Skip to main content

DARLING INGREDIENTS INC.

For the period ended Jan 3, 2026. Filed Mar 3, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2026 · Filed Mar 3, 2026

DAR$50.19-1.0%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-28; filed 2025-02-25.

0000916540-25-000008

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2026-01-03; filed 2026-03-03.

0000916540-26-000008

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 285 previous paragraphs and 295 current paragraphs.

165 unchanged; 107 reworded; 14 added; 13 removed; 0 previous and 9 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (14)

Current report

•Our renewable energy businesses, including the DGD Joint Venture, are highly dependent on government programs, incentives and regulatory frameworks, which are subject to change and uncertainty;

Current report

•Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition;

Current report

•We may not generate sufficient cash to service all of our debt and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our debt obligations, which may not be successful;

Current report

Risks Related to our Business

Current report

The Company’s results of operations in its Feed, Food and Fuel Ingredients segments are also impacted by U.S. and foreign tariffs and trade restrictions that affect trade flows, supply and demand and market prices for the Company’s raw materials and finished products.

Current report

•U.S. and foreign tariffs, trade restrictions and nationalistic protections in biofuel policies favoring local production over imports could impact prices, margins and end market opportunities for the biofuels the DGD Joint Venture produces;

Current report

•U.S. and foreign tariffs on biofuels and biofuel feedstocks could also have an inverse effect where biofuel imports into certain countries could be beneficially positioned from a margin standpoint over local production;

Current report

Our renewable energy businesses, including the DGD Joint Venture, are highly dependent on government programs, incentives and regulatory frameworks, which are subject to change and uncertainty.

Current report

Demand for and profitability of our biofuels (including renewable diesel and SAF), biogases and green electricity, including those of DGD, depend in significant part on government programs, mandates, tax credits and incentives in the U.S. and other jurisdictions, including renewable fuel standards, low carbon fuel programs and clean fuel tax credits. These programs are complex, subject to frequent legislative, regulatory and administrative change, and dependent on agency interpretation, guidance enforcement priorities and funding.

Current report

•issues associated with intellectual property protections for the Company’s products and operations, such as defense of our intellectual property in foreign countries and/or, as the Company expands globally, use of our intellectual property on competing products in certain countries where our intellectual property is not registered;

Current report

Furthermore, there is legislation (and additional legislation has been introduced) regulating practices related to the causes and impacts of climate change as well as supply chain control and compliance with human rights. For example, in December 2022 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2022/2464, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”), which requires reporting on sustainability-related issues. In addition, in June 2024 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2024/1760, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD”), which requires risk-based supply chain due diligence and certain activities in the supply chain. In addition, there has been increased state-level legislation in the U.S., like California’s SB 261, which mandates certain companies doing business in California to disclose climate-related financial risks, and SB 253, which requires reporting of corporate greenhouse gas emissions. In both the EU and California the regulations have been delayed pending amendments and legal challenges, which increases the uncertainty around final impacts to the Company. The Company continues to monitor proposed changes to these and other proposed legislative and regulatory requirements related to sustainability issues in state and national jurisdictions. Compliance with CSRD, CSDDD, California’s SB 261 and SB 253, and other proposed or adopted legislative and regulatory requirements related to sustainability issues may require expenditures that could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. There has also been increased focus from our stakeholders, including consumers, customers, suppliers, employees and investors, on our sustainability practices. We expect that stakeholder expectations with respect to sustainability will continue to progress, which may necessitate additional resources to monitor, report on, and adjust our operations.

Current report

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.

Current report

We may not generate sufficient cash to service all of our debt and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our debt obligations, which may not be successful.

Current report

Since its enactment, the ACA has been subject to numerous legislative, regulatory and judicial changes. Although Congress has not repealed the ACA in its entirety, various provisions have been modified, delayed or repealed, including elimination of the federal individual mandate penalty and changes to employer- and insurer-related taxes, and premium subsidy levels have been expanded and extended through 2025. In addition, the ACA has been and continues to be subject to significant judicial challenges, including ongoing litigation regarding the requirement to provide certain preventive services without cost sharing. Future legislative, regulatory or judicial actions could further modify or invalidate portions of the ACA, which could affect the cost, structure or availability of health coverage and have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Removed paragraphs (13)

Previous report

•Our renewable energy businesses may be affected by energy policies around the world;

Previous report

•The proposed Employment Rights Bill is set to overhaul employment law in the UK, with a number of employees friendly proposals which could have an adverse effect on our business due to increased costs associated with being an employer;

Previous report

•Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition;

Previous report

•The United Kingdom's withdrawal from the EU could have an adverse effect on our business, investments and future operations in Europe.

Previous report

Risks Related to the Company

Previous report

Our renewable energy businesses may be affected by energy policies around the world.

Previous report

Furthermore, emerging legislation seeks to regulate corporate environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) practices, including practices related to the causes and impacts of climate change as well as supply chain control and compliance with human rights. For example, in December 2022 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2022/2464 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC and Directive 2013/34/EU, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (“CSRD”). The new rules, which apply to all large (EU and non-EU) companies with significant activities in the EU and to EU-listed small and medium-sized enterprises, require companies to report on how sustainability issues (environmental, social, and governance) affect their business and about their own impact on people and the environment. In addition, in May 2024 the EU adopted Directive (EU) 2024/1760, also known as the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (“CSDDD”). The CSDDD will become gradually applicable starting in 2027 to large (EU and non-EU) companies and parent companies meeting specific thresholds. The new rules require in-scope companies to conduct risk-based due diligence in order to identify, prevent, mitigate and remediate actual and potential adverse impacts on people and the environment resulting from the operations of the company, its subsidiaries and business partners in the Company’s supply chain. In-scope companies are also required to adopt and implement a climate transition plan, setting out a strategy to reduce emissions in line with the Paris Agreement targets. There has also been increased focus from our stakeholders, including consumers, suppliers, employees and investors, on our sustainability and ESG practices. We expect that stakeholder expectations with respect to sustainability and ESG will continue to evolve rapidly, which may necessitate additional resources to monitor, report on, and adjust our operations.

Previous report

The proposed Employment Rights Bill is set to overhaul employment law in the UK, with a number of employee friendly proposals which could have an adverse effect on our business due to increased costs associated with being an employer.

Previous report

On October 10, 2024, the UK government introduced the Employment Rights Bill 2024-25 (the “ER Bill”) to Parliament, aiming to modernize and enhance worker rights through 28 proposed reforms. These reforms are expected to significantly impact UK employment law. The government will consult on these proposals, and changes may occur as the ER Bill progresses through Parliament. Key proposals include the establishment of a new state enforcement body to tackle unlawful employment practices, which would mark a significant shift in UK employment law away from reliance on individual enforcement. Further proposals include making unfair dismissal a right from the first day of employment, changes to redundancy rules and the introduction of new grounds for automatically unfair dismissal to restrict “fire and rehire” practices. In terms of industrial relations, the ER Bill lowers the threshold for trade union recognition and repeals previous restrictions on strike action. For zero hours contracts, it mandates guaranteed hours and reasonable shift notice. Family rights are enhanced with protections for maternity returners, statutory bereavement leave, and the removal of the qualifying period for parental and paternity leave. Statutory Sick Pay reforms include removing the three-day waiting period and a proposal to lower the earnings threshold. These reforms represent a significant shift in favor of employee rights, with detailed consultations expected in 2025 and most reforms unlikely to be implemented until 2026. If enacted, they will bring substantial changes to the UK employment landscape, increasing the costs and risks associated with being an employer, which could in turn have an adverse effect on our business and future operations in the UK.

Previous report

Our substantial level of indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.

Previous report

There have been several legislative changes to, or regulatory changes under, all or certain portions of the ACA since its enactment. For example, on December 20, 2019, then President Trump signed Public Law 116-94, a spending bill that included provisions repealing the so-called “Cadillac” tax on certain high-cost employer-sponsored insurance plans and the annual fee imposed on certain health insurance providers based on market share. Congress has not passed comprehensive repeal legislation, but bills affecting the implementation of the ACA have been signed into law. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, passed in December 2017, includes a provision repealing, effective January 1, 2019, the tax-based shared responsibility payment imposed by the ACA on certain individuals who fail to maintain qualifying health coverage for all or part of a year that is commonly referred to as the “individual mandate” (although a few states have adopted individual mandate requirements that assess penalties against individuals based on their uninsured status). The American Rescue Plan Act also temporarily increased premium tax credit assistance for individuals eligible for subsidies under the ACA for 2021 and 2022 and removed the 400% federal poverty level limit that otherwise applies for purposes of eligibility to receive premium tax credits. The Inflation Reduction Act, signed into law in August 2022, extended this increased tax credit assistance and removal of the 400% federal poverty limit through 2025. There have also been various judicial challenges to the ACA. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a judicial challenge to the ACA brought by several states (which argued that, without the individual mandate, the entire ACA was unconstitutional) without specifically ruling on the constitutionality of the ACA. Another significant challenge to the ACA is currently under review by the U.S. Supreme Court. Specifically, in Braidwood Management v. Becerra, the plaintiffs argue that the ACA’s requirement that insurance cover certain preventive services without cost sharing is unconstitutional. In September 2022, a federal district court in Texas ruled partly in favor of the plaintiffs and partly in favor of the Department of Health and Human Services, which is defending the ACA, finding, among other things, that the requirement that self-funded plans and insurers cover certain preventive services violates the plaintiffs' rights under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. The federal government appealed this decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which partially upheld the district court’s ruling, finding that the ACA’s requirement to cover preventative services without cost-sharing is unconstitutional. However, the Fifth Circuit overruled the lower court’s nationwide injunction, holding that only the plaintiffs’ health care plans are permitted to exclude the ACA-mandated preventative services from their plans, and remanded certain o…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Previous report

The United Kingdom's withdrawal from the EU could have an adverse effect on our business, investments and future operations in Europe.

Previous report

The UK ceased to be a member of the EU on January 31, 2020 (“Brexit”), creating uncertainty in the global financial markets. On December 24, 2020, the EU and the UK reached an agreement in principle on certain agreements and declarations governing the ongoing relationship between the EU and the UK (the “EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement”). The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement was provisionally applied from January 1, 2021 before entering into force on May 1, 2021. In accordance with the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, UK exports of products that are derived from animal by-products entering the EU must follow third country rules, including being accompanied by an export health certificate or model declaration form, and can be subjected to veterinary checks or having to enter through designated board inspection posts. Under the UK Border Target Operating Model, certain additional controls on imports into the UK have been introduced in a phased manner under transitional measures. These include the introduction of physical inspections of imports of food, plant and animal produce from the EU from April 30, 2024. As matters currently stand, under the terms of the Northern Ireland Protocol (the “NI Protocol”), contained within the EU (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020, Northern Ireland is treated for the same purposes as if it were still an EU Member State, and must remain aligned to the EU single market and customs rules. Following a series of negotiations between the UK and the EU on the NI Protocol, on March 24, 2023, the UK government amended the NI Protocol by implementing the Windsor Framework (the “Framework”) which aims to, inter alia, (a) reduce the level of controls on goods coming from Great Britain which are intended to be sold in Northern Ireland, and (b) ensure EU law only applies in Northern Ireland to the minimum extent necessary to avoid a hard border with Ireland and allow Northern Ireland businesses to continue accessing the EU market. The Framework also introduced the ‘Stormont Brake’, a mechanism that gives the Northern Ireland assembly the power to call on the UK to veto the application of EU goods rules that would have significant and lasting effects in Northern Ireland. The Framework will be implemented in stages through 2025, to provide businesses time to adapt to the new arrangements. The EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement allows for future deviation from the current regulatory framework and it is not known if and/or when any deviations may occur, which may have an impact on Darling Ingredient’s business. These developments and the impact of the terms of the NI Protocol can cause import/export delays between the EU and the UK, and can entail additional costs within the UK itself, where imports/exports are with Northern Ireland. Additionally, the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement can potentially impair the ability of Darling Ingredients International to transact business in the UK, including by restricting th…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Reworded paragraphs (107)

Previous wording

•The prices of many of our products are subject to significant volatility;

Current wording

•The prices of many of our products are subject to significant volatility associated with commodities markets;

Previous wording

•Our business is dependent on the procurement of raw materials, which is the most competitive aspect of our business;

Current wording

•Our business is dependent on the procurement of raw materials, which is a competitive aspect of our business;

Previous wording

•Seasonal factors and weather, including the physical impacts of climate changes, can impact the availability, quality and volume of raw materials that we process and negatively affect our operations;

Current wording

•Seasonal factors and weather, including the physical impacts of climate related changes, can impact the availability, quality and volume of raw materials that we process and negatively affect our operations;

Previous wording

•Our operations are subject to various laws, rules and regulations including those relating to the protection of the environment and to health and safety, and we could incur significant costs to comply with these requirements or be subject to sanctions or held liable for damages, including environmental damages;

Current wording

•Our operations are subject to extensive and evolving environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and we could incur significant costs to comply with these requirements or be subject to sanctions or held liable for damages, including environmental damages;

Previous wording

•Our business may be affected by the impact of animal related disease, such as BSE, and by other food safety issues;

Current wording

•Our business may be affected by the impact of animal related disease, such as BSE, and by other food safety or food regulatory issues;

Previous wording

•Pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, such as coronavirus (“COVID-19”), may disrupt our business, including, among other things, our supply chain and production processes, each of which could materially affect our operations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations;

Current wording

•Pandemics, epidemics or disease outbreaks, may disrupt our business, including, among other things, our supply chain and production processes, each of which could materially affect our operations, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations;

Previous wording

•Despite our existing level of indebtedness, we and our subsidiaries may still be able to incur substantially more indebtedness, which could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition described above;

Current wording

•Despite our existing level of indebtedness, we and our subsidiaries could substantially increase our indebtedness, which could further exacerbate the risks to our financial condition described above;

Previous wording

•Our ability to repay our indebtedness depends in part on the performance of our subsidiaries, including our non-guarantor subsidiaries, and their ability to make payments;

Current wording

•Our ability to make payments on our debt depends in part on the performance of our subsidiaries, including our non-guarantor subsidiaries, and their ability to transfer funds to members of our group liable to make payments on our debt;

Previous wording

•We may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions, and such acquisitions could result in unknown liabilities, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require significant management resources;

Current wording

•We may not successfully identify and complete acquisitions or joint ventures on favorable terms or achieve anticipated synergies relating to any acquisitions or joint ventures, and such acquisitions or joint ventures could result in unknown liabilities, unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures and require significant management resources;

Previous wording

We may incur significant charges and experience disruptions or losses of customer and/or supplier relationships in the event we close or divest all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility.

Current wording

•We may incur significant charges and experience disruptions or losses of customer and/or supplier relationships in the event we close or divest all or part of a manufacturing plant or facility; and

Previous wording

The prices of many of our products are subject to significant volatility.

Current wording

The prices of many of our products are subject to significant volatility associated with commodities markets.

Previous wording

Our principal finished products in our Feed Ingredients segment include MBM, PM, BFT, YG, PG, BBP and hides, which are commodities. We also manufacture and sell a number of other products that are derived from animal by-products and many of which are commodities or compete with commodities. The prices of these commodities are quoted on, or derived from prices quoted on, established commodity markets. Accordingly, our results of operations will be affected by fluctuations in the prevailing market prices of these finished products or of other commodities that may be substituted for our products by our customers. Historically, market prices for commodity grains, fats and food stocks have fluctuated in response to a number of factors, including global changes in supply and demand resulting from changes in local and global economic conditions, global government agriculture programs, energy policies of U.S. and foreign governments, and international agricultural trading policies, the impact of disease outbreaks on protein sources and the potential effect on supply and demand, as well as weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. While we seek to mitigate the risks associated with price declines, a significant decrease in the market price of any of our products or of other commodities that may be substituted for our products would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow. Furthermore, rapid and material changes in finished goods prices, including competing agricultural-based alternative ingredients, generally have an immediate and, often times, material impact on the Company’s gross margin and profitability resulting from the lapse of time between the procurement of the raw materials and the sale of the finished goods. Increases in the market prices of raw materials would require us to raise prices for our premium, value-added and branded products to avoid margin deterioration. There can be no assurance as to whether we could implement future price increases in response to increases in the market prices of raw materials or how any such price increases would affect future sales volumes to our customers. Our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected in the future by this volatility. Furthermore, an increased preference by meat processors for alternative feed ingredients, such as all vegetable diets in the case of poultry producers, could negatively impact the prices of certain of our finished products which would need to be sold to alternative markets and destinations.

Current wording

Our principal finished products in our Feed Ingredients segment include MBM, PM, BFT, YG, PG, BBP and hides, which are commodities. We also manufacture and sell a number of other products that are derived from animal by-products and many of which are commodities or compete with commodities. The prices of these commodities are quoted on, or derived from prices quoted on, established commodity markets. Accordingly, our results of operations will be affected by fluctuations in the prevailing market prices of these finished products or of other commodities that may be substituted for our products by our customers. Historically, market prices for commodity grains, fats and food stocks have fluctuated in response to a number of factors, including global changes in supply and demand resulting from changes in local and global economic conditions, global government agriculture programs, energy policies of U.S. and foreign governments, and international agricultural trading policies, the impact of disease outbreaks on protein sources and the potential effect on supply and demand, as well as weather conditions during the growing and harvesting seasons. A significant decrease in the market price of any of our products or of other commodities that may be substituted for our products would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flow. Furthermore, rapid and material changes in finished goods prices, including competing agricultural-based alternative ingredients, generally have an immediate and, often times, material impact on the Company’s gross margin and profitability resulting from the lapse of time between the procurement of the raw materials and the sale of the finished goods. Increases in the market prices of raw materials would require us to raise prices for our premium, value-added and branded products to avoid margin deterioration. We may not be able to implement future price increases in response to increases in the market prices of raw materials, and any such price increases may have adverse impacts on future sales volumes. Our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected in the future by this volatility. Furthermore, an increased preference by meat processors for alternative feed ingredients, such as all vegetable diets in the case of poultry producers, could negatively impact the prices of certain of our finished products that would need to be sold to alternative markets and destinations.

Previous wording

The Company’s Fuel Ingredients segment, which converts fats and oils into renewable diesel, SAF, organic sludge and food waste into biogas, and fallen stock into low-grade energy sources, is impacted by world energy prices for oil, electricity and natural gas, as well as potential competition from the adoption of non-rendered feedstock in biofuel markets.

Current wording

The Company’s Fuel Ingredients segment, which converts fats and oils into biofuels (including renewable diesel and SAF), organic sludge and food waste into biogas, and fallen stock into low-grade energy sources, is impacted by world energy prices for oil, electricity and natural gas, as well as potential competition from the adoption of non-rendered feedstock in biofuel markets.

Previous wording

Our business is dependent on the procurement of raw materials, which is the most competitive aspect of our business.

Current wording

Our business is dependent on the procurement of raw materials, which is a competitive aspect of our business.

Previous wording

The rendering industry is highly fragmented and both the rendering and bakery residual industries are very competitive. We compete with other rendering businesses and alternative methods of disposal of animal by-products, bakery residue and used cooking oil provided by trash haulers, waste management companies and biofuel companies, as well as the alternative of illegal disposal. See Item 1. “Competition.” In addition, U.S. restaurants experience theft of used cooking oil, the frequency and magnitude of which increases with the rise in value of used cooking oil. Depending on market conditions, we either charge a collection fee to offset a portion of the cost incurred in collecting raw material, collect on a no pay/no charge basis or pay for the raw material. To the extent suppliers of raw materials look to alternate methods of disposal, whether as a result of our collection fees being deemed too expensive, the payments we offer being deemed too low or otherwise, our raw material supply and/or collection fee revenues will decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the amount of raw material acquired, which has a direct impact on the amount of finished goods produced, can also have a material effect on our gross margin reported, as the Company has a substantial amount of fixed operating costs. In addition, we utilize an extensive vehicle fleet to collect and transport raw material, for which we compete with other industries for qualified drivers. The U.S. has been experiencing a growing shortage of truck drivers. Our failure to hire and retain a sufficient number of truck drivers to operate our fleet could negatively impact our ability to collect and transport raw materials in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Current wording

The rendering industry is highly fragmented and both the rendering and bakery residual industries are very competitive. We compete with other rendering businesses and alternative methods of disposal of animal by-products, bakery residue and used cooking oil provided by trash haulers, waste management companies and biofuel companies, as well as the alternative of illegal disposal. See Item 1. “Competition.” In addition, U.S. restaurants experience theft of used cooking oil, the frequency and magnitude of which increases with the rise in value of used cooking oil. Depending on market conditions, we either charge a collection fee to offset a portion of the cost incurred in collecting raw material, collect on a no pay/no charge basis or pay for the raw material. To the extent suppliers of raw materials look to alternate methods of disposal, whether as a result of our collection fees being deemed too expensive, the payments we offer being deemed too low or otherwise, our raw material supply and/or collection fee revenues will decrease, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the amount of raw material acquired, which has a direct impact on the amount of finished goods produced, can also have a material effect on our gross margin reported, as the Company has a substantial amount of fixed operating costs. In addition, we utilize an extensive vehicle fleet to collect and transport raw material, for which we compete with other industries for qualified drivers, which from time to time are in short supply. Our failure to hire and retain a sufficient number of truck drivers to operate our fleet could negatively impact our ability to collect and transport raw materials in an efficient and cost-effective manner.

Previous wording

In January 2011, Darling, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into a limited liability company agreement (as subsequently amended, the “DGD LLC Agreement”) with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valero to form the DGD Joint Venture, which was formed to design, engineer, construct and operate the DGD St. Charles Plant. Since that time, the DGD Joint Venture has completed several expansion projects and currently operates the DGD St. Charles Plant and the DGD Port Arthur Plant. As of December 28, 2024, under the equity method of accounting, we had an investment in the DGD Joint Venture of approximately $2.2 billion included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. There is no assurance that the DGD Joint Venture will continue to be profitable or allow us to continue to make a return on our investment.

Current wording

In January 2011, one of our wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a limited liability company agreement (as subsequently amended, the “DGD LLC Agreement”) with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Valero to form the DGD Joint Venture, which was formed to design, engineer, construct and operate the DGD St. Charles Plant. Since that time, the DGD Joint Venture has completed several expansion projects and currently operates the DGD St. Charles Plant and the DGD Port Arthur Plant. As of January 3, 2026, under the equity method of accounting, we had an investment in the DGD Joint Venture of approximately $2.1 billion included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Nonetheless, the DGD Joint Venture may not continue to be profitable, may not continue to make distributions or allow us to continue to make a return on our investment, or could result in a negative return on our investment.

Previous wording

DGD’s operations are conducted through a joint venture with Valero. Accordingly, we share control with our joint venture partner over certain economic, legal and business interests of DGD, who may have economic, business, orlegal interests, opportunities, or goals that are inconsistent with, or different from, our opportunities, goals, and interests, or may have different liquidity needs or financial condition characteristics than our own, be subject to different legal or contractual obligations than we are, or be unable to meet their obligations. For instance, while we share certain management rights with our joint venture partner under the DGD LLC Agreement, we do not have full control of every aspect of DGD’s business and certain significant decisions concerning DGD, including, among others, the acquisition or disposition of assets above a certain value threshold, making certain changes to DGD’s business plan, raising debt or equity capital, DGD’s distribution policy, and entering into particular transactions, also require certain approvals from our joint venture partner. Failure by us or our joint venture partner to adequately manage the risks associated with DGD and any differences in views among us and our joint venture partner could prevent or delay actions that are in the best interests of us or the DGD Joint Venture and could have a material adverse effect on our, or the DGD Joint Venture’s, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Furthermore, our equity in net income of DGD, which is based on our 50% interest in the unconsolidated earnings of the standalone DGD financial statements, may not always match our joint venture partner’s consolidated results and presentation. In addition, the DGD LLC Agreement limits our ability to freely transfer or sell our interest in the DGD Joint Venture.

Current wording

The DGD Joint Venture’s operations are conducted through a joint venture with Valero. Accordingly, we share control with our joint venture partner over certain economic, legal and business interests of the DGD Joint Venture, who may have economic, business, orlegal interests, opportunities, or goals that are inconsistent with, or different from, our opportunities, goals, and interests, or may have different liquidity needs or financial condition characteristics than our own, be subject to different legal or contractual obligations than we are, or be unable to meet their obligations. For instance, while we share certain management rights with our joint venture partner under the DGD LLC Agreement, we do not have full control of every aspect of the DGD Joint Venture’s business and certain significant decisions concerning the DGD Joint Venture require certain approvals from our joint venture partner, including, among others, the acquisition or disposition of assets above a certain value threshold, making certain changes to the DGD Joint Venture’s business plan, raising debt or equity capital, the DGD Joint Venture’s distribution policy, and entering into particular transactions. Failure by us or our joint venture partner to adequately manage the risks associated with the DGD Joint Venture and any differences in views among us and our joint venture partner could prevent or delay actions that are in the best interests of us or the DGD Joint Venture and could have a material adverse effect on our, or the DGD Joint Venture’s, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Furthermore, our equity in net income of the DGD Joint Venture, which is based on our 50% interest in the unconsolidated earnings of the standalone DGD Joint Venture financial statements, may not always match our joint venture partner’s consolidated results and presentation. In addition, the DGD LLC Agreement limits our ability to freely transfer or sell our interest in the DGD Joint Venture.

Previous wording

The DGD Joint Venture is dependent on governmental energy policies and programs, such as the National Renewable Fuel Standard Program (“RFS”) and low carbon fuel standards (“LCFS”) (such as in the state of California), which positively impact the demand for and price of renewable diesel. Any changes to, a failure to enforce or a discontinuation of any of these programs could have a material adverse effect on the DGD Joint Venture. See the section entitled“Risk Factors-Risks Related to the Company-Our renewable energy businesses may be affected by energy policies around the world.” Additionally, there may be new entrants into the renewable fuels industry or new technologies developed that could meet demand for lower-carbon transportation fuels and modes of transportation in a more efficient or less costly manner than our technologies and products, which could also have a material adverse effect on the DGD Joint Venture. For instance, several other companies have made, or announced interest in making, investments in renewable diesel projects. Should these projects develop, the DGD Joint Venture would face competition from them for feedstocks and customers, which could strain margins on the products it sells and limit the growth and profitability of the DGD Joint Venture. It is not possible at this time to predict the ultimate form, timing, or extent of any such developments; however, a reduction in the demand for the DGD Joint Venture’s products as a result of any of the foregoing events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

Current wording

Additionally, there may be new entrants into the biofuels industry or new technologies developed that could meet demand for lower-carbon transportation fuels and modes of transportation in a more efficient or less costly manner than our technologies and products, which could also have a material adverse effect on the DGD Joint Venture. For instance, several other companies have made, or announced interest in making, investments in biofuel projects. Should these projects develop, the DGD Joint Venture would face competition from them for feedstocks and customers, which could strain margins on the products it sells and limit the growth and profitability of the DGD Joint Venture. It is not possible at this time to predict the ultimate form, timing, or extent of any such developments; however, a reduction in the demand for the DGD Joint Venture’s products as a result of any of the foregoing events could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

Previous wording

DGD’s production plants are its principal operating assets and are subject to planned and unplanned downtime and interruptions. Its operations could also be subject to significant interruption if one of its plants were to experience a major accident or mechanical failure, be damaged by severe weather or natural disasters (such as hurricanes) or man-made disasters (such as cybersecurity incidents or acts of terrorism), or otherwise be forced to shut down or curtail operations. If any of its plants, or related pipeline or terminal, were to experience an interruption in operations, our earnings could be materially and adversely affected (to the extent not recoverable through insurance) because of lost productivity and repair and other costs.

Current wording

The DGD Joint Venture’s production plants are its principal operating assets and are subject to planned and unplanned downtime and interruptions. Its operations could also be subject to significant interruption if one of its plants were to experience a major accident or mechanical failure, be damaged by severe weather or natural disasters (such as hurricanes) or man-made disasters (such as cybersecurity incidents or acts of terrorism), or otherwise be forced to shut down or curtail operations. If any of its plants, or related pipelines or terminals, were to experience an interruption in operations, our earnings could be materially and adversely affected (to the extent not recoverable through insurance) because of lost productivity and repair and other costs.

Previous wording

•the inaccuracy of our assumptions about prices or demand for the renewable diesel or SAF that the DGD Joint Venture produces;

Current wording

•the inaccuracy of our assumptions about prices or demand for the biofuels (including renewable diesel and SAF) that the DGD Joint Venture produces;

Previous wording

•the risk that one or more competitive new renewable diesel or SAF plants are constructed that use different technologies from the DGD Joint Venture and result in the marketing of products that are more effective as a substitute for carbon-based fuels or less expensive than the products marketed by the DGD Joint Venture;

Current wording

•the risk that one or more competitive new biofuel (including renewable diesel and SAF) plants are constructed that use different technologies from the DGD Joint Venture and result in the marketing of products that are more effective as a substitute for carbon-based fuels or less expensive than the products marketed by the DGD Joint Venture;

Previous wording

Markets and/or prices for our biofuels, biogases and green electricity, including those of DGD, may be impacted by government policies around the world relating to renewable energy and greenhouse gas emissions (“GHG”). Programs like RFS and LCFS and tax credits for biofuels both in the United States and abroad are subject to revision and change which may impact the demand for our finished products. Furthermore, support from renewable identification numbers (“RINs”), LCFS credits, and other government programs play an important role in the makeup of margins for DGD, and we are exposed to the volatility in the market price of RINs, LCFS credits, and other credits. We cannot predict the future prices of RINs, LCFS credits or other credits, nor can we predict changes or continued implementation of policies that support these programs.

