Skip to main content

PATTERSON UTI ENERGY INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 10, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 10, 2026

PTEN$9.92-0.3%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-11.

0000889900-25-000034

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-10.

0000889900-26-000013

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 219 previous paragraphs and 221 current paragraphs.

184 unchanged; 33 reworded; 2 added; 1 removed; 1 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (2)

Current report

•diversion of management or workforce attention;

Current report

Although we utilize various procedures and controls to mitigate our exposure to or limit the effects of the risks described above, cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events are evolving and unpredictable. In addition, there has been an increase in state-sponsored cyberattacks, which are often conducted by capable, well-funded groups. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technologies amplifies these concerns. As threat actors adopt and deploy AI tools, the speed and sophistication of cyber threats and privacy risks may increase across our environment and those of our customers, vendors and suppliers. As we and our service providers begin to integrate AI-enabled tools, those tools may be targeted or misused in ways that compromise data or enable harmful outputs. Additionally, AI outputs may be inaccurate, biased or unreliable, which could result in legal, regulatory or reputational harm. Misuse could create compliance or reputational risks and lead to legal exposure. Third parties may allege copyright infringement, intellectual property violations or misappropriation related to outputs. In addition, the legal and regulatory landscape governing the development and use of AI is rapidly evolving and remains uncertain, and new or changing laws, regulations or enforcement approaches could increase compliance costs, restrict the use or functionality of AI-enabled tools, or expose us to regulatory scrutiny, litigation or other liability.
Removed paragraphs (1)

Previous report

Governmental, scientific, and public concern over the threat of climate change arising from GHG emissions has resulted in increasing political risks in the United States. A number of new GHG-related initiatives went into effect under the prior Biden Administration, which initiatives may be modified or reversed under the Trump Administration. The Trump Administration may diverge from the Biden Administration’s positions and could withdraw from or otherwise roll back existing GHG commitments. For example, in January 2025, President Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement. While it is not possible at this time to predict exactly which and to what extent such commitments will be modified, and how any such actions may impact our business, such actions could prompt more activity from state and local legislative bodies and administrative agencies to pass stricter GHG laws, regulations, and other binding commitments.
Reworded paragraphs (33)

Previous wording

•Our current backlog of contract drilling revenue may decline and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.

Current wording

•Our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined in recent years and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.

Previous wording

•Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to shareholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.

Current wording

•Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.

Previous wording

•domestic and international military, political, economic, health and weather conditions, including the impacts of war, including the impact of the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East and the continuation of, or any escalation in the severity of, these conflicts, or terrorist activity, pandemics and other unexpected disasters or events,

Current wording

•domestic and international military, political, economic, health and weather conditions, including the impacts of war, including the impact of the ongoing armed conflicts between Russia and Ukraine and in the Middle East and actions by the United States in Venezuela and other countries, and the continuation of, or any escalation in the severity of, these conflicts or actions, or terrorist activity, pandemics and other unexpected disasters or events,

Previous wording

All of these factors are beyond our control. Commodity prices have historically been volatile, but have been relatively range-bound since the end of 2022. The current demand for equipment and services remains impacted by macro conditions, including commodity prices, geopolitical environment, inflationary pressures, economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as customer consolidation and focus by exploration and production companies and service companies on capital returns. Oil prices averaged $70.73 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2024 and closed at $73.52 per barrel on February 3, 2025. Natural gas prices (based on the Henry Hub Spot Market Price) averaged $2.45 per MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2024 and closed at $3.30 per MMBtu on February 3, 2025.

Current wording

All of these factors are beyond our control. Commodity prices have historically been volatile but were relatively range-bound from the end of 2022 through the first quarter of 2025. The current demand for equipment and services remains impacted by macro conditions, including commodity prices, geopolitical environment, changes to international tariffs and trade policies, inflationary pressures, economic conditions in the United States and elsewhere, as well as customer consolidation and focus by exploration and production companies and service companies on capital returns. During the second quarter of 2025, global economic conditions deteriorated, in part, because of enacted and proposed trade policies and tariffs by the United States and other governments, as well as uncertainty regarding potential future changes to global trade policies and tariffs. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2025, OPEC+ countries began phasing out voluntary crude oil production cuts, leading to an increase in global supply. These developments, combined with rising geopolitical tensions—particularly in the Middle East—heightened uncertainty in global energy markets, which contributed to a decline in our share price, lowered average crude oil futures prices and increased uncertainty regarding the future economic environment in which we operate. During the second half of 2025, global economic conditions and the global energy market remained uncertain, with ongoing effects from trade policy uncertainty, the phase-out of voluntary crude oil production cuts by OPEC+ countries and downward pressure on crude oil futures prices. While the full effects are yet to be determined, prolonged trade tensions and sustained lower crude oil futures prices could adversely affect our future outlook on activity and profitability. Oil prices averaged $59.62 per barrel in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $61.60 per barrel on February 2, 2026. Natural gas prices (based on the Henry Hub Spot Market Price) averaged $3.73 per MMBtu in the fourth quarter of 2025 and closed at $4.40 per MMBtu on February 2, 2026.

Previous wording

Our industry is highly competitive, and available drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, and drilling products often exceeds the demand for such equipment and products. A low commodity price environment or capital spending reductions by our customers due to additional customer consolidation, investor requirements or other reasons can result in substantially more equipment and products being available than are needed to meet demand. Low commodity prices and a rise in new and upgraded equipment or products can result in excess capacity and substantial competition for a declining number of drilling services and completion services contracts and drilling products rentals and sales.

Current wording

Our industry is highly competitive, and available drilling services equipment, completion services equipment and drilling products often exceed the demand for such equipment and products. A low commodity price environment or capital spending reductions by our customers due to additional customer consolidation, investor requirements or other reasons can result in substantially more equipment and products being available than are needed to meet demand. Low commodity prices and a rise in new and upgraded equipment or products can result in excess capacity and substantial competition for a declining number of drilling services and completion services contracts and drilling products rentals and sales.

Previous wording

We periodically seek to increase the prices on our services to offset rising costs, earn returns on our capital investment, and otherwise generate higher returns for our stockholders. However, we operate in a very competitive industry, and we are not always successful in raising or maintaining our existing prices. Even if we are able to increase our prices, we may not be able to do so at a rate that is sufficient to offset rising costs, including capital expenditures, without adversely affecting our activity levels. The inability to maintain our pricing and to increase our pricing as costs, including capital expenditures, increase could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In addition, we may be unable to replace fixed-term contracts that expire or are terminated early, extend expiring contracts or obtain new contracts in the spot market, and the rates and other material terms under any new or extended contracts may be on substantially less favorable rates and terms.

Current wording

We periodically seek to increase the prices on our services to offset rising costs, earn returns on our capital investment and otherwise generate higher returns for our stockholders. However, we operate in a very competitive industry, and we are not always successful in raising or maintaining our existing prices. Even if we are able to increase our prices, we may not be able to do so at a rate that is sufficient to offset rising costs, including capital expenditures, without adversely affecting our activity. The inability to maintain our pricing and to increase our pricing as costs, including capital expenditures, increase could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. In addition, we may be unable to replace fixed-term contracts that expire or are terminated early, extend expiring contracts or obtain new contracts in the spot market, and the rates and other material terms under any new or extended contracts may be on substantially less favorable rates and terms.

Previous wording

A surplus of operable land drilling rigs, other drilling services equipment and drilling products, increasing rig specialization and surplus of completion services equipment, which can be exacerbated by capital spending reductions by our customers, could affect the fair market value of our drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, and drilling products, which in turn could result in additional impairments of our assets. A prolonged period of lower oil and natural gas prices or changes in customer preferences and requirements could result in future impairment to our long-lived assets. For example, we recognized impairment charges of $3.8 million, $7.0 million and $4.5 million in 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively.

Current wording

A surplus of operable land drilling rigs, other drilling services equipment and drilling products, increasing rig specialization and surplus of completion services equipment, which can be exacerbated by capital spending reductions by our customers, could affect the fair market value of our drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, and drilling products, which in turn could result in additional impairments of our assets. A prolonged period of lower oil and natural gas prices or changes in customer preferences and requirements could result in future impairment to our long-lived assets. For example, we recognized impairment charges of $32.4 million, $3.8 million and $7.0 million in 2025, 2024 and 2023, respectively.

Previous wording

Our current backlog of contract drilling revenue may decline and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.

Current wording

Our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined in recent years and may not ultimately be realized, as fixed-term contracts may in certain instances be terminated without an early termination payment.

Previous wording

Fixed-term drilling contracts customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to us if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, in certain circumstances, for example, destruction of a drilling rig that is not replaced within a specified period of time, our bankruptcy, or a breach of our contract obligations, the customer may not be obligated to make an early termination payment to us. Additionally, during depressed market conditions or otherwise, customers may be unable to satisfy their contractual obligations or may seek to terminate, suspend or renegotiate or otherwise fail to honor their contractual obligations, including as a result of their bankruptcy. In addition, we may not be able to perform under these contracts due to events beyond our control, and our customers may seek to terminate or renegotiate our contracts for various reasons, including those described above. As a result, we may be unable to realize all of our current contract drilling backlog. In addition, the termination, suspension or renegotiation of fixed-term contracts without the receipt of early termination payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Current wording

Fixed-term drilling contracts customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to us if a contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, in certain circumstances, for example, destruction of a drilling rig that is not replaced within a specified period of time, our bankruptcy, or a breach of our contract obligations, the customer may not be obligated to make an early termination payment to us. Additionally, during depressed market conditions or otherwise, customers may be unable to satisfy their contractual obligations or may seek to terminate, suspend or renegotiate or otherwise fail to honor their contractual obligations, including as a result of their bankruptcy. In addition, we may not be able to perform under these contracts due to events beyond our control, and our customers may seek to terminate or renegotiate our contracts for various reasons, including those described above. As a result, we may be unable to realize all of our contract drilling backlog. In addition, the termination, suspension or renegotiation of fixed-term contracts without the receipt of early termination payments could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, our contract drilling backlog in the United States for future revenues under term contracts, which we define as contracts with a duration of six months or more, was approximately $426 million. Please see Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report for a description of our calculation of backlog. Our contract drilling backlog may decline, as fixed-term drilling contract coverage over time may not be offset by new contracts or may be reduced by price adjustments to existing contracts, including as a result of a decline in the price of oil and natural gas, capital spending reductions by our customers or other factors. For these and other reasons, our contract drilling backlog may not generate sufficient liquidity for us during periods of reduced demand for our services or otherwise.

