WELLS FARGO COMPANYMN
For the period ended Apr 30, 2024. Filed Mar 18, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
What shareholders are asked to vote on at a company's meeting. It is where to find what directors and top executives are paid, and who owns the most shares.
Apr 30, 2024 · Filed Mar 18, 2024
Contents
Performance Assessment and Variable Compensation Determination Process
2023 Process
The HRC assesses NEO performance through evaluation against pre-established financial and non-financial goals. This includes consideration of financial results and progress against strategic priorities, providing the flexibility to assess both quantitative and qualitative results. This process aligns variable compensation determinations with performance against the Company’s long-term value drivers and prudent risk oversight, and provides the HRC with the ability to reduce an individual NEO’s performance achievement level for material failures in risk management, including but not limited to misconduct. The HRC believes that using a single formula to evaluate performance and determine compensation is not practical and may not fully reflect the scope and complexity of our business and the regulatory risks and other non-financial outcomes that impact our Company success. This rigorous process enables the HRC to evaluate Company, CEO, and each of our other NEO’s overall performance, which serves as the basis for compensation decisions, as described in more detail below.
1 Set Goals
Our Board sets our strategic direction and risk appetite, including approval of our strategic plan annually which includes our five strategic pillars. The five strategic pillars are used to frame the goals the HRC uses to assess Company, individual, and, as applicable, line of business performance. Three of the strategic pillars – Risk and Control Culture, Operational Excellence, and Customer-Centric Culture and Conduct – focus on advancing our risk and control culture, supported by Technology and Innovation (4th pillar), to collectively drive our top priority of building a risk and control infrastructure appropriate for our size and complexity, and Financial Strength (5th pillar).
At the beginning of each year, individual NEO goals are set tailored to their area of responsibility with a focus on supporting broader Company goals. For 2023, consistent with 2022, the strategic pillars, Company, and individual NEO goals are broadly categorized below:
| Strategic Pillars | Company Goals | Individual/Line of Business* Goals |
|---|---|---|
| •Risk & Control Culture•Operational Excellence •Customer-Centric Culture & Conduct •Technology & Innovation•Financial Strength | •Risk, Regulatory, & Control•Financial•Operational Excellence•Customer-Centric Culture & Conduct•Technology & Innovation•ESG (including DE&I and Community Engagement)•Talent & Leadership | •Risk, Regulatory, & Control•Financial•Strategy, Technology, & innovation•Talent, Leadership, & Culture (including DE&I) |
- Line of Business Goals are included for CEOs of each business line.
2 Evaluate Performance
The HRC assesses performance holistically and regularly monitors and reviews Company performance throughout the year. At the end of the year, the HRC (and the Board for the CEO) assesses Company and individual NEO performance against the financial and non-financial goals set at the beginning of the year, in addition to risk performance informed by the Chief Risk Officer (CRO) (see Independent Risk Assessment below for details). The outcome of the performance evaluation is directly used to determine NEO variable compensation.
| 62 | Wells Fargo & Co. |
Similar to last year, the HRC focused on our NEOs’ progress in: strengthening our risk and control infrastructure, which includes addressing open historical and emerging issues; and advancing our business through technology and innovation to increase internal operational efficiency so we can deploy resources to better serve our customers and communities. We anticipate that the HRC’s focus on these two areas will continue for the foreseeable future to help drive the Company’s transformation.
HRC’s Evaluation Process:
CEO
| The CEO completes a self-assessment of his performance which is shared with the HRC and the Board. | The HRC assesses the CEO's performance in an executive session without him present, with input from the Board. | The HRC approves CEO compensation with a recommendation to the Board. The Board considers the HRC’s assessment in the Board’s approval of CEO compensation. |
|---|
Other NEOs
| The CEO provides his evaluation of performance and recommendation of achievement levels for each individual NEO. | The HRC reviews, provides input, and confirms achievement levels that include risk considerations for overall Company and individual NEO performance, and business performance, as applicable. | The HRC approves NEO compensation. |
|---|
Independent Risk Assessment
The CRO provides an independent risk assessment for each of the NEOs, other than the CEO. During this process, the CRO assesses the extent of each NEO’s (other than the CEO) involvement in and accountability (if any) related to risk events that took place, or were identified, during the year. For the CEO, the HRC conducts a risk assessment with input from the Risk Committee Chair (who is also a member of the HRC), as well as the CRO. Further, each NEO is assessed on driving measurable progress towards advancing the Company’s risk and control environment, which includes resolving outstanding regulatory matters and commitments. The risk assessments are incorporated into each NEO’s overall performance assessment, and the HRC may reduce or eliminate an NEO’s variable compensation for the applicable performance year due to risk failures, as well as take other actions under the Company’s Clawback Policies depending on the nature and impact of adverse risk outcomes.
3 Determine Variable Compensation
The HRC utilizes a structured approach to determine each NEO’s variable compensation. Under this approach, Company and individual NEO achievement levels, including line of business performance (as applicable), and risk considerations are evaluated by the HRC to determine total performance achievement. CEO and other NEO variable compensation is then determined using each NEO’s target variable compensation and total achievement level, with potential adjustments for the other NEOs based on progress on diverse representation and inclusion across specific groups of NEO senior leadership teams. The total variable compensation process is illustrated below.
| 2024 Proxy Statement | 63 |
|---|
| Total PerformanceAchievement %(see weightings below) | X | Target Variable Compensation | = | Total VariableCompensation |
|---|
Total Performance Achievement % Weightings:
| Company % | Individual % | Business Line % (as applicable) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEO | 65% | 35% | N/A |
| Functional NEOs | 50% | 50% | N/A |
| Business Line CEOs | 30% | 50% | 20% |
Once the total variable compensation is determined, it is delivered through a pre-set pay mix. The HRC implemented this approach to enhance disclosure of its variable compensation determination process. Refer to the 2023 Named Executive Officer Compensation section below for individual NEO achievement level weightings used by the HRC to determine variable compensation.
| 64 | Wells Fargo & Co. |
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.