INVESTORS TITLE CO

To the Shareholders, Board of Directors, and Audit Committee

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Investors Title Company and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes and schedules (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of a critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Reserve for Claims

As described in Notes 1 and 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company’s unpaid loss and losses adjustment expenses are established using estimated amounts required to settle claims for which notice has been received (reported) and the amount estimated to be required to satisfy incurred claims of policyholders which may be reported in the future (incurred but not reported, or “IBNR”). As of December 31, 2025, the Company had approximately $38.1 million in reserve for claims. Management records a provision for future claim payments at the time the related premium revenue is recognized by applying a loss provision rate against net premiums written. Management determines its loss provision rate through the consideration of factors such as the Company’s historical claim experience, case reserve estimates on reported claims, large claims, actuarial projections, and other relevant factors. The Company’s specialist utilizes accepted actuarial methodologies when performing the actuarial projections. Management’s assumptions include assumed comparability to its historical claims experience unless factors, such as loss experience and charged premium rates, change significantly, as well as assumptions around large losses related to fraud and defalcation.

We identified the reserve for claims as a critical audit matter. The principal considerations for our determination of the reserve for claims as a critical audit matter were management’s use of significant actuarial estimates and assumptions to estimate the reserve for claims, including the selection of actuarial methods, loss development factors, and expected loss ratios, as well as the high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in determining the reasonableness of the actuarial assumptions and methodologies utilized, and our use of an auditor’s specialist.

Our audit procedures related to the reserve for claims included the following, among others:

•We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and implementation, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s controls over the process for developing its reserve for claims. This included, among others, the controls over the determination of the actuarial methods and assumptions utilized to support the reserve for claims calculations and controls over the completeness and accuracy of historical loss data utilized in the reserve for claims calculations.

•We engaged a third-party actuary with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in evaluating the reasonableness of the reserving methodologies utilized by the Company’s specialist and evaluating the reasonableness of the assumptions related to loss development factors and expected loss ratios.

•We tested the inputs utilized by the Company’s specialist in developing the reserve for claims. This included testing the accuracy and completeness of the data provided to the Company’s specialist.

•We evaluated the reasonableness of the significant assumptions utilized by the Company in developing the reserve for claims.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2004.

/s/Forvis Mazars, LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina