Claros Mortgage Trust Inc
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 19, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 19, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-20.
0000950170-24-017115
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-19.
0000950170-25-023258
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 358 previous paragraphs and 370 current paragraphs.
299 unchanged; 54 reworded; 13 added; 4 removed; 1 previous and 4 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (13)
Current report
As of December 31, 2024, our portfolio weighted average origination LTV and weighted average adjusted LTV is 70.4% and 72.2%, respectively. Weighted average origination LTV is based on loan commitment, including non-consolidated senior interests and pari passu interests, and excludes risk rated 5 loans. Weighted average adjusted LTV is based on loan commitment, including non-consolidated senior interests, pari passu interests, and risk rated 5 loans. Loans with specific CECL reserves are reflected as 100% LTV.
Current report
We have a significant amount of debt outstanding with near-term maturities, and we may be unable to make deleveraging payments, obtain adjustments to modify our repayment schedule or obtain replacement financing with similar terms.
Current report
As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $4.9 billion in consolidated indebtedness outstanding. Of this indebtedness, approximately $606.0 million is scheduled to mature in the coming year with no further maturity extension options available on the respective financings. Of such amount, $85.9 million was repaid in January 2025 in connection with the sale of a loan and $275.0 million relates to our real estate owned hotel portfolio. As market conditions evolve, we expect to continue to work with our financing counterparties as needed to seek adjustments to the timing and amount of any required principal repayment obligations; however, there can be no assurance that such counterparties will agree to modify the required amount or timing of such repayments. In certain instances, we may be need to find replacement financing, if available, which could be on less favorable terms, or pledge additional collateral to our financing facilities, all of which may reduce available liquidity.
Current report
During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we made deleveraging payments to certain of our financing counterparties and expect to continue to do so as agreed with our lenders or on an as-needed basis. However, our ability to make any future deleveraging payments will be dependent upon the results of our operating activities, our financial condition, and the overall market conditions in which we operate, among other factors.
Current report
In addition, certain of our financing agreements contain financial covenants that require us to maintain minimum levels of liquidity. We currently maintain, and seek to maintain, cash and liquidity to comply with such minimum liquidity requirements under our financings. We also seek to maintain excess cash and liquidity to meet our primary liquidity needs, including principal repayment obligations under certain of our secured financings, and seek to meet such liquidity needs through our primary sources of liquidity as discussed further in Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Sources of Liquidity.” During the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, we made deleveraging payments to certain of our financing counterparties and expect to continue to do so as agreed with our lenders or on an as-needed basis. Our ability to make any future deleveraging payments will depend upon the results of our operating activities, our financial condition, and the overall market conditions in which we operate, among other factors. In addition, as market conditions evolve, we expect to continue to work with our secured financing counterparties as needed to seek adjustments to the timing and amount of any required principal repayment obligations; however, there is no assurance that such counterparties will agree to modify the required amount or timing of such repayments.
Current report
For example, certain of our existing lenders and financing counterparties, require that our ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization to interest charges (“Interest Coverage Ratio”) as defined in our repurchase agreements and term participation facility shall not be less than 1.1 to 1.0, whereas our ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization to interest charges as defined in our secured term loan shall not be less than 1.5 to 1.0. Further, (i) our tangible net worth, as defined in the agreements, shall not be less than $1.86 billion as of each measurement date; (ii) cash liquidity shall not be less than the greater of (x) $50 million or (y) 5% of our recourse indebtedness (which includes our secured term loan); and (iii) our indebtedness shall not exceed 77.8% of our total assets. The requirements set forth in (i) through (iii) above are based upon the most restrictive financial covenants in place as of the reporting date. Commencing with the quarter ended December 31, 2025, our Interest Coverage Ratio shall not be less than 1.3 to 1.0. Further, we have modified our covenants to provide that for the quarters ended March 31, 2025 and June 30, 2025, our cash liquidity shall not be less than the greater of (x) $20 million or (y) 3% of our recourse indebtedness (which includes our secured term loan). Such covenants may be required by future lenders or financing counterparties. In addition, certain of our existing lenders require, and future lenders may require, us to agree that we would be in default if our Manager or one or more of its executive officers cease to serve in such capacity for any reason.
Current report
changes to benchmark interest rates as determined by the U.S. Federal Reserve;
Current report
implementation of strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value;
Current report
Our business and operations could be negatively affected if we become subject to any securities litigation or shareholder activism, which could cause us to incur significant expense, hinder execution of our business strategy and impact the market price of our common stock.
Current report
In the past, following periods of volatility or reductions in the market price of a company’s securities, in some cases securities class action litigation has been brought against that company. Publicly traded companies also may become the target of shareholder activism, which could take many forms or arise in a variety of situations, including as a result of volatility or reductions in the market price of such company’s common stock. Securities litigation and shareholder activism, including potential proxy contests, could result in substantial costs and legal fees and divert management’s and our Board’s attention and resources from our business. Additionally, any such securities litigation and shareholder activism could give rise to actual or perceived business uncertainties, adversely affect our relationships with service providers and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel. Further, the market price of our common stock could be subject to significant fluctuation or otherwise be adversely affected by the events, risks and uncertainties of any securities litigation and shareholder activism.
Current report
From time to time we may implement measures that make it more difficult for an activist investor or potential acquirer to purchase a large portion of our securities, to initiate a tender offer or a proxy contest, or to acquire the Company through a merger or similar transaction. These measures may discourage investment in our common stock and may delay or discourage acquisitions that would result in our stockholders receiving a premium for their shares over the then-current market price.
Removed paragraphs (4)
Previous report
our ability to make investments that generate attractive risk-adjusted returns;
Previous report
margin calls, obligations to accelerate repayment of financings or other expenses that reduce our cash flow;
Previous report
defaults in our portfolio or decreases in the value of our portfolio; and
Previous report
uncertainty surrounding the strength of the U.S. economic recovery;
Reworded paragraphs (54)
Previous wording
We originate and acquire loans on transitional CRE properties to borrowers who are typically seeking capital for repositioning, renovation, rehabilitation, leasing, development, redevelopment or construction. The typical borrower under a loan on a transitional asset has usually identified an undervalued asset that has been under-managed and/or is located in an improving market. If the market in which the asset is located fails to materialize according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management and/or the value of the asset, or if it costs the borrower more than estimated or takes longer to execute its business plan than estimated, including as a result of supply chain disruptions, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy our loan or may experience a prolonged reduction of net operating income and may not be able to make payments on our loan on a timely basis or at all, which could materially and adversely affect us. Other risks may include: environmental risks, delays in legal and other approvals (e.g., certificates of occupancy), other construction and renovation risks and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule. Accordingly, we bear the risk that we may not recover some or all of our loan unpaid principal balance and interest thereon.
Current wording
We originate and acquire loans on transitional CRE properties to borrowers who are typically seeking capital for repositioning, renovation, rehabilitation, leasing, development, redevelopment or construction. The typical borrower under a loan on a transitional asset has usually identified an undervalued asset that has been under-managed and/or is located in an improving market. If the market in which the asset is located fails to materialize according to the borrower’s projections, or if the borrower fails to improve the quality of the asset’s management and/or the value of the asset, or if it costs the borrower more than estimated or takes longer to execute its business plan than estimated, including as a result of supply chain and labor market disruptions or changes in their capital position and available liquidity, the borrower may not receive a sufficient return on the asset to satisfy our loan or may experience a prolonged reduction of net operating income and may not be able to make payments on our loan on a timely basis or at all, which could materially and adversely affect us. Other risks may include: environmental risks, delays in legal and other approvals (e.g., certificates of occupancy), other construction and renovation risks and subsequent leasing of the property not being completed on schedule. Accordingly, we bear the risk that we may not recover some or all of our loan unpaid principal balance and interest thereon.
Previous wording
Furthermore, borrowers usually use the proceeds of permanent financing to repay a loan on a transitional property after the CRE property is stabilized. Loans on transitional CRE properties are therefore subject to risks of a borrower’s inability to obtain permanent financing to repay our loan, which is exacerbated in times of capital markets volatility. Our loans are also subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud and losses. In the event of any default under our loans, we bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the underlying asset and the principal amount and unpaid interest and fees of our loan. To the extent we suffer losses with respect to our loans, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
Current wording
As a transitional lender, we may from time to time execute loan modifications with borrowers when and if appropriate, which may include terms less favorable to us, such as temporary deferrals of interest or principal, partial deferral of coupon interest as payment-in-kind interest, and/or a discounted loan payoff. Furthermore, borrowers usually use the proceeds of permanent financing to repay a loan on a transitional property after the CRE property is stabilized. Loans on transitional CRE properties are therefore subject to risks of a borrower’s inability to obtain permanent financing to repay our loan, which is exacerbated in times of capital markets volatility. Our loans are also subject to risks of borrower defaults, bankruptcies, fraud and losses. In the event of any default under our loans, we bear the risk of loss of principal and non-payment of interest and fees to the extent of any deficiency between the value of the underlying asset and the principal amount and unpaid interest and fees of our loan. To the extent we suffer losses with respect to our loans, it could have a material adverse effect on us.
Previous wording
Difficult conditions in the commercial mortgage and real estate market, the capital markets and the economy generally, as a result of recent and drastic increases in interest rates, recent inflationary pressures and other factors, could make it difficult for our borrowers to satisfy their repayment obligations and may materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
Difficult conditions in the commercial mortgage and real estate market, the capital markets and the economy generally, as a result of fluctuations in interest rates, inflationary pressures and other factors, could make it difficult for our borrowers to satisfy their repayment obligations and may materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
We could be materially and adversely affected by conditions in the commercial mortgage and real estate markets, the capital markets and the economy generally. A deterioration of economic and real estate fundamentals generally and of local market conditions where our real estate collateral is located, have in the past negatively impacted, and could continue to negatively impact, our performance, the business prospects of our borrowers or the value of our real estate collateral. Market fluctuations or a general decline in real estate values or business prospects may also induce borrowers to voluntarily or involuntarily default on their loans and make it relatively more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Other factors beyond our control, such as changes in interest rates, government regulations (such as rent control, zoning laws, and bank reserve requirements), changes in real property tax rates and operating expenses, changes in the general availability of debt financing (which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable) may likewise have a material and adverse effect on our business. In particular, a protracted period of high interest rates could cause our borrowers to become unwilling or unable to make payments on their loans, increasing default risk and making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Similarly, continuing uncertainty in the office leasing market as a result of the increase in remote working arrangements could adversely affect the business of our borrowers with office properties, which could in turn cause such borrowers to become unwilling or unable to make payments on their loans, increasing default risk and making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
Current wording
We could be materially and adversely affected by conditions in the commercial mortgage and real estate markets, the capital markets and the economy generally. A deterioration of economic and real estate fundamentals generally and of local market conditions where our real estate collateral is located, have in the past negatively impacted, and could continue to negatively impact, our performance, the business prospects of our borrowers or the value of our real estate collateral. Market fluctuations or a general decline in real estate values or business prospects may also induce borrowers to voluntarily or involuntarily default on their loans and make it relatively more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Other factors beyond our control, such as changes in interest rates, government regulations (such as rent control, zoning laws, and bank reserve requirements), changes in real property tax rates and operating expenses, changes in the general availability of debt financing (which may render the sale or refinancing of properties difficult or impracticable) may likewise have a material and adverse effect on our business. The current period of high interest rates relative to recent historical standards has caused and may continue to cause our borrowers to become unwilling or unable to make payments on their loans, increasing default risk and making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns. Similarly, continuing uncertainty in the office leasing market as a result of the increase in remote working arrangements could adversely affect the business of our borrowers with office properties, which could in turn cause such borrowers to become unwilling or unable to make payments on their loans, increasing default risk and making it more difficult for us to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns.
Previous wording
Because our investments are susceptible to general economic slowdowns or recessions, these kinds of changes in market conditions could lead to financial losses in our investments and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. We may realize losses related to foreclosures or to the restructuring of the loans in our investment portfolio on terms that may be more favorable to borrowers than those underwritten at origination. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, impede our ability to maintain accretive financings, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.
Current wording
Because our investments may be susceptible to general economic slowdowns or recessions, these kinds of adverse changes in market conditions could lead to financial losses in our investments and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. We may realize losses related to foreclosures, sales of loans receivable, or to the restructuring of the loans in our investment portfolio on terms that may be more favorable to borrowers than those underwritten at origination. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, impede our ability to maintain financings, limit our access to the capital markets, cause us to be unable to comply with minimum liquidity requirements or other restrictive covenants under our financing agreements, impede our ability to make deleveraging payments, impede our ability to declare and make dividend payments to our stockholders necessary to satisfy REIT dividend requirements, or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from making new investments and adversely affect our operating performance.
Previous wording
In addition, protracted periods of high interest rates generally reduce the economic feasibility of and therefore the demand for transitional CRE loans due to the higher cost of borrowing. A reduction in the volume of CRE loans originated may affect the volume of certain target assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire target assets that satisfy our investment objectives. If high interest rates cause us to be unable to originate or acquire a sufficient volume of our target assets with a yield that is above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives to generate income and pay dividends may be materially and adversely affected.
Current wording
In addition, the current period of high interest rates relative to recent historical standards has reduced and may continue to reduce the economic feasibility of and therefore the demand for transitional CRE loans due to the higher cost of borrowing. A reduction in the volume of CRE loans originated may affect the volume of certain target assets available to us, which could adversely affect our ability to acquire target assets that satisfy our investment objectives. If high interest rates cause us to be unable to originate or acquire a sufficient volume of our target assets with a yield that is above our borrowing cost, our ability to satisfy our investment objectives to generate income and pay dividends may be materially and adversely affected.
Previous wording
While we intend to diversify our loan portfolio of investments in the manner described in this report, we are not required to observe specific diversification criteria, and we have criteria outlined in our investment guidelines that can only be changed with approval of our Board. Therefore, our portfolio of target assets is and may be concentrated in certain property types that are subject to higher risk of achieving their stated business plans or other concentration risk, or supported by properties concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. For example, as of December 31, 2023, our real estate owned consisted of seven limited service hotel properties and one mixed-use property in New York, NY and 22% of our loans are secured by CRE assets (or equity interests relating thereto) located in the New York metropolitan area. Further, as of December 31, 2023, 41% of our loan investments were secured by multi-family properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 19% of our loan investments were secured by hospitality properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 14% of our loan investments were secured by office properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 3% of our loan investments were secured by for sale condo properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 9% of our loan investments were secured by mixed-use properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 7% of our loan investments were secured by land properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 17% of our loan investments were construction loans (based on loan commitment), and our 15 largest loan investments represented 47% of our loan portfolio, in each case based on carrying value.
Current wording
While we intend to diversify our loan portfolio of investments in the manner described in this report, we are not required to observe specific diversification criteria, and we have criteria outlined in our investment guidelines that can only be changed with approval of our Board. Therefore, our portfolio of target assets is and may be concentrated in certain property types that are subject to higher risk of achieving their stated business plans or other concentration risk, or supported by properties concentrated in a limited number of geographic locations. For example, as of December 31, 2024, our real estate owned consisted of seven limited service hotel properties and one mixed-use property in New York, NY and 20% of our loans receivable held-for-investment are secured by CRE assets (or equity interests relating thereto) located in the New York metropolitan area. Further, as of December 31, 2024, 43% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were secured by multi-family properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 19% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were secured by hospitality properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 14% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were secured by office properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 9% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were secured by mixed-use properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 8% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were secured by land properties (or equity interests relating thereto), 11% of our loans receivable held-for-investment were construction loans (based on loan commitment), and our 15 largest loans receivable held-for-investment represented 53% of our loans receivable held-for-investment portfolio, in each case based on carrying value net of specific CECL reserves.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2023, 8 investments with a carrying value prior to any specific CECL reserves of $715.1 million, or 10.3% of our portfolio were on non-accrual status. See Note 3 - Loan Portfolio for further detail on our loans on non-accrual status.
