Skip to main content

Seres Therapeutics Inc

For the period ended Mar 13, 2025. Filed Mar 13, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.

Mar 13, 2025 · Filed Mar 13, 2025

MCRB$1.98-5.3%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Pay Versus Performance

In accordance with the SEC’s disclosure requirements regarding pay versus performance, this section presents the SEC-defined “Compensation Actually Paid,” or CAP. Also required by the SEC, this section compares CAP to various measures used to gauge our performance. CAP is a supplemental measure to be viewed alongside performance measures as an addition to the philosophy and strategy of compensation-setting discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement, not in replacement.

Pay Versus Performance Table

The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of our NEOs for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024, and our financial performance for each such fiscal year:

YearSummary Compensation Table Total for PEO ($)Compensation Actually Paid to PEO ($)(1)(2)Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($)Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs ($)(1)(2)Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment Based on Total Shareholder Return ($)Net Income ($)
20242,682,0071,906,3251,259,430988,40024136,000
20233,158,336(517,565)1,695,799260,83141(113,724,000)
20224,006,2481,574,3211,706,6331,109,334162(250,157,000)

(1)

Amounts represent compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our remaining NEOs for the relevant fiscal year, as determined under SEC rules (and described below), which includes the individuals indicated in the table below for each fiscal year:

YearPEONon-PEO NEOs
2024Eric ShaffLisa von Moltke, M.D., and Thomas J. DesRosier
2023Eric ShaffTeresa L. Young, Ph.D. and Lisa von Moltke, M.D.
2022Eric ShaffDavid Arkowitz, Lisa von Moltke, M.D., Matthew Henn, Ph.D., and Paula A. Cloghessy

Compensation actually paid to our NEOs represents the “Total” compensation reported in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable fiscal year, as adjusted as follows:

Adjustments2024
PEOAverage Non-PEO NEOs
Deduction for Amounts Reported under the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” Columns in the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY(1,576,710)(541,365)
Increase Based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Remain Unvested as of Applicable FY End, Determined as of Applicable FY End1,142,179391,699
Increase Based on ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Applicable FY that Vested during Applicable FY, Determined as of Vesting Date00
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Outstanding and Unvested as of Applicable FY End, Determined Based on Change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Applicable FY End(204,725)(68,859)
Increase/deduction for Awards Granted during Prior FY that Vested During Applicable FY, Determined Based on Change in ASC 718 Fair Value from Prior FY End to Vesting Date(136,426)(52,504)
Deduction of ASC 718 Fair Value of Awards Granted during Prior FY that were Forfeited during Applicable FY, Determined as of Prior FY End00
Increase Based on Dividends or Other Earnings Paid during Applicable FY prior to Vesting Date00
Increase Based on Incremental Fair Value of Options/SARs Modified during Applicable FY00
Deduction for Change in the Actuarial Present Values Reported under the “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” Column of the Summary Compensation Table for Applicable FY00
Increase for Service Cost and, if Applicable, Prior Service Cost for Pension Plans00
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS(775,682)(271,029)

(2)

Fair value or change in fair value, as applicable, of equity awards in the “Compensation Actually Paid” columns was determined by reference to (i) for solely service-vesting RSU awards, the closing price per share on the applicable year-end date(s) or, in the case of vesting dates, the closing price per share on the applicable vesting date(s); (ii) for performance-based RSU awards, the same valuation methodology as RSU awards above except that the year-end values are multiplied by the probability of achievement of the applicable performance objective as of the applicable date; and (iii) for stock options, a Black Scholes value as of the applicable year-end or vesting date(s), determined based on the same methodology as used to determine grant date fair value but using the closing stock price on the applicable revaluation date as the current market price and with an expected life set equal to the original expected life determined at grant, reduced by the amount of time elapsed from the grant date to the revaluation date, and adjusted based on relevant factors, including taking into account the stock price on the applicable revaluation date relative to the option’s strike price determined at grant, and in all cases based on volatility and risk free rates determined as of the revaluation date based on the expected life period and based on an expected dividend rate of 0%. For additional information on the assumptions used to calculate the valuation of the awards, see the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024 and prior fiscal years.

Narrative Disclosure to Pay Versus Performance Table

Relationship Between Financial Performance Measures

The graphs below compares the compensation actually paid to our PEO and the average of the compensation actually paid to our remaining NEOs, with (i) our cumulative TSR, and (ii) our net income, in each case, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022, 2023 and 2024. TSR amounts reported in the graph assume an initial fixed investment of $100.

Policies and Practices Relating to the Timing of Equity Awards

Our general practice is to not grant equity awards in anticipation of the release of material nonpublic information or time the release of material nonpublic information for the purpose of affecting the value of executive compensation. The Compensation and Talent Committee uses its business judgment to determine the size of our equity awards and would consider any material nonpublic information that is known to the Compensation and Talent Committee before granting an award. Although we do not have a formal policy with respect to the timing of our equity award grants, the Compensation and Talent Committee has historically granted awards on a predetermined annual schedule.

During 2024, we did not grant stock options to our NEOs during the four business days prior to or the one business day following the filing of our periodic reports or the filing or furnishing of a Form 8-K that discloses material nonpublic information.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.