Coya Therapeutics, Inc.
For the period ended Mar 31, 2025. Filed May 13, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2025 · Filed May 13, 2025
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2024-09-30; filed 2024-11-06.
0000950170-24-121837
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-03-31; filed 2025-05-13.
0000950170-25-069824
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 169 previous paragraphs and 137 current paragraphs.
100 unchanged; 25 reworded; 11 added; 39 removed; 5 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 5 previous and 3 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (11)
Current report
Recent Developments
Current report
On January 21, 2025 we announced expansion of our investigational pipeline with a new product candidate called COYA 303 for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. Sustained inflammatory responses driven by dysfunctional immune regulation is a hallmark of serious autoimmune and neurodegenerative diseases. COYA 303 is an investigational biologic combination of COYA 301 and a glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor agonist designed for subcutaneous administration. In a preclinical study, COYA 303 exhibited a dual immunomodulatory mechanism of action resulting in an additive/synergistic anti-inflammatory effect, which we believe was due to increased Treg function and suppressed pro-inflammatory myeloid cells and responder T cells. We have filed several patents applications to protect this compound.
Current report
On April 21, 2025, we published the results of the study first referenced above. The study was designed to evaluate the effects of COYA 303 (LD IL-2 and GLP-1RA), our investigational biologic combination to suppress pro-inflammatory myeloid cells, enhance Treg suppressive function, and modulate T cell proliferation, in anin vitro system of human immune cells obtained from healthy donors. The research was conducted at the Houston Methodist Research Institute and was led by Dr. Aaron Thome and Dr. Stan Appel. The research article has been published in the Journal NeuroImmune Pharmacology and Therapeutics. The study found, among other things, that following pro-inflammatory activation of myeloid cells co-cultured with Tregs, the addition of COYA 301 (LD IL-2) alone enhanced Treg suppressive function by 15%. Similarly, when GLP-1RA alone was added to the system, Treg suppressive function increased by 20%. In contrast, when COYA 303 was added to the cell system a statistically significant increase in Treg suppressive function of 42% (p < 0.001) was observed, when compared to the increase observed with each of the single agents. Consistent with these results, treatment with COYA 303 promoted Treg survival by modulating the apoptotic pathway. COYA 303 significantly reduced BAX transcript levels during prolonged incubation (p < 0.01). These findings suggest a direct effect of COYA 303 supporting Treg survival through the inhibition of Treg apoptosis. We believe that these data show that the combination approach of COYA 303 enhances Treg suppressive function in highly inflammatory microenvironments, while also promoting Treg survival by preventing apoptosis.
Current report
Research and Development Expenses
Current report
General and Administrative Expenses
Current report
Other Income, Net
Current report
Research and Development Expenses
Current report
General and Administrative Expenses
Current report
Other Income, Net
Current report
The Company had no investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Current report
During the three months ended March 31, 2024, investing activities were immaterial.
Removed paragraphs (39)
Previous report
Product Developments
Previous report
During the first half of 2023, two proof of concept, or POC studies conducted with commercially available products, as investigator-initiated trials, or IITs, reported results. First, the combination of LD IL-2 and abatacept showed positive results in a POC open label study in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. In the second POC study, LD IL-2 showed positive results in Alzheimer’s Disease, or AD patients.
Previous report
The POC study of LD IL-2 in support of COYA 301, an open label study conducted in 8 patients with AD, evaluated the safety and tolerability, biological activity, blood biomarkers, and preliminary efficacy of commercially available IL-2. Study data found that (i) cognitive function, as measured by 3 validated tools, either improved or did not decline, (ii) Treg function was significantly enhanced, (iii) pro-inflammatory blood cytokines and chemokines were significantly reduced with evidence of reduced neuroinflammation in the brain and (iv) the study treatment appeared to be well tolerated as no serious adverse events were reported.
Previous report
The POC study of LD IL-2 and abatacept in support of COYA 302, an open label study conducted in 4 ALS patients, evaluated the safety and tolerability, function of regulatory T-cells, biomarkers, and preliminary efficacy (as measured by the ALSFRS-R scale) utilizing commercially available IL-2 and abatacept. Study data showed no decline or minimal decline at 24 and 48 weeks respectively after initiation of treatment and appeared to be well tolerated in all study patients as no serious adverse events were reported. Twenty-four weeks is an important timepoint as this is the period that ALS studies are usually benchmarked to measure differences in the ALSFRS-R scale for a treatment versus placebo. Based on this POC data, we decided to design and conduct a well-powered and well-controlled Phase 2 study to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of COYA 302 (COYA 301 or LD IL-2, plus an abatacept proposed biosimilar, or DRL_AB, licensed from DRL) in patients with ALS.
Previous report
We submitted an IND with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, in the second quarter of 2024 for a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of our first-in-class biologic combination COYA 302 in ALS patients. On July 12, 2024, we received an email notification from the FDA stating that additional nonclinical data was required prior to the initiation of this study and that further guidance would be provided. On August 9, 2024, the FDA provided feedback that additional nonclinical toxicology/pharmacology data were required prior to initiating our proposed study. On November 1, 2024, we had productive communication with the FDA and believe we now have alignment on their expectations for the required additional nonclinical data. We are endeavoring to complete the required nonclinical studies and submit the required data necessary to support our IND in the second quarter of 2025. We intend to initiate the proposed Phase 2 clinical trial in patients with ALS upon approval of the IND by the FDA. However, there can be no certainty that the FDA will find that additional information sufficient or that it will permit us to start clinical trials with COYA 302 within our proposed timing or at all.
