UNITY BANCORP INC /NJ/

Previous wording

A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 96 percent of its loans had real estate as a primary or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. Weakness in the real estate market in the Company’s primary market areas could result in an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the Company’s profitability and asset quality. Any future declines in real estate values in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets that the Company serves also may result in increases in delinquencies and losses in its loan portfolios. Stress in the real estate market, combined with any weakness in economic conditions could drive losses beyond that which is provided for in the Company’s allowance for credit losses. In that event, the Company’s earnings could be adversely affected.

Current wording

A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 96 percent of its loans had real estate as a primary and/or secondary component of collateral. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. Weakness in the real estate market in the Company’s primary market areas could result in an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the Company’s profitability, capital and asset quality. Any future declines in real estate values in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets that the Company serves also may result in increases in delinquencies and losses in its loan portfolios. Further, such declines in real estate values could impact values in the Company’s debt securities investment portfolio, ultimately resulting in an adverse effect on the Company’s profitability, capital and asset quality. Stress in the real estate market, combined with any weakness in economic conditions could drive losses beyond that which is provided for in the Company’s allowance for credit losses. In that event, the Company’s earnings and capital could be adversely affected.

Previous wording

A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2024, total commercial real estate loans, including construction loans, represented 53.8 percent of our loan portfolio. Included in this portfolio are loans to industries including hotel/motel, retail, educational facilities, office space, warehouses, food/beverage services and religious facilities. Additionally, mixed-use loans, in their hybrid nature, may include these industries, as well as others not denoted above. These types of loans generally expose a lender to a higher degree of credit risk of non-payment and loss than residential mortgage loans do for several factors, including dependence on the successful operation of a business or a project for repayment. Further, the Company facilitates construction-to-permanent financing, which may come with heightened credit risks. In addition, commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The value of the real estate collateral that provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower could deteriorate during the time the credit is extended. Underwriting and portfolio management activities cannot completely eliminate all risks related to these loans. Any significant failure to pay on time by our clients or a significant default by our clients would materially and adversely affect us.

Current wording

A significant portion of the Company’s loan portfolio is secured by commercial real estate. As of December 31, 2025, total commercial real estate loans, including construction loans, represented 56.6 percent of our loan portfolio. Included in this portfolio are loans to industries including hotel/motel, food/beverage services, educational facilities, retail, warehouse, office, religious facilities, automotive, healthcare facilities, gas station and educational facilities. Additionally, mixed-use loans, in their hybrid nature, may include these industries, as well as others not denoted above. These types of loans generally expose a lender to a higher degree of credit risk of non-payment and loss than residential mortgage loans due to several factors, including dependence on the successful operation of a business or a project for repayment. Further, the Company facilitates construction-to-permanent financing, which may come with heightened credit risks. In addition, commercial real estate loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The value of the real estate collateral that provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower could deteriorate during the time the credit is extended. Underwriting, portfolio management activities and other credit administration functions, cannot completely eliminate all risks related to these loans. Any significant failure to pay on time by our clients or a significant default by our clients would materially and adversely affect us.

Previous wording

Concentrations in commercial real estate are closely monitored by regulatory agencies and subject to especially heightened scrutiny both on a public and confidential basis. Any formal or informal action by our supervisors may require us to increase our reserves on these loans and adversely impact our earnings.

Current wording

Concentrations in commercial real estate are closely monitored by regulatory agencies and subject to especially heightened scrutiny both on a public and confidential basis. Any formal or informal action by our supervisors may require us to increase our reserves on these loans and adversely impact our earnings and capital.

