WILSON BANK HOLDING CO

As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive compensation actually paid and certain financial performance of the Company. For further information concerning the Company’s variable pay-for-performance philosophy and how the Company’s aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.” The Personnel Committee and Board of Directors did not consider the pay-versus-performance disclosures below when making their pay decisions for any of the years shown.

(1)

The dollar amounts reported in column (b) are the amounts of total compensation reported for Mr. McDearman (our Chief Executive Officer) for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table.

(2)

The dollar amounts reported in column (c) represent the amount of “compensation actually paid” to Mr. McDearman, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid Mr. McDearman during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to Mr. McDearman’s total compensation for each year to determine the compensation actually paid:

(a)

The grant date fair value of equity awards represents the total of the amounts reported in the “Stock Awards” and “Option Awards” columns in the Summary Compensation Table for the applicable year, and these values are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

(b)

The equity award adjustments for each applicable year include the addition (or subtraction, as applicable) of the following: (i) the year-end fair value of any equity awards granted in the applicable year that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the year; (ii) the amount of change as of the end of the applicable year (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value of any awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested as of the end of the applicable year; (iii) for awards that are granted and vest in the same applicable year, the fair value as of the vesting date; (iv) for awards granted in prior years that vest in the applicable year, the amount equal to the change as of the vesting date (from the end of the prior fiscal year) in fair value; (v) for awards granted in prior years that are determined to fail to meet the applicable vesting conditions during the applicable year, a deduction for the amount equal to the fair value at the end of the prior fiscal year; and (vi) the dollar value of any dividends or other earnings paid on stock or option awards in the applicable year prior to the vesting date that are not otherwise reflected in the fair value of such award or included in any other component of total compensation for the applicable year. The valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those disclosed at the time of grant. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the equity award adjustments are as follows:

(c)

The amounts included in this column are the amounts reported in “Change in Pension and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year.

(d)

The total pension benefit adjustments for each applicable year include the aggregate of two components: (i) the actuarially determined service cost for services rendered by Mr. McDearman during the applicable year (the “service cost”); and (ii) the entire cost of benefits granted in a plan amendment (or initiation) during the applicable year that are attributed by the benefit formula to services rendered in periods prior to the plan amendment or initiation (the “prior service cost”), in each case, calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The amounts deducted or added in calculating the pension benefit adjustments are as follows:

(3)The dollar amounts reported in column (d) represent the average of the amounts reported for the Company’s named executive officers (NEOs) as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman, who has served as our CEO since 2020) in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the NEOs (excluding Mr. McDearman) included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: (i) for 2023, John Foster, Taylor Walker, Lisa Pominski and Clark Oakley, for (ii) 2022, John Foster, Gary Whitaker, Lisa Pominski and Clark Oakley; (iii) for 2021, John Foster, Gary Whitaker, Lisa Pominski and Clark Oakley; and (iv) for 2020, John Foster, Gary Whitaker, Lisa Pominski and Clark Oakley.

(4)The dollar amounts reported in column (e) represent the average amount of “compensation actually paid” to the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman), as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual average amount of compensation earned, realized or received by the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman) during the applicable year. In accordance with the requirements of Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K, the following adjustments were made to average total compensation for the NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman) for each year to determine the compensation actually paid, using the same methodology described above in Note 2:

(a)

The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total average equity award adjustments are as follows:

(b)

The amounts deducted or added in calculating the total pension benefit adjustments are as follows:

(5)Cumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the Company’s share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period by the Company’s share price at the beginning of the measurement period.

(6)Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the following published industry index: KBW NASDAQ Bank Index.

(7)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year. Net income is the performance metric utilized for purposes of the Company’s annual cash incentive plan and is the only performance metric utilized for our NEOs’ compensation. Accordingly, we are presenting it as our company-selected measure required under Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K.

Financial Performance Measures

As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s performance – based executive compensation program is based exclusively on the Company’s net income with the objective of incentivizing our NEOs to increase the value of our enterprise for our shareholders.

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Cumulative TSR

As demonstrated by the following graph, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. McDearman and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman) is generally aligned with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the four years presented in the table. The alignment of compensation actually paid with the Company’s cumulative TSR over the period presented is because a portion of the compensation actually paid to Mr. McDearman and to the other NEOs is comprised of stock options, cash-settled stock appreciation rights and/or time-based vesting restricted stock units in one or more of the periods reflected.

Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Net Income

As demonstrated by the following table, the amount of compensation actually paid to Mr. McDearman and the average amount of compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. McDearman) is generally aligned with the Company’s net income over the four years presented in the table. The alignment of compensation actually paid with the Company’s net income over the period presented is because a significant portion of the compensation actually paid to Mr. McDearman and to the other NEOs is based upon net income, which is the sole performance metric utilized for the Company’s annual cash incentive plan as described in more detail in the section “Executive Compensation- Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

Cumulative TSR of the Company and Cumulative TSR of the Peer Group

As demonstrated by the following graph, the Company’s cumulative TSR over the four year period presented in the table was 33%, while the cumulative TSR of the peer group presented for this purpose, the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index, was (2%) over the four years presented in the table. The Company’s cumulative TSR outperformed the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index over the four years presented in the table, representing the Company’s superior financial performance as compared to the companies comprising the KBW NASDAQ Bank Index peer group. For more information regarding the Company’s performance and the peer group that the Compensation Committee considers when determining compensation, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”