BLUE RIDGE BANKSHARES INC

Previous wording

On January 24, 2024, the Bank consented to the issuance of the Consent Order by the OCC. The Consent Order replaces the Written Agreement entered into by the Bank with the OCC on August 29, 2022. The Consent Order generally incorporates the prior provisions of the Written Agreement, as well as adding new provisions. The Consent Order requires the Bank and/or the board of directors of the Bank to, among other things, address and remediate Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering deficiencies, violations and corrective actions, enhance oversight of its third-party partnerships, submit to the OCC acceptable strategic and capital plans, and adopt, implement, and adhere to various revised and expanded risk-based policies, procedures, and processes. While subject to the Consent Order, the Bank will also be required to obtain an OCC non-objection prior to onboarding or signing a contract with a new third-party fintech relationship or offering new products or services or conducting new activities with or through existing third-party fintech relationships.

Current wording

On January 24, 2024, the Bank consented to the issuance of the Consent Order by the OCC. The Consent Order replaces the Written Agreement entered into by the Bank with the OCC on August 29, 2022. The Consent Order generally incorporates the prior provisions of the Written Agreement, as well as adding new provisions. The Consent Order requires the Bank and/or the board of directors of the Bank to, among other things, address and remediate BSA/AML deficiencies, violations and corrective actions, enhance oversight of its third-party partnerships, submit to the OCC acceptable strategic and capital plans, and adopt, implement, and adhere to various revised and expanded risk-based policies, procedures, and processes. While subject to the Consent Order, the Bank will also be required to obtain non-objection from the OCC prior to onboarding or signing a contract with a new third-party fintech relationship or offering new products or services or conducting new activities with or through existing third-party fintech relationships.

Previous wording

The Company's management and board of directors have devoted and expect to continue to devote considerable time, attention, and resources on developing, implementing, and monitoring corrective actions to comply with the terms of the Consent Order. The Company is also utilizing third-party consultants and other advisors to assist in complying with the Consent Order and noninterest expense has increased, and may continue to increase, as a result. In addition, the Company's noninterest income and deposits may decrease to the extent that the Company changes or terminates certain fintech relationships or products or is unable to successfully create new fintech relationships or products while subject to the Consent Order.

Current wording

The Company's management and board of directors have devoted and expect to continue to devote considerable time, attention, and resources on developing, implementing, and monitoring corrective actions to comply with the terms of the Consent Order. The Company is also utilizing third-party consultants and other advisors to assist in complying with the Consent Order and noninterest expense has increased, and may continue to increase, as a result.

Previous wording

The Company’s business strategy over the past several years had included growing partnerships with fintech companies, which serve as a source of loan and deposit growth, interest and noninterest income, and technology-related solutions for the Company. The fintech BaaS partnerships have resulted, among other things, in rapid growth in the Company’s deposit base. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, fintech-related deposits accounted for $465.9 million and $690.2 million, respectively, of the Company's deposits. Of this, BaaS deposits of $371.0 million and $462.9 million were related to approximately 240,000 and 185,000 accounts of active end users as of December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively. This rapid increase in deposit accounts necessitates enhanced operational and control systems and additional qualified personnel to oversee and manage the increased operational and compliance burdens from these accounts, including those resulting from increased account opening, suspicious activity monitoring, network security controls related to ACH and payment systems, protection of customer records and data confidentiality, and consumer compliance matters, among others. In consideration of the risk profile of fintech operations and the Consent Order, the Company plans to substantially exit its fintech BaaS relationships. If the Company is not able to timely wind down the Company's BaaS fintech activities, effectively monitor indirect lending activities, or implement and maintain improved systems to monitor and control these additional burdens, the Company could be subject to additional supervisory actions, operational and compliance risks, and reputational harm, and could experience material adverse consequences on its business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Starting in 2019 through late 2023, the Company’s business strategy included growing partnerships with fintech companies, which served as a source of loan and deposit growth, interest and noninterest income, and technology-related solutions for the Company. The fintech BaaS depository partnerships resulted in, among other things, rapid growth in the Company’s deposit base. As of December 31, 2023, the Company’s deposits related to fintech relationships, including BaaS depository operations, totaled $465.9 million, or 18.2% of total deposits, and included $371.0 million of fintech BaaS deposits. This level of deposit accounts necessitated enhanced operational and control systems and additional qualified personnel to oversee and manage the increased operational and compliance burdens from these accounts, including those resulting from increased account opening, suspicious activity monitoring, network security controls related to ACH and payment systems, protection of customer records and data confidentiality, and consumer compliance matters, among others, and may subject the Company to additional supervisory actions, operational and compliance risks, or reputational harm.

Previous wording

The Company operates in a highly-regulated industry and the laws and regulations that govern the Company’s operations, corporate governance, executive compensation, and financial accounting or reporting, including changes in them or the Company’s failure to comply with them, and regulatory actions implementing such law and regulations, may adversely affect the Company.

Current wording

The Company operates in a highly regulated industry, and the laws and regulations that govern the Company’s operations, including changes in them or the Company’s failure to comply with them, and regulatory actions implementing such laws and regulations, may adversely affect the Company.

Previous wording

The Company is subject to extensive regulation and supervision that govern almost all aspects of its operations. These laws and regulations, and regulatory actions implementing such law and regulations, including the Consent Order, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on the Company’s business activities, limit the dividends or distributions that it can pay, restrict the ability of institutions to guarantee its debt, and impose certain specific accounting requirements that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in its capital than GAAP. Compliance with laws and regulations, and regulatory actions implementing such law and regulations, can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations often impose additional compliance costs.

Current wording

The Company is subject to extensive regulation and supervision that govern almost all aspects of its operations. These laws and regulations, and regulatory actions implementing such laws and regulations, including the Consent Order, among other matters, prescribe minimum capital requirements, impose limitations on the Company’s business activities, limit the dividends or distributions that it can pay, and impose certain specific accounting requirements that may be more restrictive and may result in greater or earlier charges to earnings or reductions in its capital than GAAP.

Previous wording

The Company faces increasing regulation and supervision of its industry. The Dodd-Frank Act instituted major changes to the banking and financial institutions regulatory regimes. Other changes to statutes, regulations, or regulatory policies, or supervisory guidance, including changes in interpretation or implementation of statutes, regulations, policies or supervisory guidance, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Such additional regulation and supervision has increased, and may continue to increase, the Company’s costs and limit its ability to pursue business opportunities. Further, the Company’s failure to comply with these laws and regulations, has in the past and could subject it to restrictions on its business activities, fines, and other penalties, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, capital base, and the price of its securities. Further, any new laws, rules and regulations, and regulatory actions implementing such laws and regulations, could make compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business and financial condition.

Current wording

Changes to laws, regulations, or regulatory policies, or supervisory guidance, including changes in interpretation or implementation of laws, regulations, policies, or supervisory guidance, could affect the Company in substantial and unpredictable ways. Regulatory responses in connection with unforeseen stress events, including failures of banks and other financial institutions, often lead to increased regulatory scrutiny and heightened supervisory expectations and could adversely impact the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations, or alter or disrupt the Company’s planned future strategies and actions. The Company’s failure to comply with these laws and regulations, has in the past and could in the future subject it to restrictions on its business activities, fines, and other penalties, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, capital base, and the price of its securities. Compliance with laws and regulations, and regulatory actions implementing such laws and regulations, can be difficult and costly, and changes to laws and regulations could make compliance more difficult or expensive or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s business and financial condition.

Previous wording

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive, or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. The CFPB has recently pursued a more aggressive enforcement policy with respect to a range of regulatory compliance matters, specifically including fair lending, loan servicing, financial institution sales and marketing practices, and financial institution consumer fee and account management practices. For example, in 2023, the CFPB brought enforcement actions against a number of financial institutions for overdraft practices that the CFPB alleged to be unlawful and ordered each of these institutions to pay a substantial civil money penalty in addition to customer restitution. Despite our ongoing compliance efforts, we may become subject to regulatory enforcement actions with respect to our programs and practices. The costs and limitations related to this additional regulatory scrutiny with respect to consumer product offerings and services may adversely affect the Company’s profitability.

Current wording

The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority to administer and carry out the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act with respect to financial institutions that offer covered financial products and services to consumers. The CFPB has also been directed to write rules identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive, or abusive in connection with any transaction with a consumer for a consumer financial product or service, or the offering of a consumer financial product or service. The CFPB has recently pursued a more aggressive enforcement policy with respect to a range of regulatory compliance matters, specifically including fair lending, loan servicing, financial institution sales and marketing practices, and financial institution consumer fee and account management practices. For example, the CFPB has brought enforcement actions against financial institutions for overdraft practices that the CFPB alleged to be unlawful and ordered each of these institutions to pay a substantial civil money penalty in addition to customer restitution and proposed rules to curb overdraft fees. Despite the Company's ongoing compliance efforts, it may become subject to regulatory enforcement actions with respect to programs and practices. The costs and limitations related to this additional regulatory scrutiny with respect to consumer product offerings and services may adversely affect the Company’s profitability. As noted previously, the future of the CFPB is uncertain, but there are other agencies that have similar oversight on the Bank's activities.

Previous wording

The Company’s business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of customer data, including personally identifiable information (“PII”), in various information systems that the Company maintains and in those maintained by third- party service providers. The Company also maintains important internal company data such as PII about its employees and information relating to its operations. The Company is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of PII of individuals (including customers, employees and other third parties). For example, the Company’s business is subject to the GLB Act, which, among other things: (i) imposes certain limitations on the Company’s ability to share nonpublic PII about its customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that the Company provide certain disclosures to customers about its information collection, sharing, and security practices and afford customers the right to “opt out” of any information sharing by it with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and (iii) requires that the Company develop, implement, and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on the Company’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of its activities, and the sensitivity of customer information it processes, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches. Various federal and state banking regulators and states have also enacted data breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory, or law enforcement notification in the event of a security breach. Ensuring that the Company’s collection, use, transfer, and storage of PII complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase the Company’s costs. Furthermore, the Company may not be able to ensure that customers and other third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange with us, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. If personal, confidential, or proprietary information of customers or others were to be mishandled or misused, the Company could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and data protection laws and regulations. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s measures to safeguard PII, or even the perception that such measures are inadequate, could cause the Company to lose customers or potential customers and thereby reduce its revenues. Accordingly, any failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations may subject the Company to inquiries, examinations, and investigations that could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or in significant liabilities, fines or penalties, and could damage the Company’s reputation and otherwise adversely affect its operations…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

The Company’s business requires the collection and retention of large volumes of customer data, including personally identifiable information (“PII”), in various information systems that the Company maintains and in those maintained by third-party service providers. The Company also maintains important internal company data such as PII about its employees and information relating to its operations. The Company is subject to complex and evolving laws and regulations governing the privacy and protection of PII of individuals (including customers, employees and other third parties). For example, the Company’s business is subject to the GLB Act, which, among other things: (i) imposes certain limitations on the Company’s ability to share nonpublic PII about its customers with nonaffiliated third parties; (ii) requires that the Company provide certain disclosures to customers about its information collection, sharing, and security practices and afford customers the right to “opt out” of any information sharing by it with nonaffiliated third parties (with certain exceptions); and (iii) requires that the Company develop, implement, and maintain a written comprehensive information security program containing appropriate safeguards based on the Company’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of its activities, and the sensitivity of customer information it processes, as well as plans for responding to data security breaches. Various federal and state banking regulators and states have also enacted data breach notification requirements with varying levels of individual, consumer, regulatory, or law enforcement notification in the event of a security breach. Ensuring that the Company’s collection, use, transfer, and storage of PII complies with all applicable laws and regulations can increase the Company’s costs. Furthermore, the Company may not be able to ensure that customers and other third parties have appropriate controls in place to protect the confidentiality of the information that they exchange with it, particularly where such information is transmitted by electronic means. If personal, confidential, or proprietary information of customers or others were to be mishandled or misused, the Company could be exposed to litigation or regulatory sanctions under privacy and data protection laws and regulations. Concerns regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s measures to safeguard PII, or even the perception that such measures are inadequate, could cause the Company to lose customers or potential customers and thereby reduce its revenues. Accordingly, any failure, or perceived failure, to comply with applicable privacy or data protection laws and regulations may subject the Company to inquiries, examinations, and investigations that could result in requirements to modify or cease certain operations or practices or result in significant liabilities, fines, or penalties, and could damage the Company’s reputation and otherwise adversely affect its ope…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous wording