Previous wording

A downturn in the real estate market in our primary market areas could result in an increase in the number of borrowers who default on their loans and a reduction in the value of the collateral securing their loans, which in turn could have an adverse effect on our profitability and asset quality. If we are required to liquidate the collateral securing a loan to satisfy the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and shareholders’ equity could be adversely affected. Any weakening of the commercial real estate market may increase the likelihood of default on these loans, which could negatively impact our loan portfolio’s performance and asset quality. For example, any declines in commercial real estate prices in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets we primarily serve, along with the unpredictable long-term path of the economy, may result in increases in delinquencies and losses in our loan portfolios. Unexpected decreases in commercial real estate prices coupled with slow economic growth and elevated levels of unemployment could drive losses beyond those which are provided for in our allowance for credit losses. We also may incur losses on commercial real estate loans due to declines in occupancy rates and rental rates, which may decrease property values and may decrease the likelihood that a borrower may find permanent financing alternatives. Any of these events could increase our costs, require Management's time and attention, and materially and adversely affect us.

Current wording

the debt during a period of reduced real estate values, our earnings and shareholders’ equity could be adversely affected. Any weakening of the commercial real estate market may increase the likelihood of default on these loans, which could negatively impact our loan portfolio’s performance and asset quality. For example, any declines in commercial real estate prices in the New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania markets we primarily serve, along with the unpredictable long-term path of the economy, may result in increases in delinquencies and losses in our loan portfolios. Unexpected decreases in commercial real estate prices coupled with slow economic growth and elevated levels of unemployment could drive losses beyond those which are provided for in our allowance for credit losses. We also may incur losses on commercial real estate loans due to declines in occupancy rates and rental rates, which may decrease property values and may decrease the likelihood that a borrower may find permanent financing alternatives. Any of these events could increase our costs, require Management's time and attention, and materially and adversely affect us.

Previous wording

Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of participating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the lender exhibits prudent risk management. When weaknesses are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions. Any changes to the SBA program, including but not limited to changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to program specific rules impacting volume eligibility under the guaranty program, as well as changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress or funding for the SBA program may also have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any default by the U.S. government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could, among other things, impede our ability to originate SBA loans or sell such loans in the secondary market, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

Our SBA lending program is dependent upon the U.S. federal government. The SBA periodically reviews the lending operations of participating lenders to assess, among other things, whether the lender exhibits prudent risk management. When weaknesses are identified, the SBA may request corrective actions or impose enforcement actions. Any changes to the SBA program, including but not limited to changes to the level of guarantee provided by the federal government on SBA loans, changes to ongoing SBA servicing related expenses, changes to program specific rules impacting volume eligibility under the guaranty program, as well as changes to the program amounts authorized by Congress or funding for the SBA program may also have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, any default by the U.S. government on its obligations or any prolonged government shutdown could, among other things, impede our ability to originate SBA loans or sell such loans in the secondary market, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

We have historically originated a significant number of SBA loans, and sold a significant portion of the guaranteed portions of these loans on the secondary market. We generally retain the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA loans that we originate. Consequently, as of December 31, 2024, we held $36.9 million of SBA loans on our balance sheet, $36.1 million of which primarily consisted of the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans. The non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans have a higher degree of credit risk and risk of loss as compared to the guaranteed portion of such loans. We generally retain the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA loans that we originate and sell, and to the extent the borrowers of such loans experience financial difficulties, our financial condition and results of operations would be adversely impacted.

Current wording

We have historically originated a significant number of SBA loans, and sold a significant portion of the guaranteed portions of these loans on the secondary market. We generally retain the non-guaranteed portions of the SBA loans that we originate. Consequently, as of December 31, 2025, we held $34.3 million of SBA loans on our balance sheet, $5.4 million of which primarily consisted of the non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans. The non-guaranteed portion of SBA loans have a higher degree of credit risk and risk of loss as compared to the guaranteed portion of such loans. We generally retain the

Previous wording

In 2006, the OCC, the FDIC, and the FRB, or collectively, the Agencies, issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices,” or the “CRE Guidance.” Although the CRE Guidance did not establish specific lending limits, it provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure will receive increased supervisory scrutiny where total nonowner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate, and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital, and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months. Using regulatory guidance definitions, the Bank’s commercial real estate loan balance decreased 1.55% for the year ended December 31, 2024 and commercial real estate loans represented 235.05% of the Bank’s risk-based capital at December 31, 2024, a decrease from 269.98% at December 31, 2023.