Current wording

In recent years, due to market conditions and other factors, our backlog of contract drilling revenue has declined. As of December 31, 2025, our contract drilling backlog in the United States for future revenues under term contracts, which we define as contracts with a duration of six months or more, was approximately $291 million, as compared to approximately $426 million, approximately $700 million and approximately $830 million, as of December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022, respectively. Please see Note 3 of Notes to consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of this Report for a description of our calculation of backlog. Our contract drilling backlog may continue to decline, as fixed-term drilling contract coverage over time may not be offset by new contracts or may be reduced by price adjustments to existing contracts, including as a result of a decline in the price of oil and natural gas, capital spending reductions by our customers, oversupply of drilling rigs or other factors. For these and other reasons, our contract drilling backlog may not generate sufficient liquidity for us during periods of reduced demand for our services or otherwise.

Previous wording

The market for our services and products is characterized by continual technological and process developments that have resulted in, and will likely continue to result in, substantial improvements in the functionality and performance, including environmental performance, of drilling services equipment, completion services equipment, and drilling products. Our customers are increasingly demanding the services of newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment, as well as new and improved technology, such as drilling automation technology and lower-emissions operations and services, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. Accordingly, we may have to allocate a higher proportion of our capital expenditures to maintain and improve existing rigs and completion services and other equipment, purchase and construct newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment to meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers, and develop new and improved technology, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. In addition, technological changes, process improvements and other factors that increase operational efficiencies could continue to result in oil and natural gas wells being drilled and completed more quickly, which could reduce the number of revenue earning days. Technological and process developments in the completion services and other drilling services businesses could have similar effects.

Current wording

The market for our services and products is characterized by continual technological and process developments that have resulted in, and will likely continue to result in, substantial improvements in the functionality and performance, including environmental performance, of drilling services equipment, completion services equipment and drilling products. Our customers are increasingly demanding the services of newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment, as well as new and improved technology, such as drilling and completions automation technology and lower-emissions operations and services, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. Accordingly, we may have to allocate a higher proportion of our capital expenditures to maintain and improve existing rigs and completion services and other equipment, purchase and construct newer, higher specification drilling rigs and completion services and other equipment to meet the increasingly sophisticated needs of our customers, and develop new and improved technology, specialized drill bit solutions and data analytics. In addition, technological changes, process improvements and other factors that increase operational efficiencies could continue to result in oil and natural gas wells being drilled and completed more quickly, which could reduce the number of revenue earning days. Technological and process developments in the completion services and other drilling services businesses could have similar effects.

Previous wording

Business consolidations within the oil and natural gas industry in recent years have resulted in some of our largest customers combining and using their size and purchasing power to seek economies of scale and pricing concessions. Continuing consolidation within the industry may result in reduced capital spending within the industry generally and by our customers specifically, all of which may lead to decreased demand for our products and services. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain our level of business and profitability with a customer after its consolidation or replace that business and profit with other customers. Additionally, consolidation among our competitors could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the industry. As a result, the acquisition of one or more of our key customers or consolidation among our competitors may have a significant adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We are unable to predict what effect further consolidation in the industry may have on capital spending by our customers, prices that we can charge, our selling strategies, our competitive position, our ability to retain customers or our ability to negotiate favorable agreements with our customers, and our revenue and profitability.

Current wording

Business consolidations within the oil and natural gas industry in recent years have resulted in some of our largest customers combining and using their size and purchasing power to seek economies of scale and pricing concessions. Continuing consolidation within the industry may result in reduced capital spending within the industry generally and by our customers specifically, all of which may lead to decreased demand for our products and services. There is no assurance that we will be able to maintain our level of business and profitability with a customer after its consolidation or replace that business and profit with other customers. Additionally, consolidation among our competitors could significantly alter industry conditions and competition within the industry. As a result, the consolidation of one or more of our customers, particularly key customers, or consolidation among other oil and gas operators may have a significant adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. We are unable to predict what effect further consolidation in the industry may have on capital spending by our customers, prices that we can charge, our selling strategies, our competitive position, our ability to retain customers or our ability to negotiate favorable agreements with our customers, and our revenue and profitability.

Previous wording

With respect to our consolidated operating revenues in 2024, we received approximately 53% from our ten largest customers, approximately 38% from our five largest customers and 11% from our largest customer. The loss of, or reduction in business from, one or more of our larger customers, due to consolidation or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Current wording

With respect to our consolidated operating revenues in 2025, we received approximately 57% from our ten largest customers, approximately 39% from our five largest customers and approximately 12% from our largest customer. The loss of, or reduction in business from, one or more of our larger customers, due to consolidation or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.

Previous wording

Our operations are increasingly dependent on effective and secure information technologies and services, including our own systems and the systems of third party vendors and service providers upon which we rely, such as those providing cloud services to us. Threats to information technology systems associated with cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks continue to grow, and include, among other things, storms and natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, theft, viruses, malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, design defects, human error, or complications encountered as existing systems are maintained, repaired, replaced, or upgraded. Risks associated with these threats include, among other things:

Current wording

Our operations are increasingly dependent on effective and secure information and operational technologies and services, including our own systems and the systems of third-party vendors and service providers upon which we rely, such as those providing cloud services to us. Threats to information and operational technology systems associated with cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents or attacks continue to grow, and include, among other things, storms and natural disasters, terrorist attacks, utility outages, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and systems, theft, viruses, malware, ransomware, denial-of-service attacks, design defects, human error or complications encountered as existing systems are maintained, repaired, replaced or upgraded. Risks associated with these threats include, among other things:

Previous wording

Some of our office personnel are on a “remote work” model. This model has significantly increased the use of remote networking and online conferencing services that enable employees to work outside of our corporate infrastructure and, in some cases, use their own personal devices. This may expose us to additional cybersecurity risks or related incidents. Additionally, geopolitical tensions or conflicts may further heighten the risk of cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events. In particular, sophisticated nation state actors have targeted critical infrastructure and may continue to do so in the future.

