Summit Midstream Corp

To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of Summit Midstream Corporation

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Summit Midstream Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 16, 2026, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Acquisition and Divestitures – Purchase Price Accounting — Refer to Note 3 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, on March 10, 2025, the Company completed the acquisition of Moonrise Midstream LLC, (“Moonrise”) for $70 million in cash and 462,265 shares of Common Stock of the Company. Accordingly, the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their preliminary estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The valuation of assets acquired are based on preliminary appraisals, available market data, and cost and income approaches. These methods are considered Level 3 fair value estimates and include significant assumptions of future gathering and processing volumes, commodity prices, and operating and capital cost estimates, discounted using a weighted average cost of capital.

We identified the valuation of property, plant and equipment related to the Moonrise acquisition as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates and assumptions made by management. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the involvement of our fair value specialists, when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's selection of a weighted average cost of capital, and the preliminary fair value of the acquired property, plant and equipment assets.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's selection of a weighted average cost of capital, and the fair value of acquired property, plant and equipment included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over the purchase price allocation, including management's controls over the assumptions used in the valuation of property, plant and equipment.

•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the fair value of acquired property, plant and equipment by:

▪Evaluating the appropriateness of the valuation methodology.

▪Testing the cost to acquire or construct comparable assets and the remaining useful lives used for the cost approach for property, plant and equipment, including comparing such estimates to independent market information to determine reasonableness.

▪Testing the methodology used for the valuation of rights-of-way.

▪Developing a range of independent estimates of the weighted average cost of capital and comparing to the weighted average cost of capital utilized by management.

▪Evaluated management's use of experts related to the valuation of certain acquired assets including qualifications and methodology.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net - Determination of Impairment Indicators– Refer to Notes 2 and 5 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As described in Notes 2 and 5 to the Company's consolidated financial statements, the Company recorded approximately $1.84 billion of property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2025. The Company tests assets for impairment when events or circumstances indicate the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from its use and eventual disposition. If the Company concludes that an asset’s carrying value will not be recovered through future cash flows, the Company recognizes an impairment loss on the long-lived asset equal to the amount by which the carrying value exceeds its fair value.

We have identified the determination of impairment indicators for long-lived assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments management makes when determining whether events or changes in circumstances have occurred indicating that the carrying amounts of long-lived assets may not be recoverable. Auditing management’s judgements involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit effort required to address these matters, including the degree of auditor judgment and the extent of specialized knowledge needed.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the identification of impairment indicators for long-lived assets included the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting related to management’s identification of possible impairment indicators for long-lived assets that may indicate the carrying amount of long-lived assets may not be recoverable.

•We evaluated management’s analysis of impairment indicators by:

▪Assessing whether long-lived assets having indicators of impairment were appropriately identified.

▪Considering industry reports and the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as adverse changes in the regulatory environment, legislation or other factors that may represent impairment indicators not previously contemplated in management's analysis.

▪Evaluating management’s judgments around historical trends, macroeconomic and industry conditions, and whether projections are consistent with the Company’s operating strategy.

▪Inquiry of management over whether long-lived assets may be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of the assets' previously estimated useful life.

▪Inspecting minutes of the board of directors and committees of executive management to understand if there were factors that would represent potential impairment indicators for long-lived assets.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas

March 16, 2026

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2009.