WERNER ENTERPRISES INC
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Feb 26, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2024 · Filed Feb 26, 2025
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2023-12-31; filed 2024-02-26.
0000793074-24-000014
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-26.
0000793074-25-000009
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 43 previous paragraphs and 43 current paragraphs.
28 unchanged; 14 reworded; 1 added; 1 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 1 previous and 1 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (1)
Current report
The impact on independent contractors of inflationary cost increases and the market for and cost of financing equipment may affect their availability to us. In recent years, the classification of individuals as employees or independent contractors has gained increased attention among tax and other regulators, as well as plaintiffs’ attorneys who have pursued lawsuits against transportation companies alleging misclassification of employees and independent contractors resulting in significant damages. Changes that impact the classification of the relationship between us and our independent contractors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to recruit and retain them, which could negatively impact our operations. If pay rates for drivers or per-mile settlement rates for independent contractors increased, our results of operations would be negatively impacted to the extent that we could not obtain corresponding freight rate increases.
Removed paragraphs (1)
Previous report
Independent contractor availability may also be affected by both inflationary cost increases that are the responsibility of independent contractors and the availability and cost of equipment financing. Ongoing federal and state legislative challenges to the independent contractor model could also affect independent contractor availability. In recent years, the topic of the classification of individuals as employees or independent contractors has gained increased attention among federal and state regulators as well as the plaintiffs’ bar. Various legislative or regulatory proposals have been introduced at the federal and state levels that may affect the classification status of individuals as independent contractors or employees for either employment tax purposes (e.g., withholding, social security, Medicare and unemployment taxes) or other benefits available to employees (e.g., workers’ compensation benefits and minimum wage). Recently, certain states have seen significant increased activity by tax and other regulators regarding worker classification, and class action lawsuits alleging misclassification by transportation companies have resulted in significant damage awards or monetary settlements. Potential changes, if any, that could impact the legal classification of the independent contractor relationship between us and our independent contractors could have a material adverse effect on our ability to recruit and retain independent contractors. If a shortage of independent contractors occurs, increases in per-mile settlement rates (for independent contractors) and driver pay rates (for company drivers) may become necessary to attract and retain a sufficient number of drivers. These increases would negatively affect our results of operations to the extent that we would be unable to obtain corresponding freight rate increases.
Reworded paragraphs (14)
Previous wording
We are sensitive to changes in economic or geopolitical conditions that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand, and industry truck capacity. When shipping volumes decline or available truck capacity increases, freight pricing generally becomes more competitive as carriers compete for loads to maintain truck productivity. We may be negatively affected by future economic conditions including employment levels, business conditions, fuel and energy costs, public health crises, interest rates and tax rates. Economic or geopolitical conditions may also impact the financial condition of our customers, resulting in a decreased demand for services or a greater risk of bad debt losses, and that of our suppliers, which may affect negotiated pricing or availability of needed goods and services.
Current wording
We are sensitive to economic or geopolitical conditions, in particular, those that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand, and industry truck capacity. Such conditions can include, among others, employment levels, business conditions, fuel and energy costs, public health crises, interest rates, tax rates, political conflict, and global trade policy. Tariffs or trade regulations may impact the cost or availability of materials, equipment, goods, and fuel. Impacts from any of the foregoing on (i) our suppliers could affect pricing or availability of needed goods and services and (ii) our customers could weaken their financial condition, increase our risk of bad debt losses, and decrease demand for our services (even if preceded by increased demand in anticipation of a trade regulation or other change). When conditions cause a decline in shipping volumes or an increase in available truck capacity, freight pricing generally becomes more competitive as carriers compete for loads to maintain truck productivity. Any of the foregoing may impact our results of operations and financial condition.
Previous wording
At times, the trucking industry has experienced driver shortages. Driver availability may be affected by changing workforce demographics, alternative employment opportunities, national unemployment rates, freight market conditions, availability of financial aid for driver training schools and changing industry regulations. If such a shortage were to occur and driver pay rate increases became necessary to attract and retain drivers, our results of operations would be negatively impacted to the extent that we could not obtain corresponding freight rate increases. Additionally, a shortage of drivers could result in idled equipment, which would affect our profitability and would limit growth opportunities.
Current wording
At times, the trucking industry has experienced driver shortages. Driver turnover, recruiting and availability may be affected by changes in our customer base, fleet size, and workforce demographics; alternative employment opportunities and national unemployment rates; freight market conditions; availability of financial aid for driver training schools; and changing industry regulations. If such a shortage were to occur and driver pay rate increases became necessary to attract and retain drivers, our results of operations would be negatively impacted to the extent that we could not obtain corresponding freight rate increases. Additionally, a shortage of drivers could result in idled equipment, which would affect our profitability and limit growth opportunities.
Previous wording
During 2023, union organizing efforts occurred at two locations of a U.S. subsidiary, which resulted in fewer than 30 of our employees being represented by a union. Additional unionization, if broad-based, could have a material adverse effect on our costs, efficiency, and profitability. Driver or other employee dissatisfaction and regulations that govern organization procedures could impact our ability to effectively or timely address any organization efforts.
Current wording
During 2023, union organizing efforts occurred at two locations of a U.S. subsidiary, which resulted in fewer than 30 of our employees being represented by a union. In September 2024, that small group of drivers filed a petition seeking to decertify the union and end their union’s representation. The union responded by voluntarily ending its representation of those drivers and, as a result, those drivers are no longer unionized. Unionization, if broad-based, could have a material adverse effect on our costs, efficiency, and profitability.
Previous wording
A significant portion of our revenue is generated from key customers. During 2023, our largest 5, 10, 25 and 50 customers accounted for 35%, 48%, 65%, and 78% of revenues, respectively. Our largest customer, Dollar General, accounted for 10% of our total revenues in 2023. We do not have long-term contractual relationships with many of our key One-Way Truckload customers. Most of our Dedicated customer contracts are two to five years in length and generally may be terminated by either party typically upon a notice period following the expiration of the contract’s first year. We typically renegotiate rates with our customers for these Dedicated contracts annually. We cannot provide any assurance that key customer relationships will continue at the same levels. If a key customer substantially reduced or terminated our services, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We review our customers’ financial conditions for granting credit, monitor changes in customers’ financial conditions on an ongoing basis and review individual past-due balances and collection concerns. However, a key customer’s financial failure may negatively affect our results of operations.
Current wording
A significant portion of our revenue is generated from key customers. During 2024, our largest 5, 10, 25 and 50 customers accounted for 36%, 48%, 65%, and 77% of revenues, respectively. Our largest customer, Dollar General, accounted for 11% of our total revenues in 2024. We do not have long-term contractual relationships with many of our key One-Way Truckload customers. Most of our Dedicated customer contracts are two to five years in length and generally may be terminated by either party typically upon a notice period following the expiration of the contract’s first year. We typically renegotiate rates with our customers for these Dedicated contracts annually. We cannot provide any assurance that key customer relationships will continue at the same levels. If a key customer substantially reduced or terminated our services, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. We review our customers’ financial conditions for granting credit, monitor changes in customers’ financial conditions on an ongoing basis and review individual past-due balances and collection concerns. However, a key customer’s financial failure may negatively affect our results of operations.
Previous wording
Our results are affected by the success of our operations in Mexico and other foreign countries in which we operate (see Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K). We are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign currencies, changes in the economic strength of the countries in which we do business, difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations and intellectual property rights, burdens of complying with a wide variety of international and United States export and import laws, and social, political, and economic instability. Additional risks associated with our foreign operations, including restrictive trade policies and imposition of duties, taxes, or government royalties by foreign governments, are present but have been largely mitigated by the terms of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) for Mexico and Canada. The United States, Canada and Mexico ratified the USMCA as an overhaul and update to the North America Free Trade Agreement, and it became effective in July 2020. We believe Werner is one of the largest U.S. based truckload carriers in terms of freight volume shipped to and from the United States and Mexico. There are risks, sometimes unforeseen, associated with international operations. The agreement permitting cross border movements for both United States and Mexican based carriers into the United States and Mexico presents additional risks in the form of potential increased competition and the potential for increased congestion on the cross-border lanes between countries. At the present time, immigration at the southern border has not negatively affected our operations; however, if the situation intensifies, operations could be affected.
Current wording
Our results are affected by the success of our operations in Mexico and other foreign countries in which we operate (see Note 13 in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K). We are subject to risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign currencies, changes in the economic strength of the countries in which we do business, difficulties in enforcing contractual obligations and intellectual property rights, burdens of complying with a wide variety of international and United States export and import laws, changing tariff policies on imported goods, and social, political, and economic instability. Additional risks associated with our foreign operations, including restrictive trade policies and imposition of duties, taxes, or government royalties by foreign governments, are present but have been largely mitigated by the terms of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (“USMCA”) for Mexico and Canada. The United States, Canada and Mexico ratified the USMCA as an overhaul and update to the North America Free Trade Agreement, and it became effective in July 2020. We believe Werner is one of the largest U.S. based truckload carriers in terms of freight volume shipped to and from the United States and Mexico. There are risks, sometimes unforeseen, associated with international operations. The agreement permitting cross border movements for both United States and Mexican based carriers into the United States and Mexico presents additional risks in the form of potential increased competition and the potential for increased congestion on the cross-border lanes between countries. At the present time, immigration at the southern border has not negatively affected our operations; however, if the situation intensifies, operations could be affected.
Previous wording
We rely increasingly on cloud-based technology and depend on the stability, availability and security of our information systems to manage our business. Much of our software was developed internally or by adapting purchased software applications to suit our needs. Our information systems are used for various purposes including, without limitation, enhancing customer service, planning freight loads, communicating with and dispatching drivers and other capacity providers, billing and collecting from customers, paying vendors and associates, maintaining sensitive or confidential Company or third-party information or employee personal information, and generating financial, operational, and other information. We rely on strategic vendors for certain services that impact our systems and communications, such as, for example, integrated GPS and satellite communication services and Internet and telecommunications services. System disruption or unavailability could occur due to various events, including, without limitation, a power outage, a hardware or software failure, a cybersecurity threat or breach, a catastrophic occurrence, or the disruption of a vendor’s service to us. If any of our information systems, or those of our providers, become compromised or unavailable, or are taken offline in response to a threat or other event, certain critical functions may be disrupted, subject to manual performance, or fail.
Current wording
We rely increasingly on cloud-based technology and depend on the stability, availability and security of our information systems to manage our business. Some of our software was developed internally or by adapting purchased software applications to suit our needs. Our information systems are used for various purposes including, without limitation, enhancing customer service, planning freight loads, communicating with and dispatching drivers and other capacity providers, billing and collecting from customers, paying vendors and associates, maintaining sensitive or confidential Company or third-party information or employee personal information, and generating financial, operational, and other information. We rely on strategic vendors for certain services that impact our systems and communications, such as integrated GPS and satellite communication services and Internet and telecommunications services. System disruption or unavailability could occur due to various events, including, without limitation, a power outage, a hardware or software failure, a cybersecurity threat or breach, a catastrophic occurrence, or the disruption of a vendor’s service to us. If any of our information systems, or those of our providers, become compromised or unavailable, or are taken offline in response to a threat or other event, certain critical functions may be disrupted, subject to manual performance, or fail.
Previous wording
Our mitigation of these risks includes, without limitation, using certain redundant computer hardware, tools and protocols to monitor and respond to threats, the work of a dedicated internal cybersecurity team, incident and crisis response plans, and enterprise-wide information security policies and trainings. However, the security risks associated with information technology systems have increased in recent years because of the evolving sophistication, activities and methods of cyber attackers. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, may be difficult to detect, and often are not recognized until launched against a target, and we may be unable or fail to anticipate them or to implement adequate preventative measures. We may incur costs in responding to a specific event. Fortifying our systems after a cybersecurity event may be cost prohibitive. Our investments in cybersecurity may not be successful against an attack or malicious action.
Current wording
Our mitigation of these risks includes, without limitation, using certain redundant computer hardware, tools and protocols to monitor and respond to threats, the work of a dedicated internal cybersecurity team, incident and crisis response plans, enterprise-wide information security policies and trainings, and the use of artificial intelligence. However, the security risks associated with information technology systems have increased in recent years because of the evolving sophistication, activities and methods of cyber attackers, including the use of artificial intelligence. The techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service or sabotage systems change frequently, may be difficult to detect, and often are not recognized until launched against a target, and we may be unable or fail to anticipate them or to implement adequate preventative measures. We may incur costs in responding to a specific event. Fortifying our systems after a cybersecurity event may be cost prohibitive. Our investments in cybersecurity may not be successful against an attack or malicious action.
Previous wording
A public health crisis, such as an epidemic, pandemic, or similar outbreak, has had, and may continue to have an adverse impact on our business, as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers.
Current wording
A public health crisis, such as an epidemic, pandemic, or similar outbreak may have an adverse impact on our business, as well as the operations of our customers and suppliers.
Previous wording
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a slowdown of economic activity and a disruption in supply chains during 2020 and 2021. Our business is sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand and industry truck capacity. Such conditions may also impact the financial condition of our customers, resulting in a greater risk of bad debt losses, and that of our suppliers, which may affect the availability or pricing of needed goods and services. Although we took numerous actions to lessen the adverse impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, our future results could be further impacted by the disruptive effects of a future pandemic or outbreak, including but not limited to adverse effects on freight volumes and pricing and availability of qualified personnel. Such outbreaks could affect our operations and business continuity if a significant number of our essential employees, overall or in a key location, are quarantined from contraction of or exposure to the disease or if future governmental orders prevent our employees or critical suppliers (including individuals that have not received mandated vaccinations) from working. Our compliance with mandates could lead to employee absences, resignations, labor disputes, or work stoppages. The degree of disruption is difficult to predict because of many factors, including the uncertainty surrounding the magnitude and duration of an outbreak, governmental actions that may be imposed, as well as the rate of economic recovery after an outbreak subsides. The unpredictable nature and uncertainty of a public health crisis could also magnify other risk factors disclosed above and makes it impractical to identify all potential risks.
Current wording
An epidemic, pandemic or similar outbreak could result in a slowdown of economic activity and a disruption in supply chains. Our business is sensitive to changes in overall economic conditions that impact customer shipping volumes, industry freight demand and industry truck capacity. Such conditions may also impact the financial condition of our customers, resulting in a greater risk of bad debt losses, and that of our suppliers, which may affect the availability or pricing of needed goods and services. Our future results could be impacted by the disruptive effects of an epidemic, pandemic or similar outbreak, including but not limited to adverse effects on freight volumes and pricing and availability of qualified personnel. Such outbreaks could affect our operations and business continuity if a significant number of our essential employees, overall or in a key location, are quarantined from contraction of or exposure to the disease or if future governmental orders prevent our employees or critical suppliers (including individuals that have not received mandated vaccinations) from working. Our compliance with mandates could lead to employee absences, resignations, labor disputes, or work stoppages. The degree of disruption is difficult to predict because of many factors, including the uncertainty surrounding the magnitude and duration of an outbreak, governmental actions that may be imposed, as well as the rate of economic recovery after an outbreak subsides. The unpredictable nature and uncertainty of a public health crisis could also magnify other risk factors disclosed above and makes it impractical to identify all potential risks.
Previous wording
We are regulated by DOT and its agency, FMCSA, in the United States and similar governmental transportation agencies in certain U.S. states and in foreign countries in which we operate. These regulatory agencies have the authority to govern transportation-related activities, such as safety, authorization to conduct motor carrier operations and other matters. The EPA and CARB subject us to emissions and fuel efficiency regulations, and additional regulations by these and other agencies may occur. The Regulations subsection in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K describes several proposed and final regulations that may have a significant effect on our operations including our productivity, driver recruitment and retention, and capital expenditures for tractors, trailers, and other equipment necessary to comply with such regulations.
Current wording
We are regulated by DOT and its agency, FMCSA, in the United States and similar governmental transportation agencies in certain U.S. states and in foreign countries in which we operate. These regulatory agencies have the authority to govern transportation-related activities, such as safety, authorization to conduct motor carrier operations and other matters. EPA and CARB subject us to emissions and fuel efficiency regulations, and additional regulations by these and other agencies may occur. The Regulations subsection in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-K describes several proposed and final regulations that may have a significant effect on our operations including our productivity, driver recruitment and retention, and capital expenditures for tractors, trailers, and other equipment necessary to comply with such regulations.
Previous wording
If we fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could be subject to substantial fines or penalties and to civil and criminal liability.
Current wording
If we fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could be subject to substantial fines or penalties and civil and criminal liability.
Previous wording
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to ESG matters, including practices and disclosures related to environmental stewardship, social responsibility, and diversity, equity and inclusion. Organizations that provide information to investors and other stakeholders on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some investors to inform their investment and proxy statement voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative sentiment toward us by investors or other stakeholders, which could have a negative impact on our revenues, stock price and access to and costs of capital.
Current wording
Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from investors and other stakeholders related to ESG matters, including practices and disclosures related to sustainability. Organizations that provide information to stakeholders (including customers and investors) on corporate governance and related matters have developed ratings processes for evaluating companies on their approach to ESG matters. Such ratings are used by some customers to evaluate their relationship with us and by some investors to inform their investment and proxy statement voting decisions. Unfavorable ESG ratings may lead to negative sentiment toward us by stakeholders, which could have a negative impact on our revenues, stock price and access to and costs of capital. While we believe our sustainability programs are balanced in the context of our business and stakeholder demands, we could draw criticism related to all or a portion of our sustainability initiatives.
Previous wording
We have developed certain initiatives and goals relating to ESG matters. Our ability to successfully execute these initiatives and accurately report our progress presents numerous operational, financial, legal, reputational and other risks, many of which are outside our control, and all of which could have a material negative impact on our business. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives imposes additional costs on us. If our ESG initiatives and goals do not meet the expectations of our investors or other stakeholders, which continue to evolve, then our reputation, our ability to attract or retain employees, and our attractiveness as an investment or business partner could be negatively impacted. Similarly, our failure, or perceived failure, to pursue or fulfill our goals, targets and objectives or to satisfy various reporting standards in a timely manner, or at all, could also have similar negative impacts and expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation.
Current wording
Our ability to adequately communicate, through corporate sustainability reports and otherwise, the business reasons and stakeholder priorities that influence our sustainability programs, to successfully execute these initiatives and to accurately report our progress presents numerous operational, financial, legal, reputational and other risks, many of which are outside our control, and all of which could have a material negative impact on our business. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives imposes additional costs on us. If our ESG initiatives and goals do not meet the expectations of our customers, investors or other stakeholders, which continue to evolve and may be conflicting, then our reputation, our ability to attract or retain employees, and our attractiveness as an investment or business partner could be negatively impacted. Similarly, our failure, or perceived failure, to pursue or fulfill our goals, targets and objectives or to satisfy various reporting standards in a timely manner, or at all, could also have similar negative impacts and expose us to government enforcement actions and private litigation.
Previous wording
We are subject to claims and litigation risks regarding a variety of issues, including without limitation, over-the-road accidents and contractual, labor and employment, environmental, regulatory, workers’ compensation, and data privacy matters. We are self-insured for a significant portion of liability resulting from bodily injury, property damage, cargo and associate workers’ compensation and health benefit claims. This is supplemented by premium-based insurance coverage with insurance carriers above our self-insurance level for each such type of coverage. To the extent we experience a significant increase in the number of claims, cost per claim (including costs resulting from large verdicts) or insurance premium costs for coverage in excess of our retention and deductible amounts, or if we incur a significant liability for which we do not have coverage, our operating results would be negatively affected. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. In addition, the transportation industry has recently experienced significant increases in premiums for insurance coverage above self-insurance levels. Healthcare legislation and inflationary cost increases could also have a negative effect on our results.
Current wording
As a large transportation and logistics company, we are subject to claims and litigation risks regarding a variety of issues, including, without limitation, over-the-road accidents and contractual, labor and employment, environmental, regulatory, workers’ compensation, and data privacy matters. We are self-insured for a significant portion of liability resulting from bodily injury, property damage, cargo and associate workers’ compensation and health benefit claims. This is supplemented by premium-based insurance coverage with insurance carriers above our self-insurance level for each such type of coverage. To the extent we experience a significant increase in the number of claims, cost per claim (including costs resulting from large verdicts) or insurance premium costs for coverage in excess of our retention and deductible amounts, or if we incur a significant liability for which we do not have coverage, our operating results would be negatively affected. Although we believe our aggregate insurance limits should be sufficient to cover reasonably expected claims, it is possible that the amount of one or more claims could exceed our aggregate coverage limits. In addition, the transportation industry has recently experienced significant increases in premiums for insurance coverage above self-insurance levels. Healthcare legislation and inflationary cost increases could also have a negative effect on our results.