Current wording

Programs like RFS and LCFS, compliance and tax credits for biofuels and mandates for biofuel use, both in the United States and abroad, are subject to revision and change which may impact the demand for our finished products and margins. Support from the programs and credits plays an important role in the makeup of margins for the DGD Joint Venture, and, accordingly, we are exposed to volatility in the market price of these credits, including LCFS credits and RINs (which act as compliance credits under the RFS). We cannot predict the future prices of RINs, LCFS credits or other credits, nor can we predict changes or continued implementation of policies that support these programs.

Previous wording

The EPA created the RFS program pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Under the RFS program, the EPA is required by statute to set annual quotas for the volume of renewable fuels that must be blended into petroleum-based transportation fuels consumed in the U.S. 14 months prior to the compliance year. The quotas are set by class of renewable fuel (i.e., biomass-based diesel, cellulosic biofuel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel) and are collectively referred to as the renewable volume obligation (“RVO”). The RVO must be met by obligated parties, who are the producers and importers of the petroleum-based transportation fuels consumed in the U.S. Obligated parties demonstrate compliance annually by retiring the appropriate number of RINs associated with each class of renewable fuel to satisfy their RVO. A RIN is effectively a compliance credit that is assigned to each gallon of qualifying renewable fuel produced in, or imported into, the U.S. RINs are obtained by blending those renewable fuels into petroleum based transportation fuels, and obligated parties can also achieve compliance by purchasing RINs in the open market.

Current wording

The EPA created the RFS program pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 2005 and the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. Under the RFS program, the EPA is required by statute to set annual quotas for the volume of renewable fuels that must be blended into petroleum-based transportation fuels consumed in the U.S. 14 months prior to the compliance year. The quotas are set by class of renewable fuel (e.g., biomass-based diesel, cellulosic biofuel, advanced biofuel, and total renewable fuel) and are collectively referred to as the renewable volume obligation (“RVO”). The RVO must be met by obligated parties, who are the producers and importers of the petroleum-based transportation fuels consumed in the U.S. Obligated parties demonstrate compliance annually by retiring the appropriate number of renewable identification numbers (“RINs”) associated with each class of renewable fuel to satisfy their RVO. A RIN is a compliance credit that is assigned to each gallon of qualifying renewable fuel produced in, or imported into, the U.S. under the RFS program. RINs are obtained by blending those renewable fuels into petroleum based transportation fuels, and obligated parties can also achieve compliance by purchasing RINs in the open market.

Previous wording

Pursuant to the requirements established by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the finalized 2010 RFS regulation mandated the domestic use of biomass-based diesel (biodiesel, renewable diesel or renewable jet fuel) of 1.0 billion gallons in 2012 and a minimum of 1.0 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel for 2012 and subsequent years. This amount is subject to increase by the Administrator of the EPA. The volume mandates for 2022 were 2.76 billion gallons for biomass-based diesel, 5.63 billion RINs for advanced biofuel, and 20.63 billion RINs for total renewable fuel.

Current wording

Pursuant to the requirements established by the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, the finalized 2010 RFS regulation mandated the domestic use of biomass-based diesel (biodiesel, renewable diesel or renewable jet fuel) of 1.0 billion gallons in 2012 and a minimum of 1.0 billion gallons of biomass-based diesel for subsequent years. This amount is subject to increase by the Administrator of the EPA. The volume mandates for 2022 were 2.76 billion gallons for biomass-based diesel, 5.63 billion RINs for advanced biofuel, and 20.63 billion RINs for total renewable fuel.

Previous wording

In June of 2023, the EPA published a final rule that establishes required RFS volumes for 2023, 2024, and 2025. For biomass-based diesel, the EPA set 2.82 billion gallons for 2023, 3.04 billion gallons for 2024, and 3.35 billion gallons for 2025. For the advanced biofuel category, the EPA set 5.94 billion RINs for 2023, 6.54 billion RINs for 2024, and 7.33 billion RINs for 2025. For total renewable fuel, the EPA set 20.94 billion RINs for 2023, 21.54 billion RINs for 2024, and 22.33 billion RINs for 2025.

Current wording

In June of 2023, the EPA published a final rule that established required RFS volumes for 2023, 2024, and 2025. For biomass-based diesel, the EPA set 2.82 billion gallons for 2023, 3.04 billion gallons for 2024, and 3.35 billion gallons for 2025. For the advanced biofuel category, the EPA set 5.94 billion RINs for 2023, 6.54 billion RINs for 2024, and 7.33 billion RINs for 2025. For total renewable fuel, the EPA set 20.94 billion RINs for 2023, 21.54 billion RINs for 2024, and 22.33 billion RINs for 2025.

Previous wording

For RFS compliance purposes, biomass-based diesel credits (RINs) satisfy the biomass-based diesel requirement, the overall advanced biofuel requirement, and the total renewable fuel requirement. In order to generate a RIN, each type of fuel from each type of feedstock is required to reduce GHG emissions by levels specified in the regulation. The EPA has determined that biodiesel or renewable diesel produced from waste oils, fats, and greases exceed the 50% threshold established by the regulation to generate advanced biofuel and biomass-based diesel RINs.

Current wording

For RFS compliance purposes, RINs satisfy the biomass-based diesel requirement, the overall advanced biofuel requirement, and the total renewable fuel requirement. In order to generate a RIN, each type of fuel from each type of feedstock is required to reduce greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions by levels specified in the regulation. The EPA has determined that biodiesel or renewable diesel produced from waste oils, fats, and greases exceed the 50% threshold established by the regulation to generate advanced biofuel and biomass-based diesel RINs.

Previous wording

In August of 2022, as part of the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, the blender tax credit was extended at $1.00 per gallon until December 31, 2024. As a blender, the DGD Joint Venture has recorded approximately $1,281.7 million of blender tax credits for fiscal 2024, with Darling's portion equaling 50%. In January 2025, the Clean Fuels Production Credit (CFPC) became effective through 2027. Under the CFPC, non-aviation transportation fuel receives a credit equal to either $0.20/gallon or $1.00/gallon multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.00 per gallon baseline, the fuel must be produced at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements. In contrast to the blender tax credit, the CFPC requires that production must take place in the United States and the fuel must be sold in a certain manner. Under the CFPC, sustainable aviation fuel receives a credit equal to either $0.35/gallon or $1.75/gallon multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.75 per gallon baseline, the neat SAF must be produced in the United States at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements before being sold for use in an aircraft. In fiscal 2024, the Company’s share of tax credits for biofuels DGD produced was material to the Company, so any legal challenges or changes to, a failure to enforce, reductions in the mandated volumes under, or discontinuing any of these programs could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.

Current wording

In January 2025, the Clean Fuels Production Credit (“CFPC”) introduced under the IR Act became effective through 2027, and replaced the blender tax credit that was in effect in prior years. Under the CFPC, non-aviation transportation fuel receives a tax credit equal to either $0.20/gallon or $1.00/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.00 per gallon baseline, the fuel must be produced at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements before being sold in a certain manner. Under the CFPC, SAF receives a tax credit equal to either $0.35/gallon or $1.75/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) multiplied by the fuel’s emission reduction percentage. In order to start with the $1.75 per gallon baseline, SAF must be produced in the United States at a qualifying facility that meets the prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements before being sold for use in an aircraft. In contrast to the blender tax credit, the CFPC requires that production of eligible fuels must take place in the United States. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”) was enacted in the U.S. The OBBBA extended the CFPC for two years through 2029 and, beginning in 2026, reduces the maximum credit rate for SAF to $1.00/gallon (adjusted for inflation each calendar year) and specifies that transportation fuels must be derived from feedstocks produced or grown in the U.S., Mexico or Canada to be eligible.

