MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST INC

6. Stock Awards

During the second quarter of 2022, we amended the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Incentive Plan”), which authorizes the issuance of common stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, deferred stock units, stock appreciation rights, performance units, and awards of interests in our Operating Partnership. Our Equity Incentive Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, and we have reserved 28.9 million shares of common stock for awards, of which 9.0 million shares remain available for future stock awards as of June 30, 2025. Share-based compensation expense totaled $18.5 million and $16.2 million for thesix months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. Of this expense, $4.4 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, are from the 2024 and 2025 performance award grants that contain cash-settlement features and are marked to fair value quarterly. None of the 2024 or 2025 performance awards have been earned or vested at June 30, 2025, and will not begin to earn/vest until, for 20 consecutive days, our stock price reaches $7.00 for the 2024 performance award and our total shareholder return reaches 20% (based on the April 15, 2025 grant date) for our 2025 performance award.

7. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We have various assets and liabilities that are considered financial instruments. We estimate that the carrying value of cash and cash equivalents and accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate their fair values. We estimate the fair value of our interest and rent receivables using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates at which similar receivables would be made to others with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. The fair value of our mortgage loans and other loans are estimated by using Level 2 inputs such as discounting the estimated future cash flows using the current rates which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities. We determine the fair value of our senior notes using Level 2 inputs such as quotes from securities dealers and market makers. We estimate the fair value of our revolving credit facility and term loans using Level 2 inputs based on the present value of future payments, discounted at a rate which we consider appropriate for such debt.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, are subjective in nature, and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Settlement of such fair value amounts may not be a prudent management decision.

The following table summarizes fair value estimates for our financial instruments (in thousands):

(1)

Excludes the convertible loan portion of our investment in PHP Holdings made in May 2023 and the acquisition loan made in May 2020 related to our investment in the international joint venture, along with the related subsequent investment in the real estate ofthree hospitals in Colombia, as these assets are accounted for under the fair value option method, as noted below.

(2)

Includes $14.0 million and $7.9 million of mortgage loans, $390.3 million and $315.5 million of loans (including a shareholder loan) included in investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, $45.4 million and $39.7 million of loans that are part of our investments in unconsolidated operating entities, and $142.7 million and $104.0 million of other loans at June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Our equity investment and related loan to the international joint venture, our loan investment in the real estate ofthree hospitals operated by subsidiaries of the international joint venture in Colombia, and our investment in PHP Holdings are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as we elected to account for these investments using the fair value option at the point of initial investment. We elected to account for these investments at fair value due to the size of the investments and because we believed this method was more reflective of current values.

At June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024, the amounts recorded under the fair value option method were as follows (in thousands):

Ourloans to the international joint venture and its subsidiaries are recorded at fair value by discounting the estimated future contractual cash flows using a credit-adjusted rate of return, which is derived from market rates of return on similar loans with similar credit quality and remaining maturity. Our equity investment in the international joint venture and our investment in PHP Holdings (as of December 31, 2024 only) are recorded at fair value by using a market approach (for our equity investment in the international joint venture) and a market approach based on the agreed upon price in the transaction (for our investment in PHP Holdings), which requires significant estimates of our investee, such as projected revenue, expenses, and working capital, and appropriate consideration of the underlying risk profile of the forecasted assumptions associated with the investee. We classify our valuations of these investments as Level 3, as we use certain unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the fair value measurement, and the valuations require management judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices. For the market approach model used for our investment in PHP Holdings (as of December 31, 2024 only), our unobservable inputs included purchase price adjustments related to expected balance sheet values at the time of the transaction close, and an adjustment for a marketability discount ("DLOM") of 14.2%. In regard to the underlying projections used in the discounted cash flow model, such projections are provided by the investees. However, we may modify such projections as needed based on our review and analysis of historical results, meetings with key members of management, and our understanding of trends and developments within the healthcare industry.

The sale of our investment in PHP Holdings closed on July 1, 2025, and we received cash proceeds of $2.3 million as previously discussed in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. As such, we recorded an unfavorable fair value adjustment down to a value of $2.3 million at June 30, 2025.

In the first six months of 2025, we recorded a net unfavorable adjustment to the investments accounted for under the fair value option method of approximately $164 million, primarily related to our investment inthree hospitals in Colombia and our investment in PHP Holdings as further discussed in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. In the first half of 2024, we recorded a net unfavorable adjustment to the investments accounted for under the fair value option method of approximately $585 million, primarily related to the loan to the international joint venture of $225 million (see further discussion below under "Impairment and Fair Value Adjustments of Non-Real Estate Investments") and our investment in PHP Holdings of $360 million.