Current wording

During 2025, we significantly reduced the proportion of our office personnel who are on a “remote work” model; however, there remains continued usage of remote networking and online conferencing services that enable employees to work outside of our corporate infrastructure and, in some cases, use their own personal devices. This may expose us to additional cybersecurity risks or related incidents. Additionally, geopolitical tensions or conflicts may further heighten the risk of cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events. In particular, sophisticated nation state actors have targeted critical infrastructure and may continue to do so in the future.

Previous wording

Although we utilize various procedures and controls to mitigate our exposure to or limit the effects of the risks described above, cybersecurity attacks and other cyber events are evolving and unpredictable. In addition, there has been an increase in state-sponsored cyberattacks, which are often conducted by capable, well-funded groups. The rapid evolution and increased adoption of artificial intelligence technologies amplifies these concerns. There can be no assurance that the procedures and controls that we implement, or that our third party service providers implement, will be sufficient to protect our people, systems, information or other property. Moreover, we have no control over the information technology systems of our customers, suppliers, and others with which our systems may connect and communicate. As a result, the occurrence of a cyber incident could go unnoticed for a period of time. Even when an attack has been detected, it is not always immediately apparent what the full nature and scope of any potential harm may be, or how best to remediate it. We self-insure most of our cybersecurity risks, and any such incident could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. As cyber incidents continue to evolve, we may be required to incur additional costs to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate or remediate the effects of cyber incidents.

Current wording

There can be no assurance that the procedures and controls that we implement, or that our third-party service providers implement, will be sufficient to protect our people, systems, information or other property. Moreover, we have no control over the information and operational technology systems of our customers, suppliers, and others with which our systems may connect and communicate. As a result, the occurrence of a cyber incident could go unnoticed for a period of time. Even when an attack has been detected, it is not always immediately apparent what the full nature and scope of any potential harm may be, or how best to remediate it. We self-insure most of our cybersecurity risks, and any such incident could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. As cyber incidents continue to evolve, we may be required to incur additional costs to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate or remediate the effects of cyber incidents.

Previous wording

•successfully integrate additional equipment, acquired or developed technology or other assets or businesses, including the combination of our business with the businesses of NexTier and Ulterra, into our operations and internal controls, including financial reporting disclosure and enterprise resource planning, cybersecurity and information technology systems,

Current wording

•successfully integrate additional equipment, acquired or developed technology or other assets or businesses into our operations and internal controls, including financial reporting disclosure and enterprise resource planning, cybersecurity and information technology systems,

Previous wording

Our failure to achieve consolidation savings, to integrate acquired businesses and technology and other assets into our existing operations successfully or to minimize any unforeseen operational difficulties could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may incur liabilities arising from events occurring prior to any completed acquisitions, prior to our establishment of adequate compliance oversight or in connection with disputes over acquired or developed technology. While we generally seek to obtain indemnities or insurance for liabilities arising from events occurring before such acquisitions, we may be unable to do so, and any indemnities or insurance we do obtain will be limited in amount and duration, and indemnities may be held to be unenforceable or the seller may not be able to indemnify us.

Current wording

Our failure to achieve consolidation savings, to integrate acquired businesses and technology and other assets into our existing operations successfully or to minimize any unforeseen operational difficulties could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, we may incur liabilities arising from events occurring prior to any completed acquisitions, prior to our establishment of adequate compliance oversight or in connection with disputes over acquired or developed technology. While we generally seek to obtain indemnities or insurance for liabilities arising from events occurring before such acquisitions, we may be unable to do so, and any indemnities or insurance we do obtain will be limited in amount and duration. Additionally, indemnities may be held to be unenforceable or the seller may not be able to indemnify us.

Previous wording

We rely extensively on information systems and technology to manage our business and summarize operating results. We are in the process of implementing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system that expands and enhances one of our existing ERP systems to address the operations of our combined company. This ERP system will replace our existing operating and financial systems. The ERP system is designed to accurately maintain our financial records, enhance operational functionality and provide timely information to our management team related to the operation of our integrated business. The ERP system implementation process will require the investment of significant personnel and financial resources. We may be unable to successfully implement the ERP system without experiencing delays, increased costs and other difficulties. If we are unable to successfully design and implement the new ERP system as planned, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted. Additionally, if we do not effectively implement the ERP system as planned or the ERP system does not operate as intended, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could be adversely affected or our ability to assess those controls adequately could be delayed.

Current wording

We rely extensively on information systems and technology to manage our business and summarize operating results. We are in the process of implementing a new enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) system that expands and enhances one of our existing ERP systems to address the operations of our combined company. This ERP system will replace our existing operating and financial systems. The ERP system is designed to accurately maintain our financial records, enhance operational functionality and provide timely information to our management team related to the operation of our integrated business. The ERP system implementation process has required and will continue to require the investment of significant personnel and financial resources. We may be unable to successfully implement the ERP system without experiencing delays, increased costs and other difficulties. If we are unable to successfully design and implement the new ERP system as planned, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted. Additionally, if we do not effectively implement the ERP system as planned or the ERP system does not operate as intended, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could be adversely affected or our ability to assess those controls adequately could be delayed.

Previous wording

Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas. The impact of the changing demand for oil and natural gas may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Additionally, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar geothermal, tidal, and biofuels) or increased focus on reducing the use of oil and natural gas (such as governmental mandates that ban the sale of new gasoline-powered automobiles, and new legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which contains tax inducements and other provisions that incentivize investment, development, and deployment of alternative energy sources and technologies) could reduce demand for oil and natural gas and therefore for our services, which would lead to a reduction in our revenues.

Current wording

Fuel conservation measures, alternative fuel requirements and increasing consumer demand for alternatives to oil and natural gas could reduce demand for oil and natural gas. The impact of the changing demand for oil and natural gas may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Additionally, the increased competitiveness of alternative energy sources (such as wind, solar, geothermal, tidal and biofuels) or increased focus on reducing the use of oil and natural gas (such as governmental mandates that ban the sale of new gasoline-powered automobiles, and relatively recent legislation such as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “Inflation Reduction Act”), which contains tax inducements and other provisions that incentivize investment, development, and deployment of alternative energy sources and technologies) could reduce demand for oil and natural gas and therefore for our services, which would lead to a reduction in our revenues. On July 4, 2025, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (“OBBBA”) was enacted with effective dates for provisions between 2025 and 2027. The OBBBA reduces or accelerates phase-outs of many of the tax inducements and incentives supporting alternative energy sources and technologies in the Inflation Reduction Act, which will likely lessen the potential impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on reducing demand for oil and natural gas.

Previous wording

Various federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives have been or could be undertaken that could result in additional requirements or restrictions being imposed on hydraulic fracturing operations or result in the failure to obtain or difficulty or delay in obtaining required permits, renewals or authorizations. For example, legislation and/or regulations have been adopted in many U.S. states that require additional disclosure regarding chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Legislation, regulations, and/or policies have also been adopted at the state level that impose other types of requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations (such as limits on operations in the event of certain levels of seismic activity). Additional legislation and/or regulations have been adopted or are being considered at the state and local level that could impose further chemical disclosure or other regulatory requirements (such as prohibitions on hydraulic fracturing operations in certain areas) and/or other limitations on hydraulic fracturing operations via time, place, and manner restrictions) that could affect our operations, and it is possible that these state and local efforts may increase in the absence of federal actions and/or in light of federal regulatory uncertainty. Four states (New York, Maryland, Vermont, and Washington) have banned the use of high volume hydraulic fracturing, Oregon has adopted a five-year moratorium, California has taken regulatory action to phase out hydraulic fracturing permitting and activities in the state, and Colorado has enacted legislation providing local governments with regulatory authority over hydraulic fracturing operations. Local jurisdictions in some states have adopted ordinances that restrict or in certain cases prohibit the use of hydraulic fracturing, although many of these ordinances have been challenged and some have been overturned. The adoption of any future federal, state or local laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting or banning, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas and oil wells and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

Various federal and state legislative and regulatory initiatives have been or could be undertaken that could result in additional requirements or restrictions being imposed on hydraulic fracturing operations or result in the failure to obtain or difficulty or delay in obtaining required permits, renewals or authorizations. For example, legislation and/or regulations have been adopted in many U.S. states that require additional disclosure regarding chemicals used in the hydraulic fracturing process. Legislation, regulations and/or policies have also been adopted at the state level that impose other types of requirements on hydraulic fracturing operations (such as limits on operations in the event of certain levels of seismic activity). Additional legislation and/or regulations have been adopted or are being considered at the state and local level that could impose further chemical disclosure or other regulatory requirements (such as prohibitions on hydraulic fracturing operations in certain areas) and/or attempt to impose bans and other limitations on hydraulic fracturing operations via time, place and manner restrictions that could affect our operations. It is possible that these state and local efforts may increase in the absence of federal actions and/or in light of federal regulatory uncertainty. The adoption of any future federal, state or local laws or regulations imposing reporting obligations on, or limiting or banning, the hydraulic fracturing process could make it more difficult to complete natural gas and oil wells and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

The physical and regulatory effects of climate change could have a negative impact on our operations, our customers’ operations and the overall demand for our customers’ products and, accordingly, our services. There is an increasing focus of local, state, regional, national and international regulatory bodies on GHG emissions and climate change issues. Legislation to regulate GHG emissions has periodically been introduced in the U.S. Congress, and there has been a wide-ranging policy debate, both in the United States and internationally, regarding the impact of these gases and possible means for their regulation. These efforts have included consideration of cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting, tracking programs, attestation requirements and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. Some of the proposals would require industries to meet stringent new standards that would require substantial reductions in carbon emissions. Those reductions could be costly and difficult to implement. In addition to such legislative efforts, the EPA has determined that GHG emissions present a danger to public health and the environment and has adopted regulations that, among other things, establish construction and operating permit reviews for GHG emissions from certain large stationary sources, require the monitoring and annual reporting of GHG emissions from certain oil and natural gas system sources, implement CAA emission standards directing the reduction of methane emissions from certain new, modified, or reconstructed facilities in the oil and natural gas sector, and together with the U.S. Department of Transportation, implement GHG emissions limits on vehicles manufactured for operation in the United States. For example, generators are subject to limits on their emissions of other hazardous air pollutants including mercury under an expanded Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule adopted by the Biden Administration in 2024. In December 2023, the EPA issued a final rule updating New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and providing emission guidelines to reduce methane and other pollutants from the oil and gas industry. Additionally, the location and operation of oil and natural gas production is impacted by laws concerning impacts to protected species and their habitats. The federal Endangered Species Act, as amended (“ESA”), restricts activities in the United States that may affect endangered or threatened species and/or their habitats. If endangered species and/or their habitats are located in areas of the United States with oil and natural gas exploration and production operations, such operations can be prohibited or delayed or require potentially costly mitigation efforts. Additionally, in the absence of federal action and listing of endangered species and habitats, states and local governments may increasingly attempt to step in to subject such species and habitats to state protections under analogous state statut…

Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.