Current wording
As of December 31, 2024, 14 investments with a carrying value net of specific CECL reserves of $0.9 billion, or 15.3% of our portfolio were on non-accrual status. See Note 3 - Loan Portfolio for further detail on our loans on non-accrual status.
Previous wording
The assets in our portfolio are relatively illiquid investments due to their relatively short expected lives, lack of (or limited) cash flow from property that is collateral for those loans, their potential unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recovery in the event of a borrower’s default. In addition, certain of our investments may become less liquid after our investment as a result of periods of delinquencies or defaults or turbulent market conditions. For example, there is an inverse relationship between credit spreads and the value of our existing assets such that widening in credit spreads diminishes the value of existing assets. The illiquidity of the assets in our portfolio and our target assets may make it more difficult for us to dispose of these assets in the event that we no longer intend to hold them until maturity or in the event of a defaulted loan, as the case may be, at advantageous times or prices, or in a timely manner. As a result, we expect many of our investments will be illiquid. If we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than an asset’s carrying value. As a result, our ability to strengthen our portfolio composition in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
The assets in our portfolio are relatively illiquid investments due to their relatively short expected lives, lack of (or limited) cash flow from property that is collateral for those loans, their potential unsuitability for securitization and the greater difficulty of recovery in the event of a borrower’s default or a diminution in the value of the collateral asset. In addition, certain of our investments may become less liquid after our investment as a result of periods of delinquencies or defaults or turbulent market conditions. There is generally an inverse relationship between credit spreads and the value of our existing assets such that widening in credit spreads generally diminishes the value of existing assets. The illiquidity of the assets in our portfolio and our target assets may make it more difficult for us to dispose of these assets in the event that we no longer intend to hold them until maturity or in the event of a defaulted loan, as the case may be, at advantageous times or prices, or in a timely manner. As a result, we expect many of our investments will be illiquid. Although we generally intend to hold our loans to maturity, sales of loans receivable, which may result in realized losses, discounted loan payoffs, and/or sales of real estate owned assets may occur in order to redeploy capital to more accretive opportunities, meet operating objectives, adapt to market conditions, and/or manage liquidity needs. Furthermore, we cannot predict the timing or impact of future asset sales or loan repayments, and since many of our loans are financed, a portion or in some cases all, of the net proceeds from the sales or repayments of our loans are expected to be used to de-lever our secured financings. If we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than an asset’s carrying value. As a result, our ability to strengthen our portfolio composition in response to changes in economic and other conditions may be relatively limited, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
In the event of borrower distress or a default, we may lack the liquidity necessary to protect our investment or avoid a corresponding default on any obligations we may have related to our own financing.
Current wording
In the event of borrower distress or a default, we may lack the liquidity necessary to protect our investment or avoid a corresponding default on any obligations we may have related to financing against our investments.
Previous wording
In the event of borrower distress or a default, we may lack the liquidity necessary to protect our investment or avoid a corresponding default on any obligations we may have with respect to our own financing specifically related to, or otherwise impacted by, such investment. In the event of a default by a borrower on a non-recourse loan, we generally will have recourse only to the underlying asset (including any escrowed funds and reserves) collateralizing that loan, except to the extent of any creditworthy guaranteesas discussed in “—Risks Related to Our Investments—Most of the CRE loans that we originate or acquire are non-recourse loans and the assets securing these loans may not be sufficient to protect us from a partial or complete loss if the borrower defaults on the loan, which could materially and adversely affect us.” In addition, declines in real estate values may induce mortgagors to voluntarily default on their loans, increasing the risk of foreclosure and loss of capital. If the underlying property collateralizing the loan is insufficient to satisfy the outstanding balance of such loan, after expenses incurred in connection with enforcing our rights, we may suffer a loss of principal or interest that adversely affects our liquidity and our ability to service or repay our own leverage. Real estate investments generally lack liquidity compared to other financial assets, and the increased lack of liquidity resulting from a borrower distress or a default may limit our ability to quickly stabilize or strengthen our portfolio or take other necessary actions to avoid a corresponding default on our financing. In certain instances, we may be required to de-lever our financing specifically related to, or otherwise impacted by, such defaulted loan, modify our financing facility or find replacement financing, if available, which could be on less favorable terms, or pledge additional collateral to our financing facility, all of which could materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
In the event of borrower distress or a default, we may lack the liquidity necessary to protect our investment or avoid a corresponding default on any obligations we may have with respect to our financing against our investments specifically related to, or otherwise impacted by, such investment. In the event of a default by a borrower on a non-recourse loan, we generally will have recourse only to the underlying asset (including any escrowed funds and reserves) collateralizing that loan, except to the extent of any creditworthy guaranteesas discussed in “—Risks Related to Our Investments—Most of the CRE loans that we originate or acquire are non-recourse loans and the assets securing these loans may not be sufficient to protect us from a partial or complete loss if the borrower defaults on the loan, which could materially and adversely affect us.” In addition, declines in real estate values may induce mortgagors to voluntarily default on their loans, increasing the risk of foreclosure and loss of capital. If the underlying property collateralizing the loan is insufficient to satisfy the outstanding balance of such loan, after expenses incurred in connection with enforcing our rights, we may suffer a loss of principal or interest that adversely affects our liquidity and our ability to service or repay our own leverage. Real estate investments generally lack liquidity compared to other financial assets, and the increased lack of liquidity resulting from a borrower distress or a default may limit our ability to quickly stabilize or strengthen our portfolio or take other necessary actions to avoid a corresponding default on our financing. In certain instances, we may be required to de-lever our financing specifically related to, or otherwise impacted by, such defaulted loan, modify our financing facility or find replacement financing, if available, which could be on less favorable terms, or pledge additional collateral to our financing facility, all of which could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
We may be unable to maintain or refinance debt incurred to finance our loans and our operations, thereby increasing the amount of equity capital risk we bear with respect to particular loans or preventing us from deploying our equity capital in the optimal manner.
Current wording
We may be unable to maintain or refinance debt incurred to finance our investments and our operations, thereby increasing the amount of equity capital risk we bear with respect to particular investments or preventing us from deploying our equity capital in the optimal manner.
Previous wording
We may be unable to maintain or refinance debt incurred to finance our loans and our operations, thereby increasing the amount of equity capital risk we bear with respect to particular loans or preventing us from deploying our equity capital in the optimal manner. If we are unable to maintain or refinance such debt at appropriate times, we may be required to sell assets at a loss or on terms that are not advantageous to us or take action that could result in other negative consequences. We may only be able to partly replace or refinance such debt if underwriting standards, including loan-to-value ratios and yield requirements, among other requirements, are stricter than when we originally financed our loans. Additionally, as a result of economic headwinds, certain of our borrowers may request term extensions, and we may not be able to maintain or obtain corresponding match-term financing or in certain cases obtain required approvals from our financing counterparties. Obtaining such approvals has required in the past and may require in the future reduction of advance rates on financings, increased borrowing costs, increasing recourse or a combination thereof, which could have an adverse impact on our returns on equity and reduce our liquidity. If any of these events occur, our cash flows would be reduced, preventing us from deploying our equity capital in an optimal manner. If we are unable to refinance debt incurred to finance our loans and our operations, we also may have to forego other investment opportunities that require equity and our liquidity may be diminished.
Current wording
We may be unable to maintain or refinance debt incurred to finance our investments and our operations, thereby increasing the amount of equity capital risk we bear with respect to particular investments or preventing us from deploying our equity capital in the optimal manner. If we are unable to maintain or refinance such debt at appropriate times, we may be required to sell assets at a loss or on terms that are not advantageous to us or take action that could result in other negative consequences. We may only be able to partly replace or refinance such debt if underwriting standards, including loan-to-value ratios and yield requirements, among other requirements, are stricter than when we originally financed our investments. Additionally, as a result of economic headwinds, certain of our borrowers may request term extensions, and we may not be able to maintain or obtain corresponding match-term financing or in certain cases obtain required approvals from our financing counterparties. Obtaining such approvals has required in the past and may require in the future reduction of advance rates on financings, increased borrowing costs, increasing recourse or a combination thereof, which could have an adverse impact on our returns on equity and reduce our liquidity. If any of these events occur, our cash flows would be reduced, preventing us from deploying our equity capital in an optimal manner. If we are unable to refinance debt incurred to finance our investments and our operations, we also may have to forego other investment opportunities that require equity and our liquidity may be diminished.
Previous wording
As a result of our real estate owned investments, we are subject to the risks commonly associated with real estate owned holdings, including risks related to ownership of a hotel portfolio and a mixed-use property in New York, NY, which differ from the risks associated with lending.
Current wording
As a result of our real estate owned assets, we are subject to the risks commonly associated with real estate owned holdings, including risks related to ownership of a hotel portfolio and a mixed-use property in New York, NY, which differ from the risks associated with lending.
Previous wording
Borrowers under our loans may not have sufficient financial resources to satisfy their payment obligations to us, and we could be required to take ownership of the assets underlying a particular loan in lieu of full repayment of the principal amount and accrued interest on the loan. For example, in February 2021, we foreclosed on a portfolio of seven limited service hotels located in New York, NY. Prior to the foreclosure, the hotel portfolio represented the collateral for a mezzanine loan held by us with an unpaid principal balance of $103.9 million and a securitized senior mortgage with an unpaid principal balance of $300.0 million held by third parties. As such, we are subject to the risks commonly associated with real estate owned holdings, including risks related to ownership of a hotel portfolio and mixed-use property both located in New York, NY, which include changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area, changes in interest rates and availability and terms of permanent mortgage financing that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive, political instability or changes in prevailing policies, decreases in property values, changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws and the risk of uninsured or underinsured casualty loss. Further, our equity interest in our current, or any future, real estate owned investment is subordinate to any indebtedness secured by such property. To the extent that we decide or are required to take ownership of one or more additional properties, these risks will be heightened. Real estate owned investments are illiquid investments and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any real estate owned investment for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a real estate owned investment. We may acquire properties that are subject to contractual “lock-out” provisions that could restrict our ability to dispose of the real estate owned investment for a period of time. In addition, U.S. federal tax laws that impose a 100% excise tax on gains from sales of dealer property by a REIT (generally, property held-for-sale, rather than investment) could limit our ability to sell properties and may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders. These characteristics and restrictions could result in losses that would adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Current wording
Borrowers under our loans may not have sufficient financial resources to satisfy their payment obligations to us, and we could be required to take ownership of the assets underlying a particular loan in lieu of full repayment of the principal amount and accrued interest on the loan. For example, in February 2021, we foreclosed on a portfolio of seven limited service hotels located in New York, NY. Prior to the foreclosure, the hotel portfolio represented the collateral for a mezzanine loan held by us with an unpaid principal balance of $103.9 million and a securitized senior mortgage with an unpaid principal balance of $300.0 million held by third parties. As such, we are subject to the risks commonly associated with real estate owned holdings, including risks related to ownership of a hotel portfolio and mixed-use property both located in New York, NY, which include changes in general or local economic conditions, changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area, changes in interest rates and availability and terms of permanent mortgage financing that may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive, political instability or changes in prevailing policies, decreases in property values, changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws and the risk of uninsured or underinsured casualty loss. Further, our equity interest in our current, or any future, real estate owned asset is subordinate to any indebtedness secured by such property. To the extent that we decide or are required to take ownership of one or more additional properties, these risks will be heightened. Real estate owned assets are illiquid investments and we may be unable to adjust our portfolio in response to changes in economic or other conditions. In addition, the real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, availability of financing, interest rates and other factors, including supply and demand, that are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any real estate owned assets for the price or on the terms set by us, or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a real estate owned asset. We may acquire properties that are subject to contractual “lock-out” provisions that could restrict our ability to dispose of the real estate owned asset for a period of time. In addition, U.S. federal tax laws that impose a 100% excise tax on gains from sales of dealer property by a REIT (generally, property held-for-sale, rather than investment) could limit our ability to sell properties and may affect our ability to sell properties without adversely affecting returns to our stockholders. These characteristics and restrictions could result in losses that would adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous wording
We may also be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a real estate owned investment can be sold. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience increased operating costs and taxes in connection with our real estate owned investment, including costs related to owning a real estate owned investment in a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). If the real estate owned investment is owned by our TRS, income from the investment generally will be subject to corporate income tax. We cannot assure stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects, to make such improvements or to pay these operating costs. In acquiring a real estate owned investment, we may agree or otherwise become subject to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that real estate owned investment for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that real estate owned investment. These risks vary from the risks associated with lending and could materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
We may also be required to expend funds to correct defects or to make improvements before a real estate owned asset can be sold. We have experienced and expect to continue to experience increased operating costs and taxes in connection with our real estate owned assets, including costs related to owning a real estate owned asset in a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). If the real estate owned asset is owned by our TRS, income from the investment generally will be subject to corporate income tax. We cannot assure stockholders that we will have funds available to correct such defects, to make such improvements or to pay these operating costs. In acquiring a real estate owned asset, we may agree or otherwise become subject to restrictions that prohibit the sale of that real estate owned asset for a period of time or impose other restrictions, such as a limitation on the amount of debt that can be placed or repaid on that real estate owned asset. These risks vary from the risks associated with lending and could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
We calculate the LTV for a loan in our portfolio as our total loan commitment from time to time, as if fully funded, plus any financings that are pari passu with or senior to our loan, divided by our estimate of either (1) the value of the underlying real estate, determined in accordance with our underwriting process (typically consistent with, if not less than, the value set forth in a third-party appraisal) or (2) the borrower’s projected, fully funded cost basis in the asset, in each case as we deem appropriate for the relevant loan and other loans with similar characteristics. Underwritten values and projected costs should not be assumed to reflect our judgment of current market values or project costs, which may have changed materially since the date of origination. LTV is updated only in connection with a partial loan paydown and/or release of collateral, material changes to expected project costs, the receipt of a new appraisal (typically in connection with financing or refinancing activity) or a change in our loan commitment. Because the LTV is determined as of the date of origination, the LTVs for our loans generally do not take into account post-origination changes in our borrowers’ business operations or creditworthiness, or in the value of our underlying real estate collateral, as a result of changing economic conditions or otherwise. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the LTV of our portfolio that we present in this report (i.e., our portfolio weighted average LTV of 69.2% as of December 31, 2023) is reflective of current LTV of our portfolio or the amount of subordinate value available in the event we foreclose on a loan.
Current wording
We calculate the LTV for a loan in our portfolio upon origination, which represents “loan-to-value” or “loan-to-cost”, as our total loan commitment upon origination, as if fully funded, plus any financings that are pari passu with or senior to our loan, divided by our estimate of either (1) the value of the underlying real estate, determined in accordance with our underwriting process (typically consistent with, if not less than, the value set forth in a third-party appraisal) or (2) the borrower’s projected, fully funded cost basis in the asset, in each case as we deem appropriate for the relevant loan and other loans with similar characteristics. Underwritten values and projected costs should not be assumed to reflect our judgment of current market values or project costs, which may have changed materially since the date of origination. Furthermore, we calculate adjusted LTV whereby origination LTV is updated only in connection with a partial loan paydown and/or release of collateral, material changes to expected project costs, the receipt of a new appraisal (typically in connection with financing or refinancing activity) or a change in our loan commitment. Adjusted LTV should not be assumed to reflect our judgment or current market values or project costs, which may have changed materially since the date of the most recent determination of LTV. Origination LTV and adjusted LTV for our loans generally do not take into account post-origination changes in our borrowers’ business operations or creditworthiness, or in the value of our underlying real estate collateral (except in circumstances of receipt of a new appraisal), as a result of changing economic conditions or otherwise.