The authorities that promulgate accounting standards, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and other regulatory authorities, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These changes are difficult to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of financial statements for prior periods. Such changes could also require the Company to incur additional personnel or technology costs. For example, effective January 1, 2023, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (referred herein as “current expected credit losses” or “CECL”). CECL is generally viewed throughout the industry as the most significant change in accounting standards to affect financial institutions in decades as it fundamentally changes the accounting for and estimation of the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”). The prior incurred loss approach was replaced by a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. As a result, the Company has incurred additional expenses to support both the adoption and the subsequent accounting and financial reporting requirements of CECL. For more information regarding recent accounting pronouncements and their effects on the Company, including CECL, see “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 2 of the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2023.

Current wording

The authorities that promulgate accounting standards, including the Financial Accounting Standards Board, the SEC, and other regulatory authorities, periodically change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These changes are difficult to predict and can materially impact how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in the restatement of financial statements for prior periods. Such changes could also require the Company to incur additional personnel or technology costs. For example, effective January 1, 2023, the Company adopted Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326, Financial Instruments– Credit Losses (referred herein as “current expected credit losses” or “CECL”). CECL is generally viewed throughout the industry as the most significant change in accounting standards to affect financial institutions in decades as it fundamentally changes the accounting for and estimation of the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”). The prior incurred loss approach was replaced by a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. As a result, the Company has incurred additional expenses to support both the adoption and the subsequent accounting and financial reporting requirements of CECL. For more information regarding recent accounting pronouncements and their effects on the Company, see “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 2 of the Company’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2024.

Previous wording

Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. Effective internal controls also are a deterrent to fraud. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), the Company is required to include in its Annual Reports on Form 10-K management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, its reputation and operating results would be harmed. As part of its ongoing monitoring of internal controls, the Company may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in its internal controls that require remediation. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Current wording

Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary for the Company to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company. Effective internal controls also are a deterrent to fraud. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), the Company is required to include in its Annual Reports on Form 10-K management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting. If the Company cannot provide reliable financial reports or reasonably prevent fraud, its reputation and operating results would be harmed. As part of its ongoing monitoring of internal controls, the Company may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in its internal controls that require remediation. A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal controls over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The Company has experienced material weaknesses in the past, and there can be no absolute assurances that future material weaknesses will not arise.

Previous wording

In addition, financial challenges at other banking institutions could lead to depositor concerns that spread within the banking industry. In March 2023, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank experienced large deposit outflows coupled with insufficient liquidity to meet withdrawal demands, resulting in the institutions being placed into FDIC receiverships. In the aftermath, there was substantial market disruption and concern that diminished depositor confidence could spread across the banking industry, leading to deposit outflows that could destabilize other institutions. While public confidence in the banking system has stabilized, deposit outflows caused by reputational concerns or events affecting the banking industry generally could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

In addition, financial challenges at other banking institutions could lead to depositor concerns that spread within the banking industry. In 2023 and 2024, several large regional banks experienced large deposit outflows coupled with insufficient liquidity to meet withdrawal demands, resulting in the institutions being placed into FDIC receivership. In the aftermath, there was substantial market disruption and concern that diminished depositor confidence could spread across the banking industry, leading to deposit outflows that could destabilize other institutions. While public confidence in the banking system has stabilized, deposit outflows caused by reputational concerns or events affecting the banking industry generally could adversely affect the Company’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

The Company is subject to a variety of operational risks, including reputational risk, legal and compliance risk, and the risk of fraud or theft by employees, directors, or outsiders.

Current wording

The Company is subject to a variety of operational risks, including reputational, legal, and compliance risk, and the risk of fraud or theft by employees, directors, or outsiders.

Previous wording

The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputational risk, legal and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees, directors or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees, operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or communications systems.

Current wording

The Company is exposed to many types of operational risks, including reputational, legal, and compliance risk, the risk of fraud or theft by employees, directors or outsiders, unauthorized transactions by employees, operational errors, clerical or record-keeping errors, and errors resulting from faulty or disabled computer or communications systems.

Previous wording

The current and anticipated effects of climate change are creating an increasing level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies have continued to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. The federal banking agencies, including the OCC, have emphasized that climate-related risks are faced by banking organizations of all types and sizes and are in the process of enhancing supervisory expectations regarding banks’ risk management practices. In December 2021, the OCC published proposed principles for climate risk management by banking organizations with more than $100 billion in assets. The OCC also has appointed its first ever Climate Change Risk Officer and established an internal climate risk implementation committee in order to assist with these initiatives and to support the agency’s efforts to enhance its supervision of climate change risk management. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. To the extent that these initiatives lead to the promulgation of new regulations or supervisory guidance applicable to the Company, the Company would likely experience increased compliance costs and other compliance-related risks.

Current wording

The current and anticipated effects of climate change are creating an increasing level of concern for the state of the global environment. As a result, political and social attention to the issue of climate change has increased. Federal and state legislatures and regulatory agencies have continued to propose and advance numerous legislative and regulatory initiatives seeking to mitigate the effects of climate change. The federal banking agencies, including the OCC, have emphasized that climate-related risks are faced by banking organizations of all types and sizes and are in the process of enhancing supervisory expectations regarding banks’ risk management practices. In October 2023, the OCC published principles for climate risk management by banking organizations with more than $100 billion in assets. The OCC also has appointed its first ever Climate Change Risk Officer and established an internal climate risk implementation committee in order to assist with these initiatives and to support the agency’s efforts to enhance its supervision of climate change risk management. Similar and even more expansive initiatives are expected, including potentially increasing supervisory expectations with respect to banks’ risk management practices, accounting for the effects of climate change in stress testing scenarios and systemic risk assessments, revising expectations for credit portfolio concentrations based on climate-related factors and encouraging investment by banks in climate-related initiatives and lending to communities disproportionately impacted by the effects of climate change. To the extent that these initiatives lead to the promulgation of new regulations or supervisory guidance applicable to the Company, the Company would likely experience increased compliance costs and other compliance-related risks.

Previous wording

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company’s profits. It is expected that the Company will continue to realize income from the differential or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. In addition, loan volume and yields are affected by market interest rates on loans, and there is substantial competition for new loan originations from qualified borrowers. The Company’s management cannot ensure that it can minimize interest rate risk. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, the Company’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates could materially and adversely affect the net interest spread, asset quality, loan origination volume, and the Company’s overall profitability. The Federal Reserve increased the target federal funds rate by 425 basis points during 2022 to a range of 425 to 450 basis points as of December 31, 2022 and by another 100 basis points during 2023 to a range of 525 to 550 basis points at December 31, 2023.

Current wording

Changes in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company’s profits. It is expected that the Company will continue to realize income from the differential or “spread” between the interest earned on loans, securities, and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits, borrowings, and other interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest spreads are affected by the difference between the maturities and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Loan and deposit volumes, yields, and costs are affected by market interest rates on these products, and there is substantial competition for loans and deposits that affect rates on these products. Additionally, short-term rates are driven by actions of the Federal Reserve, and movements in such rates may have a significant effect on the Company's interest rate risk. The Company’s management cannot ensure that it can minimize interest rate risk. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans and other investments, the Company’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings. Further, shifts in the Company’s mix of interest-earning assets or interest-bearing liabilities could adversely affect yields on assets or costs of funds, respectively. For example, the Company’s costs of funds increased in recent years as the Federal Reserve increased the federal funds rate, which affected rates paid on fintech-related deposits, and as the Company utilized higher levels of time deposits and brokered deposits to help manage liquidity as it exited its fintech deposit operations. Accordingly, changes in levels of market interest rates or management thereof could materially and adversely affect the net interest spread, loan and deposit volumes, and the Company’s overall profitability.

Previous wording

The Company’s business is directly impacted by economic conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, and inflation, all of which are beyond its control. Although the domestic and global economies have largely recovered from the COVID-19 pandemic, certain consequences of the pandemic continue to impact the macroeconomic environment and may persist for some time. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic could have long-lasting impacts on certain industries due to changes in consumer behavior and business practices, including remote work and business travel. Further, the growth in economic activity and in the demand for goods and services, coupled with labor shortages, supply chain disruptions and other factors, has contributed to rising inflationary pressures, the Federal Reserve’s responsive interest rate hikes, and the risk of recession. A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national, or local concerns, especially within the Company’s market area, could result in, among other consequences, an increase in loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures, a decline in demand for the Company’s products and services, a decrease in low cost or non-interest bearing deposits, and/or a deterioration in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate loans, any of which could result in losses that materially and adversely affect the Company’s business.

Current wording

The Company’s business is directly impacted by economic conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, changes in government monetary and fiscal policies, changes in consumer behavior and business practices, and inflation, all of which are beyond its control. The growth in economic activity and in the demand for goods and services, coupled with labor shortages, supply chain disruptions and other factors, has contributed to rising inflationary pressures, the Federal Reserve’s responsive interest rate hikes during 2022 and 2023, and the risk of recession. A deterioration in economic conditions, whether caused by global, national, or local concerns, especially within the Company’s market area, could result in, among other consequences, an increase in loan delinquencies, problem assets and foreclosures, a decline in demand for the Company’s products and services, a decrease in low cost or non-interest bearing deposits, and/or a deterioration in the value of collateral for loans, especially real estate loans, any of which could result in losses that materially and adversely affect the Company’s business.

Previous wording

The Company’s investment securities portfolio, in particular, may be impacted by market conditions beyond its control, including rating agency downgrades of the securities, defaults of the issuers of the securities, lack of market pricing of the securities, inactivity or instability in the credit markets, and changes in market interest rates. For example, the Company carries its available for sale securities portfolio at estimated fair market value. As a result of rising interest rates during 2022 and 2023, the unrealized losses in the Company’s investment securities portfolio increased dramatically and thereby negatively impacted the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income. These unrealized losses (net of income taxes) were approximately $45.1 million at both December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 compared to $3.6 million as of December 31, 2021. Such losses could be realized into earnings should liquidity needs and/or business strategy necessitate the sales of securities in a loss position, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, capital ratios, and results of operations.

Current wording

The Company’s investment securities portfolio, in particular, may be impacted by market conditions beyond its control, including rating agency downgrades of the securities, defaults of the issuers of the securities, lack of market pricing of the securities, inactivity or instability in the credit markets, and changes in market interest rates. For example, the Company carries its available for sale securities portfolio at estimated fair market value. As a result of rising interest rates during 2022 and 2023, the unrealized losses in the Company’s investment securities portfolio increased dramatically and thereby negatively impacted the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income. These unrealized losses (net of income taxes) were approximately $42.5 million as of December 31, 2024 compared to $45.1 million as of December 31, 2023. Such losses could be realized into earnings should liquidity needs and/or business strategy necessitate the sales of securities in a loss position, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition, capital ratios, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Residential mortgage banking income, including mortgage service rights, represented approximately 35.0% of total noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2023. The success of the Company’s mortgage division is dependent upon its ability to originate loans and sell them to investors. Mortgage loan production levels are highly sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates and changes in economic conditions. Revenues from mortgage banking generally are favorably impacted by decreasing interest rates and a low interest rate environment that creates the potential for mortgage loan refinancing activity. Conversely, revenues are adversely affected by rising interest rates, home affordability and inventory, increases in competitive pressures, and changing incentives for homeownership. During 2022 and 2023, revenues from mortgage banking have decreased significantly, primarily due to lower mortgage volumes as demand declined as market interest rates increased significantly during that time. Loan production levels may continue to suffer if there is a sustained slowdown in the housing markets in which the Company conducts business or tightening credit conditions. Any sustained period of decreased activity caused by an economic downturn, fewer refinancing transactions, higher interest rates, housing price pressure, or loan underwriting restrictions would adversely affect the Company’s mortgage originations and, consequently, could significantly reduce its income from mortgage banking activities. As a result, these conditions would also adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

Current wording

Residential mortgage banking income, including mortgage service rights, represented approximately 81.2% of total noninterest income for the year ended December 31, 2024. The success of the Company’s mortgage division is dependent upon its ability to originate loans and sell them to investors. Mortgage loan production levels are highly sensitive to changes in the level of interest rates and changes in economic conditions. Revenues from mortgage banking generally are favorably impacted by decreasing interest rates and a low interest rate environment that creates the potential for mortgage loan refinancing and purchasing activity. Conversely, revenues are adversely affected by rising interest rates, home affordability and inventory, increases in competitive pressures, and changing incentives for homeownership. During 2023 and 2024, revenues from mortgage banking have decreased significantly compared to prior years, primarily due to lower mortgage volumes as demand declined as market interest rates remained elevated during that time. Loan production levels may continue to suffer if there is a sustained slowdown in the housing markets in which the Company conducts business or tightening credit conditions. Any sustained period of decreased activity caused by an economic downturn, fewer refinancing transactions, higher interest rates, housing price pressure, or loan underwriting restrictions would adversely affect the Company’s mortgage originations and, consequently, could significantly reduce its income from mortgage banking activities. As a result, these conditions would also adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

Previous wording

The Company is affected by domestic monetary policy. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States, and its policies determine in large part the Company’s cost of funds for lending, investing, and capital raising activities and the return it earns on those loans and investments, both of which affect the Company’s net interest margin. The actions of the Federal Reserve also can materially affect the value of financial instruments that the Company holds, such as loans and debt securities, and also can affect the Company’s borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. The Federal Reserve increased the target federal funds rate by 425 basis points during 2022 to a range of 425 to 450 basis points as of December 31, 2022 and by another 100 basis points during 2023 to a range of 525 to 550 basis points at December 31, 2023. The Company’s business and earnings also are affected by the fiscal or other policies that are adopted by various regulatory authorities of the United States. Changes in fiscal or monetary policy are beyond the Company’s control and hard to predict.

Current wording

The Company is affected by domestic monetary policy. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States, and its policies determine in large part the Company’s cost of funds for lending, investing, and capital raising activities and the return it earns on those loans and investments, both of which affect the Company’s net interest margin. The actions of the Federal Reserve also can materially affect the value of financial instruments that the Company holds, such as loans and debt securities, and also can affect the Company’s borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. The Federal Reserve increased the target federal funds rate by 100 basis points during 2023 to a range of 525 to 550 basis points as of December 31, 2023, and then decreased by 100 basis points during 2024 to a range of 425 to 450 basis points at December 31, 2024. The Company’s business and earnings also are affected by the fiscal or other policies that are adopted by various regulatory authorities of the United States. Changes in fiscal or monetary policy are beyond the Company’s control and hard to predict.

Previous wording

In addition, thinly-traded stocks can be more volatile than more widely traded stocks. Several factors could cause the price of the Company's stock to fluctuate substantially. These factors include, but are not limited to, analysts’ recommendations or projections, developments related to the Company’s business and operations, stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, news reports of trends, concerns, and irrational exuberance on the part of investors, geopolitical uncertainty, and other issues related to the financial services industry, in general. The Company’s stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to its performance and are not within the control of the Company. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector of the economy, could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Current wording

In addition, thinly-traded stocks can be more volatile than more widely traded stocks. Several factors could cause the price of the Company's stock to fluctuate substantially. These factors include, but are not limited to, developments related to the Company’s business and operations, stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, news reports of trends, concerns, and irrational exuberance on the part of investors, geopolitical uncertainty, and other issues related to the financial services industry, in general. The Company’s stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to its performance and are not within the control of the Company. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector of the economy, could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Previous wording

The level of the ACL reflects management’s evaluation of relevant information about past events, including historical credit loss experience on financial assets with similar risk characteristics, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the remaining cash flows over the contractual term of the financial assets. The determination of the appropriate level of the ACL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Although the Company believes the ACL is a reasonable estimate of lifetime credit losses associated with the loan portfolio, it cannot precisely predict such losses or be certain that the ACL will be adequate in the future. Deterioration of economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside the Company’s control, may require an increase in the ACL. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review its ACL and may, on occasion, require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on their judgment of the facts at the time of their review that may differ than that of management. Further, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the ACL, the Company will need additional provisions to increase the ACL.

Current wording

The level of the ACL reflects management’s evaluation of relevant information about past events, including historical credit loss experience on financial assets with similar risk characteristics, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the remaining cash flows over the contractual term of the financial assets. The determination of the appropriate level of the ACL inherently involves a high degree of subjectivity and requires the Company to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material changes. Although the Company believes the ACL is a reasonable estimate of lifetime credit losses associated with the loan portfolio, it cannot precisely predict such losses or be certain that the ACL will be adequate in the future. Deterioration of economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside the Company’s control, may require an increase in the ACL. In addition, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the ACL and may, on occasion, require an increase in the provision for credit losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on their judgment of the facts at the time of their review that may differ than that of management. Further, if charge-offs in future periods exceed the ACL, the Company will need additional provisions to increase the ACL.

Previous wording

The Company’s nonperforming assets adversely affect its net income in various ways. Nonperforming assets, which include nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest, were $63.1 million, or 2.02% of total assets, as of December 31, 2023. When the Company receives collateral through foreclosures and similar proceedings, it is required to record the related loan to the then fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, which may result in a loss. An increased level of nonperforming assets also increases the Company’s risk profile and may impact the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of such risks. The Company utilizes various techniques such as workouts, restructurings, and loan sales to manage problem assets. Increases in, or negative changes in, the value of these problem assets, the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers’ performance or financial condition, could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and staff, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities, including generation of new loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will avoid increases in nonperforming assets in the future.

Current wording

The Company’s nonperforming assets adversely affect its net income in various ways. Nonperforming assets, which include nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 days and still accruing interest, and other real estate owned ("OREO") were $25.7 million, or 0.94% of total assets, and $63.1 million, or 2.02% of total assets, as of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, respectively. When the Company receives collateral through foreclosures and similar proceedings, it is required to record the related loan to the then fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, which may result in a loss. An increased level of nonperforming assets also increases the Company’s risk profile and may impact the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of such risks. The Company utilizes various techniques such as workouts, restructurings, and loan sales to manage problem assets. Increases in, or negative changes in, the value of these problem assets, the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers’ performance or financial condition, could adversely affect the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and staff, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities, including generation of new loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will avoid increases in nonperforming assets in the future.

