Constellation Energy Corp
For the period ended Sep 30, 2026. Filed Nov 9, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2026 · Filed Nov 9, 2026
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 2. Results of Operations
| Three Months Ended September 30, · $ Change · Nine Months Ended September 30, · $ Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 · 2025 · 2026 · 2025 | ||||||
| Operating revenues | $9,550 | $6,570 | $2,980 | $28,176 | $19,459 | $8,717 |
| Operating expenses | ||||||
| Purchased power and fuel | 4,400 | 3,567 | 833 | 14,775 | 11,083 | 3,692 |
| Operating and maintenance | 1,991 | 1,511 | 480 | 6,024 | 4,673 | 1,351 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 454 | 241 | 213 | 1,340 | 743 | 597 |
| Taxes other than income taxes | 225 | 165 | 60 | 661 | 472 | 189 |
| Total operating expenses | 7,070 | 5,484 | 1,586 | 22,800 | 16,971 | 5,829 |
| Gain (loss) on sales of assets | 12 | — | 12 | 28 | — | 28 |
| Operating income (loss) | 2,492 | 1,086 | 1,406 | 5,404 | 2,488 | 2,916 |
| Other income and (deductions) | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | (217) | (134) | (83) | (753) | (398) | (355) |
| Other, net | (44) | 443 | (487) | 605 | 729 | (124) |
| Total other income and (deductions) | (261) | 309 | (570) | (148) | 331 | (479) |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 2,231 | 1,395 | 836 | 5,256 | 2,819 | 2,437 |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | 405 | 466 | (61) | 1,333 | 928 | 405 |
| Equity in income (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | 9 | — | 9 | 23 | — | 23 |
| Net income (loss) | 1,835 | 929 | 906 | 3,946 | 1,891 | 2,055 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | — | (1) | 1 | 8 | 4 | 4 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $1,835 | $930 | $905 | $3,938 | $1,887 | $2,051 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2026 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2025. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was favorable by $905 million primarily due to:
Addition of Calpine operations acquired in January 2026, inclusive of the impacts of purchase accounting. See Note 2 — Mergers, Acquisitions, and Dispositions of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information; and
Favorable net adjustments to deferred income taxes due to changes in forecasted apportionment.
The favorable items were partially offset by:
Unfavorable decommissioning-related activities; and
Lower Nuclear PTC revenues in 2026. See Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2026 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was favorable by $2,051 million primarily due to:
Addition of Calpine operations acquired in January 2026, inclusive of the impacts of purchase accounting. See Note 2 — Mergers, Acquisitions, and Dispositions of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information;
Favorable net market and portfolio conditions primarily driven by higher capacity revenues;
Lower net unrealized loss on equity investments;
Favorable net adjustments to deferred income taxes due to changes in forecasted apportionment; and
Favorable decommissioning-related activities primarily driven by the 2026 nuclear ARO updates. See Note 9 — Asset Retirement Obligations of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The favorable items were partially offset by:
Unfavorable Calpine merger and integration costs;
Unfavorable interest expense primarily driven by increased long-term debt outstanding; and
Unfavorable impacts from nuclear outages.
Operating revenues. Our six reportable segments are Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, New York, ERCOT, Other Power Regions, and Calpine. See Note 5 — Segment Information of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these reportable segments.
With the exception of Calpine's natural gas sales, which are included in the Calpine segment, wholesale and retail sales of natural gas, as well as sales of other energy-related products and sustainable solutions and other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations, are reported under Other and not allocated to a segment.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 2025, Operating revenues were as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $1,877 | $1,763 | $114 | 6.5% | $5,279 | $4,876 | $403 | 8.3% |
| Midwest | 1,562 | 1,390 | 172 | 12.4% | 4,862 | 4,317 | 545 | 12.6% |
| New York | 569 | 558 | 11 | 2.0% | 1,702 | 1,655 | 47 | 2.8% |
| ERCOT | 592 | 628 | (36) | (5.7)% | 1,408 | 1,489 | (81) | (5.4)% |
| Other Power Regions | 1,099 | 1,543 | (444) | (28.8)% | 3,551 | 4,277 | (726) | (17.0)% |
| Calpine | 3,384 | — | 3,384 | 100.0% | 7,926 | — | 7,926 | 100.0% |
| Total reportable segment revenues | 9,083 | 5,882 | 3,201 | 54.4% | 24,728 | 16,614 | 8,114 | 48.8% |
| Other | 829 | 844 | (15) | (1.8)% | 2,815 | 3,201 | (386) | (12.1)% |
| Unrealized gains (losses)(a) | (362) | (156) | (206) | (a) | 633 | (356) | 989 | (a) |
| Total Operating revenues | $9,550 | $6,570 | $2,980 | 45.4% | $28,176 | $19,459 | $8,717 | 44.8% |
(a)% Change in unrealized gains (losses) is not a meaningful measure.