Previous wording
If a borrower fails to complete the construction of a project or experiences cost overruns, there could be adverse consequences associated with the loan, including a loss of the value of the property underlying the loan, a borrower claim against us for failure to perform under the loan documents if we choose to stop funding, increased costs to the borrower that the borrower is unable to pay, a bankruptcy filing by the borrower, and abandonment by the borrower of the property underlying the loan. Furthermore, construction projects have faced delays, including as a result of disruptions in supply chains, cost increases associated with building materials and construction services necessary for construction, and delays and costs associated with obtaining construction permits and complying with local regulations, all of which can result in cost overruns to complete such projects. During periods of capital market disruptions, replacement financing may not be available to the borrower which in turn, may result in the borrower’s inability to repay our loan in full. The failure of a borrower to complete construction, these cost overruns or other related impacts, and the lack of availability of replacement financing, could materially and adversely effect on us.
Current wording
If a borrower fails to complete the construction of a project or experiences cost overruns, there could be adverse consequences associated with the loan, including a loss of the value of the property underlying the loan, a borrower claim against us for failure to perform under the loan documents if we choose to stop funding, increased costs to the borrower that the borrower is unable to pay, a bankruptcy filing by the borrower, and abandonment by the borrower of the property underlying the loan. Furthermore, construction projects have faced delays, including as a result of disruptions in supply chains and labor markets, cost increases associated with building materials and construction services necessary for construction, and delays and costs associated with obtaining construction permits and complying with local regulations, all of which can result in cost overruns to complete such projects. During periods of capital market disruptions, replacement financing may not be available to the borrower, which in turn, may result in the borrower’s inability to repay our loan in full. The failure of a borrower to complete construction, these cost overruns or other related impacts, and the lack of availability of replacement financing, could materially and adversely effect on us.
Previous wording
U.S. and global financial systems have undergone significant disruption, and such disruption may negatively impact our ability to execute our investment strategy, which would materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
U.S. and global financial systems and economies have undergone significant disruption, and such disruption and future disruptions may negatively impact our ability and our borrowers’ abilities to execute investment strategies, which would materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
In recent years, the U.S. and global financial markets have undergone significant disruptions beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic, and continuing with supply-demand imbalances, rapid increases in inflation which required central bank action and resulted in significantly increased short term interest rates, changes in the employment market and employer practices (including remote work), geopolitical tensions forcing changes in supply chains and international trade partnerships, and general economic uncertainty, the full ramifications of which are not yet known but could continue to materially and adversely affect us. These markets have also experienced significant disruptions in the past, during which times global capital markets collapsed, borrowers defaulted on their loans at historically high levels, banks and other lending institutions suffered heavy losses and the value of certain classes of real estate declined. During such periods, a significant number of borrowers became unable to pay principal and interest on outstanding loans as the value of their real estate declined. Declining real estate values could reduce the level of new senior and subordinate loan originations. Instability in the U.S. and global financial markets in the future could be caused by any number of factors beyond our control, including, without limitation, pandemics, terrorist attacks or other acts of war or military activities, prolonged civil unrest, political instability or uncertainty, including the military conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas, and other conflicts throughout the Middle East and North Africa more broadly, some of which may impact global supply chains, tensions involving Russia, China, and Iran, or broad-based sanctions, should they continue for the long term or escalate, and adverse changes in national or international economic, market and political conditions. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect both our net interest income from loans in our portfolio as well as our ability to execute our investment strategy, which would materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
In recent years, the U.S. and global financial systems and economies have undergone and may continue to undergo significant disruptions beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic, and continuing with supply-demand imbalances, rapid increases in inflation which required central bank action and resulted in significantly increased short term interest rates, changes in the employment market and employer practices (including remote work), geopolitical tensions forcing changes in supply chains, international trade partnerships and immigration policies, deglobalization trends, and general economic uncertainty, the full ramifications of which are not yet known but could continue to materially and adversely affect us and our borrowers. Further, we cannot predict the ultimate timing, direction or extent of legislative, regulatory, and other actions under the new administration and congress, the effect of which could have a material impact on our business, results of operations, and financial conditions and that of our borrowers. These markets have also experienced significant disruptions in the past, during which times global capital markets collapsed, borrowers defaulted on their loans at historically high levels, banks and other lending institutions suffered heavy losses and the value of certain classes of real estate declined. During such periods, a significant number of borrowers became unable to pay principal and interest on outstanding loans as the value of their real estate declined. Declining real estate values could reduce the level of new senior and subordinate loan originations. Instability in the U.S. and global financial systems and economies in the future could be caused by any number of factors beyond our control, including, without limitation, deglobalization trends, legislative and regulatory uncertainty, pandemics, terrorist attacks or other acts of war or military activities, prolonged civil unrest, political instability or uncertainty, including the military conflicts between Russia and Ukraine, Israel and Hamas, and other conflicts throughout the Middle East and North Africa more broadly, some of which may impact global supply chains, tensions involving Russia, China, and Iran, or broad-based sanctions, should they continue for the long term or escalate, and adverse changes in national or international economic, market and political conditions. Any sustained period of increased payment delinquencies, foreclosures or losses could adversely affect both our net interest income from loans in our portfolio as well as our ability to execute our investment strategy, which would materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code, or Treasury Regulations, and environmental legislation;
Current wording
changes in governmental rules, regulations and fiscal policies, including Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code, or Treasury Regulations, and environmental legislation;
Previous wording
Recent macroeconomic trends, including recent increases in inflation and interest rates, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Recent macroeconomic trends, including inflationary pressures and fluctuations in benchmark interest rates, may adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Throughout 2023, inflation in the United States moderated, though has not yet reached levels commensurate with the U.S. Federal Reserve’s long-term target. In response to this recent inflationary pressure, the U.S. Federal Reserve and other global central banks raised interest rates in 2022 and 2023. The moderation of inflation in the United States in 2023 has made the likelihood of further interest rate increases less likely while increasing the likelihood of interest rate cuts in 2024. The amount and timing of any such rate cuts remains uncertain. Inflation above the U.S. Federal Reserve’s long-term target and monetary policy adjustments (i.e., higher interest rates) made in response could have an adverse impact on any floating rate debt we have incurred and may incur in the future, and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could increase at a rate higher than our interest income and other revenue. Further, to the extent our borrowing costs increase faster than the interest income earned from our floating-rate loans, such increases may adversely affect our cash flows, our ability to meet the financial covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness, or our ability to refinance maturing debt as it comes due. In addition, such above-target inflation and any commensurate adjustments to monetary policy may materially and adversely impact the ability of our borrowers to make required payments on our loans.
Current wording
In early 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve began a campaign to combat inflationary pressures by increasing interest rates, ultimately resulting in benchmark interest rates increasing by 5.25% by the end of 2023. Although the U.S. Federal Reserve has reduced benchmark interest rates in recent months as a result of moderating inflation pressures, such benchmark rates remain high relative to recent historical standards. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve has indicated that further changes in benchmark interest rates are dependent upon changes in prices and employment markets. The timing, direction, and extent of any future adjustment to benchmark interest rates by the U.S. Federal Reserve remain uncertain. Inflation above the U.S. Federal Reserve’s long-term target could have an adverse impact on any floating rate debt we have incurred and may incur in the future, and our general and administrative expenses, as these costs could remain high or further increase at a rate higher than our interest income and other revenue. Further, to the extent our borrowing costs remain high or further increase faster than the interest income earned from our floating-rate loans, such increases may adversely affect our cash flows, our ability to meet the financial covenants in the agreements governing our indebtedness, or our ability to refinance maturing debt as it comes due. In addition, such above-target inflation and high benchmark interest rates relative to recent historical standards may materially and adversely impact the ability of our borrowers to make required payments on our loans. Conversely, in a period of declining interest rates, the interest income on floating rate investments would decline, while any decline in the interest we are charged on our floating rate debt may not equal or exceed the decrease in interest income and the interest expense we incur.