Previous wording

The Company offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. Credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers who, as a group, may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. As of December 31, 2023, approximately 76.6% of the Company’s loans were secured by real estate, both residential and commercial, substantially all of which are located in its market area. A major change in the region’s real estate market, resulting in a deterioration in real estate values, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect the Company’s customers’ ability to pay these loans, which in turn could adversely impact the Company. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are inherent in the banking industry, and the Company tries to limit its exposure to this risk by carefully underwriting and monitoring its extensions of credit. The Company cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result, losses may occur in the future.

Current wording

The Company offers a variety of secured loans, including commercial lines of credit, commercial term loans, real estate, construction, home equity, consumer and other loans. Credit risk and credit losses can increase if its loans are concentrated to borrowers who, as a group, may be uniquely or disproportionately affected by economic or market conditions. As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, approximately 80.8% and 76.4%, respectively, of the Company’s loans were secured by real estate, both residential and commercial, substantially all of which are located in its market area. A major change in the region’s real estate market, resulting in a deterioration in real estate values, or in the local or national economy, could adversely affect the Company’s customers’ ability to pay these loans, which in turn could adversely impact the Company. Risk of loan defaults and foreclosures are inherent in the banking industry, and the Company tries to limit its exposure to this risk by carefully underwriting and monitoring its extensions of credit. The Company cannot fully eliminate credit risk, and as a result, losses may occur in the future.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $870.5 million in loans secured by commercial real estate, representing approximately 35.8% of total loans outstanding at that date. The real estate consists primarily of non-owner-occupied properties and other commercial properties. These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential and owner-occupied real estate loans. They are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property to service the debt. It may be more difficult for commercial real estate borrowers to repay their loans in a timely manner, as commercial real estate borrowers ability to repay their loans frequently depends on the successful rental of their properties. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $71.8 million of non-owner occupied office loans, representing approximately 3.0% of total loans outstanding at that date. Cash flows to service commercial real estate loans may be negatively affected by general economic conditions, such as a sustained downturn, or in occupancy rates in the local economy where the property is located and could increase the likelihood of default. Further, when fixed rate loans originated in a time of lower interest rates near their maturity dates, a higher interest rate environment could make it more difficult for borrowers to refinance or extend their loans with the Company due to higher debt service costs. Because the Company’s loan portfolio contains a number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in its percentage of nonperforming loans. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for credit losses, and an increase in charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, the Company had approximately $847.8 million and $870.5 million in loans secured by commercial real estate, respectively, representing approximately 40.2% and 35.8% of total loans outstanding as of those same dates, respectively. The real estate consists primarily of non-owner occupied properties and other commercial properties. These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential and owner-occupied real estate loans. They are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans and depend on cash flows from the owner’s business or the property to service the debt. It may be more difficult for commercial real estate borrowers to repay their loans in a timely manner, as commercial real estate borrowers' ability to repay their loans frequently depends on the successful rental of their properties. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had approximately $73.9 million of non-owner occupied office loans, representing approximately 8.7% of total loans outstanding at that date. Cash flows to service commercial real estate loans may be negatively affected by general economic conditions, such as a sustained downturn, or in occupancy rates in the local economy where the property is located and could increase the likelihood of default. Further, when fixed rate loans originated in a time of lower interest rates near their maturity dates, a higher interest rate environment could make it more difficult for borrowers to refinance or extend their loans with the Company due to higher debt service costs. Because the Company’s loan portfolio contains a number of commercial real estate loans with relatively large balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in nonperforming loans. An increase in nonperforming loans could result in a loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for credit losses, and an increase in charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

The Company’s banking regulators generally give commercial real estate lending greater scrutiny and may require banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans to implement improved underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies, and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of ACL and regulatory capital, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Current wording

The Company’s banking regulators generally give commercial real estate lending greater scrutiny and may require that banks with higher levels of commercial real estate loans implement improved underwriting, internal controls, risk management policies, and portfolio stress testing, as well as possibly higher levels of ACL and regulatory capital, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Previous wording

At December 31, 2023, approximately 10.5% of the Company’s loan portfolio, or $255.9 million, consisted of construction and land development loans. Construction financing typically involves a higher degree of credit risk than financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate and improved, income producing real estate. Risk of loss on a construction or land development loan is largely dependent upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development, the marketability of the property, and the bid price and estimated cost (including interest) of construction or development. If the estimate of construction or development costs proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of the value proves to be inaccurate, it may be confronted, at or prior to the maturity of the loan, with a project whose value is insufficient to assure full repayment. When lending to builders and developers, the cost breakdown of construction or development is provided by the builder or developer. Although the Company’s underwriting criteria are designed to evaluate and minimize the risks of each construction or land development loan, there can be no guarantee that these practices will have safeguarded against material delinquencies and losses to the Company’s operations. In addition, construction and land development loans are dependent on the successful completion of the projects they finance. Loans secured by vacant or unimproved land are generally riskier than loans secured by improved property. These loans are more susceptible to adverse conditions in the real estate market and local economy.

Current wording

At December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023, approximately 7.8% and 10.5% of the Company’s loan portfolio, or $166.3 million and $255.9 million, respectively, consisted of construction and land development loans. Construction financing typically involves a higher degree of credit risk than financing on improved, owner-occupied real estate and improved, income producing real estate. Risk of loss on a construction or land development loan is largely dependent upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development, the marketability of the property, and the bid price and estimated cost (including interest) of construction or development. If the estimate of construction or development costs proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the project. If the estimate of the value proves to be inaccurate, it may be confronted, at or prior to the maturity of the loan, with a project whose value is insufficient to assure full repayment. When lending to builders and developers, the cost breakdown of construction or development is provided by the builder or developer. Although the Company’s underwriting criteria are designed to evaluate and minimize the risks of each construction or land development loan, there can be no guarantee that these practices will have safeguarded against material delinquencies and losses to the Company’s operations. In addition, construction and land development loans are dependent on the successful completion of the projects they finance. Loans secured by vacant or unimproved land are generally riskier than loans secured by improved property. These loans are more susceptible to adverse conditions in the real estate market and local economy.

Previous wording

As indicated above, a significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate and it also holds a portfolio of foreclosed properties. The Company relies upon independent appraisers to estimate the value of such real estate. Appraisals are only estimates of value and the independent appraisers may make mistakes of fact or judgment that adversely affect the reliability of their appraisals. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to increase or decrease. As a result of any of these factors, the real estate securing some of the Company’s loans and the foreclosed properties held by the Company may be more or less valuable than anticipated. If a default occurs on a loan secured by real estate that is less valuable than originally estimated, the Company may not be able to recover the outstanding balance of the loan. It may also be unable to sell its foreclosed properties for the values estimated by their appraisals.

Current wording

As indicated above, a significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio consists of loans secured by real estate and it may hold a portfolio of foreclosed properties. The Company relies upon independent appraisers to estimate the value of such real estate. Appraisals are only estimates of value and the independent appraisers may make mistakes of fact or judgment that adversely affect the reliability of their appraisals. In addition, events occurring after the initial appraisal may cause the value of the real estate to increase or decrease. As a result of any of these factors, the real estate securing some of the Company’s loans and the foreclosed properties held by the Company may be more or less valuable than anticipated. If a default occurs on a loan secured by real estate that is less valuable than originally estimated, the Company may not be able to recover the outstanding balance of the loan. It may also be unable to sell its foreclosed properties for the values estimated by their appraisals.

Previous wording

In the course of its business, the Company may foreclose and take title to real estate, potentially becoming subject to environmental liabilities associated with such properties. The Company may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation, and clean-up costs, or the Company may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a property. Costs associated with investigation or remediation activities can be substantial. If the Company is the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, it may be subject to common law claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. These costs and claims could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

Current wording

In the course of its business, the Company may foreclose and take title to real estate, potentially becoming subject to environmental liabilities associated with such properties. The Company may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for property damage, personal injury, investigation, and clean-up costs, or the Company may be required to investigate or clean up hazardous or toxic substances or chemical releases at a property. Costs associated with investigation or remediation activities can be substantial. If the Company is the owner or former owner of a contaminated site, it may be subject to claims by third parties based on damages and costs resulting from environmental contamination emanating from the property. These costs and claims could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.

Previous wording

A key aspect of the Company’s long-term business strategy is its continued growth. The Company may not be able to successfully continue its growth if it is unable to identify attractive markets, locations, or opportunities to expand in the future, or if the Company is subject to prolonged regulatory restrictions prohibiting growth or expansion of its operations. The Company’s ability to manage its growth successfully also will depend on whether it can maintain capital levels adequate to support its business, maintain operational and control systems, cost controls and asset quality, comply with regulatory requirements, and successfully integrate any businesses the Company pursues into its organization. See “Regulatory capital standards require the Company and the Bank to maintain higher levels of capital, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations” for additional factors that could affect the Company’s long-term growth.

Current wording

A key aspect of the Company’s long-term business strategy is growth. However, in the near term, the Company’s strategic initiatives include repositioning its balance sheet to align with its return to a community-focused bank and positioning itself for measured growth. The Company may not be able to successfully grow in the long-term if it is unable to execute on these initiatives or identify attractive markets, locations, or opportunities to expand in the future, or if the Company is subject to prolonged regulatory restrictions prohibiting growth or expansion of its operations. The Company’s ability to manage its growth successfully also will depend on whether it can maintain capital levels adequate to support its business, maintain operational and control systems, cost controls and asset quality, comply with regulatory requirements, and successfully integrate any businesses the Company pursues into its organization. See “Regulatory capital standards require the Company and the Bank to maintain higher levels of capital, which could adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations” for additional factors that could affect the Company’s long-term growth.

Previous wording

Deposit levels and other funding costs may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, rates paid by competitors, general interest rate levels, regulatory capital requirements, returns available to customers on alternative investments, and general economic conditions. If market interest rates rise or the Company’s competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, the Company’s funding costs may increase, either because the Company raises its rates to avoid losing deposits or because the Company must rely on more expensive sources of funding. Much of the Company’s recent deposit growth has been concentrated in its fintech operations, which can be relatively high-cost and rate-sensitive. Fintech-related deposits accounted for approximately $465.9 million, or 18.2%, of the Company’s deposits as of December 31, 2023. Brokered deposits accounted for approximately $515.5 million, or 20.1%, of the Company’s deposits as of December 31, 2023. The Company’s cost of funds increased to 2.56% in 2023 compared to 0.68% in 2022. If funding costs continue to rise in future periods, as a result of reliance on higher-cost deposits, further increases in market interest rates, rates paid by competitors, or otherwise, it could reduce the Company’s net interest margin and net interest income and could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows from operations.

Current wording

Deposit levels and other funding costs may be affected by a number of factors, including, but not limited to, rates paid by competitors, general interest rate levels, regulatory capital requirements, returns available to customers on alternative investments, and general economic conditions. If market interest rates rise or the Company’s competitors raise the rates they pay on deposits, the Company’s funding costs may increase, either because the Company raises its rates to avoid losing deposits or because the Company must rely on more expensive sources of funding. During 2024, the Company completed the winddown of its fintech BaaS deposit operations and, as of December 31, 2024, had $21.3 million of fintech-related deposits compared to $465.9 million as of December 31, 2023. The Company has offered higher cost deposits and brokered deposits to help manage liquidity as it exited its fintech deposit operations. Brokered deposits accounted for approximately $402.5 million, or 18.5%, of the Company’s deposits as of December 31, 2024. The Company’s cost of funds increased to 3.04% in 2024 compared to 2.56% in 2023. If funding costs continue to rise in future periods, as a result of reliance on higher cost deposits, further increases in market interest rates, rates paid by competitors, or otherwise, it could reduce the Company’s net interest income and could have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows from operations.

Previous wording

Pursuant to the Consent Order, the Bank may not be deemed to be “well capitalized” while subject to the Consent Order, which restricts it from soliciting, accepting, renewing, or rolling over any brokered deposits except in compliance with certain applicable restrictions under federal law.