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

In addition to items that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, we have assets and liabilities that are measured, from time-to-time, at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, such as for impairment purposes of our real estate, financial instruments, and for certain equity investments without a readily determinable fair value.

Impairment and Fair Value Adjustments of Non-Real Estate Investments

Prior to the global settlement in September 2024 (as described in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) in which our claims were released, our non-real estate investments in Steward and related affiliates included our 9.9% equity investment, working capital and other secured loans, and a loan made to a Steward affiliate in 2021, proceeds of which were used to redeem a similarly sized convertible loan held by Steward’s former private equity sponsor. In addition, the loan to the international joint venture was collateralized by the equity of Steward held by an investor in both Steward and the international joint venture. To assess recovery of these investments in the 2024 first quarter, we performed a valuation of Steward’s business at March 31, 2024, with assistance from a third-party, independent valuation firm. The valuation utilized the cost, market, and income approaches. The fair value analysis was performed under a non-going concern, orderly liquidation premise of value and assumed normal exposure to market participants at that time. We utilized this premise of value due to Steward’s financial distress and subsequent filing of bankruptcy. The valuation approaches used Level 3 inputs, and such approaches were based on the financial performance of the Steward assets. For profitable hospitals, Level 3 inputs included a weighted average EBITDA multiple of 6.48x from a selected range of 5x to 7x in reference to comparable transactions. We also used a weighted average discount rate of 15.03% from a selected range of 15% to 16%. For unprofitable hospitals, Level 3 inputs included a weighted average net revenue multiple of 0.275x from a selected range of 0.25x to 0.30x in reference to comparable transactions. We also considered the reported book values inclusive of various adjustments for unprofitable hospitals. After reducing the derived fair value of Steward's business for Steward's secured debt and their working capital deficit, we arrived at only a nominal remaining value that could not support the carrying value of the loan to a Steward affiliate from 2021 or our remaining 9.9% equity investment. In addition, the value of the investor's share of the remaining 90.1% of Steward's equity that collateralized the loan to the international joint venture was deemed insufficient to support recovery of this investment. As a result, we recorded impairment charges and negative fair value adjustments in the 2024 first quarter, as discussed further in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of Real Estate Investments

See the Prospect subheading under "Leasing Operations (Lessor)" in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for a discussion around the use of fair value and related assumptions in the impairment of our real estate investments.

In the 2024 second quarter, we recognized approximately $500 millionof real estate impairment charges, primarily involving the eight Massachusetts properties in the Macquarie partnership. In our assessment, we first made a comparison of the carrying value of our real estate to projected undiscounted cash flows. For those properties in which the carrying value was not deemed recoverable, we recorded an impairment charge to the extent our carrying value was greater than its estimated fair value. In estimating fair value forthese properties, we, along with assistance from a third-party, independent valuation firm, used a combination of cost, market, and income approaches using Level 3 inputs. The cost approach used comparable sales to value the land and cost manuals to value the improvements. The value derived from the market approach was based on sale prices of similar properties. For the income approach, we divided the expected operating income (i.e. revenue less expenses, if any) from the property by a market capitalization rate (range from 7% to 10%). Our share of the real estate impairment charge in the Macquarie partnership exceeded the remaining equity amount in the joint venture, which resulted in a write down of our equity interest tozero and such charge is reflected in the "Earnings (loss) from equity interests" line on the condensed consolidated statements of net income.

8. Earnings Per Share/Unit

Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

Our earnings per share were calculated based on the following (in thousands):

MPT Operating Partnership, L.P.

Our earnings per unit were calculated based on the following (in thousands):

(1)

The above computation of diluted earnings per share/unit does not include 103,820 and 85,032 potential common shares/units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, respectively, and 17,299 and 8,649 shares/units for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, respectively, as inclusion of these shares when a loss exists would be antidilutive.

9. Contingencies

As part of the global settlement with Steward discussed in Note 3, upon completion of the transfers to the new operators and satisfaction of certain other conditions, in addition to approval by relevant state and local regulators, we and Steward agreed, subject to specified exceptions, to the mutual release of claims against each other. In connection with the global settlement and reciprocal release of claims, we have established an approximate $19 million reserve at June 30, 2025, for property taxes, other property related expenses, and other obligations due to third parties associated with properties formerly leased to Steward.

We are party to various lawsuits as described below:

Securities and Derivative Litigation

On April 13, 2023, we and certain of our executives were named as defendants in a putative federal securities class action lawsuit alleging false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions resulted in artificially inflated prices for our common stock, filed by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (Case No. 2:23-cv-00486). The complaint seeks class certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between July 15, 2019 and February 22, 2023 and unspecified damages including interest and an award of reasonable costs and expenses. This class action complaint was amended on September 22, 2023 and alleges that we made material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our tenants. On September 26, 2024, the Court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice, and the plaintiff thereafter moved the Court to alter its judgment. That motion has been fully briefed and is currently pending before the Court.

Members of our Board of Directors were also named as defendants in two related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by purported stockholders in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on October 19, 2023 (Case No. 2:23- cv-01415) and December 7, 2023 (Case No. 2:23-cv-01667). The Company was named as a nominal defendant in both complaints. These shareholder derivative complaints both make allegations similar to those made in the Alabama securities lawsuit described above relating to purported material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our tenants. These derivative actions have been consolidated and stayed pending further developments in the Alabama securities lawsuit. Members of our Board of Directors were also named as defendants in three related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by purported stockholders in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland on February 16, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-00471), June 28, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-01899), and July 26, 2024 (Case No. 1 24-cv-02173). The Company was named as a nominal defendant. These shareholder derivative complaints make allegations similar to those made in the Alabama securities and derivative lawsuits described above relating to purported material misstatements or omissions relating to the financial health of certain of our tenants. Defendants have not been required to respond to these complaints pending further developments in the Alabama securities lawsuit.

On September 29, 2023, we and certain of our executives were named as defendants in a putative federal securities class action lawsuit filed by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Case No. 1:23-cv- 08597). The complaint seeks class certification on behalf of purchasers of our common stock between May 23, 2023 and August 17, 2023 and alleges false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. This class action complaint was amended on October 30, 2024 and alleges that we made material misstatements or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on January 14, 2025. That motion has been fully briefed and is currently pending before the Court.

Members of our Board of Directors were also named as defendants in two related shareholder derivative lawsuits filed by purported stockholders in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 18, 2023 (Case No. 1:23-cv- 10934) and March 1, 2024 (Case No. 1:24-cv-01589). The Company was named as a nominal defendant in both complaints. These shareholder derivative complaints both make allegations similar to those made in the New York securities lawsuit described above relating to purported false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. The two cases have been consolidated and stayed pending further developments in the New York securities lawsuit described above. On February 21, 2024, members of our Board of Directors were named as defendants in a shareholder derivative lawsuit filed by a purported stockholder in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Case No. 1:24-cv-00527). The Company was named as a nominal defendant. This shareholder derivative complaint makes allegations similar to those made in the New York securities and derivative lawsuits described above relating to purported false and/or misleading statements and/or omissions in connection with certain transactions involving Prospect. This action has been stayed pending further developments in the New York securities action described above.

We believe these claims are without merit and intend to defend the remaining open cases vigorously. We have not recorded a liability related to the lawsuits above because, at this time, we are unable to determine whether an unfavorable outcome is probable or to estimate reasonably possible losses.

From time-to-time, we are a party to other legal proceedings, claims, or regulatory inquiries and investigations arising out of, or incidental to, our business. While we are unable to predict with certainty the outcome of any particular matter, in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to those proceedings is not presently expected to materially affect our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

10. Segment Disclosures

We manage our business and report financial results asone business segment. This is consistent with the manner in which our chief operating decision maker ("CODM"), our executive team made up of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business.

Our primary business strategy and source of revenue is from the acquisition and development of healthcare facilities that are leased to healthcare operating companies under long-term net leases, which require the tenant to bear most of the costs associated with the property. The majority of our leased assets are owned 100%; however, we do own some leased assets through joint ventures with other partners. We also may make mortgage loans to healthcare operators collateralized by their real estate. In addition, we may make noncontrolling investments in our tenants, from time-to-time, typically in conjunction with larger real estate transactions with the tenant, which may enhance our overall return and provide for certain minority rights and protections. Although we generate our revenues from these investments in the U.S. and eight other countries across multiple property types, we centrally manage these business activities on a consolidated basis. The accounting policies of our business segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The CODM evaluates performance and makes resource and operating decisions for the business on a consolidated basis using consolidated net income from our consolidated statements of net income as our primary GAAP profit measure supplemented by consolidated funds from operations ("FFO"). We use net income and FFO to monitor expected versus actual results to assess performance. The measure of segment assets is total assets as reported on our consolidated balance sheets. We compute FFO in accordance with the definition provided by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, which represents consolidated net (loss) income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate and impairment charges on real estate assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization, including amortization related to in-place lease intangibles, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

Given FFO excludes real estate related depreciation and amortization expense by definition and due to our typical net lease structure which requires our tenants to bear most of the costs associated with our properties (including property taxes, insurance, etc.), the primary expenses reviewed by the CODM include general and administrative and interest expenses from our consolidated statements of net income. See "Concentration of Credit Risks" in Note 3 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for entity-wide disclosures around major customers, geographic areas, and property types.