Solo Brands, Inc.

From time to time, we are, have been, and may become subject to arbitration, litigation or claims. The results of any current or future claims or proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of defense and litigation costs, diversion of management resources, reputational harm and other factors. Other than the below, the Company is not currently a party to any pending litigation that the Company considers material.

In January 2026, the Company filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade (“CIT”) challenging the legality of incremental tariffs and seeking a refund of incremental tariffs paid by the Company. To facilitate the administration of new cases that continue to be filed challenging the imposition of tariffs, the case was stayed pending the final outcome of V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States (“V.O.S”), which held that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”) does not authorize a U.S. President to impose tariffs, and the CIT’s determination of further proceedings. On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump (“Learning Resources”) holding that the IEEPA does not authorize a U.S. President to impose tariffs and that the challenge to the legality of the incremental tariffs was within the exclusive jurisdiction of the CIT, thus affirming the decision in V.O.S. Therefore, the outcome of the Company’s lawsuit at the CIT may determine our ability to recover the approximately $8 million in incremental tariffs that we paid in 2025, in addition to the incremental tariffs we have paid in 2026.