Current wording

While subject to the Consent Order, the Bank may not be deemed to be “well capitalized,” which restricts it from accepting, renewing, or rolling over brokered deposits except in compliance with certain applicable restrictions under federal law. During the third quarter of 2024, the Bank received approval from the FDIC allowing it to accept, renew, and rollover brokered deposits. In the fourth quarter of 2024, the Bank received an extension of this approval. Each approval was for a six-month period and in the amount of maturities during this period. The Company expects to continue to seek waivers of this prohibition in the future; however, there is no assurance that such waivers will be approved or that the Company will be able to rely on brokered deposits as a source of funding in the future.

Previous wording

If customer deposits are not sufficient to fund the Company’s normal operations and liquidity needs, the Company may be required from time to time to rely on secondary sources of liquidity to meet withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations. Such sources historically have included Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) advances, sales of securities and loans, and federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks, as well as additional out-of-market time deposits and brokered deposits. The Company’s ability to access borrowings from the FHLB is dependent upon providing collateral to secure FHLB borrowings. While the Company believes its funding sources are currently adequate, there can be no assurance they will be sufficient to meet future liquidity demands, particularly if the Company experiences increasing loan demand or is unable to maintain or grow its deposit base. Further, there can be no assurance that these arrangements will be available to the Company when needed, on favorable terms, or at all, or that they will be sufficient to meet future liquidity needs. The Company may be required, among other things, to slow or discontinue loan growth, capital expenditures or other investments, or liquidate assets. If the Company is unable to access funding sufficient to support its business operations or is unable to access such funding on attractive terms, it may not be able to satisfy its obligations.

Current wording

If customer deposits are not sufficient to fund the Company’s normal operations and liquidity needs, the Company may be required from time to time to rely on secondary sources of liquidity to meet withdrawal demands or otherwise fund operations. Such sources historically have included Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) advances, sales of securities and loans, and federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banks, as well as additional out-of-market time deposits and brokered deposits. The Company’s ability to access borrowings from the FHLB and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond ("FRB") is dependent upon providing collateral to secure borrowings. While the Company believes its funding sources are currently adequate, there can be no assurance they will be sufficient to meet future liquidity demands, particularly if the Company experiences increasing loan demand or is unable to maintain or grow its deposit base. Further, there can be no assurance that these arrangements will be available to the Company when needed, on favorable terms, or at all, or that they will be sufficient to meet future liquidity needs. The Company may be required, among other things, to slow or discontinue loan growth, capital expenditures or other investments, or liquidate assets. If the Company is unable to access funding sufficient to support its business operations or is unable to access such funding on attractive terms, it may not be able to satisfy its obligations.

Previous wording

The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that the Company and the Bank must maintain. From time to time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Company or the Bank fails to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/or other regulatory requirements, its financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations, which could adversely affect the Company's profitability and return on equity. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDI Act.

Current wording

The Company is subject to capital adequacy guidelines and other regulatory requirements specifying minimum amounts and types of capital that the Company and the Bank must maintain. From time to time, regulators implement changes to these regulatory capital adequacy guidelines. If the Company or the Bank fail to meet these minimum capital guidelines and/or other regulatory requirements, its financial condition would be materially and adversely affected. The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations, which could adversely affect the Company's profitability and return on equity. The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the FDI Act.

Previous wording

In addition to the foregoing capital requirements, the Consent Order requires the Bank to maintain a leverage ratio of 10.00% and a total capital ratio of 13.00%. As a result, the Bank may not be deemed to be “well capitalized” for purposes of the bank regulatory framework for prompt corrective action while subject to the Consent Order. If the Bank fails to achieve and maintain such capital ratios, the OCC may, in the future, deem the Bank to be “undercapitalized” under such regulatory provisions. As of December 31, 2023, the Bank did not meet these heightened capital requirements.

Current wording

In addition to the foregoing capital requirements, the Consent Order requires the Bank to maintain a leverage ratio of 10.00% and a total capital ratio of 13.00%. As a result, the Bank may not be deemed to be “well capitalized” for purposes of the bank regulatory framework for prompt corrective action while subject to the Consent Order. If the Bank fails to achieve and maintain such capital ratios, the OCC may, in the future, deem the Bank to be “undercapitalized” under such regulatory provisions. As of December 31, 2024, the Bank met these heightened capital requirements.

Previous wording

Satisfying these capital and IMCR requirements also may require the Bank to limit its banking operations and/or require the Company to raise additional capital in the future to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.

Current wording

Satisfying these capital requirements also may require the Bank to limit its banking operations and/or require the Company to raise additional capital in the future to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect the business, financial condition, and results of operations of the Company and the value of its common stock.

Previous wording

Future issuances of the Company’s securities could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could be dilutive.

Current wording

Future issuances of the Company’s securities, including upon the exercise of the warrants issued by the Company, could adversely affect the market price of the common stock and could be dilutive.

Previous wording

The Company’s board of directors, without the approval of shareholders, could from time to time decide to issue additional shares of common stock or shares of preferred stock, which may adversely affect the market price of the shares of common stock and could be substantially dilutive to the Company’s shareholders. Any sale of additional shares of the Company’s common stock may be at prices lower than the current market value of the Company’s shares. In addition, new investors may have rights, preferences, and privileges that are senior to, and that could adversely affect, the Company’s existing shareholders. For example, preferred stock would be senior to common stock in right of dividends and as to distributions in liquidation. The Company’s shareholders bear the risk of future securities offerings diluting their stock holdings, adversely affecting their rights as shareholders, and/or reducing the market price of the Company’s common stock.

Current wording

In addition, the Company’s board of directors, without the approval of shareholders, could from time to time decide to issue additional shares of common stock or shares of preferred stock, which may adversely affect the market price of the shares of common stock and could be substantially dilutive to holders of the Company’s common stock. Any sale of additional shares of the Company’s common stock may be at prices lower than the current market value of the Company’s common stock. In addition, new investors may have rights, preferences, and privileges that are senior to, and that could adversely affect, the Company’s existing shareholders. For example, preferred stock would be senior to common stock in right of dividends and as to distributions in liquidation. The Company’s shareholders bear the risk of future securities offerings diluting their stock holdings, adversely affecting their rights as shareholders, and/or reducing the market price of the Company’s common stock.