ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO
For the period ended Mar 31, 2026. Filed May 4, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2026 · Filed May 4, 2026
What changed in Management’s Discussion and Analysis?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-Q
Period ended 2025-09-30; filed 2025-11-03.
0000764622-25-000087
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsCurrent report: 10-Q
Period ended 2026-03-31; filed 2026-05-04.
0000764622-26-000025
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 202 previous paragraphs and 192 current paragraphs.
90 unchanged; 79 reworded; 21 added; 21 removed; 12 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 13 previous and 11 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (21)
Current report
In March 2026, APS announced its intention to renew the operating licenses for all three units at Palo Verde, which would extend operations from the mid-2040s through the mid-2060s. APS continues to evaluate and pursue options for reliably serving growing customer energy needs and demand.
Current report
In its most recent ASRFP, issued on November 19, 2025, APS is seeking at least 1,000 MW of resources that can reach commercial operation between 2029 and 2031, but APS will also consider projects that can achieve commercial operation earlier or later.
Current report
Long Duration Energy Storage. Continued technological innovation in long duration energy storage, which represents storage products which provide more than four hours of service, has led to decreasing cost of these solutions and an increase in their procurement, development, and deployment. These solutions include lithium and non-lithium battery chemistries, alternative natural gas-fired fuel cells and turbine units, and pumped hydropower. We will continue to evaluate these technologies and their ability to provide reliability, affordability, and balance to our portfolio.
Current report
On March 2 and March 18, 2026, the ACC Staff, RUCO, and other intervenors filed their initial written testimony with the ACC. ACC Staff’s testimony includes the following recommendations, among others, depending on the approval of APS’s proposed FRAM, (i) a $525.2 million total base revenue increase, (ii) a 9.55% to 9.80% return on equity, (iii) a 0.20% return on the increment of fair value, and (iv) 12-months of post-test year plant. RUCO’s testimony includes the following recommendations, among others, depending on the approval of APS’s proposed FRAM, (i) a $200.2 to $278.1 million total base revenue increase, (ii) a 9.00% to 9.20% return on equity, (iii) a 0.0% return on the increment of fair value, and (iv) 0 to 12-months of post-test year plant.
Current report
On April 3, 2026 , APS filed rebuttal testimony addressing the ACC Staff and intervenors’ direct testimonies. The principal provisions of APS’s rebuttal testimony are as follows:
Current report
•a total revenue requirement increase of $694.2 million, or a net revenue requirement increase of $611.3 million after adjustor transfers;
Current report
•maintaining a return on equity request of 10.7%;
Current report
•reducing the return on the increment of fair value from 1.0% to 0.9%;
Current report
•maintaining a post-test year plant request of 12 months and updating the impacted projects, including Ironwood solar and Sundance; and
Current report
•an integrated set of FRAM modifications that are intended to be evaluated together:
Current report
◦allowing for an earnings test “deadband” range of +/- 40 basis points to APS’s authorized return before an adjustment to the FRAM would be required;
Current report
◦limiting projected plant to six months;
Current report
◦retention of the 120-day review and challenge period; and
Current report
◦elimination of the interim rate reset by accepting Commission approval prior to implementation (subject to an automatic reversion provision).
Current report
On May 1, 2026, ACC Staff, RUCO, and other intervenors filed their surrebuttal testimonies with the ACC, which are publicly available on the ACC’s eDocket website. APS is currently evaluating the surrebuttal testimony and plans to file its rejoinder testimony on May 11, 2026.
Current report
El Dorado
Current report
•a decrease of $10 million related to costs for renewable energy programs and similar regulatory programs, which are partially offset in operating revenues and purchased power;
Current report
APS Consolidated
Current report
(a) Subject to certain adjustments.
Current report
•ASU 2025-09, Derivatives and Hedging: Hedge Accounting Improvements, effective for us on January 1, 2027, with early adoption permitted.
Current report
•ASU 2025-10, Government Grants: Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities, effective for us on January 1, 2029, with early adoption permitted.
Removed paragraphs (21)
Previous report
On November 20, 2024, APS issued an ASRFP (the “2024 ASRFP”) seeking 2,000 MW of resources. APS is seeking projects that can reach commercial operation beginning June 1, 2028 through June 1, 2030 but will consider projects that may achieve commercial operation as early as 2026. Additionally, APS is interested in projects that require longer planning, permitting, and construction and can be commercially operational after June 1, 2030. Bids for the 2024 ASRFP were due on February 5, 2025.
Previous report
Cholla ACC Deferral Request
Previous report
On August 14, 2024, APS filed a request with the ACC for a deferral order associated with unrecovered book value and closure costs of Cholla Units 1 and 3. This order would authorize APS to defer, for future recovery in rates, both the expenses necessary to close and decommission coal-fired power plant infrastructure at Cholla, including legally required site environmental remediation, coal combustion residuals (“CCR”) corrective actions, the closure of CCR management facilities, and any unrecovered plant investment and operating costs incurred through and after April 2025. On July 8, 2025, APS withdrew its deferral application, requesting that the costs that would have been covered in the deferral order request instead be addressed in the 2025 Rate Case.
Previous report
Fire Mitigation ACC Deferral Request
Previous report
On August 14, 2024, APS filed a request with the ACC for a deferral order that would authorize APS to defer, for future recovery in rates, operations and maintenance expenses associated with wildfire management, including increased insurance costs. On June 18, 2025, the ACC denied APS’s request and recommended that wildfire related expenses be recovered in APS’s 2025 Rate Case.
Previous report
On August 4, 2023, Pinnacle West entered into an agreement pursuant to which we agreed to sell all of our equity interest in our wholly-owned subsidiary Bright Canyon Energy Corporation (“BCE”) to Ameresco (the “BCE Sale”). The transaction was accounted for as the sale of a business and closed in multiple stages. The final closing of the BCE Sale was completed on January 12, 2024. Certain investments and assets that BCE previously held, including the TransCanyon joint venture and holdings in the two Tenaska wind farm investments, were not included in the BCE Sale and were instead transferred to Pinnacle West Power, LLC (“PNW Power”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle West.
Previous report
El Dorado Investment Company (“El Dorado”)
Previous report
Pension and other postretirement non-service credits, net. Pension and other postretirement non-service credits, net were $9 million lower for the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to prior-service credits becoming fully amortized as of January 31, 2025.
Previous report
Taxes other than income taxes. Taxes other than income taxes were $5 million higher for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to a favorable true-up recognized during the third quarter of 2024.
Previous report
Operating Results – Nine-month period ended September 30, 2025, compared with nine-month period ended September 30, 2024.
Previous report
September 30, 2025 was $601 million, compared with consolidated net income attributable to common shareholders of $616 million for the prior-year period. The results reflect a decrease of approximately $15 million, primarily as a result of the effects of weather, higher operations and maintenance expenses, lower pension and other postretirement non-service credits, net, higher interest charges, and higher depreciation and amortization expenses mostly due to increased plant additions and intangible assets, partially offset by operations ceasing at the Cholla plant. These negative factors were partially offset by increased usage and customer growth, higher transmission service revenues, the impacts of new customer rates, higher AFUDC, and the gain on the sale of BCE recognized during the first quarter of 2024, partially offset by investment gains in El Dorado.
Previous report
Operations and maintenance. Operations and maintenance expenses increased $48 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared with the prior-year period, primarily due to:
Previous report
•a decrease of $15 million related to employee benefit costs; and
Previous report
Depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization expenses were $23 million higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to increased plant in service and intangible assets, partially offset by lower depreciation expense due to operations ceasing at the Cholla plant.
Previous report
Pension and other postretirement non-service credits, net. Pension and other postretirement non-service credits, net were $28 million lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the prior-year period primarily, due to prior-service credits becoming fully amortized as of January 31, 2025.
Previous report
Income taxes. Income taxes were $4 million lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared with the prior-year period, primarily due to lower pre-tax income and higher tax benefits related to employee benefits, offset by lower tax credits.
Previous report
APS
Previous report
APS’s consolidated net cash provided by financing activities was $496 million in 2025 compared to $403 million in 2024, an increase of $93 million in net cash provided primarily due to an increase of $502 million higher issuances of long-term debt; partially offset by the $199 million payment for the Palo Verde sale leaseback noncontrolling interest acquisition, $150 million in lower equity infusions from Pinnacle West and $50 million higher long-term debt repayments.
Previous report
On May 15, 2025, Pinnacle West contributed $300 million into APS in the form of an equity infusion. APS used this contribution to repay the $300 million of its 3.15% senior notes that matured on the same date.
Previous report
•ASU 2023-09, Income Taxes: Improvements to Income Tax Disclosures, effective for us on December 31, 2025.
Previous report
•ASU 2025-03, Business Combinations and Consolidation: Determining the Accounting Acquirer in the Acquisition of a Variable Interest Entity, effective for us on January 1, 2027.
Reworded paragraphs (79)
Previous wording
Pinnacle West derives essentially all of our revenues and earnings from our principal subsidiary, APS. APS is Arizona’s largest and longest-serving electric company and generates safe, affordable and reliable electricity for approximately 1.4 million retail customers in 11 of Arizona’s 15 counties. APS is also the operator and co-owner of Palo Verde Generating Station (“Palo Verde”) — a primary source of electricity for the southwestern United States.
Current wording
Pinnacle West is an investor-owned electric utility holding company based in Phoenix, Arizona with consolidated assets of approximately $31 billion. We derive essentially all of our revenues and earnings from our principal subsidiary, APS. Since 1886, APS and its affiliates have provided energy and energy-related products to people and businesses throughout Arizona. APS is Arizona’s largest and longest-serving electric company and generates safe, affordable and reliable electricity for approximately 1.5 million retail customers in 11 of Arizona’s 15 counties. APS is also the operator and co-owner of Palo Verde — a primary source of electricity for the southwestern United States. Our other active subsidiaries are El Dorado and PNW Power.
Previous wording
As energy demand in Arizona continues to grow, we remain committed to delivering reliable service to our customers. We have a goal of achieving top quartile reliability as compared to peers. Key elements to delivering reliable service include resource and transmission planning to secure resource adequacy, planning and procuring resources to ensure sufficient reserve margins, distribution automation and resiliency investments, predictive and preventative maintenance programs, seasonal readiness programs, emergency preparedness, and securing a reliable supply chain. Securing a reliable grid requires ongoing infrastructure investments in addition to investments to support new customer growth.
Current wording
As energy demand in Arizona continues to grow, we remain committed to delivering reliable service to our customers. We have a goal of achieving top quartile reliability as compared to peers. Key elements to delivering reliable service include resource and transmission planning to maintain resource adequacy, distribution automation and resiliency investments, predictive and preventative maintenance programs, seasonal readiness programs, emergency preparedness, and securing a reliable supply chain. Securing a reliable grid requires ongoing infrastructure investments in addition to investments to support new customer growth.
Previous wording
Balanced Energy Mix. APS strives to procure a balanced energy mix, and we believe this provides the greatest reliability at the lowest cost possible while increasing resiliency. We achieve reliability, in part, through a blend of dispatchable resources, such as natural gas and battery storage, that can provide energy when intermittent resources, such as wind and solar, are unavailable. In its all-source request for proposal (“ASRFP”) issued in 2023, APS contracted for 3,606 megawatts (“MW”) of battery storage, 517 MW of natural gas, 2,649 MW of solar, and 500 MW of wind resources. APS regularly evaluates the best mix of resources based on a changing operating environment, including changes in generation technology, economics, and policy impacts.
Current wording
Balanced Energy Mix. APS strives to procure a balanced energy mix, and we believe this provides the greatest reliability at the lowest cost possible while increasing resiliency. We achieve reliability, in part, through a blend of dispatchable resources, such as natural gas and battery storage, that can provide energy when intermittent resources, such as wind and solar, are unavailable. APS regularly evaluates the best mix of resources based on a changing operating environment, including changes in generation technology, economics, and policy impacts.
Previous wording
There is a need for additional natural gas to support reliability for customers and meet increasing energy needs and existing natural gas pipelines into Arizona are currently 100% committed. As a result, in July 2025, APS executed a gas transportation precedent agreement to secure a long-term supply of natural gas. The new pipeline is expected to be operational by late 2029 and will be owned and operated by a third-party. APS also plans to develop a site near Gila Bend, Arizona that is capable of adding up to 2,000 MW of generation to the state’s energy portfolio. The Desert Sun Power Plant will be a natural gas facility designed to meet Arizona’s rapidly growing needs and support unprecedented demand from large load energy users. This project is planned in two phases, with the first phase expected to serve existing customers and business-as-usual growth through our competitive ASRFP process, and the second phase to enable a new subscription model for large load customers, like data centers and large manufacturers. This subscription model is a commercial construct designed to ensure growth pays for growth while protecting affordability for other customers.
Current wording
Additional natural gas capacity is necessary to support reliable service and meet increasing energy needs. However, existing natural gas pipelines into Arizona are currently committed. As a result, in July 2025, APS executed a gas transportation precedent agreement to secure a long-term supply of natural gas. The new pipeline is expected to be operational by late 2029 and will be owned and operated by a third-party. APS plans to add up to 2,000 MW of flexible natural gas generation to its portfolio, designed to help meet the growing around-the-clock energy needs in Arizona. APS continues to explore additional development opportunities to meet Arizona’s growing needs.
Previous wording
Palo Verde, one of the nation’s largest carbon-free energy resources, serves as a foundational part of APS’s resource portfolio. The plant is a critical asset to the Southwest, generating more than 32 million megawatt-hours annually – enough power for roughly 3.4 million households, or approximately 8.5 million people. Its continued operation is important to a carbon-neutral future for Arizona and the region, as a reliable, continuous, affordable resource and as a large contributor to the local economy. APS owns or leases 29.1% of Units 1, 2, and 3 Palo Verde. In June 2025, APS entered into agreements to purchase two of the three leased interests in Unit 2. The two subject leased interests represented approximately 7% or 94 MW of Unit 2. The transaction closed in September 2025, leaving one remaining lease for approximately 5.2% of Unit 2 that expires in 2033. See Note 8 for more information. The 2025 Rate Case (as defined below) includes pro forma adjustments to account for these acquisitions. APS continues to evaluate and pursue options for reliably serving growing customer energy needs and demand.
Current wording
Palo Verde, one of the nation’s largest carbon-free energy resources, serves as a foundational part of APS’s resource portfolio. The plant is a critical asset to the Southwest, generating more than 32 million MWh – enough power for roughly 3.4 million households, or approximately 8.5 million people. Its continued operation is important to a carbon-neutral future for Arizona and the region, as a reliable, continuous, affordable resource and as a large contributor to the local economy. APS owns or leases 29.1% of Units 1, 2, and 3 Palo Verde. In June 2025, APS entered into agreements to purchase two of the three leased interests in Unit 2. The two subject leased interests represented approximately 7% or 94 MW of Unit 2. The transaction closed in September 2025, leaving one remaining lease for approximately 5.2% of Unit 2 that expires in 2033. See Note 9 for more information. The 2025 Rate Case includes pro forma adjustments to account for these acquisitions.
Previous wording
Wildfire Efforts. Wildfire safety remains a critical focus for APS and other utilities. APS has increased investment in fire mitigation efforts to clear defensible space around its infrastructure, continue ongoing system upgrades, build partnerships with government entities and first responders, and educate customers and communities. APS also increased spend on mitigating the risk associated with trees that could cause hazards, resulting in more of these trees being removed before they could cause outages or wildfires. These programs contribute to customer reliability, responsible forest management and safe communities. With wildfire events in Hawaii, California, and across North America over the last few years, APS has been devoting and intends to continue to devote substantial efforts to analyzing and developing enhancements to its systems and processes to mitigate fire risk within its service territory and communities, including by hardening our infrastructure, deploying new technologies where appropriate, increasing our awareness, implementing operational changes, and enhancing our wildfire response capabilities.
Current wording
Wildfire Efforts. Wildfire safety remains a critical focus for APS and other utilities. APS has increased investment in fire mitigation efforts to clear defensible space around its infrastructure, continue ongoing system upgrades, build partnerships with government entities and first responders, and educate customers and communities. APS also increased spend on grid technology to enable fast-trip relay response, also known as Enhanced Powerline Safety Settings. These programs contribute to customer reliability, fire ignition avoidance, responsible forest management, and safe communities. With wildfire events occurring across the U.S. and North America over the last few years, APS has been devoting and intends to continue to devote substantial efforts to analyzing and developing enhancements to its systems and processes to mitigate fire risk within its service territory and communities, including by hardening our infrastructure, deploying new technologies where appropriate, increasing situational awareness, implementing operational changes, and enhancing our wildfire response capabilities.
Previous wording
APS was selected by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (“DOE”) Grid Deployment Office (“GDO”) to receive up to $70 million in federal money for fire mitigation and grid infrastructure projects. This funding is part of the GDO’s Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership Program and is contingent on APS negotiating and executing final grant agreements with GDO. Additionally, on May 12, 2025, Arizona Governor Hobbs signed into law a bill that requires Arizona electric utilities to develop and seek approval for wildfire mitigation plans and defines the standard of care with respect to wildfire-related claims by reference to such plans. APS continues to evaluate policy and regulatory options, as well as insurance programs, to mitigate the impact of wildfire events.
Current wording
APS was selected by DOE’s Grid Deployment Office (“GDO”) to receive up to $70 million in federal money for fire mitigation and grid infrastructure projects. This funding is part of the GDO’s Grid Resilience and Innovation Partnership Program and is contingent on APS negotiating and executing final grant agreements with GDO. Additionally, on May 12, 2025, Arizona Governor Hobbs signed into law a bill that requires Arizona electric utilities to develop and seek approval for wildfire mitigation plans and defines the standard of care with respect to wildfire-related claims by reference to such plans. Pursuant to that legislation, APS has submitted its Comprehensive Wildfire Mitigation Plan to the Arizona Department of Forestry and Fire Management for review and approval. APS anticipates that process will conclude sometime in the second quarter of 2026; however, APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter. APS continues to evaluate policy and regulatory options, as well as insurance programs, to mitigate the impact of wildfire events.
Previous wording
We are committed to keeping bills as low as possible for our customers while maintaining high levels of reliability. Inflation has dramatically impacted the cost of goods and services in recent years as shown by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which from 2018 through 2024 rose nationally 24.9% and 32.1% in Phoenix. Despite this, APS’s average residential rates remained well-below those inflation figures, rising 16.2% for the same period according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. In recent months, inflationary impacts have eased, with the CPI-U growing 2.9% nationally and 1.4% in Phoenix over the 12 months ended August 2025. As a result of increased tariffs and supply chain constraints, APS amended several of its agreements from its ASRFP issued in 2023 to mitigate these cost impacts. However, APS remains cautious of potential price increases as a result of current and proposed tariffs, which could lead to higher costs and supply chain constraints.
Current wording
We are committed to keeping bills as low as possible for our customers while maintaining high levels of reliability. Inflation has dramatically impacted the cost of goods and services in recent years as shown by the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which from 2018 through 2024 rose nationally 24.9% and 32.1% in Phoenix. Despite this, APS’s average residential rates remained well-below those inflation figures, rising 16.2% for the same period according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Inflation has moderated from earlier highs, with CPI-U rising 2.4% nationally and 1.7% in Phoenix over the 12 months ended February 2026. As a result of increased tariffs and supply chain constraints, APS amended several of its agreements from its ASRFP issued in 2023 to mitigate these cost impacts. However, APS remains cautious of potential price increases as a result of the ongoing Iranian conflict and current and proposed tariffs, which could lead to higher costs and supply chain constraints, while also continuing to monitor the outcome of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision regarding the validity of certain tariffs and any other related executive or legislative action.
Previous wording
APS’s customer affordability initiative includes internal opportunities, such as training and mentoring employees on identifying efficiency opportunities; maintaining inventory to take advantage of lower pricing and avoid expediting fees; entering into long-term contracts to hedge against price volatility, which has allowed APS to mitigate against procurement spend on critical items such as transformers; and implementing automation technologies to enhance efficiencies and increase data-oriented decision making. APS is also seeking to reduce cross-subsidization of customer classes and ensure that growth pays for growth by requesting modifications to its cost allocation methodologies in the 2025 Rate Case. APS continues to seek opportunities to streamline its business processes, mitigate cost increases, increase employee retention, and improve customer satisfaction.
Current wording
APS’s customer affordability initiative includes internal opportunities, such as training and mentoring employees on identifying efficiency opportunities; maintaining inventory to take advantage of lower pricing and avoid expediting fees; entering into long-term contracts to hedge against price volatility, which has allowed APS to mitigate against procurement spend on critical items such as transformers; and implementing automation technologies to enhance efficiencies and increase data-oriented decision making. The customer affordability initiative also includes external opportunities, including a portfolio of customer programs designed to help customers reduce and manage their bills. In the 2025 Rate Case, APS is also seeking to reduce cross-subsidization of customer classes and ensure that growth pays for growth by requesting modifications to its cost allocation methodologies. APS continues to seek opportunities to streamline its business processes, mitigate cost increases, increase employee retention, and improve customer satisfaction.
Previous wording
APS’s Integrated Resource Plan (“IRP”) and competitive ASRFP processes serve important roles in providing reliable and affordable energy to APS’s customers. The IRP process helps identify the amount and type of resources required to reliably meet customer needs, while the ASRFP process seeks to meet those needs in a competitive manner based on cost, ability to meet system requirements, and commercial viability. See “Resource Planning—Prioritizing Reliability and Affordability” below for more information.
Current wording
APS’s IRP and competitive ASRFP processes serve important roles in providing reliable and affordable energy to APS’s customers. The IRP process helps identify the amount and type of resources required to reliably meet customer needs, while the ASRFP process seeks to meet those needs in a competitive manner based on cost, ability to meet system requirements, and commercial viability.
Previous wording
APS has seen increasing demand from large load customers in recent years. In the 2025 Rate Case, APS requested adjustments to rate designs and modification of cost allocation methodologies to ensure growth pays for growth. See “Regulatory Overview” below for more information. In line with the 2025 Rate Case, APS has developed a subscription model it believes will allow for these large load customers to fund the incremental infrastructure needed to serve them through long-term contracts where they cover capital costs and assume development risks, accelerating their path to service and ensuring those infrastructure costs are borne by those customers rather than residential or small business customers.
Current wording
APS has seen increasing demand from large load customers in recent years. In the 2025 Rate Case, APS requested adjustments to rate designs and modification of cost allocation methodologies to ensure growth pays for growth and reduce cross-subsidization by customer classes. In line with the 2025 Rate Case, APS has developed an approach it believes will allow for these large load customers to fund the incremental infrastructure needed to serve them through long-term contracts where they cover capital costs and assume development risks, accelerating their path to service and ensuring those infrastructure costs are borne by those customers rather than residential or small business customers.
Previous wording
There are also external opportunities that allow APS to deliver more affordable energy to customers, such as APS’s participation in western energy markets and programs. APS participated in market design and tariff development of Markets+, a day-ahead and real-time market offering from Southwest Power Pool (“SPP”). The Markets+ tariff was filed with the U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) on March 29, 2024 and was approved on January 16, 2025. APS is a funding party to the implementation phase of Markets+ and expects to go live in the market in October 2027. In addition, APS is participating in the Western Resource Adequacy Program administered by Western Power Pool and plans to transition to full-binding participation as early as summer 2027. These regional efforts are driven by the objectives of reducing customer cost and improving reliability. Until the transition to Markets+, APS will continue to participate in Western Energy Imbalance Market (“WEIM”) as a tool for creating savings for APS’s customers from the real-time only, voluntary market. APS expects that its participation in WEIM and future participation in Markets+ will lower its fuel and purchased-power costs, improve situational awareness for systems operations in the Western Interconnection, and improve integration of APS’s resources.
Current wording
There are also external opportunities that allow APS to deliver more affordable energy to customers, such as APS’s participation in western energy markets and programs. APS participated in market design and tariff development of Markets+, a day-ahead and real-time market offering from the Southwest Power Pool. The Markets+ tariff was filed with FERC on March 29, 2024 and was approved on January 16, 2025. APS is a funding party to the implementation phase of Markets+ and expects to go live in the market in October 2027. In addition, APS is participating in the Western Resource Adequacy Program administered by Western Power Pool and plans to transition to full-binding participation in 2027. These regional efforts are driven by the objectives of reducing customer cost and improving reliability. Until the transition to Markets+, APS will continue to participate in the Western Energy Imbalance Market (“WEIM”) as a tool for creating savings for APS’s customers from the real-time only, voluntary market. APS expects that its participation in the WEIM and future participation in Markets+ will lower its fuel and purchased-power costs, improve situational awareness for systems operations in the Western Interconnection, and improve integration of APS’s resources.
Previous wording
APS has a diverse portfolio of existing and planned resources, including biomass, biogas, coal, energy storage, geothermal, natural gas, nuclear, solar, and wind. Maintaining a balanced and diverse portfolio of resources will ensure continued reliable service to our customers in the most affordable manner possible. Every three years, APS performs an IRP, a comprehensive study to identify what resources will be necessary to safely, reliably, and affordably meet the demand and energy needs of its customers over the next 15 years. In November 2023, APS released its latest IRP, which identified forecasted customer demand and energy needs growing at an unprecedented rate. In developing the IRP, APS considered how factors such as forecasted economic growth, impacts from weather, and new resource technology availability impact the amount and type of resources required to reliably and affordably meet customer needs. These factors, among others, were used to develop a plan that identified a balanced mix of diverse energy-generating resources to reliably serve customers’ future energy needs. To help ensure competitive costs for resources procured by APS, APS regularly issues competitive bid solicitations through the ASRFP process, with the most recent ASRFP being issued in 2024. These ASRFPs are open to bids for all resource types, including customer-scale (behind the meter) and utility-scale (in front of the meter) resources.
Current wording
APS remains focused on providing reliable energy at the lowest cost possible while striving to lower emissions over time and continues to look for opportunities to support reliability through dispatchable resources, such as gas and the potential extension of coal beyond 2031. APS’s diverse portfolio of existing and planned resources includes biomass, biogas, coal, energy storage, geothermal, natural gas, nuclear, solar, and wind. Every three years, APS performs an IRP, a comprehensive study to identify what resources will be necessary to safely, reliably, and affordably meet the demand and energy needs of its customers over the next 15 years. In November 2023, APS released its latest IRP, which identified forecasted customer demand and energy needs growing at an unprecedented rate. In developing the IRP, APS considered how factors such as forecasted economic growth, impacts from weather, and new resource technology availability impact the amount and type of resources required to reliably and affordably meet customer needs. These factors, among others, were used to develop a plan that identified a balanced mix of diverse energy-generating resources to reliably serve customers’ future energy needs. APS expects to file its next IRP later in 2026, which will provide an updated view on the resource types and volumes necessary to maintain reliability for a rapidly expanding customer base. To help ensure competitive costs for resources procured by APS, APS regularly issues competitive bid solicitations through the ASRFP process, with the most recent ASRFP being issued in 2025. These ASRFPs are open to bids for all resource types, including customer-scale (behind the meter) and utility-scale (in front of the meter) resources.
Previous wording
APS selects projects out of ASRFPs based on cost, ability to meet system requirements, and commercial viability, taking into consideration timing and likelihood of successful contracting and development. Under current market conditions, APS must aggressively contract for resources that can withstand supply chain and other geopolitical pressures. Guided by IRP-established timelines and quantities, APS maintains a flexible approach that allows it to optimize system reliability and customer affordability through the ASRFP process. Agreements for the development and completion of future resources are subject to various conditions, including successful siting, permitting and interconnection to the electric grid.
Current wording
APS selects projects out of ASRFPs based on cost, ability to meet system requirements, and commercial viability, taking into consideration timing and likelihood of successful contracting and development. Guided by IRP-established timelines and quantities, APS maintains a flexible approach that allows it to optimize system reliability and customer affordability through the ASRFP process. Agreements for the development and completion of future resources are subject to various conditions, including successful siting, permitting and interconnection to the electric grid. Consistent with recent ASRFPs, APS remains focused on contracting for resources that can withstand supply chain pressures and volatility and seeks a balanced portfolio that is resilient to other external pressures, including those arising from the macroeconomic and geopolitical environment.
Previous wording
On June 30, 2023, APS issued an ASRFP pursuant to which APS procured 3,606 MW of battery storage, 517 MW of natural gas, 2,649 MW of solar, and 500 MW of wind resources expected to be in service from 2026 to 2028.
Current wording
In terms of recent solicitations, APS issued an ASRFP on June 30, 2023, pursuant to which APS procured 3,606 MW of battery storage, 517 MW of natural gas, 2,649 MW of solar, and 500 MW of wind resources expected to be in service from 2026 to 2028. APS issued another ASRFP on November 20, 2024, pursuant to which it signed an amendment and extension to each of two existing gas tolling agreements, securing 600 MW under each agreement through 2038 and 2046, respectively. The scope of projects being negotiated out of the 2024 ASRFP reflects both the expanse of the 2023 ASRFP and the reality of adjusting to tariffs and changing federal policy.
Previous wording
APS has an aspirational goal to be carbon-neutral by 2050. This means that for any greenhouse gas emissions still produced by our generation resources as of 2050, we will aim to offset these emissions elsewhere. This goal reflects APS’s interest in new innovation and market transformations that address carbon emissions, while relying on the IRP process to help determine the most responsible path forward. APS remains focused on providing reliable energy at the lowest cost possible while striving to lower emissions over time and continues to look for opportunities to support reliability through dispatchable resources, such as gas and the potential extension of coal beyond 2031.
Current wording
APS has an aspirational goal to be carbon-neutral by 2050. This means that for any GHG emissions still produced by our generation resources as of 2050, we will aim to offset these emissions elsewhere. This goal reflects APS’s interest in new innovation and market transformations that address carbon emissions, while relying on the IRP and ASRFP processes to help determine the path forward.
Previous wording
Additionally, APS offers a customer assistance program, including up to a 60% bill discount for vulnerable customers, flexible payment arrangements, and emergency utility bill assistance. To ensure customers in need are connected to these programs, we partner with more than one hundred community action agencies across our service territory to train representatives who serve our shared customers.
Current wording
Additionally, APS offers a customer assistance program, including up to a 60% bill discount for vulnerable customers, flexible payment arrangements, and emergency utility bill assistance. To ensure customers in need are connected to these programs, we partner with nearly one hundred community action agencies across our service territory to train representatives who serve our shared customers.
Previous wording
New Nuclear Generation. Along with other Arizona electric utilities, APS is exploring additional nuclear generation to provide around-the-clock carbon-free energy to meet rising energy demands in Arizona. APS has been monitoring emerging nuclear technologies, such as small modular nuclear reactors (“SMRs”). SMRs are typically designed to generate 300 MW or less of energy per unit compared to, for example, the 1,400 MW per unit generated at Palo Verde. The utilities have applied for a grant from DOE to begin preliminary exploration of a potential site for additional nuclear energy for Arizona. The grant could support a three-year site selection process and possible preparation of an early site permit application to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”).
Current wording
New Nuclear Generation. Along with other Arizona electric utilities, APS is exploring additional nuclear generation to provide around-the-clock carbon-free energy to meet rising energy demands in Arizona. APS has been monitoring emerging nuclear technologies, ranging from newer proposed and installed versions of large-scale reactors to small modular nuclear reactors. Small modular nuclear reactors are typically designed to generate 300 MW or less of energy per unit compared to, for example, the 1,400 MW per unit generated at Palo Verde. The utilities have applied for a grant from DOE to begin preliminary exploration of a potential site for additional nuclear energy for Arizona. The grant could support a three-year site selection process and possible preparation of an early site permit application to NRC.
Previous wording
Carbon Capture. Carbon Capture Utilization and Storage (“CCUS”) technologies can isolate CO 2 and either sequester it permanently in geologic formations or convert it for use in products. Currently, almost all existing fossil fuel generators do not control carbon emissions the way they control emissions of other air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide or oxides of nitrogen. CCUS technologies are still in the demonstration phase and while they show promise, they are still being tested in real-world conditions. These technologies could potentially reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuel-fired generation.
Current wording
Carbon Capture. CCS technologies can isolate carbon dioxide and either sequester it permanently in geologic formations or convert it for use in products. Currently, almost all existing fossil fuel generators do not control carbon emissions the way they control emissions of other air pollutants such as sulfur dioxide or oxides of nitrogen. CCS technologies are still in the demonstration phase and while they show promise, they are still being tested in real-world conditions. These technologies could potentially reduce carbon emissions from fossil fuel-fired generation.
Previous wording
Artificial Intelligence. To address the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (“AI”) technology risks and opportunities, APS has developed an AI strategy to responsibly utilize AI to advance our business strategy, enhance customer and employee experiences, and optimize operational reliability. At the core of our AI strategy is a robust governance model that develops guidance, policies, and relevant sub-strategies for the execution of AI projects at the Company. To ensure compliance with data security, reliability requirements, and our Code of Ethical Conduct, governance and oversight are provided by leadership and experts from our information technology, cybersecurity, human resources, ethics, supply chain, legal, and nuclear generation teams.
Current wording
Artificial Intelligence. To address the rapid advancement of AI technology risks and opportunities, APS has developed an AI strategy to responsibly utilize AI to advance our business strategy, enhance customer and employee experiences, and optimize operational reliability. At the core of our AI strategy is a robust governance model that develops guidance, policies, and relevant sub-strategies for the execution of AI projects at the Company. To ensure compliance with data security, reliability requirements, and our Code of Ethical Conduct, governance and oversight are provided by leadership and experts from our information technology, cybersecurity, human resources, ethics, supply chain, legal, and nuclear generation teams.
Previous wording
On June 13, 2025, APS filed an application with the ACC (the “2025 Rate Case”) seeking a net base rate increase of $579.5 million, which represents a 13.99% net increase. The requested net increase addresses a total base revenue deficiency of $662.4 million, offset by proposed adjustor transfers of cost recovery to base rates.
Current wording
On June 13, 2025, APS filed the 2025 Rate Case application with the ACC seeking a net base rate increase of $579.5 million, which represents a 13.99% net increase. The requested net increase addresses a total base revenue deficiency of $662.4 million, offset by proposed adjustor transfers of cost recovery to base rates.
Previous wording
•a rate of $0.043881 per kilowatt-hour (“kWh”) for the portion of APS’s base rates attributable to fuel and purchased power costs;
Current wording
•a rate of $0.043881 per kWh for the portion of APS’s base rates attributable to fuel and purchased power costs;
Previous wording
•adjustments to rate designs to reduce cross-subsidization by certain customer classes;
Current wording
•adjustments to rate designs, including direct assignment of costs, to reduce cross-subsidization by certain customer classes;
Previous wording
•implementation of a “Formula Rate Adjustment Mechanism” (“FRAM”) to assist with reducing regulatory lag and allow for rate gradualism;
Current wording
•implementation of a FRAM to assist with reducing regulatory lag and allow for rate gradualism;
Previous wording
•elimination of the Lost Fixed Cost Recovery Adjustment Mechanism (“LFCR”) following the first annual adjustment pursuant to the FRAM; and
Current wording
•elimination of the LFCR following the first annual adjustment pursuant to the FRAM; and
Previous wording
•modification to the System Reliability Benefit Mechanism (“SRB”) due to the Formula Rate Adjustment Mechanism proposal.
Current wording
•modification to the SRB due to the FRAM proposal.
Previous wording
On October 28, 2022, APS filed an application with the ACC (the “2022 Rate Case”) for an increase in retail base rates, and on January 25, 2024, an Administrative Law Judge issued a Recommended Opinion and Order (“ROO”), as corrected on February 6, 2024 (the “2022 Rate Case ROO”).
Current wording
On October 28, 2022, APS filed an application with the ACC (the “2022 Rate Case”) for an increase in retail base rates, and on January 25, 2024, an Administrative Law Judge issued a ROO, as corrected on February 6, 2024 (the “2022 Rate Case ROO”).
Previous wording
On February 22, 2024, the ACC approved the 2022 Rate Case ROO with certain amendments that resulted in, among other things, (i) an approximately $491.7 million increase in the annual base revenue requirement, (ii) a 9.55% return on equity, (iii) a 0.25% return on the increment of fair value rate base greater than original cost, (iv) an effective fair value rate of return of 4.39%, (v) a return set at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital on the net prepaid pension asset and net other post-employment benefit liability in rate base, (vi) an adjustment to generation maintenance and outage expense to reflect a more reasonable level of test year costs, (vii) approval of the SRB mechanism with modifications to customer notifications, procedural timelines and the inclusion of any qualifying technology and fuel source bid received through an ASRFP, and (viii) recovery of all Demand Side Management (“DSM”) costs through the DSM Adjustment Charge (“DSMAC”) rather than through base rates.
Current wording
On February 22, 2024, the ACC approved the 2022 Rate Case ROO with certain amendments that resulted in, among other things, (i) an approximately $491.7 million increase in the annual base revenue requirement, (ii) a 9.55% return on equity, (iii) a 0.25% return on the increment of fair value rate base greater than original cost, (iv) an effective fair value rate of return of 4.39%, (v) a return set at the Company’s weighted average cost of capital on the net prepaid pension asset and net other post-employment benefit liability in rate base, (vi) an adjustment to generation maintenance and outage expense to reflect a more reasonable level of test year costs, (vii) approval of the SRB mechanism with modifications to customer notifications, procedural timelines and the inclusion of any qualifying technology and fuel source bid received through an ASRFP, and (viii) recovery of all DSM costs through the DSM Adjustment Charge (“DSMAC”) rather than through base rates.
Previous wording
Six intervenors and the Attorney General of Arizona requested rehearing on various issues included in the ACC’s decision, such as the grid access charge (“GAC”) for solar customers, the SRB, and Coal Community Transition funding. On April 15, 2024, the ACC granted, in part, the rehearing applications of the Attorney General, Arizona Solar Energy Industries Association (“AriSEIA”), Solar Energy Industries Association (“SEIA”), and Vote Solar specifically to review whether the GAC rate is just and reasonable, including whether it should be higher or lower, whether the GAC rate constitutes a discriminatory fee to solar customers, and whether omission of a GAC charge is discriminatory to non-solar customers. All other applications for rehearing were denied. A limited rehearing was held October 28 through November 1, 2024. Following the limited rehearing, an Administrative Law Judge issued a ROO (the “Limited Rehearing ROO”) on December 3, 2024. The Limited Rehearing ROO recommended affirming the GAC as just and reasonable and that the GAC is not discriminatory to solar customers and the absence of a GAC is not discriminatory to non-solar customers. On December 17, 2024, the ACC approved the Limited Rehearing ROO with an amendment that requires APS in its next rate case to propose a revenue allocation based on a site-load cost of service study in order to bring further parity in revenue collection between solar and non-solar customers. SEIA, AriSEIA, Vote Solar, the Arizona Attorney General, and two individual customers have filed requests for rehearing of the ACC’s December 17, 2024 decision on the rehearing. The ACC has taken no action on these requests. In addition, each of these parties has subsequently filed an appeal to the Arizona Court of Appeals seeking review of the ACC’s decisions regarding the GAC and on rehearing. APS cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
Current wording
Six intervenors and the Attorney General of Arizona requested rehearing on various issues included in the ACC’s decision, such as the GAC for solar customers, the SRB, and Coal Community Transition funding. On April 15, 2024, the ACC granted, in part, the rehearing applications of the Attorney General, AriSEIA, SEIA, and Vote Solar specifically to review whether the GAC rate is just and reasonable, including whether it should be higher or lower, whether the GAC rate constitutes a discriminatory fee to solar customers, and whether omission of a GAC charge is discriminatory to non-solar customers. All other applications for rehearing were denied. A limited rehearing was held October 28 through November 1, 2024. Following the limited rehearing, an Administrative Law Judge issued the Limited Rehearing ROO on December 3, 2024, which recommended affirming the GAC as just and reasonable and that the GAC is not discriminatory to solar customers and the absence of a GAC is not discriminatory to non-solar customers. On December 17, 2024, the ACC approved the Limited Rehearing ROO with an amendment that requires APS in its next rate case to propose a revenue allocation based on a site-load cost of service study in order to bring further parity in revenue collection between solar and non-solar customers. SEIA, AriSEIA, Vote Solar, the Arizona Attorney General, and two individual customers have filed requests for rehearing of the ACC’s December 17, 2024 decision on the rehearing. The ACC has taken no action on these requests. In addition, each of these parties has subsequently filed an appeal to the Arizona Court of Appeals seeking review of the ACC’s decisions regarding the GAC and on rehearing. On February 25, 2026, parties provided oral arguments before the Court of Appeals. APS cannot predict the outcome of these proceedings.
Previous wording
On January 5, 2023, the ACC opened a new docket to explore the possibility of modifications to the ACC’s historical test year rules. The ACC requested comments and held two workshops exploring ways to reduce regulatory lag, including alternative ratemaking structures such as future test years, hybrid test years, and formula rates. On December 3, 2024, the ACC approved a policy statement regarding formula rate plans. The policy statement provides regulated utilities with the opportunity to propose formula rate plans in future rate cases. On March 28, 2025, the Residential Utility Consumer Office (“RUCO”), the Arizona Large Customer Group (“ALCG”), and an individual customer filed a lawsuit challenging the ACC’s authority to issue the formula rate policy statement outside of Arizona’s formula rulemaking process. On June 13, 2025, the lawsuit challenging the ACC’s formula rate policy was dismissed by the Superior Court of Maricopa County. Following the dismissal, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Arizona Court of Appeals as well as a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Supreme Court. The Supreme Court declined to exercise jurisdiction on the Petition for Special Action. The plaintiffs have also filed a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Court of Appeals, which has accepted jurisdiction to determine whether the case should be remanded back to the Superior Court for expedited consideration of the merits. Further special action proceedings remain pending at this time. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Current wording
On January 5, 2023, the ACC opened a new docket to explore the possibility of modifications to the ACC’s historical test year rules. The ACC requested comments and held two workshops exploring ways to reduce regulatory lag, including alternative ratemaking structures such as future test years, hybrid test years, and formula rates. On December 3, 2024, the ACC approved a policy statement regarding formula rate plans. The policy statement provides regulated utilities with the opportunity to propose formula rate plans in future rate cases. On March 28, 2025, RUCO, ALCG, and an individual customer filed a lawsuit challenging the ACC’s authority to issue the formula rate policy statement outside of Arizona’s formula rulemaking process. On June 13, 2025, the lawsuit challenging the ACC’s formula rate policy was dismissed by the Superior Court of Maricopa County. Following the dismissal, the plaintiffs filed an appeal with the Arizona Court of Appeals as well as a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Supreme Court. The Supreme Court declined to exercise jurisdiction on the Petition for Special Action. The plaintiffs also filed a Petition for Special Action with the Arizona Court of Appeals, which has accepted jurisdiction to determine whether the case should be remanded back to the Superior Court for expedited consideration of the merits. On November 21, 2025, the Arizona Court of Appeals ruled that the issue should be remanded back to the Superior Court to determine whether the ACC’s formula rate policy must go through a formal rulemaking process. In response, APS, the ACC, and several other Arizona utility companies filed petitions for review of the Court of Appeals decision with the Arizona Supreme Court, which is pending at this time. APS cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Previous wording
Pinnacle West is the primary beneficiary of a protected cell captive insurance cell (the “Captive”). The Captive provides insurance coverage to Pinnacle West and our subsidiaries that supplements commercial and mutual insurance coverage. The Captive insures Pinnacle West and its subsidiaries for terrorism coverage, excess liability including certain wildfire coverage, excess property insurance, and excess employment practice liability. The Captive policies exclude nuclear liability at Palo Verde. See Note 8. The Captive may hold investment assets in cash, cash equivalents, and equity and fixed income instruments.
Current wording
Pinnacle West is the primary beneficiary of a protected cell captive insurance cell. The Captive provides insurance coverage to Pinnacle West and our subsidiaries that supplements commercial and mutual insurance coverage. The Captive insures Pinnacle West and its subsidiaries for terrorism coverage, excess liability including certain wildfire coverage, excess property insurance, and excess employment practice liability. The Captive policies exclude nuclear liability at Palo Verde. See Note 9. The Captive may hold investment assets in cash, cash equivalents, and equity and fixed income instruments.
Previous wording
The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) significantly expanded the availability of tax credits for investments in clean energy generation technologies and energy storage. Key provisions included (i) an extension of tax credits for solar and wind generation, including a new option for solar investments to claim a Production Tax Credit (“PTC”) in lieu of the Investment Tax Credit (“ITC”) beginning in 2022; (ii) expansion of the ITC to cover stand-alone energy storage technology beginning in 2023; (iii) introduction of technology neutral clean energy ITCs and PTCs beginning in 2025; and (iv) introduction of a new PTC for nuclear energy produced by existing nuclear energy plants, available from 2024 through 2032.
Current wording
The IRA significantly expanded the availability of tax credits for investments in clean energy generation technologies and energy storage. Key provisions included (i) an extension of tax credits for solar and wind generation, including a new option for solar investments to claim a PTC in lieu of the ITC beginning in 2022; (ii) expansion of the ITC to cover stand-alone energy storage technology beginning in 2023; (iii) introduction of technology neutral clean energy ITCs and PTCs beginning in 2025; and (iv) introduction of a new Nuclear PTC, available from 2024 through 2032.
Previous wording
The Company believes that its projects which are currently under construction will continue to qualify for IRA tax credits. The Company is continuing to analyze the OBBBA and is awaiting regulations and other guidance as to the application of these new rules to projects not currently under construction.
Current wording
The Company believes that its projects which are currently under construction will continue to qualify for IRA tax credits. See Note 5 for information on Palo Verde’s Nuclear PTC. The Company is continuing to analyze the OBBBA and is awaiting regulations and other guidance as to the application of these new rules to projects not currently under construction.
Previous wording
PNW Power’s investments include TransCanyon, a 50/50 joint venture that was formed in 2014 with BHE U.S. Transmission LLC, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. TransCanyon is pursuing independent electric transmission opportunities within the 11 U.S. states that comprise the Western Interconnection, excluding opportunities related to transmission service that would otherwise be provided under the tariffs of the retail service territories of the TransCanyon partners’ utility affiliates. The DOE’s GDO selected TransCanyon to enter into capacity contract negotiations for up to 25% of the Cross-Tie 500-kilovolt transmission line (“Cross-Tie”) as part of the Transmission Facilitation Program. The agreement was executed on June 12, 2024; however, on September 5, 2025, TransCanyon sent a notice to terminate the agreement that will be effective November 4, 2025. The proposed Cross-Tie project includes a 214-mile transmission line connecting Utah and Nevada that is intended to help improve grid reliability and relieve congestion on other transmission lines.
Current wording
PNW Power holds certain investments and assets that were previously held by BCE, a former subsidiary of Pinnacle West that was sold in 2024. PNW Power’s investments include TransCanyon, a 50/50 joint venture that was formed in 2014 with BHE U.S. Transmission LLC, a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. TransCanyon is pursuing independent electric transmission opportunities within the 11 U.S. states that comprise the Western Interconnection, excluding opportunities related to transmission service that would otherwise be provided under the tariffs of the retail service territories of the TransCanyon partners’ utility affiliates. These opportunities include the proposed 500-kV Cross-Tie transmission project (the “Cross-Tie Project”), which includes a 214-mile transmission line connecting Utah and Nevada that is intended to help improve grid reliability and relieve congestion on other transmission lines. On December 18, 2025, the Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management issued a Record of Decision permitting the development of Cross-Tie Project, which became non-appealable in late January 2026.
Previous wording
PNW Power’s investments also include minority ownership positions in two wind farms operated by Tenaska Energy, Inc. and Tenaska Energy Holdings, LLC, the 242 MW Clear Creek and the 250 MW Nobles 2 wind farms. Clear Creek achieved commercial operation in May 2020; however, in the fourth quarter of 2022, PNW Power’s equity method investment was fully impaired. Nobles 2 achieved commercial operation in December 2020. Both wind farms deliver power under long-term power purchase agreements. PNW Power indirectly owns 9.9% of Clear Creek and 5.1% of Nobles 2.
Current wording
PNW Power’s investments also include minority ownership positions in two wind farms operated by Tenaska Energy, Inc. and Tenaska Energy Holdings, LLC, the 242 MW Clear Creek and the 250 MW Nobles 2 wind farms. Clear Creek achieved commercial operation in May 2020; however, in the fourth quarter of 2022, PNW Power’s equity method investment was fully impaired. Nobles 2 achieved commercial operation in December 2020. Both wind farms deliver power under long-term PPAs. PNW Power indirectly owns 9.9% of Clear Creek and 5.1% of Nobles 2.
Previous wording
El Dorado is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Pinnacle West. El Dorado owns debt investments and minority interests in several energy-related investments and Arizona community-based ventures. In particular, El Dorado has committed to and/or holds the following:
Current wording
El Dorado owns debt investments and minority interests in several energy-related investments and Arizona community-based ventures. In particular, El Dorado has committed to and/or holds the following:
Previous wording
•$25 million investment in the Energy Impact Partners fund, of which approximately $20 million has been funded as of September 30, 2025. Energy Impact Partners is an organization that focuses on fostering innovation and supporting the transformation of the utility industry.
Current wording
•$25 million investment in the Energy Impact Partners fund, of which approximately $21 million has been funded as of March 31, 2026. Energy Impact Partners is an organization that focuses on fostering innovation and supporting the transformation of the utility industry.
Previous wording
•$25 million investment in AZ-VC Fund I, LLC (formerly invisionAZ Fund) (“AZ-VC”), of which approximately $14.3 million has been funded as of September 30, 2025. AZ-VC is a fund focused on analyzing, investing, managing, and otherwise dealing with investments in privately-held early stage and emerging growth technology companies and businesses primarily based in Arizona, or based in other jurisdictions and having existing or potential strategic or economic ties to companies or other interests in Arizona.
Current wording
•$25 million investment in Copper Sky, previously AZ-VC, of which approximately $17 million has been funded as of March 31, 2026. Copper Sky is a fund focused on analyzing, investing, managing, and otherwise dealing with investments in privately-held early stage and emerging growth technology companies and businesses primarily based in Arizona, or based in other jurisdictions and having existing or potential strategic or economic ties to companies or other interests in Arizona.
Previous wording
•$7.5 million investment in Westly Seed Fund, of which approximately $1.5 million has been funded as of September 30, 2025. Westly Seed Fund is focused on supporting entrepreneurs involved in the energy, mobility, building, and industrial sectors.
Current wording
•$7.5 million investment in Westly Seed Fund, of which approximately $2 million has been funded as of March 31, 2026. Westly Seed Fund is focused on supporting entrepreneurs involved in the energy, mobility, building, and industrial sectors.
Previous wording
•Equity investment in SAI Advanced Power Solutions, Inc. (“SAI”), a private corporation that manufactures electrical switchgear equipment used by data centers. El Dorado accounts for this investment under the equity method and has an investment carrying value of $16.7 million as of September 30, 2025.
Current wording
•Equity investment in SAI, a private corporation that manufactures electrical switchgear equipment used by data centers. El Dorado accounts for this investment under the equity method and has an investment carrying value of approximately $26 million as of March 31, 2026.
Showing the first 40 of 79 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
◦elimination of the SRB and TEAM following the first annual adjustment pursuant to the FRAM;
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
Program, which takes into account the forward sale agreements in effect as of March 31, 2026. Pinnacle West also has forward sale agreements from an equity offering in February 2024 in effect as of March 31, 2026. See “Financing Cash Flows and Liquidity—Equity Offerings” below and Note 13 for more information.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (12)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Pinnacle West is an investor-owned electric utility holding company based in Phoenix, Arizona with consolidated assets of approximately $30 billion. Since 1886, Pinnacle West and our affiliates have provided energy and energy-related products to people and businesses throughout Arizona.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•a decrease of $2 million related to transmission, distribution, and customer service costs;
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•an increase of $5 million related to information technology costs; and
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Our consolidated net income attributable to common shareholders for the nine months ended
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The following table presents net income attributable to common shareholders compared with the prior year for Pinnacle West consolidated and for APS consolidated (dollars in millions):
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
(a) Operating revenues less fuel and purchased power is a non-GAAP financial measure. As reconciled in the table above, this amount is derived by the difference between the GAAP financial statement line item Operating revenues less the GAAP financial statement line item Fuel and purchased power as presented on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Operating revenues, less fuel and purchased power is used by Pinnacle West to assess whether customer revenues adequately cover fuel and purchased power costs. This metric is not defined by GAAP and may differ from similar measures used by other companies. This measure is not a substitute for operating income under GAAP.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Operating revenues less fuel and purchased power. Operating revenues less fuel and purchased power expenses were $95 million higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared with the prior-year period. The following table summarizes the major components of this change (dollars in millions):
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•an increase of $18 million related to corporate resource costs;
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•an increase of $2 million related to nuclear generation costs;
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•a decrease of $1 million for other miscellaneous factors.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Other income and expense, net. Other income and expense, net were $3 million lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to the gain on the sale of BCE recognized during the first quarter of 2024 and lower PSA interest income, partially offset by investment gains in El Dorado. The difference between APS’s and Pinnacle West’s other income and expense, net is primarily related to Pinnacle West’s gain on the sale of BCE and the gain in investment in El Dorado.
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
Interest charges, net of allowance for borrowed funds and equity funds used during construction. Interest charges, net of allowance for funds used during construction, were $8 million higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to the prior-year period, primarily due to higher debt balances and lower allowance for borrowed funds, partially offset by higher allowance for equity funds.