Previous wording

The transition from the blender tax credit to the CFPC on January 1, 2025 introduced a number of risks that could negatively impact the results of operations of the DGD Joint Venture and cause a material and adverse impact to the Company. These include, but are not limited to: credit eligibility and compliance risks for failure to satisfy qualification, prevailing wage and apprenticeship and other certification and documentation requirements which could reduce credit values or void credits; regulatory risks because the U.S. Treasury has yet to provide final CFPC regulations, and credits earned since January 1, 2025 must be determined based on currently available information from Treasury; legislative risks with a new administration in the U.S., including risks associated with the CFPC being modified, repealed or paused; and credit transfer risks, including the development of markets to sell the credits, the strength of any such markets and the viability of the credits with respect to discounts to credit values on sales, and potential Company indemnities with credit sales which introduce the risk of reimbursing buyers for any later credit adjustments including potential penalties, interest and tax gross-ups which could be material.

Current wording

For example, the transition from the blender tax credit to the CFPC on January 1, 2025 introduced a number of risks that could negatively impact the results of operations of the DGD Joint Venture and cause a material and adverse impact to the Company. These include, but are not limited to: credit eligibility and compliance risks for failure to satisfy qualification, prevailing wage and apprenticeship and other certification and documentation requirements which could reduce credit values or void credits; regulatory risks because the U.S. Treasury has yet to provide final CFPC regulations, and credits earned since January 1, 2025 must be determined based on currently available information from Treasury; and credit transfer risks, including the development of markets to sell the credits, the strength of any such markets and the viability of the credits with respect to discounts to credit values on sales, and potential Company indemnities with respect to credit sales which introduce the risk of reimbursing buyers for any later credit adjustments including potential penalties, interest and tax gross-ups which could be material.

Previous wording

Our operations are highly dependent on the use of natural gas, diesel fuel and electricity and a disruption in any of them could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the affected facility. We consume significant volumes of natural gas to operate boilers in our plants, which generate steam to heat raw materials, and natural gas prices represent a significant cost of facility operations included in cost of sales. We also consume significant volumes of diesel fuel to operate our fleet of tractors and trucks used to collect raw materials, and diesel fuel prices represent a significant component of cost of collection expenses included in cost of sales. Prices for both natural gas and diesel fuel can be volatile, partially due to the ongoing Russian-Ukraine war, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and other Middle Eastern conflicts or the inflationary environment, and therefore, represent an ongoing challenge to our operating results. Although we continually manage these costs and hedge our exposure to changes in fuel prices through our formula pricing, and from time to time, derivatives, a material increase in prices for natural gas and/or diesel fuel over a sustained period of time could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We also require a significant amount of electricity in operating certain of our facilities, a significant increase in the cost of which could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the affected facility. Additionally, the availability of natural gas, diesel fuel and electricity can be affected by numerous events such as weather (e.g., hurricanes and periods of considerable heat or cold), pipeline and other logistics interruptions, electric grid outages, cybersecurity incidents, intermittent electricity generation, hostilities, sanctions and supply and demand imbalances.

Current wording

Our operations are highly dependent on the use of natural gas, diesel fuel and electricity and a disruption in any of them could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the affected facility. We consume significant volumes of natural gas to operate boilers in our plants, which generate steam to heat raw materials, and natural gas prices represent a significant cost of facility operations included in cost of sales. We also consume significant volumes of diesel fuel to operate our fleet of vehicles used to collect raw materials, and diesel fuel prices represent a significant component of cost of collection expenses included in cost of sales. Prices for both natural gas and diesel fuel can be volatile, partially due to conflicts around the world, such as the ongoing Russian-Ukraine war and conflicts in the Middle East, and inflation, and therefore, represent an ongoing challenge to our operating results. Despite our efforts to manage these costs and hedge our exposure to changes in fuel prices through our formula pricing, and from time to time, derivatives, a material increase in prices for natural gas and/or diesel fuel over a sustained period of time could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. We also require a significant amount of electricity in operating certain of our facilities, a significant increase in the cost of which could have a material adverse effect on the business and results of operations of the affected facility. Additionally, the availability of natural gas, diesel fuel and electricity can be affected by numerous events such as weather (e.g., hurricanes and periods of considerable heat or cold), pipeline and other logistics interruptions, electric grid outages, cybersecurity incidents, intermittent electricity generation, hostilities, sanctions and supply and demand imbalances.

Previous wording

In fiscal year 2024, the Company’s top ten customers for finished products accounted for approximately 36% of product sales. In addition, the Company’s top ten raw material suppliers accounted for approximately 26% of its raw material supply in the same period. Disruptions or modifications to, or termination of, our relationship with any of our significant suppliers or customers, or financial difficulties experienced by any of our suppliers or customers that lead to curtailment or termination of their operations, could cause our businesses to suffer significant financial losses and could have a material adverse effect on our business, earnings, financial condition and/or cash flows.

Current wording

In fiscal year 2025, the Company’s top ten customers for finished products accounted for approximately 40% of product sales. In addition, the Company’s top ten raw material suppliers accounted for approximately 27% of its raw material supply in the same period. Disruptions or modifications to, or termination of, our relationship with any of our significant suppliers or customers, or financial difficulties experienced by any of our suppliers or customers that lead to curtailment or termination of their operations, could cause our businesses to suffer significant financial losses and could have a material adverse effect on our business, earnings, financial condition and/or cash flows.

Previous wording

•imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other trade protection measures imposed by the United States against foreign countries or by foreign countries against others regarding the importation of poultry, beef and pork products, gelatin and collagen products, fats and oils, and/or biofuels, in addition to operating, import or export licensing requirements imposed by various foreign countries;

Current wording

•imposition of tariffs, quotas, trade barriers and other trade protection measures imposed by the United States or foreign countries, or retaliatory trade protection measures, impacting import costs in the U.S. or foreign countries of poultry, beef and pork products, gelatin and collagen products, fats and oils, biofuels, and/or any of the Company’s other finished products, and related uncertainty and volatility in U.S. and global financial and economic conditions and commodity markets, declining consumer confidence, significant inflation and diminished expectations for the economy, as well as the imposition of operating, import or export licensing requirements;

Previous wording

•exchange controls and other limits on our ability to import raw materials, import or export finished products or to repatriate earnings from overseas, such as exchange controls in effect in China, that may limit our ability to repatriate earnings from those countries;

Current wording

•exchange controls and other limits on our ability to import raw materials, import or export finished products or to repatriate earnings from overseas, such as exchange controls in effect in China, that may limit our ability to repatriate earnings from foreign countries;

Previous wording

•compliance with, and enforcement of, a wide variety of complex U.S. and non-U.S. laws, treaties and regulations, including, without limitation, anti-bribery laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act 2010, anti-corruption laws of the EU Member States, the Brazilian corporate anti-corruption law and similar anti-corruption legislation in many jurisdictions in which we or our joint venture partners operate, as well as economic and trade sanctions enforced by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), the European Union (“EU”) institutions, the EU Member States’ authorities, or other governmental entities; and

Current wording

•compliance with, and enforcement of, a variety of complex U.S. and non-U.S. laws, treaties and regulations, including, without limitation, anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws such as the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), the U.K. Bribery Act of 2010, anti-corruption laws of the EU Member States, the Brazilian corporate anti-corruption law and similar anti-corruption legislation in many jurisdictions in which we or our joint venture partners operate, as well as economic and trade sanctions enforced by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), the European Union (“EU”) institutions, the EU Member States’ authorities, or other governmental entities; and

Previous wording

These risks and uncertainties could jeopardize or limit our ability to transact business in one or more of our international markets or in other developing markets and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, from time to time certain of our international operations make contractual prepayments to raw material suppliers in the ordinary course of business, which may subject the Company to financial risk should any such supplier experience financial difficulties, bankruptcy or cease operations.