Current wording

The physical and regulatory effects of climate change could have a negative impact on our operations, our customers’ operations and the overall demand for our customers’ products and, accordingly, our services. In recent years, GHG emissions and climate change issues have been a focus of local, state, regional, national and international regulatory bodies and the subject of wide-ranging policy debate, both in the United States and internationally. Initiatives that would impact our industry and regulate GHG emissions have included cap-and-trade programs, carbon taxes, GHG reporting, tracking programs, attestation requirements and regulations that directly limit GHG emissions from certain sources. If new or more stringent standards are enacted that would require substantial reductions in carbon and/or GHG emissions, such reductions could be costly and difficult to implement in the oil and natural gas sector. Additionally, in the absence of federal actions targeting GHG emissions and associated impacts, states and local governments may increasingly attempt to step in to pass more stringent regulations that may impact our and our customers’ operating costs and demand for services. Further, international focus on and efforts aimed at reducing GHG emissions and to address climate change may impact our operations. Several states and geographic regions in the United States have also adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments to contribute to meeting certain emissions reduction goals.

Previous wording

In addition, environmental laws and regulations in the places that we operate impose a variety of requirements on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of spills and liability for damages from such spills. As an owner and operator of land-based drilling rigs and completion services equipment, a manufacturer and servicer of equipment and automation to the energy, marine and mining industries and a provider of directional drilling and other services, we may be deemed to be a responsible party under these laws and regulations. In the event hydrocarbons and other materials may have been disposed of, or released in or under properties currently or formerly owned or operated by us or our predecessors, which may have resulted, or may result, in soil and groundwater contamination in certain locations, any contamination found on, under or originating from the properties may be subject to remediation requirements under federal, state, foreign, regional and local laws, rules and regulations. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties over whom we have no control of their treatment of hydrocarbon and other materials or the manner in which they may have disposed of or released such materials. We could be required to remove or remediate wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators. In addition, it is possible we could be held responsible for oil and natural gas properties in which we own an interest but are not the operator.

Current wording

In addition, environmental laws and regulations in the places that we operate impose a variety of requirements on “responsible parties” related to the prevention of spills and liability for damages from any such spills. As an owner and operator of land-based drilling rigs and completion services equipment, a manufacturer and servicer of equipment and automation to the energy, marine and mining industries and a provider of directional drilling and other services, we may be deemed to be a responsible party under these laws and regulations. In the event hydrocarbons and other regulated materials may have been disposed of, or released in or under properties currently or formerly owned or operated by us or our predecessors, which may have resulted, or may result, in soil and groundwater contamination in certain locations, any contamination found on, under or originating from the properties may be subject to remediation requirements under federal, state, foreign, regional and local laws, rules and regulations. In addition, some of these properties have been operated by third parties over whom we have no control of their treatment of hydrocarbon and other regulated materials or the manner in which they may have disposed of or released such materials. We could be required to remove or remediate wastes disposed of or released by prior owners or operators. In addition, it is possible we could be held responsible for oil and natural gas properties in which we own an interest but are not the operator.

Previous wording

Certain subsidiaries we acquired in the Ulterra acquisition are defendants in a claim brought by a subsidiary of NOV Inc. alleging breach of a license agreement related to certain patents. Such subsidiaries have asserted defenses to the claim and are defending vigorously against this claim. An unfavorable judgment or resolution of this claim not covered by indemnity could have a material impact on our financial results.

Current wording

Certain subsidiaries we acquired in the Ulterra acquisition are defendants in a claim brought by a subsidiary of NOV Inc. alleging breach of a license agreement related to certain patents. Such subsidiaries have asserted defenses to the claim and are defending vigorously against this claim. Ulterra prevailed at the district court level, and NOV has filed a notice of appeal. An unfavorable judgment or resolution of this claim not covered by indemnity could have a material impact on our financial results. Please see Item 3 of this Report.

Previous wording

The nature of our business makes us susceptible to legal proceedings and governmental investigations from time to time. In addition, during periods of depressed market conditions, we may be subject to an increased risk of our customers, vendors, current and former employees and others initiating legal proceedings against us. Lawsuits or claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any legal proceedings or claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the public, and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. Please see “Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.”

Current wording

The nature of our business makes us susceptible to legal proceedings and governmental investigations from time to time. In addition, during periods of depressed market conditions, we may be subject to an increased risk of our customers, vendors, current and former employees and others initiating legal proceedings against us. Lawsuits or claims against us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any legal proceedings or claims, even if fully indemnified or insured, could negatively affect our reputation among our customers and the public and make it more difficult for us to compete effectively or obtain adequate insurance in the future. Please see “Our operations are subject to a number of operational risks, including environmental and weather risks, which could expose us to significant losses and damage claims. We are not fully insured against all of these risks and our contractual indemnity provisions may not fully protect us.” and “Intellectual property disputes could negatively impact our operations, costs, revenues and competitiveness.”