Current wording

In 2006, the OCC, the FDIC, and the FRB, or collectively, the Agencies, issued joint guidance entitled “Concentrations in Commercial Real Estate Lending, Sound Risk Management Practices,” or the “CRE Guidance.” Although the CRE Guidance did not establish specific lending limits, it provides that a bank’s commercial real estate lending exposure will receive increased supervisory scrutiny where total nonowner occupied commercial real estate loans, including loans secured by apartment buildings, investor commercial real estate, and construction and land loans, represent 300% or more of an institution’s total risk-based capital, and the outstanding balance of the commercial real estate loan portfolio has increased by 50% or more during the preceding 36 months. Using regulatory guidance definitions, the Bank’s commercial real estate loan balance was $868.9 million at December 31, 2025 and commercial real estate loans represented 231.92% of the Bank’s risk-based capital at December 31, 2025, a decrease from 235.05% at December 31, 2024.

Previous wording

There is a risk that the Company may not be repaid in a timely manner, or at all, for loans it makes or securities it purchases.

Current wording

There is a risk that the Company may not be repaid in a timely manner, or at all, for loans it makes or securities it holds.

Previous wording

The risk of nonpayment (or deferred or delayed payment) of loans is inherent in banking. Such nonpayment, or delayed or deferred payment, of loans to the Company may have a material adverse effect on its earnings and overall financial condition, such as increased provision for credit losses, asset recovery costs and lower interest income. Additionally, in compliance with applicable banking laws and regulations and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ U.S. GAAP”), the Company maintains an allowance for credit losses created through charges against earnings. As of December 31, 2024, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $26.8 million, or 1.18 percent of its total loan portfolio and 204.77 percent of its nonaccrual loans. The Company’s marketing focus on small to medium size businesses may result in the assumption by the Company of certain lending risks that are different from or greater than those which would apply to loans made to larger companies. The Company seeks to minimize its credit risk exposure through credit controls, which include evaluation of potential borrowers’ available collateral, liquidity and cash flow. However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will actually reduce credit losses.

Current wording

The risk of nonpayment (or deferred or delayed payment) of loans is inherent in banking. Such nonpayment, or delayed or deferred payment, of loans to the Company may have a material adverse effect on its earnings and overall financial condition, such as increased provision for credit losses, asset recovery costs and lower interest income. Additionally, in compliance with applicable banking laws and regulations and U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ U.S. GAAP”), the Company maintains an allowance for credit losses created through charges against earnings. As of December 31, 2025, the Company’s allowance for credit losses was $32.3 million, or 1.27 percent of its total loan portfolio and 108.40 percent of its nonaccrual loans. The Company’s marketing focus on small to medium size businesses may result in the assumption by the Company of certain lending risks that are different from or greater than those which would apply to loans made to larger companies. The Company seeks to minimize its credit risk exposure through credit controls, which include evaluation of potential borrowers’ available collateral, liquidity, cash flow and debt service coverage (both individually and globally). However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will actually reduce credit losses.

Previous wording

The risk of nonpayment (or deferred or delayed payment) on securities is also inherent in banking. Such nonpayment, or delayed or deferred payment on securities held by the Company, if they occur may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings and overall financial condition. As of December 31, 2024, the Company maintained a valuation reserve on a single available for sale security of $2.8 million. The Company seeks to minimize its credit risk exposure on securities through ongoing monitoring and credit controls, which evaluate the financial condition of the issuer of the securities. However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will actually reduce credit losses.

Current wording

The risk of nonpayment (or deferred or delayed payment) on securities is also inherent in banking. Such nonpayment, or delayed or deferred payment on securities held by the Company, if they occur may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s earnings and overall financial condition. The Company seeks to minimize its credit risk exposure on securities through ongoing monitoring and credit controls, which evaluate the financial condition of the issuer of the securities. However, there can be no assurance that such procedures will actually reduce credit losses.

Previous wording

Like all financial institutions, the Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for loan defaults and nonperformance. Its allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect the results of operations. Risks within the loan portfolio are analyzed on a continuous basis by Management and, periodically, by an independent loan review function and by the Audit Committee. A risk system, consisting of multiple-grading categories, is utilized as an analytical tool to assess risk and the appropriate level of loss reserves. Along with the risk system, Management further evaluates risk characteristics of the loan portfolio under current economic conditions and considers such factors as the financial condition of the borrowers, past and expected credit loss experience, historical trends and other factors that Management feels deserve recognition in establishing an adequate reserve. This risk assessment process is performed at least quarterly and, as adjustments become necessary, they

Current wording

Like all financial institutions, the Company maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for loan defaults and nonperformance. Its allowance for credit losses may not be adequate to cover actual losses and future provisions for credit losses could materially and adversely affect the results of operations. Risks within the loan portfolio are analyzed on a continuous basis by Management and, periodically, by an independent loan review function as overseen by the Audit Committee. A risk system, consisting of multiple-grading categories, is utilized as an analytical tool to assess risk and the appropriate level of credit loss reserves. Along with the risk system, Management further evaluates risk characteristics of the loan portfolio under current economic conditions and considers such factors as the financial condition of the borrowers, past and expected credit loss experience, historical trends and other factors that Management feels deserve recognition in establishing an adequate reserve. This risk assessment process is performed at least quarterly and, as adjustments become necessary, they are realized in the periods in which they become known. The amount of future losses is susceptible to changes in economic, operating and other conditions, including changes in interest rates that may be beyond the Company’s control, and these losses may exceed current estimates. State and federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, review the Company’s loans and allowance for credit losses and may require an increase in its allowance for credit losses. Although the Company believes that its allowance for credit losses is adequate to cover probable and reasonably estimated losses, there can be no assurance that the Company will not further increase the allowance for credit losses or that its regulators will not require an increase to this allowance. Either of these occurrences could adversely affect the Company’s earnings.

Previous wording

Net interest income, the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, represents a significant portion of the Company’s earnings. Both increases and decreases in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company’s profits. Interest rates are subject to factors which are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, competition and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, such as the FRB. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest the Company receives on loans and investment securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including the held to maturity and available for sale securities portfolios and (iii) the average duration of interest-earning assets. This also includes the risk that interest-earning assets may be more responsive to changes in interest rates than interest-bearing liabilities, or vice versa (repricing risk), the risk that the individual interest rates or rate indexes underlying various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities may not change in the same degree over a given time period (basis risk) and the risk of changing interest rate relationships across the spectrum of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability maturities (yield curve risk). The Company monitors interest rate risk through its asset liability management process; however, there are no assurances that this process will reduce interest rate risk exposures.

Current wording

Net interest income, the difference between interest earned on interest-earning assets and interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities, represents a significant portion of the Company’s earnings. Both increases and decreases in the interest rate environment may reduce the Company’s profits. Interest rates are subject to factors which are beyond the Company’s control, including general economic conditions, competition and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies, such as the FRB. Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates and/or quantitative easing or tightening protocols, could influence not only the interest the Company receives on loans and investment securities and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) the ability to originate loans and obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of financial assets and liabilities, including the held to maturity and available for sale securities portfolios and (iii) the average duration of interest-earning assets. This also includes the risk that interest-earning assets may be more responsive to changes in interest rates than interest-bearing liabilities, or vice versa (repricing risk), the risk that the individual interest rates or rate indexes underlying various interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities may not change in the same degree over a given time period (basis risk) and the risk of changing interest rate relationships across the spectrum of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability maturities (yield curve risk). The Company monitors interest rate risk through its asset liability management process; however, there are no assurances that this process will reduce interest rate risk exposures.