Current wording

These risks and uncertainties could jeopardize or limit our ability to transact business in one or more of our international markets or in other developing markets and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. In addition, from time to time certain of our international operations make contractual prepayments to raw material suppliers in the ordinary course of business, which may subject the Company to financial risk should any such supplier experience financial difficulties (e.g., bankruptcy) or cease operations.

Previous wording

Seasonal factors and weather, including the physical impacts of climate changes, can impact the availability, quality and volume of raw materials that we process and negatively affect our operations.

Current wording

Seasonal factors and weather, including the physical impacts of climate related changes, can impact the availability, quality and volume of raw materials that we process and negatively affect our operations.

Previous wording

There is a growing global concern that carbon dioxide and other GHG in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency of extreme weather and natural disasters. We are subject to physical, operational, transitional and financial risks associated with climate change and global, regional and local weather conditions, as well as legal, regulatory and market responses to climate change. Certain jurisdictions in which we operate have either imposed, or are considering imposing, new or increasingly stringent legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the potential effects of climate change, including regulation and reduction of GHG and potential carbon pricing programs. These new or increasingly stringent legal or regulatory requirements could result in significantly increased costs of compliance and additional investments in facilities and equipment, and reduced raw material supplies in areas where these requirements limit or eliminate livestock operations. While we assess climate related regulatory risks as part of our risk management process, we are unable to predict the scope, nature and timing of any new or increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations and therefore cannot predict the ultimate impact of such laws and regulations on our business or financial results. We continue to monitor existing and proposed laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate and consider actions we may take to potentially mitigate the unfavorable impact, if any, of such laws or regulations.

Current wording

There is global concern that carbon dioxide and other GHG in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather patterns and the frequency of extreme weather and natural disasters. We are subject to physical, operational, transitional and financial risks associated with any such climate related changes and global, regional and local weather conditions, as well as legal, regulatory and market responses to climate change. Certain jurisdictions in which we operate have either imposed, or are considering imposing, new or increasingly stringent legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the potential effects of climate change, including regulation and reduction of GHG and potential carbon pricing programs. These new or increasingly stringent legal or regulatory requirements could result in significantly increased costs of compliance and additional investments in facilities and equipment, and reduced raw material supplies in areas where these requirements limit or eliminate livestock operations. Our risk management process includes assessment of climate related regulatory risks, but we may be unable to predict the scope, nature and timing of any new or increasingly stringent environmental laws and regulations or the ultimate impact of such laws and regulations on our business or financial results. We continue to monitor existing and proposed laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate and consider actions we may take to potentially mitigate the unfavorable impact, if any, of such laws or regulations.

Previous wording

The quantity of raw materials available to us is impacted by seasonal factors, including holidays, when raw material volumes decline, and cold weather, which can impact the collection of raw materials. In addition, warm weather can adversely affect the quality of raw materials processed and our yield on production due to more rapidly degrading raw materials. In addition to seasonal impacts, depending on the location of our facilities and those of our suppliers, our operations could be subject to weather impacts, including the physical impacts of climate changes, changes in rainfall patterns, water shortages, changing sea levels, changing storm patterns and intensities and changing temperature levels. Physical damage, flooding, excessive snowfall or drought resulting from changing climate patterns could adversely impact our costs and business operations, the availability and costs of our raw materials, and the supply and demand for our end products. These effects could be material to our results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. The quality and volume of the finished products that we are able to produce could be negatively impacted by unseasonable or severe weather or unexpected declines in the volume of raw materials available during holidays, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, severe weather events may also impact our ability to collect or process raw materials or to transport finished products.

Current wording

The quantity of raw materials available to us is impacted by seasonal factors, including holidays, when raw material volumes decline, and cold weather, which can impact the collection of raw materials. Warm weather can also adversely affect the quality of raw materials processed and our yield on production due to more rapid degradation. In addition to seasonal impacts, depending on the location of our facilities and those of our suppliers, our operations could be subject to weather impacts, including the physical impacts of climate changes, changes in rainfall patterns, water shortages, changing sea levels, changing storm patterns and intensities and changing temperature levels. Physical damage, flooding, excessive snowfall or drought resulting from changing climate patterns could adversely impact our costs and business operations, the availability and costs of our raw materials, and the supply and demand for our end products. These effects could be material to our results of operations, liquidity or capital resources. The quality and volume of the finished products that we are able to produce could be negatively impacted by unseasonable or severe weather or unexpected declines in the volume of raw materials available during holidays, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, severe weather events may also impact our ability to collect or process raw materials or to transport finished products.

Previous wording

In recent years the EU has adopted new mechanisms to allow (and encourage) claims by consumers, including in collective litigation forms. The civil liability risks in Europe in relation to misleading advertising are material, and increasing, and on December 8, 2024, Directive (EU) 2024/2853, the EU’s revised Product Liability Directive (“PLD”), entered into force, which must be transposed into national legislation of the EU Member States by December 9, 2026. The revised PLD introduces a number of significant changes that increase liability risks for companies distributing their products to EU consumers. Direct civil enforcement before EU institutions or courts is not available, but EU law requires the EU Member States to enhance consumer protection at the national level by requiring every EU Member State to allow consumer representative bodies to take civil claims on behalf of consumers for breaches of certain EU consumer laws.

Current wording

In recent years the EU has adopted new mechanisms to allow (and encourage) claims by consumers, including in collective litigation forms. The civil liability risks in Europe in relation to misleading advertising are material and increasing. On December 8, 2024, Directive (EU) 2024/2853, the EU’s revised Product Liability Directive (“PLD”), which must be transposed into national legislation of the EU Member States by December 9, 2026, introduced a number of significant changes that increase liability risks for companies distributing their products to EU consumers. Direct civil enforcement before EU institutions or courts is not available, but EU law requires EU Member States to enhance consumer protection at the national level by requiring every EU Member State to allow consumer representative bodies to take civil claims on behalf of consumers for breaches of certain EU consumer laws.

Previous wording

Our facilities are subject to various federal, state, provincial and local laws, rules and regulations including environmental and other permitting requirements of the countries in which we operate and our facilities are located. Periodically, these permits may be reviewed and subject to amendment or withdrawal. Applications for an extension or renewal of various permits may be subject to challenge by community and environmental groups and others. In the event of a casualty, condemnation, work stoppage, permitting withdrawal or delay, severe weather event, cyber-attack or other unscheduled shutdown involving one of our facilities, in a majority of our markets we would utilize a nearby operating facility to continue to serve our customers in the affected market; however, in certain markets we do not have alternate operating facilities. If any of these events occur in such markets, we may experience an interruption in our ability to service our customers and to procure raw materials, and potentially an impairment of the value of that facility. Any of these circumstances may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations in those markets. In addition, after an operating facility affected by such an event and unscheduled shutdown is restored, there could be no assurance that customers who in the interim choose to use alternative disposal services would return to use our services.

