CLEVELAND-CLIFFS INC.
For the period ended Dec 31, 2024. Filed Apr 2, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Dec 31, 2024 · Filed Apr 2, 2025
Contents
42 | CLF 2025 PROXY STATEMENT
Board’s assessment of the CEO’s performance in the case of grants made to the CEO. None of the target percentage opportunities were increased over target percentage opportunities in effect for 2023.
Administrative Process. Long-term incentive awards for our NEOs are granted annually on the date of the Compensation Committee’s approval or a later date as set by the Compensation Committee. Grants for new or newly promoted NEOs or for long-term retention are approved by the Compensation Committee at the next regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting following the hire or promotion date or in a special meeting, as needed. We do not schedule grants to coordinate with the release of material non-public information. All NEOs’ grants in 2024 were awarded under the 2021 Equity Plan.
2022, 2023 and 2024 Long-Term Incentive Grants. The Compensation Committee divided the annual long-term incentive grants to the NEOs into three components: 34% performance cash incentive awards; 33% performance share awards; and 33% restricted stock units.
Performance Cash Incentive Awards and Performance Share Awards. The performance cash incentive awards and the performance share awards granted provide an opportunity to earn cash and shares based on our performance over a three-year period, with potential funding from zero to 200% of the target grant depending on the level of attained performance. The cash and shares are earned based on achieving relative TSR, as compared to comparator companies’ returns in the metals and mining industry (performance cash and shares comparator companies are identified below). Payout is not capped at a specific percentage in the event of negative TSR over the performance period due to the volatility of our industry in comparison to the broader market and our focus on outperforming our peers.
The calibration of the pay-for-performance relationship for the grants is as follows, and payout is interpolated for performance between threshold, target and maximum levels:
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PERFORMANCE FACTOR | WEIGHT | BELOW THRESHOLD | THRESHOLD | TARGET | MAXIMUM |
| Relative TSR | 100% | Below 25th Percentile | 25th Percentile | 50th Percentile | 75th Percentile |
| Payout | —% | 50% | 100% | 200% | |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.