Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1—Nature of Business Activities and Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of operations

The consolidated financial statements include Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (“Burke & Herbert”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Company (“the Bank”), together referred to as “the Company” for purposes of the Notes to the Financial Statements.

Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. was organized as a Virginia corporation in 2022 to serve as the holding company for the Bank. Burke & Herbert became a bank holding company when it commenced operations on October 1, 2022, following a reorganization transaction in which it acquired control of the Bank under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHCA”). This transaction was treated as an internal reorganization as all shareholders of the Bank became shareholders of the Company. The Company has no material operations other than owning the Bank. In September 2023, the Company elected to become a financial holding company under the BHCA. As a financial holding company of a Virginia state bank, the Company is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) and the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (the “Virginia BFI”). The Bank is a Virginia chartered commercial bank that commenced operations in 1852. The Bank became a member of the Federal Reserve System on December 31, 2024. The Bank is subject to regulation, supervision, and examination by the Federal Reserve (through the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond) and the Virginia BFI.

The Bank’s primary market area includes northern Virginia and West Virginia, and it has over 77 branches and commercial loan offices across Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia. The Company’s branch locations accept business and consumer deposits from a diverse customer base. The Company’s deposit products include checking, savings, and term certificate accounts. The Company’s loan portfolio includes commercial and consumer loans, a substantial portion of which are secured by real estate.

Merger with Summit Financial Group, Inc.

Effective on May 3, 2024 (the “Closing Date”), the Company completed its merger (the “Merger”) with Summit Financial Group, Inc., a West Virginia corporation (“Summit”), pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization and accompanying Plan of Merger dated August 24, 2023 between the Company and Summit (the “Merger Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, on the Closing Date, (i) Summit merged with and into the Company with the Company as the surviving entity, and (ii) immediately following the Merger, Summit Community Bank, Inc., a West Virginia chartered bank and wholly-owned subsidiary of Summit (“SCB”) merged with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving bank.

In the Merger, holders of Summit common stock outstanding at the effective time of the Merger received 0.5043 shares of the Company’s Common Stock for each share of Summit common stock they owned, subject to the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares. The total aggregate consideration payable in the Merger was approximately 7,405,772 shares of the Company’s Common Stock. Additionally, each share of the 6.0% Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series 2021 of Summit (the “Summit Series 2021 Preferred Stock”) issued and outstanding was converted into the right to receive a share of a newly created series of preferred stock of the Company, the Burke & Herbert Series 2021 Preferred Stock (the “Burke & Herbert Series 2021 Preferred Stock”). Summit’s results of operations are included from the Closing Date forward.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. and its wholly owned subsidiary Burke & Herbert Bank & Trust Company and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial reporting and with applicable quarterly reporting regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to GAAP and reflect practices of the banking industry. They do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As such, these unaudited financial statements

Note 1— Nature of Business Activities and Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of and for the year ending December 31, 2024, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2025.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Bank (as its wholly-owned subsidiary). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions between the Company and the Bank have been eliminated. In preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheet and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations in these financial statements, have been made. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any other interim period or for the full year. All December 31, 2024, amounts and disclosures included in this quarterly report were derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements. Certain items in the prior period have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on prior year net income or on shareholders’ equity.

Newly issued not yet adopted accounting standards

In November 2024, the FASB issued ASU 2024-03, Income Statement (Subtopic 220-40): Reporting Comprehensive Income—Expense Disaggregation Disclosures. This ASU seeks to improve the disclosures about a public business entity’s expenses and address requests from investors for more detailed information about the types of expenses in commonly presented expense captions. The amendments in this update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2026, and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2027. Early adoption is permitted. This ASU is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In October 2023, the FASB issued ASU 2023-06, Disclosure Improvements: Codification Amendments in Response to the SEC’s Disclosure Update and Simplification Initiative. This ASU incorporates certain amendments to SEC disclosure requirements into the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The amendments in the ASU are expected to clarify or improve disclosure and presentation requirements of a variety of Codification Topics, allow users to more easily compare entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosures with those entities that were not previously subject to the requirements, and align the requirements in the Codification with the SEC’s regulations. For entities subject to the SEC’s existing disclosure requirements and for entities required to file or furnish financial statements with or to the SEC in preparation for the sale of or for purposes of issuing securities that are not subject to contractual restrictions on transfer, the effective date for each amendment will be the date on which the SEC’s removal of the related disclosure requirement becomes effective. For all other entities, the effective date will be two years after the date of such removal. However, if by June 30, 2027, the SEC has not removed the related disclosure from its regulations, the amendments will be removed from the Codification and not become effective for any entity. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2023-06 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Note 2—Securities

The carrying amount of available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities and their approximate fair values at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, are summarized as follows (in thousands):

At June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, AFS securities with amortized costs of $1.1 billion and $1.2 billion, respectively, and with estimated fair values of $1.0 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, were pledged to serve as collateral for secured borrowings, derivative exposures, or to secure public deposits as required or permitted by law.

The proceeds from sales, calls, and maturities of debt securities available-for-sale, including principal payments received, and the related gross gains and losses realized, for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, were as follows (in thousands):

The tax benefit (provision) related to these net realized gains and losses for June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, was ($8.2) thousand, and ($128.7) thousand, respectively.

The maturities of AFS securities at June 30, 2025, were as follows (in thousands): (Expected maturities of securities not due at a single maturity date are based on average life at estimated prepayment speed. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right to call or prepay some obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties).

At June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, there were no holdings of securities of any one issuer, other than the U.S. Government and its agencies, in any amount greater than 10% of shareholders’ equity.

The following table shows the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s securities with unrealized losses aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.

AFS securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and more than twelve months are as follows (in thousands):

The Company is required to conduct an impairment evaluation on AFS securities to determine whether the Company has the intent to sell the security or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery. If these situations apply, the guidance requires the Company to reduce the security’s amortized cost basis down to its fair value through earnings. The Company also evaluates the unrealized losses on AFS securities to determine if a security’s decline in fair value below its amortized cost basis is due to credit factors. The evaluation is based upon factors such as the creditworthiness of the underlying borrowers, performance of the underlying collateral, if applicable, and the level of credit support in the security structure. Management also evaluates other factors and circumstances that may be indicative of a decline in the fair value of the security due to a credit factor.

This includes, but is not limited to, an evaluation of the type of security, length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, and near-term prospects of the issuer. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of the expected cash flows of the security is compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. If the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis under the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) standard, and declines due to non-credit factors are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”), net of taxes. If a credit loss is recognized in earnings, subsequent improvements to the expectation of collectability will be recognized through the ACL. If the fair value of the security increases above its amortized cost, the unrealized gain will be recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company didnot record an ACL on the AFS securities as of June 30, 2025, or December 31, 2024. The Company considers the unrealized losses on the AFS securities to be related to fluctuations in market conditions, primarily interest rates, and not reflective of deterioration in credit. The Company had 528 securities in an unrealized loss position as of June 30, 2025. The Company has evaluated AFS securities in an unrealized loss position for credit-related impairment at June 30, 2025, and concludedno impairment existed based on a combination of factors, which included: (1) the securities are of high credit quality, (2) unrealized losses are primarily the result of market volatility and increases in market interest rates, (3) the contractual terms of the investments do not permit the issuer(s) to settle the securities at a price less than the par value of each investment, (4) issuers continue to make timely principal and interest payments, and (5) the Company does not intend to sell any of the investments and the accounting standard of “more likely than not” has not been met for the Company to be required to sell any of the investments before recovery of its amortized cost basis. As such, there wasno ACL on AFS securities at June 30, 2025.

Securities of U.S. Treasury and Federal Agencies and Federal Agency Mortgage (Residential and Commercial) Backed Securities

At June 30, 2025, the unrealized losses associated with 11 U.S. Treasuries and Government Agency securities,12 Residential Mortgage Backed – Agency securities, and 14 Commercial Mortgage Backed – Agency securities were generally driven by changes in interest rates and not due to credit losses given the explicit or implicit guarantees provided by the U.S. government. Therefore, the Company has concluded that the unrealized losses for these securities do not require an ACL at June 30, 2025.

Securities of U.S. States and Municipalities

At June 30, 2025, the unrealized losses associated with 386 State and Municipal securities were primarily caused by changes in interest rates and not the credit quality of the securities. These securities are investment grade and were generally underwritten in accordance with our own investment standards prior to the decision to purchase, without relying on a bond insurer’s guarantee in making the investment decision. These securities will continue to be monitored as part of our ongoing impairment analysis but are expected to perform, even if the rating agencies reduce the credit rating of the bond insurers. As a result, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. Therefore, the Company has concluded that the unrealized losses for these securities do not require an ACL at June 30, 2025.

Residential & Commercial Mortgage Backed – Non-Agency Securities

At June 30, 2025, the unrealized losses associated with 61 Residential Mortgage Backed – Non-Agency securities and 16 Commercial Mortgage Backed – Non-Agency securities were generally driven by changes in interest rates, credit spreads, and projected collateral losses. We assess for credit impairment by estimating the present value of expected cash flows. The key assumptions for determining expected cash flows include default rates, loss severities, and/or prepayment rates. Based on our assessment of the expected credit losses and the credit enhancement level of the securities, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost of these securities. Therefore, the Company has concluded that the unrealized losses for these securities do not require an ACL at June 30, 2025.

Asset-Backed Securities

At June 30, 2025, the unrealized losses associated with 20 Asset-Backed securities were generally driven by changes in interest rates, credit spreads, and projected collateral losses. We assess for credit impairment by estimating the present value of expected cash flows. The key assumptions for determining expected cash flows include default rates, loss severities, and/or prepayment rates. Based on our assessment of the expected credit losses and the credit enhancement level of the securities, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost of these securities. Therefore, the Company has concluded that the unrealized losses for these securities do not require an ACL at June 30, 2025.

Other Securities

At June 30, 2025, the unrealized losses associated with 8 securities were primarily driven by interest rates and not the credit quality of the securities. These investments were underwritten in accordance with our own investment standards prior to the decision to purchase, without relying on a bond insurer’s guarantee in making the investment decision. Based on our assessment of the expected credit losses, we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the securities. Therefore, the Company has concluded that the unrealized losses for these securities do not require an ACL at June 30, 2025.