Previous wording
Provisions for credit losses are difficult to estimate.
Current wording
Provisions for current expected credit loss reserve are difficult to estimate.
Previous wording
Our provision for credit losses is evaluated on a quarterly basis. The determination of our provision for credit losses requires us to make certain estimates and judgments, which may be difficult to determine. Our estimates and judgments are based on a number of factors, including historical loan loss reference data, projected cash flow to and from the collateral securing our loans, loan structures, including the availability of reserves and recourse guarantees, likelihood of repayment in full at the maturity of a loan, potential for refinancing, and expected market discount rates and collateral value for varying property types, and expectations of performance and market conditions, all of which remain uncertain and are subjective. Our estimates and judgments may not be correct and, therefore, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.
Current wording
Our provisions for current expected credit loss reserve are evaluated on a quarterly basis. The determination of our provision for credit losses requires us to make certain estimates and judgments, which may be difficult to determine. Our estimates and judgments are based on a number of factors, including historical loan loss reference data from a comparable data set, the overall economic environment, real estate sector, the geographic sub-market in which the borrower operates, performance and/or value of the underlying collateral property, the financial and operating capability of the borrower/sponsor, the financial strength of loan guarantors, if any, loan positions senior to ours, the risk rating of a loan, whether a loan is a construction loan and whether the loan’s initial maturity is near-term. Furthermore, in certain circumstances, we may estimate the fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral property to determine our provision for credit loss, which may include assumptions of property specific cash flows over estimated holding periods, property redevelopment costs, leasing activities, discount rates, and market and terminal capitalization rates, all of which remain uncertain and are subjective. Our estimates and judgments may not be correct and, therefore, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely impacted.
Previous wording
We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the loans we originate or acquire in order to preserve our investment. Any foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. Among the expenses that are likely to occur in any foreclosure would be the incurrence of substantial legal fees and potentially significant transfer taxes. If we foreclose on an asset, we may take title to the property securing that asset subject to any debt and debt service requirements then in effect, which was the case for the foreclosure resulting in our real estate owned investment. As a result, we cannot assure you that the value of the collateral underlying a foreclosed loan at or after the time a foreclosure is contemplated or completed will exceed our investment, including related foreclosure expenses and assumed indebtedness, or that operating cash flows from such investment will exceed debt service requirements, if any. As a result, a contemplated or completed foreclosure could result in significant losses. If we do not or cannot sell a foreclosed property, we would then come to own and operate it as “real estate owned.” Owning and operating real property, such as our real estate owned investments, involves risks that are different (and in many ways more significant) than the risks faced in lending against a CRE asset.
Current wording
We may find it necessary or desirable to foreclose on certain of the loans we originate or acquire in order to preserve our investment. Any foreclosure process may be lengthy and expensive. Among the expenses that are likely to occur in any foreclosure would be the incurrence of substantial legal fees and potentially significant transfer taxes. If we foreclose on an asset, we may take title to the property securing that asset subject to any debt and debt service requirements then in effect, which was the case for the foreclosure resulting in our real estate owned asset. As a result, we cannot assure you that the value of the collateral underlying a foreclosed loan at or after the time a foreclosure is contemplated or completed will exceed our investment, including related foreclosure expenses and assumed indebtedness, or that operating cash flows from such investment will exceed debt service requirements, if any. As a result, a contemplated or completed foreclosure could result in significant losses. If we do not or cannot sell a foreclosed property, we would then come to own and operate it as “real estate owned.” Owning and operating real property, such as our real estate owned assets, involves risks that are different (and in many ways more significant) than the risks faced in lending against a CRE asset.
Previous wording
We have a significant amount of debt outstanding and may incur a significant amount of additional debt in the future, which subjects us to increased risk of loss, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
We may incur additional debt in the future, which subjects us to increased risk of loss, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
As of December 31, 2023, we had approximately $5.7 billion in consolidated indebtedness outstanding. In the future, subject to market conditions and availability, we may incur significant additional debt through repurchase agreements, asset-specific financing structures, and secured term loan borrowings. In addition to these types of financings, we may also use other forms of leverage, including secured and unsecured credit arrangements, structured financings such as CMBS and CLOs, derivative instruments, public and private secured and unsecured debt issuances by us or our subsidiaries.
Current wording
In the future, subject to market conditions and availability, we may incur additional debt through repurchase agreements, asset-specific financing structures, and secured term loan borrowings. In addition to these types of financings, we may also use other forms of leverage, including but not limited to secured and unsecured credit arrangements, structured financings such as CMBS and CLOs, derivative instruments, public and private secured and unsecured debt issuances by us or our subsidiaries.
Previous wording
A significant amount of debt subjects us to many risks that, if realized, would materially and adversely affect us, including the risk that:
Current wording
Additional debt subjects us to many risks that, if realized, would materially and adversely affect us, including the risk that:
Previous wording
our cash flow from operating activities could become insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest on our debt, which would likely result in (a) acceleration of the debt (and any other debt containing a cross-default or cross-acceleration provision), increasing the likelihood of further distress if refinancing is not available on favorable terms or at all, (b) our inability to borrow undrawn amounts under other existing financing arrangements, even if we have timely made all required payments under such arrangements, further compromising our liquidity, and/or (c) the loss of some or all of our assets that are pledged as collateral in connection with our financing arrangements (including assets transferred to lenders under repurchase agreements);
Current wording
our cash flow from operating and investing activities could become insufficient to make required payments of principal and interest on our debt, which would likely result in (a) acceleration of the debt (and any other debt containing a cross-default or cross-acceleration provision), increasing the likelihood of further distress if refinancing is not available on favorable terms or at all, (b) our inability to borrow undrawn amounts under other existing financing arrangements, even if we have timely made all required payments under such arrangements, further compromising our liquidity, and/or (c) the loss of some or all of our assets that are pledged as collateral in connection with our financing arrangements (including assets transferred to lenders under repurchase agreements);
Previous wording
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operating activities to payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, future business opportunities, stockholder distributions and/or other purposes;
Current wording
we may be required to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operating and investing activities to payments on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for operations, future business opportunities, stockholder distributions and/or other purposes;
Previous wording
Our secured term loan, debt related to real estate owned, current financing facilities, derivative instruments, and secured loans impose, and additional lending facilities may impose, financial and other covenants that restrict our operational flexibility, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Current wording
Our secured term loan, debt related to real estate owned, current financing facilities, derivative instruments, and secured loans contain, and additional lending facilities may contain, financial and other covenants that restrict our operational flexibility, which could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
Our secured term loan, debt related to real estate owned, current financing facilities, derivative instruments, and secured loans contain, and additional financing facilities may contain various customary covenants, including requiring us to meet or maintain certain financial ratios or other requirements that restrict our operational flexibility, including restrictions on dividends, distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries, and impede certain investments that we might otherwise make. In addition, certain of our existing lenders and counterparties require us to maintain minimum amounts of cash liquidity of not less than the greater of (x) $50 million or (y) 5% of our recourse indebtedness, which may also be required by future lenders or counterparties. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of $187.3 million and $306.5 million, respectively. There can be no assurance that we will be able to maintain the required minimum amounts of cash liquidity going forward. In addition, as a result of the requirement to maintain a minimum amount of cash liquidity, we may not be able to leverage our assets as fully as we would otherwise choose, which could reduce our liquidity and returns on equity. If we are unable to meet these financial covenants, it could materially and adversely affect us. For the quarters ended or ending December 31, 2023 and March 31, 2024, we modified certain of our EBITDA to interest charges covenants to provide for a minimum ratio of 1.3 to 1.0 for such covenants which previously required a minimum ratio of 1.4 to 1.0. Future compliance with our financial covenants is dependent upon the results of our operating activities, our financial condition, and the overall market conditions in which we and our borrowers operate. As market conditions evolve, we may work with our counterparties to request modifications of financial covenants as needed. In addition, certain of our existing lenders require, and future lenders may require, us to agree that we would be in default if our Manager or one or more of its executive officers cease to serve in such capacity for any reason. If we fail to satisfy any of these covenants, such that a default arises, our lenders may be entitled to enforce remedies such as declaring outstanding amounts due and payable, terminating their commitments, requiring the posting of additional collateral and/or enforcing their security interests against existing collateral, unless we were able to negotiate a waiver, forbearance or other modification. Any such arrangement could be conditioned on an amendment to the lending or repurchase agreement and any related guarantee agreement on terms that may be unfavorable to us. Certain of our financings are, and may also in the future, contain cross-default and/or cross-acceleration provisions with respect to our other debt agreements or facilities. Any such provision could allow a financing counterparty to declare a default because of a def…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Current wording
Future compliance with our financial covenants is dependent upon the results of our operating activities, our financial condition, and the overall market conditions in which we and our borrowers operate. The impact of macroeconomic conditions on the commercial real estate and capital markets, including high benchmark interest rates compared to recent historical standards, may make it more difficult for us to satisfy these covenants in the future and ultimately reduce our liquidity and returns on equity. Non-compliance with financial covenants may result in our lenders exercising their rights and remedies as provided for in the respective agreements, which could materially and adversely affect us. As market conditions evolve, we may continue to work with our counterparties on modifying financial covenants as needed; however, there is no assurance that our counterparties will agree to such modifications. If we fail to satisfy any of these covenants, such that a default arises, our lenders may be entitled to enforce remedies such as declaring outstanding amounts due and payable, terminating their commitments, requiring the posting of additional collateral and/or enforcing their security interests against existing collateral, unless we were able to negotiate a waiver, forbearance or other modification. Any such arrangement could be conditioned on an amendment to the lending or repurchase agreement and any related guarantee agreement on terms that may be unfavorable to us. Certain of our financings are, and may also in the future, contain cross-default and/or cross-acceleration provisions with respect to our other debt agreements or facilities. Any such provision could allow a financing counterparty to declare a default because of a default or acceleration under a financing arrangement with a different financing counterparty. This would create defaults across multiple financings resulting from a single event. This and any other type of default could make it difficult for us to satisfy the requirements necessary to maintain our qualification as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as liquidity generated from operating cash flow is transferred to our lenders rather than distributed to our stockholders. As a result, a default on any of our debt could materially and adversely affect us.
Previous wording
We and our secured term loan are currently rated by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service and our secured term loan is also rated. Our and our secured term loan credit ratings could change based upon, among other things, our historical and projected business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and prospects. Our issuer and senior secured debt credit ratings have in the past fluctuated, and currently have ratings of B+ (stable) from Standard and Poor’s and Ba3 (stable) from Moody’s Investors Service. These ratings actions or any future downgrade, or withdrawal of a rating or any credit rating agency action that indicates that it has placed our rating on a “watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering, or otherwise indicates that its outlook for our rating is negative, could increase our borrowing costs and our ability to access capital on favorable terms or at all and otherwise adversely affect us. Our ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies, and we cannot assure you that any ratings will not be changed adversely or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant.
Current wording
We and our secured term loan are currently rated by Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s Investors Service and our secured term loan is also rated. Our and our secured term loan credit ratings could change based upon, among other things, our historical and projected business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and prospects. Our issuer and senior secured debt credit ratings have in the past fluctuated, and currently have ratings of B- (negative) from Standard and Poor’s and B1 (stable) from Moody’s Investors Service. These ratings actions or any future downgrade, or withdrawal of a rating or any credit rating agency action that indicates that it has placed our rating on a “watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering, or otherwise indicates that its outlook for our rating is negative, could increase our borrowing costs and our ability to access capital on favorable terms or at all and otherwise adversely affect us. Our ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies, and we cannot assure you that any ratings will not be changed adversely or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in its judgment, circumstances warrant.
Previous wording
Further, any downgrade of the Company’s credit ratings by any of the credit agencies that cover our debt may make it more difficult and costly for us to access capital. There can be no assurances that our credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future, whether as a result of deteriorating general economic conditions, failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the adverse impact on our results of operations or liquidity position of any of the above, or otherwise.
Current wording
Further, any downgrade of our credit ratings by any of the credit agencies that cover our debt may make it more difficult and costly for us to access capital. There can be no assurances that our credit ratings will not be downgraded in the future, whether as a result of deteriorating general economic conditions, failure to successfully implement our operating strategy or the adverse impact on our results of operations or liquidity position of any of the above, or otherwise.
Previous wording
Our primary interest rate exposures relate to the yield on our investments and the financing cost of our debt, as well as our exposure to interest rate swaps that we may utilize for hedging purposes either with respect to our investments or our indebtedness. Changes in interest rates affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning investments and the interest expense we incur in financing these investments. In a period of rising interest rates, our interest expense on floating rate debt would increase, while any additional interest income we earn on floating rate investments may not equal or exceed the increase in interest expense. The interest earned on investments and incurred on debt that carry a fixed rate would not change. In a period of declining interest rates, the interest income on floating rate investments would decline, while any decline in the interest we are charged on our floating rate debt may not equal or exceed the decrease in interest income and the interest expense we incur. As noted above, the interest earned on investments and incurred on debt that carry a fixed rate would not change. Certain of our financings may have interest rate floors, which if the index rate were to fall below such floor our interest expense would essentially remain fixed. Consequently, changes in interest rates may significantly influence our net interest income. Interest rate fluctuations resulting in our interest expense exceeding interest income would result in operating losses, which could materially and adversely affect us. Changes in the level of interest rates also may affect our ability to originate or acquire investments, the value of our investments and our ability to realize gains from the disposition of assets. Increases in interest rates and credit spreads may also negatively affect demand for loans and could result in higher borrower default rates. In 2022 and 2023, the U.S. Federal Reserve raised benchmark overnight interest rates to combat increases in inflation. More recently, inflation has moderated and the U.S. Federal Reserve has indicated that additional increases have become less likely and the potential for decreases in interest rates are more likely, though it is impossible to know if, when and by how much the U.S. Federal Reserve will reduce interest rates in 2024. For more information regarding changes in interest rates affecting borrower default rates, please see “—Prepayment rates may adversely affect the yield on our loans and the value of our portfolio of assets.”
Current wording
Our primary interest rate exposures relate to the yield on our investments and the financing cost of our debt, as well as our exposure to interest rate swaps that we may utilize for hedging purposes either with respect to our investments or our indebtedness. Changes in interest rates affect our net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income we earn on our interest-earning investments and the interest expense we incur in financing these investments. In a period of rising interest rates, our interest expense on floating rate debt would increase, while any additional interest income we earn on floating rate investments may not equal or exceed the increase in interest expense. The interest earned on investments and incurred on debt that carry a fixed rate would not change. In a period of declining interest rates, the interest income on floating rate investments would decline, while any decline in the interest we are charged on our floating rate debt may not equal or exceed the decrease in interest income and the interest expense we incur. As noted above, the interest earned on investments and incurred on debt that carry a fixed rate would not change. Certain of our financings may have interest rate floors, which if the index rate were to fall below such floor our interest expense would essentially remain fixed. Consequently, changes in interest rates may significantly influence our net interest income. Interest rate fluctuations resulting in our interest expense exceeding interest income would result in operating losses, which could materially and adversely affect us. Changes in the level of interest rates also may affect our ability to originate or acquire investments, the value of our investments and our ability to realize gains from the disposition of assets. Increases in interest rates and credit spreads may also negatively affect demand for loans and could result in higher borrower default rates. In early 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve began a campaign to combat inflationary pressures by increasing interest rates, ultimately resulting in benchmark interest rates increasing by 5.25% by the end of 2023. Although the U.S. Federal Reserve has reduced benchmark interest rates in recent months as a result of moderating inflation pressures, such benchmark rates remain high relative to recent historical standards. Additionally, the U.S. Federal Reserve has indicated that further changes in benchmark interest rates are dependent upon changes in prices and employment markets. The timing, direction, and extent of any future adjustment to benchmark interest rates by the U.S. Federal Reserve remain uncertain. For more information regarding changes in interest rates affecting borrower default rates, please see “—Prepayment rates may adversely affect the yield on our loans and the value of our portfolio of assets.”