Sales and Supply Sources. Our sales and supply volumes (GWhs) by segment are summarized below:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (GWhs) | 2026 | 2025 | Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | Change | % Change |
| Nuclear Generation(a) | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 13,659 | 13,665 | (6) | —% | 39,661 | 39,105 | 556 | 1.4% |
| Midwest | 24,333 | 23,644 | 689 | 2.9% | 70,420 | 71,000 | (580) | (0.8)% |
| New York | 6,177 | 6,671 | (494) | (7.4)% | 18,528 | 19,585 | (1,057) | (5.4)% |
| ERCOT | 2,508 | 2,497 | 11 | 0.4% | 6,896 | 7,541 | (645) | (8.6)% |
| Total Nuclear Generation | 46,677 | 46,477 | 200 | 0.4% | 135,505 | 137,231 | (1,726) | (1.3)% |
| Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables(a) | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 377 | 242 | 135 | 55.8% | 1,728 | 1,683 | 45 | 2.7% |
| Midwest | 156 | 141 | 15 | 10.6% | 773 | 785 | (12) | (1.5)% |
| ERCOT | 4,626 | 4,325 | 301 | 7.0% | 11,106 | 10,615 | 491 | 4.6% |
| Other Power Regions | 1,436 | 1,466 | (30) | (2.0)% | 4,287 | 4,556 | (269) | (5.9)% |
| Calpine | 38,387 | — | 38,387 | 100.0% | 89,797 | — | 89,797 | 100.0% |
| Total Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables | 44,982 | 6,174 | 38,808 | 628.6% | 107,691 | 17,639 | 90,052 | 510.5% |
| Purchased Power | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 4,953 | 5,416 | (463) | (8.5)% | 12,110 | 13,960 | (1,850) | (13.3)% |
| Midwest | 326 | 403 | (77) | (19.1)% | 1,137 | 1,366 | (229) | (16.8)% |
| ERCOT | 673 | 714 | (41) | (5.7)% | 1,999 | 2,209 | (210) | (9.5)% |
| Other Power Regions | 9,173 | 11,451 | (2,278) | (19.9)% | 26,669 | 32,295 | (5,626) | (17.4)% |
| Calpine | 1,890 | — | 1,890 | 100.0% | 6,707 | — | 6,707 | 100.0% |
| Total Purchased Power | 17,015 | 17,984 | (969) | (5.4)% | 48,622 | 49,830 | (1,208) | (2.4)% |
| Total Supply/Sales by Segment | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 18,989 | 19,323 | (334) | (1.7)% | 53,499 | 54,748 | (1,249) | (2.3)% |
| Midwest | 24,815 | 24,188 | 627 | 2.6% | 72,330 | 73,151 | (821) | (1.1)% |
| New York | 6,177 | 6,671 | (494) | (7.4)% | 18,528 | 19,585 | (1,057) | (5.4)% |
| ERCOT | 7,807 | 7,536 | 271 | 3.6% | 20,001 | 20,365 | (364) | (1.8)% |
| Other Power Regions | 10,609 | 12,917 | (2,308) | (17.9)% | 30,956 | 36,851 | (5,895) | (16.0)% |
| Calpine | 40,277 | — | 40,277 | 100.0% | 96,504 | — | 96,504 | 100.0% |
| Total Supply/Sales by Segment | 108,674 | 70,635 | 38,039 | 53.9% | 291,818 | 204,700 | 87,118 | 42.6% |
(a)Includes the proportionate share of output where we have an undivided ownership interest in jointly-owned generating plants.
Nuclear Fleet Capacity Factor. The following table presents nuclear fleet operating data for our plants that reflects our ownership percentage for stations operated by us and excludes Salem and STP, which are operated by PSEG and STPNOC, respectively. The nuclear fleet capacity factor presented in the table is defined as the ratio of the actual output of a unit (or combination of units) over a period of time to its output if the unit had operated at net monthly mean capacity for that time period. We consider capacity factor to be a useful measure to analyze the nuclear fleet performance between periods. We have included the analysis below as a complement to the financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. However, these measures are not a presentation defined under GAAP and may not be comparable to other companies’ presentations or be more useful than the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this report.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |
| Nuclear fleet capacity factor | 97.2% | 96.8% | 94.2% | 95.3% |
| Refueling outage days | 20 | 23 | 205 | 152 |
| Non-refueling outage days | 6 | 5 | 26 | 27 |
Equivalent Forced Outage Factor (Natural Gas, Oil, and Pumped-storage Hydro). As a result of our expanded fleet following the acquisition of Calpine in January 2026, we now consider EFOF to be a key operational metric beginning in 2026. EFOF represents the percentage for which a generating unit is not available due to forced outages and forced deratings in a given period. We consider EFOF to be a useful measure in analyzing the reliability and performance of our natural gas, oil, and pumped-storage hydro fleet. The EFOF for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 was 5.9%. This operational metric is being included as a complement to the financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. However, as an operational metric, it may not be calculated or presented in a manner comparable to similar metrics used by other companies.
Electricity Prices. As a producer and supplier of electricity, the price of electricity has a significant impact on our operating revenues and purchased power cost. We report the sale and purchase of electricity in the spot market on a net hourly basis in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense based on our net hourly position. We assess the net position by ISO/RTO across segments and, where applicable, by segment within the ISO/RTO. The price of electricity is impacted by several variables, including but not limited to, the price of fuels, generation resources in the geographic region, weather, ongoing competition, emerging technologies, as well as macroeconomic and regulatory factors. The following table presents an average day-ahead around-the-clock reference price ($/MWh) for the periods presented for zones/hubs in each ISO/RTO where we have significant activity. This does not reflect prices we ultimately realized.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/RTO | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change |
| PJM - PJM West | $69.97 | $46.77 | $23.20 | 49.6% | $72.84 | $47.63 | $25.21 | 52.9% |
| PJM - ComEd | 51.44 | 42.72 | 8.72 | 20.4% | 43.82 | 36.37 | 7.45 | 20.5% |
| NYISO - Central | 51.07 | 49.51 | 1.56 | 3.2% | 67.94 | 54.07 | 13.87 | 25.7% |
| ERCOT - North | 34.41 | 35.05 | (0.64) | (1.8)% | 34.88 | 33.06 | 1.82 | 5.5% |
| ERCOT - Houston | 36.05 | 35.90 | 0.15 | 0.4% | 35.74 | 34.86 | 0.88 | 2.5% |
| ISO-NE - Southeast Massachusetts | 54.05 | 50.43 | 3.62 | 7.2% | 73.68 | 65.16 | 8.52 | 13.1% |
| CAISO - NP15 | 43.18 | 41.35 | 1.83 | 4.4% | 29.82 | 36.31 | (6.49) | (17.9)% |
Capacity Prices. We participate in capacity auctions in each ISO/RTO where we have qualifying generating assets. We also incur capacity costs associated with load served, which are factored into customer sales prices. Capacity prices have a material impact on our operating revenues and purchased power and fuel expense. We report capacity on a net monthly basis in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense. We assess the net position by ISO/RTO across segments and, where applicable, by segment within the ISO/RTO. The following table presents the average capacity prices ($/MW Day) for each ISO/RTO in which we have significant activity. Prices reflect the weighted average prices for the various auction periods within the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025.
We also enter into bilateral capacity contracts at negotiated contract prices. These contracts primarily relate to resource adequacy in CAISO and have a material impact on our operating revenues. Negotiated contract prices from these bilateral contracts are not included in the table below.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ISO/RTO | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change |
| PJM - Eastern Mid-Atlantic Area Council | $329.17 | $269.92 | $59.25 | 22.0% | $296.25 | $149.74 | $146.51 | 97.8% |
| PJM - ComEd | 329.17 | 269.92 | 59.25 | 22.0% | 296.25 | 136.03 | 160.22 | 117.8% |
| NYISO - Rest of State | 162.67 | 193.33 | (30.66) | (15.9)% | 156.89 | 137.52 | 19.37 | 14.1% |
| ISO-NE - Rest of Pool(a) | 86.24 | 84.37 | 1.87 | 2.2% | 85.20 | 83.37 | 1.83 | 2.2% |
(a)We did not have significant activity at this zone for the three months ended September 30, 2025.
ZEC Prices. We are compensated through state programs for the emissions-free attributes of our nuclear generation. The following table includes the average ZEC reference prices ($/MWh) for each state and associated segment in which state programs have been enacted. Gross prices reflect the weighted average price for the various delivery periods within the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 and may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realized as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State (Segment)(a) | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change |
| New Jersey (Mid-Atlantic)(b) | $— | $— | $— | —% | $— | $10.00 | $(10.00) | (100.0)% |
| Illinois (Midwest) | 1.02 | 1.17 | (0.15) | (12.8)% | 1.10 | 5.73 | (4.63) | (80.8)% |
| New York (New York) | 14.76 | 14.76 | — | —% | 14.76 | 15.93 | (1.17) | (7.3)% |
(a)See ITEM 1. BUSINESS, Environmental Matters and Regulation of our 2025 Form 10-K for additional information on the plants receiving payments through state programs.
(b)The New Jersey ZEC program concluded in May 2025.
Illinois CMC Price. The price received (paid) for each CMC is determined by the IPA monthly by subtracting energy and capacity index prices from the bid price, which resulted in $33.43 per MWh for the period June 2024 through May 2025, $33.50 per MWh for the period June 2025 through May 2026, and $34.50 per MWh for the period June 2026 through May 2027. If the monthly CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net positive value, ComEd will multiply that value by the delivered quantity and pay the total to us. If the CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net negative value, we will multiply this value by the delivered quantity and pay the net value to ComEd. The average CMC prices per MWh were ($26.54) and ($17.11) for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and ($19.54) and ($6.53) for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The average CMC prices may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realized as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.
Nuclear PTC. Beginning in 2024, our nuclear units are eligible for a PTC extending through 2032. The nuclear PTC provides a transferable credit up to $15 per MWh and is subject to phase-out when annual gross receipts are between $26.00 per MWh and $44.75 per MWh for 2025 and 2026. Both the amount of the PTC and the gross receipts thresholds adjust for inflation annually through the duration of the program based on the GDP price deflator for the preceding calendar year.
Many of the state-sponsored programs (e.g., ZECs and CMCs) providing compensation for the emissions-free attributes of generation from certain of our nuclear units include contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received. See Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the nuclear PTC.
The following table summarizes the impacts to Operating revenues related to the benefits of nuclear PTC and state-sponsored programs subject to refund or pass through as described above for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 2025:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |
| Nuclear PTC revenue(a) | $44 | $175 | $(131) | (74.9)% | $69 | $220 | $(151) | (68.6)% |
| State-sponsored programs net revenue(b) | (280) | (220) | (60) | (27.3)% | (555) | (30) | (525) | (1750.0)% |
(a)Our estimate required the exercise of judgment in determining the amount of nuclear PTC expected for each of our nuclear units. Refer to Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)Includes only state-sponsored programs that have contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 2025, changes in Operating revenues by segment were approximately as follows:
| $ Change | % Change | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Atlantic | $114 | 6.5% | • favorable retail load revenue of $160 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• unfavorable realized economic hedges of $70 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Midwest | 172 | 12.4% | • favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $175 primarily due to higher energy prices• favorable retail load revenue of $130 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• unfavorable nuclear PTC revenue of $105 due to higher energy and capacity prices• unfavorable CMC program revenue of $55 primarily due to higher energy and capacity prices |
| New York | 11 | 2.0% | • no individually significant drivers |
| ERCOT | (36) | (5.7)% | • no individually significant drivers |
| Other Power Regions | (444) | (28.8)% | • unfavorable retail load revenue of $185 primarily due to lower energy prices in the West and lower load volumes in New England• unfavorable wholesale load revenue of $165 primarily due to lower load volumes in New England• unfavorable revenues of $90 in the West due to the impacts of ISO hourly energy netting |
| Calpine | 3,384 | 100.0% | • represents the operating revenues associated with our Calpine segment |
| Other | (15) | (1.8)% | • current year includes unfavorable amortization of $55 associated with certain commodity contracts related to the Calpine acquisition |
| Unrealized gains or losses(a)(b) | (206) | (a) | • losses on economic hedging activities of $362 in 2026 compared to losses of $156 in 2025, inclusive of Calpine |
| Total | $2,980 | 45.4% |
| $ Change | % Change | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Atlantic | $403 | 8.3% | • favorable retail load revenue of $630 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices• favorable wholesale load revenue of $165 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices, partially offset by lower load volumes; partially offset by• unfavorable realized economic hedges of $370 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Midwest | 545 | 12.6% | • favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $580 primarily due to higher energy prices, partially offset by lower generation volumes• favorable retail load revenue of $455 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and higher load volumes• favorable net capacity revenue of $185 primarily due to higher prices• favorable realized economic hedges of $80 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices; partially offset by• unfavorable CMC program revenue of $450 primarily due to higher energy and capacity prices• unfavorable ZEC program revenue of $180 primarily due to lower revenue recognized for Illinois ZECs delivered in prior planning years and decrease in ZEC price• unfavorable nuclear PTC revenue of $145 due to higher energy and capacity prices |
| New York | 47 | 2.8% | • favorable net generation revenue of $155 associated with the sale of generation volumes relative to purchased power to supply load primarily due to higher energy prices; partially offset by• unfavorable realized economic hedges of $75 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| ERCOT | (81) | (5.4)% | • unfavorable realized economic hedges of $65 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Other Power Regions | (726) | (17.0)% | • unfavorable wholesale load revenue of $370 primarily due to lower load volumes in New England• unfavorable retail load revenue of $285 primarily due to lower load volumes in New England and lower energy prices in the West• unfavorable revenues of $115 in the West due to the impacts of ISO hourly energy netting |
| Calpine | 7,926 | 100.0% | • represents the operating revenues associated with our Calpine segment since the date of acquisition |
| Other | (386) | (12.1)% | • current year includes unfavorable amortization of $475 associated with certain commodity contracts related to the Calpine acquisition• unfavorable revenues in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of $55 primarily due to lower energy prices; partially offset by• favorable retail gas revenue of $105 primarily due to higher gas prices |
| Unrealized gains or losses(a)(b) | 989 | (a) | • gains on economic hedging activities of $633 in 2026 compared to losses of $356 in 2025, inclusive of Calpine |
| Total | $8,717 | 44.8% |
(a)% Change in unrealized gains or losses is not a meaningful measure.
(b)See Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on unrealized gains and losses.
Purchased power and fuel. See Operating revenues above for discussion of our reportable segments and hedging strategies and for supplemental statistical data, including sales and supply sources by segment, nuclear fleet capacity factor, EFOF, capacity prices, and electricity prices.
With the exception of Calpine's natural gas activity, which is included in the Calpine segment, wholesale and retail natural gas activity, energy-related activity in the United Kingdom, as well as other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations are reported under Other and are not allocated to a segment.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 2025, Purchased power and fuel expense were as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $850 | $871 | $(21) | (2.4)% | $2,451 | $2,393 | $58 | 2.4% |
| Midwest | 630 | 447 | 183 | 40.9% | 2,098 | 1,489 | 609 | 40.9% |
| New York | 157 | 159 | (2) | (1.3)% | 491 | 458 | 33 | 7.2% |
| ERCOT | 247 | 213 | 34 | 16.0% | 571 | 589 | (18) | (3.1)% |
| Other Power Regions | 839 | 1,200 | (361) | (30.1)% | 2,734 | 3,560 | (826) | (23.2)% |
| Calpine | 1,457 | — | 1,457 | 100.0% | 3,845 | — | 3,845 | 100.0% |
| Total segment purchased power and fuel | 4,180 | 2,890 | 1,290 | 44.6% | 12,190 | 8,489 | 3,701 | 43.6% |
| Other | 702 | 702 | — | —% | 2,694 | 2,664 | 30 | 1.1% |
| Unrealized losses (gains)(a) | (482) | (25) | (457) | (a) | (109) | (70) | (39) | (a) |
| Total purchased power and fuel | $4,400 | $3,567 | $833 | 23.4% | $14,775 | $11,083 | $3,692 | 33.3% |
(a)% Change in unrealized losses (gains) is not a meaningful measure.
Natural Gas Prices. As an owner-operator of a large fleet of natural gas-fired generation facilities, the cost of our natural gas supply has a significant impact on our Purchased power and fuel expense. The following table summarizes the average daily reference price ($/MMBtu) for the periods presented in each geographic region where we have significant activity. This does not reflect prices we ultimately realized.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change | 2026 | 2025 | $ Change | % Change |
| Henry Hub | $2.87 | $3.03 | $(0.16) | (5.3)% | $3.56 | $3.48 | $0.08 | 2.3% |
| Transco Zone 6(a) | 1.85 | 2.23 | (0.38) | (17.0)% | 4.46 | 3.55 | 0.91 | 25.6% |
| Houston Ship Channel(b) | 2.46 | 2.69 | (0.23) | (8.6)% | 2.72 | 2.96 | (0.24) | (8.1)% |
| PG&E Citygate(c) | 3.09 | 3.47 | (0.38) | (11.0)% | 2.24 | 3.33 | (1.09) | (32.7)% |
| Algonquin Citygate(d) | 2.24 | 2.96 | (0.72) | (24.3)% | 6.19 | 5.85 | 0.34 | 5.8% |
(a)Transcontinental Gas pipeline located in Mid-Atlantic region.
(b)Houston-area pipeline and industrial network located in ERCOT region.
(c)Pacific Gas & Electric Company virtual trading point located in West region.
(d)Algonquin Gas Transmission physical delivery point located in New England region.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to 2025, changes in Purchased power and fuel expense by segment were approximately as follows:
| $ Change | % Change | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Atlantic | $(21) | (2.4)% | • favorable realized economic hedges of $75 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• unfavorable $70 associated with purchased power to supply load, net of generation, primarily due to higher energy prices |
| Midwest | 183 | 40.9% | • unfavorable $175 associated with purchased power to supply load, net of generation, primarily due to higher net transmission costs |
| New York | (2) | (1.3)% | • no individually significant drivers |
| ERCOT | 34 | 16.0% | • no individually significant drivers |
| Other Power Regions | (361) | (30.1)% | • favorable $210 associated with purchased power to supply load primarily due to lower load volumes in New England• favorable cost of $90 in the West due to the impacts of ISO hourly energy netting |
| Calpine | 1,457 | 100.0% | • represents the purchased power and fuel associated with our Calpine segment |
| Other | — | —% | • no individually significant drivers |
| Unrealized gains or losses(a)(b) | (457) | (a) | • gains on economic hedging activities of $482 in 2026 compared to gains of $25 in 2025, inclusive of Calpine |
| Total | $833 | 23.4% |
| $ Change | % Change | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mid-Atlantic | $58 | 2.4% | • unfavorable $475 associated with purchased power to supply load, net of generation, primarily due to higher energy prices, higher prices associated with net capacity costs, and higher costs related to an extreme weather event in January 2026; partially offset by• favorable realized economic hedges of $390 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable $65 due to financial transmission rights overfunding in 2026 |
| Midwest | 609 | 40.9% | • unfavorable $565 associated with purchased power to supply load, net of generation, primarily due to higher costs related to a significant weather event in January 2026 and net transmission costs |
| New York | 33 | 7.2% | • no individually significant drivers |
| ERCOT | (18) | (3.1)% | • no individually significant drivers |
| Other Power Regions | (826) | (23.2)% | • favorable $405 associated with purchased power to supply load primarily due to lower load volumes in New England, and lower energy prices in the West• favorable $185 associated with environmental product sales and lower environmental obligations• favorable cost of $115 in the West due to the impacts of ISO hourly energy netting• favorable realized economic power hedges of $105 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Calpine | 3,845 | 100.0% | • represents the purchased power and fuel associated with our Calpine segment since the date of acquisition |
| Other | 30 | 1.1% | • unfavorable net wholesale gas purchases of $105, inclusive of realized economic hedges, primarily due to higher gas prices• favorable purchases in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of $60 primarily due to lower energy prices |
| $ Change | % Change | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unrealized gains or losses(a)(b) | (39) | (a) | • gains on economic hedging activities of $109 in 2026 compared to gains of $70 in 2025, inclusive of Calpine |
| Total | $3,692 | 33.3% |
(a)% Change in unrealized gains or losses is not a meaningful measure.
(b)See Note 12 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on unrealized gains and losses.
The changes in Operating and maintenance expense consisted of the following:
| 2026 vs. 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| Increase (Decrease) | Increase (Decrease) | |
| Labor, contracting, and materials(a) | $261 | $666 |
| Calpine merger and integration costs | 62 | 273 |
| Nuclear refueling outage costs(b) | — | 119 |
| Changes in legal and environmental liabilities | 10 | 57 |
| Decommissioning-related activities | (16) | (284) |
| Other(c) | 163 | 520 |
| Total increase | $480 | $1,351 |
(a)Primarily reflects increased employee-related costs, including labor and other incentives, as well as higher contracting expense, driven in large part by the addition of Calpine's operations beginning in January 2026.
(b)Includes the co-owned Salem and STP generating units.
(c)Primarily includes administrative expenses such as information technology, regulatory fees, facilities and rentals, and insurance. The increase is driven primarily by the addition of Calpine's operations beginning in January 2026.
Depreciation and amortization expense increased by $213 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, and increased by $597 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to the additional depreciation and amortization associated with assets acquired from Calpine beginning in January 2026. See Note 2 — Mergers, Acquisitions, and Dispositions of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Interest expense, netincreased by $83 million for the three months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, and increased by $355 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, primarily due to a net increase in outstanding debt as a result of the debt assumed and related financing transactions following the acquisition of Calpine in January 2026. See Note 13 — Debt and Credit Agreements of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Other, net was unfavorable for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, due to activity described in the table below:
| Income (Deductions) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||
| 2026 | 2025 | 2026 | 2025 | |
| Decommissioning-related activities(a) | $(16) | $373 | $640 | $904 |
| Net unrealized gains (losses) from equity investments(b) | (8) | 19 | (32) | (256) |
| Other | (20) | 51 | (3) | 81 |
| Other, net | $(44) | $443 | $605 | $729 |
(a)Includes net realized and net unrealized gains (losses) on NDT fund investments, the elimination of decommissioning-related activities, and the elimination of income taxes related to all NDT fund activity for the Regulatory Agreement Units. See Note 9 — Asset Retirement Obligations and Note 18 — Supplemental Financial Information of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)Includes unrealized gains (losses) resulting from an equity investment in a publicly traded company. We record the fair value of this investment in Other deferred debits and other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on quoted market price of the stock.
Effective income tax rates were 18.2% and 33.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, and 25.4% and 32.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. The decrease in effective tax rate for the three months ended was primarily driven by the long-term rate change and lower qualified NDT fund income in the third quarter of 2026 which is taxed at a higher rate. The decrease in effective tax rate for the nine months ended was primarily due to proportionally lower qualified NDT fund income in 2026 which is taxed at a higher rate as well as long-term rate change. See Note 10 — Income Taxes of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.