Skip to main content

WERNER ENTERPRISES INC

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 26, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 26, 2026

WERN$26.95-3.6%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-26.

0000793074-25-000009

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-26.

0000793074-26-000071

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 43 previous paragraphs and 43 current paragraphs.

38 unchanged; 5 reworded; 0 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 1 previous and 1 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Reworded paragraphs (5)

Previous wording

We are sensitive to economic or geopolitical conditions, in particular, those that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand, and industry truck capacity. Such conditions can include, among others, employment levels, business conditions, fuel and energy costs, public health crises, interest rates, tax rates, political conflict, and global trade policy. Tariffs or trade regulations may impact the cost or availability of materials, equipment, goods, and fuel. Impacts from any of the foregoing on (i) our suppliers could affect pricing or availability of needed goods and services and (ii) our customers could weaken their financial condition, increase our risk of bad debt losses, and decrease demand for our services (even if preceded by increased demand in anticipation of a trade regulation or other change). When conditions cause a decline in shipping volumes or an increase in available truck capacity, freight pricing generally becomes more competitive as carriers compete for loads to maintain truck productivity. Any of the foregoing may impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Current wording

We are sensitive to economic or geopolitical conditions, in particular, those that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand, and industry truck capacity. Such conditions can include, among others, employment levels, business conditions, fuel and energy costs, public health crises, interest rates, tax rates, political conflict, and global trade policy. Tariffs or trade regulations may impact the cost or availability of materials, equipment, goods, and fuel. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. government cannot use the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs, overturning certain recent tariffs announced throughout 2025, including those on global imports from China, Canada and Mexico. This decision creates uncertainty about the immediate path forward for many supply chains. Not all tariffs announced throughout 2025 will be impacted by this U.S. Supreme Court decision since many tariffs were imposed under other legal authorities that remain in effect and new tariffs may continue to be implemented through these other legal authorities. Impacts from any of the foregoing on (i) our suppliers could affect pricing or availability of needed goods and services and (ii) our customers could weaken their financial condition, increase our risk of bad debt losses, and decrease demand for our services (even if preceded by increased demand in anticipation of a trade regulation or other change). When conditions cause a decline in shipping volumes or an increase in available truck capacity, freight pricing generally becomes more competitive as carriers compete for loads to maintain truck productivity. Any of the foregoing may impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Previous wording

A significant portion of our revenue is generated from key customers. During 2024, our largest 5, 10, 25 and 50 customers accounted for 36%, 48%, 65%, and 77% of revenues, respectively. Our largest customer, Dollar General, accounted for 11% of our total revenues in 2024. We do not have long-term contractual relationships with many of our key One-Way Truckload customers. Most of our Dedicated customer contracts are two to five years in length and generally may be terminated by either party typically upon a notice period following the expiration of the contract’s first year. We typically renegotiate rates with our customers for these Dedicated contracts annually. We cannot provide any assurance that key customer relationships will continue at the same levels. If a key customer substantially reduced or terminated our services, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We review our customers’ financial conditions for granting credit, monitor changes in customers’ financial conditions on an ongoing basis and review individual past-due balances and collection concerns. However, a key customer’s financial failure may negatively affect our results of operations.

Current wording

A significant portion of our revenue is generated from key customers. During 2025, our largest 5, 10, 25 and 50 customers accounted for 38%, 50%, 66%, and 78% of revenues, respectively. Our largest customer, Dollar General, accounted for 11% of our total revenues in 2025. We do not have long-term contractual relationships with many of our key One-Way Truckload customers. Most of our Dedicated customer contracts are two to five years in length and generally may be terminated by either party typically upon a notice period following the expiration of the contract’s first year. We typically renegotiate rates with our customers for these Dedicated contracts annually. We cannot provide any assurance that key customer relationships will continue at the same levels. If a key customer substantially reduced or terminated our services, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We review our customers’ financial conditions for granting credit, monitor changes in customers’ financial conditions on an ongoing basis and review individual past-due balances and collection concerns. However, a key customer’s financial failure may negatively affect our results of operations.

Previous wording

Our mitigation of these risks includes, without limitation, using certain redundant computer hardware, tools and protocols to monitor and respond to threats, the work of a dedicated internal cybersecurity team, incident and crisis response plans, enterprise-wide information security policies and trainings, and the use of artificial intelligence. However, the security risks associated with information technology systems have increased in recent years because of the evolving sophistication, activities and methods of cyber attackers, including the use of artificial intelligence. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, may be difficult to detect, and often are not recognized until launched against a target, and we may be unable or fail to anticipate them or to implement adequate preventative measures. We may incur costs in responding to a specific event. Fortifying our systems after a cybersecurity event may be cost prohibitive. Our investments in cybersecurity may not be successful against an attack or malicious action.

Current wording

Our mitigation of these risks includes, without limitation, using certain redundant computer hardware, tools and protocols to monitor and respond to threats, the work of a dedicated internal cybersecurity team, incident and crisis response plans, enterprise-wide information security policies and trainings, and the use of artificial intelligence. However, the security risks associated with information technology systems have increased in recent years because of the evolving sophistication, activities and methods of cyber attackers, including the use of artificial intelligence. As we implement artificial intelligence solutions, we limit liability by ensuring that vendors’ indemnity obligations extend to artificial intelligence solutions and require such vendors to undertake commercially reasonable measures to prevent hallucinations and bias. In addition, we take a proactive approach to understand how our data will be used by the artificial intelligence solution to prevent and mitigate competitive concerns. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, may be difficult to detect, and often are not recognized until launched against a target, and we may be unable or fail to anticipate them or to implement adequate preventative measures. We may incur costs in responding to a specific event. Fortifying our systems after a cybersecurity event may be cost prohibitive. Our investments in cybersecurity may not be successful against an attack or malicious action.

Previous wording

Increasing scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders regarding ESG related matters may have a negative impact on our business.

Current wording

Scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders regarding ESG related matters may have a negative impact on our business.

Previous wording

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to ESG matters, including practices and disclosures related to sustainability. Organizations that provide information to stakeholders (including customers and investors) on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some customers to evaluate their relationship with us and by some investors to inform their investment and proxy statement voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative sentiment toward us by stakeholders, which could have a negative impact on our revenues, stock price and access to and costs of capital. While we believe our sustainability programs are balanced in the context of our business and stakeholder demands, we could draw criticism related to all or a portion of our sustainability initiatives.

Current wording

Companies across all industries face scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to ESG matters, including practices and disclosures related to sustainability. Organizations that provide information to stakeholders (including customers and investors) on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some customers to evaluate their relationship with us and by some investors to inform their investment and proxy statement voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative sentiment toward us by stakeholders, which could have a negative impact on our revenues, stock price and access to and costs of capital. While we believe our sustainability programs are balanced in the context of our business and stakeholder demands, we could draw criticism related to all or a portion of our sustainability initiatives.