Previous wording
We attempt to structure our financings to minimize any mismatch between the type of interest rate of our investments and the interest rate of related financings—financing floating rate investments with floating rate financing and fixed rate investments with fixed rate financing. Further, we work to match reference rates on floating rate liabilities used to finance floating rate assets. If such a rate-type matched product is not then available to us on favorable terms, we may use hedging instruments to effectively create such a match. For example, in the case of fixed rate investments, we may finance investments with floating rate financing, but effectively convert all or a portion of the attendant financing to fixed rate using hedging strategies. We routinely use SOFR floors on both our investments and our debt financings, with the SOFR floors of our financings typically lower than the SOFR floors for our investments.
Current wording
We attempt to structure our financings to minimize any mismatch between the type of interest rate of our investments and the interest rate of related financings—financing floating rate investments with floating rate financing and fixed rate investments with fixed rate financing. Further, we work to match reference rates on floating rate liabilities used to finance floating rate assets. If such a rate-type matched product is not then available to us on favorable terms, we may use hedging instruments to effectively create such a match. For example, in the case of fixed rate investments, we may finance investments with floating rate financing, but effectively convert all or a portion of the attendant financing to fixed rate using hedging strategies. We routinely use one-month Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) floors on both our investments and our debt financings, with the SOFR floors of our financings typically lower than the SOFR floors for our investments.
Previous wording
An increase in our borrowing costs relative to the interest that we receive on our leveraged assets would adversely affect our profitability and our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Current wording
An increase in our borrowing costs relative to the interest that we receive on our leveraged loans and revenues that we receive on our levered real estate owned assets would adversely affect our profitability and our cash available for distribution to our stockholders.
Previous wording
As certain borrowings mature, we may need to replace such borrowings with new financings, find other sources of liquidity or sell assets. As borrowing rates have increased from recent and historically low levels, at the time we enter into new borrowings, the spread between the returns on our investments and the cost of our borrowings may be reduced. In addition, there is no assurance that short-term interest rates may not increase further. Although the U.S. Federal Reserve has indicated that it currently plans to lower interest rates in 2024, it is impossible to know the trajectory of interest rates. Any increase in interest rates could adversely affect the return on our assets, which might reduce our earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to our stockholders, potentially materially.
Current wording
As certain borrowings mature, we may need to replace such borrowings with new financings, find other sources of liquidity or sell assets. As borrowing rates have increased from recent and historically low levels, at the time we enter into new borrowings, the spread between the returns on our investments and the cost of our borrowings may be reduced. In addition, there is no assurance that short-term interest rates may not increase further. Although the U.S. Federal Reserve has reduced benchmark interest rates in recent months, the timing, direction, and extent of any future adjustment to benchmark interest rates remain uncertain. Any increase in interest rates could adversely affect the return on our assets, which might reduce our earnings and, in turn, cash available for distribution to our stockholders, potentially materially.
Previous wording
Though our primary strategy is to originate and acquire shorter term, floating rate loans, our investments may include loans with either floating interest rates or fixed interest rates. Floating rate investments earn interest at rates that adjust from time to time (typically monthly) based upon an index (typically one-month SOFR). The coupons earned by the floating rate loans fluctuate based upon interest rate reference indices (again, typically one-month SOFR) and, in a declining and/or low interest rate environment, these loans will earn lower rates of interest and this will impact our operating performance. Fixed interest rate investments, however, do not have adjusting interest rates and the relative value of the fixed cash flows from these investments will decrease as prevailing interest rates rise or increase as prevailing interest rates fall, causing potentially significant changes in value. We may employ various hedging strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates (and in some cases credit spreads), including engaging in interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate derivative products. We believe that no strategy can completely insulate us from the risks associated with interest rate changes and there is a risk that they may provide no protection at all. Hedging transactions involve certain additional risks such as counterparty risk, leverage risk, the legal enforceability of hedging contracts, the early repayment of hedged transactions and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates may cause a significant loss of basis in the contract and a change in current period expense. Furthermore, entering into hedging transactions may require certain levels of liquidity which may impact our ability to meet funding requirements necessary to meet our commitments to our borrowers and financing counterparties. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to enter into hedging transactions or that hedging transactions will adequately protect us against the foregoing risks.
Current wording
Though our primary strategy is to originate and acquire shorter term, floating rate loans, our investments may include loans with either floating interest rates or fixed interest rates. Floating rate investments earn interest at rates that adjust from time to time (typically monthly) based upon an index (typically SOFR). The coupons earned by the floating rate loans fluctuate based upon interest rate reference indices (again, typically SOFR) and, in a declining and/or low interest rate environment, these loans will earn lower rates of interest and this will impact our operating performance. Fixed interest rate investments, however, do not have adjusting interest rates and the relative value of the fixed cash flows from these investments will decrease as prevailing interest rates rise or increase as prevailing interest rates fall, causing potentially significant changes in value. We may employ various hedging strategies to limit the effects of changes in interest rates (and in some cases credit spreads), including engaging in interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate derivative products. We believe that no strategy can completely insulate us from the risks associated with interest rate changes and there is a risk that they may provide no protection at all. Hedging transactions involve certain additional risks such as counterparty risk, leverage risk, the legal enforceability of hedging contracts, the early repayment of hedged transactions and the risk that unanticipated and significant changes in interest rates may cause a significant loss of basis in the contract and a change in current period expense. Furthermore, entering into hedging transactions may require certain levels of liquidity which may impact our ability to meet funding requirements necessary to meet our commitments to our borrowers and financing counterparties. We cannot make assurances that we will be able to enter into hedging transactions or that hedging transactions will adequately protect us against the foregoing risks.
Showing the first 40 of 54 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (4)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the origination LTV or adjusted LTV of our portfolio that we present in this report is reflective of current LTV of our portfolio or the amount of subordinate value available in the event we foreclose on a loan.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Our secured term loan, debt related to real estate owned, current financing facilities, derivative instruments, and secured loans contain, and additional financing facilities may contain, various customary financial and other covenants, including requiring us to meet or maintain certain financial ratios or other requirements that restrict our operational flexibility, including restrictions on dividends, distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries, and impede certain investments that we might otherwise make.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
– that circumvent security controls, evade detection and remove forensic evidence. As a result, we or our Sponsor may be unable to detect, investigate, remediate or recover from future attacks or incidents, or to avoid a material adverse impact to our information systems, confidential information or business.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
From time to time we may own interests in one or more TRSs. A TRS is a corporation other than a REIT in which a REIT directly or indirectly holds stock, and that has made a joint election with such REIT to be treated as a TRS. If a TRS owns more than 35% of the total voting power or value of the outstanding securities of another corporation, such other corporation will also be treated as a TRS.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
such as certain government-related entities and charitable remainder trusts that are not subject to tax on unrelated business taxable income, or UBTI, we may incur a corporate-level tax on a portion of any excess inclusion income. Moreover, we could face limitations in selling equity interests in these securitizations to outside investors, or selling any debt securities issued in connection with these securitizations that might be considered to be equity interests for tax purposes. These limitations may prevent us from using certain techniques to maximize our returns from securitization transactions.