AMERICAN VANGUARD CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed May 29, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed May 29, 2025
AVD$0.96+1.6%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-03-28.
0000950170-24-037524
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-05-29.
0000950170-25-078615
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 33 previous paragraphs and 41 current paragraphs.
17 unchanged; 11 reworded; 13 added; 5 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (13)
Current report
Additionally, changes in the regulatory environment could adversely impact our ability to continue producing and/or selling certain products in our domestic and foreign markets or could increase the cost of doing so. We are sensitive to regulatory risk given the need to obtain and maintain pesticide registrations in every country in which we sell our products. Moreover, we are required to comply with protocols or applicable regulatory requirements of biological products. Protocols and regulations may change, or regulatory agencies may determine that a biological product is not approvable. There is a risk that future regulatory requirements may lead to delays in development of biologicals or limit growth from biologicals. Many countries require re-registration of pesticides to meet new and more challenging requirements; while we defend our products vigorously, these re-registration processes may result in significant additional data costs, reduced number of permitted product uses, or potential product cancellation. Compliance with changing laws and regulations may involve significant costs or capital expenditures or require changes in business practice that could result in reduced profitability. There is no guarantee that this regulatory climate will change in the near term or that the Company will be able to maintain or expand the use of many of its products in the face of such regulatory challenges.
Current report
In addition, we import raw materials and finished goods from countries outside of the United States, including but not limited to China. Our import operations are subject to complex customs laws, regulations, tax requirements, forced labor laws and trade regulations, such as tariffs set by governments, either through mutual agreements or bilateral actions. Tariffs on goods imported into the U.S., particularly goods from China, Mexico and/or Canada, have increased the cost of the goods we purchase. Additional tariffs and protectionist duties could be imposed by the U.S. with relatively short notice to us. These governmental actions could have, and any similar future actions may have, an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. The overall effect of these risks is that our costs may increase or we may experience supply disruptions, which in turn may result in lower profitability if we are unable to offset such increases through higher prices, and/or that we may suffer a decline in sales if our customers do not accept price increases.
Current report
Our business is subject to fluctuations and volatility in the global economy. The Company’s global business operations give rise to market risk exposure related to changes in inflation, foreign currency exchange rates, including the impact of foreign currency exchange rates resulting from highly inflationary economies interest rates, commodity prices and other market factors such as equity prices. In addition, any volatility and disruption of financial markets could limit the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain adequate financing to maintain operations, which could result in a decrease in sales volume and have a negative impact on the Company’s results of operations. If the Company fails to effectively manage such risks, it could have a negative impact on its results of operations.
Current report
The highly competitive nature of our markets could adversely affect our ability to maintain or grow revenues. Increased generic presence in agricultural chemical markets has been driven by the number of significant product patents and product data protections that have expired in the last decade, and this trend is expected to continue. Also, there are changing competitive dynamics in the agrochemical industry as some of our competitors have consolidated, resulting in them having greater scale and diversity, as well as market reach. These competitive differences may not be overcome and may erode our business. Agriculture in many countries is changing and new technologies (e.g., precision pest prediction or application, data management) continue to emerge. At this time, the scope and potential impact of these technologies are largely unknown but could have the potential to disrupt our business.
Current report
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, which has led to a conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2024. If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses, discover additional weaknesses, or are unable to achieve and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, our results of operations, stock price and investor confidence in our Company could be adversely affected.
Current report
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that companies evaluate and report on the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting as of the end of each fiscal year. In addition to the Company’s evaluation, our independent registered public accounting firm provides an opinion regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. As disclosed in more detail in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” below, we identified material weaknesses as of December 31, 2024, in our internal control over financial reporting. In particular, we have identified issues in principles associated with the control environment, control activities and risk assessment components of the Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO framework”). Specifically, a) within the Company’s Australian component (AgNova), the Company identified that the individuals performing control activities within the component were not sufficiently trained or adequately supervised, and lacked appropriate reporting lines and accountability; b) due to insufficient resources to facilitate a timely financial close process, the Company identified that there was a material weakness in the operation of internal controls over financial reporting specific to the controls being performed timely and further, within AgNova, the Company did not have sufficient segregation of duties in place; c) the Company identified that it did not design and implement an effective risk assessment and specifically, did not identify and assess changes to the business that could significantly impact the system of internal control; and d) the Company identified a deficiency that constituted a material weakness related to the review of customer agreements related to the accrued program costs and customer prepayments balances; specifically, the Company did not perform a sufficiently precise review in order to appropriately consider all agreed-upon terms with customers in its determination of the accrued program costs and customer prepayments balances. Management concluded that these issues constitute material weaknesses relating to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (control environment, control activities and risk assessment).