Restricted stock, at cost

The Company’s investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock totaled $26.8 million and $18.2 million at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. The Company’s investment in Federal Reserve Bank stock totaled $14.8 million and $14.8 million at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. FHLB and Federal Reserve stock are generally viewed as long-term investments and as restricted investment securities, which are carried at cost, because there is no market for the stocks other than member institutions. Therefore, when evaluating FHLB and Federal Reserve stock for impairment, their values are based on the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than by recognizing temporary declines in value. The Company does not consider these investments to be impaired at June 30, 2025, and no impairment has been recognized. FHLB stock and Federal Reserve stock are included in a separate line item, restricted stock, at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are not part of the Company’s AFS securities portfolio.

The Company’s restricted stock line item on the Consolidated Balance Sheets also includes an investment in Community Bankers’ Bank, totaling $111 thousand at June 30, 2025, and $111 thousand at December 31, 2024, which is carried at cost and is not impaired at June 30, 2025. The Company also has other restricted investments including Independent Community Bancorp, Inc. and WV Bankers Title which are included in restricted stock on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2025 and December 31, 2024.

Note 3—Loans

The Company’s loan portfolio segments, as reported in the tables below, include (i) commercial real estate, (ii) owner-occupied commercial real estate, (iii) acquisition, construction & development, (iv) commercial & industrial, (v) single family residential (1-4 units), and (vi) consumer non-real estate and other. The risks associated with lending activities differ among the various loan segments and are subject to the impact of changes in interest rates, market conditions of collateral securing the loans, and general economic conditions.

•Commercial real estate loans carry risk associated with either the net operating income generated from the lease of the real estate collateral or income generated from the sale of the collateral. Other risk factors include the credit-worthiness of the sponsor and the value of the collateral.

•Owner-occupied commercial real estate loans carry risk associated with the operations of the business that occupies the property and the value of the collateral.

•Acquisition, construction & development loans carry risk associated with the credit-worthiness of the borrower, project completion within budget, sale after completion, and the value of the collateral.

•Commercial & industrial loans carry the risk associated with the operations of the business and the value of the collateral, if any.

•Single family residential (1-4 units) loans for consumer purposes carry risk associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and the value of the collateral. Single family residential (1-4 units) loans for investment purpose carry risk associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower, the value of the collateral, and either the net operating income generated from the lease of the real estate collateral or income generated from the sale of the collateral.

•Consumer non-real estate and other loans, which includes overdrafts, carry risk associated with the credit-worthiness of the borrower and the value of the collateral, if any.

Note 3— Loans (continued)

Loan balances as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, by portfolio segment were as follows (in thousands):

Net deferred loan fees included in the above loan categories totaled $4.9 million and $4.4 million at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Note 4—Allowance for Credit Losses

The Company’s ACL is calculated quarterly, with any adjustment recorded to the provision for credit losses in the Consolidated Statement of Income. Management calculates the quantitative portion of collectively evaluated loans for all loan categories using the weighted average remaining maturity (“WARM”) method. For purposes of estimating the Company’s ACL, management generally evaluates collectively evaluated loans by federal call code in order to group loans with similar risk characteristics.

Loans that do not share similar risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual loan basis and are excluded from the collective evaluation for the ACL. Loans identified to be individually evaluated under CECL include loans on non-accrual status and may include accruing loans that do not share similar risk characteristics to other accruing loans that are collectively evaluated on a loan pool basis. A specific reserve analysis may be applied to the individually evaluated loans, which considers collateral value, an observable market price, or the present value of the expected future cash flows. A specific reserve is assigned if the measured value of the loan using one of the before mentioned methods is less than the carrying value of the loan.

Based on management’s analysis, adjustments may be applied for additional factors impacting the risk of loss in the loan portfolio beyond the information that is used to calculate a reasonable and supportable forecast and a reversion period forecast on collectively evaluated loans. Management may consider an additional or reduced reserve as warranted through qualitative risk factors based on the current and expected conditions as measured in supplemental information relative to the macroeconomic variable loss drivers used to calculate a reasonable and supportable forecast and a reversion period forecast. These qualitative risk factors considered by management are largely comparable to legacy factors prior to the adoption of CECL.

The following tables present the activity in the ACL for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, including the impact of the allowance established for Purchase Credit Deteriorated (“PCD”) loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, (in thousands).

The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable due to immateriality. The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, by portfolio segment (in thousands):

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, current economic information, and other factors. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans by credit risk. The Company internally grades all commercial loans at the time of origination. In addition, the Company performs an annual review on at least 50% of the Bank’s commercial credit exposure to each borrower. The Company uses the following definitions for credit risk classifications:

Pass: These include satisfactory loans that have acceptable levels of risk.

Special Mention: Loans classified as special mention have a potential credit weakness that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution’s credit position at some future date.

Substandard: Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of debt. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by sound net worth, payment capacity of the borrower, or of the collateral pledged. If weaknesses go uncorrected, there is potential for partial loss of principal and/or interest.

Doubtful: Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and unlikely.

Loss: Loans classified as a loss are considered to be uncollectible and cannot be justified to continue as viable assets. While there may be the possibility of some recovery in the future, it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off these loans at the present time.

The Company has a portfolio of smaller homogenous loans that are not individually risk rated that are included within the single family residential and consumer non-real estate and other loan classes. Generally, these loan classes are rated as “Pass” unless these loans are on non-accrual and are then classified as substandard.

The following table presents the amortized cost basis of the loan portfolio, by year of origination, loan class, and credit quality, as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

The following tables present information about collateral-dependent loans that were individually evaluated for purposes of determining the ACL as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Purchased Credit Deteriorated Loans

The Company has purchased loans for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of more than insignificant deterioration of credit quality since origination. The carrying amount of those loans, at acquisition, is as follows (in thousands):

Loan Modifications

On January 1, 2023, the Company adopted ASU 2022-02 on a modified retrospective basis. ASU 2022-02 eliminates the troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) accounting model and requires that the Company evaluate, based on the accounting for loan modifications, whether the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, and the modification results in a more-than-insignificant direct change in the contractual cash flows and represents a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. This change required all loan modifications to be accounted for under the general loan modification guidance in ASC 310-20, Receivables — Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs, and subjects entities to new disclosure requirements on loan modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty.

The Company may modify loans to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty by providing principal forgiveness, term extension, interest rate reduction, or an other-than-insignificant payment delay. When principal forgiveness is provided, the amount of forgiveness is charged off against the ACL. The Company may also provide multiple types of modifications on an individual loan. For the six months ended June 30, 2025, and for the year ended, December 31, 2024, the Company did not extend any modifications to borrowers experiencing financial difficulty that had a more-than-insignificant direct change in the contractual cash flows of the loan.

Other Real Estate Owned

Real estate owned activity was as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and for the year ended, December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Note 5—Deposits

The aggregate amount of time deposits that meet or exceed the FDIC Insurance Limit of $250,000, was approximately $289.7 million and $284.4 million on June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. Brokered time deposits, which are fully insured, totaled $132.1 million and $244.8 million as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. Time deposits through the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) program totaled $28.1 million at June 30, 2025, compared to $35.7 million at December 31, 2024.

Note 5— Deposits (continued)

The remaining maturities of time deposits as of June 30, 2025 are as follows (in thousands):

At June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, amounts included in time deposits for individual retirement accounts totaled $116.2 million and $118.9 million, respectively.

Overdrafts of $730.0 thousand and $1.6 million were reclassified to loans as of June 30, 2025, and the year ended December 31, 2024, respectively.

Note 6—Borrowed Funds

Short-term borrowings

The Company had borrowings of $650.0 million and $365.0 million at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively. At June 30, 2025, the interest rate on this debt ranged from 4.40% to 4.50%. At December 31, 2024, the interest rate on this debt ranged from 4.43% to 4.57%. The average balance outstanding during the six months ending June 30, 2025, and the year ending December 31, 2024, was $393.8 million and $422.5 million, respectively. The Company has a finance lease liability that is not included in these balances - see Note 7 - Leased Property for a discussion of this liability that is included in the accrued interest and other liabilities line in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company has available secured lines of credit with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, such as the Borrower-In-Custody program, the FHLB of Atlanta, and unsecured federal funds lines of credit from correspondent banking relationships. Through these sources, the Company has unused capacity of $4.1 billion in remaining borrowing capacity as of June 30, 2025. The advances on credit lines are secured by both securities and loans. The lendable collateral value of securities and loans pledged against available lines of credit as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, was $3.2 billion and $3.1 billion, respectively. As of June 30, 2025, all of the Company’s borrowings will mature within one calendar year.

The contractual maturities of these borrowings, which all occur within one year of the reporting date, are as follows as of June 30, 2025, (in thousands):

Long-term borrowings

Subordinated Debentures

As part of the Merger, Burke & Herbert assumed $75.0 million of subordinated debentures, that were fair valued at $61.5 million with a $13.5 million discount being amortized into interest expense over the stated maturity. As of June 30, 2025, the net balance was $67.6 million. The subordinated debt qualifies as Tier 2 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines, until the debt is within 5 years of its maturity; thereafter, the amount qualifying as Tier 2 capital is reduced 20% each year until maturity. The subordinated debentures were issued in the fourth quarter of 2021. This subordinated debt bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.25% per year, from acquisition date to, but excluding, December 1, 2026, payable semi-annually in arrears. From and including, December 1, 2026 to, but excluding, the maturity date or earlier redemption date, the interest rate will reset quarterly at a variable rate equal to the then current three-month term Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”), as published by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, plus 230 basis points, payable quarterly

Note 6— Borrowed Funds (continued)

in arrears. This debt has a 10-year term, and generally, is not prepayable by us within the first 5 years from issuance, which was fourth quarter 2021.

Through the Merger, Burke & Herbert also assumed $30 million of subordinated debentures that were fair valued at $29.8 million with a $0.2 million discount being amortized into interest expense over the stated maturity. As of June 30, 2025, the net balance was $30 million. The subordinated debt qualifies as Tier 2 capital under Federal Reserve Board guidelines, until the debt is within 5 years of its maturity; thereafter, the amount qualifying as Tier 2 capital is reduced by 20% each year until its maturity. The subordinated debentures were issued in the third quarter of 2020. This subordinated debt bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.00% per year from the date of assumption to, but excluding, September 30, 2025, payable quarterly in arrears. From and including September 30, 2025, to, but excluding, the maturity date or earlier redemption date, the interest rate will reset quarterly at a variable rate equal to the then current three-month term SOFR plus 487 basis points, payable quarterly in arrears. This debt has a 10-year term, and generally, is not prepayable by us within the first 5 years from issuance, which was third quarter 2020.

Subordinated Debentures Owed to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts

As part of the Merger, Burke & Herbert became the sponsor for SFG Capital Trust I, SFG Capital Trust II, and SFG Capital Trust III. For each of these trusts,100% of the common equity is owned by us. SFG Capital Trust I issued $3.5 million in capital securities and $109 thousand in common securities and invested the proceeds in $3.6 million of debentures, which were assumed by Burke & Herbert in the Merger. SFG Capital Trust II issued $7.5 million in capital securities and $232 thousand in common securities and invested the proceeds in $7.7 million of debentures, which were assumed by Burke & Herbert in the Merger. SFG Capital Trust III issued $8.0 million in capital securities and $248 thousand in common securities and invested the proceeds in $8.3 million of debentures, which were assumed by Burke & Herbert in the Merger. Distributions on the capital securities issued by the trusts are payable quarterly at a variable rate equal to 3 month LIBOR plus 345 basis points for SFG Capital Trust I, 3 months of LIBOR plus 280 basis points for SFG Capital Trust II, and 3 month LIBOR plus 145 basis points for SFG Capital Trust III, and equals the interest rate earned on the debentures held by the trusts and is recorded as interest expense by us. The capital securities are subject to mandatory redemption in whole, or in part, upon repayment of the debentures. We have entered into agreements which, taken collectively, fully and unconditionally guarantee the capital securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. The debentures of each Capital Trust are redeemable by us quarterly.

The capital securities issued by SFG Capital Trust I, SFG Capital Trust II, and SFG Capital Trust III qualify as Tier 1 capital under the Federal Reserve guidelines. In accordance with these Guidelines, trust preferred securities are limited to 25% of Tier 1 capital elements, net of goodwill. The amount of trust preferred securities and certain other elements in excess of the limit can be included in Tier 2 capital.

The remaining maturities of subordinated debentures as of June 30, 2025, are as follows (in thousands):

Note 7—Leased Property

Lessor Arrangements

The Company enters into operating leases with customers to lease vacant space in certain owned premises that is not being used by the Company. These operating leases are typically payable in monthly installments with terms ranging from aroundone year to aroundten years and may contain renewal options. The components of lease income, which were included in non-interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income, were as follows (in thousands):

Note 7— Leased Property (continued)

The remaining maturities of operating lease receivables as of June 30, 2025, are as follows (in thousands):

Lessee Arrangements

The Company has entered into leases for branches and office space. The leases are evaluated for whether the lease will be classified as either a finance or operating lease. Certain leases offer the option to extend the lease term, and the Company has included such extensions in its calculation of the lease liabilities to the extent the options are reasonably assured of being exercised. Including renewal options, the terms of the Company’s leases range from less thanone year to approximately twelve years. The lease agreements do not provide for residual value guarantees and have no restrictions or covenants that would impact dividends or require incurring additional financial obligations.

Lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments and are presented at each reporting date as the net present value of the remaining contractual cash flows. These cash flows are discounted at the Company’s incremental borrowing rate in effect at the commencement date of the lease. The right-of-use asset and lease liability are included in other assets and other liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Right-of-use assets and liabilities by lease type, and the associated balance sheet classifications are as follows (in thousands):

The components of total lease cost were as follows (in thousands):

Note 7— Leased Property (continued)

The Company’s future undiscounted lease payments for finance and operating leases with initial terms of one year or more as of June 30, 2025, are as follows (in thousands):

The following table presents additional information about the Company’s leases as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024.

Note 8—Regulatory Capital Matters

Banks and financial holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, “prompt corrective action” regulations involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Under the Basel III Framework, an entity must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The net unrealized gain or loss on AFS securities is not included in computing regulatory capital. Management believes as of June 30, 2025, the Company and the Bank meet all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject.

“Prompt corrective action” regulations provide five classifications: “well capitalized”, “adequately capitalized”, “undercapitalized”, “significantly undercapitalized”, and “critically undercapitalized”, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If “adequately capitalized”, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If “undercapitalized”, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required. As of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, the most recent notification from the FDIC categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under the regulatory framework for “prompt corrective action.”

Note 8— Regulatory Capital Matters (continued)

The following table presents the actual and required capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (in thousands except for ratios):

The Company’s principal source of funds for dividend payments is dividends received from the Bank. Banking regulations limit the amount of dividends that may be paid without prior approval of regulatory agencies. As of June 30, 2025, approximately $293.6 million of retained earnings was available for dividend declaration consistent with the Company’s capital plan.

Note 9—Derivatives

The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of its asset liability management strategy to help manage its interest rate risk position. The notional amount of the interest rate swaps does not represent amounts exchanged by the parties. The amount exchanged is determined by reference to the notional amount and the other terms of the individual interest rate swap agreements.

Cash flow hedges of interest rate risk

The Company’s objective in using interest rate derivatives is to add stability to net interest income and to manage its exposure to interest rate movements. To accomplish this objective, the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps, caps, and floors as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. Interest rate swaps, designated as cash flow hedges, involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount. As of June 30, 2025, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable-rate liabilities. As of June 30, 2024, such derivatives were used to hedge the variable cash flows associated with variable-rate debt and variable-rate securities.

For derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in AOCI and subsequently reclassified into interest expense or interest income in the same period(s) during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. During the next twelve months, the Company estimates that an additional $514.6 thousand will be reclassified as a reduction to interest expense.

Derivatives not designated as hedges

The Company enters into interest rate swaps with its loan customers to facilitate their financing requests. Upon entering into swaps with our loan customers, the Company will enter into corresponding offsetting derivatives with third parties. These derivatives represent economic hedges and do not qualify as hedges for accounting. These back-to-back interest rate swaps are reported at fair value in other assets and accrued interest and other liabilities in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in the fair value of interest rate swaps are recorded in other non-interest expense and sum tozero because of offsetting terms of swaps with borrowers and swaps with dealer counterparties.

The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments, which includes accrued interest, as well as their classification on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

The table below presents the effect of cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 (in thousands):

The table below presents the effect of cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 (in thousands):

The table below presents the effect of the Company’s derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 (in thousands).

(1) The Company voluntarily discontinued a fair value hedging relationship and these amounts include the gain or (loss) and the hedging adjustment on a voluntary discontinued hedging relationship. The Company has allocated the basis adjustment to the remaining individual assets in the closed portfolio and will amortize the basis adjustment over a period consistent with amortization of other discounts or premiums on the assets.

Credit-risk-related Contingent Features

As of June 30, 2025, the fair value of derivatives in a liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for non-performance risk related to these agreements, was $0.2 million. As of December 31, 2024, the fair value of derivatives in a net liability position, which includes accrued interest but excludes any adjustment for non-performance risk related to these agreements, was $0.2 million. As of June 30, 2025, and as of December 31, 2024, the Company has posted the full amount of collateral related to these agreements.

Note 10—Commitments and Contingencies

Credit extension commitments

The Company’s financial statements do not reflect various financial instruments which arise in the normal course of business and which involve elements of credit risk, interest rate risk, and liquidity risk. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit (e.g., revolving lines of credit) and commercial letters of credit.

Many of our lending relationships contain both funded and unfunded elements. The funded portion is reflected on our balance sheet. The unfunded portion of these commitments is not recorded on our balance sheet until a draw is made under the loan facility. Since many of our commitments to extend credit may expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements.

A summary of the contractual amounts of the Company’s financial instruments outstanding at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, is as follows (in thousands):

Commitments to extend credit and commercial letters of credit both include exposure to some credit loss in the event of non-performance of the customer. The Company’s credit policies and procedures for credit commitments and financial guarantees are the same as those for extensions of credit that are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Many of these instruments have fixed maturity dates, and many of them will expire without being drawn upon; accordingly, they do not generally present any significant liquidity risk to the Company.

Allowance for credit losses - off-balance-sheet credit exposures

The Company recorded a recapture of credit losses on unfunded commitments of $93.0 thousand and provision for credit losses of $3.8 million on unfunded commitments for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. The Company recorded a recapture of credit losses on unfunded commitments of $492.0 thousand and a provision for credit losses of $3.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. The ACL on off-balance-sheet credit totaled $3.5 million and $4.0 million as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, and is included in accrued interest and other liabilities on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Litigation

The Company is a party to litigation, claims, and proceedings arising in the normal course of business that are ordinary and routine to the nature of the Company’s business and operations. Management, after consultation with legal counsel, believes that the liabilities, if any, arising from any currently pending or threatened litigation, claims, or proceedings will not be material to the Company’s financial position as of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, respectively.

Note 11—Fair Value Measurements

Determination of Fair Value

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair values:

Level 1– Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

Level 2– Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3– Significant unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

In instances in which multiple levels of inputs are used to measure fair value, hierarchy classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

Investment securities

The fair values for investment securities are determined by quoted market prices, if available (Level 1). For securities where quoted prices are not available, fair values are calculated based on market prices of similar securities (Level 2), using matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique commonly used to price debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). For securities where quoted prices or market prices of similar securities are not available, fair values are calculated using discounted cash flows or other market indicators (Level 3).

Equity Investments

Equity investments are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis, with changes in fair value reported in net income. Through the Merger, at June 30, 2025, we acquired an investment in an S&P 500 index mutual fund that is traded on an exchange, and we classify it as Level 2.

Through the Merger, we acquired perpetual preferred stock of a bank holding company issued in October 2022 in a private offering. The perpetual preferred stock does not trade on an exchange or in an active over-the-counter market; therefore, we estimate its fair value using the present value of its future cash flows using observed discount rates of similar publicly-traded securities, adjusted for a liquidity premium. We classify the perpetual preferred stock as Level 2.

Equity securities without readily determinable fair values are carried at cost, minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for an identical or similar investment. Such equity securities are included in other assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Derivatives

The fair values of derivatives are based on valuation models using observable market data as of the measurement date (Level 2). The Company has contracted with a third-party vendor to provide valuations for interest rate swaps using standard swap valuation techniques. The Company has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.

Loans held-for-sale

The fair value of loans held-for-sale is determined using quoted prices for similar assets, adjusted for specific attributes of that loan (Level 2). These loans currently consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below (in thousands):

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain assets recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis in the financial statements:

Collateral dependent loans

Loans for which the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and repayment is dependent upon the operation or sale of collateral, are considered collateral-dependent. For collateral-dependent loans, the fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loans, less estimated costs of disposal. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets, including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans is real estate, the fair value of which is measured through an appraisal. The appraisals of the collateral supporting collateral-dependent loans may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches, including comparable sales and the income approach. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for (recapture of) credit losses on the Consolidated Statements of Income. Non-real estate collateral may be valued using an appraisal, net book value per the borrower’s financial statements, or aging reports, adjusted or discounted based on management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of the valuation, and management’s expertise and knowledge of the client and client’s business.

Other real estate owned

Assets acquired through foreclosure or other proceedings are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. The fair value of foreclosed properties is determined on a nonrecurring basis generally utilizing current appraisals performed by an independent, licensed appraiser applying an income or market value approach using observable market data. Updated appraisals of foreclosed properties are generally obtained if the existing appraisal is more than 18 months old or more frequently if there is a known deterioration in value. However, if a current appraisal is not available, the original appraised value is discounted, as appropriate, to compensate for the estimated depreciation in the value of the real estate since the date of its original appraisal. Such discounts are generally estimated based upon management’s knowledge of sales of similar property within the applicable market area and its knowledge of other real estate market-related data as well as general economic trends. Upon foreclosure, any fair value adjustment is charged against the allowance for credit losses on loans. Subsequent fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred and included in other noninterest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Assets that were measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the period are summarized below (in thousands):

The following table presents quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements for assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024 (in thousands except for percentages):

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments not carried at fair value, at June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, were as follows (in thousands):

Note 12—Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 (in thousands):

Note 12— Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) (continued)

The following table presents amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024 (in thousands).

Note 13—Other Operating Expense

Other operating expense from the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, is as follows (in thousands):

The Company incurred Merger-related expenses ofzero and $9.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively. These expenses are included in the consultant fees, audit fees, legal expense, donation, and other line items detailed in other operating expenses.

Note 14—Share-Based Compensation

The Company has a share-based incentive plan described below that allows it to offer a variety of equity compensation awards subject to approval. Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for the share-based awards granted was $1.5 million and $937.6 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. The total income tax benefit was $310.4 thousand and $196.9 thousand for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively.

Total compensation cost that has been charged against income for the share-based awards granted was $2.4 million and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively. The total income tax benefit was $499.5 thousand and $291.5 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively.

2019 Stock Incentive Plan

In 2019, the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan (“2019 SIP”) was approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors (the “Bank Board”). The 2019 SIP provides for the issuance of share-based awards to directors and employees of the Company. The 2019 SIP authorized 240,000 units to be issued, and the Company’s practice is using authorized unissued shares to satisfy these share-based awards. Each unit represents a contingent right to receiveone common share or an equivalent amount of cash, or a combination of the two, at the discretion of the Company. Currently, we have a sufficient number of authorized unissued shares to satisfy all outstanding equity awards.

Under the 2019 SIP, the Company has issued restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awards that are both time-based and performance-based. Each RSU award will indicate the number of shares, the conditions (e.g., service, performance, and/or a combination), and the grant date. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the award at grant date.

Note 14— Share-Based Compensation (continued)

2023 Stock Incentive Plan

In 2023, a new stock incentive plan (“2023 SIP”) was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”) and shareholders. Upon the plan’s shareholder approval date of March 30, 2023, no further share-based awards will be issued under the 2019 SIP. The 2023 SIP provides for the issuance of share-based awards to directors and employees of the Company. The 2023 SIP authorized the issuance of 250,000 shares, subject to an annual increase in available shares and shares and shares recycled from the 2019 SIP that were cancelled. Based on our shares outstanding as of June 30, 2025, and awards that were recycled from the 2019 SIP, the total shares authorized for issuance under the plan as of June 30, 2025 was 324,887.

A total of 96,132 and 48,450 shares were issued during the six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively.

For time-based RSUs, the fair value was determined by using the closing stock price on the date prior to the grant date. These RSUs vest over three tofive years.

The Board, from time to time, approves performance-based RSU awards that may be earned between athree tofive year performance period. Whether or not units are earned at the end of the performance period will be determined based on the achievement of performance and/or market targets (e.g., market capitalization target) over the performance period. If the conditions are achieved, the grant recipient will receive 100% of the units granted as these awards do not provide for a multiplier effect. The performance/market targets are determined by the Board.

The fair value for performance-based RSU awards was determined by using a Monte Carlo simulation analysis to estimate the achievement of the market capitalization target determined by the Board. The Monte Carlo simulation analysis required the following inputs: (1) expected term, (2) expected volatility, (3) risk-free rate, and (4) dividend yield. The expected term was based on the stated performance period. Management used the expected volatility from a peer group. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve over the performance period. The dividend yield assumption was based on historical and anticipated dividend payouts.

The following is a summary of all the Company’s RSU awards issued under both the 2019 SIP and 2023 SIP:

As of June 30, 2025, there was $7.8 million of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested shares granted under both the 2019 SIP and 2023 SIP. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.48 years.

2023 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

In 2023, an employee stock purchase plan (“2023 ESPP”) was approved by the Board and shareholders. Upon the 2023 ESPP’s shareholder approval date of March 30, 2023, the 2023 ESPP reserved 250,000 shares of common stock for issuance to employees, subject to an annual increase in reserved shares. At June 30, 2025,305,210 shares were available to be issued. Whole shares are sold to participants in the 2023 ESPP at 85% of the lower of the stock price at the beginning or end of each semi-annual offering period. The first semi-annual offering period began on September 1, 2023, and the current semi-annual offering period began on March 1, 2025. Eligible employees may purchase shares in an amount that does not exceed the lesser of the IRS limit of $25,000 or 15% of their annual salary.

Note 14— Share-Based Compensation (continued)

The following table presents information for the 2023 ESPP for the six months ended June 30, 2025:

Stock Appreciation Rights (“SARs”)

Upon completion of the Merger and as a part of the Merger Agreement, Burke & Herbert assumed SAR awards that had been issued to existing employees that would continue with the same terms and conditions adjusted for the exchange ratio of 0.5043. As part of the Merger, a significant portion of SAR awards accelerated their vesting and thus did not require any future service component. Management used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to fair value these accelerated SAR awards and included this value as part of the purchase price consideration discussed in Note 16 - Business Combination.

The Company also used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to fair value the non-accelerated SAR awards that were not fully vested. The SAR awards that have been assumed by the Company, were issued in 2019, 2021, and 2023, and these SAR awards become exercisable ratably over seven years (14.3% per year) and contractually expireten years after the grant date.

Upon completion of the Merger, the Company determined the fair value per SAR using the following assumptions:

A summary of SAR and option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2025, is as follows:

The total fair value of SARs exercised was $657.0 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2025. The total fair value of SARs vested was $78.0 thousand during the six months ended June 30, 2025. As of June 30, 2025, there was $383.2 thousand of total unrecognized compensation costs related to non-vested SARs acquired through the Merger. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.13 years.

Note 15—Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share excludes dilution and is computed by dividing net income applicable to common shares by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential impact of contingently issuable shares. The Company uses the treasury stock method as described by ASC 260 -Earnings Per Share for each dilutive instrument when computing diluted earnings per share.

The following shows the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect of weighted average number of shares dilutive potential common stock. Dilutive potential common stock has no effect on income available to common shareholders.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2024, the options effect of dilutive shares is anti-dilutive and not considered in calculating diluted EPS. Stock awards equivalent to 37,255 and 323,902 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per common share for the three months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, respectively, because they are antidilutive. Stock awards equivalent to 44,598 and 329,572 shares of common stock were not considered in computing diluted earnings per share for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and June 30, 2024, respectively, because they are antidilutive.

Note 16—Business Combination

Effective on May 3, 2024, Burke & Herbert completed the Merger with Summit, pursuant to the Merger Agreement.

In the Merger, holders of Summit common stock outstanding at the effective time of the Merger received 0.5043 shares of Burke & Herbert common stock for each share of Summit common stock they owned, subject to the payment of cash in lieu of fractional shares. The total aggregate consideration payable in the Merger was approximately 7,405,772 shares of Burke & Herbert common stock. Additionally, each share of Summit’s 6.0% Fixed Rate Non-Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series 2021 issued and outstanding was converted into the right to receive a share of Burke & Herbert Series 2021 Preferred Stock.

We accounted for the Merger using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Summit were recorded at their respective fair values on the date of completion of the Merger. We recognized goodwill of $34.1 million in connection with the acquisition, which is not amortized for financial reporting purposes, but is subject to annual impairment testing. The goodwill arising from the transaction isnot deductible for tax purposes and consisted largely of synergies and the cost savings resulting from the combining of the operations of the companies. The fair values of assets and liabilities are subject to refinement for up to one year after the acquisition date if any additional information relative to the acquisition date fair values becomes available. This one year period expired during the quarter ending June 30, 2025. The following table summarizes adjustments to goodwill subsequent to December 31, 2024 (in thousands):

Note 16— Business Combination (continued)

The adjustment to goodwill resulted in additional review of deferred tax asset and other compensation plan estimates that were established during the Merger and disclosed in the tables below.

The core deposit intangible represents the value of long-term deposit relationships acquired in this transaction and will be amortized over an estimated weighted average life of 7 years using an accelerated method which approximates the estimated run-off of the acquired deposits. The fair value of intangible assets related to core deposits was $68.8 million on the date of acquisition.

The fair value of purchased financial assets with credit deterioration was $380.8 million on the date of the acquisition. The gross contractual amounts receivable relating to the purchased financial assets with credit deterioration was $442.3 million. After the Merger, all of the securities, held-to-maturity, were reclassified as available-for-sale.

The following table details the total consideration paid for Summit on May 3, 2024, the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and the resulting goodwill at the acquisition date.

Note 16— Business Combination (continued)

Note 17—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table presents the change in goodwill for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, (in thousands):

During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded $32.8 million of goodwill associated with the acquisition of Summit. See Note 16 - Business Combination to the consolidated financial statements for additional detail regarding this transaction.

The Company performs the annual goodwill impairment test on September 30 every year.

Other intangible assets consist of the core deposit intangible which is being amortized on an accelerated basis over its estimated useful life of 7 years. During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company recorded $68.8 million of core deposit intangibles associated with the acquisition of Summit.

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, and June 30, 2024, was as follows (in thousands):

The Company reviews other intangible assets for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. Total amortization expense associated with intangible assets was $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2025.

Estimated amortization expense for future years is as follows (in thousands):

Note 18—Segment Information

Segment performance is evaluated using consolidated net income. The Company operates inone segment – Community Banking and the financial performance of thisone segment is used to make resource allocations and performance decisions. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer is in charge of allocating the Company’s resources and assessing performance, and has been identified as the chief operating decision maker. While the chief decision-maker monitors the revenue streams of the various products and services, operations are managed and financial performance is evaluated on a Company-wide basis. Individual operating results are not reviewed by senior management to make resource allocation or performance decisions. Therefore, all of the financial service operations are considered by management to be aggregated inone reportable operating segment.