Skip to main content

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.

For the period ended Mar 24, 2025. Filed Mar 24, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.

Mar 24, 2025 · Filed Mar 24, 2025

AJG$281.61-2.3%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits

Compensation Decision-Making Process

Compensation Decision-Making Process The Compensation Committee is responsible for determining compensation opportunities for our named executive officers, establishing the annual total value to be transferred through our equity plans, setting thresholds, targets and maximum awards for incentive compensation, establishing performance measures and approving final award amounts. To determine compensation opportunities for our named executive officers, the Committee takes into account the compensation objectives noted earlier under Components of Compensation for Named Executive Officers, compensation data for our comparison groups, trends in the financial service and insurance brokerage sectors and the strategic value of a given role, among other factors. The Compensation Committee may delegate all or a portion of its duties and responsibilities to a subcommittee of the Compensation Committee, members of the Board or officers or other employees of the company all or any portion of the Committee’s authority, duties and responsibilities, to the extent permitted by law or applicable plan documents. Tally Sheets The Compensation Committee also considers the data compiled in a tally sheet prepared by management for each named executive officer. Tally sheets provide: •a comprehensive view of our compensation payout exposure under various termination scenarios (for example, voluntary or involuntary termination, retirement, and change in control); •details regarding all compensation, benefits and perquisites delivered to our named executive officers during the most recent four-year period and a projection for the coming year; and •an analysis of equity and deferred compensation, which provides insight into total wealth accumulation for each officer, as well as the sensitivity of these figures to changes in our stock price. This information provides a comprehensive context in which the Committee can determine the appropriate type and amount of compensation for each named executive officer. Role of the CEO At the beginning of each year, Pat Gallagher proposes performance objectives for the company and himself. The Compensation Committee and the Board review these objectives with Mr. Gallagher and make modifications as necessary. Following this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee and the Board finalize and approve the objectives for Mr. Gallagher and the company. The objectives include both quantitative financial measurements and qualitative strategic and operational considerations that focus on factors Mr. Gallagher and the Board believe create long-term stockholder value. Mr. Gallagher reviews and discusses preliminary considerations regarding his own compensation with the Compensation Committee but does not participate in the Committee’s final determination of his compensation. Mr. Gallagher also reviews the performance of each other named executive officer and presents a summary of these performance reviews to the Committee, along with preliminary recommendations regarding salary adjustments, if any, and annual award amounts.Role of the Compensation Consultant The Compensation Committee retained Pearl Meyer as its independent executive compensation consultant. In connection with its engagement, Pearl Meyer attended meetings of the Compensation Committee, reviewed 2024 proxy season results and implications for our pay practices; assisted in the review and confirmation of our peer group for executive compensation and performance review purposes; provided updates on emerging executive compensation trends, including proxy advisory firm and regulatory developments; and reviewed and assessed individual elements of our pay programs for executive officers, including the competitiveness of pay levels and incentive program design. The Committee assessed Pearl Meyer’s independence pursuant to SEC and NYSE rules and concluded that no conflict of interest exists that would prevent Pearl Meyer from serving as an independent consultant to the Committee.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.