased operating costs and additional regulatory burdens on exploration and production operators. Any of these factors could reduce their production of crude oil and unprocessed natural gas and, in turn, adversely affect our revenues and results of operations by decreasing the volumes of crude oil, natural gas and NGLs gathered, treated, processed, fractionated, stored and transported on our or our joint ventures’ assets.
Previous wording
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 expanded the required use of renewable fuels in the U.S. Each year, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes a Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) requirement for refiners and fuel manufacturers based on overall quotas established by the federal government. By virtue of our liquids blending activity and resulting gasoline production, we are an obligated party and receive an annual RVO from the EPA. We typically purchase renewable energy credits, called RINs, to meet this obligation. Increases in the cost or decreases in the availability of RINs could have an adverse impact on our business.
Current wording
The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 expanded the required use of renewable fuels in the U.S. Each year, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) establishes a Renewable Volume Obligation (RVO) requirement for refiners and fuel manufacturers based on overall quotas established by the federal government. By virtue of our liquids blending activity and resulting gasoline production, we are an obligated party and receive an annual RVO from the EPA. We typically purchase renewable identification numbers, called RINs, under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program to meet this obligation. Increases in the cost or decreases in the availability of RINs, as well as any volatility in such costs or availability, could have an adverse impact on our business.
Previous wording
GHG emissions in the midstream industry originate primarily from combustion engine exhaust, heater exhaust and fugitive methane gas emissions. International, federal, regional and/or state legislative and/or regulatory initiatives may attempt to control or limit GHG emissions, including initiatives directed at issues associated with climate change. Various federal and state legislative proposals have been introduced to regulate the emission of GHGs, particularly carbon dioxide and methane, and the United States Supreme Court has ruled that carbon dioxide is a pollutant subject to regulation by the EPA. In addition, there have been international efforts seeking legally binding reductions in emissions of GHGs.
Current wording
GHG emissions in the midstream industry originate primarily from combustion engine and heater exhaust and fugitive methane gas emissions. International, federal, regional and/or state legislative and/or regulatory initiatives may attempt to control or limit GHG emissions, including initiatives directed at issues associated with climate change. Various federal and state legislative proposals have been introduced to regulate the emission of GHGs, particularly carbon dioxide and methane. In addition, there have been international efforts seeking legally binding reductions in emissions of GHGs.
Previous wording
We believe it is likely that future governmental legislation and/or regulation on the federal, state and regional levels, may further require us to limit GHG emissions associated with our operations, pay additional fees associated with our GHG emissions or purchase allowances for such emissions. For example, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) directs the EPA to impose and collect payment of “Waste Emissions Charges,” or “Methane Fees,” for specific facilities that report more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of GHG emissions per year and have methane emissions intensity in excess of the relevant statutory threshold. Based on text in the IRA and a related rule that the EPA finalized in November 2024 to implement the Methane Fee program, we expect to begin paying Methane Fees in 2025 (for 2024 reported emissions) for applicable facilities. In January 2025, industry associations and certain states challenged the Waste Emissions Charge rule in the D.C. Circuit, and the new administration issued an executive order directing the heads of all federal agencies to identify and begin the processes to suspend, revise or rescind all agency actions that are unduly burdensome on the identification, development or use of domestic energy resources. Consequently, future implementation and enforcement of these rules remain uncertain at this time. Methane Fees, if implemented, and other legislative and/or regulatory initiatives could make some of our activities uneconomic to maintain or operate. However, we cannot predict precisely what form these future legislative and/or regulatory initiatives will take, the stringency of such initiatives, when they will become effective or the impact on our capital expenditures, competitive position and results of operations. Further, we may not be able to pass on the higher costs to our customers or recover all costs related to complying with GHG legislative and/or regulatory requirements. Our future results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be affected adversely if such costs are not recovered or otherwise passed on to our customers.
Current wording
We believe it is likely that future governmental legislation and/or regulation on the federal, state and regional levels, may further require us to limit GHG emissions associated with our operations, pay additional fees associated with our GHG emissions or purchase allowances for such emissions. In the past, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA) had directed the EPA to impose and collect payment of “Waste Emissions Charges,” or “Methane Fees,” for specific facilities that report more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent of GHG emissions per year and have a methane emissions intensity in excess of the relevant statutory threshold. However, the new administration issued an executive order directing the heads of all federal agencies to identify and begin the processes to suspend, revise or rescind all agency actions that are unduly burdensome on the identification, development or use of domestic energy resources. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed July 4, 2025, suspended the Methane Fee. Additionally, on February 12, 2026, the EPA issued a final rule eliminating the 2009 GHG endangerment finding, which underpins U.S. federal regulation of GHG emissions under the Clean Air Act. The final rule is expected to be subject to extensive litigation. Consequently, future implementation and enforcement of these rules remain uncertain at this time. Methane Fees, if implemented, and other legislative and/or regulatory initiatives that increase our costs or the complexity or compliance burden of business could make some of our activities uneconomic to maintain or operate. However, we cannot predict precisely what form these future legislative and/or regulatory initiatives will take, the stringency of such initiatives, when they will become effective or the impact on our capital expenditures, competitive position and results of operations. Further, we may not be able to pass on the higher costs to our customers or recover all costs related to complying with GHG legislative and/or regulatory requirements. Our future results of operations, financial position or cash flows could be adversely affected if such costs are not recovered or otherwise passed on to our customers.
Previous wording
Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health and safety and the environment, which may expose us to significant costs and liabilities. Increased litigation and activism challenging continued reliance upon oil and gas as well as changes to and/or increased penalties from the enforcement of laws, regulations and policies could impact adversely our business.
Current wording
Our operations are subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of public health and safety and the environment, which may expose us to significant costs and liabilities. Increased litigation and activism challenging continued reliance upon oil and gas as well as changes to and/or increased penalties from the enforcement of laws, regulations and policies could adversely impact our business.
Previous wording
•Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), and analogous state laws that regulate the cleanup of hazardous substances that may have been released at properties currently or previously owned or operated by us or locations to which we have sent waste for disposal;
Current wording
•Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, as amended (CERCLA), the Oil Pollution Act (OPA) and analogous state laws that regulate the cleanup of hazardous substances that may have been released at properties currently or previously owned or operated by us or locations to which we have sent waste for disposal;
Showing the first 40 of 60 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Although ONEOK Partners, the Intermediate Partnership, Magellan, EnLink and EnLink Partners have guaranteed our debt securities, the guarantees are subject to release under certain circumstances, and we have subsidiaries that are not guarantors.