Previous wording

We provide specialized drill bit solutions throughout North America and internationally in over 30 countries, as well as contract drilling services in Colombia and Ecuador. We also sell products, including electrical controls, for use in numerous oil and natural gas producing regions outside of North America. In addition, through our Superior QC business, we occasionally provide remote data analytics and other services to customers to support their operations outside of the United States. One of our subsidiaries recently closed a joint venture in Abu Dhabi. We also continue to evaluate opportunities from time to time to provide our services and products outside of the United States. International operations and sales or rentals of products are subject to certain political, economic and other uncertainties generally not encountered in U.S. operations, including increased risks of social and political unrest, changing political conditions and changing laws and policies affecting trade and investment, strikes, work stoppages, labor disputes and other slowdowns, terrorism, war, kidnapping of employees, blockades, regional economic downturns, nationalization, forced negotiation or modification of contracts, difficulty resolving disputes and enforcing contractual rights, difficulty in collecting international accounts receivable, potentially longer payment cycles, expropriation of equipment as well as expropriation of oil and natural gas exploration and drilling rights, foreign taxation and customs regulations, the overlap of different tax structures, changes in taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions and restrictions on repatriation of income and capital, currency rate fluctuations, increased governmental ownership and regulation of the economy and industry in the markets in which we may operate, economic and financial instability of national oil companies, and restrictive governmental regulation, bureaucratic delays and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted.

Current wording

We provide specialized drill bit solutions throughout North America and internationally in over 30 countries, as well as contract drilling services in Colombia and Ecuador. We also sell products, including electrical controls, for use in numerous oil and natural gas producing regions outside of North America. In addition, through our Superior QC business, we occasionally provide remote data analytics and other services to customers to support their operations outside of the United States. One of our subsidiaries is party to a joint venture in Abu Dhabi. We also continue to evaluate opportunities from time to time to provide our services and products outside of the United States. International operations and sales or rentals of products are subject to certain political, economic and other uncertainties generally not encountered in U.S. operations, including increased risks of social and political unrest, changing political conditions and changing laws and policies affecting trade and investment, strikes, work stoppages, labor disputes and other slowdowns, terrorism, war, kidnapping of employees, blockades, regional economic downturns, nationalization, forced negotiation or modification of contracts, difficulty resolving disputes and enforcing contractual rights, difficulty in collecting international accounts receivable, potentially longer payment cycles, expropriation of equipment as well as expropriation of oil and natural gas exploration and drilling rights, foreign taxation and customs regulations, the overlap of different tax structures, changes in taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions and restrictions on repatriation of income and capital, currency rate fluctuations, increased governmental ownership and regulation of the economy and industry in the markets in which we may operate, economic and financial instability of national oil companies, and restrictive governmental regulation, bureaucratic delays and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted.

Previous wording

There are financial risks for oil and natural gas producers, as stockholders and bondholders currently invested in oil and natural gas companies and concerned about the potential effects of climate change, ESG and other sustainability-related issues may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors, or into competitors who are perceived to have stronger ESG practices and disclosures. At the same time, some stakeholders and regulators have increasingly expressed or pursued opposing views, legislation, and investment expectations with respect to ESG, including the enactment or proposal of “anti-ESG” legislation or policies. In addition, other parties such institutional lenders may consider sustainability factors in lending to us or our customers. Limitations of investments in and financing for oil and natural gas could result in the restriction, delay, or cancellation of drilling and completion programs or development of production activities. Our ESG practices and, through the publishing of our Sustainability Report from time to time, disclosures may be subject to increased scrutiny and may not satisfy the requirements of all stakeholders or their requirements may not be made known to us. We may continue to face pressure regarding our ESG practices and disclosures.

Current wording

There are financial risks for oil and natural gas producers, as stockholders and bondholders currently invested in oil and natural gas companies and concerned about the potential effects of climate change, ESG and other sustainability-related issues may elect in the future to shift some or all of their investments into non-fossil fuel energy related sectors, or into competitors who are perceived to have stronger ESG practices and disclosures. At the same time, some stakeholders and regulators have increasingly expressed or pursued opposing views, legislation and investment expectations with respect to ESG, including the enactment or proposal of “anti-ESG” legislation or policies. In addition, other parties such institutional lenders may consider sustainability factors in lending to us or our customers. Limitations of investments in and financing for oil and natural gas could result in the restriction, delay or cancellation of drilling and completion programs or development of production activities. Our ESG practices and, through the publishing of our

Previous wording

In January 2025, we put in place a committed senior unsecured revolving credit facility that amended the Prior Credit Agreement. Under the Credit Agreement, interest is paid on the outstanding principal amount of borrowings under the credit facility at a floating rate based on, at our election, the SOFR rate (plus a 0.10% per annum adjustment) or base rate, in each case subject to a 0.00% floor. Under the Credit Agreement, the applicable margin on SOFR rate loans varies from 1.25% to 2.25% and the applicable margin on base rate loans varies from 0.25% to 1.25%, in each case determined based on our credit rating. As of December 31, 2024, under the Prior Credit Agreement, the applicable margin on SOFR rate loans was 1.75% and the applicable margin on base rate loans was 0.75%. As of December 31, 2024, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Prior Credit Agreement.

Current wording

Our Credit Agreement includes a committed senior unsecured revolving credit facility. Under the Credit Agreement, interest is paid on the outstanding principal amount of borrowings under the credit facility at a floating rate based on, at our election, the SOFR rate (plus a 0.10% per annum adjustment) or base rate, in each case subject to a 0.00% floor. Under the Credit Agreement, the applicable margin on SOFR rate loans varies from 1.25% to 2.25% and the applicable margin on base rate loans varies from 0.25% to 1.25%, in each case determined based on our credit rating. As of December 31, 2025, we had no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Agreement.

Previous wording

We also have in place a reimbursement agreement pursuant to which we are required to reimburse the issuing bank on demand for any amounts that it has disbursed under any of our letters of credit issued thereunder. We are obligated to pay the issuing bank interest on all amounts not paid by us on the date of demand or when otherwise due at the Prime rate plus 2.00% per annum. As of December 31, 2024, no amounts had been disbursed under any letters of credit, and we had $38.8 million in letters of credit outstanding under the reimbursement agreement.

Current wording

We also have in place a reimbursement agreement pursuant to which we are required to reimburse the issuing bank on demand for any amounts that it has disbursed under any of our letters of credit issued thereunder. We are obligated to pay the issuing bank interest on all amounts not paid by us on the date of demand or when otherwise due at the Prime rate plus 2.00% per annum. As of December 31, 2025, no amounts had been disbursed under any letters of credit, and we had $32.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the reimbursement agreement.

Previous wording

Additionally, our ability to access capital markets or to otherwise obtain sufficient financing is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt ratings as provided by major U.S. credit rating agencies. Factors that may impact our credit ratings include debt levels, liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, commodity pricing levels, industry conditions and other considerations. A ratings downgrade could adversely impact our ability in the future to access debt markets, increase the cost of future debt, impact the terms of future amendments to our senior unsecured credit facility and potentially require us to post letters of credit for certain obligations.

Current wording

Additionally, our ability to access capital markets or to otherwise obtain sufficient financing is enhanced by our senior unsecured debt ratings as provided by major U.S. credit rating agencies. Factors that may impact our credit ratings include debt levels, liquidity, asset quality, cost structure, commodity pricing levels, industry conditions and other considerations. A ratings downgrade could adversely impact our ability in the future to access debt markets, increase the cost of future debt, impact the terms of future amendments to our senior unsecured credit facility, require us to comply with covenants in our debt agreements as a condition to making restricted payments, including payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, and potentially require us to post letters of credit for certain obligations.

Previous wording

Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to shareholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.

Current wording

Our return of capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, is within the discretion of our Board of Directors, and there is no guarantee that we will return capital to stockholders, including through the payment of dividends and repurchases of our common stock, in the future or at levels anticipated by our stockholders.

Previous wording

As of December 31, 2024, we had approximately $1.5 billion of gross U.S. federal net operating losses, approximately $58.7 million of gross Canadian net operating losses and approximately $910 million of post-apportionment U.S. state net operating losses as of December 31, 2024, before valuation allowances. The majority of the U.S. federal net operating losses are generated after 2017 and can be carried forward indefinitely. Canadian net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2036 and 2044. U.S. state net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2025 and 2044.

Current wording

As of December 31, 2025, we had approximately $1.4 billion of gross U.S. federal net operating losses, approximately $60.0 million of gross Canadian net operating losses and approximately $889 million of post-apportionment U.S. state net operating losses, before valuation allowances. The majority of the U.S. federal net operating losses were generated after 2017 and can be carried forward indefinitely. Canadian net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2036 and 2045. U.S. state net operating losses will expire in varying amounts, if unused, between 2028 and 2045.

Previous wording

Our bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware) is the exclusive forum for any claims, including claims in the right of Patterson-UTI: (a) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder in such capacity, or (b) as to which the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our bylaws further provide that the sole and exclusive forum for any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be the federal district courts of the United States. The enforceability of similar exclusive federal forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and while the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that this type of exclusive federal forum provision is facially valid under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts would enforce such provisions and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. These exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find either exclusive forum provision in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Our bylaws provide that, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have, or declines to accept, jurisdiction, another state court or a federal court located within the State of Delaware) is the exclusive forum for any claims, including claims in the right of Patterson-UTI: (a) that are based upon a violation of a duty by a current or former director, officer, employee or stockholder in such capacity, or (b) as to which the Delaware General Corporation Law confers jurisdiction upon the Court of Chancery. This provision would not apply to suits brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Exchange Act or any other claim for which the U.S. federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction. Our bylaws further provide that the sole and exclusive forum for any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be the federal district courts of the United States. The enforceability of similar exclusive federal forum provisions in other companies’ organizational documents has been challenged in legal proceedings, and while the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled that this type of exclusive federal forum provision is facially valid under Delaware law, there is uncertainty as to whether other courts would enforce such provisions and that investors cannot waive compliance with the federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder. These exclusive forum provisions may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and other employees. Alternatively, if a court were to find either exclusive forum provision in our bylaws to be inapplicable or unenforceable in an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving such action in other jurisdictions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

•changes to tariff and import/export regulations by the United States or other countries,

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

Sustainability Report from time to time, disclosures may be subject to increased scrutiny and may not satisfy the requirements of all stakeholders or their requirements may not be made known to us. We may continue to face pressure regarding our ESG practices and disclosures.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (1)

Previous report — wording carried elsewhere

In November 2021, the United States and other countries entered into the Glasgow Climate Pact, which includes a range of measures designed to address climate change, including but not limited to the phase-out of fossil fuel subsidies, reducing methane emissions 30% by 2030, and cooperating toward the advancement of the development of clean energy. Several states and geographic regions in the United States have also adopted legislation and regulations to reduce emissions of GHGs, including cap and trade regimes and commitments to contribute to meeting certain emissions reduction goals.