Sight Sciences Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Mar 7, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Mar 7, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-03-13.
0000950170-24-030278
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-07.
0000950170-25-035500
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 300 previous paragraphs and 309 current paragraphs.
205 unchanged; 85 reworded; 15 added; 7 removed; 3 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (15)
Current report
In June 2023, for instance, five of the seven Medicare Administrative Contractors (“MACs”) published proposed local coverage determinations (the “Prior LCDs”) that identified certain non-implantable MIGS procedures as investigational and not reasonable and necessary in the jurisdictions where these MACs administer Medicare Part B benefits, including adult canaloplasty in combination with trabeculotomy (ab interno), a procedure performed with OMNI and for which it is indicated. The Prior LCDs may also have categorized our SION technology as investigational and thus non-covered with respect to goniotomy procedures. The Prior LCDs were withdrawn in late December 2023 prior to becoming effective, and replaced with updated LCDs (the “Final LCDs”) that became effective in November 2024. The Final LCDs allow for continued coverage of canaloplasty and goniotomy procedures performed with our OMNI and SION technologies in these five MAC jurisdictions. However, each of the Final LCDs adopted a non-coverage policy when an aqueous shunt or stent procedure is performed with another surgical MIGS procedure, such as canaloplasty or goniotomy, at the same time in the same patient eye. We estimate that approximately 15% of total MIGS codes billed in the nine months ended September 30, 2024 were done in combination with another MIGS code and expect the non-coverage determination for multiple MIGS procedures will reduce overall MIGS claims volumes, which may adversely impact our business, revenue and prospects. Moreover, it is possible that one or more MACs will publish new or updated LCDs or other determinations in the future that could characterize procedures associated with our products as non-covered, or as covered under more limited parameters. The publication and effectiveness of any such future determinations would adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Current report
Our ability, and the ability of our licensors, to obtain, maintain, protect and enforce our intellectual property rights;
Current report
Availability of lower-priced competitive products;
Current report
Unwillingness to alter historical practice patterns to incorporate OMNI use in Standalone procedures into their practices;
Current report
ASC and ECP preferences for procedures that may be more profitable than those performed with our products, or for competitive products that are lower priced and thus offer greater profit margins in procedures in which our products are used;
Current report
Internationally, medical reimbursement systems vary significantly from country to country, with some countries limiting medical centers’ spending through fixed budgets, regardless of levels of patient treatment, and other countries requiring application for, and approval of, government or third-party reimbursement. For example, in the third quarter of 2024, certain reimbursement advice published by the United Kingdom’s National Health Service has rendered untenable the code that had previously been relied upon as applicable to procedures performed with our OMNI technology. This shift has resulted in reduced reimbursement for OMNI procedures as compared to historic reimbursement levels, which in turn could materially affect our business, results of operations and prospects in the United Kingdom.
Current report
In addition, each of the Final LCDs adopted a non-coverage policy when an aqueous shunt or stent procedure is performed with another surgical MIGS procedure, such as canaloplasty or goniotomy, at the same time in the same patient eye. We estimate that approximately 15% of total MIGS codes billed in the nine months ended September 30, 2024 were done in combination with another MIGS code and expect the non-coverage determination for multiple MIGS procedures will reduce overall MIGS claims volumes, which may adversely impact our business, revenue and prospects. If we are not successful in reversing any proposed non-coverage policies, or if third-party payors that currently cover or reimburse procedures in which our products are used reverse or limit their coverage in the future, or if other third-party payors issue similar policies, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Moreover, any uncertainty with respect to coverage or coding may impact management’s ability to accurately forecast results.
Current report
Though in the past we have viewed such ECP trialing and use of alternative devices as temporary and not material to the continued growth of OMNI sales, we cannot guarantee that OMNI utilization will normalize relative to historical periods or grow in the future pursuant to our strategic initiatives. Sustained increases in ECP use of alternative MIGS devices could result in reduced OMNI sales and revenue growth or even loss of market share, which would adversely impact our competitive position, business and results of operations.
Current report
Our ability to obtain products and components in sufficient quantities from these suppliers may be limited for several reasons, including their financial difficulties, damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities, inability to obtain components, problems with their own suppliers, our relative importance as a customer to each manufacturer. In addition, geopolitical tensions between China and Taiwan or China and the United States could cause geopolitical and economic unrest that could adversely affect our business. Further, the imposition of tariffs by the United States on imported Chinese goods and implementation of retaliatory tariffs by China will increase the cost of our products and product components, and adversely affect our business operations and financial condition. A significant portion of our OMNI and SION products, and certain of our TearCare system components, are produced and assembled by a single Taiwan-based manufacturer in China, and there is currently significant uncertainty about the relationship between the U.S. and China with respect to trade policies, government regulations, and tariffs, and such uncertainty could continue in future periods.
Current report
With respect to tariffs, in February 2025, the United States imposed a 10% tariff on all Chinese imports, which tariff was increased to 20% in early March 2025. This 20% tariff applies to our products and product components imported from China. China has responded with certain retaliatory tariffs on select U.S. agricultural products, natural resources and machinery and has indicated an intent to implement additional retaliatory tariffs. The 20% tariff will have a negative impact on our gross margins for as long as it remains in effect, as the large majority of our products are manufactured on our behalf in China. Any further escalation in the use of retaliatory trade tariffs between the U.S. and China could cause a further significant increase in the cost of our products and the components for our products, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition. To mitigate these risks, we have also contracted with a U.S.-based manufacturer to produce and assemble OMNI products, and have supply arrangements with other suppliers to produce certain TearCare system components; however, at least in the near-term, a large majority of our products will continue to be manufactured in China.
Current report
In March 2025, the United States also imposed 25% tariffs on good imported from Canada and Mexico, and retaliatory tariffs are expected. While the tariffs imposed on Canadian and Mexican goods do not currently materially and adversely affect our supply chain and related costs, the economic disruption that may be caused by these tariffs could adversely affect our business, There is also the risk that new tariffs could be implemented with other U.S. trading partners, including the European Union. Further, these tariff disputes may cause supply chain disruptions and will also likely increase the shipping and other logistical costs involved in importing our products and product components, which would further adversely impact our gross margins.
Current report
We have limited experience in training ECPs on, and marketing and selling, our TearCare products, which could adversely affect customer perceptions and adoption of our TearCare products.
Current report
We have sold our TearCare products on a limited basis since 2019, initially targeting the cash pay market. We do not have experience selling TearCare on a national basis with a large sales force and concerted sales initiatives. Thus, the number of eligible ECPs trained on TearCare remains relatively modest. If we are unable to expand and enhance our training efforts to target and effectively train existing and new ECP customers on our TearCare products, adoption of TearCare will be adversely impacted. Further, we have limited experience with marketing TearCare. Our marketing and sales campaigns have been limited in scope and have continued to evolve as we better understand the needs and preferences and knowledge gaps of our existing and prospective TearCare customers, and as we expand our library of clinical evidence supporting the TearCare procedure’s safety and efficacy, but these efforts may not be successful in driving TearCare adoption.
Current report
Further, in parallel with publication of the positive results of our SAHARA RCT, we have commenced a comprehensive effort to establish sustainable and equitable third-party reimbursement of the TearCare procedure. If we are successful in obtaining favorable payment decisions, whether under or outside of formal coverage policies, we expect that demand for our TearCare products will escalate. Our ability to maintain this demand will depend in part on our ability to timely and effectively train new ECP customers. Further, we do not have experience marketing and selling TearCare for use in procedures that are reimbursed by Medicare and other governmental payers. If we are unable to effectively train our personnel on, and to otherwise comply with, laws, regulations and guidelines applicable to federally reimbursed products, including regulations pertaining to kickbacks, false claims, interactions with ECPs and direct-to-consumer advertising, our business may suffer.
Current report
As the result of certain reimbursement and similar services that we provide to our customers, we may from time to time have access to personal health information, or PHI, as defined under the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their implementing regulations, which we collectively refer to as HIPAA, and related state laws, rules and regulations. As such, we may be deemed to be a “Business Associate” as defined under HIPAA, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights, or OCR, may impose significant penalties on a Business Associate for a failure to comply with an applicable requirement of HIPAA. Penalties may include civil monetary penalties, criminal monetary penalties and imprisonment. The U.S. Department of Justice, or the DOJ, is responsible for criminal prosecutions under HIPAA. State attorneys general also have the right to prosecute HIPAA violations committed against residents of their states. While HIPAA does not create a private right of action that would allow individuals to sue in civil court for HIPAA violations, its standards have been used as the basis for the duty of care in state civil suits, such as those for negligence or recklessness in misusing individuals’ health information. Furthermore, in the event of a breach as defined by HIPAA, the Business Associate may have to comply with specific reporting requirements under HIPAA regulations.
Removed paragraphs (7)
Previous report
In June 2023, five MACs published draft local coverage determinations (the “Draft LCDs”), that identified certain procedures as investigational in patients over the age of 18 for glaucoma management, including canaloplasty in combination with trabeculotomy (ab interno) which is a procedure associated with OMNI. In the fourth quarter of 2023, these Draft LCDs, as amended, were published in final form with a future effective date of January 29, 2024 and then subsequently withdrawn in late December 2023. Had these LCDs not been withdrawn, canaloplasty followed by trabeculotomy (ab interno) would have been rendered non-covered as of January 29, 2024 with respect to Medicare Part B beneficiaries in the states administered by these MACs, which would have materially and adversely impacted our business, revenues and prospects. It is possible that one or more MACs will publish new or updated LCDs or other determinations in the future that could characterize procedures associated with our products as non-covered, or as covered under more limited parameters. The publication and effectiveness of any such future determinations would adversely affect our business and results of operation.
Previous report
Our strategic realignment and cost saving initiatives could result in higher than expected costs, fail to achieve the anticipated cost savings, and cause disruptions in our business that could make it difficult to achieve our strategic objectives.
Previous report
In October 2023, we initiated a strategic realignment of our operations, including approximately a 10% reduction in our workforce, which was intended to reduce operating expenses, improve cost efficiencies, and further extend our cash runway. However, these initiatives may not result in the anticipated benefits, and may result in unexpected difficulties or costs.
Previous report
In addition, we may fail to accurately estimate the level of cost savings and improvements to our cost structure associated with our initiatives, in which case our future operating results may be worse than expected. Further, our workforce reduction may be disruptive to our business and have unanticipated consequences, such as attrition beyond planned staff reductions, reduced employee morale, and decreased operational capabilities primarily within our Dry Eye business. Our workforce reductions could also harm our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, which could adversely affect our business and results of operation. Our strategic initiatives may also have a negative effect on our existing relationships within our Dry Eye business segment, including with respect to business partners, customers, and other constituents. For example, we amended or terminated our contractual relationships with certain partners, which may harm our long-term business relationships with these partners and result in unexpected costs.
Previous report
We have limited experience implementing similar strategic initiatives and, as a result, we may fail to achieve the associated benefits, or fail to anticipate the associated costs or manage any expected difficulties. If we are unable to successfully manage these realignment activities, or any similar activities in the future, our financial performance, results of operations, and prospects could be negatively affected. In addition, the impact of these initiatives could result in variations in our financial results from period to period, which could make comparisons of our financial performance more difficult.
Previous report
The tax regimes to which we are subject or under which we operate are unsettled and may be subject to significant change. The issuance of additional guidance related to existing or future tax laws, or changes to tax laws or regulations proposed or implemented by the current or a future U.S. presidential administration, Congress, or taxing authorities in other jurisdictions, including jurisdictions outside of the United States, could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate. To the extent that such changes have a negative impact on us, including as a result of related uncertainty, these changes may adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Previous report
In connection with the preparation of our financial statements in connection with our IPO, we identified a material weakness in our internal controls due to a lack of sufficient full-time accounting personnel with requisite experience and deep technical accounting knowledge to (i) identify and resolve complex accounting issues under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP, and (ii) enable appropriate segregation of duties and reviews over the financial reviews over the financial close and reporting process.
Reworded paragraphs (85)
Previous wording
We have incurred annual net losses since our formation in 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had net losses of $55.5 million and $86.2 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, we had an accumulated a deficit of $294.8 million. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and from sales of our products. The losses and accumulated deficit have primarily been due to the substantial investments we have made to develop our products, costs related to our sales and marketing efforts, general research and development expenses, including costs related to clinical trials and regulatory initiatives to obtain marketing clearance, and infrastructure improvements. In addition, as a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
Current wording
We have incurred annual net losses since our formation in 2010. For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we had net losses of $51.5 million and $55.5 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2024, we had an accumulated deficit of $346.3 million. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through equity and debt financings and from product sales. Our net losses and accumulated deficit have primarily been due to the substantial investments we have made to develop our products, costs related to our sales and marketing efforts, general research and development expenses, including costs related to clinical trials and regulatory initiatives to obtain marketing clearance, and infrastructure improvements, and costs related to intellectual property development, protection and enforcement. In addition, as a public company, we incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company.
Previous wording
We began selling VISCO360 and TRAB360, commercial predicate devices to OMNI, in 2015, TearCare in 2019 and SION in the second half of 2022, and therefore do not have a long history operating as a commercial company. Currently, we are highly dependent on the success of OMNI and SION, which comprise our current commercial Surgical Glaucoma products, and our TearCare system, and we expect substantially all of our product revenues in at least the next 12 months to be derived from these products. We are particularly dependent on the success of OMNI, which accounted for the large majority of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2023, and which we believe will continue to account for the substantial majority of our revenue going forward. Because we devote substantially all of our resources to these products and rely on them as our sole source of revenue, any factors that negatively impact our products, and particularly OMNI, or result in a decrease in sales, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We began selling VISCO360 and TRAB360, commercial predicate devices to OMNI, in 2015, TearCare in 2019 and SION in 2022, and therefore do not have a long history operating as a commercial company. Currently, we are highly dependent on the success of OMNI. We also derive revenue from sales of SION, our other commercially available Surgical Glaucoma product, and our TearCare system and related accessories, which comprise our commercial Dry Eye products, and we expect substantially all of our revenue in at least the next 12 months to be derived from the sale of these OMNI, SION and TearCare products. We believe OMNI sales will continue to account for the large majority of our revenue over the next few years. In the longer term, our growth strategy is dependent upon achieving adequate and sustainable reimbursement for TearCare to help drive Dry Eye revenue growth. Because we devote substantially all of our resources to developing, marketing and selling these products and rely on the sale of our products as our sole source of revenue, any factors that negatively impact our products, particularly OMNI, or result in a decrease in sales, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Over the next several years, we expect to continue to devote substantial resources to expand our commercialization efforts, drive increased adoption of our products and continue to develop new and improved products. Our limited commercialization experience and number of products make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future prospects. For example, we believe that OMNI can be used as a Standalone Procedure to help effectively reduce IOP in adult POAG patients, but we have limited commercial experience with this Standalone Market Segment, and the extent to which we are able to penetrate and grow this market is unknown. In addition, a number of factors, including some outside of our control, may render our products economically impracticable or obsolete and contribute to fluctuations in our financial results, including:
Current wording
Over the next several years, we expect to continue to devote substantial resources to expand our commercialization efforts, drive increased adoption of our products and continue to develop new and improved products. Our limited commercialization experience and number of products make it difficult to evaluate our current business and predict our future prospects. For example, we believe OMNI procedures can be highly effective in reducing IOP in adult POAG patients when performed as a Standalone Procedure. However, we have limited commercial experience with the Standalone Market Segment, and the extent to which we are able to penetrate and grow this market is unknown. If we and other market participants are unable to effectively drive the use of MIGS devices in Standalone Procedures, then our total addressable market will be significantly reduced, which will adversely affect our sales and growth strategy. In addition, a number of factors, including some outside of our control, may render our products less competitive, economically impracticable or obsolete and contribute to fluctuations in our financial results, including:
Previous wording
Changes in reimbursement rates by government or commercial payors;
Current wording
Changes in reimbursement rates or coverage restrictions instituted by government or commercial payors, such as the coverage limitations on multiple MIGS procedures done at the same time as a cataract surgery included in the Final LCDs;
Previous wording
The results of our clinical trials or investigations, including perceived inadequacy or insufficiency of evidence supporting the clinical benefits or cost-effectiveness of our products;
Current wording
The results of our clinical trials or investigations, including perceived inadequacy or insufficiency of evidence supporting the clinical benefits or cost-effectiveness of our products, and the publication of any long-term clinical data that may suggest or conclude that our products are less safe or effective than initially thought;
Previous wording
Any safety or effectiveness concerns that arise regarding our products for either their currently authorized uses or the uses for which we are developing our products;
Current wording
Safety or effectiveness concerns that arise regarding our products’ currently authorized uses or uses for which we are developing our products;
Previous wording
Unanticipated delays in product development or product launches;
Current wording
Unanticipated delays in product development or launches;
Previous wording
Our ability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all, if needed to support the commercialization of our products;
Current wording
Our ability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms, or at all, to support the commercialization of our products;
Previous wording
Our ability to achieve and maintain compliance with all legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our products;
Current wording
Our ability to achieve and maintain compliance with legal and regulatory requirements applicable to our products;
Previous wording
Our business is dependent upon the broad adoption of our products by eyecare professionals and patients.
Current wording
Our business is dependent upon the broad adoption and continued use of our products by eyecare professionals and patients.
Previous wording
ECPs, including ophthalmologists and optometrists, have limited awareness of, and experience with, our products and brand. Our future growth and profitability largely depend on our ability to increase ECP and patient awareness of our products and on the willingness of ECPs and patients to adopt our products. ECPs may not adopt our products unless they believe they will receive appropriate compensation for such use and are able to determine, based on experience, clinical data, medical society and association recommendations and other analyses, that our products are clinically differentiated from, or otherwise preferable to, available alternatives. Even if we are able to raise awareness among ECPs, they may be slow to change their medical treatment practices and may be hesitant to select our products for a variety of reasons, including:
Current wording
ECPs, including ophthalmologists and optometrists, have limited awareness of, and experience with, our products and brand. Our future growth and profitability largely depend on our ability to increase ECP and patient awareness of our products and their willingness to adopt our products. ECPs may not adopt our products unless they believe they will receive appropriate compensation for such use and are able to determine, based on experience, clinical data, medical society and association recommendations and other analyses, that our products are clinically differentiated from, or otherwise preferable to, available alternatives. Even if we are able to raise awareness among ECPs, they may be slow to change their medical treatment practices and may be hesitant to select our products for a variety of reasons, including:
Previous wording
Lack of adequate, equitable third-party payor coverage or reimbursement, or changes in (or new) third-party payor coverage or reimbursement policies or determinations that are materially adverse to the Company's interest;
Current wording
Lack of adequate, equitable third-party payor coverage or reimbursement, or changes in (or new) third-party payor coverage or reimbursement policies or determinations that adversely affect coverage for procedures involving OMNI;
Previous wording
Lack, or perceived lack, of sufficient clinical evidence, including long-term data, supporting clinical benefits or the cost-effectiveness of our products over existing treatments;
Current wording
Lack, or perceived lack, of sufficient clinical evidence, including with respect to an absence of OMNI randomized controlled trial data, clinical data on long-term outcomes, supporting clinical benefits of our products or the cost-effectiveness of our products over existing treatments;
Previous wording
Competitive activities, including new product introductions and negative selling efforts from providers of alternative treatments;
Current wording
Competitive activities, including new product introductions, pricing tactics, and negative selling efforts from providers of alternative treatments;
Previous wording
To effectively market and sell our products, we will need to continue to educate the medical community about the safety, efficacy, necessity and efficiency of our products and about the patient populations that would potentially benefit from the use of our products. For example, if first-line ECPs or primary care physicians that serve as the early point of contact for patients are not made aware of our OMNI products, they may not refer patients to ECPs who utilize our products, and those patients may be treated with alternative procedures or treatments. In addition, some physicians may choose to utilize our products on only a subset of their total patient population or may not adopt our products at all. Further, if we are unable to obtain or maintain favorable third-party reimbursement coverage of procedures in which our products are used, particularly as compared to competitive products, adoption of our products by ECPs and patients will suffer. We cannot assure you that our products will achieve broad market acceptance among payors, physicians and patients. Any failure of our products to satisfy demand or to achieve meaningful market acceptance and penetration will harm our future prospects and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
In addition, some physicians may choose to utilize our products on only a subset of their total patient population or may not adopt our products at all. Further, if procedures in which our products are used do not receive and maintain favorable third-party reimbursement coverage, particularly as compared to procedures in which competitive products are used, adoption of our products by ECPs and patients will suffer. Similarly, if competitive products are priced significantly lower than our products or are considered to offer greater ease of use than our products, then ECPs may elect to use these competitive products, even if we believe that other considerations such as clinical efficacy favor our products. Also, if ECPs prioritize alternative ophthalmic procedures to the procedures in which our products are currently used, whether for clinical, reimbursement or other reasons, then there will be less available surgical capacity to perform procedures using our products. We cannot assure you that our products will achieve broad market acceptance among payors, physicians and patients. Any failure of our products to satisfy demand or to achieve meaningful market acceptance and penetration will harm our future prospects and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We may not be able to incrementally secure or maintain adequate levels of third-party coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which our Surgical Glaucoma or Dry Eye products are used, and third parties may rescind or modify their coverage or delay payments related to these products, which will adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
We may not be able to secure or maintain adequate levels of third-party coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which our Surgical Glaucoma or Dry Eye products are used, and third parties may rescind or modify their coverage or delay payments related to these products, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
We derive revenue from sales of OMNI and SION to physicians, ASCs, and HOPDs, which typically bill all or a portion of the costs and fees associated with our products to various third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, private commercial insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and other healthcare-related organizations, and then bill patients for any applicable deductibles or co-payments. Internationally, medical reimbursement systems vary significantly from country to country, with some countries limiting medical centers’ spending through fixed budgets, regardless of levels of patient treatment, and other countries requiring application for, and approval of, government or third-party reimbursement. As a result, access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which our Surgical Glaucoma products are used by third-party payors is essential to their acceptance and adoption by patients and ECPs.
Current wording
We derive revenue from sales of OMNI and SION to physicians, ASCs, and HOPDs, which typically bill all or a portion of the costs and fees associated with our products to various third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, foreign governmental payors, private commercial insurance companies, health maintenance organizations and other healthcare-related organizations, and then bill patients for any applicable deductibles or co-payments. Historically, we have sold our TearCare system components to customers on a limited cash-pay basis to drive customer awareness and acceptance in advance of reimbursement. We are pursuing reimbursement coverage for TearCare so ECPs can bill all or a portion of the costs and fees associated with this product to various third-party payors, including Medicare, Medicaid, private commercial insurance companies, health maintenance organizations, and other healthcare-related organizations, and then bill patients for any applicable deductibles or co-payments. ECPs have begun to have individual claims-made reimbursements for these services. As a result, access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which our Surgical Glaucoma and Dry Eye products are used by third-party payors is essential to their broad acceptance and adoption by patients and ECPs.
Previous wording
These third-party payors continually review new and existing technologies for possible coverage and can deny or reverse coverage for new or existing products and procedures, and there can be no assurance that third-party payor policies provide coverage, or will continue to provide coverage, for procedures in which OMNI or our other products are used. For example, CMS, MACs or commercial payors could issue coverage policies that could restrict or eliminate coverage for the patient populations eligible for treatment with our products or that are otherwise unfavorable to our business. In June 2023, for instance, five MACs issued the Draft LCDs, which proposed to establish or update Medicare coverage policies for MIGS. The Draft LCDs proposed to identify certain non-implantable MIGS procedures as investigational and not reasonable and necessary in the jurisdictions where these MACS administer Medicare Part B benefits, including but not limited to adult canaloplasty in combination with trabeculotomy ab interno, a procedure performed with OMNI and for which it is indicated. The Draft LCDs may also have categorized our SION technology as investigational and thus non-covered with respect to goniotomy procedures. The Draft LCDs, as amended, were published as “final” during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2023 before being withdrawn in late December 2023, prior to becoming effective. The states served by these five MACs accounted for approximately 63% of our total Surgical Glaucoma revenue in 2022. Although the Draft LCDs, as amended, were withdrawn prior to becoming effective and thus did not impact the Medicare coverage policies impacting our products, these five MACs, or other MACs, may issue updated or new local coverage determinations or other coverage policies or determinations in the future that may establish a policy of Medicare non-coverage, or materially restricted coverage, for one or more of our products. Any such policies or determinations could in turn influence coverage determinations by other third-party payors. If we are not successful in reversing any proposed non-coverage policies, or if third-party payors that currently cover or reimburse procedures in which our products are used reverse or limit their coverage in the future, or if other third-party payors issue similar policies, it would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
These third-party payors continually review new and existing technologies for possible coverage and can deny or reverse coverage for new or existing products and procedures, and there can be no assurance that third-party payor policies provide coverage, or will continue to provide coverage, for procedures in which OMNI or our other products are used. For example, in the U.S., CMS, MACs or commercial payors could require or issue coverage policies that could restrict or eliminate coverage for the patient populations eligible for treatment with our products or that are otherwise unfavorable to our business. In June 2023, for instance, five MACs published the Prior LCDs, which proposed to identify certain non-implantable MIGS procedures as investigational and not reasonable and necessary in the jurisdictions where these MACS administer Medicare Part B benefits, including but not limited to adult canaloplasty in combination with trabeculotomy ab interno, a procedure performed with OMNI and for which it is indicated. The Prior LCDs may also have categorized our SION technology as investigational and thus non-covered with respect to goniotomy procedures. Although the Prior LCDs were withdrawn in late December 2023 and replaced with the now-effective Final LCDs which allow for continued coverage of standalone canaloplasty and goniotomy procedures performed with our OMNI and SION technologies in these five MAC jurisdictions, in the future, governmental or private payors may issue coverage policies or guidance that may establish non-coverage, materially restrict coverage, or reduce reimbursement levels for one or more procedures involving our products. Any such policies, determinations or guidance could in turn influence coverage determinations by other third-party payors.
Previous wording
We also derive revenue from sales of TearCare to ECPs and eye care clinics, which bill all or a portion of the costs and fees associated with treatments and products to patients or, on a limited basis, to third-party payors. We believe that access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which TearCare is used by third-party payors is important to the broad acceptance and adoption of TearCare. Currently, no MACs have formal policies establishing coverage for the TearCare procedure; however, MACs from time to time may include, and we are currently aware of three MACs that have included, low payment rates for TearCare procedures in their fee schedules that, if not removed or increased to what we believe is an appropriate reimbursement level, could adversely impact our efforts to achieve reimbursement for TearCare that is sufficient to support its broad commercial growth and adoption. Further, commercial payors may from time to time make “no coverage” or similar determinations with respect to our TearCare product that could hamper our efforts to drive broad commercial adoption of TearCare. We are pursuing a comprehensive long-term market development and patient access plan for TearCare and focusing our efforts on partnering with key strategic accounts to pursue prior authorization approvals and reimbursement claims for procedures in which TearCare is used, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful. If patients are not willing to pay for procedures in which TearCare is used, or if third-party payors continue to refuse to provide coverage and reimbursement, or provide insufficient levels of coverage and reimbursement, it could have a negative impact on ECPs’ adoption of TearCare and sales of TearCare, which could adversely affect our business.
Current wording
We also derive revenue from sales of TearCare to ECPs and eye care clinics, which bill all or a portion of the costs and fees associated with treatments and products to patients or, on a limited basis, to third-party payors. We believe that access to adequate coverage and reimbursement for procedures in which TearCare is used by third-party payors is important to the broad acceptance and adoption of TearCare. Currently, no MACs have formal policies establishing coverage for the TearCare procedure; however, MACs from time to time may include, and we are currently aware of three MACs that have included, low payment rates for TearCare procedures in their fee schedules that, if not removed or increased to what we believe is an appropriate reimbursement level, could adversely impact our efforts to achieve reimbursement for TearCare that is sufficient to support its broad commercial growth and adoption. Further, commercial payors may from time to time make “no coverage”
Previous wording
In the United States, the AMA generally assigns specific billing codes for procedures under a coding system known as Current Procedure Terminology, or CPT, which surgeons use to bill third-party payors and receive reimbursement. Once a permanent CPT code ("Category I CPT code") is established for a service, CMS establishes payment levels under Medicare, while other payors may establish rates and coverage rules independently. Canaloplasty followed by trabeculotomy procedures using OMNI are typically billed using the Category I CPT code 66174, which describes canaloplasty. Coding for ophthalmic surgical procedures is complex, and changes to the codes used to report services performed with our products may result in significant changes in reimbursement, which could negatively impact our revenue. For example, in 2021 the RVS Update Committee ("RUC") of the AMA reevaluated the physician work associated with CPT code 66174. As a result of this RUC review and further conversion factor reductions, CMS reduced the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amount associated with this service from approximately $950 in 2021, to $761 in 2022, to $622 in 2023, and to $608 in 2024. Many of the factors considered by the RUC, and many of the factors evaluated by payors and other payor advisory bodies, in assessing the costs of, and payments with respect to, procedures associated with our products are not within our control. For instance, with respect to determination of hospital, ASC and physician payment associated with CPT code 66174, evaluation of procedure costs may include the costs of competitive products that are priced well below our products, and may also reflect reduced physician work with respect to procedures that are less comprehensive than the procedures performed with OMNI. This, in turn, may adversely affect our ability to obtain and maintain adequate and appropriate levels of reimbursement for the comprehensive procedure enabled by our OMNI technology, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
In the United States, the AMA generally assigns specific billing codes for procedures under a coding system known as Current Procedure Terminology (“CPT”), which surgeons use to bill third-party payors and receive reimbursement. Once a permanent CPT code ("Category I CPT code") is established for a service, CMS establishes payment levels under Medicare, while other payors may establish rates and coverage rules independently. Canaloplasty followed by trabeculotomy procedures using OMNI are typically billed using the Category I CPT code 66174, which describes canaloplasty. Coding for ophthalmic surgical procedures is complex, and changes to the codes used to report services performed with our products may result in significant changes in reimbursement, which could negatively impact our revenue. For example, in 2021 the RVS Update Committee ("RUC") of the AMA reevaluated the physician work associated with CPT code 66174. As a result of this RUC review and further conversion factor reductions, CMS reduced the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule amount associated with this service from approximately $950 in 2021, to $761 in 2022, to $622 in 2023, to $608 in 2024, and to $600 in 2025. Many of the factors considered by the RUC, and many of the factors evaluated by payors and other payor advisory bodies, in assessing the costs of, and payments with respect to, procedures associated with our products are not within our control. For instance, with respect to determination of hospital, ASC and physician payment associated with CPT code 66174, evaluation of procedure costs may include the costs of competitive products that are priced well below our products and may also reflect reduced physician work with respect to procedures that are less comprehensive than the procedures performed with OMNI. This, in turn, may adversely affect our ability to obtain and maintain adequate and appropriate levels of reimbursement for the comprehensive procedure enabled by our OMNI technology, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
The AMA maintains a subset of temporary CPT codes ("Category III CPT codes") used for new and emerging technologies. For example, TearCare was assigned a Category III CPT code effective beginning January 1, 2020. Coverage for Category III CPT codes is often limited. Medicare does not generally establish national payment rates for Category III CPT codes on the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule ("MPFS"). As a result, individual Medicare contractors and private payors may establish their own payment rates for services described by Category III CPT codes, as has been the case with TearCare, which payment rates are subject to change, may be variable across Medicare contractors, may be materially below the final reimbursement rates that we are currently targeting, or may determine not to reimburse services described by Category III CPT codes.
Current wording
The AMA maintains a subset of temporary CPT codes ("Category III CPT codes") used for new and emerging technologies. For example, TearCare was assigned a Category III CPT code effective beginning January 1, 2020. Coverage for Category III CPT codes is often limited. Medicare does not generally establish national payment rates for Category III CPT codes on the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule ("MPFS"). As a result, individual Medicare contractors and private payors may establish their own payment rates for services described by Category III CPT codes, as has been the case with TearCare, which payment rates are subject to change, may be variable across Medicare contractors, may be materially below the final reimbursement rates that we are currently targeting, or may determine not to reimburse services described by Category III CPT codes. In 2024, various commercial insurance carriers paid small number of TearCare claims on a case-by-case basis, but these reimbursement amounts varied materially and no formal coverage policies were established.
Previous wording
The market for our products is highly competitive. Our competitors may have longer operating histories, more established products and greater resources than we do, and may be able to develop or market treatments that are safer, more effective or gain greater acceptance in the marketplace than our products.
Current wording
The market for our products is highly competitive and could grow increasingly competitive as new glaucoma and dry eye technologies are introduced in our industry. Our competitors may have longer operating histories, more established products and distribution networks, lower product prices or greater resources than we do, and may be able to develop or market treatments that are safer, more effective or gain greater acceptance in the marketplace than our products.
Previous wording
The medical device industry is highly competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by the introduction of new products and technologies and the other activities of industry participants. We compete, or plan to compete, with medical device and pharmaceutical companies that develop and commercialize products for eye conditions, including Glaukos, AbbVie/Allergan, Novartis, Alcon, Johnson & Johnson, Nova Eye Medical, and New World Medical. These companies, or other entrants into the market, may have or develop competing technologies, other products that are in or that enter clinical trials, new devices or additional indications for existing devices that could demonstrate better safety, effectiveness, clinical results, lower costs or greater ECP and market acceptance than our products. For example, despite what we believe to be the strong safety profile of our products for their intended uses, patients may experience adverse events following canaloplasty or trabeculotomy with OMNI, including, but not limited to, hyphema, mild anterior chamber inflammation and spikes in intraocular pressure. Similarly, patients may experience adverse events following use of the SION surgical instrument, including anterior chamber shallowing and prolonged, or persistent intraocular inflammation, or application of localized heat with TearCare, including discomfort, pain or erythema of the eyelids. Any failure to meet customer and patient expectations and any resulting negative perceptions or publicity could harm our reputation and future sales and therefore adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
The medical device industry is highly competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by the introduction of new products and technologies and the other activities of industry participants. We compete, or plan to compete, with medical device and pharmaceutical companies that develop and commercialize products for eye conditions, including Glaukos, AbbVie, Novartis, Alcon, Johnson & Johnson, Nova Eye Medical, and New World Medical. These companies, or other entrants into the market, may have or develop competing technologies, other products that are in or that enter clinical trials, new devices or additional indications for existing devices that could demonstrate better safety, effectiveness, clinical results, ease of use, lower costs or greater ECP and market acceptance than our products. For example, there has been a recent increase in ECP trialing of alternative products that are offered at lower prices than OMNI, which we believe has had a near-term adverse impact on utilization of OMNI.
Previous wording
We compete, or may compete in the future, against other companies which have longer, more established operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources, which may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration or improved operating results. These companies may enjoy several competitive advantages, including:
Current wording
Furthermore, we compete, or may compete in the future, against other companies which have longer, more established operating histories and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, sales, distribution and other resources, which may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration or improved operating results. These companies may enjoy several competitive advantages, including:
Previous wording
One of the major hurdles to adoption of our products will be overcoming established treatment patterns, which will require educating ECPs and supportive clinical data. However, because of the size of the market opportunity for devices used in procedures to address MIGS and MGD, we believe current and potential future competitors will dedicate significant resources to aggressively promote their products or develop new products or treatments, such as Glaukos’ iStent® technologies, iPRIME™ Viscodelivery System, and iDose® TR intraocular implant. Further, new treatment options may be developed that could compete more effectively with our products due to the prevalence of glaucoma and MGD, and the research and technological progress that exist within the market. Also, even if competitor products do not have indications for use or clinical data that are comparable to ours, ECPs can still choose these competitor products for a variety of reasons, including those set forth above. For instance, competitors may seek to bundle their products in a manner that is attractive to ECPs, which may result in decreased use or adoption of our products by ECPs, notwithstanding that our products may offer superior efficacy.
Current wording
Whereas we have historically competed in the MIGS marketplace against stent technologies, such as the iStent family of products and the Hydrus® MicroStent, we are facing increasing competition from other microcatheter systems marketed for canaloplasty and goniotomy, and we expect this competition to increase in the future. Further, new treatment options may be developed that could compete more effectively with our products due to the prevalence of glaucoma and MGD, and the research and technological progress that exist within the market. Also, even if competitor products do not have indications for use or clinical data that are comparable to ours, ECPs can still choose these competitor products for a variety of reasons, including those discussed above. For instance, competitors may price their products significantly below ours, or bundle their products in a manner that is attractive to ECPs, which may result in decreased use or adoption of our products by ECPs, notwithstanding that our products may offer superior safety and efficacy.
Previous wording
The success of our products depends in part on the skill of the ECPs utilizing and administering products to treat patients and on their adherence to our stated patient selection criteria and the proper techniques that we provide in training sessions. We train ECPs on the correct use of OMNI and SION. However, ECPs rely on their previous medical training and experience when performing ophthalmic surgical procedures and may deviate from the techniques we provide in training sessions. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that all such ECPs who use OMNI and SION will have the necessary skills or experience to safely and effectively perform these procedures. Similarly, though we train ECPs to ensure correct use of TearCare, including placement of SmartLids on patients’ eyelids and expression of the patients' meibomian glands, we cannot guarantee that all such ECPs will have the necessary skills or experience to safely and effectively use these devices. If ECPs utilize our products in a manner that is inconsistent with our labeled indications or with components that are not part of our products, the patient outcomes may be negative. This could negatively impact the perception of patient benefits and safety associated with our products and limit their adoption, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
The success of our products depends in part on the skill of the ECPs utilizing and administering products to treat patients and on their adherence to our stated patient selection criteria and the proper techniques that we provide in training sessions. We train ECPs on the correct use of OMNI and SION. However, ECPs rely on their previous medical training and experience when performing ophthalmic surgical procedures and may deviate from the techniques we provide in training sessions. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee that all such ECPs who use OMNI and SION will have the necessary skills or experience to safely and effectively perform these procedures. We have experienced recent declines in the number of ECPs undergoing training on the use of OMNI, which means that fewer physicians than we had anticipated are being trained regarding appropriate patient selection and OMNI surgical techniques. If we are not able to stabilize and return our physician training rates to a robust growth trajectory, our business could suffer. Similarly, though we train ECPs to ensure correct use of TearCare, including placement of SmartLids on patients’ eyelids and expression of the patients' meibomian glands, we cannot guarantee that all such ECPs will have the necessary skills or experience to safely and effectively use these devices. If ECPs utilize our products in a manner that is inconsistent with our labeled indications or with components that are not part of our products, the patient outcomes may be negative. This could negatively impact the perception of patient benefits and safety associated with our products and limit their adoption, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Development of our products for expanded indications depends upon positive clinical data, and the safety and efficacy of our products for the intended uses for which we intend to seek clearance, certification or approval are not yet supported by long-term clinical data, which could delay or prevent clearance by the FDA (or other foreign authorities or notified bodies) or limit sales if cleared, certified or approved and our products might therefore prove to be less safe or effective than initially thought.
Current wording
Development of our products for expanded indications depends upon positive clinical data, and the safety and efficacy of our products for the intended uses for which we intend to seek clearance, certification or approval are not yet supported by long-term clinical data, which could delay or prevent clearance by the FDA (or other foreign authorities or notified bodies) or limit sales, and our products might prove to be less safe or effective than initially thought.
Previous wording
The products that we market in the United States are regulated as medical devices by the FDA. OMNI and TearCare have received premarket clearance under Section 510(k) of the FDCA. In the 510(k) clearance process, before a device may be marketed the FDA must determine that a proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally-marketed “predicate” device, which includes a device that has been previously cleared through the 510(k) process, a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device), a device that was originally on the U.S. market pursuant to an approved PMA application and later down-classified, or a 510(k)-exempt device. This process is typically shorter and generally requires the submission of less supporting documentation than the FDA’s PMA process and does not always require long-term clinical studies. SION is registered with the FDA as a Class I 510(k) exempt device.
Current wording
The products that we market in the United States are regulated as medical devices by the FDA. OMNI and TearCare have received premarket clearance under Section 510(k) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”). In the 510(k) clearance process, before a device may be marketed the FDA must determine that a proposed device is “substantially equivalent” to a legally marketed “predicate” device, which includes a device that has been previously cleared through the 510(k) process, a device that was legally marketed prior to May 28, 1976 (pre-amendments device), a device that was originally on the U.S. market pursuant to an approved PMA application and later down-classified, or a 510(k)-exempt device. This process is typically shorter and generally requires the submission of less supporting documentation than the FDA’s PMA process and does not always require long-term clinical studies. SION is registered with the FDA as a Class I 510(k) exempt device.
Previous wording
In the EEA Union, a single regulatory approval process exists, and conformity with its requirements is required to affix a CE mark to our medical devices, without which they cannot be marketed or sold in the EEA. We originally received CE marking for OMNI in 2017. To obtain a CE mark, defined products must meet minimum standards of performance, safety, and quality, and then, according to their classification, undergo a conformity assessment procedure. Except for low risk medical devices, a conformity assessment procedure requires the intervention of a third-party organization designated by the competent authorities of an EEA country, known as a Notified Body. The competent authorities of the EU countries separately regulate the clinical research for medical devices and the market surveillance of products once they are placed on the market. A revised regulation, the EU MDR was published by the EU in 2017 and became effective on May 26, 2021. Medical devices marketed in the EEA require certification according to these requirements. The EU MDR includes significant additional premarket and post-market requirements, and manufacturers of medical devices are required by the EU MDR to collect post-marketing clinical data in relation to their CE marked medical devices. Post-market surveillance includes the conduct of post-market clinical follow-up studies permitting manufacturers to gather information concerning quality, safety or performance of medical devices after they have been placed on the market in the EU. All information collected as part of the post-market surveillance process must be reviewed, investigated and analyzed on a regular basis in order to determine whether trending conclusions can be made concerning the safety or performance of the medical device and decisions must be taken in relation to the continued marketing of medical devices currently on the market. We expect to incur ongoing costs to comply with these post-market clinical obligations in EU markets for so long as we continue to market and sell products in those markets, as well as in the EEA markets.
Current wording
In the European Economic Area (“EEA”), a single regulatory approval process exists, and conformity with its requirements is required by its member states and countries to affix a European Conformity (“CE”) mark to our medical devices, without which they cannot be marketed or sold in the EEA. We originally received CE marking for OMNI in 2017. To obtain a CE mark, defined products must meet minimum standards of performance, safety, and quality, and then, according to their classification, undergo a conformity assessment procedure. Except for low-risk medical devices, a conformity assessment procedure requires the intervention of a third-party organization designated by the competent authorities of an EEA country, known as a Notified Body. The competent authorities of the EU countries separately regulate the clinical research for medical devices and the market surveillance of products once they are placed on the market. A revised regulation, the EU MDR was published by the EU in 2017 and became effective on May 26, 2021. Medical devices marketed in the EEA require certification according to these requirements. The EU MDR includes significant additional premarket and post-market requirements, and manufacturers of medical devices are required by the EU MDR to collect post-marketing clinical data in relation to their CE Marked medical devices. Post-market surveillance includes the conduct of post-market clinical follow-up studies permitting manufacturers to gather information concerning quality, safety or performance of medical devices after they have been placed on the market in the EU. All information collected as part of the post-market surveillance process must be reviewed, investigated and analyzed on a regular basis in order to determine whether trending conclusions can be made concerning the safety or performance of the medical device and decisions must be taken in relation to the continued marketing of medical devices currently on the market. We expect to incur ongoing costs to comply with these post-market clinical obligations in EU markets for so long as we continue to market and sell products in those markets, as well as in the EEA markets.
Previous wording
We are conducting and intend to continue conducting additional clinical trials, including clinical trials to increase clinical evidence for OMNI and develop TearCare for expanded indications. In addition, our competitors and other third parties may conduct clinical trials of our products without our participation. If future patient studies or clinical testing do not support our belief that our products are advantageous for their intended uses, market acceptance of our products could fail to increase or could decrease and our business could be harmed. Moreover, if future results and experience by us, our competitors or other third parties, indicate that our products cause unexpected or serious complications or other unforeseen negative effects, we could be subject to mandatory or voluntary product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA, European Commission or other governmental clearance or approval or certifications, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We are conducting and intend to continue conducting additional clinical trials or investigations to develop our devices for expanded indications, including clinical trials to increase clinical evidence for OMNI and develop TearCare for expanded indications. Historical clinical results, including interim results, are not necessarily predictive of future clinical results, and we cannot assure you that the results reported in these studies will be consistent with, or better than, currently available clinical data. In addition, our competitors and other third parties may conduct clinical trials of our products without our participation. If future patient studies or clinical testing do not support our belief that our products are advantageous for their intended uses, market acceptance of our products could fail to increase or could decrease and our business could be harmed.
Previous wording
We are conducting and intend to continue conducting additional clinical trials or investigations to develop our devices for expanded indications. Historical clinical results, including interim results, are not necessarily predictive of future clinical results, and we cannot assure you that the results reported in these studies will be consistent with, or better than, currently available clinical data. Moreover, the outcomes and updates resulting from these studies, including interim results, may be compared to the results of other products and treatments for these same patient populations, and if the comparisons are not favorable, it may limit the ability to obtain clearance, certification or approval of the devices for the expanded indications for which we intend to seek clearance, certification or approval, as well as adoption of our products for their current authorized uses. In addition, our competitors and other third parties may also conduct clinical trials or investigations of our products without our participation. Unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from existing or future clinical trials or investigations conducted by us, our competitors or other third parties, the interpretation of our clinical data or findings of new or more frequent adverse events, could subject us to mandatory or voluntary product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA or other clearance, certification or approval, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Moreover, the outcomes and updates resulting from these studies, including interim results, may be compared to the results of other products and treatments for these same patient populations, and if the comparisons are not favorable, it may limit the ability to obtain clearance, certification or approval of the devices for the expanded indications for which we intend to seek clearance, certification or approval, as well as adoption of our products for their current authorized uses. In addition, unfavorable or inconsistent clinical data from existing or future clinical trials or investigations conducted by us, our competitors or other third parties, the interpretation of our clinical data or findings of new or more frequent adverse events, could subject us to mandatory or voluntary product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA or other clearance, certification or approval, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Moreover, if future results and experience with our products by us, our competitors or other third parties, indicate that our products cause unexpected or serious complications or other unforeseen negative effects, we could be subject to mandatory or voluntary product recalls, suspension or withdrawal of FDA, European Commission or other governmental clearance or approval or certifications, significant legal liability or harm to our business reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Our products will be adopted and compete, in part, based on long-term data regarding patient outcomes and the risk of our products relative to other treatment options. The long-term clinical outcomes of the use of our products for their cleared uses are not known and, due to the novelty of our products, there is no long-term data regarding patient outcomes beyond our clinical trials or investigations. The results of short-term clinical experience of our products do not necessarily predict long-term clinical outcomes. We believe that ECPs will compare the rates of long-term clinical outcomes for procedures using our products for their authorized uses against alternative procedures and treatment options. If the long-term data does not meet ECPs’ expectations, or if the long-term data indicates that our products are not as safe or effective as other treatment options or as current short-term data would suggest, physicians may recommend alternative treatments for their patients and our products may not become widely adopted, which will negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Our products will be adopted and compete, in part, based on long-term data regarding patient outcomes and the risk of our products relative to other treatment options. The long-term clinical outcomes of the use of our products for their FDA-cleared uses are not known and, due to the novelty of our products, there is no long-term data regarding patient outcomes beyond our clinical trials or investigations. The results of short-term clinical experience of our products do not necessarily predict long-term clinical outcomes. We believe ECPs and third-party payers will compare the rates of long-term clinical outcomes for procedures using our products for their authorized uses against alternative procedures and treatment options. We also believe that ECPs and payers will give added weight to outcomes data derived from randomized controlled trials, which are considered to be the “gold standard” for proving efficacy of a treatment or intervention; while our TearCare SAHARA trial is an RCT, we have not completed an RCT for our OMNI technology, which may prove to be a competitive disadvantage as compared to competitive products with positive RCT data. If the nature and quality of the long-term data does not meet ECPs’ expectations, or if the long-term data indicates that our products are not as safe or effective as other treatment options or as current short-term data would suggest, physicians may recommend alternative treatments for their patients and our products may not become widely adopted, which will negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, if we choose to, or are required to, conduct additional studies, equivocal or unfavorable results from such studies or experience could lead to a reduction in the rate of coverage and reimbursement by both public and private third-party payors for procedures that are performed with our products, slow market adoption of our products by ECPs, significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected revenue and prevent us from being profitable.
Previous wording
We rely on third parties to manufacture and supply our products, many of which are single-source providers, and we are subject to numerous risks relating to our reliance on third parties.
Current wording
We rely on third parties to manufacture and supply our products. A number of these suppliers are single-source providers, and certain key suppliers are located outside of the U.S. We are subject to numerous risks relating to our reliance on such third parties.
Previous wording
Our business strategy depends on our ability to manufacture our current and future products in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis to meet customer demand, while adhering to product quality standards, complying with regulatory quality system requirements and managing manufacturing costs. We do not have any internal manufacturing capabilities or infrastructure and rely on a limited number of third-party manufacturers, many of which are single source suppliers, for a portion of the components, accessories, materials and assembly that we utilize in our products. These items are critical and, for certain items, there are relatively few or no readily available alternative sources of supply. These single source suppliers may be unwilling or unable to supply these items reliably and at the levels we anticipate or that are required by the market. For example, our OMNI and SION products, and certain of our TearCare system components, are primarily produced and assembled by a single Taiwan-based manufacturer in China, though we have also contracted with a U.S.-based manufacturer to produce and assemble OMNI products. We also have supply arrangements with other suppliers for the production of certain TearCare system components. For our business strategy to be successful, our suppliers must be able to provide us with products in sufficient quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s QSR or other applicable laws or regulations enforced by the FDA, state and foreign regulatory authorities, in accordance with agreed-upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis.
Current wording
Our business strategy depends on our ability to manufacture our current and future products in sufficient quantities, on terms that are acceptable to us, and on a timely basis to meet customer demand, while adhering to product quality standards, complying with regulatory quality system requirements, and managing manufacturing costs. We do not have any internal manufacturing capabilities or infrastructure and rely on a limited number of third-party manufacturers, many of which are single-source suppliers, and certain of which are located outside the U.S., for the components, accessories, materials and assembly that we utilize in our products. These items are critical, and, for certain items, there are relatively few or no readily available alternative sources of supply. These single-source suppliers may be unwilling or unable to supply these items reliably and at the levels we anticipate or that are required by the market, or we may be unable to purchase these items on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.
Previous wording
While our suppliers have generally met our demand requirements on a timely basis in the past, their ability and willingness to continue to do so going forward may be limited for several reasons, including financial difficulties, damage to their manufacturing equipment or facilities, inability to obtain components, problems with their own suppliers, our relative importance as a customer to each manufacturer, or geopolitical or trade tensions between China and Taiwan or China and the United States. If we are unable to meet our demand requirements on a timely basis, we may not have a sufficient number of our products available for delivery to support ECPs that utilize our products as part of their treatment. For instance, if our supply of OMNI products from our manufacturer in China was interrupted or suspended for any significant period, we may be unable to meet customer demand for our OMNI products during that time. Any shortfall in the supply of products may result in lower adoption and usage rates of our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
For our business strategy to be successful, our suppliers must be able to provide us with products in sufficient quantities, in compliance with regulatory requirements, including the FDA’s Quality System Regulation (“QSR”) or other applicable laws or regulations enforced by the FDA, state and foreign regulatory authorities, in accordance with agreed-upon specifications, at acceptable costs and on a timely basis, and current and future tariffs or trade wars could materially and adversely impact our ability to do so. If we are unable to meet our demand requirements on a timely basis, we may not have enough of our products available for delivery to support ECPs that utilize our products as part of their treatment. For instance, if our supply of OMNI, SION, and certain TearCare products from our manufacturer in China was interrupted or suspended for any significant period, or tariffs that materially affect our products or components were imposed at a significantly high enough level by the United States, we may be unable to meet customer demand for our OMNI, SION, and TearCare products during that time. Any shortfall in the supply of products may result in lower adoption and usage rates of our products and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
The process of identifying and qualifying alternative manufacturing facilities for any other reason could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, and could affect the performance specifications of our products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and engage alternative contract manufacturers on terms similar to our current arrangements, or without delay. Furthermore, our contract manufacturers could require that their manufacture and assembly of our products be moved to another of their production facilities. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our ability to meet the demand for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
The process of identifying and qualifying alternative manufacturing facilities for any other reason could be time-consuming and expensive, may result in interruptions in our operations and product delivery, and could affect the performance specifications of our products. We cannot assure you that we will be able to identify and engage alternative contract manufacturers on terms similar to our current arrangements, or without delay. Furthermore, our contract manufacturers could require that their manufacture and assembly of our products be moved to another of their production facilities, which would require us to complete another re-qualification process at the new facility, with no guarantee that the new facility would pass our quality audit. The occurrence of any of these events could harm our ability to meet the demand for our products in a timely and cost-effective manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
We are also subject to numerous other risks relating to our reliance on third parties, including potential quality issues at our suppliers' manufacturing facilities with respect to our products, and our potential inability to renew or extend contracts and arrangements with such third parties or renew any such contracts or arrangements on terms that are favorable to us, and price fluctuations due to a lack of long-term supply agreements with certain of our suppliers. These risks are likely to be exacerbated by our limited experience with our current products and manufacturing processes. As demand for our products increases, we will have to invest additional resources to manage the manufacturing process. If we fail to secure increased production capacity efficiently, we may not be able to fill customer orders on a timely basis, our sales may not increase in line with our expectations and our operating margins could fluctuate or decline. In addition, the manufacture of future products may require modification of the current production processes or unique production processes, the identification of new suppliers for specific components, sub-assemblies and materials or the development of new manufacturing technologies. It may not be possible for our current third-party manufacturers to produce these products at a cost or in quantities sufficient to make these products commercially viable or to maintain current operating margins, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
We are also subject to numerous other risks relating to our reliance on third parties, including potential quality issues at our suppliers' manufacturing facilities with respect to our products or logistics operations, and our potential inability to renew or extend contracts and arrangements with such third parties or renew any such contracts or arrangements on terms that are favorable to us, and price fluctuations due to a lack of long-term supply agreements with certain of our suppliers. These risks are likely to be exacerbated by our limited experience with our current products and manufacturing processes. If demand for our products increases, we will have to invest additional resources to manage the manufacturing process. If we fail to secure increased production capacity efficiently, we may not be able to fill customer orders on a timely basis, our sales may not increase in line with our expectations and our operating margins could fluctuate or decline. In addition, the manufacture of future products may require modification of the current production processes or unique production processes, the identification of new suppliers for specific components, sub-assemblies and materials or the development of new manufacturing technologies. It may not be possible for our current third-party manufacturers to produce these products at a cost or in quantities sufficient to make these products commercially viable or to maintain current operating margins, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Uncertainty in current global economic and political conditions could adversely affect our ability to predict product demand and impact our financial results, and makes it more likely that our actual results could differ materially from expectations.