Previous report
On October 29, 2024, we announced that results from the investigator-initiated placebo-controlled Phase 2 POC clinical trial of LD IL-2 in patients with mild to moderate AD were announced on that same day at the 17th Clinical Trials on Alzheimer’s Disease Conference, or CTAD24, in Madrid, Spain. The study was led by Dr. Alireza Faridar and Dr. Stanley Appel from the Houston Methodist Research Institute. Dr. Appel is a member of our Scientific Advisory Board. The study received funding from the Alzheimer's Association, the Gates Foundation, and the National Institute on Aging, with additional support from us.
Previous report
Study Design
Previous report
The investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2 trial evaluated two dosing regimens of subcutaneous LD IL-2 in 38 participants with AD that were between the ages of 50 to 86 and had Mini-Mental State Examination, or MMSE, scores ranging from 12 to 26.
Previous report
Of the 38 total participants, 22 were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 5 days of LD IL-2 (106 IU/day), or LD IL-2 q4wks, or placebo every 4 weeks for 21 weeks. An additional 16 participants were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive 5-day cycles of LD IL-2 every 2 weeks, or LD IL-2 q2wks, or placebo for the same 21-week duration. All participants were monitored for 9 weeks post-treatment, resulting in a total study period of 30 weeks. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were comparable among the treatment groups.
Previous report
The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of adverse events, or AEs, with the secondary endpoint evaluating changes in Tregs. Exploratory endpoints assessed changes in cerebrospinal fluid, or CSF, AD-related biomarkers, and cognitive status.
Previous report
Study Results
Previous report
The study successfully met its primary and secondary endpoints, demonstrating that treatment with LD IL-2 is safe and well-tolerated in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Notably, LD IL-2 showed targeted biological activity, evidenced by a significant expansion of regulatory T cell populations in the LD IL-2 q4wks group without any off-target effects on other peripheral lymphocytes. Additionally, the q4wks regimen led to significant improvements (defined by increased levels) in cerebrospinal fluid, or CSF-soluble Aβ42 levels, an indicator of amyloid pathology, and showed a promising trend in stabilizing cognitive function, with a clinically meaningful 4.93-point improvement 1 in the ADAS-Cog14 score compared to placebo.
Previous report
In contrast, the q2wks group, representing the higher total dose cohort, did not exhibit benefits in exploratory endpoints, underscoring the importance of appropriate IL-2 dosing for maintaining Treg functionality and its associated effects on CSF biomarkers and cognitive outcomes. LD IL-2 q2wks dosing also resulted in a reduction of Foxp3 expression, a critical marker of Treg functionality (a lower level or loss of Foxp3 expression is associated with unstable/dysfunctional Tregs). While these unstable Tregs continue to show suppressive immune response in vitro, they may lose their immunomodulatory functions in vivo, potentially explaining the dose impact on Treg populations and associated exploratory endpoints. As a result of these data, we will likely advance LD IL-2 q4wks.
Previous report
Primary Endpoint (Safety and Tolerability): All patients completed the 21-week treatment phase. The proportion of patients experiencing adverse events, or AEs, was similar between the LD IL-2 treatment groups and the placebo group, with no serious AEs or deaths reported. The most common AEs in the LD IL-2 groups included mild erythema at the injection site and a slight increase in eosinophil counts.
Previous report
Secondary Endpoint (Treg Cell Populations): There was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the percentage of CD4+ FOXP3+CD25 high Tregs, mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of Foxp3, Treg CD25 MFI, and Treg suppression of T responders following both dosing regimens of LD IL-2 treatment compared to placebo. Notably, the LD IL-2 q4wks treatment group showed greater enhancement in both Treg numbers and Foxp3 MFI compared to the q2wks group. The loss of Foxp3 expression in the q2wks group (back to baseline levels equivalent to placebo) indicated that higher IL-2 dosing may compromise Treg functionality. Repeated stimulation of Tregs without sufficient rest periods has been reported to result in exhausted and unstable Treg populations. Published studies also suggest an inverse relationship between IL-2 dose and Treg functionality.
Previous report
Exploratory Endpoint (Cognitive Function & Cerebrospinal Fluid, or CSF, Biomarkers)
Previous report
Although not powered for significance, the analyses of exploratory endpoints also showed encouraging results.
Previous report
Cognitive Function: The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog14) scores on day 148 showed a slight improvement following LD IL-2 q4wks administration (change from baseline: -0.450), vs. placebo, which worsened 4.480 from baseline, demonstrating a clinically meaningful difference of 4.93 points (P=0.061). This cognitive effect was not observed in the LD IL-2 q2wks administration, which demonstrated a similar decline as placebo.
Previous report
Stabilization of ADCS-CGIC (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive Subscale) scores was observed in both the IL-2 q4wks and IL-2 q2wks groups on day 148 compared to the placebo arm, which declined from baseline.
Previous report
The change from baseline in the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes, or CDR-SOB, on Day 148 was 1.401 in the LD IL-2 q4wks group, 1.976 in the LD IL-2 q2wks group, and 1.893 in the placebo group, suggesting a 27% slower decline in CDR-SOB scores following LD IL-2 q4wks treatment compared to the placebo group. These findings suggest that LD IL-2 q4wks may be an optimal dose for cognitive effects in mild to moderate AD, which was the dose associated with a robust and sustained increase in Treg populations along with enhanced expression of the IL-2 receptor, CD25, and the Treg transcription factor, FoxP3. Furthermore, the cognitive effect of this dose was associated with significant improvements in AD pathology in the CSF and stabilization of CSF inflammatory markers.