Previous wording

For example, the Dodd-Frank Act has resulted in substantial compliance costs and may restrict certain sources of revenue. The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2011. Generally, the Act is effective the day after it is signed into law, but different effective dates apply to specific sections of this law, many of which will not become effective until various Federal regulatory agencies have promulgated rules implementing the statutory provisions. In addition, subsequent legislation and regulatory action has, and future legislation and regulatory action may, amend or revise various provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act.

Current wording

For example, the Dodd-Frank Act has resulted in substantial compliance costs and may restrict certain sources of revenue. The Dodd-Frank Act was signed into law on July 21, 2011. Generally, the Act is effective the day after it is signed into law, but different effective dates apply to specific sections of this law, many of which will not become effective until various Federal regulatory agencies have promulgated rules implementing the statutory provisions. In addition, subsequent

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, $815.1 million, or 38.8%, of the Company’s deposits were time deposits with $768.6 million, or 94.3% of those time deposits, maturing within one year. The Company’s liquidity position could be impacted by these deposits if its customers decide to withdraw funds at maturity and invest in non-deposit products, including but not limited to U.S. Treasuries. Additionally, the Company’s earnings could be impacted if interest rates increase and the Company needs to increase the rates offered on time deposits to retain these funds. The Company’s management monitors the deposit composition of its Consolidated Balance Sheet through various Board and Management reporting on a regular basis.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, the Company had $882.9 million in time deposits, comprising 38.0% of total deposits. Time deposits maturing within one year were $842.4 million, or 95.4% of time deposits and 36.2% of total deposits. Additionally, as of December 31, 2025, uninsured or uncollateralized deposits represented 21.7% of total deposits. The Company’s liquidity position could be impacted by these deposits if its customers decide to withdraw funds at maturity and invest in non-deposit products, including but not limited to U.S. Treasuries, money market funds and other alternative sources. Additionally, the Company’s earnings could be impacted if interest rates increase and the Company needs to increase the rates offered on deposits to retain these funds. The Company’s management and Board of Directors monitors the deposit composition of its Consolidated Balance Sheet through various Board and Management reporting on a regular basis.

Previous wording

There are current proposals from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), the regulatory of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, to refocus on the FHLB’s housing mission. This proposal would require many banks to hold at least 10% of their assets in residential mortgages in order to maintain access to FHLB funding. If these proposals change or progress, this could impact the Company’s ability to borrow from the FHLB and require it to find other sources of credit, including borrowing directly from the FRB.

Current wording

There are current proposals from the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”), the regulatory of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) system, to refocus on the FHLB’s housing mission. This proposal would require many banks to hold at least 10% of their assets in residential mortgages in order to maintain access to FHLB funding. If these proposals change

Previous wording

Apple, Alphabet and Amazon, are further increasing competition to compete for loans, deposits and payments. A number of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources than it does to expend upon advertising and marketing, and their substantially greater capitalization enables them to make much larger loans. Additionally, many of these competitors have less regulation than the Company as they are not financial institutions. The Company’s success depends a great deal upon its judgment that large and mid-size financial institutions do not adequately serve small businesses in its principal market area and upon the Company’s ability to compete favorably for such customers. In addition to competition from larger institutions, the Company also faces competition for individuals and small businesses from small community banks seeking to compete as “hometown” institutions. Most of these smaller institutions have focused their marketing efforts on the smaller end of the small business market the Company serves.