Current wording
Uncertainty in current global economic and political conditions could adversely affect our ability to predict product demand and costs and impact our financial results, and makes it more likely that our results will differ materially from expectations.
Previous wording
Our operations and performance depend in part on worldwide economic and political conditions. Certain of the jurisdictions in which our products are sold have experienced and could continue to experience unfavorable general economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, including as a result of political instability and military hostilities in certain geographies, concerns over the potential downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt and continued sovereign debt, monetary and financial uncertainties in Europe and other geographies, and domestic and global inflationary trends, any of which could negatively affect the affordability of, and consumer demand for, our products. Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to modify spending priorities and reduce discretionary spending by delaying purchases of our products, which could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our overall financial performance. Other financial uncertainties in our major markets and unstable political conditions in certain markets, including civil unrest and governmental changes, could undermine global consumer confidence and reduce consumers’ purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for our products. We cannot predict the reoccurrence of any economic slowdown or the strength or sustainability of the economic recovery, worldwide, in the United States, or in our industry. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Current wording
Our operations and performance depend in part on worldwide economic and political conditions. Certain of the jurisdictions in which our products are manufactured or sold have experienced and could continue to experience unfavorable general economic conditions, such as a recession or economic slowdown, including as a result of political instability and military hostilities in certain geographies, trade disputes, concerns over the potential downgrade of U.S. sovereign debt and continued sovereign debt, monetary and financial uncertainties in Europe and other geographies, and domestic and global inflationary trends, any of which could negatively affect the affordability of, and consumer demand for, our products. Under difficult economic conditions, consumers may seek to modify spending priorities and reduce discretionary spending by delaying purchases of our products, which could reduce our profitability and could negatively affect our overall financial performance. Other financial uncertainties in our major markets and unstable political conditions in certain markets, including civil unrest and governmental changes, could undermine global consumer confidence and reduce consumers’ purchasing power, thereby reducing demand for our products. We cannot predict the reoccurrence of any economic slowdown or the strength or sustainability of the economic recovery, worldwide, in the United States, or in our industry. These and other economic factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Previous wording
We have limited experience in training on, and marketing and selling, our products and we may provide inadequate training, fail to increase our sales and marketing capabilities or fail to develop broad brand awareness in a cost-effective manner.
Current wording
We may provide inadequate training, fail to maintain effective sales and marketing capabilities or fail to develop broad brand awareness in a cost-effective manner.
Showing the first 40 of 85 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (4)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
To effectively market and sell our products, we will need to continue to educate the medical community about the safety, efficacy, necessity and efficiency of our products and about the patient populations that would potentially benefit from the use of our products. For example, if first-line ECPs or primary care physicians that serve as the early point of contact for patients are not made aware of our OMNI products, they may not refer patients to ECPs who utilize our products, and those patients may be treated with alternative procedures or treatments. Further, we have experienced recent declines in the numbers of surgeons we are training on the use of OMNI to perform MIGS procedures, and if we are unable to increase ECP training rates, our business and results of operations may suffer.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
or similar determinations with respect to our TearCare product that could hamper our efforts to drive broad commercial adoption of TearCare. These determinations could be made with reference to a variety of factors, including our legacy TearCare component pricing practices, perceived clinical efficacy compared to other treatment alternatives and similar considerations. We are pursuing a comprehensive long-term market development and patient access plan for TearCare and focusing our efforts on partnering with key strategic accounts to pursue prior authorization approvals and reimbursement claims for procedures in which TearCare is used, but there is no guarantee that we will be successful. This strategy is dependent, among other things, on ECPs’ willingness to submit, and success in submitting, TearCare procedure claims with invoicing that supports appropriate reimbursement, as well as their success in appealing these claims with payors as needed. If patients are not willing to pay for procedures in which TearCare is used, or if third-party payors continue to decline to provide coverage and reimbursement, or provide insufficient levels of coverage and reimbursement, it would have a negative impact on ECPs’ adoption of TearCare and sales of TearCare, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
In addition, despite what we believe to be the strong safety profile of our products for their intended uses, patients may experience adverse events following canaloplasty or trabeculotomy with OMNI, including hyphema, mild anterior chamber inflammation and spikes in intraocular pressure. Similarly, patients may experience adverse events following use of the SION surgical instrument, including anterior chamber shallowing and prolonged, or persistent intraocular inflammation, or application of localized heat with TearCare, including discomfort, pain or erythema of the eyelids. Any failure to meet customer and patient expectations and any resulting negative perceptions or publicity could harm our reputation and future sales and therefore adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
One of the major hurdles to adoption of our products will be overcoming established treatment patterns, which will require educating ECPs and supportive clinical data. For instance, we believe strongly in the efficacy of OMNI in Standalone Procedures, but concerted ongoing ECP education on the benefits of this approach is needed to alter surgeon perceptions and to convince them of the benefits of performing a MIGS procedure other than in conjunction with cataract surgery. Because of the size of the market opportunity for devices used in procedures to address MIGS and MGD, we believe current and potential future competitors will dedicate significant resources to aggressively promote their products or develop new products or treatments, such as Glaukos’ iStent® technologies, iPRIME™ Viscodelivery System, and iDose® TR intraocular implant; Alcon’s Hydrus® MicroStent; and various canaloplasty devices including Nova Eye’s iTrack™ Advance and New World’s Streamline® and Via360™ surgical systems.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The safety and efficacy of some of our products is not yet supported by long-term clinical data, which could limit sales, and our products might therefore prove to be less safe or effective than initially thought.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
We believe that ECPs will compare the rates of long-term clinical outcomes for procedures using our products for their authorized uses against alternative procedures and treatment options. If we choose to, or are required to, conduct additional studies, equivocal or unfavorable results from such studies or experience could lead to a reduction in the rate of coverage and reimbursement by both public and private third-party payors for procedures that are performed with our products, slow market adoption of our products by ECPs, significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected revenues and prevent us from being profitable.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
17.8 million have been diagnosed with DED. Studies have shown that evaporative DED resulting from MGD is associated with up to 86% of all DED cases.