QuantumScape Corp

Previous wording

Risks Related to Our Technology Development and Scale-Up

Current wording

Risks Related to Our Technology Development, Manufacturing and Performance

Previous wording

We may be unable to adequately control the costs associated with our operations and raw materials.

Current wording

An inability to control the costs associated with our operations and the price of raw materials.

Previous wording

We rely on complex machinery for our operations, and production involves a significant degree of risk and uncertainty.

Current wording

Any risk and uncertainty around the use of complex machinery for our operations and production.

Previous wording

We may be negatively impacted by any early obsolescence of our manufacturing equipment.

Current wording

Any loss or early obsolescence of our manufacturing equipment.

Previous wording

We may not be able to accurately estimate the future supply and demand for our batteries, which could result in a variety of inefficiencies in our business and hinder our ability to generate revenue. Our future growth and success are dependent upon consumers’ willingness to adopt EVs.

Current wording

Challenges to accurately estimate the future supply and demand for our batteries.

Previous wording

If we are unable to protect or assert our intellectual property, our business and competitive position would be harmed. We may need to defend ourselves against intellectual property infringement claims or other litigation. Our patent applications may not result in issued patents or our patent rights may be contested.

Current wording

Any failure to protect or assert our intellectual property rights.

Previous wording

We may not be able to raise additional capital on attractive terms, if at all.

Current wording

Any failure to raise additional capital on attractive terms.

Previous wording

The dual class structure of our Common Stock has the effect of concentrating voting control. Our dual class structure may depress the trading price of the Class A Common Stock.

Current wording

The dual class structure of our Common Stock.

Previous wording

Our Bylaws could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a chosen judicial forum for disputes.

Current wording

Limits to our stockholders’ ability to obtain a chosen judicial forum for disputes.

Previous wording

Our facilities or operations could be adversely affected as a result of natural disasters and other catastrophic events.

Current wording

Natural disasters and other catastrophic events outside of our control.

Previous wording

If we experience material weaknesses in the future or otherwise fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls in the future, our business could be adversely affected. Our disclosure controls and procedures may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

Current wording

Limitations in our disclosure controls and procedures that may not prevent or detect all errors or acts of fraud.

Previous wording

We face significant challenges in our attempt to develop a solid-state battery cell and produce it at high volumes with acceptable performance, quality, consistency, reliability, throughput, safety, and costs. We may encounter delays and cost overruns related to planning, permitting, construction, equipment installation, utilities infrastructure installation and operations start-up of our manufacturing facilities. Delays or failures in accomplishing these and other development objectives may delay or prevent successful commercialization of our products.

Current wording

We face significant challenges in our attempt to develop a solid-state battery cell and produce it at higher volumes with acceptable performance, quality, consistency, reliability, throughput, safety, and costs. Delays or failures in accomplishing our development objectives may delay or prevent successful commercialization of our technology and negatively impact our business.

Previous wording

Developing lithium-metal solid-state batteries that meet the requirements for wide adoption by automotive OEMs is a difficult undertaking and, as far as we are aware, has never been done before. We are still in the development stage and face significant challenges in completing the development of our multilayer battery cells and in producing battery cells in commercial volumes. Some of the development challenges that could prevent the introduction of our solid-state battery cell include difficulties with increasing the quality, consistency, reliability and production throughput of our solid-state electrolyte-separators and cells, increasing the size and layer count of our multilayer cells, increasing manufacturing scale to produce the volume of cells needed for our technology development and customer applications, installing, bringing up and optimizing higher volume manufacturing equipment, packaging design and engineering to ensure adequate cycle life, pressure management, cost reduction, completion of the rigorous and challenging specifications required by our automotive partners, including but not limited to, calendar life, mechanical, safety, and abuse testing and development of the final manufacturing processes.

Current wording

Developing lithium-metal solid-state batteries that meet the requirements for wide adoption by automotive OEMs is a difficult undertaking and, as far as we are aware, has never been done before. We are still in the development stage and face significant challenges in completing the development of our battery cells and in producing battery cells in commercial volumes with acceptable performance, quality, consistency, reliability, throughput, safety, and costs. Some of the development challenges include increasing the quality, consistency, reliability and production throughput of our separators and cells, increasing the size and layer count of our multilayer cells, increasing manufacturing scale to produce the volume of cells needed for our technology development and customer applications, installing, bringing up and optimizing higher throughput equipment, packaging design and engineering to ensure adequate cycle life, pressure management, cost reduction, completion of the rigorous and challenging specifications required by our automotive partners, including but not limited to, calendar life, mechanical, safety, and abuse testing.

Previous wording

Our solid-state electrolyte-separator is in the development stage. These solid-state electrolyte-separators have never been used before for battery applications (or to our knowledge, for any other applications) and there are significant quality, consistency, reliability and throughput, cost and manufacturing process challenges to be solved in order for the solid-state electrolyte-separators to be produced and used commercially. We are likely to encounter engineering challenges as we increase the lateral dimensions, reduce the thickness and increase the production volume of our solid-state electrolyte-separators. If we are not able to overcome these barriers in developing and producing solid-state electrolyte-separators at commercial volumes, our business could fail.

Current wording

Our solid-state separator is in the development stage and has never been used before for battery applications (or to our knowledge, for any other applications). There are significant quality, consistency, reliability and throughput, cost and manufacturing process challenges to be solved in order for the separators to be produced and used commercially. We have had and are likely to continue to encounter engineering challenges as we increase the lateral dimensions, reduce the thickness and defects and increase the production volume of our separators. In addition, we are continuously evaluating multiple cathode material compositions for inclusion in our battery cells and have not yet finalized the cathode composition or formulation, or the design of related cell assembly components. We also have not validated that the current cell design meets all automotive requirements. If we are not able to overcome these barriers in developing and producing separators and battery cells at commercial volumes, our business would likely fail.

Previous wording

To achieve target energy density, we need to assemble multiple cell layers, enclose them within a single battery package, improve the cathode capacity loading, and address related technical challenges. Depending upon our customer’s requirements, our battery cell may require dozens of layers within each battery package. We have tested single-layer and multilayer cells in commercially relevant areas that measure approximately 60x75mm to 70x85mm, and shipped our first 24-layer A0 prototype battery cells in 2022. While we target our first commercial product, the QSE-5, to have a capacity of approximately 5 amp-hours, the exact capacity, number of layers and dimensions will vary and depend upon specific customer preference, cell design considerations, and other factors. We will need to overcome production challenges to produce sufficient volumes of our solid-state electrolyte-separators and prototype battery cells to complete development of our first commercial product and for customer evaluation and product qualification purposes, as well as subsequent cell designs that may require increased layer counts. We will need to produce these cells at improved yields without compromising performance, and while solving related packaging and reliability challenges in a way that is scalable and low-cost. There are significant engineering and mechanical challenges that we must overcome to advance the development of our battery cells. In addition, we have been acquiring and will continue to acquire certain equipment that we currently do not possess and to develop the manufacturing process necessary to make these multilayer battery cells at high volumes. If we are not able to overcome these developmental hurdles in building our multilayer cells, our business is likely to fail.

Current wording

We will need to overcome production challenges to produce sufficient volumes of our separators and prototype battery cells to complete development of our first commercial product and for customer evaluation and product qualification purposes, as well as subsequent cell designs that may require different capacity, layer counts or dimensions. We have not yet validated a manufacturing process or acquired the equipment necessary to produce higher volumes of our separator, cathode electrode or related cell assembly components that meet customer requirements. We will need to produce these cells at improved yields without compromising performance, and simultaneously solve related packaging and reliability challenges in a way that is scalable and low-cost. There are significant engineering and mechanical challenges that we must overcome to advance the scale up of our battery cells. In addition, we have been designing and procuring certain equipment to continue developing the manufacturing processes necessary to make these battery cells at higher volumes. If we are not able to overcome these developmental hurdles in building our cells, our business is likely to fail.

Previous wording

In addition, we must advance our manufacturing processes to include more automation, such as automated film handling and stacking, and to use higher volume equipment and processes, such as moving to larger continuous flow equipment. We must also continue process development and innovation efforts toward substantially shortening cycle time, improving process control, and reducing consumables (including energy usage), toward the target end goal of increasing the quality, consistency, reliability and throughput of our solid-state electrolyte-separators and battery cells. We may encounter delays or unexpected challenges in the delivery, installation and operation of the new equipment. Examples include global supply chain issues that impact our equipment suppliers, supplier non-performance and equipment damage in transit. These challenges may be exacerbated in situations where we source certain of our materials and equipment exclusively from one or a few suppliers. Further, we must build QS-0 to provide a sufficient quantity of solid-state electrolyte-separators and cells for internal development, customer sampling, and initial production of QSE-5 cells, and finally, we need to build out QS-0 to serve as the basis for continued manufacturing process development for the subsequent scale up of our manufacturing capabilities, including to support collaboration and future technology transfer activities as part of the collaboration and licensing arrangements with PowerCo as well as potential future commercial arrangements. We could encounter significant delays and cost overruns related to planning, permitting, construction, equipment installation and qualification, utilities infrastructure installation, and operations start-up of our manufacturing facilities, including those containing our QS-0 facility. For example, we have experienced short-term power outages at our San Jose facilities that have been resolved but similar disruptions may occur in the future; delays associated with material shortage and backups at key shipping ports could impact the capacity at which we can run the facility; and certain of our construction contractors have previously reported delays due to labor strikes of their employees that have been resolved for now but may reoccur in the future. We must substantially improve our manufacturing processes to increase yield and throughput to achieve the cost, performance and volume levels required for commercial shipments.

Current wording

Further, we must build our pilot line in San Jose, California, to provide a sufficient quantity of separators and cells for internal development, customer sampling, and higher volumes of QSE-5 cells. Ultimately, we need to build out our pilot line to serve as the basis for continued manufacturing process development, including to support collaboration and future technology transfer activities as part of the collaboration and licensing arrangements with PowerCo as well as potential future commercial arrangements. However, we could encounter significant delays and cost overruns related to planning, permitting, construction, equipment delivery, installation, qualification, and reliability, utilities infrastructure installation, and operations start-up of our manufacturing facilities, including those containing our pilot line. Examples include global supply chain issues that impact our equipment suppliers, supplier non-performance and equipment damage in transit. In particular, we have experienced short-term power outages at our San Jose facilities that have been resolved, but similar disruptions may occur in the future; delays associated with material shortage and backups at key shipping ports could impact the capacity at which we can run the facility; and certain of our construction contractors have previously reported delays due to labor strikes of their employees that were ultimately resolved but may reoccur in the future. If we are unable to substantially improve our manufacturing processes to increase yield and throughput to achieve the cost, performance and volume levels required for commercial shipments, our business could be materially impacted.

Previous wording

In addition, our multilayer battery cells must simultaneously satisfy all of the commercial and safety requirements of our customers. Our solid-state battery cell uses a ceramic electrolyte-separator which we believe is safer than conventional polymer separators. From time to time, we run a suite of safety tests on our prototype cells. Although certain of our prototype cells have passed these automotive safety tests, some of these cells have been tested to the point of failure when subject to additional modified test conditions. Moreover, these safety test results for our prototype cells are not necessarily representative of those of subsequent generations of our cells since safety is a function of a cell’s materials composition, which changes from one generation of cells to the another. Additional safety tests need to be performed as our materials and processes evolve and we also need to test a much larger sampling of cells to ensure statistical significance.

Current wording

In addition, our battery cells must simultaneously satisfy all the commercial and safety requirements of our customers. Our solid-state battery cell uses a ceramic separator which we believe is safer than conventional polymer separators. We have conducted, and we will continue to conduct, a suite of performance and safety tests on our prototype cells, including on a limited number of QSE-5 B-samples to date. Although certain of our cells tested in our laboratories have passed automotive performance and safety test levels, some of these cells have been subject to additional modified test conditions and tested to the point of failure. However, these performance and safety test results for our prototype cells are not necessarily representative of those of subsequent generations of our cells since performance and safety are a function of the composition of a cell’s materials, which may change from one generation of cells to another and depend on the final design of the battery package. Additional safety tests, with much larger samplings of cells, need to be performed as our materials and processes evolve to ensure efficacy and statistical significance.

Previous wording

We may not be able to establish supply relationships for necessary materials, components or equipment or may be required to pay more than anticipated for components or equipment, which could delay the introduction of our product and negatively impact our business.

Current wording

We may not be able to establish supply relationships for necessary materials, components or equipment, which could delay the introduction of our product and negatively impact our business.

Previous wording

We rely on third-party suppliers for components and equipment necessary to develop and manufacture our solid-state batteries, including key supplies, such as our cathode material and manufacturing equipment for both our solid-state electrolyte-separator and solid-state battery cells. We are collaborating with key suppliers but have not yet entered into agreements for the supply of production quantities for many of these materials. To the extent that we are unable to enter into commercial agreements with these suppliers on beneficial terms, or these suppliers experience difficulties or delays ramping up their supply of materials to meet our requirements, the introduction of our battery will be delayed. For example, we have previously experienced minor disruptions to the supply of process gas due to the shortage of truck drivers related to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to an incident at our main supplier’s facilities, and have also experienced and could continue to experience disruption to the supply of petroleum-derived products as a result of certain weather and geopolitical events and conflicts and any related political or economic responses and counter-responses or otherwise by various global actors. The war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions against Russia by certain countries has also led to, and a further escalation of the armed conflict in the Middle East could also lead to, an increase in the price of petroleum and petroleum-derived products, which has in certain instances increased and may in the future further increase the cost of manufacturing, input material pricing and logistics costs.

Current wording

We rely on third-party suppliers for components and equipment necessary to develop and manufacture our solid-state batteries, including key supplies, such as our cathode material and manufacturing equipment for both our solid-state separator and solid-state battery cells. We are collaborating with key suppliers but have not yet entered into agreements for the supply of production quantities for many of these materials. To the extent that we are unable to enter into commercial agreements with these suppliers on beneficial terms, or these suppliers experience difficulties or delays ramping up their supply of materials to meet our requirements, the introduction of our battery will be delayed. For example, we have previously experienced minor disruptions to the supply of process gas due to the shortage of truck drivers related to the COVID-19 pandemic and due to an incident at our main supplier’s facilities, and have also experienced and could continue to experience disruption to the supply of petroleum-derived products as a result of certain weather and geopolitical events and conflicts and any related political or economic responses and counter-responses or otherwise by various global actors. The war in Ukraine and resulting sanctions against Russia by certain countries has also led to, and a further escalation of the armed conflict in the Middle East could also lead to, an increase in the price of petroleum and petroleum-derived products, which has in certain instances increased and may in the future further increase the cost of manufacturing, input material pricing and logistics costs. These challenges may be exacerbated in situations where we source certain of our materials and equipment exclusively from one or a few suppliers.

Previous wording

Currency fluctuations, trade barriers, tariffs or shortages and other general economic or political conditions may limit our ability to obtain key components or equipment for our solid-state batteries or significantly increase freight charges, raw material costs and other expenses associated with our business, which could further materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

Current wording

Currency fluctuations, trade barriers, tariffs or shortages and other general economic or political conditions may limit our ability to obtain key materials, components or equipment for our solid-state batteries or significantly increase freight charges, raw material costs and other expenses associated with our business, which could further materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In particular, tariffs—whether imposed as part of trade disputes, protective measures, or broader geopolitical strategies—could substantially drive up the cost of components and materials critical to our operations, putting significant pressure on our overall cost structure. For example, in February 2025, the United States imposed additional tariffs on imports from China, and significantly increased those tariffs in April 2025. These tariffs, any additional tariffs imposed on foreign goods, as well as retaliation by a foreign government against such tariffs or policies may affect, directly or indirectly, the prices and supply of key materials necessary for our or our supply chain operations. Such developments may also create uncertainty in the supplier landscape, causing suppliers to reassess their own sourcing strategies or delay shipments, further impacting our ability to plan and execute on our operational goals. We may also be subject to a number of geopolitical risks, including U.S. and foreign government trade restrictions or sanctions and any political or economic responses or counter-responses to such restrictions or sanctions. As global competition for raw materials continues to intensify, particularly in light of rising demand for battery technologies, including due to policy-driven market instability or the reallocation of global supply in response to protectionist measures, we may face difficulties securing critical supplies on favorable terms or at all, which could materially harm our ability to produce batteries at scale and threaten the viability of our business.

Previous wording

We may be unable to adequately control the costs associated with our operations and the components necessary to build our solid-state battery cells, and, if we are unable to control these costs and achieve cost advantages in our production of our solid-state battery cells at scale, our business will be adversely affected.

Current wording

We may be unable to adequately control the costs associated with our operations and the components necessary to develop and commercialize our solid-state battery technology, and, if we are unable to control these costs and achieve cost advantages, our business will be adversely affected.

Previous wording

We require significant capital to develop and grow our business and expect to incur significant expenses, including those relating to research and development, raw material procurement, leases, sales and distribution as we build our brand and market our batteries, and general and administrative costs as we scale our operations, including our costs of our activities under the Collaboration Agreement. For example, there has been volatility in prices and availability of raw material such as cobalt, nickel, and lithium and such material may face industry-wide shortages. Our ability to become profitable in the future will not only depend on our ability to successfully market our solid-state batteries and services, but also to control our costs and achieve our target cost projections, including our projected cost advantage when compared to the costs of building traditional lithium-ion batteries at scale or the costs of building solid-state batteries by other market players. If we or our partners, as applicable, are unable to cost efficiently design, manufacture, market, sell and distribute our solid-state batteries and services, including under the Collaboration Agreement, our margins, profitability and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. We have not yet produced any solid-state battery cells at commercial capacity or in volume and our forecasted cost advantage for the production of these cells at scale, compared to conventional lithium-ion cells, will require us to achieve rates of throughput, use of electricity and consumables, yield, and levels of automation that we have not yet achieved. If we are unable to achieve these targeted rates, our business will be adversely impacted.

Current wording

We require significant capital to develop and grow our business and expect to incur significant expenses, including those relating to research and development, raw material procurement, leases, sales, distribution, and technology transfer as we build our brand and market our battery technology, and general and administrative costs as we scale our operations, including the costs of our activities under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement and, if entered into, the PowerCo IP License Agreement. For example, there has been volatility in prices and availability of raw material such as cobalt, nickel, and lithium and such material may face industry-wide shortages. Our ability to become profitable in the future will not only depend on our ability to successfully market or license our solid-state battery technology, but also to control our costs and achieve our target cost projections, including our or our licensing partners’ projected cost advantage when compared to the costs of building traditional lithium-ion batteries at scale or the costs of building solid-state batteries by other market players. If we or our partners, as applicable, are unable to cost efficiently design, manufacture, market, sell and distribute our solid-state battery technology, including under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement, our margins, profitability and prospects would be materially and adversely affected. We or our partners have not yet produced any solid-state battery cells at commercial capacity or in volume and our forecasted cost advantage for the production of these cells at scale, compared to conventional lithium-ion cells, will require rates of throughput, use of electricity and consumables, yield, and levels of automation that we or our partners have not yet achieved. If we or our partners are unable to achieve these targeted rates, our business will be adversely impacted.

Previous wording

In particular, while we have estimated that eliminating the anode host material and the associated manufacturing costs will provide savings in production at scale compared to the costs of building traditional lithium-ion batteries at leading manufacturers, that estimate is subject to numerous assumptions and uncertainties. To achieve those savings, we will need to achieve significant cost savings in battery design and manufacturing, in addition to the cost savings associated with the elimination of an anode from our solid-state battery cells, while controlling costs associated with the manufacturing of our solid-state electrolyte-separator, including achieving substantial improvements in throughput and yield required to hit commercial targets. Further, we will need to capture industry-wide cost savings in the materials, components, equipment, and processes that we share with traditional lithium-ion battery manufacturing, notably in the cathode, cell design, and factory. We cannot be certain that we will achieve these cost savings or that future efficiency improvements in lithium-ion battery manufacturing will not reduce or eliminate these estimated cost savings.

Current wording

In particular, while we have estimated that eliminating the anode host material and the associated manufacturing costs will provide savings in production at scale compared to the costs of building traditional lithium-ion batteries at leading manufacturers, that estimate is subject to numerous assumptions and uncertainties. To achieve those savings, we or our partners, as applicable, will need to achieve significant cost savings in battery design and manufacturing, in addition to the cost savings associated with the elimination of an anode from our solid-state battery cells, while controlling costs associated with the manufacturing of our separator, including achieving substantial improvements in throughput and yield required to hit commercial targets. Further, we or our partners, as applicable, will need to capture industry-wide cost savings in the materials, components, equipment, facilities design, and processes that our technology shares with traditional lithium-ion battery manufacturing, notably in the cathode and cell design. We cannot be certain that we or our partners will achieve these cost savings or that future efficiency improvements in lithium-ion battery manufacturing will not reduce or eliminate these estimated cost savings.

Previous wording

We expect to incur significant costs related to procuring materials required to manufacture and assemble our batteries. We expect to use various materials in our batteries that will require us to negotiate purchase agreements and delivery lead-times on advantageous terms. We may not be able to control fluctuation in the prices for these materials or negotiate agreements with suppliers on terms that are beneficial to us. Our business depends on the continued supply of certain proprietary materials for our products. We are exposed to multiple risks relating to the availability and pricing of such materials and components, including reliance upon our vendors to construct and produce equipment to increase volumes, which may lead to delays or the requirement that we make additional upfront payments. Substantial increases in the prices for our raw materials or components, which may be expected, particularly if inflation rates continue at the high levels seen in 2022 and 2023, would increase our operating costs and negatively impact our prospects. For example, our shipping costs have increased as suppliers have applied fuel surcharges. Costs for certain key raw materials and components have also increased due to fluctuations in global commodity prices. Our suppliers’ increasing labor costs have also contributed to rising prices. Given that we have yet to generate any revenue from our business operations, we are also limited in our ability to pass on the cost of any such increases to our customers.

Current wording

We expect to incur significant costs related to procuring materials required to manufacture and assemble our samples and batteries. We expect to use various materials in our batteries that will require us to negotiate purchase agreements and delivery lead-times on advantageous terms. We and our partners may not be able to control fluctuation in the prices for these materials or negotiate agreements with suppliers on terms that are beneficial to us or our partners. Our business depends on the continued supply of certain proprietary materials for our products. We are exposed to multiple risks relating to the availability and pricing of such materials and components, including reliance upon our vendors to construct and produce equipment to increase volumes, which may lead to delays or the requirement that we make additional upfront payments. Increases in the prices for our raw materials or components would increase our operating costs and negatively impact our prospects. For example, our shipping costs have increased in the past as suppliers have applied fuel surcharges. Costs for certain key raw materials and components have also increased due to fluctuations in global commodity prices. Our suppliers’ increasing labor costs have also contributed to rising prices. Given that we have yet to generate any revenue from our business operations, we are also limited in our ability to pass on the cost of any such increases to our customers.

Previous wording

In addition, the cost of mass-producing battery cells depends in part upon the prices and availability of raw materials such as lithium, nickel, cobalt and/or other metals. The prices for these materials fluctuate and their available supply may be unstable, depending on market conditions and global demand for these materials. For example, demand for lithium has increased dramatically in recent years, and is expected to continue to increase, due to the ongoing rapid increase in demand for lithium batteries in portable electronics and the growing EV and energy storage markets. Furthermore, significant sources of supply of certain raw and intermediate materials are available in countries that may be subject to political, economic and social instability or where there is an ongoing risk of tariffs or other prohibitions being imposed by the United States or the European Union on the import of such materials from such countries. There can be no assurance that suppliers of these materials may be able to meet our volume and other specific needs at reasonable prices, particularly as we ramp up our commercial operations.

Current wording

In addition, the cost of producing battery cells depends in part upon the prices and availability of raw materials such as lithium, nickel, cobalt and/or other metals. The prices for these materials fluctuate and their available supply may be unstable, depending on market conditions and global demand for these materials. For example, demand for lithium has increased dramatically in recent years, and is expected to continue to increase, due to the ongoing rapid increase in use of lithium batteries in portable electronics and the growing EV and energy storage markets. Furthermore, significant sources of supply of certain raw and intermediate materials are available in countries that may be subject to political, economic and social instability or where there is an ongoing risk of tariffs or import prohibitions being imposed by the United States or the European Union on the procurement of such materials from such countries. Certain countries are also imposing controls on the export of such materials. There can be no assurance that suppliers of these materials may be able to meet our or our partners’ volume and other specific needs at reasonable prices, particularly as we ramp up our commercial operations.

Previous wording

We rely on complex machinery for our operations, and production involves a significant degree of risk and uncertainty in terms of operational performance and costs.

Current wording

We rely on complex machinery for our operations, and production of our solid-state battery cells involves a significant degree of risk and uncertainty in terms of operational performance and costs.

Previous wording

We rely heavily on complex machinery for our operations and the production of our solid-state battery cells, and this equipment has not yet been qualified to operate at large-scale manufacturing. The work required to integrate this equipment into the production of our solid-state battery cells is time intensive and requires us to work closely with the equipment provider to ensure that it works properly for our unique battery technology. This integration work will involve a significant degree of uncertainty and risk and may result in a delay in the scaling up of production or result in additional cost to our battery cells.

Current wording

We rely heavily on complex machinery for our operations and the production of our solid-state battery cells, and this equipment has not yet been qualified to operate at large-scale manufacturing by us or our partners. The work required to integrate this equipment into the production of our solid-state battery cells is time intensive and requires us and our partners to work closely with the equipment provider to ensure that it works properly for our unique battery technology. This integration work will involve a significant degree of uncertainty and risk and may result in a delay in the scaling up of production or result in additional cost to our battery cells.

Previous wording

To achieve our commercialization goals, we will require large-scale machinery. Such machinery is likely to suffer unexpected malfunctions from time to time and may require repairs and spare parts to resume operations, which may not be available when needed, particularly if global supply chain disruptions continue or are not fully resolved. Unexpected malfunctions of our production equipment may significantly affect the intended operational efficiency. In addition, because this equipment has not been used to build our solid-state battery cells before, the operational performance and costs associated with this equipment can be difficult to predict and may be influenced by factors outside of our control, such as, but not limited to, failures by suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products in a timely manner and at prices and volumes acceptable to us, environmental hazards and remediation, difficulty or delays in obtaining governmental permits, damages or defects in systems, industrial accidents, fires, seismic activity and other natural disasters.

Current wording

Higher throughput machinery is required to achieve our goals to commercialize our battery technology. Such machinery is likely to suffer unexpected malfunctions from time to time and may require repairs and spare parts to resume operations, which may not be available when needed, particularly if global supply chain disruptions continue or are not fully resolved. Unexpected malfunctions of our or our partners’ production equipment may significantly affect the intended operational efficiency. In addition, because this equipment has not been used to build our solid-state battery cells before, the operational performance and costs associated with this equipment can be difficult to predict and may be influenced by factors outside of our or our partners’ control, such as, but not limited to, failures by suppliers to deliver necessary components of our products in a timely manner and at prices and volumes acceptable to us or our partners, environmental hazards and remediation, difficulty or delays in obtaining governmental permits, damages or defects in systems, industrial accidents, fires, seismic activity and other natural disasters.