Current wording

The banking industry within the State of New Jersey is highly competitive. The Company’s principal market area is also served by branch offices of large commercial banks and thrift institutions. In addition, the Modernization Act permits other financial entities, such as insurance companies and securities firms, to acquire or form financial institutions, thereby further increasing competition. In addition, financial technology companies, either directly or in partnership with other insured depository institutions, compete for loan and deposit customers. Similarly, larger legacy non-financial companies, such as Apple, Alphabet and Amazon, are further increasing competition to compete for loans, deposits and payments. A number of the Company’s competitors have substantially greater resources than it does to expend upon advertising and marketing, and their substantially greater capitalization enables them to make much larger loans. Additionally, many of these competitors have less regulation than the Company as they are not financial institutions. The Company’s success depends a great deal upon its judgment that large and mid-size financial institutions do not adequately serve small businesses in its principal market area and upon the Company’s ability to compete favorably for such customers. In addition to competition from larger institutions, the Company also faces competition for individuals and small businesses from small community banks seeking to compete as “hometown” institutions. Most of these smaller institutions have focused their marketing efforts on the smaller end of the small business market the Company serves.

Previous wording

The Company has also been active in competing for New Jersey governmental and municipal deposits. At December 31, 2024, the Company held approximately $400.5 million in governmental and municipal deposits. The governor of New Jersey has proposed that the state form and own a bank in which governmental and municipal entities would deposit their excess funds, with the state owned bank then financing small businesses and municipal projects in New Jersey. While no legislation has been introduced in the state legislature, the New Jersey Public Bank Implementation Board has provided its final recommendations to the governor, including that the public bank entity should not be a depository institution but should seek funding from a diverse range of investors and non-depository investment vehicles. However, should this proposal be adopted and a state owned bank formed, it could impede the Company’s ability to attract and retain governmental and municipal deposits, thereby impairing the Company’s liquidity.

Current wording

The Company has also been active in competing for New Jersey governmental and municipal deposits. At December 31, 2025, the Company held approximately $444.9 million in governmental and municipal deposits. The governor of New Jersey has proposed that the state form and own a bank in which governmental and municipal entities would deposit their excess funds, with the state owned bank then financing small businesses and municipal projects in New Jersey. While no legislation has been introduced in the state legislature, the New Jersey Public Bank Implementation Board has provided its final recommendations to the governor, including that the public bank entity should not be a depository institution but should seek funding from a diverse range of investors and non-depository investment vehicles. However, should this proposal be adopted and a state owned bank formed, it could impede the Company’s ability to attract and retain governmental and municipal deposits, thereby impairing the Company’s liquidity.

Previous wording

Given the significant growth in our loan portfolio, many of our loans are unseasoned, meaning that they were originated relatively recently. Approximately 53.0% of our loan portfolio has been originated in the past three years. As a result, it may be difficult to predict the future performance of our loan portfolio. These loans may have delinquency or charge-off levels above our expectations, which could negatively affect our performance.

Current wording

Given the significant growth in our loan portfolio, many of our loans are unseasoned, meaning that they were originated relatively recently. Approximately 42.1% of our loan portfolio has been originated in the past three years. As a result, it may be difficult to predict the future performance of our loan portfolio. These loans may have delinquency or charge-off levels above our expectations, which could negatively affect our performance.

Previous wording

Future offerings of common stock may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s stock.

Current wording

Future offerings of common stock or debt securities may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s stock.

Previous wording

In the future, if the Company’s or the Bank’s capital ratios fall below the prevailing regulatory required minimums, or should the Company seek to expand through acquisitions, the Company or the Bank could be forced to raise additional capital by making additional offerings of common stock or preferred stock. Additional equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing shareholders or reduce the market price of common stock, or both.

Current wording

In the future, if the Company’s or the Bank’s capital ratios fall below the prevailing regulatory minimums, or if the Company seeks to pursue growth opportunities such as acquisitions, the Company or the Bank may be required to raise additional capital through offerings of common stock, preferred stock, subordinated debt, senior debt, or other capital instruments. Any such equity offerings may dilute the holdings of existing shareholders or reduce the market price of the Company’s common stock, or both. Debt offerings could increase the Company’s interest expense, impose restrictive covenants, or otherwise adversely affect the Company’s financial condition. There can be no assurance that any such capital could be raised on acceptable terms, or at all. Future offerings of common stock may adversely affect the market price of the Company’s stock.

