SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 5, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Feb 5, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-07.
0000092380-25-000024
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-05.
0000092380-26-000004
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 165 previous paragraphs and 164 current paragraphs.
92 unchanged; 57 reworded; 13 added; 13 removed; 3 previous and 2 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (13)
Current report
•The Company's business, strategic plans, and profitabilitycan be significantly affected by the availability of jet fuel, fuel prices, and volatility of fuel prices, and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel.
Current report
•Introducing a new aircraft manufacturer or fleet type could impose significant operational complexities, regulatory requirements, and costs on the Company.
Current report
•The Company is expanding its use of AI and machine-learning, and any failure in its related strategy, compliance with regulations, or risk management could materially adversely affect its operations, reputation, and/or financial position.
Current report
•The Company has adopted certain provisions in its Bylaws that could increase costs to bring a claim, discourage claims, limit the ability of the Company’s Shareholders to bring a claim, or limit the ability of the Company’s Shareholders to bring a claim in certain judicial forums.
Current report
The Company’s ability to mitigate the impact of fuel price increases or volatility through increased fares or fees could also be limited by the competitive nature of the airline industry and the unpredictability of the market for air travel. Passengers often purchase tickets well in advance of their travel, and the Company may not be able to increase fares, impose fuel surcharges, increase revenues, or decrease other operating costs sufficiently to offset rapid or prolonged fuel price increases. Further, the Company faces the risk that higher fares may drive a decrease in air travel demand generally or a disproportionate decrease in leisure travel due to price sensitivity. Conversely, prolonged periods of low fuel prices may hinder the Company’s ability to execute on its strategic initiatives as other carriers compete by offering lower fares, flying longer-haul routes, or increasing capacity.
Current report
The Company may not be able to procure aircraft in the future in a timely manner or on favorable commercial terms, which could limit the Company’s growth or negatively affect the Company’s cost structure and competitive position.
Current report
The Company’s ability to execute its growth, fleet modernization, and strategic and operational plans may be affected by the timely procurement of additional aircraft on commercially favorable terms. Industry demand for new aircraft may exceed supply, and manufacturers may face production constraints, supply chain shortages, changes in production rates, labor disruptions, or order backlogs that limit availability of aircraft. The Company may also encounter less favorable pricing, reduced delivery slot availability, more restrictive contractual terms, or diminished negotiating leverage with aircraft manufacturers, sellers, or lessors. If the Company is unable to procure additional aircraft on acceptable terms or within planned timeframes, the resulting constraints could negatively affect the Company’s ability to meet evolving Customer demands, pursue growth or network expansion opportunities, or replace aircraft planned for retirement, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s competitive position, operating results, and financial condition.
Current report
Introducing a new aircraft manufacturer or fleet type could impose significant operational complexities, regulatory requirements, and costs on the Company.
Current report
•laws and regulations, which may change or which may be inconsistent across various jurisdictions; and
Current report
The Company is expanding its use of AI and machine-learning. Any failure in the Company’s AI implementation strategy, compliance with regulations, or failure to otherwise manage the risks related to AI technologies effectively could materially adversely affect its operations, reputation, and/or financial position.
Current report
The Company has voluntarily set near- and long-term environmental sustainability plans and goals, and any failure or perception of failure to meet or adequately progress against its sustainability plans or goals, which are often aspirational, or any modifications to such goals could adversely affect the Company’s reputation and brand. The Company’s sustainability goals are subject to risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s ability to successfully implement its business strategy, effectively respond to changes in market dynamics, and realize the anticipated benefits and associated cost savings of its actions.
Current report
The achievement of the Company’s plans and goals is materially dependent on the performance of third parties and government action, and these goals could be adversely affected by changes in third-party expectations, methodologies, and priorities, which are rapidly evolving. For example, the Company plans to diversify its sources of jet fuel through increasing the volumes of SAF in its operations. The cost of SAF may be prohibitively expensive without appropriate government support, policies, and incentives (including tax credits). The Company may have binding SAF purchase commitments that extend beyond various incentives currently in place, and the presidential administration may take action to revise, repeal, or otherwise modify existing SAF incentives, which could impact the Company’s operations. The Company may also face pressure from local and state governments as they continue advancing their own, sometimes conflicting, climate-related policies. Heightened competition for alternative fuel sources like SAF may impact the Company’s ability to negotiate contracts with third parties at commercially reasonable and economically favorable terms. The Company’s achievement of its sustainability goals (whether mandated or voluntary) may also depend on technology developments that have not yet occurred or been implemented in a commercially feasible and cost-competitive manner. Failures or delays in sufficient SAF production and delivery, or ceased operations or bankruptcies of the Company’s counterparties, could inhibit the Company’s ability to meet its stated goals. Additionally, to the extent that the Company may seek to achieve its climate goals and obligations through the use of carbon offsets, it may be exposed to increased costs, disclosure requirements, and risks related to third parties associated with the procurement of such offsets.
Current report
The Company’s Bylaws further provide that, as permitted by the TBOC, no shareholder (as defined by the TBOC) may institute or maintain a derivative proceeding unless that shareholder beneficially owns at least three (3) percent of the outstanding shares of the Company.
Removed paragraphs (13)
Previous report
•The Company's business can be significantly impacted by the availability of jet fuel and high and/or volatile fuel prices, and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel.
Previous report
In addition, the Company has had to de-designate certain derivative instruments from their hedging relationships because the derivatives no longer qualify for hedge accounting under applicable accounting standards. The Company continues to be subject to the risk that its fuel derivatives will no longer qualify for hedge accounting under applicable accounting standards, or that the derivative instruments utilized will not effectively offset changes in the price of the jet fuel consumed, which can create additional earnings volatility. Adjustments in the Company's overall fuel hedging strategy, as well as the ability of the commodities used in fuel hedging to qualify for special hedge accounting, could continue to affect the Company's results of operations. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to cost-effectively hedge against increases in fuel prices. Based on the current geopolitical and market dynamics, higher premium costs over time, and aggressive cost reductions underway, the Company does not intend to add new hedging positions to its current hedge book.
Previous report
The Company's low-cost structure can also be negatively impacted by costs over which the Company has limited control. These include costs such as fuel, labor, airport, and regulatory compliance costs. Jet fuel and oil constituted approximately 21.4 percent of the Company's operating expenses during 2024, and the Company's ability to control the cost of fuel is subject to the external factors discussed in “The Company's business can be significantly impacted by the availability of jet fuel and high and/or volatile fuel prices, and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel; therefore, the Company's strategic plans and future profitability are likely to be impacted by the Company's ability to effectively address fuel price increases and fuel price volatility and availability.”
Previous report
•changes in laws that may limit the Company's ability to enter into fuel derivative contracts to hedge against increases in fuel prices;
Previous report
In addition to risks from potential changes to environmental regulation and policy, the transition to lower-carbon technologies could materially adversely affect the Company’s financial results. For example, lower-carbon technologies, such as SAF, are currently not available at scale or priced cost-competitively as compared to conventional jet fuel and may take a significant amount of time to develop and mature, and the cost to transition to them could be prohibitively expensive without appropriate government support, policies, and incentives in place (including tax credits). For additional disclosure related to the risks of SAF, see the Risk Factor entitled, “The Company is subject to risks related to its sustainability goals and disclosures, which may affect stakeholder sentiment and the Company’s reputation and brand.”
Previous report
Finally, the potential acute and chronic physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency, duration, and severity of extreme weather events, longer-term changes in weather patterns, and other climate-related events, could affect the Company’s operations, infrastructure, and financial results. The Company could incur significant costs to improve the climate resiliency of its operations, infrastructure, and supply chain, and otherwise prepare for, respond to, and mitigate such physical effects of climate change. The Company could also incur additional airport fees or other costs related to the infrastructure which supports the commercial aviation industry. The Company is not able to predict accurately the materiality of any potential losses or costs associated with the physical effects of climate change. For additional disclosure related to impacts to the Company’s operations resulting from extreme weather events, see the Risk Factor entitled, “The Company's operations have been, and in the future may again be, materially and adversely disrupted by extreme weather events. An inability to quickly and effectively restore operations following adverse weather, a localized disaster, or disturbance in a key geography has adversely and materially impacted, and in the future could again adversely and materially impact, the Company's business, results of operations, and financial condition.”
Previous report
In addition to responding to legislative and regulatory requirements, the Company has voluntarily set near- and long-term environmental sustainability plans and goals. The achievement of these plans and goals is materially dependent on the performance of third parties and government action, and these goals could be adversely affected by changes in third-party expectations, methodologies, and priorities, which are rapidly changing. The Company expects its path toward achievement of these goals to depend on, among other things (i) increased use of SAF, which is not presently available at scale or at prices competitive to jet fuel; (ii) improved fuel efficiency from fleet modernization; (iii) operational initiatives; and (iv) technological innovation.
Previous report
The Company is attempting to diversify its sources of jet fuel or otherwise seek to limit its reliance on fossil-fuel based fuels, such as through increasing the volumes of SAF used in its operations. Supplies of SAF are limited and may not be developed in sufficient quantities to support the Company’s business or sustainability goals. The cost to transition to SAF could be prohibitively expensive without appropriate government support, policies, and incentives in place (including tax credits). Further, SAF incentives that are currently in place could expire or be repealed, and the Company may have binding SAF purchase commitments that extend beyond various incentives currently in place. Moreover, the new presidential administration may take action to revise, repeal, or otherwise modify existing SAF incentives, including tax credits and federal loans and grants. For example, on January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order pausing certain funding disbursements under the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022; the impact of this Executive Order on the use of and investment in SAF, current and future SAF projects, and, ultimately, the Company's operations is uncertain at this time. Additionally, SAF purchase agreements may pertain to production from facilities that are planned but not yet operational, and which may utilize technology that has not been proven at commercial scale. There is no assurance that these facilities will produce SAF at commercial scale or that they will meet contracted production timelines and volumes. SAF has a limited distribution system and is subject to higher transportation risks than jet fuel. In the event SAF is not delivered on schedule or in sufficient volumes, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to source a supply of SAF sufficient to meet its stated goals, or that it will be able to do so on favorable economic terms. It could become increasingly difficult to negotiate SAF purchase agreements with suppliers at commercially reasonable terms due to high demand and insufficient supply of SAF, particularly as more businesses publicly announce environmental sustainability goals or if SAF incentives expire, are repealed, or are otherwise negatively impacted by governmental action or inaction. Moreover, there is no guarantee that Customers, regulators, or other stakeholders will not object to any use of “book and claim” accounting methods (or similar constructs) for claims of GHG emission reductions in connection with the Company’s SAF purchase agreements, as such claims may be based on the separation of potential GHG emission reductions from the physical delivery of SAF. The Company cannot guarantee that it will be able to purchase SAF on a cost-effective basis, and in addition to the factors already discussed, the ability to leverage SAF as part of its sustainability efforts could also be adversely affected by any of the following: technology challenges in the production, development, transport…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous report
Furthermore, to the extent that the Company may seek to achieve its voluntary climate goals and/or mandatory climate obligations through the use of carbon offsets, it may be exposed to additional costs associated with the procurement of offsets or limited supply in the carbon offsets market. In addition, to the extent the Company does utilize offsets, it may need to disclose information about such offsets through regulatory mandates and it will need to obtain these offsets from third parties. While the Company generally seeks to purchase only quality offsets verified by reputable third parties, it can make no guarantees that the underlying offset project will provide the full or any claimed GHG emission reduction benefits, nor can it guarantee that any such offsets will not be subject to criticism from Customers, regulators, or other stakeholders. As more businesses have publicly announced environmental sustainability goals, the cost of carbon offsets has also increased and may continue to increase significantly.
Previous report
The Company’s ability to achieve its environmental sustainability goals is subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of its control. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: the Company’s ability to successfully implement its business strategy, effectively respond to changes in market dynamics, and achieve the anticipated benefits and associated cost savings of such strategies and actions; the Company’s ability to implement its fleet modernization or planned fuel efficiency initiatives; availability and ability to utilize SAF at economical prices and with expected carbon intensity reductions; advancement in modernizing air traffic control systems; unforeseen production, design, operational, and technological difficulties; the outcome of research efforts and future technology developments, including the ability to scale projects and technologies on a commercially competitive basis; compliance with, and changes or additions to, global and regional regulations, taxes, charges, mandates, or requirements relating to GHG emissions, carbon costs, or climate-related goals; changes to emission accounting methodologies; adapting products to customer preferences and customer acceptance of sustainable supply chain solutions; the actions of competitors and competitive pressures; or other new developments related to the potential impacts of climate change. There is no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully execute its strategies and achieve its previously announced environmental and sustainability goals and plans.
Previous report
The Company also makes certain disclosures regarding sustainability, including the Company’s sustainability goals and plans to address carbon emissions, and many of these disclosures are necessarily based on (i) estimates and assumptions that are inherently difficult to assess and may involve third-party data that the Company does not independently verify, and (ii) timelines that are longer than the timelines associated with the Company’s required disclosures. Given the estimates, assumptions, and timelines used to create these disclosures, the materiality of these disclosures is inherently difficult to assess in advance, and given the uncertainty of the estimates and assumptions used to create these disclosures, the Company may not be able to anticipate in advance whether or the degree to which it will or will not be able to meet its sustainability plans or goals, or how expensive it will be to do so.
Previous report
While the new presidential administration is not expected to pursue federal efforts to significantly increase sustainability-related regulatory requirements or require the disclosure of certain climate-related information, the Company may still face pressure from local and state governments as they continue advancing their own climate-related policies, as well as voluntary pressure from Customers, stakeholders, and financial institutions. The Company’s reputation or brand, as well as its Customer and other stakeholder relationships, could be adversely impacted as a result of, among other things, (i) any failure to meet or maintain its sustainability plans or goals, including those related to climate change; (ii) the Company’s impact on the environment; or (iii) public pressure from investors or policy groups to change the Company's policies. In the future, the Company's efforts to meet its sustainability plans or goals or to comply with sustainability-related regulations may divert Company resources or management's attention from other matters.
Reworded paragraphs (57)
Previous wording
The Company’s operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described below. Other risks are described in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto. The Company's business could also be affected by additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial. If any of these risks actually occur, it could materially harm the Company's business, financial condition, or results of operations, or impair the Company's ability to implement its strategic plans. In that case, the market price of the Company's common stock could decline. The following risk factors are summarized as financial; operational; information technology; and legal, regulatory, compliance, and reputational.
Current wording
The Company’s operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to those described below. Other risks are described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto. The Company’s business could also be affected by additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial. If any of these risks actually occurs, it could materially harm the Company’s business, financial condition, or results of operations, or impair the Company’s ability to implement its strategic plans. In that case, the market price of the Company’s common stock could decline. The following risk factors are summarized as financial; operational; information technology, cybersecurity, and data privacy; and legal, regulatory, compliance, and reputational.
Previous wording
•The airline industry is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, and continued or future unfavorable economic conditions could negatively affect the Company’s results of operations and require the Company to adjust its business strategies.
Current wording
•The airline industry is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, and continued or future unfavorable economic conditions or economic uncertainty could negatively affect the Company’s results of operations and require the Company to adjust its business strategies.
Previous wording
The Company's low-cost structure has historically been one of its primary competitive advantages, and many factors have adversely affected and could continue to adversely affect the Company's ability to control its costs.
Current wording
•The Company’s low-cost structure has historically been a competitive advantage, and many factors have and could continue to adversely affect the Company’s ability to control its costs.
Previous wording
•The Company's results of operations could be adversely impacted if it is unable to effectively execute its strategic plans.
Current wording
•The Company’s business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely impacted if it is unable to effectively execute its strategic plans.
Previous wording
The Company is currently dependent on Boeing as the sole manufacturer of the Company's aircraft. If the MAX aircraft were to become unavailable for the Company's operations, or if the Company were to continue to experience prolonged delivery delays of MAX aircraft, the Company's business plans, strategies, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Current wording
•The Company is currently dependent on Boeing as the sole manufacturer of the Company’s aircraft. If the MAX aircraft were to become unavailable for the Company’s operations, or if the Company were not able to procure future aircraft in a timely manner or on favorable commercial terms, the Company’s business plans, strategies, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Previous wording
•The Company's business is labor intensive, with most Employees represented by labor unions; therefore, the Company could be materially adversely affected in the event of conflict with its Employees or its Employees' representatives or if the Company were unable to employ and retain appropriate numbers of qualified Employees to maintain its operations.
Current wording
•The Company could be materially adversely affected in the event of conflict with its Employees or its Employees’ representatives or if the Company were unable to employ and retain appropriate numbers of qualified Employees to maintain its operations.
Previous wording
•The Company is currently dependent on a single engine supplier, as well as single suppliers of certain other aircraft parts and equipment; therefore, the Company could be materially adversely affected (i) if it were unable to obtain timely or sufficient delivery of aircraft parts or equipment or adequate maintenance or other support from any of these suppliers at commercially reasonable terms, (ii) if suppliers were unable to achieve and/or maintain required regulatory certifications or approvals of their parts or equipment, or (iii) in the event of a mechanical or regulatory issue associated with the Company's aircraft parts or equipment.
Current wording
•The Company is currently dependent on a single engine supplier, as well as single suppliers of certain other aircraft parts and equipment; therefore, the Company could be materially adversely affected (i) if it were unable to obtain timely or sufficient delivery of aircraft parts or equipment or adequate maintenance or other support, (ii) if suppliers were unable to achieve and/or maintain required regulatory certifications or approvals, or (iii) in the event of a mechanical or regulatory issue associated with the Company’s aircraft parts or equipment.
Previous wording
The airline industry has faced on-going security concerns and related cost burdens; further threatened or actual terrorist attacks, war, or other hostilities, even if not made directly on the airline industry, could significantly harm the airline industry and the Company's operations.
Current wording
•The airline industry has faced on-going security concerns and related cost burdens; further threatened or actual terrorist attacks, war, or other hostilities could significantly harm the airline industry and the Company’s operations.
Previous wording
The Company is heavily dependent on technology to operate its business and continues to implement substantial changes to its information systems; any failure, disruption, breach, or delay in the Company’s information systems or in implementation of necessary changes could materially adversely affect its operations.
Current wording
•The Company is heavily dependent on technology to operate its business; any failure, disruption, breach, or delay in the Company’s information systems or in implementation of necessary changes could materially adversely affect its operations.
Previous wording
The Company is increasingly exposed to cybersecurity attacks and data incidents impacting its IT Systems, or those of the Company’s vendors or service providers. Such cybersecurity incidents or data incidents could have a disruptive and material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, or results of operations.
Current wording
•The Company is increasingly exposed to cybersecurity attacks and data incidents impacting its IT Systems, and such incidents could have a disruptive and material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position, or results of operations.
Previous wording
The Company is subject to extensive government regulation that may disrupt or necessitate modifications to the Company’s operations, business plans, and strategies, increase the Company’s operating costs, or otherwise limit the Company’s ability to conduct business.
Current wording
•The Company is subject to extensive government regulation that may disrupt or necessitate modifications to the Company’s operations, business plans, and strategies, or increase the Company’s operating costs.
Previous wording
The Company is subject to various environmental requirements and risks, including increased regulation, changing consumer preferences, physical, environmental, and climate risks, and risks associated with climate change; the cost of compliance with more stringent environmental regulations, failure to comply with environmental regulations, or failure to otherwise manage the risks of climate change effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
Current wording
•The Company is subject to various environmental requirements and risks; the cost of compliance with more stringent environmental regulations, failure to comply with environmental regulations, or failure to otherwise manage the risks of climate change effectively could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
Previous wording
•The Company's future results will suffer if it is unable to effectively manage its international operations and/or Extended Operations.
Current wording
•The Company’s future results may suffer if it is unable to effectively manage its current and contemplated international operations or Extended Operations.
Previous wording
The Company is currently subject to regulatory actions and pending litigation, and if judgment, penalties, or fines were to be rendered against the Company, such judgment, penalties, or fines could adversely affect the Company's operating results.
Current wording
•The Company is currently subject to regulatory actions and pending litigation, and judgment, penalties, or fines rendered against the Company could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.
Previous wording
•The Company’s reputation and brand could be harmed if it were to experience significant negative publicity through social media or otherwise, including with respect to the Company's voluntary or mandatory ESG-related goals and disclosures.
Current wording
•The Company’s reputation and brand could be harmed if it were to experience significant negative publicity through social media or otherwise.
Previous wording
The airline industry, which is subject to relatively high fixed costs and highly variable and unpredictable demand, is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, including changes in consumer discretionary spending as a result of inflation, rising interest rates, or other factors. Historically, unfavorable U.S. economic conditions have driven changes in travel patterns and have resulted in reduced spending for both leisure and business travel. For some consumers, leisure travel is a discretionary expense, and short-haul travelers, in particular, have the option toreplace air travel with surface travel.
Current wording
The airline industry, which is subject to relatively high fixed costs and highly variable and unpredictable demand, is particularly sensitive to changes in economic conditions, including changes in consumer discretionary spending as a result of inflation, rising interest rates, or other factors. Historically, unfavorable U.S. economic conditions have driven changes in travel patterns and have resulted in reduced spending for both leisure and business travel. For some consumers, leisure travel is a discretionary expense, and short-haul travelers, in particular, have the option to replace air travel with surface travel.
Previous wording
Businesses and other travelers are able to forego air travel by using other communications such as videoconferencing, business communication platforms, and the Internet. Further, some businesses have continued to allow their employees to work remotely following the COVID-19 pandemic and/or have restricted non-essential travel for their employees, which has kept demand for business air travel below pre-pandemic levels. In addition, to the extent business travel recovers to pre-pandemic levels, businesses may require the purchase of less expensive tickets to reduce costs. This, in turn, can result in a decrease in average revenue per seat.
Current wording
Businesses and other travelers are able to forego air travel by using other communications such as videoconferencing, business communication platforms, and the Internet. Further, some businesses allow their employees to work remotely and/or restrict non-essential travel for their employees, which has impacted the demand for business air travel. In addition, to the extent business travel demand increases, businesses may require the purchase of less expensive tickets to reduce costs. This, in turn, can result in a decrease in average revenue per seat.
Previous wording
During unfavorable economic conditions, low fares are often used to stimulate traffic. However, offering low fares typically hampers the ability of airlines to counteract any increases in fuel, labor, and other costs. Consumer behavior related to traveling may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in the perceived or actual economic climate, including declines in income levels or disposable income, and/or loss of wealth resulting from the impact of economic conditions. Any continuing or future U.S. or global economic uncertainty could further negatively affect the Company's results of operations and could cause the Company to further adjust its business strategies. Additionally, because a significant portion of expenses to operate a flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers carried, a relatively small change in the number of passengers can have a disproportionate effect on an airline’s operating and financial results. Therefore, any general reduction in airline passenger traffic could adversely affect the Company's results of operations.
Current wording
During unfavorable economic conditions, low fares are often used to stimulate traffic. However, offering low fares typically hampers the ability of airlines to counteract any increases in fuel, labor, and other costs. Consumer behavior related to traveling may be negatively impacted by adverse changes in the perceived or actual economic climate, including declines in income levels or disposable income, and/or loss of wealth resulting from the impact of economic conditions. Government foreign-relations actions, including tariffs and immigration policies, may also reduce the willingness of non-U.S. persons to travel to or within the United States, including by air. Any continuing or future U.S. or global economic uncertainty could further negatively affect the Company’s results of operations and could cause the Company to further adjust its business strategies. Additionally, because a significant portion of expenses to operate a flight do not vary significantly with the number of passengers carried, a relatively small change in the number of passengers can have a disproportionate effect on an airline’s operating and financial results. Therefore, any general reduction in airline passenger traffic could adversely affect the Company’s results of operations.
Previous wording
The Company's business can be significantly impacted by the availability of jet fuel and high and/or volatile fuel prices, and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel; therefore, the Company's strategic plans and future profitability are likely to be impacted by the Company's ability to effectively address fuel price increases and fuel price volatility and availability.
Current wording
The Company's business can be significantly affected by the availability of jet fuel, fuel prices, and volatility of fuel prices and the Company's operations are subject to disruption in the event of any delayed supply of fuel; therefore, the Company's strategic plans and future profitability are likely to be affected by fuel availability, price increases, and fuel price volatility.
Previous wording
Airlines are inherently dependent upon energy to operate, and jet fuel and oil represented approximately 21.4 percent of the Company's operating expenses for 2024. As discussed under "Business - Cost Structure," although market jet fuel prices were volatile throughout the year, Fuel and oil expense for 2024 remained high, primarily due to an increase in fuel gallons consumed. Even a small change in market fuel prices can significantly affect profitability. Furthermore, the cost of fuel can be extremely volatile and unpredictable and subject to many external factors that are beyond the Company's control. For example, fuel prices can be impacted by political, environmental (including those related to climate change), and economic factors, such as (i) dependency on foreign imports of crude oil and the potential for hostilities or other conflicts in oil producing areas; (ii) limitations and/or disruptions in domestic refining or pipeline operations or capacity due to weather, natural disasters, or other factors; (iii) worldwide demand for fuel, particularly in developing countries, which can result in inflated energy prices; (iv) changes in U.S. governmental policies on fuel production, transportation, taxes, and marketing; and (v) changes in currency exchange rates. In addition, the occurrence of extreme weather events (regardless of cause), such as flooding, acute or prolonged winter storms, tropical storms, and hurricanes, can also disrupt the jet fuel supply chain and affect fuel prices.
Current wording
Airlines are inherently dependent upon energy to operate, and jet fuel and oil represented approximately 19 percent of the Company's operating expenses for 2025. Even a small change in market fuel prices can significantly affect profitability. The cost of fuel can be extremely volatile and unpredictable and is subject to many external factors and market expectations that are beyond the Company’s control. For example, fuel prices can be impacted by geopolitical, environmental (including those related to climate change), and economic factors, such as (i) dependency on foreign imports of crude oil and potential or actual hostilities or other conflicts in oil producing areas or along global trade routes; (ii) limitations and/or disruptions in domestic refining or pipeline operations or capacity due to weather, natural disasters, or other factors; (iii) worldwide demand for fuel, particularly in developing countries, which can result in inflated energy prices; (iv) changes in U.S. governmental policies on fuel production, transportation, taxes, and marketing; (v) imposition of economic sanctions on oil-producing countries or specific industry participants; and (vi) changes in currency exchange rates.
Previous wording
The Company is also reliant upon the readily available supply and timely delivery of jet fuel to the airports that it serves. A disruption in that supply could present significant challenges to the Company's operations and could ultimately cause the cancellation of flights and/or hinder the Company’s ability to provide service to a particular airport. For additional discussion of the availability of jet fuel and SAF, please see “The Company is subject to risks related to its voluntary sustainability goals and disclosures, which may affect stakeholder sentiment and the Company’s reputation and brand.”
Current wording
The Company is also reliant upon the readily available supply and timely delivery of jet fuel to the airports that it serves. A disruption in refinery production or related service and transportation operations affecting supply could present significant challenges to the Company’s operations and could ultimately cause the cancellation of flights and/or hinder the Company’s ability to provide service to a particular airport. In addition, the occurrence of extreme weather events (regardless of cause), such as flooding, acute or prolonged winter storms, tropical storms, and hurricanes, can also disrupt the jet fuel supply chain and affect fuel prices.
Previous wording
The Company's ability to mitigate the impact of fuel price increases could also be limited by factors such as its historical low-fare reputation, the portion of its Customer base that purchases travel for leisure purposes, the competitive nature of the airline industry generally, and the risk that higher fares will drive a decrease in demand. The Company has historically attempted to manage its risk associated with volatile jet fuel prices by utilizing over-the-counter fuel derivative instruments to hedge a portion of its future jet fuel purchases. However, energy prices can fluctuate significantly in a relatively short amount of time. Because the Company uses a variety of different derivative instruments at different price points, the Company is subject to the risk that the fuel derivatives it uses will not provide adequate protection against significant increases in fuel prices. In some cases, these derivative instruments could result in hedging losses, which could result in the Company effectively paying higher than market prices for fuel, thus creating additional volatility in the Company's earnings.
Current wording
Historically, the Company attempted to manage its risk associated with volatile jet fuel prices by utilizing over-the-counter fuel derivative instruments to hedge a portion of its future jet fuel purchases. However, based on higher fuel hedging premium costs over time and other factors, the Company terminated its remaining fuel hedge positions in second quarter 2025 and does not intend to add new fuel derivatives to its portfolio. The Company may review its approach to hedging from time to time based on market conditions and other factors. Purchasing jet fuel at prevailing market prices, which could change substantially over short periods of time, may make the Company’s earnings more vulnerable to volatile fuel prices and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. If the Company were to resume its fuel hedging program in the future, it cannot guarantee that the fuel derivatives it uses will provide adequate protection against significant increases in fuel prices. In certain cases, the type of derivative instruments utilized could result in hedging losses, which could result in the Company effectively paying higher than market prices for fuel, thus creating additional volatility in the Company’s earnings. The Company’s ability to enter into fuel derivative instruments in the future could also be limited by market conditions.
Previous wording
The Company's fuel hedging arrangements and the various potential impacts of hedge accounting on the Company's financial position, cash flows, and results of operations are discussed in more detail under "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk," and in Note 1 and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Current wording
The Company’s prior period fuel hedging arrangements and the various potential impacts of hedge accounting on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, and results of operations are discussed in more detail under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” and in Note 1 and Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Previous wording
The Company's low-cost structure has been one of its primary competitive advantages, as it has generally enabled the Company to offer low fares, drive traffic volume, grow market share, and protect profits. As discussed below under "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," the Company has experienced significant inflationary cost pressure, particularly with respect to Salaries, wages, and benefits expense.
Current wording
The Company’s low-cost structure has been one of its primary competitive advantages, as it has generally enabled the Company to offer low fares, drive traffic volume, grow market share, and protect profits. As discussed below under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” the Company has experienced significant inflationary cost pressure, particularly with respect to Salaries, wages, and benefits expense. The Company’s low-cost structure can also be negatively impacted by costs over which the Company has limited control. These include costs such as fuel, labor (especially union labor), airport, and regulatory compliance costs.
Previous wording
Salaries, wages, and benefits constituted approximately 45.1 percent of the Company's operating expenses during 2024. The Company's ability to control labor costs is limited by the terms of its collective-bargaining agreements. This limited control has negatively impacted the Company's low-cost structure and position. As discussed further under "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," the Company's unionized workforce makes up approximately 82 percent of its Employees and many have had pay scale increases as a result of contractual rate increases, which has put pressure on the Company's labor costs. Further, in response to staffing challenges, the Company has increased the minimum pay for certain of its workforce and provided incentive pay in certain instances.
Current wording
The Company’s ability to control labor costs is limited by the terms of its collective-bargaining agreements. These agreements include required work rules and wage‑rate provisions, as well as other negotiated terms, that may restrict the Company’s operational flexibility and result in increased staffing or scheduling inefficiencies, thereby pressuring its cost structure relative to certain competitors. The Company’s unionized workforce makes up approximately 84 percent of its Employees and many have had pay scale increases as a result of contractual rate increases, which has increased the Company’s labor costs. Further, in response to staffing challenges, the Company has increased the minimum pay for certain of its workforce and provided incentive pay in certain instances. If new or amended labor agreements include additional pay increases, work rule requirements, or other terms that further elevate costs, the Company’s competitive cost position could be adversely affected.
Previous wording
The Company is reliant upon third-party vendors and service providers, and the Company's low-cost advantage is dependent in part on its ability to obtain and maintain commercially reasonable terms with those parties. Disruptions to capital markets, shortages of skilled personnel, supply chain disruptions, increased regulation, geopolitical developments, and/or adverse economic conditions could subject certain of the Company's third-party vendors and service providers to significant financial pressures, which could lead to delays and other performance issues, ceased operations, or even bankruptcies among these third-party vendors and service providers. If a third-party vendor or service provider is unable to fulfill its commitments to the Company, the Company may be unable to replace that third-party vendor or service provider in a short period of time, or at competitive terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's results of operations.
Current wording
The Company is reliant upon third-party vendors and service providers, and the Company’s competitive position is dependent in part on its ability to obtain and maintain commercially reasonable terms with those parties. Disruptions to capital markets, shortages of skilled personnel, supply chain disruptions, increased regulation, geopolitical developments, tariffs, and/or adverse economic conditions could subject certain of the Company’s third-party vendors and service providers to significant financial pressures, which could lead to delays and other performance issues, ceased operations, or even bankruptcies among these third-party vendors and service providers. If a third-party vendor or service provider is unable to fulfill its commitments to the Company, the Company may be unable to replace that third-party vendor or service provider in a short period of time, or at competitive terms, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.
Previous wording
As discussed under "Business - Insurance," the Company carries insurance of types customary in the airline industry. Although the Company has been able to purchase aviation, property, liability, pollution, cybersecurity, and D&O/fiduciary insurance via the commercial insurance marketplace, costs have generally increased, and it is more difficult and, in some cases not possible, to obtain insurance for certain activities and weather-related events. For instance, the cost of insurance premiums related to hail and wind damage has increased for certain facilities, and certain flood insurance is no longer available. Available commercial insurance could be more expensive in the future and/or have material differences in coverage than insurance that has historically been provided and may not be adequate to protect against the Company's risk of loss from future events, including acts of terrorism and severe weather events. With respect to any insurance claims, policy coverages and claims are subject to acceptance by the many insurers involved and may require arbitration, mediation, and/or litigation to effectively settle the claims over prolonged periods of time. In addition, an aircraft accident or other incident involving Southwest could result in costs in excess of its related insurance coverage, which costs could be substantial. Any aircraft accident or other incident involving Southwest, even if fully insured, could also have a material adverse effect on the public's perception of the Company, which could harm its reputation and business.
Current wording
As discussed under “Business - Insurance,” the Company carries insurance of types customary in the airline industry. Although the Company has been able to purchase aviation, property, liability, pollution, cybersecurity, and D&O/fiduciary insurance via the commercial insurance marketplace, costs have generally increased, and it is more difficult and, in some cases not possible, to obtain insurance for certain activities and weather-related events. For instance, the cost of insurance premiums related to hail and wind damage has increased for certain facilities, and certain flood insurance is no longer available. Available commercial insurance could be more expensive in the future and/or have material differences in coverage than insurance that has historically been provided and may not be adequate to protect against the Company’s risk of loss from future events, including acts of terrorism and severe weather events. With respect to any insurance claims, policy coverages and claims are subject to acceptance by the many insurers involved and may require arbitration, mediation, and/or litigation to effectively settle the claims over prolonged periods of time. The Company’s wholly-owned insurance captive uses actuarial services to determine the value of policies and reserves, which can be subject to fluctuation as past trends are not always indicative of future loss developments. In addition, an aircraft accident or other incident involving Southwest could result in costs in excess of its related insurance coverage, which costs could be substantial. Any aircraft accident or other incident involving Southwest or Southwest’s strategic partners, even if fully insured, could also have a material adverse effect on the public’s perception of the Company, which could harm its reputation and business.
Previous wording
The Company's results of operations could be adversely impacted if it is unable to effectively execute its strategic plans.
Current wording
The Company’s business, operating results, and financial condition could be adversely impacted if it is unable to effectively execute its strategic plans.
Previous wording
The Company is reliant on the success of its strategic plans and initiatives to increase revenues and help offset increasing costs. The execution of the Company's strategic plans was significantly negatively affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the Company has taken actions to address staffing and increase the starting wage rate for certain workgroups, manage its fleet and fleet order book, and better optimize its network. The Company has also announced plans for certain transformational initiatives, such as changing to an assigned seating model, offering premium seating with extra legroom, formalizing partnerships with international carriers to expand its network, offering Getaways by Southwest, introducing 24-hour operations, and reducing the turn times between flights. The Company’s transformational initiatives are discussed in more detail under “Business.” The timely and effective execution of the Company's strategies is dependent upon, among other factors, (i) the Company's ability to balance its network schedule and capacity with the availability and location of its crew resources; (ii) the Company's ability to effectively balance its investment of incremental operating expenses and capital expenditures related to its strategies against the need to effectively control costs; (iii) the Company's ability to timely and effectively implement, transition, and maintain related information technology systems and infrastructure; (iv) the Company’s ability to maintain satisfactory relations with its Employees or its Employees’ representatives; (v) the Company’s ability to broaden its Customer base; and (vi) the Company's dependence on third parties with respect to the execution of its strategic plans. The Company’s commercial and operational initiatives are designed to meet evolving Customer preferences, increase revenue opportunities, mitigate cost pressures, and modernize processes. However, the Company cannot offer any assurances that these measures or any future initiatives will be successful in increasing revenues or offsetting costs. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives may create logistical challenges that could harm the operational performance of the airline or result in decreased demand for air travel on Southwest. If the Company does not successfully execute its transformational initiatives or other strategic plans, or if actual results vary significantly from its expectations, the Company’s business, operating results, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Current wording
The Company is reliant on the success of its strategic plans and initiatives to increase revenues and help offset increasing costs. The execution of the Company’s strategic plans have been and may again be negatively affected by macroeconomic conditions. In both 2024 and 2025, the Company announced plans for, and is in the process of implementing, certain transformational initiatives, such as changing to an assigned seating model, offering extra legroom seating, formalizing partnerships with international carriers to expand its network, offering Getaways by Southwest, introducing 24-hour operations, reducing the turn times between flights, and introducing bag fees for most fare products. The Company’s transformational initiatives are discussed in more detail under “Business.” The Company made certain assumptions in developing its strategic plans and initiatives related to, for example, customer demand (in light of changing economic conditions), fuel costs, delivery of aircraft, aircraft certification approval timelines, labor market constraints and related costs, supply chain constraints, inflationary pressures, voluntary or mandatory groundings of aircraft, its network, competition, market consolidation, and other macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. The timely and effective execution of the Company’s strategies is dependent upon, among other factors, (i) the Company’s ability to balance its network schedule and capacity with the availability and location of its crew resources; (ii) the Company’s ability to effectively balance its investment of incremental operating expenses and capital expenditures related to its strategies against the need to effectively control costs; (iii) the Company’s ability to timely and effectively implement, transition, and maintain related information technology systems and infrastructure; (iv) the Company’s ability to secure labor agreements or modifications necessary to support certain operational or strategic initiatives; (v) the Company’s ability to maintain satisfactory relations with its Employees or its Employees’ representatives; (vi) the Company’s ability to retain and broaden its Customer base; and (vii) the Company’s dependence on third parties with respect to the execution of its strategic plans. The Company’s commercial and operational initiatives are designed to meet evolving Customer preferences, increase revenue opportunities, mitigate cost pressures, and modernize processes. Nevertheless, these measures and any future initiatives may hurt the Company’s competitive position and Customer loyalty rather than improve it and may not be successful in increasing revenues or offsetting costs. Furthermore, the execution of the Company’s strategic plans may exacerbate other risks described in this Form 10-K. Actual conditions may be different from the Company’s assumptions at any time and could cause the Company to further adjust its strategic plan. Additionally, the implementation of these initiatives may c…
Excerpt shortened here; the source contains the full paragraph.
Previous wording
The Company's low-cost position has been challenged by the removal of fare floors for certain routes by other carriers, leading to a lower fare offering across the industry, as well as “unbundled” service offerings by some carriers, which appeal to price-sensitive travelers through promotion to consumers of relatively low base fare options. Additionally, most major U.S. airlines offer expanded cabin segmentation fare products, such as "basic economy," "premium economy," and "first class" products. The Company plans to move to an assigned seating model and will offer a premium economy fare product with extra legroom to meet Customer preferences and better compete with the major U.S. airlines. If the Company cannot adequately retain and attract Customers or differentiate its product offerings from those of its competitors, then its business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Current wording
The Company’s historical low-fare position has been challenged by the removal of fare floors for certain routes by other carriers, leading to a lower fare offering across the industry, as well as “unbundled” service offerings by some carriers, which appeal to price-sensitive travelers through promotion to consumers of relatively low base fare options. Additionally, most major U.S. airlines offer expanded cabin segmentation fare products, such as “basic economy,” “premium economy,” and “first class” products. To meet Customer preferences and better compete with the major U.S. airlines, the Company has moved to a more segmented approach, offering a basic economy product and a premium economy fare product with extra legroom. The Company has also moved to an assigned seating model and now charges bag fees for most fare products. The competitiveness of the Company’s offerings could be adversely affected if it is unable to implement new initiatives in a timely and successful manner or if Customers are unwilling to accept the Company’s product and policy changes. If the Company cannot adequately retain and attract Customers or differentiate its product offerings from those of its competitors, then its business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Previous wording
The Company's revenues are sensitive to the actions of other carriers with respect to pricing, routes, loyalty programs, scheduling, capacity, customer service, operational reliability, comfort and amenities, product offerings, cost structure, aircraft fleet, strategic alliances, and code-sharing and similar activities. Many of the Company’s competitors participate in joint ventures and international alliances, providing for increased financial resources and improved profit margins. Many major U.S. airlines also offer longer-haul, international routes through extensive global networks. In order to compete with these activities and expand its transatlantic and transpacific service offerings, the Company began to enter into international partnerships in 2025. Failure to successfully implement and manage international partnerships could result in financial losses and reputational harm. The airline industry may also be impacted by mergers, acquisitions, heightened financial pressures, or bankruptcies. Further consolidation in the airline industry generally could result in the reduction of fares by other airlines, which could in turn affect the Company’s profitability in existing and new markets. If the Company cannot maintain its costs at a competitive level, then its business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Current wording
The Company’s revenues are sensitive to the actions of other carriers with respect to pricing, routes, loyalty programs, scheduling, capacity, customer service, operational reliability, comfort and amenities, product offerings, cost structure, aircraft fleet, strategic alliances, and code-sharing and similar activities. Many of the Company’s competitors participate in joint ventures and international alliances, providing for increased financial resources and improved profit margins. Many major U.S. airlines also offer longer-haul, international routes through extensive global networks. In order to compete with these activities and expand its transatlantic and transpacific service offerings, the Company began to enter into international partnerships in 2025. Failure to successfully implement and manage international partnerships could result in financial losses and reputational harm. The airline industry also has been and may again be impacted by bankruptcies, mergers, acquisitions, or heightened financial pressures. Further consolidation in the airline industry generally could result in the reduction of fares by other airlines, which could in turn affect the Company’s profitability in existing and new markets. If the Company cannot compete with other airlines’ offerings or maintain its costs at a competitive level, then its business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Previous wording
The Boeing MAX aircraft are crucial to the Company’s ability to operate and grow its business and fleet modernization initiatives. The Company operates the -8 out of the MAX family of aircraft and is awaiting delivery of the -7 out of the MAX family of aircraft. Deliveries of MAX aircraft from Boeing to the Company are subject to Boeing's production schedules and volumes. Boeing has in the past, and may continue to, experience delays in fulfilling its commitments with regards to delivery of the -8 to the Company as a result of manufacturing challenges. In January 2024, the FAA announced that it had informed Boeing that the FAA would not (i) agree to any request from Boeing for an expansion in production or (ii) approve additional production lines for the MAX aircraft until the FAA is satisfied that any applicable Boeing quality control issues are resolved. Further, the Company's contractual delivery schedule for the -7 is dependent on the FAA issuing required certifications and approvals to Boeing and the Company. In January 2024, Boeing announced plans to withdraw an exemption request with the FAA and incorporate an engineering solution as part of the -7 certification process. The FAA will ultimately determine the timing of the -7 certification and entry into service, and the Company therefore offers no assurances that current estimations and timelines are correct.
Current wording
The Boeing MAX aircraft are crucial to the Company’s ability to operate and grow its business and fleet modernization initiatives. The Company operates the -8 out of the MAX family of aircraft and is awaiting delivery of the -7 out of the MAX family of aircraft. Deliveries of MAX aircraft from Boeing to the Company are subject to Boeing’s production schedules and volumes. Boeing has in the past, and may continue to, experience delays in fulfilling its commitments with regards to delivery of the -8 to the Company as a result of manufacturing challenges. Further, the Company’s contractual delivery schedule for the -7 is dependent on the FAA issuing required certifications and approvals to Boeing and the Company. The FAA will ultimately determine the timing of the -7 certification and entry into service, and the Company therefore offers no assurances that current estimations and timelines are correct.
Previous wording
The Company currently operates a higher percentage of the Boeing 737 aircraft than other air carriers in the industry, and therefore may encounter novel hazards, age-related maintenance issues, or airworthiness issues associated with 737 aircraft to a larger degree than other carriers. Boeing no longer manufactures versions of the 737 other than the MAX family of aircraft. If the MAX aircraft were to become unavailable for the Company’s flight operations, the Company's operations would be materially adversely affected. Further, if the -7 certification is not completed in a timely manner, the Company’s growth and network plans could be restricted unless and until it could procure and operate other types of aircraft from Boeing or another manufacturer, seller, or lessor. If the Company’s operations or growth were to be dependent upon the introduction of a new aircraft make and model to the Company’s fleet, the Company would need to, among other things, (i) develop and implement new maintenance, operating, and training programs; (ii) secure extensive regulatory approvals; and (iii) implement new technologies. The requirements associated with operating a new aircraft make and model could take an extended period of time to fulfill and would likely impose substantial costs on the Company. A shift away from a single fleet type could also add complexity to the Company’s operations, present operational and compliance risks, and materially increase the Company's costs. Any of these events would have a material, adverse effect on the Company's business, operating results, and financial condition. The Company could also be materially adversely affected if the pricing or operational attributes of its aircraft were to become less competitive.
Current wording
If the Company’s operations, growth, or strategic initiatives were to be dependent upon the introduction of a new aircraft make and model to the Company’s fleet, the Company would need to, among other things, (i) develop and implement new maintenance, operating, and training programs; (ii) procure new simulators, tooling, spares, and facilities; (iii) secure extensive regulatory approvals; (iv) implement new technologies; (v) negotiate new supplier, parts-support, and maintenance arrangements; and (vi) negotiate pay and work rules with certain labor unions. The requirements associated with operating a new aircraft make and model could take an extended period of time to fulfill and would likely impose substantial costs on the Company. A shift away from a single fleet type could also add complexity to the Company’s operations, present operational and compliance risks, and materially increase the Company’s costs. Any of these events would have a material, adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results, and financial condition. The Company could also be materially adversely affected if the pricing or operational attributes of its aircraft were to become less competitive.
Previous wording
The airline business is labor intensive, and for the year ended December 31, 2024, Salaries, wages, and benefits expense represented approximately 45.1 percent of the Company's operating expenses. As of December 31, 2024, approximately 82 percent of the Company's Employees were represented for collective bargaining purposes by labor unions, making the Company particularly exposed in the event of labor-related job actions. Employment-related matters (some of which relate to negotiated items) that have impacted the Company's results of operations include hiring/retention rates, attendance, pay rates, outsourcing, work rules, health care costs, and retirement benefits. Although the Company has reached final labor agreements with its twelve unionized Employee groups, the next of which becomes amendable in October 2026, general wage inflation has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in pressure on the Company's low-cost structure. The Company’s results could be materially adversely affected in the event of conflicts with its Employees or its Employees’ representatives.
Current wording
The airline business is labor intensive, and for the year ended December 31, 2025, Salaries, wages, and benefits expense represented approximately 47 percent of the Company's operating expenses. As of December 31, 2025, approximately 84 percent of the Company’s Employees were represented for collective-bargaining purposes by labor unions, making the Company particularly exposed in the event of labor-related job actions. Employment-related matters (some of which relate to negotiated items) that have impacted the Company’s results of operations include hiring/retention rates, attendance, pay rates, outsourcing, work rules, health care costs, and retirement benefits. Although the Company has reached final labor agreements with its twelve unionized Employee groups, the next of which becomes amendable in October 2026, general wage inflation has resulted, and is expected to continue to result, in pressure on the Company’s low-cost structure. Renegotiating labor agreements or entering into new labor agreements can require significant costs and extensive bargaining and, in some instances, may not be successful. The Company’s results could be materially adversely affected in the event of conflicts or failures to successfully negotiate necessary terms or agreements with its Employees or its Employees’ representatives.
Previous wording
The Company’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain appropriate levels of skilled personnel. In connection with the drastic reduction in travel demand due to the pandemic, in 2020 the Company offered voluntary separation and extended time-off programs to Employees. This negatively impacted the Company's ability to staff appropriately when demand for leisure travel returned. Although the Company surpassed pre-pandemic staffing levels in 2023, Boeing aircraft delivery delays, network optimization efforts, and cost control initiatives required the Company to re-evaluate its hiring needs in 2024 and beyond and moderate staffing in line with demand. Staffing-related challenges, particularly any unpredictability in required staffing levels, could continue to occur in certain areas and limit the Company's ability to optimally adjust capacity. The inability to recruit and retain skilled personnel or the unexpected loss of key skilled personnel could continue to adversely affect the Company’s operations.
Current wording
The Company’s success depends on its ability to attract and retain appropriate levels of skilled personnel. In connection with the drastic reduction in travel demand due to the pandemic, in 2020 the Company offered voluntary separation and extended time-off programs to Employees. This negatively impacted the Company’s ability to staff appropriately when demand for leisure travel returned. Boeing aircraft delivery delays, network optimization efforts, and cost control initiatives have also required the Company to re-evaluate its hiring needs and moderate staffing in line with demand. As a result, the Company offered a voluntary separation program to certain Employees in 2024, and the Company implemented a reduction in workforce in 2025. Staffing-related challenges, particularly any unpredictability in required staffing levels, could continue to occur in certain areas and limit the Company’s ability to optimally adjust capacity. The inability to recruit and retain skilled personnel or the unexpected loss of key skilled personnel could continue to adversely affect the Company’s operations.
Previous wording
The Company is also dependent on third-party vendors and service providers. The COVID-19 pandemic and current economic conditions have resulted, and could continue to result, in delays and other performance issues, ceased operations, or even bankruptcies among suppliers, third-party vendors, and service providers. The operations of the Company’s third-party vendors and service providers could also be affected by the policies, procedures, and performance of their suppliers, and the Company may not have visibility into this multi-tiered supply chain. Failures of suppliers, third-party vendors, or service providers to timely provide adequate products or support for their products, or otherwise fulfill their commitments to the Company, could materially adversely affect the Company’s operations.
Current wording
The Company is also dependent on third-party vendors and service providers. Adverse macroeconomic conditions have resulted, and could continue to result, in delays and other performance issues, ceased operations, or even bankruptcies among suppliers, third-party vendors, and service providers. The operations of the Company’s third-party vendors and service providers could also be affected by the policies, procedures, and performance of their suppliers, and the Company may not have visibility into this multi-tiered supply chain. Failures of suppliers, third-party vendors, or service providers to timely provide adequate products or support for their products, or otherwise fulfill their commitments to the Company, could materially adversely affect the Company’s operations.
Previous wording
Terrorist attacks or other crimes and hostilities, actual and threatened, have from time to time materially adversely affected the demand for air travel and have necessitated increased safety and security measures and related costs for the Company and the airline industry generally. Safety and security measures can create delays and inconveniences, which in turn can reduce the Company's competitiveness against surface transportation for short-haul routes and alternatives to transportation such as videoconferencing, business communication platforms, and the Internet. Additional terrorist attacks or other hostilities, even if not made directly on the airline industry, or the fear of such attacks or other hostilities (including elevated national threat warnings, government travel warnings to certain destinations, travel restrictions, or selective cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror threats) would likely have a further significant negative impact on the Company and the airline industry.
Current wording
Terrorist attacks, war, or other hostilities, actual and threatened, have from time to time materially adversely affected the demand for air travel and have necessitated increased safety and security measures and related costs for the Company and the airline industry generally. Safety and security measures can create delays and inconveniences, which in turn can reduce the Company’s competitiveness against surface transportation for short-haul routes and alternatives to transportation such as videoconferencing, business communication platforms, and the Internet. Additional terrorist attacks, war, or other hostilities, even if not made directly on the airline industry, or the fear of such attacks or other hostilities (including elevated national threat warnings, government travel warnings to certain destinations, travel restrictions, or selective cancellation or redirection of flights due to terror threats) would likely have a further significant negative impact on the Company and the airline industry.
Previous wording
While the Company operates across a diverse geographic footprint, its operations at times have been adversely and materially impacted by severe weather, such as Hurricanes Harvey and Irma in 2017, Winter Storm Elliott in December 2022, and Hurricane Milton in October 2024. Depending on location, the Company’s assets and route network have been or could be exposed to ongoing risks arising from a variety of adverse weather conditions or localized natural or manmade disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes, wildfires (such as the 2023 Maui wildfires and the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires), hurricanes, tropical storms, tornadoes, floods, sea-level rise, severe winter weather, sustained or extreme cold or heat, drought, or other disturbances, actual or threatened. Extreme weather conditions, including increases in the frequency, severity, or duration of severe weather events (whether or not caused by anthropogenic climate change), can disrupt air travel from time to time, ground planes, damage equipment and increase maintenance costs, cause delays and cancellations or other network disruptions, require implementation of weight limitations due to increased temperatures, increase turbulence-related injuries, cause disruptions in staffing, cause increases in fuel consumption to avoid such weather, disrupt the Company’s supply chains (including fuel, parts, and service provider disruptions), and otherwise adversely affect the Company’s assets, operations, and infrastructure. These events can decrease revenue, increase costs, and adversely impact the Company’s financial condition. Prolonged interruptions or disruptions at airports can and do also adversely impact the Company’s business and results of operations. The Company also may incur significant costs to reestablish or relocate affected business functions, aircraft, and Employees. Moreover, any resulting economic dislocations could adversely affect demand for the Company’s services, resulting in an adverse effect on its business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Current wording
While the Company operates across a diverse geographic footprint, its operations at times have been adversely and materially impacted by severe weather, such as Winter Storm Fern in January 2026, Hurricane Milton in October 2024, and Winter Storm Elliott in December 2022. Depending on location, the Company’s assets and route network have been or could be exposed to ongoing risks arising from a variety of adverse weather conditions or localized natural or manmade disasters such as earthquakes, volcanoes, wildfires (such as the 2023 Maui wildfires and the 2025 Los Angeles wildfires), hurricanes, tropical storms, tornadoes, floods, sea-level rise, severe winter weather, sustained or extreme cold or heat, drought, or other disturbances, actual or threatened. Extreme weather conditions, including increases in the frequency, severity, or duration of severe weather events (whether or not caused by anthropogenic climate change), can disrupt air travel from time to time, ground planes, damage equipment and increase maintenance costs, cause delays and cancellations or other network disruptions, require implementation of weight limitations due to increased temperatures, increase turbulence-related injuries, cause disruptions in staffing, cause increases in fuel consumption to avoid such weather, disrupt the Company’s supply chains (including fuel, parts, and service provider disruptions), and otherwise adversely affect the Company’s assets, operations, and infrastructure. The Company could incur significant costs to improve the resiliency of its operations, infrastructure, and supply chain, and otherwise prepare for, respond to, and mitigate the potential acute and chronic physical effects of climate change. The Company is not able to predict accurately the materiality of any potential losses or costs associated with the extreme weather events. Prolonged interruptions or disruptions at airports can and do also adversely impact the Company’s business and results of operations. The Company also may incur significant costs to reestablish or relocate affected business functions, aircraft, and Employees. Moreover, any resulting economic dislocations could adversely affect demand for the Company’s services, resulting in an adverse effect on its business, results of operations, and financial condition.
Previous wording
•actual or potential disruptions in the air traffic control system (including, for example, as a result of FAA system outages or inadequate FAA staffing levels, as the United States has recently seen a shortage of air traffic controllers);
Current wording
•actual or potential disruptions in the air traffic control system (including, for example, as a result of FAA system outages or inadequate FAA staffing levels, as the United States has recently seen a shortage of air traffic controllers, resulting in more frequent and prolonged flight delays, limitations on the number of offered flights, and disrupting travel plans across the entire network);
Previous wording
•outbreaks of disease such as the COVID-19 pandemic; and
Current wording
•outbreaks of disease such as the COVID-19 pandemic;
Showing the first 40 of 57 pairs. Open the source sections for the rest.
Rearranged current paragraphs (2)
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
The Company currently operates a higher proportion of the Boeing 737 aircraft than other air carriers in the industry, and therefore may encounter novel hazards, age-related maintenance issues, or airworthiness issues associated with 737 aircraft to a larger degree than other carriers with more diversified fleets. Boeing no longer manufactures versions of the 737 other than the MAX family of aircraft. If the MAX aircraft were to become unavailable for the Company’s flight operations, the Company’s operations would be materially adversely affected. Further, if the -7 certification is not completed in a timely manner, the Company’s growth and network plans could be restricted unless and until it could procure and operate other types of aircraft from Boeing or another manufacturer, seller, or lessor.
Current report — wording carried from elsewhere
The Company makes certain disclosures regarding sustainability, many of which are based on estimates, assumptions, and timelines which are subject to high levels of uncertainty and inherently difficult to assess in advance. There is no guarantee that Customers, regulators, or other stakeholders will not object to the Company’s use of certain models and accounting methods. Enhanced mandatory climate-related disclosures could lead to reputational or other harm with Customers, regulators, investors, or other stakeholders. Statements or initiatives with respect to sustainability matters are also increasingly subject to heightened scrutiny from the public and governmental authorities. The Company may face pressure from Customers, stakeholders, and financial institutions to change its policies, and such stakeholders may have different, conflicting expectations. Certain regulators, such as the SEC and various state agencies, as well as nongovernmental organizations and other private actors have filed lawsuits under various securities and consumer protection laws alleging that certain sustainability statements, goals, or standards were misleading, false, or otherwise deceptive. Alternatively, the Company could face criticism from certain “anti-ESG” parties for making environmental or social commitments or pursuing certain environmental or social initiatives that are alleged to be political or polarizing in nature, which could adversely affect the Company’s reputation, business, financial performance, market access, and growth.
Rearranged previous paragraphs (3)
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
•enhanced emissions and climate reporting obligations;
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The Company operates in a public-facing industry with significant exposure to social media. Negative publicity, whether or not justified, can spread rapidly through social media. The Company’s reputation or brand, as well as its Customer and other stakeholder relationships, could be adversely impacted as a result of, among other things, (i) any failure to meet its ESG plans or goals or any modifications to such goals; (ii) Customer perceptions of the
Previous report — wording carried elsewhere
The Company’s Bylaws designate specific courts as the exclusive forum for certain legal actions between the Company and its Shareholders, which could increase costs to bring a claim, discourage claims, or limit the ability of the Company’s Shareholders to bring a claim in a judicial forum viewed by the Shareholders as more favorable for disputes with the Company or the Company’s directors, officers, or other Employees.