Current wording

Our facilities are subject to various federal, state, provincial and local laws, rules and regulations including environmental and other permitting requirements of the countries in which we operate and our facilities are located. Periodically, these permits may be reviewed and subject to amendment or withdrawal. Applications for an extension or renewal of various permits may be subject to challenge by community and environmental groups and others. In the event of a casualty, condemnation, work stoppage, permitting withdrawal or delay, severe weather event, cyber-attack or other unscheduled shutdown involving one of our facilities, in a majority of our markets we would utilize a nearby operating facility to continue to serve our customers in the affected market; however, in certain markets we do not have alternate operating facilities. If any of these events occur in such markets, we may experience an interruption in our ability to service our customers and to procure raw materials, and potentially an impairment of the value of that facility. Any of these circumstances may materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations in those markets. In addition, after an operating facility affected by such an event or unscheduled shutdown is restored, customers who in the interim choose to use alternative disposal services may not return to use our services.

Previous wording

Darling and DGD may use commodity derivative instruments to hedge their exposures to various types of financial risk. If these instruments are not effective or increase Darling’s or DGD’s exposure to unexpected events or risks, Darling or DGD may incur losses. In addition, both Darling or DGD may be required to incur additional costs in connection with any future regulation of derivative instruments applicable to either or both.

Current wording

Darling and the DGD Joint Venture have used and may continue to use commodity derivative instruments in the future to hedge their exposures to various types of financial risk. If these instruments are not effective or increase Darling’s or the DGD Joint Venture’s exposure to unexpected events or risks, Darling or the DGD Joint Venture may incur losses. In addition, both Darling or the DGD Joint Venture may be required to incur additional costs in connection with any future regulation of derivative instruments applicable to either or both.

Showing the first 40 of 107 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.

Rearranged current paragraphs (9)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The DGD Joint Venture is subject to and dependent on governmental energy policies and programs, such as the National Renewable Fuel Standard Program (“RFS”) and low carbon fuel standards (“LCFS”) (such as those in place in the state of California), which positively impact the demand for and price of renewable diesel. Any changes to, a failure to enforce or a discontinuation of any of these programs could have a material adverse effect on the DGD Joint Venture. Further, these programs are regularly subject to expirations and renewals which, at any time, could be delayed or not renewed, and other administrative and political review which could result in limitations or other policy adjustments by the respective administrations overseeing them. See the section entitled“Risk Factors-Risks Related to our Business-Our renewable energy businesses, including the DGD Joint Venture, are highly dependent on government programs, incentives and regulatory frameworks, which are subject to change and uncertainty.”

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Government incentives related to renewable fuels were material to our results of operations in fiscal 2025, so any legal challenges or changes to, a failure to enforce, reductions in the mandated volumes under, or suspending or discontinuing any of these programs could have a negative impact on our business and results of operations.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

In addition, future developments, such as more aggressive enforcement policies, new laws or discoveries of currently unknown contamination conditions, may also require expenditures that may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. For example, regulations are emerging regarding per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) continue to evolve due to potential health and environmental risks. In the U.S., the EPA has designated perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”) – as “hazardous substances” under CERCLA and adopted the primary drinking water standards for certain PFAS, with which public water systems must comply by 2029. The EPA is also advancing regulations to list certain PFAS as hazardous constituents under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EU legislators are taking steps to adopt a comprehensive legislative measure simultaneously restricting a large number of PFAS. In February 2023, the European Chemical Agency (“ECHA”) published a proposal to restrict 10,000+ PFAS under Annex XVII of

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 concerning the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of Chemicals (“REACH”). ECHA’s committees for Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis have been evaluating the proposal based on a sector-based approach to address the specificities of such substances, and a consolidated opinion will be sent to the European Commission, which will make the ultimate decision in consultation with the EU Member States. While Darling does not manufacture or use PFAS, the raw materials we process could contain PFAS as could the influent waters from city supply services and/or production wells. If PFAS is contained in these sources, it could persist in the outputs of our production, including wastewater treatment discharges, wastewater-derived residuals, and/or finished products. New or expanded regulation, enforcement actions, remediation obligations, product impacts or private litigation related to PFAS could result in material costs, operational disruptions or reputational harm.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

In addition, other diseases that are highly contagious within a species, but do not affect other animals and are not transmissible to humans, such as the porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and African Swine Fever (“ASF”), may significantly impact production of the susceptible livestock or animal species in a country or region. ASF is a viral and highly contagious disease of pigs and wild boar, for which no cures or approved vaccines are available in the United States as of the date of this report. In the past few years, ASF has become widespread in multiple Chinese, Vietnamese and Philippine provinces and has been reported in Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Timor-Leste, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand in South East Asia and the People's Democratic Republic of Korea, the Republic of Korea, Mongolia, Bhutan and India. In April 2021, the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (“MARA”) issued the “Work plan for Regional Prevention and Control of African Swine Fever and Other Major Animal Diseases (Trial)”, which divided the entire country into five regions (South-Central, Eastern, Northern, South-West, and North-west). Pig movement is restricted and ASF-free zones were created. Only pigs from ASF-free zones, breeding pigs and piglets are allowed to move beyond their respective region. Such restrictions on the movement of pigs from one region to another may affect slaughter numbers within certain regions and thereby reduce volumes of raw material supplied to our locations that, within the same region, process blood and make collagen from pork skins.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

States are classified as having a negligible BSE risk. Also, the United Kingdom (with the exception of Northern Ireland), as a former a member of the EU is classified as controlled BSE risk. A change in the BSE status of one or more EU Member States may have a negative impact on Darling Ingredients International. Under EU legislation, imported products from outside the EU must meet the same safety standards as products produced in EU Member States. The TSE Regulation imposes strict import requirements related to TSEs for live animals and animal by-products, which depend on the BSE status of Third Countries.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The Animal By-Products Regulation establishes rules intended to prevent the outbreak of certain diseases such as BSE. A BSE outbreak or other event viewed as hazardous to animal or human health could also lead to the adoption of more stringent rules on the use and disposal of animal by-products, which could require Darling Ingredients International to change its production processes and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

In addition, in August 2024, EU Regulation 2024/1689 on AI (“EU AI Act”) entered into force, with most rules going into effect in August 2026. The EU AI Act governs the development and deployment of AI placed on the EU market, used in the EU, or where the output is used or intended to be used within the EU. The EU AI Act aims to ensure the safe and ethical development of AI technologies, and establishes a risk-based regulatory framework, categorizing the use of AI systems into four levels according to the perceived level of risk. In case of non-compliance, the fine threshold is set at 35 million euros or 7% of total annual worldwide turnover, whichever is higher, and regulators have the power to remove non-compliant products from the EU market. Achieving compliance with the EU AI Act may require significant investments in adapting AI systems to meet regulatory requirements. This could include implementing enhanced data governance, ensuring human oversight, and providing detailed technical documentation, which may increase costs and deployment timelines.

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The impact of these cybersecurity, privacy, and AI laws and orders on us and others in our industry is uncertain. We also may be required to expend significant resources to prepare for and comply with the evolving standards. We could be adversely affected if state, federal or international data privacy or cybersecurity laws or regulations are interpreted in a manner that would require changes in our business practices, or if governing jurisdictions interpret or implement their legislation or regulations in ways that negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.