Previous wording

The Company expects to continue to experience growth in the scope of its operations and, correspondingly, in the number of its employees and customers. The Company may not be able to successfully manage its business as a result of the strain on Management and operations that may result from this growth. The Company’s ability to manage this growth will depend upon its ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled employees. The Company’s success will also depend on the ability of its officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships and to hire, train and manage employees. Further, given the rise of “remote” and “hybrid” working models, the Company is in competition with more companies and industries for employee retention. The Company’s potential inability to retain key employees could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. As a community banking organization, the Company is highly reliant on key employees, including its Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, heads of key operational areas, area managers, business development officers and loan officers. The loss of these employees could have an adverse impact on the Company’s operating capacities and the ability to implement growth strategies and adversely impact the financial performance.

Current wording

The Company expects to continue to experience growth in the scope of its operations and, correspondingly, in the number of its employees and customers. The Company may not be able to successfully manage its business as a result of the strain on Management and operations that may result from this growth. The Company’s ability to manage this growth will depend upon its ability to continue to attract, hire and retain skilled employees. The Company’s success will also depend on the ability of its officers and key employees to continue to implement and improve operational and other systems, to manage multiple, concurrent customer relationships and to hire, train and manage employees. Further, given the rise of “remote” and “hybrid” working models, the Company is in competition with more companies and industries for employee retention. The Company’s potential inability to retain key employees could have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. As a community banking organization, the Company is highly reliant on key employees, including its Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer, heads of key operational areas, area managers, business development officers and loan officers. The loss of these employees could have an adverse impact on the Company’s operating capacities and the ability to implement growth strategies and adversely impact the financial performance.

Previous wording

Certain events impacting the banking industry, including the bank failures in March and April 2023, resulted in significant disruption and volatility in the capital markets, reduced valuation of bank securities, and decreased confidence in banks among certain depositors and counterparties. While the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC took steps to ensure the depositors of the failed banks in early 2023 would have access to their insured and uninsured deposits, there is no assurance that these or similar actions will restore customer confidence in the baking system, and the Company may be further impacted by concerns regarding the soundness, real or perceived, of

Current wording

Certain events impacting the banking industry, including the bank failures in March and April 2023, resulted in significant disruption and volatility in the capital markets, reduced valuation of bank securities, and decreased confidence in banks among certain depositors and counterparties. While the U.S. Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the FDIC took steps to ensure the depositors of the failed banks in early 2023 would have access to their insured and uninsured deposits, there is no assurance that these or similar actions will restore customer confidence in the baking system, and the Company may be further impacted by concerns regarding the soundness, real or perceived, of other financial institutions or other future bank failures or disruptions. Any loss in client deposits or changes in the Company’s perception could increase the cost of funding, limit access to capital markets or negatively impact the Company’s overall liquidity or capitalization. Further, the cost of resolving the bank failures also prompted the FDIC to issue a special assessment to recover costs to the DIF. The special assessment did not impact the Company; however, the FDIC maintains the ability to impose additional shortfall special assessments, which may adversely impact the Company, in the future.

Previous wording

Although the Company has policies and procedures aimed at detecting and preventing the use of its banking network for money laundering and related activities, those policies and procedures may not eliminate instances in which the Company may be used by customers to engage in illegal or improper activities. To the extent that the Company fails to fully comply

Current wording

Although the Company has policies and procedures aimed at detecting and preventing the use of its banking network for money laundering and related activities, those policies and procedures may not eliminate instances in which the Company may be used by customers to engage in illegal or improper activities. To the extent that the Company fails to fully comply with the applicable laws and regulations, banking agencies may have the authority to impose fines, other penalties and sanctions on the Company.