Current report
Internal controls related to our financial reporting systems are important to accurately reflect our financial position and results of operations in our financial reports. If, as a result of the ineffectiveness of our internal controls, we cannot provide reliable financial statements, our business decision processes may be adversely affected, our business and results of operations could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and our ability to obtain additional financing, or additional financing on favorable terms, could be adversely affected.
Current report
Management has taken action to begin remediating the identified material weaknesses; however, we cannot be certain when remediation will be fully completed, or if our remediation efforts will be successful. Additional information regarding the initial remediation efforts is disclosed in more detail in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” below. In addition, we could in the future identify additional internal control deficiencies that could rise to the level of a significant deficiency or material weakness or uncover material errors in financial reporting. During the course of our evaluation, we may identify areas requiring improvement and may be required to design additional enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. In addition, there can be no assurance that such remediation efforts will be successful, that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts or that any such future significant deficiencies identified may not be material weaknesses that would be required to be reported in future periods. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to attest that such internal controls are effective when they are required to do so.
Current report
If we fail to fully remediate the control deficiencies that contributed to the identified material weaknesses and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, our ability to accurately record, process, and report financial information and, consequently, our ability to prepare financial statements within required time periods, could be adversely affected. Failure to maintain effective internal controls could result in a failure to comply with SEC rules and regulations, stock exchange listing requirements, and the covenants under our debt agreements, subject us to litigation, investigations or enforcement actions, negatively affect investor confidence in our financial statements, and adversely impact our stock price and ability to access capital markets. The defense of any such claims, investigations or enforcement actions could cause the diversion of the Company’s attention and resources and could cause us to incur significant legal and other expenses even if the matters are resolved in our favor.
Current report
The Company’s transformation initiatives may not generate the full benefit of targeted efficiencies. During the final quarter of 2023 and full year 2024, the Company has invested in activities intended to transform both its digital platform (including business processes) and its business structures (ranging from organizational change to procurement) in the interest of achieving greater efficiencies, improving operating leverage and achieving greater market penetration. While the Company continues to pursue these initiatives and is taking all available measures to ensure success, there is no guarantee that these measures will yield the targeted results that the Company, working with its business consultants, has identified, or that the return on these initiatives will exceed the investment.
Current report
The Company’s customer base is relatively concentrated, with a small number of customers accounting for a significant portion of our sales. In 2024, our top three customers represented 38% of our sales, compared to 37% in 2023 and 39% in 2022. This concentration exposes us to potential risks, as any financial instability or changes in the purchasing behavior of these key customers could adversely impact our revenue. The reliance on such a limited number of customers makes us vulnerable to fluctuations in their financial health and could present challenges in maintaining consistent sales performance.
Removed paragraphs (5)
Previous report
The Company’s key customers typically carry competing product lines and may be influenced by the Company’s larger competitors. A significant portion of the Company’s products are sold to national distributors in the U.S., which also carry product lines of competitors that are much larger than the Company. Typically, revenues from the sales of these competitor product lines and related program incentives constitute a greater part of our distributors’ income than do revenues from sales and program incentives arising from the Company’s product lines. With the recent consolidation among domestic distribution companies, these considerations have become more pronounced. In light of these facts, there is no assurance that such customers will continue to market our products aggressively or successfully, or that the Company will be able to influence such customers to continue to purchase our products instead of those of our competitors.
Previous report
The Company is dependent on a limited number of customers, which makes it vulnerable to the continued relationship with and financial health of those customers. Our top three customers accounted for 37% of the Company’s sales in 2023, and 39% of the Company’s sales in both 2022 and 2021. The Company’s future prospects may depend on the continued business of such customers and on our continued status as a qualified supplier to such customers. The Company cannot guarantee that these key customers will continue to buy products from us at current levels. The loss of a key customer could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Previous report
The Company’s continued success depends, in part, upon a limited number of key employees. Within certain functions, the Company relies heavily on a small number of key employees to manage ongoing operations and to perform strategic planning. In some cases, there are no internal candidates who are qualified to succeed these key personnel in the short term. In the event that the Company were to lose one or more key employees, there is no guarantee that the Company could replace them with people having comparable skills. Further, the loss of key personnel could adversely affect the operation of our business.
Reworded paragraphs (11)
Previous wording
The regulatory climate remains challenging to the Company’s interests both domestically and internationally. Various agencies within the U.S. (both federal and state) and foreign governments continue to exercise increased scrutiny in permitting continued uses (or the expansion of such uses) of many chemistries, including several of the Company’s products and, in some cases, have initiated or entertained challenges to these uses. The challenge of the regulatory climate is more pronounced in certain geographical regions (outside the U.S.) where the Company faces resistance to the continued use of certain of its products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) employs a hazard-based analysis when considering whether product registrations can be maintained; under this approach, EU regulatory authorities typically do not weigh benefit against risk in their assessments and routinely cancel products for which a safer alternative is available, notwithstanding the benefit of the cancelled product. There is no guarantee that this regulatory climate will change in the near term or that the Company will be able to maintain or expand the use of many of its products in the face of such regulatory challenges.
Current wording
Compliance with environmental and other regulations or changes in such regulations or regulatory enforcement priorities could increase our cost of doing business or limit our ability to market all our products. All pesticide products sold in the United States must comply with FIFRA and most must be registered with the U.S. EPA and similar state agencies. Our inability to obtain or maintain such registrations, or the cancellation of any such registration of our products, could have an adverse effect on our business, the severity of which would depend on a variety of factors, including the product(s) involved, whether another product could be substituted and whether our competitors were similarly affected. Various agencies within the U.S. (both federal and state) and foreign governments continue to exercise increased scrutiny in permitting continued uses (or the expansion of such uses) of many chemistries, including several of the Company’s products and, in some cases, have initiated or entertained challenges to these uses. The challenge of the regulatory climate is more pronounced in certain U.S. states and geographical regions outside the U.S. where the Company faces resistance to the continued use of certain of its products. For example, the European Union (“EU”) employs a hazard-based analysis when considering whether product registrations can be maintained; under this approach, EU regulatory authorities typically do not weigh benefit against risk in their assessments and routinely cancel products for which a safer alternative is available, notwithstanding the benefit of the cancelled product.
Previous wording
Public statements made by USEPA regarding their preliminary findings in connection with the registration review of the Company’s products could adversely affect product sales and/or commercial viability. Registrations for the Company’s products are subject to registration review by the USEPA from time to time. In the course of the review, the Company submits, and the USEPA reviews, data studies. At any stage in the course of the review, USEPA may reach preliminary findings that could impair the commercial viability of a product. For example, in connection with USEPA’s review of the DCPA registration, based upon a comparative thyroid assay study (which is comparatively rare and quite complex), based upon limited data points, the USEPA found an adverse effect upon neonate rodents. Consequently, in June 2023, the agency published preliminary findings, noting its concern that based upon current, permitted use patterns, the product could have an adverse effect upon human health and, in particular, pregnant women. At the same time, the agency invited the Company to examine mitigation measures to allay their concerns, which the Company has done. There is no guarantee that mitigation measures or additional data proffered by the Company will be sufficient to overcome USEPA’s conclusions. Further, it is possible that the agency could take more drastic measures to either reduce the use or cancel the registration of the product. Regulatory activities of this nature, whether in connection with DCPA or other products of significance, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Current wording
Public statements made by USEPA regarding their preliminary findings in connection with the registration review of DCPA could expose the Company to future claims for personal injury which, in turn, could adversely affect the Company’s financial performance. In connection with USEPA’s review of the registration of DCPA products (herbicides used on high-value vegetables), based upon a single comparative thyroid assay study (which is comparatively rare and complex), the USEPA found an adverse effect upon neonate rodents. Consequently, in June 2024, the agency published preliminary findings, noting its concern that based upon current, permitted use patterns, the product could have an adverse effect upon human health. Accordingly, out of an abundance of caution, the Company submitted a significantly narrower label and voluntarily suspended sales of Dacthal pending review and potential approval of that label. Nevertheless, on August 6, 2024, the agency issued an emergency suspension of DCPA products, which prohibits their distribution, sale and use. On August 19, 2024, the Company filed a notice of voluntary cancellation of DCPA registration. In the course of this chronology and in spite of the Company’s voluntary efforts to mitigate risk, EPA has published multiple press releases in which it has repeatedly warned users of potential risk in using the product. Due to EPA’s public statements, the Company was unable to obtain product liability insurance coverage for claims relating to DCPA for the period postdating the renewal date of September 15, 2024. There is no guarantee that the agency’s statements will not result in future claims and/or lawsuits arising from alleged exposure to DCPA. Further, such claims and/or lawsuits could have a material adverse effect upon the Company’s financial performance.
Previous wording
USEPA has issued a proposed final decision (“PFD”) to cancel PCNB. In mid-2022, the USEPA issued a “proposed final decision” (a variety of agency action theretofore unknown to registrants) to cancel the fungicide PCNB, which is registered by the Company for use on golf courses and potatoes, among other things. The basis for its PFD was the agency’s initial contention that the product is persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic (“PBT”). In light of further analysis and Company input, the agency has suggested that the compound may merely have characteristics of a PBT. At any rate, then, the Company must meet a truncated schedule for defending this product, all of which is posted on a public docket. The Company has submitted proposed mitigation measures, and discussion with the program office continues. There is no guarantee that the Company will succeed in persuading USEPA not to cancel the PCNB registration. AMVAC is the sole registrant of PCNB which it manufactures at its own facility. Loss of this product could have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial performance in future reporting periods.
Current wording
USEPA has issued a proposed final decision (“PFD”) to cancel PCNB. In mid-2022, the USEPA issued a “proposed final decision” to cancel the fungicide PCNB, which is registered by the Company for use on golf courses and potatoes, among other uses. Under this mandate, the Company must meet a truncated schedule for defending this product, all of which is posted on a public docket. The Company has submitted proposed mitigation measures, and discussion with the program office continues. There is no guarantee that the Company will succeed in persuading USEPA not to cancel the PCNB registration.
Previous wording
The Company is dependent upon sole source or a limited number of suppliers for certain of its raw materials and active ingredients. There are a limited number of suppliers of certain important raw materials used by the Company in a number of its products. Certain of these raw materials are available solely from single or very few sources either domestically or overseas. In connection with supply chain disruptions in 2022 phosphorus and related compounds were increasingly difficult to source for our entire industry; ensuring a continuous supply required extraordinary efforts both with respect to sourcing and production planning. Similarly, in the first half of 2023, DCPA, the active ingredient in one of the Company’s high-margin herbicides, was unavailable from its overseas supplier. There is no guarantee that any of our suppliers will be willing or able to supply products to the Company reliably, continuously and at the levels anticipated by the Company or required by the market. If these sources prove to be unreliable and the Company is not able to supplant or otherwise second source these products, it is possible that the Company will not achieve its projected sales which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Current wording
The Company is dependent upon sole source or a limited number of suppliers for certain of its raw materials and active ingredients. There are a limited number of suppliers of certain important raw materials used by the Company in a number of its products. Certain of these raw materials are available solely from single or very few sources either domestically or overseas. There is no guarantee that any of our suppliers will be willing or able to supply products to the Company reliably, continuously and at the levels anticipated by the Company or required by the market. If these sources prove to be unreliable and the Company is not able to supplant or otherwise second source these products, it is possible that the Company will not achieve its projected sales which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Previous wording
Disruption in the global supply chain is creating delays, unavailability and adverse conditions for our industry. Despite improvement in container availability and freight costs, the global supply chain continues to present risk. At present, military activity in the Red Sea is disrupting shipping routes within that region. While not directly affecting the Company, there is no guarantee that this or other supply chain conditions will materially improve any time soon or that the Company will avoid material disruption. Such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Current wording
Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially affected by disruptions in the global supply chain, including risks associated with sourcing and manufacturing outside of the U.S. and risks from tariffs and/or international trade wars. Despite improvement in container availability and freight costs, the global supply chain continues to present risk and create delays, unavailability of raw materials and adverse conditions for our industry. Industry consolidation, coupled with longer-term production commitments, has materially affected the Company’s supply of raw materials and intermediates in the past. Military conflict or related geopolitical tensions and disputes including increased trade barriers or restrictions on global trade could result in further supply disruptions and changes to foreign exchange rates and financial markets, any of which could adversely affect our business and supply chains. There is no guarantee that supply chain conditions will materially improve or that the Company will avoid material disruption. Such disruption could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Previous wording
Reduced financial performance may limit the Company’s ability to borrow under its credit facility. The Company has historically grown net sales and net income through the expansion of current product lines, the acquisition of product lines from third parties and the acquisition of both domestic and international distributors with strong niche market positions. In order to finance such acquisitions, the Company has drawn upon its senior credit facility. However, the Company’s borrowing capacity under the senior credit facility depends, in part, upon its satisfaction of a negative covenant that sets a maximum ratio of borrowed debt to earnings (as measured over the trailing 12-month period). There is no guarantee that the Company will continue to generate earnings necessary to ensure that it has sufficient borrowing capacity to support future acquisitions or that, when necessary, the lender group will amend the senior credit facility to provide for such borrowing capacity. Further, despite the Company’s long-standing relationship with its lenders, in light of the uncertainties in global financial markets, there is no guarantee that the Company’s lenders will be either willing or able to continue lending to the Company at such rates and in such amounts as may be necessary to meet the Company’s working capital needs.
Current wording
Reduced financial performance may limit the Company’s ability to borrow under its credit facility. The Company has historically grown net sales and net income through the expansion of current product lines, the acquisition of product lines from third parties and the acquisition of both domestic and international distributors with strong niche market positions. In order to finance such acquisitions, the Company has drawn upon its senior credit facility. However, the Company’s borrowing capacity under the senior credit facility depends, in part, upon its satisfaction of a negative covenant that sets a maximum ratio of borrowed debt to earnings (as measured over the trailing 12-month period). There is no guarantee that the Company will continue to generate earnings necessary to ensure that it has sufficient borrowing capacity to support future acquisitions or that, when necessary, the lender group will amend the senior credit facility to provide for such borrowing capacity. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that the Company will be able to obtain capital on equal or better terms than it enjoys under the current facility. Should that be the case, the higher the cost of capital in a new credit structure, the greater will be the potential adverse effect upon the Company’s financial performance.
Previous wording
The Company benefits from customer early pay in meeting its working capital needs. As is the case with other companies in this industry, the Company receives cash from certain major customers at year-end in exchange for granting discounts on the Company’s products during the first half of the following year. The Company typically uses this cash to pay down secured debt and for other working capital needs. This flow of cash obviates the need for additional borrowing, which, in turn, preserves borrowing capacity used in part for paying customer programs at the end of the calendar year and, consequently, reduces interest expense. There is no guarantee that the Company’s customers will continue to support the early pay program at current levels. Further a material change in this program could have an adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and its ability to meet working capital demands.
Current wording
The Company depends in part upon customer prepayments to meet its working capital needs. As is the case with other companies in this industry, the Company receives cash from certain major customers at year-end in exchange for granting discounts on the Company’s products during the first half of the following year. The Company typically uses this cash to pay down secured debt and for other working capital needs. This flow of cash obviates the need for additional borrowing, which, in turn, preserves borrowing capacity used in part for paying customer programs at the end of the calendar year and, consequently, reduces interest expense. There is no guarantee that the Company’s customers will continue to support the prepayment program at current levels. Further a material change in this program, or customer response to the current program, could have an adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity and its ability to meet working capital demands.
Previous wording
To the extent that capacity utilization is not fully realized at its manufacturing facilities, the Company may experience lower profitability. While the Company endeavors continuously to maximize utilization of its manufacturing facilities, our success in these endeavors is dependent upon many factors, including fluctuating market conditions, product life cycles, weather conditions in our key markets, availability of raw materials, manufacturing equipment performance, retention of the workforce and regulatory constraints, among other things. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maximize the utilization of its manufacturing facilities. Underutilization of such manufacturing resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Current wording
To the extent that capacity utilization is not fully realized at its manufacturing facilities, the Company may experience lower profitability. While the Company continuously endeavors to maximize utilization of its manufacturing facilities, our success in these endeavors is dependent upon many factors, including fluctuating market conditions, product life cycles, weather conditions in our key markets, availability of raw materials, manufacturing equipment performance, retention of the workforce and regulatory constraints, among other things. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maximize the utilization of its manufacturing facilities. Underutilization of such manufacturing resources could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance in future reporting periods.
Previous wording
The Company’s investment in technology may not generate forecasted returns. The Company has had a history of investing in technological innovation, including with respect to precision application technologies (such as SIMPAS and Ultimus), natural oil technology and biologicals, as part of its growth strategy. These investments are based upon the premise that new technology will allow for safer handling or lower overall toxicity profile of the Company’s product portfolio, appeal to regulatory agencies and the market we serve, gain commercial acceptance, and command a return that is sufficiently in excess of the investment. However, there is no guarantee that a new technology will be successfully commercialized, generate a material return or maintain market appeal. Further, many types of development costs must be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. This, in turn, tends to put downward pressure on period profitability. There can be no assurance that these expenses will be recovered through successful long-term commercialization of a new technology.
Current wording
The Company’s investment in technology may not generate forecasted returns. The Company has had a history of investing in technological innovation, including with respect to natural oil technology and biorationals, as part of its growth strategy. These investments are based upon the premise that new technology will allow for safer handling or lower overall toxicity profile of the Company’s product portfolio, appeal to regulatory agencies and the markets we serve, gain commercial acceptance, and command a return that is sufficiently in excess of the investment. However, there is no guarantee that a new technology will be successfully commercialized, generate a material return or maintain market appeal. Further, many types of development costs must be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. This, in turn, tends to put downward pressure on period profitability. There can be no assurance that these expenses will be recovered through successful long-term commercialization of a new technology.
Previous wording
The Company’s growth has been fueled in part by acquisitions. Over the past few decades, the Company’s growth has been driven by acquisitions and licensing of both established and developmental products from third parties. There is no guarantee that acquisition targets or licensing opportunities meeting the Company’s investment criteria will remain available or will be affordable. If such opportunities do not present themselves, then the Company may be unable to duplicate historical growth rates in future years.
Current wording
The Company’s growth has been fueled in part by acquisitions. Over the past few decades, the Company’s growth has been driven primarily by acquisitions and licensing of both established and developmental products from third parties. There is no guarantee that acquisition targets or licensing opportunities meeting the Company’s investment criteria will remain available or will be affordable. If such opportunities do not present themselves, then the Company may be unable to duplicate historical growth rates in future years.
Previous wording
The Company faces competition from generic competitors that source product from countries having lower cost structures. The Company continues to face competition from competitors around the globe that may enter the market through either offers to pay data compensation, or similar means in foreign jurisdictions, and then subsequently source material from countries having lower cost structures (typically India and China). These competitors typically tend to operate at thinner gross margins and, with low costs of goods, tend to drive pricing and profitability of subject product lines downward. There is no guarantee that the Company will maintain market share and pricing when facing such generic competitors, or that such competitors will not offer generic versions of the Company’s products in the future.
Current wording
The Company faces competition from generic competitors that source products from countries having lower cost structures. The Company continues to face competition from competitors around the globe that may enter the market through either offers to pay data compensation, or similar means in foreign jurisdictions, and then subsequently source material from countries having lower cost structures (typically India and China). These competitors typically tend to operate at thinner gross margins and, with low costs of goods, tend to drive pricing and profitability of subject product lines downward. There is no guarantee that the Company will maintain market share and pricing when facing such generic competitors, or that such competitors will not offer generic versions of the Company’s products in the future.