Previous wording

Operational problems with our manufacturing equipment could result in the personal injury to or death of workers, the loss of production equipment, damage to manufacturing facilities, monetary losses, delays and unanticipated fluctuations in production. The potential risks of operational problems at the Company’s facilities also apply to individuals not employed and equipment not owned by the Company, such as third-party contractors, and our business partners’ personnel and equipment. In addition, operational problems may result in environmental damage, administrative fines, increased insurance costs and potential legal liabilities. These operational problems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or prospects.

Current wording

Operational problems with manufacturing equipment could result in the personal injury to or death of our or our partners’ workers, the loss of production equipment, damage to manufacturing facilities, monetary losses, delays and unanticipated fluctuations in production. The potential risks of operational problems at our facilities also apply to individuals not employed and equipment not owned by us, such as third-party contractors, and our business partners’ personnel and equipment. In addition, operational problems may result in environmental damage, administrative fines, increased insurance costs and potential legal liabilities. These operational problems could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, financial condition or prospects.

Previous wording

We may not succeed in attracting and retaining customers during the development stage or for high volume commercial production. For example, we may be unsuccessful at attracting additional customers, in which case we may have excess capacity in our production facilities. In addition, if we are unable to attract new customers in need of high-volume commercial production of our products, whether due to inadequate product-market fit or for other reasons, our business may suffer. Conversely, we may not be able to retain existing customers in case of delays or capacity limitations in the development or manufacturing scale-up of our solid-state battery cells, which would negatively impact our business.

Current wording

We may not succeed in attracting and retaining customers, including licensees, during the product development stage or for higher volume commercialization of our technology. If we are unable to attract new customers in need of our products or the licensing of our battery technology, whether due to inadequate product-market fit or for other reasons, our business may suffer. Conversely, we may not be able to retain existing customers in case of delays or capacity limitations in the development of our solid-state battery technology, which would negatively impact our business.

Previous wording

Many of our potential customers tend to be large enterprises that often undertake a significant evaluation process and are frequently subject to budget constraints, multiple approvals and unanticipated administrative, processing and other delays, that result in a lengthy sales cycle. Therefore, our future success will depend on our ability to effectively sell our products to such large customers. Sales to these end-customers involve risks that may not be present (or that are present to a lesser extent) with sales to smaller customers. These risks include, but are not limited to, (i) increased purchasing power and leverage held by large customers in negotiating contractual arrangements with us, including a greater ability to push back on attempts to pass on increased operating and procurement costs and require provisions that can lead to a delay in revenue recognition, (ii) longer sales and implementation cycles and the associated risk that substantial time and resources may be spent on a potential end-customer that elects not to purchase our solutions, and (iii) greater product functionality and scalability requirements, including a broader range of services. There are also only a limited number of OEMs in the automotive sector. All of these factors can add further risk to business conducted with these potential customers.

Current wording

Many of our potential customers tend to be large enterprises that often undertake a significant evaluation process and are frequently subject to budget constraints, multiple approvals and unanticipated administrative, processing and other delays, that result in a lengthy sales or licensing cycle. Therefore, our future success will depend on our ability to effectively sell our products or license our technology to such large customers. Sales to these end-customers involve risks that may not be present (or that are present to a lesser extent) with sales to smaller customers. These risks include, but are not limited to, (i) increased purchasing power and leverage held by large customers in negotiating contractual arrangements with us, including a greater ability to push back on attempts to pass on increased operating and procurement costs and require provisions that can lead to a delay in revenue recognition, (ii) longer sales and implementation cycles and the associated risk that substantial time and resources may be spent on a potential end-customer that elects not to purchase our solutions, and (iii) greater product functionality and scalability requirements, including a broader range of services. There are also only a limited number of OEMs in the automotive sector. All of these factors can add further risk to business conducted with these potential customers.

Previous wording

While we have signed customer sampling agreements with a number of OEMs, we are still in the process of development and manufacturing scale-up of our solid-state battery cells and there is no assurance or guarantee that any of our customers or potential customers will be able to successfully complete their testing and validation processes and, therefore, enter into definitive volume production agreements with us, or conversely, that we can sufficiently scale up the manufacturing of our solid-state battery cells in the time frames required by such customers and potential customers.

Current wording

While we have signed customer sampling agreements with a number of OEMs, we are still in the process of development and scale-up of our San Jose pilot line and there is no assurance or guarantee that we can sufficiently develop our solid-state battery technology or that any of our customers or potential customers will be able to successfully complete their testing and validation processes and, therefore, enter into definitive volume production or license agreements with us.

Previous wording

We depreciate the cost of our equipment over their expected useful lives. However, our cell design or manufacturing processes may change periodically, and we may decide to update our design or manufacturing processes more quickly than expected. Moreover, improvements in engineering and manufacturing expertise and efficiency may result in our ability to manufacture our cells using less of our currently installed equipment. Alternatively, as we develop our production processes, we may discontinue the use of already installed equipment in favor of different or additional equipment. The useful life of any equipment that would be retired early as a result would be shortened, causing the depreciation on such equipment to be accelerated, and our results of operations may be harmed. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2023, we wrote off approximately $21.5 million of property and equipment for assets with no remaining future benefit.

Current wording

We depreciate the cost of our equipment over their expected useful lives. However, our cell design or manufacturing processes may change periodically, and we may decide to update our design or manufacturing processes more quickly than expected. Moreover, improvements in engineering and manufacturing expertise and efficiency may result in our ability to manufacture our cells using less of our currently installed equipment. Alternatively, as we develop our production processes, we may discontinue the use of already installed equipment in favor of different or additional equipment. The useful life of any equipment that would be retired early as a result would be shortened, causing the depreciation on such equipment to be accelerated, and our results of operations may be harmed. For example, during the year ended December 31, 2024, we wrote off approximately $13.3 million of property and equipment for assets with no remaining future benefit.

Previous wording

Our relationship with Volkswagen is subject to various risks which could adversely affect our business and future prospects. There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve the milestones for the commercialization of solid-state batteries under our collaboration with PowerCo or that we will enter into the IP License Agreement.

Current wording

Our relationship with Volkswagen and PowerCo is subject to various risks which could adversely affect our business and future prospects. There are no assurances that we will be able to achieve the milestones for the commercialization of solid-state batteries under our collaboration with PowerCo or that we will enter into the PowerCo IP License Agreement.

Previous wording

On July 5, 2024, QS entered into the Collaboration Agreement with PowerCo with the goal of industrializing the solid-state lithium metal battery technology we intend to use in our first planned product —the QSE-5 Technology. Under the Collaboration Agreement, the parties will collaborate to enable PowerCo to manufacture battery cells incorporating the QSE-5 Technology, including by establishing a joint scale-up team to facilitate the transfer of QSE-5 Technology into a cell size determined by PowerCo and carrying out the activities set forth in statements of work (the “Project”). In connection with the Project and subject to the completion of certain milestones, the parties intend to enter into the IP License Agreement under which QS will grant PowerCo a non-exclusive, limited, royalty-bearing license to use the QSE-5 Technology for the purpose of manufacturing and selling batteries primarily for automotive applications, initially at one or more PowerCo facilities that together have an annual capacity of up to 40 GWh, expandable by an additional 40 GWh of annual capacity or such other capacity as may be agreed to by the parties.

Current wording

On July 5, 2024, we entered into the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement with the goal of industrializing the solid-state lithium metal battery technology we intend to use in our first planned product—the QSE-5 Technology. Under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement, the parties will collaborate to enable PowerCo to manufacture battery cells incorporating the QSE-5 Technology, including through a joint scale-up team that was established to facilitate the transfer of QSE-5 Technology into a cell size determined by PowerCo and by carrying out the activities set forth in statements of work (the “Project”). In connection with the Project and subject to the completion of certain milestones, the parties intend to enter into the PowerCo IP License Agreement under which we will grant PowerCo a non-exclusive, limited, royalty-bearing license to use the QSE-5 Technology for the purpose of manufacturing and selling batteries primarily for automotive applications, initially at one or more PowerCo facilities that together have an annual capacity of up to 40 GWh, expandable by an additional 40 GWh of annual capacity or such other capacity as may be agreed to by the parties.

Previous wording

There is no assurance that we will be able to complete the development of the solid-state battery cells or achieve the technical milestones in the time frame required by the Collaboration Agreement or to satisfy PowerCo’s business needs, or that the joint scale-up team will cooperate successfully or complete in a timely and cost-effective manner the responsibilities assigned to them under the Collaboration Agreement. If we do not complete this development in a timely matter, PowerCo may terminate the Collaboration Agreement. If we are not able to reach certain milestones under the Collaboration Agreement, PowerCo has no obligation to enter into the IP License Agreement and we will not receive the initial royalty fee otherwise due to us thereunder and will not realize any of the benefits otherwise expected from such agreement. These factors could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. The amounts of royalties to be paid under the IP License Agreement, if entered into, will depend on the performance of our solid-state battery and the demand for the vehicles that Volkswagen develops to utilize the solid-state battery cells that will be produced under the IP License Agreement. If we cannot complete the development of our solid-state battery cells, if PowerCo does not select our solid-state battery cell for commercialization or if there is a delay in the introduction of the Volkswagen vehicles that intend to use our solid-state battery cells, our business will be harmed.

Current wording

There is no assurance that we will be able to complete the development of the solid-state battery cells or achieve the technical milestones in the time frame required by the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement or to satisfy PowerCo’s business needs, or that the joint scale-up team will cooperate successfully or complete in a timely and cost-effective manner the responsibilities assigned to them under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement. If we do not complete this development in a timely manner, PowerCo may terminate the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement. If we are not able to reach certain milestones under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement, PowerCo has no obligation to enter into the PowerCo IP License Agreement and we will not receive the initial royalty fee otherwise due to us thereunder and will not realize any of the benefits otherwise expected from this agreement. These factors could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. The amounts of royalties to be paid under the PowerCo IP License Agreement, if entered into, will depend on the performance of our solid-state battery and the demand for the vehicles that Volkswagen develops specifically to use with the solid-state battery cells produced under the PowerCo IP License Agreement. If we cannot complete the development of our solid-state battery cells, if PowerCo does not select our solid-state battery cell for commercialization or if there is a delay in the introduction of the Volkswagen vehicles that intend to use our solid-state battery cells, our business will be harmed.

Previous wording

The strong relationship that we have developed with Volkswagen and PowerCo and rights under the Collaboration Agreement and if entered into, the IP License Agreement, may deter other automotive OEMs from working closely with us. While the IP License Agreement, if entered into, would be non-exclusive, allowing us to license our intellectual property to other third parties, we may still need to incur significant additional expenditures for design, development, and testing to meet the needs of these third parties. If we are not able to expand our other customer relationships, or if we become too dependent on Volkswagen for our revenue, our business could be harmed. Volkswagen may have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent with our goals. Any significant disagreements with Volkswagen may impede our ability to maximize the benefits of our relationship and slow the commercialization of our solid-state battery. Our relationship with Volkswagen may require us, among other things, to pay certain costs or to make certain capital investments or to seek Volkswagen’s consent to take certain actions. In addition, if PowerCo is unable or unwilling to meet its economic or other obligations under the Collaboration Agreement and IP License Agreement, if entered into, we may be required to terminate such agreements and thereby may not realize any of the benefits otherwise expected from such agreements. These factors could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. While we have entered into a Collaboration Agreement with PowerCo and also expect to enter into the IP License Agreement with PowerCo, we cannot predict the extent to which PowerCo’s activities may pose a competitive risk to, or otherwise be in conflict with, our business.

Current wording

Volkswagen is our largest shareholder and holds the right to designate two directors to our Board. The strong relationship that we have developed with Volkswagen, including as a shareholder, and PowerCo and rights under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement and, if entered into, the PowerCo IP License Agreement, may deter other automotive OEMs from working closely with us. While the PowerCo IP License Agreement, if entered into, would be non-exclusive, allowing us to license our intellectual property to other third parties, we may still need to incur significant additional expenditures for design, development, and testing to meet the needs of these third parties. If we are not able to expand our other customer relationships to a license or commercialization intent, or if we become too dependent on Volkswagen for our revenue, our business could be harmed. Volkswagen may have economic, business or legal interests or goals that are inconsistent with our goals. Any significant disagreements with Volkswagen may impede our ability to maximize the benefits of our relationship and slow the commercialization of our solid-state battery. In addition, if PowerCo is unable or unwilling to meet its economic or other obligations under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement and PowerCo IP License Agreement, if entered into, we may be required to terminate such agreements and thereby may not realize any of the benefits otherwise expected from such agreements. These factors could result in a material adverse effect on our business and financial results. While we have entered into the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement and also expect to enter into the PowerCo IP License Agreement with PowerCo, we cannot predict the extent to which PowerCo’s activities may pose a competitive risk to, or otherwise be in conflict with, our business.

Previous wording

If the milestones under the Collaboration Agreement are met and the IP License Agreement is entered into, we will become reliant on PowerCo to scale up and commercialize our technology, preserve the value of our license, and will be subject to PowerCo's business risks.

Current wording

If the milestones under the PowerCo Collaboration Agreement are met and the PowerCo IP License Agreement is entered into, we will become reliant on PowerCo to scale up and commercialize our technology, preserve the value of our license, and will be exposed to risks related to PowerCo’s financial and business conditions.

Previous wording

Entering into the IP License Agreement will make us reliant on PowerCo to scale up and commercialize our technology, as well as preserve the value of our license. It will also result in less direct control over decisions relating to the manufacturing of our technology and require us to rely more significantly on the alignment of incentives between PowerCo and us than under the prior JVA arrangement. PowerCo, in turn, is wholly owned by and therefore reliant on Volkswagen and its financial and operational resources. PowerCo faces their own risks such as technology development and scale-up, obtaining capital, executing business plans, managing labor relations, maintaining supplier and customer relationships, and other general macroeconomic and business risks. Changes in or poor execution of business plans by PowerCo or Volkswagen, including any decision by Volkswagen to reduce or terminate the business of PowerCo, or to reduce investments in EV production by implementing cost-cutting plans in Germany or otherwise, could adversely harm our business. Additionally, verifying royalty amounts owed to us under the IP License Agreement may be difficult. While the agreement will require PowerCo to provide reasonable documentation supporting royalties and grant us the right to audit their books and records, these audits can be expensive and time-consuming, potentially adversely affecting our financial condition and operating results.

Current wording

Additionally, verifying royalty amounts owed to us under the PowerCo IP License Agreement may be difficult. While the agreement will require PowerCo to provide reasonable documentation supporting royalties and grant us the right to audit their books and records, these audits can be expensive and time-consuming, potentially adversely affecting our financial condition and operating results.

Previous wording

Our existing and future commercial agreements may limit or delay our ability to collaborate with other customers and commercialize our intellectual property, including certain intellectual property jointly developed under such agreements. Additionally, certain agreements may require us to prioritize certain customers’ commercialization efforts and provide them with advantageous business terms, restricting our ability to negotiate competitive terms with others and potentially reducing our potential revenue from royalty payments. These obligations could deter other potential partners and limit or delay our opportunities to generate revenue through licensing our technology, impacting our overall business flexibility and financial outcomes.

Current wording

Our existing and future commercial agreements may limit or delay our ability to expand our customer base, collaborate with other customers and commercialize our intellectual property, including certain intellectual property jointly developed under such agreements. Certain agreements may also require us to prioritize certain customers’ commercialization efforts and focus on developing products that are configured to our customers’ specifications with potentially limited end-use applications, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations if we divert resources to address these customer specific requirements and obligations. Additionally, certain agreements may require us to provide certain customers with advantageous business terms, restricting our ability to negotiate competitive terms with others and potentially reduce our anticipated revenue from royalty payments. These obligations could deter other potential partners and limit or delay our opportunities to generate revenue through licensing our technology, impacting our overall business flexibility and financial outcomes. The concentration of our customer base increases our risks related to the financial condition of our customers, and the fluctuations in financial condition of a single customer or the failure of a single customer to perform its obligations could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow.