Skip to main content

OLD REPUBLIC INTERNATIONAL CORP

For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Feb 26, 2026.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.

FY2025 · Filed Feb 26, 2026

ORI$39.61-1.9%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026

What changed in Risk Factors?

Read the current filing

Previous report: 10-K

Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-02-27.

0000074260-25-000042

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Current report: 10-K

Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-02-26.

0000074260-26-000008

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.

Compared 75 previous paragraphs and 77 current paragraphs.

57 unchanged; 18 reworded; 1 added; 0 removed; 0 previous and 1 current paragraphs rearranged.

Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.

A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.

Added paragraphs (1)

Current report

Item 1A - Risk Factors
Reworded paragraphs (18)

Previous wording

Moreover, for long-tail coverages which generally include workers' compensation, commercial auto liability, general liability, errors and omissions (E&O) and directors’ and officers' (D&O) liability, as well as title insurance, significant periods of time often elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to the Company, and the payment of that loss. The length of time required to ultimately settle long-tailed claims and the costs associated with resolving these claims, coupled with uncertain and sometimes variable judicial rulings on coverage and policy allocation issues, along with the possibility of legislative actions, makes reserving for these exposures highly uncertain and creates a risk of possibly adverse developments in both known and yet unknown claims.

Current wording

Moreover, for long-tail coverages which generally include workers' compensation, commercial auto liability, general liability, errors and omissions (E&O) and directors’ and officers' (D&O) liability, as well as title insurance, significant periods of time often elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to the Company, and the payment of that loss. The length of time required to ultimately settle long-tailed claims and the costs associated with resolving these claims, coupled with uncertain and sometimes variable judicial rulings on coverage and policy allocation issues, along with the possibility of legislative actions, makes reserving for these exposures highly uncertain and creates a risk of possibly adverse developments in both known and unknown claims.

Previous wording

As a result of these uncertainties, the ultimate paid loss and loss adjustment expense may deviate, perhaps substantially, from the point-in-time estimates of such losses and expenses, as reflected in the loss reserves included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For example, for the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, the Company experienced consolidated favorable development of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in prior years of $151.9, $305.8, and $282.6, respectively, which had a positive effect on consolidated results of operations in those periods. To the extent that loss and loss adjustment expenses exceed initial estimates, the Company's policy is to immediately recognize the less favorable experience and increase loss reserves, with a corresponding reduction in net income in the period in which the unfavorable development is identified.

Current wording

As a result of these uncertainties, the ultimate paid loss and loss adjustment expense may deviate, perhaps substantially, from the point-in-time estimates of such losses and expenses, as reflected in the loss reserves included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For example, for the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company experienced consolidated favorable development of reserves for losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred in prior years of $189.4, $151.9, and $305.8, respectively, which had a positive effect on consolidated results of operations in those periods. To the extent that loss and loss adjustment expenses exceed initial estimates, the Company's policy is to immediately recognize the less favorable experience and increase loss reserves, with a corresponding reduction in net income in the period in which the unfavorable development is identified.

Previous wording

Investment income is an important component of the Company’s net income and one of its primary sources of cash flow to support operations. As of December 31, 2024, the consolidated investment portfolio reflected an allocation of approximately 84% to fixed income (bonds and notes) and short-term investments, and 16% to equity securities (common and preferred stocks). For the years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022, the Company reported $673.1, $578.3, and $459.5 of net investment income, respectively.

Current wording

Investment income is an important component of the Company’s net income and one of its primary sources of cash flow to support operations. As of December 31, 2025, the consolidated investment portfolio reflected an allocation of approximately 85% to fixed income (bonds and notes) and short-term investments, and 15% to equity securities (common and preferred stocks). For the years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023, the Company reported $708.7, $673.1, and $578.3 of net investment income, respectively.

Previous wording

The Company has credit risk with counterparties associated with investments, premiums receivable, and reinsurance recoverables. The Company’s subsidiaries have significant business relationships with financial institutions, particularly national banks. To secure the obligations of the insureds and certain reinsurers, the insurance subsidiaries are often the beneficiaries of a significant amount of security in the form of letters of credit, trust funds, and pledged investments. Other banks serve as depositories holding large sums of money in escrow accounts established by the Company's Title Insurance subsidiaries. Accordingly, there is a risk of concentrated financial exposure in one or more such commercial banking institutions. These counterparties may default on their obligations to the Company due to bankruptcy, insolvency, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud, government intervention and other reasons. If any of these institutions fail or are unable to honor their credit obligations, or if escrowed funds become lost or tied up due to the failure of a bank, the result could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Current wording

The Company has credit risk with counterparties associated with investments, premiums receivable, and reinsurance recoverables. The Company’s subsidiaries have significant business relationships with financial institutions, particularly national banks. To secure the obligations of the insureds and certain reinsurers, the insurance subsidiaries are often the beneficiaries of a significant amount of security in the form of letters of credit, trust funds, and pledged investments. Other banks serve as depositories holding large sums of money in escrow accounts established by the Company's Title Insurance subsidiaries. Accordingly, there is a risk of concentrated financial exposure in one or more such commercial banking institutions. These counterparties may default on their obligations to the Company due to bankruptcy, insolvency, lack of liquidity, adverse economic conditions, operational failure, fraud, government intervention and other reasons. If any of these institutions fail or are unable to honor their credit obligations, or if escrowed funds are lost or become inaccessible due to the failure of a bank, the result could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Previous wording

The payment of dividends by the Company’s insurance subsidiaries is restricted by state insurance laws or subject to approval of the insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which the subsidiaries are domiciled. These authorities recognize only statutory accounting practices for determining financial position, results of operations, and the ability of an insurer to pay dividends to its shareholders. The specific rules governing the payment of dividends by the Company’s insurance subsidiaries vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in many different jurisdictions. Generally, the insurance subsidiaries are prohibited from paying dividends to the holding company in excess of either the greater or lesser of (depending upon the state involved) 10% of statutory surplus or a portion of statutory net income without the prior approval of the applicable insurance regulatory authority. Dividends declared during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024, 2023, and 2022 to the holding company by its subsidiaries amounted to $645.7, $673.3, and $614.6, respectively. There can be no assurance that the Company’s subsidiaries will be able to continue to pay such dividends to the Company in the future. If the Company’s subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends to the holding company in amounts necessary to satisfy existing obligations, the Company’s ability to service its debt and pay dividends to its shareholders would be adversely affected.

Current wording

These authorities recognize only statutory accounting practices for determining financial condition, results of operations, and the ability of an insurer to pay dividends to its shareholders. The specific rules governing the payment of dividends by the Company’s insurance subsidiaries vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in many different jurisdictions. Generally, the insurance subsidiaries are prohibited from paying dividends to the holding company in excess of either the greater or lesser of (depending upon the state involved) 10% of statutory surplus or a portion of statutory net income without the prior approval of the applicable insurance regulatory authority. Dividends declared during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2025, 2024, and 2023 to the holding company by its subsidiaries amounted to $719.5, $645.7, and $673.3, respectively. There can be no assurance that the Company’s subsidiaries will be able to continue to pay such dividends to the Company in the future. If the Company’s subsidiaries are unable to pay dividends to the holding company in amounts necessary to satisfy existing obligations, the Company’s ability to service its debt and pay dividends to its shareholders would be adversely affected.

Previous wording

The Company depends upon technology-based information systems to conduct business. The Company uses computer systems and other electronic information resources, including both proprietary and third-party technology systems and tools, to process, transmit, receive, and store certain personal, confidential, and proprietary information; to communicate with customers, service providers and other third parties by email and other electronic means; and perform various business operations, including transferring significant amounts of funds using electronic means.

Current wording

The Company depends upon technology-based information systems to conduct business. The Company uses computer systems and other electronic information resources, including both proprietary and third-party technology systems and tools, to process, transmit, receive, and store certain personal, confidential, and proprietary information; to communicate with customers, service providers and other third parties by email and other electronic means; and to perform various business operations, including transferring significant amounts of funds using electronic means.

Previous wording

The Company’s systems and processes have been, and will likely remain, subject to cyber-attacks and other intrusions. These attacks are occurring with greater frequency and sophistication, and include malware and computer virus attacks, ransomware, unauthorized access, misuse, denial-of-service attacks, system failures and disruptions. A future breach of the Company’s systems or the systems of a third-party vendor or services provider could disrupt the Company’s ability to conduct business operations. During such an event, systems may be inaccessible to employees, customers, or business partners for an extended period of time and employees may be unable to perform their duties. These attacks could expose the Company to substantial costs and negative consequences, including the loss of funds, costs of investigation and remediation, lost revenues, and reputational damage.

Current wording

The Company’s systems and processes and those of the Company's service providers have been, and will likely remain, subject to cyber-attacks and other intrusions. These attacks are occurring with greater frequency and sophistication, and include ransomware and other malware and computer viruses designed to provide attackers with unauthorized access to, or misuse or disruption of, information systems of the Company and its service providers. A future breach of the systems of the Company, or its third-party vendors or service providers, could result in the exposure of information processed by or on behalf of the Company to unauthorized access, misuse or loss, and disrupt the Company’s ability to conduct business operations. During such an event, systems may be inaccessible to employees, service providers, customers, or business partners for an extended period of time, disrupting the ability of the Company to conduct business. These attacks could expose the Company to substantial costs and negative consequences, including the loss of funds, costs of investigation and remediation, lost revenues, reputational damage, and losses related to enforcement actions and litigation.

Previous wording

In addition, the email and computer systems used by the Company, its service providers, and agents for the transfer of funds have been subject to fraudulent spoofing attacks. In some cases, unauthorized access or fraudulent attacks have not been immediately detected, thereby increasing the severity of the incident. Funds transferred to a fraudulent recipient are not always recoverable and the Company may be liable for those unrecovered funds. Losses resulting from unrecovered funds could result in a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Current wording

In addition, the email and computer systems used by the Company, its service providers, and agents for the transfer of funds have been subject to phishing and spoofing attacks designed to fraudulently direct the transfer of funds or information to an attacker. These attacks have been widely reported to involve the use of AI by attackers in order to increase their effectiveness. In some cases, unauthorized access or fraudulent transfers resulting from these attacks have not been immediately detected, thereby potentially increasing the severity of the incident. Funds transferred to a fraudulent recipient are not always recoverable and the Company may be liable for those unrecovered funds. Losses resulting from unrecovered funds could result in a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition and results of operations.

Previous wording

Old Republic regularly monitors its networks, infrastructure and procedures in an effort to prevent, detect, address, and mitigate these risks. There is no assurance that the Company’s security procedures will provide fully effective protection from such events. A cyber incident or fraud attack could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Old Republic regularly monitors its networks, infrastructure and procedures in an effort to prevent, detect, address, and mitigate these risks. There is no assurance that the Company’s security safeguards will provide fully effective protection from such events. A cyber-attack or incident related to fraudulent transfers of funds or information could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Previous wording

Furthermore, Old Republic’s businesses must comply with laws and regulations enacted by U.S. federal and state governments, as well as laws enacted by various regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to the privacy and security of the information of clients, employees, or others. These laws and regulations are increasing in complexity and number, change frequently, and sometimes conflict. The compromise of personal, confidential, or proprietary information could expose the Company to liability under federal and state laws, subject it to litigation and investigations, and result in reputational harm, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Furthermore, Old Republic’s businesses must comply with laws and regulations enacted by U.S. federal and state governments, as well as the requirements of various regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to the privacy and security of the information of customers, employees, or others. These requirements, which change frequently, are increasing in complexity and number, and are often inconsistent. The compromise of personal, confidential, or proprietary information could expose the Company to liability from these legal and regulatory requirements, subject it to litigation and investigations, and result in financial and reputational harm, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Previous wording

The use by businesses, including the Company, of AI and machine learning technologies such as generative AI continues to develop with increasing complexity and changes in the nature of technology. Laws and regulations related to AI are evolving, and there is uncertainty as to potential adoption of new laws and regulations and the application of existing laws and regulations to the use of AI. Old Republic’s businesses must comply with laws and regulations enacted by U.S. federal and state governments, as well as laws enacted by various regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to the use of AI. Certain decisions made by Old Republic’s businesses using AI must comply with the legal and regulatory standards that apply to these decisions, including unfair trade practice laws. These standards require, at a minimum, that decisions made by Old Republic’s businesses are not inaccurate, arbitrary, capricious, or unfairly discriminatory. Compliance with these standards is required regardless of the tools and methods Old Republic uses to make such decisions. In the absence of proper controls, AI has the potential to increase the risk of inaccurate, arbitrary, capricious, or unfairly discriminatory outcomes for consumers. The changing legislative and regulatory environment, an inability to develop appropriate governance and controls, or a lack of internal product or engineering expertise could lead to adverse consequences and subject the Company to competitive harm, legal liability, heightened regulatory scrutiny, and brand or reputational harm.

Current wording

The use by businesses, including the Company, of AI and machine learning technologies such as generative AI continues to develop with increasing complexity and changes in the nature of technology. Laws and regulations related to AI are evolving, and there is uncertainty as to potential adoption of new laws and regulations and the application of existing laws and regulations to the use of AI. Old Republic’s businesses must comply with laws and regulations enacted by U.S. federal and state governments, as well as requirements of various regulatory organizations or exchanges relating to the use of AI. Certain decisions made by Old Republic’s businesses using AI must comply with the legal and regulatory standards that apply to these decisions, including unfair trade practice laws. These standards require, at a minimum, that decisions made by Old Republic’s businesses are not inaccurate, arbitrary, capricious, or unfairly discriminatory. Compliance with these standards is required regardless of the tools and methods Old Republic uses to make such decisions. In the absence of proper controls, AI has the potential to increase the risk of inaccurate, arbitrary, capricious, or unfairly discriminatory outcomes for consumers. The changing legislative and regulatory environment, an inability to develop appropriate governance and controls, or a lack of internal product or engineering expertise could lead to adverse consequences and subject the Company to competitive harm, legal liability, heightened regulatory scrutiny, and brand or reputational harm.

Previous wording

Like other large insurance companies, Old Republic continually faces risks associated with litigation of various types, including claims litigation arising in the ordinary course, corporate litigation, and disputes relating to bad faith allegations. Any of this litigation could result in the Company incurring losses in excess of policy limits. The Company typically is a party to a variety of litigation matters throughout the year. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and if there were an outcome unfavorable to the Company, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on its results of operations and financial position in the period in which the outcome occurs. Even if an unfavorable outcome does not materialize, the Company still may face substantial expense and disruption associated with the litigation.

Current wording

Like other large insurance companies, Old Republic continually faces risks associated with litigation of various types, including claims litigation arising in the ordinary course, corporate litigation, and disputes relating to bad faith allegations. Any of this litigation could result in the Company incurring losses in excess of policy limits. The Company typically is a party to a variety of litigation matters throughout the year. Litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and if there were an outcome unfavorable to the Company, there exists the possibility of a material adverse impact on its results of operations and financial condition in the period in which the outcome occurs. Even if an unfavorable outcome does not materialize, the Company still may face substantial expense and disruption associated with the litigation.

Previous wording

If the Company’s investments in new underwriting subsidiaries are unsuccessful, the Company’s expectations for top- and bottom-line growth may not be met.

Current wording

If the Company’s investments in new operating companies are unsuccessful, the Company’s expectations for top- and bottom-line growth may not be met.

Previous wording

A significant component of the Company’s growth strategy includes the successful investment in new specialized insurance businesses focused on specialty niches. The Company makes upfront investments to build these new ventures and additional expenditures are required to support them as they seek to grow to scale. These new underwriting subsidiaries may not meet the Company's growth and profitability targets, and given the start-up nature of these new businesses, there is a risk that the Company could suffer the loss of all or a significant portion of its capital investments.

Current wording

A significant component of the Company’s growth strategy includes the successful investment in new specialized insurance businesses focused on specialty niches. The Company makes upfront investments to build these new ventures and additional expenditures are required to support them as they seek to grow to scale. These new operating companies may not meet the Company's growth and profitability targets, and given the start-up nature of these new businesses, there is a risk that the Company could suffer the loss of all or a significant portion of its capital investments.

Previous wording

While the Specialty Insurance segment does not have a meaningful exposure to personal lines insurance such as homeowners and private auto coverages, the property, casualty, or liability insurance it underwrites creates exposure to claims arising out of catastrophes. The two principal catastrophe exposures are natural catastrophes and acts of terrorism. As it relates to workers' compensation policies, the exposure is greatest in areas where there are large concentrations of employees of an insured employer or other individuals who could potentially be injured and assert claims against an insured under workers' compensation policies. Collateral damage to property or persons from acts of terrorism and other calamities could also expose general liability policies.

Current wording

While the Specialty Insurance segment does not have a meaningful exposure to homeowners or private auto coverages, the property, casualty, and liability insurance it underwrites creates exposure to claims arising out of catastrophes. The two principal catastrophe exposures are natural catastrophes and acts of terrorism. As it relates to workers' compensation policies, the exposure is greatest in areas where there are large concentrations of employees of an insured employer or other individuals who could potentially be injured and assert claims against an insured under workers' compensation policies. Collateral damage to property or persons from acts of terrorism and other calamities could also expose general liability policies.

Previous wording

Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, the reinsurance industry eliminated coverage from substantially all reinsurance contracts for claims arising from acts of terrorism. As discussed elsewhere in this report, the U.S. Congress subsequently passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), the Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act (TRIREA), and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (TRIPRA) legislation that requires primary insurers to offer coverage for certified acts of terrorism under most commercial property and casualty insurance policies. Although these programs established a temporary federal reinsurance program through December 31, 2027, primary insurers like the Company’s Specialty Insurance subsidiaries retain significant exposure for terrorist act-related losses.

Current wording

Following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attack, the reinsurance industry eliminated coverage from substantially all reinsurance contracts for claims arising from acts of terrorism. As discussed elsewhere in this report, the U.S. Congress subsequently passed the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA), the Terrorism Risk Insurance Revision and Extension Act (TRIREA), and the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act (TRIPRA) legislation that collectively requires primary insurers to offer coverage for certified acts of terrorism under most commercial property and casualty insurance policies. Although these programs established a temporary federal reinsurance program through December 31, 2027, primary insurers like the Company’s Specialty Insurance subsidiaries retain significant exposure for terrorist act-related losses.

Previous wording

For the year ended December 31, 2024, approximately $2.0 billion or 77.0% of the Title Insurance segment’s consolidated premium and related fee income was produced by independent title agents. The other three large national title insurers generate a higher percentage of their business through employees or owned insurance agencies. Independent title agents can direct business to any title insurer, whereas owned agencies will typically direct business solely to their parent or affiliated title insurers. If the products and services provided by competitors are more attractive to independent title agents, or if the number of, or amount of business produced by, independent title agents decreases, the segment’s business may be adversely affected.

Current wording

For the year ended December 31, 2025, approximately $2.2 billion or 78.1% of the Title Insurance segment’s consolidated premium and related fee income was produced by independent title agents. The other three large national title insurers generate a higher percentage of their business through employees or owned insurance agencies. Independent title agents can direct business to any title insurer, whereas owned agencies will typically direct business solely to their parent or affiliated title insurers. If the products and services provided by competitors are more attractive to independent title agents, or if the number of, or amount of business produced by, independent title agents decreases, the segment’s business may be adversely affected.

Previous wording

Florida is the largest source of revenue for the Title Insurance segment. In the aggregate in 2024, Florida accounted for approximately 24% of total segment consolidated premium and related fee income. As a result of the significant income derived from customers in this state, the Title Insurance segment is exposed to adverse business or regulatory conditions that significantly or disproportionally affect Florida. For example, a declining business climate or real estate market that is localized in Florida could have an adverse effect on the segment’s results of operations. Adverse regulatory developments, including reductions in rates or increased regulatory or capital requirements in Florida could similarly adversely affect the segment’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Current wording

Florida is the largest source of revenue for the Title Insurance segment. In the aggregate in 2025, Florida accounted for approximately 23% of total segment consolidated premium and related fee income. As a result of the significant income derived from customers in this state, the Title Insurance segment is exposed to adverse business or regulatory conditions that significantly or disproportionally affect Florida. For example, a declining business climate or real estate market that is localized in Florida could have an adverse effect on the segment’s results of operations. Adverse regulatory developments, including reductions in rates or increased regulatory or capital requirements in Florida could similarly adversely affect the segment’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Rearranged current paragraphs (1)

Current report — wording carried from elsewhere

The payment of dividends by the Company’s insurance subsidiaries is restricted by state insurance laws or subject to approval of the insurance regulatory authorities in the jurisdictions in which the subsidiaries are domiciled.