CYTOKINETICS INC
For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 7, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 7, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-06.
0000950170-25-064529
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-06-30; filed 2025-08-07.
0000950170-25-105108
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 116 previous paragraphs and 116 current paragraphs.
110 unchanged; 6 reworded; 0 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Reworded paragraphs (6)
Previous wording
Drug candidates that have similar mechanisms of actions to our have been subject to clinical trials that have failed to meet their primary endpoints. For example, Camzyos® (mavacamten), a small molecule myosin inhibitor commercialized by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has a similar mechanism of action to aficamten and failed to meet its dual primary endpoints in ODYSSEY-HCM, a phase 3 clinical trial assessing its efficacy for the treatment of nHCM. Although such result is not dispositive on the eventual results our clinical trial of aficamten in nHCM, ACACIA-HCM, the results of ODYSSEY-HCM may suggest that a myosin inhibitor is not effective for the treatment of nHCM notwithstanding the positive results in clinical trials of such drugs in oHCM.
Current wording
Drug candidates that have similar mechanisms of actions to our have been subject to clinical trials that have failed to meet their primary endpoints. For example, Camzyos® (mavacamten), a small molecule myosin inhibitor commercialized by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has a similar mechanism of action to aficamten and failed to meet its dual primary endpoints in ODYSSEY-HCM, a Phase 3 clinical trial assessing its efficacy for the treatment of nHCM. Although such result is not dispositive on the eventual results of our clinical trial of aficamten in nHCM, ACACIA-HCM, the results of ODYSSEY-HCM may suggest that a myosin inhibitor is not effective for the treatment of nHCM notwithstanding the positive results in clinical trials of such drugs in oHCM.
Previous wording
In connection with the anticipation of filing of a new NDA and MAA for omecamtiv mecarbil at the conclusion of the COMET-HF trial, FDA and/or EMA may require that patients treated with omecamtiv mecarbil have their blood monitored during titration for concentrations of the drug in order to ensure optimized dosing that maximizes benefits without undue risk. We have contracted with Microgenics Corporation, a subsidiary of Thermo Fisher, to develop and eventually commercialize an antibody-based immunoassay for blood concentrations of omecamtiv mecarbil. The development, manufacture and regulatory approval of an antibody-based immunoassay, however, may be complex and/or time consuming. Such an immunoassay could require regulatory clearance by FDA as a companion diagnostic device or similar regulatory clearance by EMA, and there is no assurance that such regulatory clearance will be obtained. In addition, if required by FDA and/or EMA as part of any approved label for omecamtiv mecarbil, we will be dependent on Microgenics Corporation to successfully manufacture and commercialize its immunoassay in sufficient quantities in all key markets in which we may seek to commercialize omecamtiv mecarbil, failing which, our potential sales of omecamtiv mecarbil could be materially adversely affected.
Current wording
In connection with the anticipation of filing of a new NDA and MAA for omecamtiv mecarbil at the conclusion of COMET-HF, FDA and/or EMA may require that patients treated with omecamtiv mecarbil have their blood monitored during titration for concentrations of the drug in order to ensure optimized dosing that maximizes benefits without undue risk. We have contracted with Microgenics Corporation, a subsidiary of Thermo Fisher, to develop and eventually commercialize an antibody-based immunoassay for blood concentrations of omecamtiv mecarbil. The development, manufacture and regulatory approval of an antibody-based immunoassay, however, may be complex and/or time consuming. Such an immunoassay could require regulatory clearance by FDA as a companion diagnostic device or similar regulatory clearance by EMA, and there is no assurance that such regulatory clearance will be obtained. In addition, if required by FDA and/or EMA as part of any approved label for omecamtiv mecarbil, we will be dependent on Microgenics Corporation to successfully manufacture and commercialize its immunoassay in sufficient quantities in all key markets in which we may seek to commercialize omecamtiv mecarbil, failing which, our potential sales of omecamtiv mecarbil could be materially adversely affected.
Previous wording
The United States and other countries have imposed and may continue to impose new trade restrictions and export regulations, have levied tariffs and taxes on certain goods, and could continue to significantly increase tariffs on a broad array of goods, including pharmaceutical and biological products. In April 2025, the United States government imposed a 10% baseline global tariff and a 125% tariff on goods imported into the United States from China, subject to various exemptions, including pharmaceuticals, in addition to a prior 20% tariff imposed on imports from China, while suspending the imposition of higher “reciprocal” tariffs on numerous other territories until July 2025. The United States government has also specifically stated that the pharmaceutical industry will be subject to industry-specific tariffs and has initiated a related investigation into the national security effects of imported pharmaceuticals and their ingredients. As such, we currently expect that the current pharmaceutical exemption will be short-lived and that such industry-specific pharmaceutical tariffs will be ultimately be imposed by the United States government. Such tariffs will result in additional costs on our business, including costs with respect to raw materials for our product candidates and will generally increase manufacturing costs. Moreover, other governments have imposed and may continue to impose retaliatory tariffs, trade restrictions or trade barriers, which may impose additional costs on our business.
Current wording
The United States and other countries have imposed and may continue to impose new trade restrictions and export regulations, have levied tariffs and taxes on certain goods, and could continue to significantly increase tariffs on a broad array of goods, including pharmaceutical and biological products. In April 2025, the United States government imposed a 10% baseline global tariff and a 125% tariff on goods imported into the United States from China, subject to various exemptions, including pharmaceuticals, in addition to a prior 20% tariff imposed on imports from China, while suspending the imposition of higher “reciprocal” tariffs on numerous other territories until July 2025. The United States government has also specifically stated that the pharmaceutical industry will be subject to industry-specific tariffs and has initiated a related investigation into the national security effects of imported pharmaceuticals and their ingredients. As such, we currently expect that the current pharmaceutical exemption will be short-lived and that such industry-specific pharmaceutical tariffs will be ultimately imposed by the United States government. Such tariffs will result in additional costs on our business, including costs with respect to raw materials for our product candidates and will generally increase manufacturing costs. Moreover, other governments have imposed and may continue to impose retaliatory tariffs, trade restrictions or trade barriers, which may impose additional costs on our business.
Previous wording
Any regulatory approvals that we or our partners receive for our drug candidates may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or require potentially costly post-marketing follow-up studies or compliance with a REMS program that includes FDA's elements of safe use. For example, Camzyos® (mavacamten), a small molecule myosin inhibitor commercialized by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has a similar mechanism of action to aficamten and is subject to a REMS with all of the elements of safe use, an FDA imposed program designed to support the safe use of certain medications with serious safety concerns to help ensure the benefits of the medication outweigh its risks. The Camzyos® (mavacamten) REMS program requires, among other things, restrictions and qualifications on pharmacies that dispense the drug and certification, record-keeping, ongoing monitoring and patient counseling obligations on physicians who prescribe the drug. We expect aficamten to also be subject to a REMS program and have submitted a proposed REMS that is based on the drug’s inherent characteristics. The requirements of a REMS program, particularly one that includes the FDA's elements of safe use, may limit the commercial success of a drug due by making it more difficult and time consuming for physicians to prescribe the drug and for patients to obtain and subsequently use a drug. Since aficamten is a small molecule myosin inhibitor with a similar mechanism of action to Camzyos® (mavacamten), it is possible that FDA or other regulatory bodies may condition marketing approval of aficamten on the implementation of a similar REMS program to that of Camzyos® (mavacamten) instead of a proposed REMS. The commercial success of aficamten will be highly dependent on differentiation of aficamten from Camzyos®. We believe the commercial prospects of aficamten are highly dependent on whether FDA approves aficamten with a label and REMS that are less challenging to prescribers and patients than the REMS applicable to Camzyos®.
Current wording
Any regulatory approvals that we or our partners receive for our drug candidates may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the drug may be marketed or require potentially costly post-marketing follow-up studies or compliance with a REMS program that includes FDA's elements of safe use. For example, Camzyos® (mavacamten), a small molecule myosin inhibitor commercialized by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company has a similar mechanism of action to aficamten and is subject to a REMS with all of the elements of safe use, an FDA imposed program designed to support the safe use of certain medications with serious safety concerns to help ensure the benefits of the medication outweigh its risks. The Camzyos® (mavacamten) REMS program requires, among other things, restrictions and qualifications on pharmacies that dispense the drug and certification, record-keeping, ongoing monitoring and patient counseling obligations on physicians who prescribe the drug. We expect aficamten to also be subject to a REMS program and have submitted a proposed REMS that is based on the drug’s inherent characteristics. The requirements of a REMS program, particularly one that includes the FDA's elements of safe use, may limit the commercial success of a drug due by making it more difficult and time consuming for physicians to prescribe the drug and for patients to obtain and subsequently use a drug. Since aficamten is a small molecule myosin inhibitor with a similar mechanism of action to Camzyos® (mavacamten), it is possible that FDA or other regulatory bodies may condition marketing approval of aficamten on the implementation of a similar REMS program to that of Camzyos® (mavacamten). The commercial success of aficamten will be highly dependent on differentiation of aficamten from Camzyos®. We believe the commercial prospects of aficamten are highly dependent on whether FDA approves aficamten with a label and REMS that are less challenging to prescribers and patients than the REMS applicable to Camzyos®.
Previous wording
As of March 31, 2025 and December 31, 2024 we had $0.8 billion and $0.7 billion of debt recorded on the balance sheet comprised of the RP Multi Tranche Loan Agreement, the RP OM Loan Agreement, and the 2026 and 2027 Convertible Notes, respectively.
Current wording
As of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024 we had $0.9 billion and $0.7 billion of debt recorded on the balance sheet comprised of the RP Multi Tranche Loan Agreement, the RP OM Loan Agreement, and the 2026 and 2027 Convertible Notes, respectively.
Previous wording
Any termination, breach or expiration of any of the license and collaboration agreements with Sanofi and Bayer could have a material adverse effect on our financial position by reducing or eliminating the potential for us to receive milestones and royalties. In such an event, we may be required to devote additional efforts and to incur additional costs associated with pursuing the development and commercialization of aficamten in China or Japan. Alternatively, we may attempt to identify and transact with a new sub-licensee, but there can be no assurance that we would be able to identify a suitable sub-licensee or transact on terms that are favorable to us.
Current wording
Any termination, breach or expiration of any of the license and collaboration agreements with Sanofi and Bayer could have a material adverse effect on our financial position by reducing or eliminating the potential for us to receive milestones and royalties. In such an event, we may be required to devote additional efforts and to incur additional costs associated with pursuing the development and commercialization of aficamten in China or Japan. Alternatively, we may attempt to identify and transact with a new licensee, but there can be no assurance that we would be able to identify a suitable licensee or transact on terms that are favorable to us.