Previous report
CSF Aβ42: Low CSF Aβ42 is universally associated with AD, and higher CSF Aβ42 levels are independently associated with slowing cognitive impairment and clinical decline. Increases in Aβ42 may represent a mechanism of potential benefit of intervention. LD IL-2 q4wks treatment significantly improved CSF Aβ42 levels after the 21-week treatment, compared to the placebo group (p = 0.045). LD IL-2 q2wks treatment did not significantly modify CSF Aβ42 levels. These data further suggest the dose-dependent effect of LD IL-2 on Treg cell populations (i.e. FOXP3) is associated with effects on CSF Aβ42.
Previous report
CSF Neurofilament Light Chain, or NfL: NfL is increasingly recognized as a promising biomarker for neurodegeneration (neuronal/axonal degeneration) in AD. Residing predominantly within myelinated axons, NfL is a cytoskeletal protein that plays a role in maintaining neuronal structural integrity and axonal caliber. Neuronal damage in neurodegenerative diseases releases NfL into the extracellular space and eventually into the CSF, resulting in higher CSF NfL levels in AD.
Previous report
CSF NfL levels remained stable following LD IL-2 q4wks administration and almost reached statistical significance vs. placebo (which increased by 217.3pg/mL) (p=0.060). CSF NfL increased by 148.0 pg/mL in the LD IL-2 q2wks arm. These data suggest the dose-dependent effect of LD IL-2 on Treg cell populations (i.e. FOXP3) is associated with effects on CSF NfL.
Previous report
CSF Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, or GFAP: GFAP is an astrocytic cytoskeleton intermediate filament protein. GFAP is a marker of astrogliosis, which is the abnormal activation and proliferation of astrocytes. Astrogliosis is associated with Aβ plaques in the prodromal stages of AD.
Previous report
CSF GFAP levels showed a slight improvement following LD IL-2 q4wks administration (change from baseline: -214.1 pg/mL) and remained almost stable in the LD IL-2 q2wks group (change from baseline: 17.4 pg/mL), but increased by 1548.99 pg/mL in the placebo group.
Previous report
Pipeline Expansion
Previous report
In January of 2024, we announced that we are expanding our pipeline in neurodegenerative conditions for COYA 302 beyond ALS to include FTD and PD. More recently, in February of 2024, we announced our expansion of COYA 302 to AD. This expansion advances our approach of combination biologics with LD IL-2 as a backbone which we believe may represent a new strategy to target complex immune pathways in neurodegenerative diseases.
Previous report
FTD, AD and PD share a similar disease pathogenesis to ALS that is associated with a heightened proinflammatory cascade involving dysfunctional Tregs and proinflammatory microglia and macrophages. We believe the biological redundancies in molecular immune pathways in these complex diseases limit the efficacy of many single drug therapies, requiring the development of novel therapeutics that can address this pathophysiologic complexity.
Previous report
We intend to file an IND for COYA 302 for the treatment of FTD after the IND for the Phase 2 trial of COYA 302 in patients with ALS is approved by the FDA.
Previous report
In addition, studies in animal models of PD are ongoing, and based on those studies, a subsequent IND may be filed for the treatment of PD. We are evaluating the recently announced results of the double-blind placebo-controlled trial in AD being conducted by Dr. Alireza Faridar and Dr. Stanley Appel of LD IL-2 (described above), one of the key components of COYA 302, prior to determining our development plan for COYA 302 in AD patients.
Previous report
In the second half of 2025, we anticipate that clinical data in FTD patients will be reported for a proof-of-concept, investigator-initiated, open-label study conducted at Houston Methodist Hospital to assess safety and tolerability of LD IL-2, plus CTLA-4 Ig Fusion Protein (Abatacept) immunotherapy. Up to 10 FTD patients will be administered subcutaneous abatacept (125 mg) followed by five-day-courses of IL-2 (1MUI/day) every two or four weeks for a total of 21 weeks. Outcomes will include safety and tolerability, impact of treatment on Treg cell populations, effects on peripheral and central inflammation, as well as the rate of FTD progression using clinical rating scales.
Previous report
Financings
Previous report
On October 21, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain accredited investors, majority of which were existing institutional stockholders of ours, for the issuance and sale in a private placement of 1,379,314 shares of our common stock, or the October 2024 Private Placement. The offering resulted in gross proceeds of $10.0 million, at a price of $7.25 per share of common stock, before deducting placement agent commissions and other offering expenses.
Previous report
On May 17, 2024, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with the Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation, or the ADDF, for the issuance and sale in a private placement of 603,136 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $8.29 per share for net proceeds of $4.9 million, or the May 2024 Private Placement. In connection with this financing, we entered into an Agreement to Accept Conditions for Biotechnology Funding agreement, with ADDF pursuant to which the proceeds received in connection with the financing shall be used for a Phase 2 study of COYA 302 in FTD.
Previous report
General and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million from $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to a $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation and employee headcount, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in corporate fees.
Previous report
Comparison of the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023
Previous report
Other income, net increased by $0.7 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to interest and dividend income earned on cash balances.
Previous report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we purchased $25,000 of in-process research and development assets. During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, we purchased $0.4 million of in-process research and development assets relating to the DRL Agreement.
Previous report
During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, financing activities provided $14.3 million of cash from the issuance of common stock upon our initial public offering, net of deferred financing costs.
Reworded paragraphs (25)
Previous wording
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results together with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth in the section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Current wording
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and operating results together with our financial statements and the related notes appearing at the end of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, such as those set forth in the section of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Previous wording
We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing proprietary new therapies to enhance the function of regulatory T cells, or Tregs. Tregs are a subpopulation of T-lymphocytes consisting of CD4+CD25high hFOXP3+ cells that suppress inflammatory responses. Tregs were first discovered in 1995 by Dr. Shimon Sakaguchi and since their discovery, multiple lines of research have contributed to elucidate Treg biology and its role in health and disease. Tregs and their transcription factors have been shown to be essential to maintaining cellular homeostasis by regulating autoimmune and inflammatory responses and maintaining self-tolerance in mammals. Dysfunctional Tregs underlie numerous disease states, and this cellular dysfunction is driven by the chronic inflammatory environment and high levels of oxidative stress commonly observed in certain diseases. Further, the degree of Treg dysfunction is correlated with the severity and progression of serious and life-threatening conditions. These and other recent advances in the understanding of Treg biology, have made this subset of T-lymphocytes an important potential therapeutic target, which we believe may provide new treatments for serious diseases.
Current wording
We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company focused on developing proprietary new therapies to enhance the function of regulatory T cells (“Tregs”). Tregs are a subpopulation of T-lymphocytes consisting of CD4+CD25high hFOXP3+ cells that suppress inflammatory responses. Tregs were first discovered in 1995 by Dr. Shimon Sakaguchi and since their discovery multiple lines of research have contributed to elucidate Treg biology and its role in health and disease. Tregs and their transcription factors have been shown to be essential to maintaining cellular homeostasis by regulating autoimmune and inflammatory responses and maintaining self-tolerance in mammals. Dysfunctional Tregs underlie numerous disease states, and this cellular dysfunction is driven by the chronic inflammatory environment and high levels of oxidative stress commonly observed in certain diseases. Further, the degree of Treg dysfunction is correlated with the severity and progression of serious and life-threatening conditions. These and other recent advances in the understanding of Treg biology, have made this subset of T-lymphocytes an important potential therapeutic target, which we believe may provide new treatments for serious diseases.
Previous wording
We have built a diversified product candidate pipeline that includes bothex vivoandin vivo approaches intended to restore the suppressive and immunomodulatory functions of Tregs. Our product candidate pipeline is based on our three distinct potential therapeutic modalities: Treg-enhancing biologics, Treg-derived exosomes, and autologous Treg cell therapy. “Autologous” means the treatment of a patient with human cells derived from the patient itself, whereas “Allogeneic” means the treatment of a patient with human cells derived from a donor other than the patient, where such donor is genetically non-identical. Our core focus is to develop these therapies to target Treg dysfunction, which has been identified to be an important pathophysiological component of neurodegenerative, autoimmune, and metabolic diseases, where new and effective therapies are urgently needed.
Current wording
Our core focus is developing therapies to target Treg dysfunction. Treg disfunction has been identified as an important pathophysiological component of neurodegenerative, autoimmune, and metabolic diseases, all areas where we believe new and effective therapies are urgently needed. We believe we have expertise in three distinct potential therapeutic modalities: Treg-enhancing biologics, Treg-derived exosomes, and autologous Treg cell therapy. Our expertise includes bothex vivo andin vivo approaches intended to restore the suppressive and immunomodulatory functions of Tregs.
Previous wording
Our lead asset, COYA 302, is a Treg-enhancing biologic, which has been developed from key learnings established in our early work and discoveries of our autologous Treg cell therapy asset. Our autologous Treg cell therapy program has completed Phase 1 and Phase 2a studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. We believe the clinical data from these initial studies serves as an important confirmation of the underlying immunomodulatory properties of Tregs and their potential therapeutic benefits. These studies have also significantly expanded our own foundational knowledge of the biological activity of Tregs and key biomarkers of disease progression and drug effect, which we believe will be critical for the design of our future clinical and preclinical studies, the selection of future targeted diseases and the overall advancement of our development pipeline. We believe our findings have also established mechanistic benefits of combination biologics to address Treg dysfunction as well as highlighted important advantages of scalability and cost.
Current wording
Our lead asset, COYA 302, is a Treg-enhancing biologic, which was developed from key learnings established in our early work and discoveries of our autologous Treg cell therapy asset. Our autologous Treg cell therapy program has completed a Phase 1 and Phase 2a studies in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or ALS. The clinical data from these initial studies has served as an important confirmation of the underlying immunomodulatory properties of Tregs and their potential therapeutic benefits. These studies have also significantly expanded our own foundational knowledge of the biological activity of Tregs and key biomarkers of disease progression and drug effect, which we believe will be critical for the design of our future clinical and preclinical studies, the selection of future targeted diseases and the overall advancement of our development pipeline. We believe our findings have also established mechanistic benefits of combination biologics to address Treg dysfunction as well as highlighted important advantages of scalability and cost.
Previous wording
COYA 302 is the combination of our proprietary low dose interleukin-2 (COYA 301, or LD IL-2) and the immunomodulatory drug CTLA4-Ig, and we believe this combination has the potential to provide a sustained and durable effect on our first series of indications (neurodegenerative disorders) through targeting of multiple pathways. Our research and clinical efforts have led us to believe that combination biologics using our LD IL-2 as a backbone modality could be the best way to treat neurodegenerative conditions that are inherently driven by a complexity of pathways. We believe COYA 302 represents the most clinically advanced of what we hope will be a family of combination therapies that all feature our LD IL-2. Moreover, given its growing list of indications, we can now refer to COYA 302 as a “Pipeline in a Product.”
Current wording
COYA 302 is the combination of our proprietary low dose interleukin-2 (COYA 301, or LD IL-2) and the immunomodulatory drug CTLA4-Ig, and we believe this combination has the potential to provide a sustained and durable effect on our first series of indications (neurodegenerative disorders) through targeting of multiple pathways. Our research and clinical efforts have led us to believe that combination biologics using our LD IL-2 as a backbone modality could be an effective way to treat neurodegenerative conditions that are inherently driven by a complexity of pathways. We believe COYA 302 is the most clinically advanced of what we hope will be a family of combination therapies that all feature our LD IL-2. Given the growing list of indications for which we are developing it, we can now refer to COYA 302 as a “Pipeline in a Product.”
Previous wording
Our operations have consisted of developing our clinical and preclinical product candidates and we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing product and technology rights, conducting research and development, organizing and staffing our company, business planning and raising capital. We have funded our operations primarily through private convertible preferred stock offerings, a convertible debt financing, public and private offerings of our securities, and payments from certain of our license and collaboration agreements. Our net losses were $4.0 million and $3.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively. Our net losses were $12.0 million and $9.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024 and 2023, respectively. As of September 30, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $37.8 million. Our primary use of cash is to fund operating expenses, which consist primarily of research and development expenditures, and to a lesser extent, general and administrative expenditures. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates.
Current wording
Our operations have consisted of developing our clinical and preclinical product candidates and we have devoted substantially all of our resources to developing product and technology rights, conducting research and development (which includes preclinical and non-clinical studies of our product candidates), organizing and staffing our company, ongoing business operations and raising capital. We have funded our operations primarily through the private and public sale of our securities. Our net losses were $7.3 million and $5.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively. As of March 31, 2025, we had an accumulated deficit of $48.0 million. Our primary use of cash is to fund operating expenses, which consist primarily of research and development expenditures and general and administrative expenditures. Our ability to generate product revenue sufficient to achieve profitability will depend heavily on the successful development and eventual commercialization of one or more of our current or future product candidates.
Previous wording
incur additional legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses associated with operating as a public company.
Current wording
incur legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses associated with operating as a public company.
Previous wording
Until such time as a product candidate has received approval of its IND application, we consider it a preclinical product candidate. Each of our preclinical product candidates is being developed on one of our three potential therapeutic modalities: (1) Treg-enhancing biologics; (2) Treg-derived exosomes; and (3) autologous Treg cell therapy. The product candidates utilizing our Treg-enhancing biologics are collectively referred to as the “300 Series.” The product candidates utilizing our Treg-derived exosomes are collectively referred to as the “200 Series.” The product candidates utilizing our autologous Treg cell therapy are collectively referred to as the “100 Series.” Currently, our 300 Series product candidates include COYA 301 and COYA 302, our 200 Series product candidates include COYA 201 and COYA 206, and our 100 Series product candidate is COYA 101. For our preclinical candidates we report external development costs and other external research and development costs collectively by Series. These external development costs include: fees paid to CROs, CMOs and research laboratories, process development, manufacturing and clinical development activities. Preclinical research and development activities often benefit more than one preclinical product candidate within a given Series and so disaggregating the data would neither be practicable or meaningful.
Current wording
Until such time as a product candidate has received approval of its IND application, we consider it a preclinical product candidate. Each of our preclinical product candidates is being developed on one of our three potential therapeutic modalities: (1) Treg-enhancing biologics; (2) Treg-derived exosomes; and (3) autologous Treg cell therapy. The product candidates utilizing our Treg-enhancing biologics are collectively referred to as the “300 Series.” The product candidates utilizing our Treg-derived exosomes are collectively referred to as the “200 Series.” The product candidates utilizing our autologous Treg cell therapy are collectively referred to as the “100 Series.” Currently, our 300 Series product candidates include COYA 301, COYA 302 and COYA 303, our 200 Series product candidates include COYA 201 and COYA 206, and our 100 Series product candidate is COYA 101. For our preclinical candidates we report external development costs and other external research and development costs collectively by Series. These external development costs include: fees paid to CROs, CMOs and research laboratories, process development, manufacturing and clinical development activities. Preclinical research and development activities often benefit more than one preclinical product candidate within a given Series and so disaggregating the data would neither be practicable or meaningful.
Previous wording
Research and development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect our research and development expenses to increase significantly over the next several years as we increase personnel costs, including stock-based compensation, conduct our clinical trials, including later-stage clinical trials, for current and future product candidates and prepare regulatory filings for our product candidates. In addition, we expect spending in 2024 to increase over 2023 spending levels and will be focused primarily on advancing COYA 301 and COYA 302. As described in the notes to financial statements contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under the terms of our license we may be required to make payments to Methodist if certain milestones are achieved. This could result in significant charges to research and development in the period such milestones become probable of being achieved.
Current wording
Research and development activities are central to our business model. Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect our research and development expenses to increase significantly over the next several years as we increase personnel costs, including stock-based compensation, conduct our clinical trials, including later-stage clinical trials, for current and future product candidates and prepare regulatory filings for our product candidates. In addition, we expect spending in 2025 to increase over 2024 spending levels driven primarily by the advancement of COYA 302 in a Phase 2 study in patients with ALS and in the preparation for an IND for the study of COYA 302 in patients with FTD. As described in the notes to financial statements contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, under the terms of our license we may be required to make payments to Methodist if certain milestones are achieved. This could result in significant charges to research and development in the period such milestones become probable of being achieved.
Previous wording
No collaboration revenues were earned during the three months ended September 30, 2024 due to an increase in budgeted spending for COYA 302. The increase in budgeted spending is a result of communication with the FDA in which the FDA stated that additional non-clinical data must be submitted prior to initiating our planned randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled Phase 2 study of COYA 302 in patients with ALS. Budgeted spending for COYA 302 includes total forecasted pre-clinical and clinical costs incurred for the advancement of COYA 302 in patients with ALS. R&D Services revenue is calculated quarterly using the inputs approach, by applying actual COYA 302 expenses against budgeted COYA 302 expenses as the two inputs. The increase in budgeted COYA 302 expenses offset the actual COYA 302 expenses incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2024, which resulted in immaterial movements of R&D Services revenue. As such, no R&D Services revenue were recorded. In addition, License revenue is recognized at a point in time upon delivery of a license or upon a cumulative catch-up in the event of a contract modification. No licenses were transferred nor were there any contract modifications during the three months ended September 30, 2024, as such no License revenue was recognized.
Current wording
R&D Services revenue is calculated quarterly using the inputs approach, by applying actual COYA 302 expenses against budgeted COYA 302 expenses as the two inputs. Collaboration revenue was $0.3 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025 and 2024, respectively, related to R&D Services revenue.
Previous wording
Research and development expenses increased by $0.6 million from $1.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2023 to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was due to a $0.3 million increase in our preclinical expenses primarily due to our preclinical advancement of COYA 302 in ALS and a $0.3 million increase in internal research and development expenses. External research and development expenses include fees paid to CROs and CMOs and fees paid to regulatory, clinical trial and manufacturing professional service firms largely in connection with preclinical activities necessary to prepare COYA 302 for its initial IND filing and launch of a Phase 2 clinical trial. We expect these expenses to continue to grow in the fourth quarter of 2024. Once the IND for COYA 302 has been approved, we intend to expand the table below, creating a new class called "Clinical product candidates," wherein we will disclose the clinical expenses for COYA 302.
Current wording
Research and development expenses increased by $2.1 million from $3.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 to $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was due to a $1.5 million increase in our preclinical expenses primarily due to our preclinical advancement of COYA 302 in ALS, a $0.4 million increase in internal research and development expenses, and a $0.1 million increase in sponsored research. External research and development expenses include fees paid to CROs and CMOs and fees paid to regulatory, clinical trial and manufacturing professional service firms largely in connection with preclinical activities necessary to prepare COYA 302 for its initial IND filing and launch of a Phase 2 clinical trial. We expect these expenses to continue to grow during the remainder of 2025. Once the IND for COYA 302 has been approved, we intend to expand the table below, creating a new class called "Clinical product candidates", wherein we will disclose the clinical expenses for COYA 302.
Previous wording
General and administrative expenses increased by $1.3 million from $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 compared to $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to an $1.2 million increase in stock-based compensation and employee headcount, and a $0.2 million increase in board fees and taxes, partially offset by a $0.1 million decrease in office expenses.
Current wording
General and administrative expenses increased by $0.3 million from $2.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2024 compared to $2.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an $0.4 million increase in stock-based compensation, a $0.1 million increase in investor relation related expenses, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in board fees and taxes.
Previous wording
Other income, net increased by $0.3 million from the three months ended September 30, 2023 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was primarily due to interest and dividend income earned on cash balances.
Current wording
Other income, net decreased by $0.1 million from the three months ended March 31, 2024 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a decline in interest and dividend income earned on cash balances.
Previous wording
Since our inception, we have incurred operating losses and incurred negative cash flows from our operations through 2023. We have not yet commercialized any product and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all. Since our inception through September 30, 2024 we have funded our operations through the sale of convertible promissory notes and convertible preferred stock, our IPO, private securities offerings, and payments from DRL in accordance with the DRL Development Agreement, as amended in June 2024. As of September 30, 2024, we had $31.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and had an accumulated deficit of $37.8 million. We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents, together with the $10.0 million in gross proceeds from the October 2024 Private Placement, to enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements into 2026. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be imprecise, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we expect.
Current wording
Since our inception, we have incurred operating losses from our operations through 2025. We have not yet commercialized any product and we do not expect to generate revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all. Since our inception through March 31, 2025 we have funded our operations through the public and private sale of our equity securities, and payments from DRL in accordance with the DRL Development Agreement. As of March 31, 2025, we had $35.5 million in cash and cash equivalents and had an accumulated deficit of $48.0 million. We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents to enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements for at least one year after the financial statements are issued. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be imprecise, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we expect.
Previous wording
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making acquisitions or capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening of global economic conditions, potential future global pandemics or health crises, and the recent disruptions to, and volatility in, the credit, banking and financial markets in the United States. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our research, product development or future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Current wording
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making acquisitions or capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates, or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. Our ability to raise additional capital may be adversely impacted by potential worsening of global economic conditions, potential future global pandemics or health crises, and the recent disruptions to, and volatility in, the credit, banking and financial markets in the United States. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our research, product development or future commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.
Previous wording
During the nine months ended September 30, 2023, we used $8.9 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $9.3 million and a $0.7 million net decrease in our operating assets and liabilities, partially offset by noncash charges of $1.1 million related to stock-based compensation and acquired in-process research and development. The primary use of cash was to fund our operations related to the development of our product candidates.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2025, we used $2.8 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $7.3 million, partially offset by a $3.4 million change in operating assets and liabilities and noncash charges of $1.1 million primarily related to stock-based compensation.
Previous wording
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, we used $7.9 million of cash in operating activities. Cash used in operating activities reflected our net loss of $12.0 million, partially offset by a $2.2 million net increase from our operating assets and liabilities and noncash charges of $1.9 million primarily related to stock-based compensation. The net increase in our operating assets was mainly related to the receipt of a $7.5 million payment from DRL pursuant to the DRL Development Agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2024.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2024, cash provided by operating activities was $2.1 million. Cash provided by operating activities reflected our net loss of $5.1 million, offset by a $6.7 million change in operating assets and liabilities and noncash charges of $0.5 million primarily related to stock-based compensation. The change in our operating assets was primarily related to the receipt of a $7.5 million payment from DRL pursuant to the DRL Development Agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2024.
Previous wording
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, financing activities provided $6.3 million of cash from the proceeds received from the sale of common stock of $5.0 million and the exercise of warrants of $1.5 million, partially offset by $0.1 million in payments of offering costs related to the 2023 private placement.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2025, financing activities were immaterial. During the three months ended March 31, 2024, financing activities provided $1.2 million of cash from the proceeds received from the exercise of warrants of $1.3 million, partially offset by $0.1 million in payments of offering costs related to the sale of common stock in 2023.
Previous wording
Pursuant to the DRL Development Agreement, we received an up-front, nonrefundable payment of $7.5 million in January 2024. Additionally, we are entitled to receive (i) an additional $4.2 million upon FDA acceptance of an IND application for COYA 302 for the treatment of ALS and (ii) an additional $4.2 million payment upon the dosing of the first patient in the first phase 2 clinical trial for COYA 302 for the treatment of ALS in the United States. The DRL Development Agreement also calls for up to an aggregate of $40.0 million in development milestones and up to an aggregate of $677.3 million in sales milestones, related to the New Territories, should all such development and sales milestones be achieved. We will also be owed royalties by Dr. Reddy's on Net Sales (as defined in the DRL Development Agreement) of COYA 302 in the low to mid-teens (prior to paying royalties due pursuant to previously disclosed license agreements related to COYA 302). Pursuant to the First Amendment, as discussed above, the first $6.0 million of royalty payments will not be owed to us.
Current wording
Pursuant to the DRL Development Agreement, we received an up-front, nonrefundable payment of $7.5 million in January 2024. Additionally, we are entitled to receive (i) an additional $4.2 million upon FDA acceptance of an IND application for COYA 302 for the treatment of ALS and (ii) an additional $4.2 million payment upon the dosing of the first patient in the first phase 2 clinical trial for COYA 302 for the treatment of ALS in the United States. The DRL Development Agreement also calls for up to an aggregate of $40.0 million in development milestones and up to an aggregate of $677.3 million in sales milestones, related to the New Territories, should all such development and sales milestones be achieved. We will also be owed royalties by Dr. Reddy's on Net Sales (as defined in the DRL Development Agreement) of COYA 302 in the low to mid-teens (prior to paying royalties due pursuant to previously disclosed license agreements related to COYA 302). In June 2024, we entered into the First Amendment to the DRL Development Agreement, or the First Amendment, with DRL and Dr. Reddy's, pursuant to which, among other things, Dr. Reddy's paid us a one-time payment of $3.9 million and, in return, Dr. Reddy's will have no obligation to pay the first $6.0 million in royalty payments that would have otherwise been payable to us under the DRL Development Agreement. Pursuant to the First Amendment, as discussed above, the first $6.0 million of royalty payments will not be owed to us.
Previous wording
During the nine months ended September 30, 2024, there were no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those described under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2023 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
Current wording
During the three months ended March 31, 2025, there were no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from those described under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our 2024 Annual Report filed on Form 10-K.
Previous wording
In addition to the equity issuance and reimbursement of patent related expenses, we agreed to make contingent milestone payments to Methodist on a Licensed Product-by-Licensed Product or Licensed Service-by-Licensed Service basis upon the achievement of certain development, approval and sales milestones (i) related to the treatment of ALS totaling up to $0.3 million in the aggregate, and (ii) related to the treatment of each other indication (that is not ALS) totaling between $0.2 million and up to $0.4 million in the aggregate per indication. We are also required to pay Methodist, on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis, royalties (subject to customary reductions) equal to 1% to 10% of annual worldwide net sales of such licensed product during a defined royalty term. The applicable royalty percentage increases as Licensed Products are used to treat from one to more than three indications and if a given Licensed Product utilizes only T-reg cell therapy or is a combination of both T-reg cell therapy and exosomes. Therefore, the lowest tier is paid when there is only a single indication being addressed with a single product. The highest tier is paid only on combination products where there are three or more indications being served. We are also required to pay a low single digit percentage for certain licensed services. We are required to pay royalties at between 10%-20% of sublicense revenue. Commencing on January 1, 2025, the minimum amount which will be owed by us once commercialization occurs is $0.1 million annually.
Current wording
In addition to the equity issuance and reimbursement of patent related expenses, we agreed to make contingent milestone payments to Methodist on a Licensed Product-by-Licensed Product or Licensed Service-by-Licensed Service basis upon the achievement of certain development, approval and sales milestones (i) related to the treatment of ALS totaling up to $0.3 million in the aggregate, and (ii) related to the treatment of each other indication (that is not ALS) totaling between $0.2 million and up to $0.4 million in the aggregate per indication. We are also required to pay Methodist, on a licensed product-by-licensed product and country-by-country basis, royalties (subject to customary reductions) equal to 1% to 10% of annual worldwide net sales of such licensed product during a defined royalty term. The applicable royalty percentage increases as Licensed Products are used to treat from one to more than three indications and if a given Licensed Product utilizes only T-reg cell therapy or is a combination of both T-reg cell therapy and exosomes. Therefore, the lowest tier is paid when there is only a single indication being addressed with a single product. The highest tier is paid only on combination products where there are three or more indications being served. We are also required to pay a low single digit percentage for certain licensed services. We are required to pay royalties at between 10%-20% of sublicense revenue. Effective January 1, 2025, the minimum amount which will be owed by us once commercialization occurs is $0.1 million annually.
Previous wording
The Methodist License Agreement provides that in the event we sublicense products and services covered by the Methodist License Agreement, then royalties owed to Houston Methodist would be computed as a percentage of payments received by us from the sublicensee. In addition, the termination provisions provide that Houston Methodist may only terminate the Methodist License Agreement, among other things, in the event that after five years we are not “Actively Attempting to Develop or Commercialize,” as such term is defined in the Methodist License Agreement.
Current wording
The Methodist License Agreement provides that in the event we sublicense products and services covered by the Methodist License Agreement, then royalties owed to Houston Methodist would be computed as a percentage of payments received by us from the sublicensee. In addition, the termination provisions provide that Houston Methodist may only terminate the Methodist License
Previous wording
In May 2023, we executed a Sponsored Research Agreement, or SRA, with Houston Methodist Research Institute, or HMRI, in which we agreed to fund approximately $0.5 million through May 2024. We subsequently amended the SRA in June 2024 to extend the term through September 2025 and increase agreed funding from $0.5 million to $1.0 million in total funding.
Current wording
In May 2023, we executed a Sponsored Research Agreement, or SRA, with Houston Methodist Research Institute, or HMRI, in which we agreed to fund approximately $0.5 million through May 2024. We have subsequently amended the SRA to increase agreed funding and, at times, extend the term. The latest amendment was entered in October 2024 to increase the total funding from $1.0 million to $1.2 million.
Previous wording
In addition, we may also owe tiered payments to ARS based on our achievement of certain developmental milestones. Under the ARS License Agreement, we will pay an aggregate of $13.3 million in developmental milestone payments for the first Combination Product (as defined in the ARS License Agreement) in a new indication. We will then pay an aggregate of $11.6 million in developmental milestone payments for each Combination Product in each subsequent new indication. Further, for the first Mono Product (as defined in the ARS License Agreement), we will pay an aggregate of $11.8 million in developmental milestone payments. We will then pay an aggregate of $5.9 million in developmental milestone payments for each Mono Product in each subsequent new indication, and we will owe an aggregate of $5.9 million if all developmental milestones are achieved for each new indication. We will also owe royalties on net sales of licensed products ranging from low to mid-single digit percentages. In the event we sublicense our rights under the ARS
Current wording
In addition, we may also owe tiered payments to ARS based on our achievement of certain developmental milestones. Under the ARS License Agreement, we will pay an aggregate of $13.3 million in developmental milestone payments for the first Combination Product (as defined in the ARS License Agreement) in a new indication. We will then pay an aggregate of $11.6 million in developmental milestone payments for each Combination Product in each subsequent new indication. Further, for the first Mono Product (as defined in the ARS License Agreement), we will pay an aggregate of $11.8 million in developmental milestone payments. We will then pay an aggregate of $5.9 million in developmental milestone payments for each Mono Product in each subsequent new indication, and we will owe an aggregate of $5.9 million if all developmental milestones are achieved for each new indication. We will also owe royalties on net sales of licensed products ranging from low to mid-single digit percentages. In the event we sublicense our rights under the ARS License Agreement, we will owe royalties on sublicense income within the range of 10% to 20%. To date, the $0.1 million option fee and the mid-six-figure up-front fee (upon exercise of the ARS Option) are the only payments made to ARS under the ARS License Agreement.
Previous wording
See Note 2 in our condensed unaudited interim financial statements found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our financial statements.
Current wording
See Note 2 to our financial statements found elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a description of recent accounting pronouncements applicable to our financial statements.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Agreement, among other things, in the event that after five years we are not “Actively Attempting to Develop or Commercialize,” as such term is defined in the Methodist License Agreement.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (5)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Research and development expenses increased by $6.0 million from $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2023 to $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2024. The increase was due to a $5.0 million increase in our preclinical expenses primarily due to our preclinical advancement of COYA 302 in ALS, $0.2 million increase in sponsored research, and a $0.8 million increase in internal research and development expenses. External research and development expenses include fees paid to CROs and CMOs and fees paid to regulatory, clinical trial and manufacturing professional service firms largely in connection with preclinical activities necessary to prepare COYA 302 for its initial IND filing and launch of a Phase 2 clinical trial. We expect these expenses to continue to grow in the fourth quarter of 2024. Once the IND for COYA 302 has been approved, we intend to expand the table below, creating a new class called "Clinical product candidates", wherein we will disclose the clinical expenses for COYA 302.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
We do not further classify or evaluate our internal research and development expenses by product candidate or by Series as these expenses primarily relate to compensation, materials and supplies, and other costs which are deployed across multiple therapeutic modalities, multiple product candidates, and multiple therapeutic areas under development.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Research and development expenses disaggregated and classified by preclinical, and external and internal expenses are summarized in the table below:
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
In June 2024, we entered into the First Amendment to the DRL Development Agreement, or the First Amendment, with DRL and Dr. Reddy's, pursuant to which, among other things, Dr. Reddy's paid us a one-time payment of $3.9 million and, in return, Dr. Reddy's will have no obligation to pay the first $6.0 million in royalty payments that would have otherwise been payable to us under the DRL Development Agreement.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
License Agreement, we will owe royalties on sublicense income within the range of 10% to 20%. To date, the $0.1 million option fee and the mid-six-figure up-front fee (upon exercise of the ARS Option) are the only payments made to ARS under the ARS License Agreement.