CONMED Corp

Note 14 -Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may receive an information request, subpoena or warrant from a government agency such as the Securities and Exchange Commission, Department of Justice, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the United States Food and Drug Administration, the Department of Labor, the Treasury Department or other federal and state agencies or foreign governments or government agencies. These information requests, subpoenas or warrants may or may not be routine inquiries, or may begin as routine inquiries and over time develop into enforcement actions of various types. Likewise, if we receive reports of alleged misconduct from employees or third parties, we investigate as appropriate.

Manufacturers of medical devices have been the subject of various investigations and enforcement actions relating to interactions with health care providers domestically or internationally whereby companies are claimed to have provided health care providers with inappropriate incentives to purchase their products. Similarly, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act ("FCPA") prohibits U.S. companies and their representatives from offering or making payments to foreign officials for the purpose of securing a business advantage; and in many countries, the healthcare professionals with whom we regularly interact may meet the definition of a foreign government official for purposes of this law. Similar anti-bribery laws are in effect in many of the countries in which we operate. The FCPA also imposes obligations on manufacturers listed on U.S. stock exchanges to maintain accurate books and records, and maintain internal accounting controls sufficient to provide assurance that transactions are accurately recorded, lawful and in accordance with management’s authorization. The FCPA can pose unique challenges for manufacturers that operate in foreign cultures where conduct prohibited by the FCPA may not be viewed as illegal in local jurisdictions, and because, in some cases, a United States manufacturer may face risks under the FCPA based on the conduct of third parties (e.g., distributors) over whom the manufacturer may not have complete control. While CONMED has not experienced any material enforcement action to date, there can be no assurance that the Company will not be subject to a material enforcement action in the future, or that the Company will not incur costs including, in the form of fees for lawyers and other consultants, that are material to the Company’s results of operations in the course of responding to a future inquiry or investigation.

In addition, as a manufacturer of U.S. FDA-approved devices reimbursable by federal healthcare programs, we are subject to the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires us to annually report certain payments and other transfers of value we make to U.S.-licensed physicians, U.S. teaching hospitals or other U.S. covered recipients. Any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could subject us or our officers and employees to criminal and civil financial penalties.

Manufacturers of medical devices may face exposure to significant product liability claims, as well as patent infringement and other claims incurred in the ordinary course of business. To date, we have not experienced any claims that have been material to our financial statements or financial condition, but any such claims arising in the future could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or cash flows. We currently maintain commercial product liability insurance of $35 million per incident and $35 million in the aggregate annually, which we believe is adequate. This coverage is on a claims-made basis. There can be no assurance that claims will not exceed insurance coverage, that the carriers will be solvent or that such insurance will be available to us in the future at a reasonable cost.

Our operations are subject, and in the past have been subject, to a number of environmental laws and regulations governing, among other things, air emissions; wastewater discharges; the use, handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes; soil and groundwater remediation and employee health and safety. Likewise, the operations of our suppliers and sterilizers are subject to similar environmental laws and regulations. In some jurisdictions, environmental requirements may be expected to become more stringent in the future. In the United States, certain environmental laws can impose liability for the entire cost of site restoration upon each of the parties that may have contributed to conditions at the site regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the party’s activities. While we do not believe that the present costs of environmental compliance and remediation are material, there can be no assurance that future compliance or remedial obligations would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

CONMED had been defending two Georgia State Court actions. The first action was filed in May 2020 in Cobb County by various current and former employees, contract workers and others against CONMED and a contract sterilizer (the “Cobb County Action”). Plaintiffs alleged personal injury and related claims purportedly arising from or relating to exposure to Ethylene Oxide, a chemical used to sterilize certain products. All claims against CONMED in the Cobb County Action have now been dismissed, however, CONMED is indemnifying its sterilization provider who remains in the case. The second action was filed in April 2021 in Douglas County against CONMED’s current and former landlord and property managers (the “Douglas County Action”). Plaintiffs alleged the same injuries as in the Cobb County Action. In July 2024, CONMED reached an agreement to settle this matter for an amount covered by CONMED’s insurance, and this litigation was dismissed in November 2024.

CONMED submitted the foregoing claims for insurance coverage by its insurance carrier Federal Insurance Company (“Chubb”). CONMED litigated two lawsuits against Chubb relative to its coverage of these claims: one involving CONMED’s claim for coverage for the indemnification claims arising from the Cobb County Action, and the other concerning CONMED’s claim for coverage for the indemnification claims arising from the Douglas County Action. With respect to the Cobb County Action, the Court has ruled in favor of CONMED with respect to coverage for the indemnification of CONMED’s sterilization provider. With respect to the Douglas County Action, the parties entered a settlement agreement in which Chubb agreed to pay CONMED’s defense fees. As a result of a dispute with respect to the amount of CONMED’s defense fees, CONMED commenced a third action against Chubb to enforce the terms of the settlement agreement.

The government of Italy passed a law in late 2015 to tax medical device companies on revenue derived from sales to public hospitals. The tax is calculated and based on provincial spending over and above certain thresholds. The Italy medical device tax represents variable consideration in the form of a retroactive discount potentially owed to the customer, which is ultimately the Italian government. Since the law was enacted through September 2022, the Italian government essentially made no effort to administer or collect the tax. A lack of interpretative guidance and the complexity of the law resulted in uncertainty as to the actual amount of liability. In September 2022, the Italian government passed a further decree which, amongst other provisions, delegated administration and collection to the provincial level for the years 2015 – 2018. The Company challenged the imposition of the medical device tax in Italy, as did many other medical device companies, on the grounds that the law was never implemented properly with regulations. On July 22, 2024, the Italian Constitutional Court determined the tax to be constitutional, however, a 52% discount on amounts due for the years 2015-2018 was granted as part of the ruling. The Company has used its best estimate to record reserves related to the tax. No amounts have been remitted to date.

In December 2023, the Company voluntarily informed the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) of potential issues with certain royalty payments related to surgeons involved in design teams. The Company is fully cooperating with the DOJ and their review of the matter.

From time to time, we are also subject to negligence and other claims arising out of the ordinary conduct of our business, including, for example, automobile or other accidents our employees may experience within the course of their employment or otherwise and which may, on occasion, involve potentially significant personal injuries or other exposures.

We record reserves sufficient to cover probable and estimable losses associated with pending claims. With respect to the matters described above, except as noted related to the medical device tax in Italy, the Company is unable to estimate a range of possible loss at this time, nor does it believe any potential loss is probable, and as a result has not recorded any reserves related to the potential outcomes in connection with these matters. We do not expect that the resolution of any pending claims, investigations or reports of alleged misconduct will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. There can be no assurance, however, that future claims, investigations or reports of alleged misconduct, or the costs associated with responding to such claims, investigations or reports of alleged misconduct, especially when not covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Note 15 -Guarantees

We provide warranties on certain of our products at the time of sale and sell extended warranties. The standard warranty period for our capital equipment is generallyone year and our extended warranties typically vary from one to three years. Liability under service and warranty policies is based upon a review of historical warranty and service claim experience. Adjustments are made to accruals as claim data and historical experience warrant.

Changes in the carrying amount of standard warranties for the years ended December 31, are as follows:

Costs associated with extended warranty repairs are recorded as incurred and amounted to $4.9 million, $4.8 million and $5.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023 and 2022 respectively.

Note 16 -Fair Value Measurement

We enter into derivative instruments for risk management purposes only. We operate internationally and, in the normal course of business, are exposed to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and commodity prices. These fluctuations can increase the costs of financing, investing and operating the business. We use forward contracts, a type of derivative instrument, to manage certain foreign currency exposures.

By nature, all financial instruments involve market and credit risks. We enter into forward contracts with major investment grade financial institutions and have policies to monitor the credit risk of those counterparties. While there can be no assurance, we do not anticipate any material non-performance by any of these counterparties.

Foreign Currency Forward Contracts. We hedge forecasted intercompany sales denominated in foreign currencies through the use of forward contracts. We account for these forward contracts as cash flow hedges. To the extent these forward contracts meet hedge accounting criteria, changes in their fair value are not included in current earnings but are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss. These changes in fair value will be recognized into earnings as a component of sales or cost of sales when the forecasted transaction occurs.

We also enter into forward contracts to exchange foreign currencies for United States dollars in order to hedge our currency transaction exposures. These forward contracts settle each month at month-end, at which time we enter into new forward contracts. We have not designated these forward contracts as hedges and have not applied hedge accounting to them.

The following table presents the notional contract amounts for forward contracts outstanding:

The remaining time to maturity as of December 31, 2024 is withintwo years for hedge designated foreign exchange contracts and approximatelyone month for non-hedge designated forward exchange contracts.

Statement of comprehensive income (loss) presentation

Derivatives designated as cash flow hedges

Foreign exchange contracts designated as cash flow hedges had the following effects on accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI") and net earnings on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) and our consolidated balance sheets:

At December 31, 2024, $4.1 million of net unrealized gains on forward contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges, and included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, are expected to be recognized in earnings in the next twelve months.

Derivatives not designated as cash flow hedges

Net gain (loss) from derivative instruments not accounted for as hedges and loss on our intercompany receivables on our consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss) were:

Balance sheet presentation

We record these forward foreign exchange contracts at fair value. The following tables summarize the fair value for forward foreign exchange contracts outstanding at December 31, 2024 and 2023:

Our forward foreign exchange contracts are subject to a master netting agreement and qualify for netting in the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value Disclosure. FASB guidance defines fair value and establishes a framework for measuring fair value and related disclosure requirements. This guidance applies when fair value measurements are required or permitted. The guidance indicates, among other things, that a fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell an asset or transfer a liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. Fair value is defined based upon an exit price model.

Valuation Hierarchy. A valuation hierarchy was established for disclosure of the inputs to the valuations used to measure fair value. This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, including interest rates, yield curves and credit risks, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. There have been no significant changes in the assumptions.

Valuation Techniques. Assets and liabilities carried at fair value and measured on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2024 consist of forward foreign exchange contracts and contingent consideration. The Company values its forward foreign exchange contracts using quoted prices for similar assets. The most significant assumption is quoted currency rates. The value of the forward foreign exchange contract assets and liabilities were valued using Level 2 inputs and are listed in the table above.

The Company values contingent consideration from the In2Bones and Biorez acquisitions using Level 3 inputs. The contingent consideration was recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition based on the consideration expected to be transferred, estimated as the probability-weighted future cash flows, discounted back to present value. The fair value of contingent consideration is measured using projected payment dates, discount rates, revenue volatilities, and projected revenues. The recurring Level 3 fair value measurements of contingent consideration for which the liabilities are recorded include the following significant unobservable inputs as of December 31, 2024:

Adjustments to the fair value of contingent consideration during 2024 for In2Bones were driven principally by the level of In2Bones revenue and reflect various factors, including a delayed recovery from supply chain constraints, delays in product registrations and integration disruptions. Biorez adjustments to fair value of contingent consideration during 2024 principally relate to the level of Biorez revenue driven by the expected timing of clinical trial results. Changes in the fair value of contingent consideration liabilities for years ended December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 are as follows:

Contingent consideration of $35.4 million and $36.8 million is included in other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2024. Contingent consideration of $77.6 million and $92.5 million is included in other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2023.

The carrying amounts reported in our balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and variable long-term debt approximate fair value.

SCHEDULE II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts